1. Finally, a week without a .gov holiday, oil catching a bid on hope
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Good Monday Morning! Gold starts the week down 1.5 to 1256, while Silver is flat at 18.34. Crude is up 50 to 5449. The USD is flat at 101.06
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 2/25/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1258.30-- UP 19.20 Silver $18.33-- UP 30 Oil $53.99-- UP 21 USD $101.09 -- UP 14 tics Based on near term futures contract--- At JMB Current price AGE 2017 $1309.66 (1), SAE $21.82 (20)

A place to start learning

Discussion in 'Beginner's Forum' started by Goldhedge, Apr 1, 2010.



  1. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Note: The beginner's forum is for learning. I thought it would be nice to have pertinent posts
    located in an easy to find location. There is a lot of slogging through the trenches one has to
    do to learn. This forum is the result of that thought.

    Some of these posts may border on the edge. Check them out and decide for yourself.

    PLEASE PLEASE do NOT POST in the beginner's forum your "Hi! I finally made it on the board!"
    or other first time posts. Do that here: http://www.goldismoney2.com/forumdisplay.php?64-Hello!-New-Member-Incoming.

    If you happen to find a bad link...please send me a PM (click on my name) and let me know.

    Thank you....Gh

    "When the student is ready...the teacher will appear." Buddhist proverb

    Law Dictionaries
    http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvier.htm

    Blacks
    http://blackslawdictionaryonline.com/blacks-law-dictionary-read-online/

    http://dictionary.law.com/

    credits:... all of these posts I 'collected' from the other site
    from members who posted them in earnest...


    ...as before to keep you sane the Joke of the Day thread
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2012
    Milehi likes this.
  2. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    This is a good place to understanding

    Take the RED pill picture-24980.gif
    Deprogram Your Self

    THE ACTIVIST
    "It starts like an itch, something happens in our lives that causes us to question what we know. We open our eyes and seek the truth, and the more we uncover, the hungrier we are for understanding. But the world isn’t perfect, and there’s a lot of pain and deception. We have the burning desire to do more. We read, a lot. We start protesting. Our family labels us as too negative, our friends start to pull away, our spouses reject us. We're labeled hippies, anarchists, angry kids, conspiracy theorists and terrorists. We're beaten by police and mocked by the news. Yet, we have become obsessed with spreading the truth, and it becomes a very solitary journey."

    Read here about Nationality

    http://www.pacinlaw.org/nationality/



    www.1215.info
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2015
  3. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Take the 16:45min to see this.

    He gets a bit emphatic as it goes, but can you blame him?

    Then go to "Documents/E-Books" section of this site and read!

    http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2010
    Spoiler likes this.
  4. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    As you are aware, our country and our Common Law comes from England

    Why should it be any different here?

    No Consent = No Rule

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  5. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2010
  6. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Bill Moyers exposed the secret government of the USA in this 1987 report.
    The documentary shows how Iraq happened and what’s going on with Iran, our
    Constitution, Foreign Policy and Democracy. This is a must see!

    Here is the link
    The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, by Bill Moyers

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  7. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    BANKING

    The beginning of the FED ~ the Pujo Hearings

    I am a corporate paralegal who did a lot of white collar crime cases.
    5 years ago I worked on a separate project involving the formation
    of the FED - I believe in going to the original sources, so I by-passed
    the current literature.

    I pulled up the original proceedings of Congress from the Records and
    went into the NY Times microfische.

    You should probably read the NY Time Microfishe Jan 1911 to Mar 1912

    It was front page news. What you were told about the FED is a lie. The
    NY Banks were under indictment - Federal marshals were trying to arrest
    them all - Rockefeller took off for South America

    They hijacked the U.S. Treasury from 1850 to 1911 - the funds from the
    treasury were transferred to their vaults thru industrial contracts - they
    cooked the books when they built the railroads and all the utilities

    They walked off with the treasury - The Congressional Hearings were
    called the Puju Hearings - they erased all the media and news about
    these hearings - you have to go to the original source for information.

    Wilson stopped the investigation and the hearings, and lifted the arrest
    warrants. Then they steamrollered the whole nation, and allowed the NY
    Banks to keep the money - and to make the financial decisions for the nation.

    The reasoning was that they had built all this industry, therefore they "knew
    what they were doing" - It's pretty pathetic.

    I had to pull up additional information about how they transitioned us from
    a cash economy to a credit - reliant economy - that was pretty clever.

    They went to Stanford University and dreamed up a credit scoring system -
    FICO - that DOES NOT calculate anyone's ability to sustain debt - they
    constructed the equation and the metrics so that nobody would question it

    It's essentially like when you buy a new car, and the saleman, sits with a
    calculator punching numbers, and then gives you an offer - he's not
    calculating anything - he's intimidating you and trying to get you to buy
    into his "formula" - it's a smokescreen

    FICO is based on an old loan sharking scheme popular during the Depression -
    and made illegal. When FICO first came to Congress in 1967, Congress threw
    them out - then FICo came back with a re-draft and lobbied their way thru

    Nixon signed the bill during Watergate - but there is some suspicion that the
    bill was never passed by Congress - and Congress never approved FICO- they
    gave FICO some alternate legislation - that is the FCRA 1971 - it does not
    approve FICO - it puts a legitimate face on FICO

    If you rid the banks of FICO, and go back to the pre-1971 banking laws, you'll
    turn the economy around.

