1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenship

Discussion in 'U.S. Constitution & Law' started by Bigjon, May 8, 2015.



  1. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi






    U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61

    (See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct.
    2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21);

    WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity officials and judges are deemed to know the law and
    sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful
    deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot
    plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it
    is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no
    immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United
    States of America.

    See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.
    "When lawsuits are brought against federal
    officials, they must be brought against them in their "individual" capacity not their official
    capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the
    powers) and lose the shield of immunity."

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute;

    “All codes, rules and regulations are applicable to the government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking in due process.
    Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985)


    We, the People, created the governments and we did not give them the power to rule over us.

    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; US v Minker, 350 US 179 at 187:
    “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance.”


    This describes our current situation

    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 749, 90 S. Ct. 1463, 1469 (1970): See also Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972); Brookhart v. Janis, 384 U.S. 6 (1966); Empsak v. U.S., 190 (1955); and, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 58 (1938):
    Waivers of constitutional rights not only must be voluntary but must be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.


    We cannot be tricked into giving up our un-a-lien-a-ble rights. This essentially voids most of the actions of our Congress, etc.

    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95:
    “The primary and general rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language he has used. He is presumed to know the meaning of the words and the rules of grammar.”


    The group who enacts the law must know what they have enacted. Congress is responsible for reading the bills before they are enacted.

    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; Staub v. Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 322:
    “It is settled by a long line of recent decisions of this Court that an ordinance which, like this one, makes the peaceful enjoyment of freedoms which the Constitution guarantees contingent upon the uncontrolled will of an official - as by requiring a permit or license which may be granted or withheld in the discretion of such official - is an unconstitutional censorship or prior restraint upon the enjoyment of those freedoms.” And our decisions have made clear that a person faced with such an unconstitutional licensing law may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right of free expression for which the law purports to require a license.”

    Shuttlesworth v Birmingham (Alabama), 394 U.S. 147 (1969).


    Neither the State, nor the Federal Government, can require permits, or licenses. We, the People, have the right to pursue whatever business activity we desire without any interference from any of our governments. They were not granted any powers to regulate the activities of the Citizens.
     
  2. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenship

    This is Judge Anna here in Alaska: all controversy related to this post is unnecessary and has already been adequately explained

    Posted on August 22, 2015by arnierosner
    On Aug 21, 2015, at 2:17 PM, Anna Von Fritz <avannavon@gmail.com> wrote:

    This is Judge Anna here in Alaska.

    I believe that all controversy related to this post is unnecessary and has already been adequately explained by our book, “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”.

    In it you learn precisely how Americans have been press-ganged into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea and have as a result been attached, attacked, and deprived of their rights and property under conditions of fraud, semantic deceit, and non-disclosure.

    I was one of those who discovered and pioneered the use of the “revocation of election to pay” section of the IRC as relief from federal tax claims and it does essentially work as Sov has described, however, it is NOT the panacea that he appears to assume.

    It is just one (good) answer to over-reaching federal agents and one federal agency.

    If done properly according to the beginning and ending of the Federal Fiscal Year (make Revocation effective July 1, not January 1 of the year you wish to stop paying) such revocation is a valid means of canceling the novation presumptions of the 1040. Thereafter, by the IRC’s own rules you CANNOT pay income tax again.

    This is valid for all those who want to stop paying Federal Income Taxes, however, this DOES NOT officially correct your status.

    Americans can function in their birthright status as part of the Republic as “non-citizens”— their sovereign capacity— or they may accept the duties of citizenship of the Republic, meaning the Continental United States.

    Remember that each State is a sovereign nation under international law.

    The States of the Republic retain 100% control of the land jurisdiction

    And whatever elements of the sea jurisdiction that were not specifically delegated to the federation of States.

    So you can be a non-citizen national or a citizen of your State on the land and still be recognized within the Republic.

    The problem comes when you are mischaracterized as a Federal United States Citizen (status of someone born on Guam, for example) or as a UNITED STATES Citizen (status of federal military personnel, for example).

    These are foreign citizenship statuses (resident and non-resident) that the rats will willingly foist off on you via various semantic deceits, non-disclosed contracts, and false claims.

    They have racked up a lot of “evidence” that you are a Federal United States Citizen over the years and you have not objected because you haven’t been aware of the deceits and practices involved.
    It is hard to object to a contract if you don’t know it exists.

    Now you know that you have been classified as a Federal United States Citizen and through ignorance on your part and coercion on theirs, you have done many things that support their presumptions against your natural born status.

    Over the years you have repeatedly checked the box agreeing that you were a “US Citizen” — thinking that meant “Continental United States” when instead it meant “Federal United States”.

    You signed up (under conditions of semantic deceit and coercion) for “Social Security”– which is and always was a program exclusively for federal employees, foreign welfare recipients and asylum seekers. Look up Title 42 and you will see that— if you are a typical American — you never even qualified for the program, but you signed up, which gives them an excuse to presume you are a Federal United States Citizen.

    Same thing on your Passport. You checked the box saying you were a “US Citizen” and you gave them Social Security Number and you listed a Federal State of State as a permanent address instead of claiming a Rural Free Delivery address. All these mistakes caused by your ignorance and their failure to disclose indicate that you are a Federal United States Citizen and not a Continental United States Citizen or as Federal–Speak has it, a Non-Citizen National.

    When you read Federal forms you have to read them from their perspective. From their point of view an American inhabiting the jurisdiction of the Republic is called a “non-citizen National” because you are


    NOT a Federal United States Citizen (one of theirs).

    When you pay federal income tax you similarly unknowingly agree to being counted as a Federal United States Citizen. So paying income tax is evidence (from their perspective) that you volunteered to act as a Withholding Agent as a Federal United States Citizen and volunteered to do all the record keeping and to pay the tax.

    Why else would you do it, if you are not a Federal United States Citizen?

    Same thing when you register your car and give the Federal State of State an interest in your private property— same thing when you apply for a Driver or Marriage License— why would you do any of that if you were NOT a Federal United States Citizen and required to do it?

    The answer is that you have been tricked and coerced and deceived and deliberately misinformed, so the rats could gain control of you and your ESTATE.

    You have supposedly done all this voluntarily. Otherwise, what they have coerced you to do and misinformed you to do would clearly be a CRIME on their part. That is why they set things up to make it look like you just volunteered to give the Federal State of State corporations an ownership interest in your estate and your private auto, your marriage and your businesses and your labor.

    Refusing to pay federal taxes on corporate income (when you are not operating as a corporation) and refusing to act as an unpaid federal employee (withholding agent) is an important first step toward untangling yourself and your assets from this morass of commercial fraud, but it is not the first or only step that has to be taken.

    Several teams of experts are working on the best ways and means to address the fraud on the national level(s)– State and Federal– and on the one at a time level.

    We are researching the simplest means to untangle this mess at all these different levels.

    Be watching for Book Two: More of You a Know Something Is Wrong When….

    Sent from my iPhone
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2016
  3. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenship

    You may just want to check this out…defendant overcame and nullified the hoax of Federal jurisdiction

    Posted on October 28, 2015 by arnierosner

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress....-midstream-refuse-to-participate-any-further/

    Sister Federal tax case: Judge and DOJ attorneys abandon case midstream, decline to participate any further

    October 28, 2015

    supremecourtcase


    Leave a comment On September 14, 2015, Petitioner filed in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138,

    Defendant’s Objection to Denial of Due Process of Law and Demand for Disclosure of the Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas[/URL] (the “Objection and Demand”).


    Plaintiff United States had 14 days to respond, but went silent (first and only time of which Petitioner is aware, that the government failed to respond to a challenge of jurisdiction).

    As of September 29, 2015, it was incumbent on the Court to dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or (h)(3) or 41(b).

