1. Have a great weekend!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Gold and Silver finish the week down
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 4/29/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1268.30-- DOWN 20.80 Silver $17.19-- down 61 Oil $49.33-- down 0.29 USD $98.89 -- down 0.99

Breivik Manifesto 2083

Discussion in 'Politics Forum (Local/National/World)' started by searcher, Mar 5, 2017.



  1. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    107,614
    Likes Received:
    34,692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How it all began - Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism

    Most Europeans look back on the 1950s as a good time. Our homes were safe, to the point where many people did not bother to lock their doors. Public schools were generally excellent, and their problems were things like talking in class and running in the halls. Most men treated women like ladies, and most ladies devoted their time and effort to making good homes, rearing their children well and helping their communities through volunteer work. Children grew up in two–parent households, and the mother was there to meet the child when he came home from school. Entertainment was something the whole family could enjoy.

    What happened?

    If a man of the 1950s were suddenly introduced into Western Europe in the 2000s, he would hardly recognise it as the same country. He would be in immediate danger of getting mugged, carjacked or worse, because he would not have learned to live in constant fear. He would not know that he shouldn't go into certain parts of the city, that his car must not only be locked but equipped with an alarm, that he dare not go to sleep at night without locking the windows and bolting the doors - and setting the electronic security system.

    If he brought his family with him, he and his wife would probably cheerfully pack their children off to the nearest public school. When the children came home in the afternoon and told them they had to go through a metal detector to get in the building, had been given some funny white powder by another kid and learned that homosexuality is normal and good, the parents would be uncomprehending.

    In the office, the man might light up a cigarette, drop a reference to the "little lady", and say he was happy to see the firm employing some coloured folks in important positions. Any of those acts would earn a swift reprimand, and together they might get him fired.

    When she went into the city to shop, the wife would put on a nice suit, hat, and possibly gloves. She would not understand why people stared, and mocked.

    And when the whole family sat down after dinner and turned on the television, they would not understand how pornography from some sleazy, blank-fronted "Adults Only" kiosk had gotten on their set.

    Were they able, our 1950s family would head back to the 1950s as fast as they could, with a gripping horror story to tell. Their story would be of a nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less than a half a century from the greatest countries on earth to Third World nations, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt. The fall of Rome was graceful by comparison.

    Why did it happen?

    Over the last fifty years, Western Europe has been conquered by the same force that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany and Italy. That force is ideology. Here, as elsewhere, ideology has inflicted enormous damage on the traditional culture it came to dominate, fracturing it everywhere and sweeping much of it away. In its place came fear, and ruin. Russia will take a generation or more to recover from Communism, if it ever can.

    The ideology that has taken over Western Europe goes most commonly by the name of "Political Correctness". Some people see it as a joke. It is not. It is deadly serious. It seeks to alter virtually all the rules, formal and informal, that govern relations among people and institutions. It wants to change behaviour, thought, even the words we use. To a significant extent, it already has. Whoever or whatever controls language also controls thought. Who dares to speak of "ladies" now?

    Just what is "Political Correctness?" Political Correctness is in fact cultural Marxism (Cultural Communism) - Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, "Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?" The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in European and American universities after many of its leading lights fled and spread all over Europe and even to the United States in the 1930s to escape National Socialism in Germany. In Western Europe it gained influence in universities from 1945.

    The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create "Critical Theory" and "deconstruction". These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call "Political Correctness". The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to Karl Marx.

    The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a "classless society", i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human nature - because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point - society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness can be seen on campuses where "PC" has taken over the college: freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought are all eliminated.

    The second major parallel is that both classical, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism have single-factor explanations of history. Classical Marxism argues that all of history was determined by ownership of the means of production. Cultural Marxism says that history is wholly explained by which groups - defined by sex, race, religion and sexual normality or abnormality - have power over which other groups.

    The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behaviour of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines all minorities, what they see as the victims: Muslims, Feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and they view ethnic Christian European men as evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognise the existence of non-Feminist women, and defines Muslims, Asians and Africans who reject Political Correctness as evil, just like native Christian or even atheist Europeans.).