    Posted by: shari at September 28, 2009 06:09 PM

    While FICO is far from perfect, it needs to be replaced with a better system
    before you get rid of it. With today's technology, there should be a far better
    way to determine how much debt a consumer (or couple) can reasonably
    support versus a system that looks to find fault with a customer's payment
    history so the banks, credit card companies, and auto dealers can profit from
    there mistakes. Banks will put up a tremendous fight if anyone introduces a
    better way as FICO is a cash cow.

    Getting rid of FICO without a suitable replacement probably wouldn't help
    the current economic situation. Instead, the consumer greed that fueled
    the current situation would probably be worsened as their access to money
    would once again be easier.

    http://www.thealarmclock.com/mt/archives/2009/09/not_even_the_fe.html


    This is by subscription if interested...

    Access to NY Times historical index
    http://www.libraryjournal.com/blog/1100000310/post/1700049570.html
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2011
  8. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2010
  9. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  10. Zilver

    Zilver Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    in The Twilight Zone
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Founding Fathers On The Threat Of Tyranny

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  11. Zilver

    Zilver Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    in The Twilight Zone
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Democracy Is One Step Closer To Oligarchy
    (Republic vs Democracy )
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
    Thecrensh and Weatherman like this.
  12. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2010
  13. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Money as Debt

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  14. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  15. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Fiat Empire - Why the Federal Reserve Violates the U.S. Constitution

    [video=google;5232639329002339531]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5232639329002339531#[/video]
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2010
  16. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  17. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  18. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  19. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    What is the Federal Reserve?

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  20. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    The American People can close the Federal Reserve

    When Congress borrows money on the credit of the United States, bonds are thus legislated into existence and deposited as credit entries in Federal Reserve banks. United States bonds, bills and notes constitute money as affirmed by the Supreme Court (Legal Tender Cases, 110 U.S. 421), and this money when deposited with the Fed becomes collateral from whence the Treasury may write checks against the credit thus created in its account (12 USC 391). For example, suppose Congress appropriates an expenditure of $1 billion. To finance the appropriation Congress creates the $1 billion worth of bonds out of thin air and deposits it with the privately owned Federal Reserve System. Upon receiving the bonds, the Fed credits $1 billion to the Treasury's checking account, holding the deposited bonds as collateral. When the United States deposits its bonds with the Federal Reserve System, private credit is extended to the Treasury by the Fed. Under its power to borrow money, Congress is authorized by the Constitution to contract debt, and whenever something is borrowed it must be returned. When Congress spends the contracted private credit, each use of credit is debt which must be returned to the lender or Fed. Since Congress authorizes the expenditure of this private credit, the United States incurs the primary obligation to return the borrowed credit, creating a National Debt which results when credit is not returned.

    However, if anyone else accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS and delivered to the Federal Reserve banksters. Actually the federal income tax imparts two separate obligations: the obligation to file a return and the obligation to abide by the Internal Revenue Code. The obligation to make a return of income for using private credit is recognized in law as an irrecusable obligation, which according to 'Bouvier's Law Dictionary' (1914 ed.), is "a term used to indicate a certain class of contractual obligations recognized by the law which are imposed upon a person without his consent and without regard to any act of his own." This is distinguished from a recusable obligation which, according to Bouvier, arises from a voluntary act by which one incurs the obligation imposed by the operation of law. The voluntary use of private credit is the condition precedent which imposes the irrecusable obligation to file a tax return. If private credit is not used or rejected, then the operation of law which imposes the irrecusable obligation lies dormant and cannot apply.

    In 'Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR Co.' 240 U.S. 1 (1916) the Supreme Court affirmed that the federal income tax is in the class of indirect taxes, which include duties and excises. The personal income tax arises from a duty -- i.e., charge or fee -- which is voluntarily incurred and subject to the rule of uniformity. A charge is a duty or obligation, binding upon him who enters into it, which may be removed or taken away by a discharge (performance): 'Bouvier', p. 459. Our federal personal income tax is not really a tax in the ordinary sense of the word but rather a burden or obligation which the taxpayer voluntarily assumes, and the burden of the tax falls upon those who voluntarily use private credit. Simply stated the tax imposed is a charge or fee upon the use of private credit where the amount of private credit used measures the pecuniary obligation. The personal income tax provision of the Internal Revenue Code is private law rather than public law. "A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals, associations, or corporations": 50 Am.Jur. 12, p.28. In the instant case the revenue code pertains to taxpayers. A private law can be enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction when statutes for its enforcement are enacted: 20 Am.Jur. 33, pgs. 58, 59. The distinction between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when published statutes are printed in their final form: Case v. Kelly, 133 U.S. 21 (1890). Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 Am.Jur. 35, p. 60. In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law. Federal Reserve banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act: Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank, 468 F.Supp. 674 (1979). A private act may be published as a public law when the general public is afforded the opportunity of participating in the operation of the private law. The Internal Revenue Code is an example of private law which does not exclude the voluntary participation of the general public. Had the Internal Revenue Code been written as substantive public law, the code would be repugnant to the Constitution, since no one could be compelled to file a return and thereby become a witness against himself. Under the fifty titles listed on the preface page of the United States Code, the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) is listed as having not been enacted as substantive public law, conceding that the Internal Revenue Code is private law. Bouvier declares that private law "relates to private matters which do not concern the public at large." It is the voluntary use of private credit which imposes upon the user the quasi contractual or implied obligation to make a return of income. In 'Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co.' 158 U.S. 601 (1895) the Supreme Court had declared the income tax of 1894 to be repugnant to the Constitution, holding that taxation of rents, wages and salaries must conform to the rule of apportionment. However, when this decision was rendered, there was no privately owned central bank issuing private credit and currency but rather public money in the form of legal tender notes and coins of the United States circulated. Public money is the lawful money of the United States which the Constitution authorizes Congress to issue, conferring a property right, whereas the private credit issued by the Fed is neither money nor property, permitting the user an equitable interest but denying allodial title.