    The Court, however, stood mute.

    Thereafter, Petitioner filed on September 30, 2015, Petitioner’s Demand for Dismissal, with Prejudice, of this Alleged Case for Lack of Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas (the “Demand for Dismissal”).

    Plaintiff had until October 14, 2015, to produce the constitutional authority that gives the Court the capacity to take jurisdiction in Tyler County, Texas.

    As of this post (October 28, 2015), 44 days have passed since the filing of the Objection and Demand and 28 since the Demand for Dismissal and neither the judge nor either of the Department of Justice attorneys has responded in any way following Petitioner’s demands.

    The reason neither the judge nor DOJ attorneys will respond or confirm or deny Petitioner’s filings, is that anything that any of them may say in writing—whether for or against Petitioner—will evince treason to the Constitution, not only on their part, but on the part of every other Federal judge and DOJ attorney doing business anywhere in the Union.

    Notwithstanding that the penalty for treason to the Constitution is death, the Federal judge and DOJ attorneys in this case have a more pressing situation on their hands:

    The entire fraudulent Federal judicial apparatus is at stake because no contemporary Federal court has the capacity to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, or decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in any county, parish, or borough in America—and there is no reason why the above filings from this case will not produce the same results in any other Federal case, civil or criminal, anywhere in the Union.

    If the Department of Justice cannot win a case anywhere in America, the days of the hoax of Federal jurisdiction over the American People are numbered.

    The sister Federal tax case in the Lufkin Division was an attempt to foreclose on Federal tax liens filed against Petitioner’s ranch. Judge and plaintiff having departed the field of battle, said case is over in substance—Petitioner prevailing.

    Regarding the original Federal tax case, United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil No. 4:14-cv-0027 (which the Supreme Court declined to review): There are other remedies available to Petitioner and Petitioner is pursuing them. Developments will be posted on this website as they occur.

    * * * *

    Note: If a sufficient number of requests are received (under “Leave a comment” in the left-hand margin above), Petitioner will make available in PDF format on this website the docket and full contents of the record of both the original Houston Division case and the sister Federal tax case in the Lufkin Division. The record of these two cases chronicles and documents certain seminal congressional acts that are not taught in any school but have been used to deceive and deprive the American People of the unalienable and constitutional Right of Liberty and foist upon them (1) so-called civil (municipal) rights, (2) rules and regulations (statutes), and (3) municipal (Roman civil) law—a state of affairs abhorrent to the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution for which they all risked their life to escape.

    The Lufkin Division case is the first time in American history that a defendant overcame and nullified the hoax of Federal jurisdiction and caused the United States District Judge, United States Attorney, and Assistant United States Attorney to flee.


     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2016
    arminius and Goldhedge like this.
  4. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenship

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2015/10/01/sister-case-petitioner-demands-the-courts-constitutional-authority-plaintiff-and-court-go-silent-petitioner-demands-immediate-dismissal-and-costs-restitution-and-damages-of-1841451-45/

    excerpt:

    For any court to exercise jurisdiction in a particular geographic area, there is a requirement that the Constitution must have given the court the capacity to take it; to wit:

    “It remains rudimentary law that “[a]s regards all courts of the United States inferior to this tribunal [United States Supreme Court], two things are necessary to create jurisdiction, whether original or appellate. The Constitution must have given to the court the capacity to take it, and an act of Congress must have supplied it. . . .” [Emphasis in original.] Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 (1989).

    That a lawsuit is authorized by the statutes of Congress, however, is not, in and of itself, sufficient to vest jurisdiction in any Federal court; to wit:

    “So, we conclude, as we did in the prior case, that, although these suits may sometimes so present questions arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States that the Federal courts will have jurisdiction, yet the mere fact that a suit is an adverse suit authorized by the statutes of Congress is not in and of itself sufficient to vest jurisdiction in the Federal courts.” Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U.S. 505, 513 (1900).

    Article III of the Constitution creates the Supreme Court and authorizes Congress to ordain and establish inferior trial courts of special (or limited) jurisdiction—with no authority to exercise general jurisdiction (territorial, personal, and subject matter) anywhere in the Union.

    Courtesy of Congress, however (since no later than June 25, 1948), every United States District Court is a court of general jurisdiction and hears and decides both civil and criminal cases, an implied power granted only in the territorial clause of the Constitution, Article 4 § 3(2), and only in Federal territory, such as the District of Columbia and the territories; to wit, in pertinent part:

    “The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; . . .”

    All Federal civil and criminal proceedings fall under Title 28 U.S.C.Judiciary and Judicial Procedure Chapter 176 Federal Debt Collection Procedure.

    Congress define “judgment” in Title 28 U.S.C., Chapter 176, Section 3002(8) as follows:

    “‘Judgment’ means a judgment, order, or decree entered in favor of the United States in a court and arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt.”

    On September 14, 2015, Petitioner files in the Lufkin Case, “Defendant’s Objection to Denial of Due Process of Law and Demand for Disclosure of the Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas” (the “Objection and Demand”) (hyperlinked below).

    The statutory period for plaintiff United States to respond to the Objection and Demand is 14 days.

    On September 29, 2015, 15 days after the filing of the Objection and Demand, the record in the Lufkin Case is devoid of response from either plaintiff or the Court—and Petitioner transmits to the clerk on that date, for filing September 30, 2015, “Demand for Dismissal, with Prejudice, of this Alleged Case for Lack of Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas” (the “Demand for Dismissal”) (hyperlinked below).

    The reason neither plaintiff nor the Lufkin Court could produce the constitutional authority that allows the Court to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, and decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in Tyler County, Texas, is because there is no such constitutional authority.

    For the Lufkin Court to reveal that it is using Article 4 § 3(2) of the Constitution to take jurisdiction in Tyler County, Texas, and extend its jurisdiction beyond the boundaries fixed by the Constitution for territorial courts of general jurisdiction into geographic area fixed by the Constitution exclusively for constitutional courts of special (or limited) jurisdiction, would be to confess to usurpation of exercise of jurisdiction and treason to the Constitution.

    “How can this be?” or “How can they get away with this?” you may ask.

    The answer is simple.

    When Congress define a word or expression by legislative act, the ordinary and popular meaning (as found in the dictionary or encyclopedia) is stripped away and the new term means only what Congress define it to mean—and there is no discretion for anyone to take such term in any other way than provided in the statute.

    In all civil and criminal proceedings in United States District Courts, “United States” is a term with a special definition and meaning.

    In Title 28 U.S.C. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, in the chapter and section that defines “court,” “debt,” “judgment,” and “United States” (Chapter 176 Federal Debt Collection Procedure, Section 3002), “United States” means a Federal corporation (28 U.S.C. 3002(15)).

    In the United States District Court conducting the Lufkin Case, “United States” means a Federal corporation—and the ultimate parent Federal corporation, over all other Federal entities of any kind—is the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2015/10/01/sister-case-petitioner-demands-the-courts-constitutional-authority-plaintiff-and-court-go-silent-petitioner-demands-immediate-dismissal-and-costs-restitution-and-damages-of-1841451-45/#_ftn1[1]

    Every appearance of “United States” in anything and everything relating to Federal district courts means, literally, District of Columbia Municipal Corporation; e.g.:

    · “Congress of the United States” means, literally, Congress of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.
    · “Title 28 United States Code” means, literally, Title 28 District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Code.
    · “United States District Court” means, literally, District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Court.
    · “United States District Judge” means, literally, District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Judge.
    · “United States Attorney” means, literally, District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Attorney.

    In Federal civil and criminal proceedings, there is no discretion for anyone to take “United States” any other way.