    The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists, where they obtained power, expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed it to the state, as the "representative" of the workers and the peasants. Cultural Marxists, when they gain power (including through our own government), lay penalties on native European men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the "victim" groups they favour. Affirmative action is an example.

    Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical Marxists, the analysis is economic. For cultural Marxists, the analysis is linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction "proves" that any "text", past or present, illustrates the oppression of Muslims, women, homosexuals, etc. by reading that meaning into words of the text (regardless of their actual meaning). Both methods are, of course, phony analyses that twist the evidence to fit preordained conclusions, but they lend a 'scientific" air to the ideology.

    These parallels are neither remarkable nor coincidental. They exist because Political Correctness is directly derived from classical Marxism, and is in fact a variant of Marxism. Through most of the history of Marxism, cultural Marxists were "read out" of the movement by classical, economic Marxists. Today, with economic Marxism dead, cultural Marxism has filled its shoes. The medium has changed, but the message is the same: a society of radical egalitarianism enforced by the power of the state.

    Political Correctness now looms over Western European society like a colossus. It has taken over both political wings, left and right. Among so-called Western European "conservative" parties the actual cultural conservatives are shown the door because being a cultural conservative opposes the very essence of political correctness. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the media and entertainment industry. It dominates both public and higher education: many a college campus is a small, ivy-covered North Korea. It has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the Establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the Establishment.

    The most vital question is: how can Western Europeans combat Political Correctness and retake their society from the cultural Marxists?

    It is not sufficient just to criticise Political Correctness. It tolerates a certain amount of criticism, even gentle mocking. It does so through no genuine tolerance for other points of view, but in order to disarm its opponents, to let itself seem less menacing than it is. The cultural Marxists do not yet have total power, and they are too wise to appear totalitarian until their victory is assured.

    Rather, those who would defeat cultural Marxism must defy it. They must use words it forbids, and refuse to use the words it mandates; remember, sex is better than gender. They must shout from the rooftops the realities it seeks to suppress, such as our opposition to Sharia on a national and local level, the Islamisation of our countries, the facts that violent crime is disproportionately committed by Muslims and that most cases of AIDS are voluntary, i.e., acquired from immoral sexual acts. They must refuse to turn their children over to public schools.

    Above all, those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according to the old rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay down. Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of wedlock. Glorification of homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not accept Islam as an excuse for murder.

    Defiance spreads. When other Western Europeans see one person defy Political Correctness and survive - and you still can, for now - they are emboldened. They are tempted to defy it, too, and some do. The ripples from a single act of defiance, of one instance of walking up to the clay idol and breaking off its nose, can range far. There is nothing the Politically Correct fear more than open defiance, and for good reason; it is their chief vulnerability. That should lead cultural conservatives to defy cultural Marxism at every turn.

    While the hour is late, the battle is not decided. Very few Western Europeans realise that Political Correctness is in fact Marxism in a different set of clothes. As that realisation spreads, defiance will spread with it. At present, Political Correctness prospers by disguising itself. Through defiance, and through education on our own part (which should be part of every act of defiance), we can strip away its camouflage and reveal the Marxism beneath the window-dressing of "sensitivity", "tolerance", and "multiculturalism".

    Who dares, wins.



    The Historical Roots of "Political Correctness"
    Western Europe is dominated by an alien system of beliefs today, attitudes and values that we have come to know as "Political Correctness". Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.

    Social revolution has a long history, conceivably going as far back as Plato's Republic. But it was the French Revolution of 1789 that inspired Karl Marx to develop his theories in the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, the success of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in Russia set off a wave of optimistic expectation among the Marxist forces in Europe and America that the new proletarian world of equality was finally coming into being. Russia, as the first communist nation in the world, would lead the revolutionary forces to victory.