    Today, we have two competing monetary systems. The Federal Reserve System with its private credit and currency, and the public money system consisting of legal tender United States notes and coins. One could use the public money system, paying all bills with coins and United States notes (if the notes can be obtained), or one could voluntarily use the private credit system and thereby incur the obligation to make a return of income. Under 26 USC 7609 the IRS has carte blanche authority to summon and investigate bank records for the purpose of determining tax liabilities or discovering unknown taxpayers: 'United States v. Berg' 636 F.2d 203 (1980). If an investigation of bank records discloses an excess of $1000 in deposits in a single year, the IRS may accept this as prima facie evidence that the account holder uses private credit and is therefore a person obligated to make a return of income. Anyone who uses private credit -- e.g., bank accounts, credit cards, mortgages, etc. -- voluntarily plugs himself into the system and obligates himself to file. A taxpayer is allowed to claim a $1000 personal deduction when filing his return. The average taxpayer in the course of a year uses United States coins in vending machines, parking meters, small change, etc., and this public money must be deducted when computing the charge for using private credit.

    On June 5, 1933, the day of infamy arrived. Congress on that date enacted House Joint Resolution 192, which provided that the people convert or turn in their gold coins in exchange for Federal Reserve notes. Through the operation of law, H.J.R. 192 took us off the gold standard and placed us on the dollar standard where the dollar could be manipulated by private interests for their self-serving benefit. By this single act the people and their wealth were delivered to the bankers. When gold coinage was thus pulled out of circulation, large denomination Federal Reserve notes were issued to fill the void. As a consequence the public money supply in circulation was greatly diminished, and the debt-laden private credit of the Fed gained supremacy. This action made private individuals who had been previously exempt from federal income taxes now liable for them, since the general public began consuming and using large amounts of private credit. Notice all the case law prior to 1933 which affirms that income is a profit or gain which arises from a government granted privilege. After 1933, however, the case law no longer emphatically declares that income is exclusively corporate profit or that it arises from a privilege. So, what changed? Two years after H.J.R. 192, Congress passed the Social Security Act, which the Supreme Court upheld as a valid act imposing a valid income tax: 'Charles C. Steward Mach. Co. v, Davis' 301 U.S. 548 (1937).

    It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding. This same fate befell the Kennedy half dollars, which circulated as silver sandwiched clads between 1965-1969 and were hoarded for their intrinsic value and not spent. Next came the Susan B. Anthony dollar, an awkward coin which was instantly rejected as planned. The remaining unit is the privately issued Federal Reserve note unit dollar with no viable competitors. Back in 1935 the Fed had persuaded the Treasury to discontinue minting silver dollars because the public preferred them over dollar bills. That the public money system has become awkward, discouraging its use, is no accident. It was planned that way.

    A major purpose behind the 16th Amendment was to give Congress authority to enforce private law collections of revenue. Congress had the plenary power to collect income taxes arising from government granted privileges long before the 16th Amendment was ratified, and the amendment was unnecessary, except to give Congress the added power to enforce collections under private law: i.e., income from whatever source. So, the Fed got its amendment and its private income tax, which is a banker's dream but a nightmare for everyone else. Through the combined operation of the Fed and H.J.R. 192, the United States pays exorbitant interest whenever it uses its own money deposited with the Fed, and the people pay outrageous income taxes for the privilege of living and working in their own country, robbed of their wealth and separated from their rights, laboring under a tax system written by a cabal of loan shark bankers and rubber stamped by a spineless Congress.

    Congress has the power to abolish the Federal Reserve System and thus destroy the private credit system. However, the people have it within their power to strip the Fed of its powers, rescind private credit and get the bankers to pay off the National Debt should Congress fail to act. The key to all this is 12 USC 411, which declares that Federal Reserve notes shall be redeemed in lawful money at any Federal Reserve bank. Lawful money is defined as all the coins, notes, bills, bonds and securities of the United States: 'Julliard v. Greenman' 110 U.S. 421, 448 (1884); whereas public money is the lawful money declared by Congress as a legal tender for debts (31 USC 5103); 524 F.2d 629 (1974). Anyone can present Federal Reserve notes to any Federal Reserve bank and demand redemption in public money -- i.e., legal tender United States notes and coins. A Federal Reserve note is a fixed obligation or evidence of indebtedness which pledges redemption (12 USC 411) in public money to the note holder. The Fed maintains a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts. However, should the general public decide to redeem large amounts of private credit for public money, a financial melt-down within the Fed would quickly occur. The process works like this. Suppose $1000 in Federal Reserve notes are presented for redemption in public money. To raise $1000 in public money the Fed must surrender U.S. Bonds in that amount to the Treasury in exchange for the public money demanded (assuming that the Fed had no public money on hand). In so doing $1000 of the National Debt would be paid off by the Fed and thus canceled. Can you imagine the result if large amounts of Federal Reserve notes were redeemed on a regular, ongoing basis? Private credit would be withdrawn from circulation and replaced with public money, and with each turning of the screw the Fed would be obliged to pay off more of the National Debt. Should the Fed refuse to redeem its notes in public money, then the fiction that private credit is used voluntarily would become unsustainable. If the use of private credit becomes compulsory, then the obligation to make a return of income is voided. If the Fed is under no obligation to redeem its notes, then no one has an obligation to make a return of income. It is that simple! Federal Reserve notes are not money and cannot be tendered when money is demanded: 105 So. 305 (1925). Moreover, the Ninth Circuit rejected the argument that a $50 Federal Reserve note be redeemed in gold or silver coin after specie coinage had been rescinded but upheld the right of the note holder to redeem his note in current public money (31 USC 392; rev., 5103): 524 F.2d 629 (1974); 12 USC 411.