    Actors in government rely on cognitive dissonance on the part of victims of the Federal word game to perpetrate the fraud, commit treason to the Constitution, and subject the American People to District of Columbia municipal law.

    The hoax is protected by a culture of silence among all initiates in the Federal judiciary, Department of Justice, and other key positions in government.

    And that is how they get away with it.

    In summation: United States District Courts (i.e., Article 4 § 3(2) District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Courts) have extended their jurisdiction beyond the boundaries fixed by the Constitution for territorial courts of general jurisdiction (District of Columbia and the territories only), into geographic area fixed by the Constitution exclusively for constitutional courts of special / limited jurisdiction (the Union).

    There is no constitutional authority that gives any contemporary United States District Court the capacity to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, and decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in any county in America—and no one can produce such authority.

    Objection and Demand, September 14, 2015

    Demand for Dismissal, September 30, 2015

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2015/10/01/sister-case-petitioner-demands-the-courts-constitutional-authority-plaintiff-and-court-go-silent-petitioner-demands-immediate-dismissal-and-costs-restitution-and-damages-of-1841451-45/#_ftnref1

    [1] “An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871; later legislated in “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

    ="https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2015/10/01/sister-case-petitioner-demands-the-courts-constitutional-authority-plaintiff-and-court-go-silent-petitioner-demands-immediate-dismissal-and-costs-restitution-and-damages-of-1841451-45/#_ftnref2"

    [2] In general, people cannot reconcile the 75 absurd, convoluted definitions of “United States” scattered throughout the United States Code with what they believe is the United States. For those few souls who manage to figure it out and speak up about it, actors in government follow a culture-of-silence policy of “Never respond, confirm, or deny.” Examples of this are (1) Chief Judge Ron Clark’s six weeks of silence following Petitioner’s motion for him to recuse himself for incompetence by reason of ignorance of law, and (2) ZERO government progress in the Lufkin Case in more than 14 months.

    If a particular intended victim persists, government actors may mock / ridicule him by implication by quoting him, as if to say, “Can you believe how crazy this guy is? He thinks the United States is a Federal corporation!” (28 U.S.C. 3002(15)), knowing it will be next to impossible for the victim to secure general agreement in society as to the truth of the matter.

    Petitioner obviates the cognitive-dissonance factor in the Lufkin Case by going straight to the supreme determinant, upon which the Lufkin Court’s very existence depends: the constitutional authority that gives the Court the capacity to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, and decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in Tyler County, Texas. There is no such constitutional authority—and the Lufkin Court and every other United States District Court located throughout the Union is a kangaroo court with no lawful authority to do business in any county, borough, or parish in America.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2016
    arminius, michael59 and Goldhedge like this.
  5. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi

    Ask the judge if he is willing to go on the record and 'voluntarily violate his oath of office'.

    Ask him if he is willing to go on the record and 'voluntarily violate your unalienable rights'.

    Ask him if he is willing to go on the record and 'voluntarily commit an act of treason against these 50 united States'





    Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
    Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the
    United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation
    of the supreme law of the land.
    The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
    The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or
    judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking
    to support it".

    See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188);
    U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980);
    Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).




    U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61
    WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity
    (See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21;
    officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America.
    See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.
    "When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their "individual" capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity."



    “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.”
    Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821)
    US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980)
     
  6. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi

     
    Bigjon likes this.
  7. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
  8. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi

    Judge Anna is clear on this, the people who are in the federal zone have every right to operate there. However we have a right to repopulate and reinitialize the largely abandoned State National side as those laws are still on the books and were never removed. We can have our republic with our god given rights and let the Federal's keep their civil rights.
     
  9. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi

    23. What federal courts are authorized to prosecute income tax crimes?

    This question must be addressed in view of the Answer to Question 22 above. Although it may appear that certain statutes in the IRC grant original jurisdiction to federal district courts, to institute prosecutions of income tax crimes, none of the statutes found in subtitle F has ever taken effect. For this reason, those statutes do not authorize the federal courts to do anything at all. As always, appearances can be very deceiving. Remember the Wizard of Oz or the mad tea party of Alice in Wonderland?

    On the other hand, the federal criminal Code at Title 18, U.S.C., does grant general authority to the District Courts of the United States (“DCUS”) to prosecute violations of the statutes found in that Code. See 18 U.S.C. 3231.

    It is very important to appreciate the fact that these courts are not the same as the United States District Courts (“USDC”). The DCUS are constitutional courts that originate in Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The USDC are territorial tribunals, or legislative courts, that originate in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Territory Clause.

    This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Eighth Circuit on behalf of the Defendant in USA v. Gilbertson cites numerous court cases that have already clarified the all important distinction between these two classes of federal district courts. For example, in Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 at 312 (1922), the high Court held that the USDC belongs in the federal Territories. This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Ninth Circuit in Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. develops this theme in even greater detail; begin reading at section “7(e)”.

    The USDC, as such, appear to lack any lawful authorities to prosecute income tax crimes. The USDC are legislative tribunals where summary proceedings dominate.

    For example, under the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1292, the U.S. Courts of Appeal have no appellate jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders issued by the USDC. Further details on this point are available in the Press Release entitled “Private Attorney General Cracks Title 28 of the United States Code” and dated November 26, 2001 A.D.


    Several active links at site:
    http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm


    ------------------------------------------------------------

    DCUS vs USDC


    Now, if this is truly the case, and nobody has been able to prove us wrong about this matter, the United States (federal government) is in a heap of trouble here, because it has been prosecuting people in the wrong courts ever since the Civil War; furthermore, those courts have no criminal jurisdiction whatsoever, because such an authority is completely lacking from Titles 18 and 28, both of which have been enacted into positive law, unlike Title 26, which has not been enacted into positive law. See Title 1 for details.

    What do we do with this earth-shaking discovery? Well, when any federal case is filed, the criminal defendant should submit a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request immediately, for such things as any regulations which have been published in the Federal Register, pursuant to the Federal Register Act, for 18 U.S.C. 3231.

    It won't hurt to submit similar FOIA requests for the credentials of all federal employees who have "touched" the case in any way.

    Since we already know that there are no regulations for 18 U.S.C. 3231, and that federal employees will usually refuse to produce their credentials, your FOIA requests will be met with silence, whereupon you will file a FOIA appeal. Once the appeal deadline has run, you are in court.

    But which court? Guess ...

    ... the answer is the District Court of the United States. What an amazing discovery, yes? A United States District Judge in Arizona, in late Spring of 1996, ruled that the United States District Court (“USDC”) is not the proper forum to litigate a request under the FOIA. That can only be because FOIA requests must be litigated in the District Court of the United States (“DCUS”).

    Now we have the United States checkmated. The proper forum for FOIA is now res judicata. If the DCUS is the proper forum for FOIA, and if the USDC is NOT the proper forum for FOIA, then the USDC is not the proper forum for prosecuting violations of Title 18 either, because the USDC does not show up in 5 U.S.C. 552 or in 18 U.S.C. 3231!

    Read that last paragraph again, and again, until you get it. It's okay to admit that you must read it several times; this writer once read a paragraph from Hooven and Allison v. Evatt some 20 different times, until the meaning was finally clear.

    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/karmacts.htm
     
    michael59 likes this.
  10. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi

    Ok, we have the United states court and we have the district court of the US. So how does the foi maniacally get from one to the other? And if it can't then you just challenge their say so but you have to know why you challenge their jurisdiction. Now, do I have that right?

    So I take it all this is current as in just happened/happening? If true then I am going to copy this down and ship it off to a friend who is getting his donkey kicked by the tax man now.

    That link I supplied above is actually off of a.Yahoo.com news link about sovereigns serving a judge an not really appropriate for.this thread but I am going to leave it so I don't lose it.
     