    The Marxist revolutionary forces in Europe leaped at this opportunity. Following the end of World War I, there was a Communist "Spartacist" uprising in Berlin, Germany led by Rosa Luxemburg; the creation of a "Soviet" in Bavaria led by Kurt Eisner; and a Hungarian communist republic established by Bela Kun in 1919. At the time, there was great concern that all of Europe might fall under the banner of Bolshevism. This sense of impending doom was given vivid life by Trotsky's Red Army invasion of Poland in 1919.

    However, the Red Army was defeated by Polish forces at the battle of the Vistula in 1920. The Spartacist, Bavarian Soviet and Bela Kun governments all failed to gain widespread support from the workers and after a brief time they were all overthrown. These events created a quandary for the Marxist revolutionaries in Europe. Under Marxist economic theory, the oppressed workers were supposed to be the beneficiaries of a social revolution that would place them on top of the power structure. When these revolutionary opportunities presented themselves, however, the workers did not respond. The Marxist revolutionaries did not blame their theory for these failures. They blamed the workers.

    One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society's cultural "superstructure" rather than on the economic substructures, as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.

    Antonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini's jails where he wrote his famous Prison Notebooks. Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new "Communist man" had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society's institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.

    Georg Lukacs was the son a wealthy Hungarian banker. Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist culture to emerge, the existing culture had to be destroyed. He said, "I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch", and, "Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries".

    When he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary in 1919, Lukacs launched what became known as "Cultural Terrorism". As part of this terrorism he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs' campaign of "Cultural Terrorism" was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later bring to Western European schools.

    In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. In 1933, when Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled. Most came to the United States.

    The members of the Frankfurt School conducted numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they believed lay behind the rise of National Socialism in Germany. The Frankfurt School's studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism. These criticisms, known collectively as Critical Theory, were reflected in such works of the Frankfurt School as Erich Fromm's Escape from Freedom and The Dogma of Christ, Wilhelm Reich's The Mass Psychology of Fascism and Theodor Adorno's The Authoritarian Personality.

    The Authoritarian Personality, published in 1950, substantially influenced Western European psychologists and social scientists. The book was premised on one basic idea, that the presence in a society of Christianity, capitalism, and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial and religious prejudice and German fascism. The Authoritarian Personality became a handbook for a national campaign against any kind of prejudice or discrimination on the theory that if these evils were not eradicated, another Holocaust might occur on the European continent. This campaign, in turn, provided a basis for Political Correctness.

    Critical Theory incorporated sub-theories which were intended to chip away at specific elements of the existing culture, including "matriarchal theory", "androgyny theory", "personality theory", "authority theory", "family theory", "sexuality theory", "racial theory", "legal theory", and "literary theory". Put into practice, these theories were to be used to overthrow the prevailing social order and usher in social revolution.

    To achieve this, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School recognised that traditional beliefs and the existing social structure would have to be destroyed and then replaced. The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy, the belief that men and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with androgyny, and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the belief that homosexuality is equally "normal".

    As a grand scheme intended to deny the intrinsic worth of native Christian European heterosexual males, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. Many believed that oppressed Muslims, non-European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the vanguard of a communist revolution in Europe.

    Trotsky's ideas were adopted by many of the student leaders of the 1960s counterculture movement, who attempted to elevate minority revolutionaries to positions of leadership in their movement.

    The student revolutionaries were also strongly influenced by the ideas of Herbert Marcuse, another member of the Frankfurt School. Marcuse preached the "Great Refusal", a rejection of all basic Western concepts, sexual liberation and the merits of feminist and black revolution. His primary thesis was that university students, ghetto blacks, the alienated, the asocial, and the Third World could take the place of the proletariat in the Communist revolution. In his book "An Essay on Liberation", Marcuse proclaimed his goals of a radical transvaluation of values; the relaxation of taboos; cultural subversion; Critical Theory; and a linguistic rebellion that would amount to a methodical reversal of meaning. As for racial conflict, Marcuse wrote that white men are guilty and that blacks are the most natural force of rebellion.