    It would be advantageous to close out all bank accounts, acquire a home safe, settle all debts in cash with public money and use U.S. postal money orders for remittances. Whenever a check is received, present it to the bank of issue and demand cash in public money. This will place banks in a vulnerable position, forcing them to draw off their assets. Through their insatiable greed, bankers have over extended, making banks quite illiquid. Should the people suddenly demand public money for their deposits and for checks received, many banks will collapse and be foreclosed by those demanding public money. Banks by their very nature are citadels of usury and sin, and the most patriotic service one could perform is to obligate bankers to redeem private credit. When the first Federal Reserve note is presented to the Fed for redemption, the process of ousting the private credit system will commence and will not end until the Fed and the banking system nurtured by it collapse. Coins comprise less than five percent of the currency, and current law limits the amount of United States notes in circulation to $300 million (31 USC 5115). The private credit system is exceedingly over extended compared with the supply of public money, and a small minority working in concert can easily collapse the private credit system and oust the Fed by demanding redemption of private credit. If the Fed disappeared tomorrow, income taxes on wages and salaries would vanish with it. Moreover, the States are precluded from taxing United States notes: 4 Wheat. 316. According to Bouvier, public money is the money which Congress can tax for public purposes mandated by the Constitution. Private credit when collected in revenue can fund programs and be spent for purposes not cognizable by the Constitution. We have in effect two competing governments: the United States Government and the Federal Government. The first is the government of the people, whereas the Federal Government is founded upon private law and funded by private credit. What we really have is private government. Federal agencies and activities funded by the private credit system include Social Security, bail out loans to bankers via the IMF, bail out loans to Chrysler, loans to students, FDIC, FBI, supporting the U.N., foreign aid, funding undeclared wars, etc., all of which would be unsustainable if funded by taxes raised pursuant to the Constitution.

    The personal income tax is not a true tax but rather an obligation or burden which is voluntarily assumed, since revenue is raised through voluntary contributions and can be spent for purposes unknown to the Constitution. Notice how the IRS declares in its publications that everyone is expected to contribute his fair share. True taxes must be spent for public purposes which the Constitution recognizes. Taxation for the purpose of giving or loaning money to private business enterprises and individuals is illegal: 15 Am.Rep. 39; Cooley, 'Prin. Const. Law', ch. IV. Revenue derived from the federal income tax goes into a private slush fund raised from voluntary contributions, and Congress is not restricted by the Constitution when spending or disbursing the proceeds from this private fund. It is incorrect to say that the personal federal income tax is unconstitutional, since the tax code is private law and resides outside the Constitution. The Internal Revenue Code is non-constitutional because it enforces an obligation which is voluntarily incurred through an act of the individual who binds himself. Fighting the Internal Revenue Code on constitutional grounds is wasted energy. The way to bring it all down is to attack the Federal Reserve System and its banking cohorts by demanding that private credit be redeemed, or by convincing Congress to abolish the Fed. Never forget that private credit is funding the destruction of our country.

    [Reprinted from `Freedom League', Sept/Oct 1984]

    ------------
    stamping the following on the back of a check and then endorsing
    will place the taxable FRN's into 'Public Money'. You may run into
    banks that don't 'understand' the law, so if they give you grief, you
    can change the wording to: "Redeemed for lawful money UCC 3-419".

    Make copies front/back and save.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jun 16, 2010
  21. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  22. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  23. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  24. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  25. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  26. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  27. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Home Schooling primer

    http://www.hslda.org/laws/default.asp

    the alternative to Public School indoctrination...um

    I mean 'socialization'... yeah that's it....
     
  28. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  29. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    A Jetgraphics post
    Before I delved into reading the law, I was confused, too. The propaganda ministry is quite thorough in scrambling our cognitive functions.

    [1] Citizenship is based on creation or submission to a government, in exchange for the "protections" it gives. In the case of the U.S.A., state or federal citizenship is distinct from the sovereign status of "people".

    [2] State governments do not have "rights" - only delegated powers. They may extend citizenship (political liberty) to whomever they wish. But they may not deny citizenship to those who have the privilege to assert it, pursuant to organic compacts or later amendments.

    [3] State governments are subjects of the Federal government, via the supremacy clause in Art. 6, U.S. Constitution. The people in the State, if not citizens, retain their sovereignty.


    References:

    Articles of Confederation (1777)

    Article I. The Stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America".

    Article II. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

    Please note: The 50 states united are the "United States of America".
    The "United States" (federal government) refers to Congress, and its two other branches - executive and judicial.

    Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states ...shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states ...
     
  30. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    "Government is not Sovereignty. Government is the machinery or expedient for expressing the will of the sovereign power."
    City of Bisbee v. Cochise County, 78 P. 2d 982, 986, 52 Ariz. 1

    "People are supreme, not the state."
    Waring v. the Mayor of Savannah, 60 GA at 93.

    "The people of the state, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the king by his own prerogative."
    Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, (NY)

    "At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people and they are truly the sovereigns of the country."
    Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, 463
    Note: The American people are sovereign. Do not confuse them with subject citizens.