  11. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenshi




    Consent and Contracts

    · Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
    · Consent makes the law: the terms of a contract, lawful in its purpose, constitute the law as between the parties.
    · To him consenting no injury is done.
    · He who consents cannot receive an injury.
    · Consent removes or obviates a mistake.
    · He who mistakes is not considered as consenting.
    · Every consent involves a submission; but a mere submission does not necessarily involve consent.
    · A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.
    · One who wills a thing to be or to be done cannot complain of that thing as an injury.
    · The agreement of the parties makes the law of the contract.
    · The contract makes the law.
    · Agreements give the law to the contract.
    · The agreement of the parties overcomes or prevails against the law.
    · Advice, unless fraudulent, does not create an obligation.
    · No action arises out of an immoral consideration.
    · No action arises on an immoral contract.
    · In the agreements of the contracting parties, the rule is to regard the intention rather than the words.
    · The right of survivorship does not exist among merchants for the benefit of commerce.
    · When two persons are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the other must bear the whole.
    · You ought to know with whom you deal.
    · He who contracts, knows, or ought to know, the quality of the person with whom he contracts, otherwise he is not excusable.
    · He who approves cannot reject.
    · If anything is due to a corporation, it is not due to the individual members of it, nor do the members individually owe what the corporation owes.
    · Agreement takes the place of the law: the express understanding of parties supercedes such understanding as the law would imply.
    · Manner and agreement overrule the law.
    · The essence of a contract being assent, there is no contract where assent is wanting.

    ---------------------------------


    http://www.goldismoney2.com/showthread.php?73801-THE-IRS-TITLE-15-IS-THEIR-ACHILLES-HEEL
     
    michael59 and Po'boy like this.
  12. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corp Slave Citizenship

    FROM Anna von Reitz: To All—

    I am doing this with a skeleton staff and a huge amount of work on my table. I wish I could "do it all" and help people with their individual cases, too, but I can't. There are literally millions of Americans sitting in private for-profit jails who should not be there and trillions of dollars of American assets at risk. I have to keep my eye on the ball and we all have to keep moving forward as best we can. For me, that means pursuing the UN, the rats in DC, the World Bank. For the rest of you, that means educating yourselves, your families, your friends, your neighbors, and yes, the sheriffs and "county" officials and "state" officials and everyone else.

    These groups of undeclared commercial mercenaries have "invaded" our country for the purpose of dispossessing us. The only thing that will stop them is a widespread public knowledge of who they are and what they are and an equally public and determined exposure of the facts.

    How many "County" Sheriffs really want to prosecute innocent people under color of law? How many want to risk prosecution--- real prosecution under Public Law--- if they do?

    That's what's coming, folks.
    Any time that you incorporate anything, it falls under the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the Satanic Law of the Sea or the almost-as-bad Law Merchant.

    So what do you do to get back to land?
    First, foremost, Job One---- you declare yourself one of the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States" described by the Definitive Treaty of Peace called the Treaty of Paris, 1783, Article III and NOT an "inhabitant"--- NOT a British Crown subject nor subject of any kind.

    Second, make it clear that you are "citizen" of your organic state on the land--- oregon, wisconsin, idaho, and so on. They will try to claim that you are "stateless" but you are not. Your "States" are the "States of America" and they are each unincorporated trading companies in their own right, owed the good faith and protection of the British government and the British Monarch.

    Third--- you all have decisions to make. Your elected the "county officials" in good faith to operate the land jurisdiction of your county, but because of either ignorance or fraud, they are operating as local franchises of a bank owned and operated government services corporation instead.

    You can't liquidate such a "county franchise" because it belongs to the bank, but you can liquidate the bank for fraud and criminal activity. Alternatively, you can leave such a "county" in operation so long as it serves and addresses ONLY federal employees and others who are subject to the federal corporation and hold Public Elections to fill all the vacant Public Offices of your own County on the land. Just make the appropriate Public Notices and organize the unincorporated Counties, elect your Public Officials, and go for it. Elect your Common Law Court Judges, Clerks, Bailiffs, Sheriffs--- don't forget the Coroner. And then once your counties are organized, organize your unincorporated States---- which are not "States of Anything"---- they are States, period: Alaska State, Iowa State, Oregon State.

    Once properly elected, bonded, and sworn in, your land jurisdiction County Sheriff is the top Law Enforcement Officer in the country. He can deputize as many men from the community as he needs, saddle up, and ride. He is fully empowered to go to the federal officials and demand that they fork over all American state citizens that have been improperly prosecuted under statutory law to his custody. The feds have to turn over all but those accused of murder or assault with a deadly weapon.

    The Sheriff can then determine if the victim of this fraud did anything against the Public Law and release them if they did not.

    The federales operating their "states" and "counties" as corporate franchises have been making money hand over fist by pretending that we are all "inhabitants" of their jurisdiction and subjects of the British Crown. They then enforce their in-house corporate administrative "codes and regulations" as if these were Public Laws. By creating 80,000,000 "statutory laws" they create infinite opportunity to accuse people of "crimes" and throw them in jail--- a "service" that they charge the victims for to the tune of $25,000.00 per misdemeanor and over a million for each felony.

    This is Big Business, big syndicated crime. But there are only so many of them, and a lot more of us, and guess what? They have been running rampant all over the rest of the world, too, so that virtually everyone on the planet hates their guts.

    If you are Vladimir Putin or the Chinese General Secretary, what makes more sense? Fighting 390 million Americans, or attacking the real cause of the problem?

    It's time for us to clean up our own mess. That observation goes out to the "inhabitants" as well as the "free sovereign and independent people of the United States". If we don't, the rest of the world is going to have to come in here and clean it up for us. It's that simple and it's that bad.
    So, get moving. Know who you are and assert it. Educate, educate, educate---- and take action.

    I am obviously fighting the Good Fight on a large scale, doing all that I can to defend our country from continued usurpation and criminality. This is situation is being exposed and put under the royal noses and everywhere else it needs to be, but this also means that I don't have time to get involved in individual cases.

    Remember what I said--- there are literally MILLIONS of Americans rotting in private, for-profit jails who have committed no crime, who have been kidnapped into the foreign federal jurisdiction, accused under inapplicable statutory law, convicted, and there they sit being used as slave labor while the perpetrators of these crimes charge our treasury for the "public service”.

    What would happen if I and the others like me stopped to help Joe and Nell and Jake? Then the real job--- ending this whole system of predation and injustice--- would get lost in the infinite need of millions of individuals and nothing would get done on the larger scale.

    Please understand. If I could, I would walk into every courtroom and stop every travesty. I would seize every bond of every state and bank involved in this, too. But I cannot do it all and I can't do it alone, and if everyone keeps calling me and emailing me with their individual problems, I can't get my work done.

    Now, I've given you all more than enough to do. Declare and record (do NOT "register") your declaration of Political Status. Realize that "Sovereign Citizen" is an oxymoron--- you can't be both at the same time. You are either a sovereign (as with respect to the United States) or you are a citizen (as with respect to your organic colorado state). It's one or the other.

    Realize that these "inhabitants" who are subjects of the British Crown are here to provide you and your States of America (unincorporated trading companies) with "essential governmental services"---- Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2---and to defend your national trust --- "Preamble" --- and have no other legitimate business on our shores. They shouldn't even be talking to you unless they are spoken to.

    And they should not be "misaddressing" any mail to YOUR NAME in any configuration, but especially not any NAME that uses only a middle initial.
    Think, people---- get out your Shinola Sensors!

    Exactly which LEROY M. BROWN would that be? LEROY MARK BROWN or LEROY MARTIN BROWN or LEROY MALCOLM BROWN or????

    These vermin are charging you under names that aren't even legal names.

    Ask your "County" "Sheriff" and your "State" "Troopers" to explain that one to you?