    Marcuse may be the most important member of the Frankfurt School in terms of the origins of Political Correctness, because he was the critical link to the counterculture of the 1960s. His objective was clear: "One can rightfully speak of a cultural revolution, since the protest is directed toward the whole cultural establishment, including morality of existing society..." His means was liberating the powerful, primeval force of sex from its civilised restraints, a message preached in his book, Eros and Civilisation, published in 1955. Marcuse became one of the main gurus of the 1960s adolescent sexual rebellion; he himself coined the expression "make love, not war". With that role, the chain of Marxist influence via the Frankfurt School was completed: from Lukacs' service as Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Hungarian government in 1919 to Western European and American students burning the flag and taking over college administration buildings in the 1960s. Today, many of these same colleges are bastions of Political Correctness, and the former student radicals have become the faculties.

    One of the most important contributors to Political Correctness was Betty Friedan. Through her book The Feminine Mystique, Friedan tied Feminism to Abraham Maslow's theory of self-actualisation. Maslow was a social psychologist who in his early years did research on female dominance and sexuality. Maslow was a friend of Herbert Marcuse at Brandeis University and had met Erich Fromm in 1936. He was strongly impressed by Fromm's Frankfurt School ideology. He wrote an article, "The Authoritarian Character Structure", published in 1944, that reflected the personality theory of Critical Theory. Maslow was also impressed with the work of Wilhelm Reich, who was another Frankfurt School originator of personality theory.

    The significance of the historical roots of Political Correctness cannot be fully appreciated unless Betty Friedan's revolution in sex roles is viewed for what it really was - a manifestation of the social revolutionary process begun by Karl Marx. Friedan's reliance on Abraham Maslow's reflection of Frankfurt School ideology is only one indicator. Other indicators include the correspondence of Friedan's revolution in sex roles with Georg Lukacs' annihilation of old values and the creation of new ones, and with Herbert Marcuse's transvaluation of values. But the idea of transforming a patriarchy into a matriarchy - which is what a sex-role inversion is designed to do - can be connected directly to Friedrich Engels book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. First published in 1884, this book popularised the now-accepted feminist belief that deep-rooted discrimination against the oppressed female sex was a function of patriarchy. The belief that matriarchy was the solution to patriarchy flows from Marx's comments in The German Ideology, published in 1845. In this work Marx advanced the idea that wives and children were the first property of the patriarchal male. The Frankfurt School's matriarchal theory and its near-relation, androgyny theory, both originated from these sources.

    When addressing the general public, advocates of Political Correctness - or cultural Marxism, to give it its true name - present their beliefs attractively. It's all just a matter of being "sensitive" to other people, they say. They use words such as "tolerance" and "diversity", asking, "Why can't we all just get along?"

    The reality is different. Political Correctness is not at all about "being nice", unless one thinks gulags are nice places. Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order, and, ultimately, a totalitarian state. If anything, the cultural Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than the old, economic Marxism that ruined Russia. At least the economic Marxists did not exalt sexual perversion and attempt to create a matriarchy, as the Frankfurt School and its descendants have done.

    This short essay has sought to show one critical linkage, that between classical Marxism and the ingredients of the "cultural revolution" that broke out in Western Europe in the 1960s. Of course, the action does not stop in the '60s; the workings of the Frankfurt School are yet very much with us, especially in the field of education. That topic, and other present-day effects of Frankfurt School thinking, will be further analysed.

    https://sites.google.com/site/breivikmanifesto/2083/introduction/05
     
    TAEZZAR, BarnacleBob and Eyebone like this.
  2. Eyebone

    Eyebone Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,167
    Likes Received:
    1,980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Seattle
    This nails a lot of things.
     
    TAEZZAR and BarnacleBob like this.
  3. Fanakapan

    Fanakapan Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,408
    Likes Received:
    2,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Limeyland
    Breivik ? Thats the guy who shot 69 folk dead, and another 8 killed by a bomb he planted ?

    So basically, the ideas contained may have some good points, but much like the Unabombers Manifesto, the means of promotion means that they are out of play.