    CITIZEN - ... Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associative capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of government for the promotion of the general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights.
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed. p.244

    SUBJECT - One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.
    ...Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government.
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1425

    "The term citizen as understood in our laws, is precisely analogous to the term subject in the common law, and the change of phrase has entirely resulted from the change of government. The sovereignty has been transferred from one man to the collective body of the people -- and he who before was a "subject of the King" is now a citizen of the State."
    State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144 (1838)
    (* NOTE: This "subject of the King" directly contradicts Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, (NY)... if you presume "citizens" = "people". But is resolved if you recall that those who exercise political liberty - citizenship - change from the republican form to the democratic form of government.
    City of Bisbee v. Cochise County points out that the servant government is the means to secure the rights of the people - who are the sovereigns. Citizens are subjects of the servant government, not vice versa.)

    "DEMOCRACY - That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy."
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, P. 432

    "GOVERNMENT (Republican Government)- One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated."
    - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, P. 695

    People who can directly exercise sovereignty are not constrained by the whole body of free citizenry. If they were so constrained, they'd cease to be sovereign. They would not have natural nor personal liberty.

    Citizens are obligated to perform civic duties (militia, jury, taxes), while free inhabitants are not obligated. This conforms to the Declaration of Independence, wherein governments have 2 jobs, (a) secure rights, and (b) govern those who consent. And only those who consent to be citizens are required to perform civic duties. If citizenship could be imposed at birth, then it would be involuntary servitude and unconstitutional.
    Ergo, the only Americans who are truly sovereign cannot be the subject citizens.

    Alteration of one's birthright occurs via three acts:
    (1) Assertion of U.S. citizenship,
    (2) Enrollment into Social Security (national socialism),
    (3) Opening an interest bearing personal account with an instrumentality of the Federal Reserve Corporation.

    American nationals, free inhabitants, domiciled upon their private property within the boundary of the United States of America (non-domestic), are the sovereign people that government serves. They retain their endowment, from their Creator, of natural and personal liberty.

    U.S. citizens, subject residents, residing at residences upon real estate within the "United States" (domestic), are subjects of the federal government, and lack natural and personal liberty. They only have civil and political liberty. If enrolled into national socialism, they are reduced to paupers at law, vagabonds, bankrupts, and status criminals - guilty until proven innocent.
     
  31. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Good post by Barnacle Bob

    UCC/Redemption Process
    by Barton Albert Buhtz
    Investigative Journalist and Consumer Advocate

    1. Is a birth certificate in itself an instrument, a promissory note or other negotiable instrument of commercial value?

    2. Is the birth certificate on record at a county and/or with a state a contract giving the state and ultimately the federal government control over all commercial aspects of the individual represented thereon?

    3. Does the filing of a Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Financing Statement, Addendum and/or Change Statement/Amendment encompass all commercial, civil and even criminal activity?

    4. Does following the steps of the "UCC/Redemption Process" result in getting some value through the Federal Government without any value being given in return?; and

    5. Is the "UCC Redemption Process" simply a ruse or trick that will only result in subsequent retaliation by government agencies against those who file and participate in this process?

    Most attorneys view the UCC from the perspective of litigation and adjudication. However, the UCC is legislated (Administrative Law) that codifies the rules for all commercial transactions between countries, states and individuals. The courts acknowledge they do not have the authority or jurisdiction to amend, alter or nullify any of the Articles of the UCC. They can only consider "gray areas" such as: Who holds the priority position? The party that filed the UCC first or the one who perfected first? The courts have addressed and determine in specific situations what can be considered a "fixture" as it relates to real property under the UCC.

    When one files a UCC form and it is recorded by a state's UCC office, that filing becomes a legal document of public record identifying the filer as the Secured Party. Hence no court can lawfully rule on the fact or existence of the filing itself. That filing is a legal fact. The employees of the UCC Department in each state are fiduciaries required to follow specific rules and procedures. If a UCC filing meets the specifications of those rules and procedures the document is to be recorded. There are minor variations in the UCC subsections from state to state and even country to country, but the bulk of the commercial rules and procedures are universal and uniform. Hence the designation Uniform Commercial Code.

    UCC filing offices are located in each state of the union, in each of the territories and protectorates of the U.S. as well as in many foreign countries. Filing a UCC form is an administrative action that, when accepted and recorded by the UCC office, is stamped with a file number, date, hour and even minute of filing. The UCC Financing Statement (UCC-1) details a Secured Party's status in any commercial transaction according to the Articles of the UCC as well as various section of the United States Code dealing with "Property." Once a Secured party's UCC form has been filed it is a fact in public record that there is a secured, vested interest therein holding a superior claim and all other parties at interest who file thereafter must acknowledge, accept and respect the Secured Party's superior and prior position. Any changes filed thereafter by the Secured Party can be accomplished by filing an Amendment (UCC-3) referencing the original UCC filing. However, the facts are clear. The UCC deals with secured, vested interest and/or possession, never title. Title is another subject altogether.

    1. Is the Birth Certificate itself a commercial instrument, a Promissory Note or other negotiable instrument of value?

    The answer is an emphatic NO! However, the authorization to prepare a Certificate of Live Birth is given in the form of an application signed by the parents and/or the doctor that is in form and substance a commercial contract. A local or state birth certificate is simply evidence that a commercial contract has been entered into making the newborn a ward of the "state." Within two weeks and three days the Certificate of Live Birth based on that application is delivered and filed in Washington, D.C. Furthermore, it is a bonded instrument. On the back of the document is a letter (A-N) followed by eight numbers. More recently issued Social Security Cards have a similar bond serial number stamped on the back.

