1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

Americans pay a percentage of their taxes to the Queen of England via the IRS

Discussion in 'Topical Discussions (In Depth)' started by Goldhedge, Nov 6, 2015.



  1. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    28,442
    Likes Received:
    32,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    Americans pay a percentage of their taxes to the Queen of England via the IRS. The IRS is not an agency of the Federal Government.

    [​IMG]
    The Queen of Beers

    It is an agency of the International Monetary Fund which is an agency of the United Nations. No law has ever been passed legalizing the charging of income tax. The 1040 tax form is the payment of a foreign tax to the King/Queen of England.

    American citizens have been in financial servitude to the British Monarch since the Treaty of 1783 and the War of Dependence.

    All tax payers have an Individual Master File and are held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K. and payable to the U.K. Prior to 1991, the Business Master File in 6209 was U.S.-U.K.

    Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. That means that everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce.

    [​IMG]

    The 16th Amendment Purporting To Authorize Federal Taxation Of US Individuals Was Never Ratified By The States.

    The first Federal income tax in the United States occurred during the civil war, through the passage of The Revenue Act of 1861: three percent for those making between $600 and $10,000, and five percent for those making over $10,000. This income tax was repealed ten years later.

    The U.S. Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Federal income tax violated the U.S. Constitution because it was a direct tax on individuals and not apportioned between the States, required by the Constitution. The Constitution protects individuals against the abuse of Federal government power by stripping from the FEDs the power to tax individuals, knowing the power to tax is the power to destroy.

    So the Federal power-seekers sought to overrule our forefathers and to empower the Federal Government, (that is, our US Federal Corporation, hereinafter, “The FEDS”) with the power to tax individuals through the 16th Amendment.

    The ratification of the 16th Amendment is dubious. In 1913, the same year British agents steered through Congress the FED fraud on the night before Christmas Eve, the 16th Amendment was hatched. But the founders made changing the Constitution difficult, to say the least. One of two ways to alter our founding document requires any proposed Constitutional Amendment be ratified by three-fourths of the States.

    Fraud and deceit were the hallmarks of this “ratification” process. At the time there were 48 States. More than 13 States either did not ratify the 16th Amendment, or it was fraudulently reported by a State Secretary of State as ratified, when it in fact was not. (The Law That Never Was) Ohio was counted as a ratifying State, even though Ohio did not lawfully become a State until Eisenhower signed an order in the 1950s.

    Much much more: http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/0...ir-taxes-to-the-queen-of-england-via-the-irs/
     
  2. Mujahideen

    Mujahideen Black Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    8,298
    Likes Received:
    12,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Silver stacker
    Location:
    America!
    The irs is under the treasury.
     
  3. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,710
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right


    4. Can IRS legally show “Department of the Treasury” on their outgoing mail?

    Answer: No.
    It is obvious that such deceptive nomenclature is intended to convey the false impression that IRS is a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal laws prohibit the use of United States Mail for fraudulent purposes. Every piece of U.S. Mail sent from IRS with “Department of the Treasury” in the return address, is one count of mail fraud. See also 31 U.S.C. 333.


    http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

    =========================================================

    18 U.S. Code § 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

    US Code
    Notes
    prev | next
    Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.