    I notice from the site that the name of the guy publishing this stuff is Andrew Berwick, using the name of a mass murderer really puts this material on the same level as the thoughts of Charlie Manson :)

    EDIT: From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik it becomes clear that the material is the manifesto of Anders Breivik. So basically the outpourings of a Whacko.
     
  4. latemetal

    latemetal Gold Chaser Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,954
    Likes Received:
    1,842
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And yet, he is right...which is why he has been extremely isolated, but is this the same guy?
     
    TAEZZAR and searcher like this.
  5. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    107,614
    Likes Received:
    34,692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Same guy but no where near the entire manifesto. Just stuff I thought was worth reading.
     
    TAEZZAR and Fanakapan like this.
  6. Fanakapan

    Fanakapan Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,408
    Likes Received:
    2,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Limeyland
    It seems he creatively recycled the Unabombers Manifesto, and threw in some Islamophobic stuff which is fairly common currency these days.

    Ted Kaczynski's original was thought provoking, but with the guy being a whacko it didn't matter how valid his ideas may have been. And the overruling theme was borne of the 'I didn't make it because of' mindset. A state of mind thats not that uncommon amongst humanity at large :)
     
    TAEZZAR and searcher like this.
  7. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    9,551
    Likes Received:
    14,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    I think, what I put in quotes here, are VERY GOOD !!!
    I have lived my life in DEFIANCE of the pc Bullshit & proud of it !!!

     
    searcher likes this.
  8. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    107,614
    Likes Received:
    34,692
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I received a link to the entire manifesto from a fellow who feels the same as I do about muslims. He suggested I read what I posted in the OP. Rather than play around with the manifesto (way too long to play with) I googled the good stuff (lol) read it and thought it was worth sharing.

    I do not believe that muslims belong in the west. Their way of life, religious and personal beliefs are incompatible with the western world. And they sure as shit don't want to become like us. They want us to become like them. That's pure horse shit. What is in the OP isn't islamophobic stuff................it's the truth. And I thought some members might appreciate it. As to what happens in Europe with the rag heads................I hope it stays in Europe. No dog in that fight. One thing that I'm really curious about............Why did your leaders want to bring them into your lands? Never made any sense to me until I read the OP. Can you dig it?

    As for America - the muzzie lover Obama is gone. With any luck Trump may be able to rid the U.S. of that ilk.

    As to what I personally feel about Breivik and Kaczynski - They are both human scum who should have been publically executed.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2017
    Fanakapan and TAEZZAR like this.
  9. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    9,551
    Likes Received:
    14,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    searcher, that is WELL SAID !!!

    They want us to become like them.
    Is this not, an invasion, war, the very definition of GENOCIDE ?
    And we are expected to accept it ?
     
    searcher likes this.
  10. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    107,614
    Likes Received:
    34,692
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Thanks.......................:beer:
     
    TAEZZAR likes this.
  11. Garyw

    Garyw Silver Member Silver Miner

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    tired and retired
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    What ever happened to the Weekly Reader.
    I think we need to keep and follow the constitution, Unincorporate the United states and start over. I want our land back in the west. Bring back wood shop, metal shop and vocational agriculture back to our schools. Just have trade schools instead of socialist colleges. Protect our borders and keep our troops home. Am I asking for too much?
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2017
    searcher and TAEZZAR like this.
  12. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    9,551
    Likes Received:
    14,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    In a word - NO !!!

    hahahah, the Weekly Reader, I had completely forgotten about that. Thanks for the reminder.
     
    Garyw and searcher like this.
  13. Fanakapan

    Fanakapan Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,408
    Likes Received:
    2,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Limeyland
    On the Muslim slant,

    I'm of the opinion that its not so much the religion as it is the Cultural traits of those from what are fundamentally backward societies that are the problem ?

    Islam where it exists, and has taken root in the west, say in Bosnia, is no more noxious than any other religion. Its the people who are different in their outlook ? They accept the principle of freedom of worship.

    Thats the key, religious freedom ? And any folk who cant get to grips with it should be shipped back to whatever intellectually retarded toilet they hail from :)
     
    searcher likes this.

Share This Page