    2. Is the Birth Certificate itself, originally prepared in the county of birth, a contract giving the state control over all aspects of the individual represented thereon?

    Again the answer is NO. A birth certificate is not a contract and has no value in and of itself except as evidence that a Certificate of Live Birth does exist. That Certificate is on file in the official records in Washington, D.C. and stands as incontrovertible evidence that there is a living, breathing man or woman whose existence has been registered with the state and with certain federal agencies. Records of foreign born are on file with a Certificate of Naturalization, Citizenship or other document authorizing their residence here. Public agencies designate the name on the document as a "person." The value placed on the Certificate of Live Birth is based on the ability of the "state" to tax the future assets of that "Debtor." A bond is taken out by the Department of the Treasury and a bond # is stamped on the back of the Certificate of Live Birth. Printouts of some Individual Master Files (IMF) reveal that bond to be about $650,000. One IRS Master File I saw lists an IRS Treasury Bond in the amount of $742,500 that the individual requester knew nothing about. However, all the profit generated by this investment between the birth and the death of the living, breathing man or woman is kept by the "state."

    1933 was a pivotal year for the United States government and the American people. History reveals that it took only 20 years after 1913, the year the Federal Reserve Act was "approved" by Congress for the United States (Corporate) to slip into debt and insolvency. The International Bankers served Notice of this fact on the government. Between January and July of 1933 the Roosevelt Administration and Congress responded. Exactly how all this was orchestrated is too lengthy to be addressed here, but this fact is clear - since then the birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is on file in the official records in Washington, D.C. and the property and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt. Information I have received from various government agencies indicates the filed Certificate of Live Birth documents themselves have specific instructions printed on the back stipulating by whom, to whom and in what time frame the document is to be created and delivered. First to the County Health Commissioner, followed by the Secretary of State and finally the Department of Commerce though the files are not maintained in their offices. Within two weeks and three days each Certificate of Live Birth is to be filed in D.C. Evidence reveals that there is even a Federal Children Department established by the Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that appears to be involved in this process in some way.

    I have seen IMFs that list commercial activity in the $billions assigned to individuals making around $50,000 per year! The government is using their name and assets to trade in drugs, crude oil and other commodities. This is just another example in evidence that all property, real and personal of every living American, is committed by Congress to back the National Debt. In 1933 Congress turned over control of all the post offices in D.C. to the Secretary of the Treasury. Why? That is how the money comes in especially around April 15! Read the 1933 Congressional record you will realize that the office of the Secretary of the Treasury is actually the keeper in the financial office of the United States (Corporate) to control the flow of all income to the U.S. so that the Creditor, the bankers who own the Federal Reserve, will receive their money. The salary of the Secretary, John W. Snow, is paid by the International Monetary Fund. "He who pays the piper calls the tune."

    According to government sources, well over twenty-five million UCC financing statements have been filed with UCC offices in many states. Corresponding commercial paperwork has been sent to the Secretary of the Treasury. These facts have been compiled through information obtained from the CID of the IRS, FBI, Secret Service, Justice Department, the Department of the Treasury and the Secretary of State. By their own admission not one properly filed UCC form has been rejected or criminally prosecuted.

    However, the revised UCC Articles, especially IX (effective July 1, 2001) imply that the UCC Financing Statement of the Secured Party applicant must be filed in the birth state or UCC Region. That recorded filing must then be included with a Charge-Back Instruction Notice, a 1040 ES form and a birth certificate with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary is the other Party at Interest. Thirdly, the Secured Party needs to file a UCC Financing Statement and Addendum with the UCC office in the "resident" state to protect assets there.

    Employees at the Department of the Treasury and the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS where the files are kept make it clear the birth certificate has no commercial value. However, government agents acknowledge that the Certificates of Live Birth do exist and are on file. Some have even admitted that the Application for the Birth Certificate does have commercial value based on the ability of government to tax the future earnings of the person represented by those documents. However, the applications are not on file in D.C. Research indicates they may well be either in Puerto Rico or Switzerland.

    The states, protectorates and D.C. have formed a National UCC Administration. They have partitioned the United States into six UCC Regions. If one UCC office within that region is not willing to accept for filing a properly worded UCC Financing Statement another UCC in that region will. One can record a regional filing in a UCC region state that is the same as filing in their birth state. If one is born outside the U.S., but is authorized to live here and hold a Social Security Card, they can file the UCC form in the state or region where they resided when they received such authorization.

    Specifically, research reveals that the UCC and other required paperwork filed with the birth state or region is logged in at the mailroom - 1500 Pennsylvania NW, Washington, D.C. This is the address of legal service for the Secretary of the Treasury. According to LaTanya Y. Wilson all UCC and Bill of Exchange documents are routed to the IRS - Room 1120, 1111 Constitution Ave - NW, Washington, D.C. 20224 under the administration of Felix Zech. This is the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS. These documents are scrutinized by the Secret Service, the FBI and Justice Department. Dolores Douglas at the Analysis and Control Division has stated that these are designated as "UCC Contract Trusts."

    The UCC Contract Trusts are distinct and separate from Direct Treasury Accounts used exclusively for trading in Treasury Bonds that are administered by the Bureau of Public Debt. I have learned that many of the UCC and Bill of Exchange documents received at 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW are misdirected to the BPD. One major error is that many filers reference a Treasury Direct or Direct Treasury account in their documents.