    Once you get girded up, organize your unincorporated county government to operate the land jurisdiction of the United States. And don't let anyone stop you or tell you that you can't do it. This is your country. Rise and shine!

    If the British Crown and the City State of Westminster want to fight with us after guaranteeing us "perpetual amity" by treaty, we'll just point out who the real rotters are and join with the rest of the entire world in dealing with the problem.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2016
  13. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rebuttal Versus Reclamation — Exodus to the Land
    Posted on August 3, 2016by David Robinson
    [​IMG] Judge Anna von Reitz

    The Twelve Steps I published some time ago are rebuttals to presumptions that are being held against DEFENDANTS in court cases addressed to the “CITIZEN” named after you. These presumptions are fatal and result in being held guilty 100% of the time if they are not answered and rebutted—- and nobody tells you they exist, so, guess what? The conviction rate in these “Debt Collection Courts” runs 98%.
    .
    Those steps are not going to set you free or reclaim your estate or get you back on the land, though they do increase your chances of escaping a conviction if you are already snarled into one of their courts.
    .
    The means to getting your estate reclaimed is the subject of the past year of work by me and whole the Living Law Firm team and I can now safely say that the fundamental process to deliver yourself back to the land jurisdiction is fairly simple:
    .
    1. Do an adult name change from the NAME—- JOHN MICHAEL DOE, for example, to the Upper and Lower Case name styled like this: John Michael Doe. This is the correct English Grammar and the correct Christian appellation and you need no more reason than this to do it.
    .
    2. The name change costs around $150 and takes 60-90 days on average. Immediately after receiving the final name change decree from the court, issue a Deed of Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-conveyance Without Consideration and record it with the Land Recording Office. Take a certified copy back to the Clerk of Court and have it recorded and made part of the case file at the court, too. You have now come full circle and advised the court of your action in return.
    .
    The verbiage is very simple. Here’s an example:
    .
    “On this 18th day of July in the Anno Domini year 2016 I have received and do accept my own Trade Name doing business as John Michael Doe and do re-convey it to Lawful Jurisdiction and its native domicile on the soil and land of the wyoming state and do place this Deed upon the Public Record in token of my action.”
    .
    Notice— you seize upon the Name as soon as it is decreed to be yours, and reconvey it to the “soil and land” of the organic state. You can either say “organic state” or you can write the name in all small letters.
    .
    You are now in fully agreed upon possession of your own given name and you have removed it back to the land jurisdiction. You have also identified it as a “Trade Name” and not a “Foreign Situs Trust” so that the rats can’t pretend otherwise and do a repeat of the FDR Fraud.
    .
    In simply doing this you have “reoccupied” the land jurisdiction of Wyoming and begun the process of coming home.
    .
    Do that much for yourself and your family and your country and over half the battle is won, because this finally gives you the solid ground and standing with which to assert your identity and begin the process of reclaiming the rest of your property.
     
  14. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    You cannot have an ESTATE unless you are dead and even then you do not have it as some other human must be the executor of that estate which would only carry your name. So I don't know how one would reclaim their estate in twelve steps.

    But in court unless I cause harm then the defence challenge jurisdiction along with objecting to hearsay supplied by officer or prosecutor. It is their words one makes objections for the record on. And then there is the objection to clarify without making it a question, yeah you don't want the back robe pos giving opinion.
    This challenge will lead to the administrative law judge doing the nasty and entering plea on my behalf. PLEA ON MY BEHALF.

    When he does that or says he is going to do it then it is "objection, point of clarification. This human has not been deemed mentally incompetent there by becoming a ward of the state, this human has not contracted civilly with the administrative law judge to carry out matters of consent concerning his life and this human is alive and standing right here and is not in need of anything that would administer his estate as he is alive as of this moment."
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2016
  15. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you change your name to the exact same name but change the capitalization and stuff, it isn't going to fly in court. You sign some agreement and it says BOB and you say, "I am not BOB I am Bob." They are just going to call you an idiot and you will still be guilty. If you change it to something different in order to avoid debts and stuff, then you may get arrested for fraud.
     
  16. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    You should quit.....do you even understand what this is all about?
     
    Bigjon likes this.
  17. Ragnarok

    Ragnarok I'd rather be Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    4,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wish I knew someone who has actually done all of this.
    Has Judge Anna von Reitz actually done this?
    How has it worked out for you/her/them?

    R.
     
    Bigjon and historyrepete like this.
  18. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People do this all the time, and they get convicted all the time. Also Anna von Reitz is not a judge. She just declared herself a judged based off this crazy talk. She has no actual authority in anything. It is entirely fantasy. She is either deluded and living in a fantasy world or a conman. Please don't listen to the advise of people who make up their own official sounding titles and pretend to be experts in a field.

    I know some people don't trust the government, and hate academia and stuff but these are real titles that have some meaning. If you don't want to call a judge, judge and you don't want to call a Doctor, Dr, then whatever. You don't have to conform to any of that sort of etiquette. However, don't call people by their fake imaginary title they made up in order to sound important.

    The fact that she made up her own title and is telling people she is a judge when she isn't, should be a massive red flag.
     
  19. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    Holie cow pies bits, that there is a massive showing of ignorance that is not worth even quoting. And, yes I do know people who have done this, this state citizen thing. I won't do it because of the state citizen which means under the protection of, which in my opinion is a really ambiguous term, meaning it can be construed as either a corporate citizen or a private citizen. It is the word citizen which makes it ambiguous it's not like saying corporate human as opposed to private human because citizen is taken to mean under the protection of. That is what in my mind makes this non effective.

    As per judge in being OR not being, do not the people of this land have a immutable right to association? Yes bits that is a question to you. By this association are they not free to elect whom they want for what they want? Oh yes that is a true statement! And, you propose that they don't by your thoughts as written in saying "she's not a real judge."

    Let's just take this judge thing: What makes a real trier of fact? It is people who come forward. Of the people who come forward some are chosen. This trier of fact can be singular as in a judge or it can be plural as in jury, they are selected the same in that they come together by association and are chosen. By your words you are stating that the corporate state "is" the one and only to be concerned with. Well you are wrong.

    It is a matter of FACT that a fiction cannot be harmed, the trial of William Penn demonstrated this. Sure, sure he was tried in a common law court you might think but the only thing common about that trial was that it was a court complete with charges, defence and a trier of fact which consisted of a jury. This court was so common it issued a judgment which was a fiction could not be harmed ther fore William Penn was was not impaired by contract. And, you propose that a fiction is the true representation of life by your phallic statement of "she is not a real judge?" Shame on you.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2016
  20. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's more complicated than you indicate... like usual, you're making up your own brand of bullshit.

    The Country called the USA has two types of jurisdictions one Federal and the other for the States.

    No one has been operating in the jurisdiction of the State, until Anna and a few other people who took a look at our actual law. We are all owed our republic States and our common law courts. They operated for a long time here in Minnesota, but when our counties incorporated we seem to have lost them. The laws were not changed, but the counties jumped out of their lawful jurisdiction and into an admiralty corporate one.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_of_the_peace


    There is a very famous case presided over by Judge Mahoney, called "The Credit River Decision".
    http://www.constitutionalconcepts.org/creditriver.htm


    So Anna is an elected Judge of a common law court.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2016
  21. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The people have to create their own common law courts. In order to do that they have to claim their on the land State as their home and not be US inc residents, citizens.

    If we want to live under that system of law, we have to do the same thing. CHOOSE to live under Common Law, form a jural assembly for our communities as brilliantly summarized by the Michigan Jural Assembly which has already had their Common Law System in place for decades, elect judges to fill the vacant judicial offices, and live accordingly.

