1. All on hold waiting for a tax plan announcement
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Good Weds Am. Gold is down 1 to 1266, while Silver is down 2 to 1757 after a late collapse yesterday. Crude is down 15 to 4941. The USD is up 31 to 9896.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 4/22/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1289.10-- UP 0.60 Silver $17.85-- down 66 Oil $49.62-- down 3.80 USD $99.88 -- down 58

County and Municpal Ordinances ARE NOT Binding Public Law

Discussion in 'Beginner's Forum' started by Goldhedge, Jun 16, 2015.



  1. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    26,150
    Likes Received:
    28,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    FWIW DYODD


    No Matter WHAT the Courts Tell You, County and Municpal Ordinances ARE NOT Binding Public Law!!
    JUNE 16, 2015 TAOOFLAW

    I am giving away these two chapters of my second book simply because the information in the second attached chapter relating to ordinances is so wide-spread and pervasive in every single Union State.

    Please read them carefully and compare what is written to your own sovereign state’s constitution and see if you notice the same irregularities in what your pretend representatives have been doing to you for the last several decades of deceit and betrayal in which they have all engaged at some point or other.

    It works very much like the “good cop” problem, there are no “good cops” because they won’t arrest and charge the bad ones out of self-preservation for their own careers. And no less is true of the politicians you have allowed to occupy your public offices. Even when things are done that violate law, ethics, morality, and the constitutional prohibitions making it unlawful, they do nothing to expose and call out their corrupt fellows to be held publicly accountable.

    Screw the ‘thin blue line,’ the ‘code of silence,’ and the ‘chain of command’ if any or all of them require or allow corruption and abuse of power and authority to win the day over right and justice. Don’t any of you dare stand there and call your actions or inactions ‘good’ when you see evil things being perpetrated and do nothing to stop, prevent, or publicly expose it just so you don’t risk losing a paycheck. Nothing is more pathetic and hypocritical than that.

    What I have written about here is everything that we are all having to experience and survive in our modern police state and over-regulated society and way of living, and it needs to stop. But only by knowing and educating others can we hope to do that. So please, take the time to read what is contained in the attached document, especially if you are an attorney or personally know one that would appreciate the information (good luck on that one….).

    General-Notes-on-Ordinances-Are-Not-Law

    https://taooflaw.wordpress.com/2015...nicpal-ordinances-are-not-binding-public-law/
     
    BarnacleBob, freud198 and Eyebone like this.
  2. StrawMan=Corporation

    StrawMan=Corporation Seeker Seeker

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    217
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Your post made me think of this.
    [​IMG]

    https://forestqueen2020.wordpress.c...t-of-city-county-codes-ordinances-prohibited/


    ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED

    Here are several items that refer to the concept and the cases I've
    heard of relating to it.

    NOTICE ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED
    California law prohibits cities and counties from enforcing city or
    county codes and ordinances upon property that is not OWNED by the
    city or county -- even if the property is within city limits.
    >
    CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE
    CHAPTER 5B
    CITATIONS FOR VIOLATIONS
    OF COUNTY, CITY OR CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCES
    SECTIONS 853.1 THROUGH 853.4
    (REPEALED IN 1967)

    The Supreme Court ruled that municipalities cannot exert any acts
    of ownership and control over property that is not OWNED by them,
    see Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 US 606, 150 L.Ed. 2d 592, 121
    S.Ct.___(2001) (no expiration date on the takings clause for city's
    illegal enforcement of its codes on the man's private property and
    restricting the man's business), affirming both Lucas v. South
    Carolina Coastal Council, .505, US 1003, 120 L.Ed. 2d 798 (1992)
    (butterfly activists and code -enforcement cannot restrict
    development of the man's private swampland unless they lawfully
    acquire the land FIRST, surveying with binoculars constitutes a
    "takings"), and Monterey v. De1 Monte Dunes, 526 US 687 (1999), 143
    L..Ed. 2d 882, 119 S.Ct.____(1998).

    NOTE THE DATE SOF THE FOREGOING CASES

    In the Monterey case, the Californian private property owner was
    awarded $8 million for code enforcement's illegal trespass and
    restriction of his business, and another $1.45 million for the
    aggravation of a forced sale.
     
    fracturedfarms and Goldhedge like this.
  3. ttazzman

    ttazzman Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    4,263
    Likes Received:
    2,988
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    commercial/ industrial-construction/engineering/ma
    Location:
    mid-usa
    law is all about enforcement......i enforced laws around my home for my children that were probably UN-constitutional when they were young.......IE they did not have the right of free speech...
     

Share This Page