    At the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS Building in D.C. UCC Contract Trusts are processed and the paperwork is then routed to one of two IRS Centers. For east of the Mississippi they are routed to Cincinnati, Ohio. West of the River they are sent to Fresno, California. I have since learned that Notices discharging IRS claims east of the Mississippi are also to be sent to Joseph Kehoe - CSB/SPF of the IRS in D.C. West of the River they are to be sent to Gary Sterr - WRM/SPF - Seattle, Washington.

    Current reports indicate the UCC files and paperwork is scrutinized by the Secret Service, the Justice Department, FBI, routed to the CID, then to the IRS Technical Support Division (TSD) in the state from where the Secured Party initiated the discharge. A December 2002 memo from LaTanya Wilson notes that copies of these documents are also forwarded to Jeanean West at the Department of Justice, Tax Division in D.C.

    Here are some important details regarding the administration and function of the TSD:

    a. Almost every financial institution connected with the Federal Reserve System has in its register or has contracted access to an IRS account known as a Treasury Tax and Loan account (TTL).

    b. The TTL account in each financial institution is administered from the TSD office located in most state offices of the IRS. As a result of IRS internal reorganization the Technical Support Manager (TSM) in each State Divisional Office of the IRS has been assigned the authority formerly assigned to the District Director.

    c. When a "NOTICE of Levy/Lien" is presented to any financial institution by the IRS (usually by fax) the financial institution usually responds routinely by making a simple entry in their computer transferring the asset from the depositor's account to the IRS TTL account. THE ASSET DOES NOT PHYSICALLY LEAVE THEIR OFFICE. A few financial institutions do not have TTL accounts. They place a 21 day hold on the funds and then forward the amount demanded directly to the IRS.

    d. When a "Release of Levy/Lien" is issued by the IRS the financial institution makes an entry in the computer and transfers funds from the TTL account to the depositor's account if applicable. A properly prepared and filed UCC form on file with the bank can be an administrative preventative action a Secured Party can take to document prior, superior claim to those assets on deposit. See United Tobacco Warehouse vs. Wells (1973) and Diversified Metal Products vs. T-Bow Company Trust, IRS, et al (1993). Some banks will not accept UCC documents. Deposit the funds in a financial institution that will.

    Discharging claims in the public sector and with the IRS through the UCC Contract Trust can be accomplished by the Secured Party with presentment of Bonded Registered Bill of Exchange directly to the Secretary of the Treasury. When an assessment (claim) is made by the IRS, a federal or state taxing agency, the claim can be stamped "Accepted For Value" by the Secured Party and sent via Certified (or Registered) Mail to the Secretary of the Treasury for discharge. This action is documented and authorized through Public Policy HJR-192, Title IV, Sec. 401 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Supreme Court's confirmation in Guaranty Trust of New York vs. Henwood, et al (1939) and Public Law 73-10. Such action is further confirmed in USC Title XII, Title XXVIII, Sec. 1641, 3002 and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.

    Regarding the alleged commercial value of the birth certificate the following facts are clear:

    *Hundreds of thousands birth certificates referenced in UCC Financing Statements have been filed and stamped by numerous state UCC filing offices. Under the revised Article (Chapter) IX of the UCC (July 1, 2001) such filers had until June 30, 2002 to re file the UCC-1 with their birth state. By referencing their original filing they could protect the earlier filing date that, then, would be filed with the Secretary of the Treasury. Failure to do so, however, by July 1, 2002 would result in losing their original filing date and their status as the Secured Party with the Secretary of the Treasury.

    *The Department of the Treasury acknowledges that UCC filings by millions of Secured Parties have been routed to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS in D.C. Not one, to my knowledge has been criminally prosecuted. We have been told that many are in limbo because the files are not complete.

    *Thousands of discharge documents have been presented to the Secretary of the Treasury, routed to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS for processing and not one has been criminally prosecuted.

    All of the foregoing reveals that those who have properly filed UCC documents in the Redemption Process have not committed any crime according to the Department of the Treasury, the Secret Service, the Department of Justice and the IRS.

    3. Does the filing of UCC Financing statements and Change/Amendments encompass all commercial, civil and even criminal actions?

    According to numerous government sources all commercial transactions in the U.S. and many other countries come under the Legislated (Administrative) Law known as the Uniform Commercial Code. These transactions all become "bonded" when they are processed through the Federal Reserve System and/or the Department of the Treasury. The courts do claim jurisdiction for commercial transactions that appear criminal. The UCC Articles themselves are Administrative Law and not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts and litigation.

    Over the past number of years I have had contact with those who have stated they have received proof from Department of Commerce documents that their Certificates of Live Birth are being used as commercial instruments. A detailed investigation by Carl Erickson has revealed some startling facts in this regard.

    When the Application and Certificate of Live Birth arrives at the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C. the Certificate is bonded, an account is set up with what we know as the Social Security Number, funds are borrowed. The paper credit is invested in stocks and bonds. According to the Bureau of Engraving even Federal Reserve Notes are printed bearing the Bond Number that is assigned to and stamped on the back of each Certificate of Live Birth. The Bond Number consists of a letter (A-N0 followed by eight numbers. A similar combination is now routinely printed on the back of Social Security Cards. The fact is that the very existence of every living, breathing man or woman in the several states is bonded and used for the commercial activities of the United States (Corporate) now in receivership.