    I have not done any of this, I'm too old and have paid into SS all my life and I'm collecting now and now they tell me that it's a welfare program. When I signed up it was because my prospective employer said he could not hire me unless I had a SS number and it was a retirement program.

    So do I hate the gov, you bet I do as they are a bunch of the lyingest thieves and crooks with staffs of lieyers and con-artists.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2016
  22. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Common Law v. Admiralty Law

    Our Forefathers CHOSE the system of Common Law based on the Law of Moses (Ten Commandments) as the Law of the Land and they chose men to serve as judges from among themselves in every county, state, and region.

    If we want to live under that system of law, we have to do the same thing. CHOOSE to live under Common Law, form a jural assembly for our communities as brilliantly summarized by the Michigan Jural Assembly which has already had their Common Law System in place for decades, elect judges to fill the vacant judicial offices, and live accordingly.

    This is the way this country was set up and so far as I am concerned, the way it is still supposed to run. Those who don't want to accept that are outlaws. Those who do are law abiding. Simple as that.

    We are free to accept, amend, and reject laws within that system as every jury sees fit. That is why we have JURY NULLIFICATION built into this whole process.

    ANY law passed by ANY legislative body in the Common Law System can be nullified by a body of twelve honest Americans sitting as a jury. Such a jury can rewrite a law they find unfair or impractical or they can utterly reject one they find unjust, vague, or unworkable.

    Jury nullification is where the average people called to jury duty get to enforce their will on the entire system--- in Common Law, that is. Also, in Common Law, the judge serves the people-- he doesn't tell them what to do. He doesn't interpret the law. The jury does that. He listens to the arguments along with the jury, maintains fair rules of evidence and argument, asks questions, but at the end of the day, the JURY makes their own decision and the judge executes their sentence.

    That is also why there is no appeal from a jury trial unless substantial new evidence likely to have changed their reasoning comes to light. The JURY interprets and speaks the law under Common Law and what they decide becomes the law, no ifs, ands, or buts.

    The judge is just a referee and servant of the court and the clerk is just that, a clerk keeping good records of the proceedings and testimony, evidence and filings.

    There are other marked characteristics of Common Law that you need to be aware of; Under Common Law, nobody can be summoned to a court without a presentment from a Grand Jury.

    Under Common Law, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    Under Common Law, there has to be an actual, identifiable injured party--- someone has to stand up and accuse you of harming them or their own property.

    The only exception is in the case of murder or disabling injury of a victim, such that the injured party cannot bring suit for themselves.

    There is no such thing as a "victimless crime" under Common Law.

    The Judges in Common Law, (or, to use their proper name, Justices) are not necessarily graduates of any Law School and they cannot be members of the Bar Association, rather, they are respected members of their community who are trusted to make fair decisions about rules of evidence and argument and to oversee courtroom proceedings so as to guarantee a fair trial.

    That's really their only function, because remember--- under Common Law --- the people sitting on the jury make all the decisions. The Justice is just there to organize things properly and impose a level playing field for both sides to get a fair hearing of the issues.

    This is the system that we are heir to once we clearly decide to adopt our birthright status as American State Nationals.

    But this is NOT the system that we have been living under for the last umpteen years, because we have all been "mistaken on purpose" as "citizens of the United States" instead.

    That phrase, a "citizen of the United States" means in the words of Kitchens v. Steele, "a citizen of the federal government". And the federal government is defined as a corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES.

    Such "citizens" live under the international law of the sea, not the Common Law.

    In their courts the judge is all-powerful and juries are rubber stamps for him.

    The judge interprets the law in these admiralty courts, tells the jury what to think, tells the jury what they may or may not consider as evidence, tells the jury everything but how to wipe their noses.

    Their courts operate just as everyone can see them operating---- as prejudicial military tribunals where everyone is considered guilty until proven innocent and where no constitutional guarantees apply.

    In their courts, there are endless codes and statutes and regulatory infractions and abundant cases of victimless crimes.

    The majority of cases in such courts never present an actual injured party and both plaintiffs and defendants are represented by attorneys acting as Third Parties giving hearsay evidence that would be immediately thrown out of any Common Law court.

    You all know or should know that you are supposed to be operating as people on the land and not as persons on the sea. The Preamble of the Constitution doesn't read, "We, the Persons....."

    If you are going to live as free people you also have cause to know that you have choices to make both about your political status -- "people" or "person", Common Law or Admiralty or some other law form entirely--- and that you are then also required then to know how your chosen system of law works.

    You are being misidentified and mischaracterized as "citizens of the United States" with "United States" defined as "territories and District of Columbia" and you are being treated as "persons" because you aren't standing up and declaring your allegiance to your lawful state of the Union and you aren't filling your vacated public offices and running your own American Common Law Courts.

    Mulligan Ex Parte very clearly states that wherever our American Common Law Courts are up and operating, the admiralty courts must cease operating as military tribunals and revert to their proper place as courts merely concerned with actual maritime contracts and other admiralty issues.

    These foreign international courts which are doing so much damage to our property and our people are merely opportunists filling a gap that we left open through ignorance. When our courts stand on the land, their courts cannot usurp--- but when we allow our Common Law Court System to stand vacant, the cat is away and the rats can play.

    I can hear some people asking--- what do you mean, our courts are vacant? How? When? Why?

    It's simple, really, It happened through ignorance and pen strokes and greed.

    The moment you incorporate anything, it leaves the jurisdiction of the land and sets sail on the international jurisdiction of the sea. So the simple act of incorporating a county government changes its jurisdiction and its character and its law form.

    It never mattered if the "federal government" acted as a corporation because all of its duties assigned by the actual Constitution were international in nature. They were assigned and limited to international jurisdiction and under international law from the start.

    The state and county governments on the other hand, are responsible for operating the land jurisdiction. That's why our states and counties are geographically defined and the reason that they all have borders.

    But back in the 1960's all those organizations that were entrusted with running the state and county governments at that time were seduced by the lure of "Federal Revenue Sharing"---- a cut of the kickbacks from federal racketeering--- into signing up as incorporated franchises of the federal government--- that is, as franchises of the federal corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC.

    Now, just because all those organizations took the bait and obligated themselves and incorporated themselves and agreed to act as franchises (like Dairy Queen franchises) does NOT mean that you can't form your own unincorporated state and county governments to do the job you still need done. The important word here is: "unincorporated".

    The land and Law of the Land and people are all part of the unincorporated Body Politic. The international jurisdiction is entirely foreign to us.

    You have to elect Sheriffs to represent the land jurisdiction and to enforce the actual Constitution and Organic Laws, because with the stroke of a pen back in the 1960's, the Sheriff of the newly incorporated "County" became a law enforcement officer concerned with statutes and regulations and code enforcement instead. He stopped working for you, and started working for the local federal goverment corporation franchise instead.

    Your Common Law Court System which had existed since the early 1600's disappeared, too. Why? Because the people then operating the courts, back circa 1950 to 1965, incorporated them as part of the newly incorporated state and county franchise operations, and thereby converted our courts into an admiralty court system instead.

    If you want your Common Law Court System back and functioning and want to send these foreign admiralty courts packing, you have to set your county and state courts up as unincorporated Jural Assemblies. Thankfully, there have always been Americans who stayed awake.

    The Michigan Jural Assembly organized their state and kept it organized through thick and thin. The Nation States Project came forward and filed its claim to Pennsylvania. The Union States Assembly kept the fires burning on the Eastern Seaboard. In Texas, in Colorado, in Florida, in Wisconsin, in New Mexico, in California and throughout the land---- by Townships and Parishes and even Home Owner Associations--- Americans have kept their local governments alive and denied the corporate interlopers any claim of "exclusive legislative jurisdiction".