    ============================================================


    31 U.S. Code § 333 - Prohibition of misuse of Department of the Treasury names, symbols, etc.
    US Code
    Notes
    Authorities (CFR)
    prev | next
    (a) General Rule.— No person may use, in connection with, or as a part of, any advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product, whether alone or with other words, letters, symbols, or emblems—
    (1) the words “Department of the Treasury”, or the name of any service, bureau, office, or other subdivision of the Department of the Treasury,
    (2) the titles “Secretary of the Treasury” or “Treasurer of the United States” or the title of any other officer or employee of the Department of the Treasury,
    (3) the abbreviations or initials of any entity referred to in paragraph (1),
    (4) the words “United States Savings Bond” or the name of any other obligation issued by the Department of the Treasury,
    (5) any symbol or emblem of an entity referred to in paragraph (1) (including the design of any envelope or stationary used by such an entity), and
    (6) any colorable imitation of any such words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, or emblems,
    in a manner which could reasonably be interpreted or construed as conveying the false impression that such advertisement, solicitation, business activity, or product is in any manner approved, endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by, or associated with, the Department of the Treasury or any entity referred to in paragraph (1) or any officer or employee thereof.
    (b) Treatment of Disclaimers.— Any determination of whether a person has violated the provisions of subsection (a) shall be made without regard to any use of a disclaimer of affiliation with the United States Government or any particular agency or instrumentality thereof.
    (c) Civil Penalty.—
    (1) In general.— The Secretary of the Treasury may impose a civil penalty on any person who violates the provisions of subsection (a).
    (2) Amount of penalty.— The amount of the civil penalty imposed by paragraph (1) shall not exceed $5,000 for each use of any material in violation of subsection (a). If such use is in a broadcast or telecast, the preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting “$25,000” for “$5,000”.
    (3) Time limitations.—
    (A) Assessments.— The Secretary of the Treasury may assess any civil penalty under paragraph (1) at any time before the end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of the violation with respect to which such penalty is imposed.
    (B) Civil action.— The Secretary of the Treasury may commence a civil action to recover any penalty imposed under this subsection at any time before the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date on which such penalty was assessed.
    (4) Coordination with subsection (d).—No penalty may be assessed under this subsection with respect to any violation after a criminal proceeding with respect to such violation has been commenced under subsection (d).
    (d) Criminal Penalty.—
    (1) In general.— If any person knowingly violates subsection (a), such person shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $10,000 for each such use or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. If such use is in a broadcast or telecast, the preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting “$50,000” for “$10,000”.
    (2) Time limitations.— No person may be prosecuted, tried, or punished under paragraph (1) for any violation of subsection (a) unless the indictment is found or the information instituted during the 3-year period beginning on the date of the violation.
    (3) Coordination with subsection (c).—No criminal proceeding may be commenced under this subsection with respect to any violation if a civil penalty has previously been assessed under subsection (c) with respect to such violation.
     
  4. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    10,374
    Likes Received:
    15,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    Read "The Law That Never Was" by Bill Benson & Red Beckman.
    They went to EVERY state in the union, to view the archives.
    Only a very few states ratified the 16th Amend.
    IMG.jpg
     
    Aurumag likes this.
  5. Silvertoothtiger

    Silvertoothtiger Seeker Seeker

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The queen has had her day
     
  6. Ragnarok

    Ragnarok I'd rather be Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,488
    Likes Received:
    4,331
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Given all the above, who can really do anything about it? Who can afford to fight it, much less try to learn all the legalese to do so and possibly win? What poitician can take any lawful action against the IRS/FED without being assassinated? Is jury nullification the only way to battle this?

    R.
     
    TAEZZAR likes this.
  7. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    10,374
    Likes Received:
    15,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    I think it's a damned good start.
     
  8. StrawMan=Corporation

    StrawMan=Corporation Seeker Seeker

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    No need to fight it.

    Just stop the insanity and don't contract with fed government anymore.

    The next time the entity you work for wants a fresh signature on a new w4 tell them sorry I don't wish to contract with fed government any longer.

    That or write "Non Assumsit" above any signature you may be forced to leave upon a w4 form.

    And stop the cycle stop getting your kids a SSN and Birth Certificate as neither is required to apply for or hold. They are only a benifit to the money changers and maybe get a parent a kickback from IRS but is the pittance of $ worth putting your kid in bond age for the rest of his or her natural life ?

    There is a whole series on this at suijuris.
     
  9. Krag

    Krag Planet earth Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,014
    Likes Received:
    2,769
    Trophy Points:
    113

Share This Page