    Those who properly file in their birth state or UCC Region establish the distinct and separate identity of the Secured Party apart from the Debtor (Strawman). Presenting that filing along with the Instruction Order (Chargeback), the IRS 1040 ES form, the AFV stamped birth certificate notifies the Secretary of the Treasury that the Secured Party is now established with a prior, superior claim on all assets and liabilities of the Debtor. The liabilities can then be presented to the Secretary for processing and discharge through the UCC Contract Trust.

    An increasing number of states now accept the UCC Financing Statement and Addendum. To my knowledge not one state has prosecuted any such filing as unlawful, illegal or criminal. Many states are still digesting the revised UCC Code (July 1, 2001) and many counties still do not have provision for perfecting the UCC filing under Article 9-333(a) as a Possessory Lien. The inclusion of 9-333(a) is the first time a form of lien by name has been included in the UCC.

    4. Is following the Redemption Process simply an attempt to get something for nothing through the Secretary of the Treasury?

    In June 1933 the International Bankers, owners of the Federal Reserve, essentially took control of all private and real property with the consent of Congress and Executive Orders of the President. Establishing status as the Secured Party for the entity represented by the Certificate of Live Birth does not constitute getting "something for nothing." These procedures set up by the government were put in place so that the Secured Party could reclaim a part of what is rightfully theirs under the U.S. Constitution. Congress made provision beginning in the early 1900s for every minor to reinstate their status as an American under the U.S. Constitution when they became of age. You were a minor when the original contract (Application) was entered into by your parents. These provisions were scattered throughout various legislative acts, joint resolutions and executive orders, many in 1933, as well as in the Congressional Record based on Public Policy HJR-192, codified in Public Law 73-10 and confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1939. See Guarantee Trust of New York v. Henwood, et al (FN3). By these placement actions the Administration and Congress basically kept the details obscured so no one could readily avail himself of such remedy. Very few were even aware such procedures existed until fairly recently. The UCC filing with the birth/UCC Regional, the Secretary of the Treasury and resident state is an essential part of the Redemption Process. The IMF through their representative, the Secretary of the Treasury, with the use of the Federal Reserve and collection activity of the IRS virtually controls all assets of every U.S. Citizen. With the UCC/Redemption the Secured Party establishes the right to begin reversing that absolute control over the Debtor (Strawman). The Secured Party establishes level ground with the Secretary of the Treasury taking back a measure of control of those assets.

    However, UCC filings, properly prepared and correctly filed, go much further in protecting the property and interests of the Secured Party. Such filings can clearly secure legal vested interest control of the Secured Party without the complex jurisdiction of the courts and apart from the arena of controversy.

    5. Is the Redemption Process (Plan) simply a "get rich quick" ruse or trick that will only result in retaliation by the government against those who follow it?

    The Secured Party under the UCC/Redemption Process does not hold the actual Application for a Certificate of Live Birth. Therefore, the process can only be used as an "Accepted For Value" response to a commercial claim. A written, contracted, acknowledged claim received by the Debtor (Strawman) can be Accepted For Value by the Secured Party and discharged when properly presented through the Secretary of the Treasury to the UCC Contract Trust on file with the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS. Unfortunately, many have attempted to circumvent or distort this fact only to find law enforcement and the courts more than willing to enforce and adjudicate. IRS-CID and FBI are often quick to use their intimidation and threat to unlawfully discourage what the courts of law only should handle.

    Employees at the Department of the Treasury make it clear they do not accept or act upon faxed orders, telephoned or wired instructions. Hard copy, original in-signature forms and documents must be presented via Certified (or registered) mail as filed with both the state and the Secretary of the Treasury. In 2002, before his resignation, Mr. Paul H. O'Neill made it clear to a Senator from Arkansas that when he is aware of and receives Bill of Exchange documents, he holds them, thus honoring them.

    The IRS has recently increased its unlawful use of threats and intimidation with the help of the FBI to discourage and stop the presentment of all Bill of Exchange documents by the Secured party to the Secretary. However, properly prepared and presented negotiable instruments from a legitimate Secured Party can be lawfully and legally processed through local financial institutions by the claimant through the Secretary of the Treasury and ledgered by the financial institution through the Treasury Tax and Loan (TTL) account. However, certain employees at the Department of the Treasury persist in misrouting many of the documents presented by a Secured Party to the Secretary of the Treasury by labeling them as Treasury Securities (which they are not) then sending them to the Bureau of Public Debt instead of to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS and the UCC Contract Trust.

    As far as I have been able to determine discharge of claims in the public sector, federal and state, initiated by the IRS are discharged with a simple ledger entry and computer transfer for credit and debit through the IRS Technical Support Division. Further confirmation regarding this process has come from the Special Procedure Handling Offices of the IRS.

    http://www.thesnipestrial.com/buhtz.htm

    My Birth Certificate Is a Bank Note?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  32. Scorpio

    Scorpio Скорпион Founding Member Board Elder Site Mgr Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    22,586
    Likes Received:
    23,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Thank you very much for your contributions GH,

    Invaluable information,

    Scorp


    :wait:
     
  33. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
  34. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Know Who You Are

    http://beam.to/tapes

    Click on "Brief History" link
     
  35. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    A Bug's Life in America

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  36. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Eisenhower warns us of the military industrial complex



    another good one on The Secrets of the CIA

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  37. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Cronkite, Satan, and Hillary Oh My!

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  38. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Brown's Bottom

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  39. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    JFK and the Dollar

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015
  40. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,770
    Likes Received:
    27,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Re: A place to start learning....

    Matrix and the New World Order

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2015

Share This Page