    And now that more and more people are waking up and realizing just how far down the tubes things have gotten without their participation, Americans are stepping forward by the millions and doing what needs to be done.

    Ignorant men have raised objections to what I and Bruce Doucette and Gary Darby and many other Americans are doing by occupying the vacated offices and acting as judges serving the American Common Law Court System. They think that we are somehow impersonating offices in the admiralty court system, which is obviously and abundantly untrue.

    They also think that we have to be members of the Bar Associations---- when in fact we can't be members of the Bar and serve in any American Common Law Court office whatsoever.

    They think that we are offering to oppress them in some way or establish an additional unwanted or improper authority over them, but the fact is that they have the same choice they have always had---- they can function as "persons" and submit themselves to international admiralty law, or they can function as "people" and submit themselves to the law of the land.

    We are simply choosing our traditional law form and organizing ourselves to provide Common Law Court services for the land jurisdiction of these United States, and thereby exercising a prerogative that has always been ours.

    Each one of us has the ability and responsiblity to choose our political status and our form of law and to act accordingly. It would be just as wrong for us to force anyone to act as one of the "people" of these United States as it would be wrong for them to force us to act as a "person" under international admiralty law.

    Which is the whole point.

    They are free to identify themselves as "citizens of the United States" with "United States" defined as "territories and District of Columbia". They can operate as "persons" if they want to adopt that status and they can incorporate federal franchise "STATES" to serve their needs. We won't stop them.

    And by the same stroke, we can identify ourselves as members of the "free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States" ----- these United States of Wisconsin, Oregon, Texas, and so on, which are the actual organic states of the Union, and we can operate our lawful government owed to the land jurisdiction of this country to serve our needs.

    Recently, there has been a flap with the ironically named "National Liberty Alliance" and its leadership. They have ignorantly and falsely accused us of "insurrection". If anyone is guilty of insurrection against these United States, it is those presently operating admiralty courts on our soil and practicing personage-for-profit against the people of this country.

    We, the people, are the living, actual, factual government of the people, for the people, and by the people. There is no such government of the person, for the person, and by the person-- a fact that those who adopt "personhood' should consider carefully and well.

    http://1stmichiganassembly.info/index.php


    http://annavonreitz.com/commonvadmiralty.pdf
    http://www.annavonreitz.com/
     
  23. mtnman

    mtnman Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,444
    Likes Received:
    5,024
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired Shipyard Machinist
    Location:
    East Tennessee
    I'm probably wrong but I was taught and from 20 years in a shipyard, Admiralty law deals with maritime problems. If your floating or sinking you have Admiralty law. If you're on dry land Admiralty law has no jurisdiction.
     
  24. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is correct, but the Federal gov which has no jurisdiction on the land is using it's on the sea jurisdiction in their courts of Admiralty. All the courts today are Federal.
     
  25. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,295
    Likes Received:
    2,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    Idk as I would say they are all federal but then there could be something I missed. I know they all conform to some set of standards but all county courts do practice what they call local laws or rules so even here in Oregon they are all a bit different. On thing is for sure thou they all have dun and Bradstreet numbers so they are for profit just like the federal stuff.

    I was given a link to get inside the d&b data base/server but I went back years later to look something up and it was closed down :thumbs down: that's what I thought about it.
     
  26. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Elected by who? When did this election take place, where did it take place and who was eligible to vote? I don't believe you. I think you made up that election. Show me anything that even hints to the fact that there was a real election.
     
  27. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Alaska State nationals of Big Lake Alaska elected Anna.

    Ignorant men have raised objections to what I and Bruce Doucette and Gary Darby and many other Americans are doing by occupying the vacated offices and acting as judges serving the American Common Law Court System. They think that we are somehow impersonating offices in the admiralty court system, which is obviously and abundantly untrue.

    They also think that we have to be members of the Bar Associations---- when in fact we can't be members of the Bar and serve in any American Common Law Court office whatsoever.

    They think that we are offering to oppress them in some way or establish an additional unwanted or improper authority over them, but the fact is that they have the same choice they have always had---- they can function as "persons" and submit themselves to international admiralty law, or they can function as "people" and submit themselves to the law of the land.

    We are simply choosing our traditional law form and organizing ourselves to provide Common Law Court services for the land jurisdiction of these United States, and thereby exercising a prerogative that has always been ours.

    Each one of us has the ability and responsiblity to choose our political status and our form of law and to act accordingly. It would be just as wrong for us to force anyone to act as one of the "people" of these United States as it would be wrong for them to force us to act as a "person" under international admiralty law.

    Which is the whole point.

    They are free to identify themselves as "citizens of the United States" with "United States" defined as "territories and District of Columbia". They can operate as "persons" if they want to adopt that status and they can incorporate federal franchise "STATES" to serve their needs. We won't stop them.

    And by the same stroke, we can identify ourselves as members of the "free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States" ----- these United States of Wisconsin, Oregon, Texas, and so on, which are the actual organic states of the Union, and we can operate our lawful government owed to the land jurisdiction of this country to serve our needs.

    Recently, there has been a flap with the ironically named "National Liberty Alliance" and its leadership. They have ignorantly and falsely accused us of "insurrection". If anyone is guilty of insurrection against these United States, it is those presently operating admiralty courts on our soil and practicing personage-for-profit against the people of this country.

    We, the people, are the living, actual, factual government of the people, for the people, and by the people. There is no such government of the person, for the person, and by the person-- a fact that those who adopt "personhood' should consider carefully and well.

    http://1stmichiganassembly.info/index.php
     
  28. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is interesting since Big Lake doesn't have a court system. Big Lake is considered a "census-designated place", which means that it is a place with a population but isn't incorporated and doesn't have a local government. It isn't a county, city, town, or even village. It is a vague area that has some people living in it.

    So what exactly is she the judge of? If the people of Big Lake were voting for someone, it would be a part of Matanuska-Susitna Borough, which Big Lake is part of. However, when I look up the Superior Court and district court judges that are associated with the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, she isn't there.

    So what exactly is she a judge of? When did this election take place? If you want us to accept that she isn't a make believe judge, who is fraudulently using the title judge to trick people into thinking she is qualified to give legal opinions, then please give us some kind of evidence that she is a judge of a real place, and some evidence that an election of some type actually took place. Because I looked, and I can't find any evidence of an election. By all appearances she just named her self judge.
     
  29. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    127,493
    Likes Received:
    37,425
    Trophy Points:
    113

    You may be correct:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/admiralty

    What is Maritime Law and what is its function..??
    http://shippingandfreightresource.com/what-is-maritime-law-and-what-is-its-function/

    Edit:

    Video: How Maritime Law Works
    http://gcaptain.com/video-how-maritime-law-works/
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2016
  30. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well I would guess, that there are about 3 Alaska State national's in theBig Lake area. How many electors do you need to be elected?

    Can One be an Elector?

    Are there any rules against One as an elector?

    It is quite clear that the law of the Land jurisdiction is American Common Law.
    And as such our Common Law has elected Justices of the Peace, that are reffered to as Judges. The real Judge in a common law court is the Jury and the Judge is just a referee, to keep the decorum of the court and balance the opposing views.

    In Minnesota we had Justices of the Peace in every township and I believe every town. That's a lot of Judges.
     
  31. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are 2,635 people living in the Big Lake area. Obviously if you exclude the entire population from that area then that isn't a legitimate election. Three people coming together and declaring one of them self a judge without telling anyone else is a joke.

    You have any idea how dishonest it is that you called her an elected judge when it was just one person voting them self to be it? Especially when I said that is what happened, and you said I was wrong and that she was elected. She is not a real judge and she was never elected by the people. She is a fantasy judge and in her fantasy world, she is a dictator who clearly doesn't give a shit about anyone's right. She is also an idiot who doesn't know anything about actual law.

    Except she isn't even a justice of the peace. She has no authority, no position, no power of any kind what so ever. You sure have some balls to say I am spinning bullshit, when you are posting this utter trash.

    She is a judge! Because she is a justice of the peace that voted herself into office in a one person election, in which no one living in the area knew about. Come on. This level of delusion isn't healthy.
     
  32. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Anna invited all of the people in her Jurisdiction and only 3 showed up does that disqualify her?

    How many people know that they can be State nationals?

    Do you deny that people have that choice?

    How many US Citizens are tricked into that status... I know I was and I believe most everyone else was. There certainly was no full disclosure coming from the gov indoctrination centers called school or in any of the myriad of contracts the gov induces us to sign up for.

    If I had been fully informed about my choices 60 years ago I would have retained my Minnesota State National status and I believe most of my fellow Minnesotans would also opt for that choice.

    The level of deception of "our" gov and people like you are staggering and revolting and one of the reasons we are in the predicament of run away budgets, accompanied by crime at every level of the gov.

    Dictator who has commanded what?

    She is informing the people of choices the gov has tried to bury and you are also trying to bury.

    The People would be much better off under a system of law that they control than under the system you advocate for.

    I think she knows much more about the law than a twerp like you. Here you are spinning more of your brand of BS.


    You love spinning BS, without being specific about where she errs in points of law. Maybe you could be specific... I doubt it.

    The American People are owed the truth, something "our" lying gov and it's agents like you are good at hiding and trying to shut those up who are bringing it to the people.
     
  33. arminius

    arminius Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    3,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    420 healer
    Location:
    right here right now
    LOL, this is exactly what I think of everything you write.

    What the hell are you doing here anyway?
     
    TRYNEIN and Bigjon like this.
  34. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What happened to the idea of us being natural born free people? Now we have to file special paperwork to have rights? That is how you can justify excluding everyone living in that area from getting a vote? It seems your made up system is a hundred times worse than what you pretend the government is doing now. In your system, virtually no one gets representation.



    Obviously not. She doesn't have the first clue about law. And apparently you don't even know what elections are.




    Umm the entire thing? I already gave you specifics. 1. She declared herself judge even though no one voted for her, and she doesn't represent anyone. 2. Admiralty law doesn't apply, everyone on both sides agree with this. Yet for some reason you pretend that it does so you can criticize it. 3. The US constitution establishes a federal government. That is clearly written in the constitution, despite you people being unable to read basics sentences and claim otherwise. 4. None of this stuff actual works in any way what so ever. All it does is get people arrested.


    You are an idiot. If you don't believe me, try asking a real lawyer. Not a fake made up one that declared them self judge. Find one that actually studied law. One that has actually read the US constitution would be nice as well. Nothing coming out your mouth even remotely resembles reality, and the fact that you think it is legit for someone to declare them self a judge, shows how warped your view of reality is.

    I come here to talk to the adults on the forum. I know I get distracted a lot by little kids like you, it is one of my bigger flaws. When I see someone acting like a retard I can't help but try to educate them a little. I know it is hopeless for people like you, but I got to try.
     
  35. arminius

    arminius Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    3,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    420 healer
    Location:
    right here right now
    As much of a maroon as you are, it's only obvious to me that you are here not to educate, but to confuse the issues even further with your slimy kiss ass to tptb issues.

    TPTB need to confuse issues such as gold and constitutional republic with democracy and fake fiat frickin money.

    And I can't see anyone with your intellectual bent, and prodigious forum output, on this forum to be anything but a nasty little troll who is making money from tptb trying to fuck up our civilization further.
     
  36. arminius

    arminius Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    3,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    420 healer
    Location:
    right here right now
    I really do my best not to hate, but such as the above would be a prime candidate if I could...
     
  37. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That pretty much proves you are not here to learn anything. You are here to post stuff and have everyone agree with you, which is why you get so upset when people disagree with you, and even more upset when they prove the bullshit you are trying to pass off makes no sense.

    Only on this forum could a person say that an election with only a single voter that was done in secret without the consent of the entire population of an area, is utterly illegitimate, and have some asshole call them a shill for it. The fact that this person made up their own fake title and started calling them self it to scam people is beyond question. Pointing it out shouldn't be even remotely controversial, as it is obvious to anyone with half a brain that you can't have a secret election where no one is allowed to vote, and call that legitimate.
     
  38. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is a real good question, but you left out a word, Sovereign.
    What happened to the free sovereign American people?
    They got run over by a bunch of lying thugs like you. They got converted to Persons defined as corporations.

    Judge Anna is trying to show the way back to our sovereign status as members of the people of the several States of America.

    The way has been obscured by lying thugs like you.



    Well we can't vote in your elections without first declaring to be a US Citizen in order to be able to register, so you limit the field of perspective voters. As a non-US Citizen I can't vote in your elections,
    Judge Anna meets the requirements to be a Judge of the common law Superior Court of Alaska State.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2016
  39. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,023
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Notice to all Members of the British Accreditation Registry [B.A.R.]~Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
    Sep 4, 2015
    The Titles of Nobility Amendment to the actual Constitution has never been repealed. No member of the Bar Association can occupy any public office of the Continental United States, including judge, including juror.
    The presence of a Bar Member involved in any proceedings, court or otherwise, automatically voids those proceedings with respect to the land and actual assets of the Continental United States—- that is, real Grand Juries.
    So, if you are a Bar Member acting under a nom de guerre, be advised that the only way you can continue your current activities without eventually being arrested and tried as an Undeclared Foreign Agent, is to tear up your Bar Card and swear allegiance to your birth State and the Continental United States—and faithfully carry through on it.
    The truth, whatever the truth is, will out.

    This reminder also applies to Bar Association Members who are now involved in the Grand Jury process. The Grand Juries that already exist are serving your jurisdiction— the jurisdiction of the Federal United States. The Grand Juries that are being created now by grassroots effort are specifically Grand Juries serving the Continental United States.
    In other words the People’s Grand Juries belong to a different Court System and a different jurisdiction entirely, and any interference from or co-option by a Bar Member could be taken as an act of war against protected persons— a hanging offense.
    It is therefore necessary for all Bar Association Members to be fully aware of this prohibition on their participation in public office and that the People’s Grand Jury referenced as the proverbial “Fourth Branch of Government” must act within the purview of the People’s Court which existed throughout the Colonies prior to the Revolution and which has continued to exist ever since.
    It is not just an “extra Grand Jury” to feed cases into the existing system. It is part and parcel of an entire Court System that is separate and off-limits to the Bar.

    Judge Anna Maria Riezinger, all rights reserved.

    Alaska State Superior Court — the only court operating on the land jurisdiction of Alaska — the only public court in Alaska.
     
  40. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently you don't believe US citizens are sovereign citizens, and they have to file special paperwork to be sovereign in order to be free? You have to file paperwork...to be free? What kind of fucked up fantasy world are you living in?

    That is hilarious. The little fascist over here doesn't believe anyone has rights unless they follow his personal rules, which no one agreed to or want. Then says we are thugs.


    No she doesn't. A government in which no one recognizes isn't a real government. It has no power and no authority. She can't make up her own laws and then elect herself to some position. That isn't how reality works.

    For the sake of argument, lets pretend all the stuff you said is true, and not a crazy fantasy that is all made up in your mind. Even if that was true, the fact that 99.99% of the population recognizes the the US government and does not recognize your fake government, means the US government is the legitimate one, and your is illegitimate one. So even if you were right, which you are not, you would still be wrong. Because your pretend government and pretend laws isn't followed by the vast majority of people. You apparently don't even recognize these other people, and refuse to allow them to vote.

    Looks like your pretend make believe world isn't going so well, is it?
     

Share This Page