1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

MENTALLY ILL AMERICA: The 10 delusional demands of political correctness

Discussion in 'Politics Forum (Local/National/World)' started by Bigjon, Jul 12, 2016.



  1. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    MENTALLY ILL AMERICA: The 10 delusional demands of political correctness you are required to accept, despite the contradictory evidence witnessed with your own eyes
    [​IMG]
    Monday, July 11, 2016
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Tags: political correctness, mass mental illness, insane America

    Facebook (2,981)
    Twitter
    [​IMG]

    (NaturalNews) Political correctness, at its core, is an insidious demand that you dismiss the evidence you witness with your own eyes, replacing it with delusional, false narratives that have been shoved into your head by the conforming, obedient masses.

    Political correctness means that if you are looking at red barn and 100 of your peers ridicule you while saying it's a BLUE barn, you must nod your head in agreement and surrender, "Yes, it's blue." Even when it's actually red. Political correctness is, essentially,a war on logic and reason. 2+2=5, Winston!

    Political correctness is rooted in the demented notion that social memes now overrule physical and biological reality, requiring you to reject things that are real and replace them with beliefs that are fabricated out of thin air for political purposes. That this process now dominates modern society is proof that our world is run by the mentally ill... and that hoards of mentally ill obedient sheeple are more than happy to go along with the shared delusions that stem from such mental illness.

    Truthfully, we are all now living in a time of mass mental illness, where 99 out of 100 people believe insane, untrue and impossible things that have been demanded of them by the ruling political puppet masters. In this article, I outline just 10 of the most dangerous delusions we are all now demanded to follow.

    If you believe any of these things, you are clinically insane and probably need to have your head examined.

    The ten delusional demands of political correctness
    Demand #1) It is demanded that you agree Caitlyn Jenner is a woman, even though Caitlyn (Bruce) was born a man, has the biology of a man and has the DNA of a man. The only way anyone can say Caitlyn Jenner is a woman is if they are pressured to abandon common sense and surrender to the mass delusions of a society gone mad. "Yes, that barn is BLUE, by golly!"

    For the record, let me state this as clearly as possible: Caitlyn Jenner is not a woman.He's a dude pretending to be a woman. The fact that Bruce Jenner won a "Woman of the Year" award is the height of stupidity and mass insanity in a culture gone off the deep end. (What, they couldn't find an ACTUAL woman deserving of the award? Seriously? There are no women in America who are a better than Bruce Jenner impersonating a woman? Gimmie a break...)

    Demand #2) It is demanded that you support the illusion that gun laws will halt criminals from using guns to commit violence. The entire delusion hinges on the obviously false idea that people who routinely break the law will somehow magically abide by the law when you want them to. The existence of "gun free zone" signs further demonstrates the delusional thinking of those who ridiculously convince themselves that laws somehow restrict the actions of people who do not follow the law. (Liberalism is the art of being able to hold two wholly contradictory ideas in your head at the same time and somehow believe them both to be true...)

    Demand #3) It is demanded that you agree the economy is in fantastic shape and that unemployment is barely six percent, even though you and everyone you know has trouble finding a job or keeping a decent job these days. While your own standard of living keeps eroding year after year, you are told that "everything is awesome!" by a delusional regime of money masters who are systematically stealing your income and wealth by printing their own money by the trillions.

    Part of the P.C. employment delusion also demands that you reject the obvious truth that Obamacare's employer mandates have caused a wave of job destruction across America as employers shed full-time employees to avoid the crushing costs of a mandatory "sick care" system that's broken and fraudulent (and therefore unaffordable). Flatly stated, to be 100% politically correct on the issues of money and finance, you must believe that money materializes out of a parallel dimension and that real wealth can be created from nothing. (This is a key economic principle of "progressive economics" which always leads to Venezuela-style economic collapse, FYI.)

    Demand #4) It is demanded that you operate under the illusion that only "progressives" have compassion for women and children while, at the same time, supporting the partial birth abortion organ harvesting of living children at abortion centers across the country. This act of harvesting organs from babies, of course, requires killing the babies in the process. You are demanded to affirm that no such thing ever takes place and to believe that all babies are "dead" until the moment they are fully born at which point they are suddenly "alive." Such a belief defies biological reality, logic and reason, yet it is a key platform of progressivism and P.C. delusion.

    Seriously: Progressives believe that when just the head portion of a baby emerges from the birth canal, that baby isn't yet "alive" and therefore the head can be "harvested" for "scientific research" without violating any ethics or morals whatsoever. It is notable that when ISIS terrorists cut off the heads of people, it's called "terror." When abortionists cut off the heads of living babies, it's called "scientific research." This practice is wholly supported, funded and even encouraged by progressives who somehow tell themselves that the murder of fully developed, living babies is a "women's health" right. Huh?

    Demand #5) It is demanded that you affirm Black Lives Matter is a "peaceful" movement even though a huge number of its activists routinely engage in mass violence, hate-filled rhetoric targeting whites and police officers, large-scale societal disruptions and now even give rise to murder against innocent people (such as Dallas police officers). If the exact same actions were being carried out by a group of white people, that group would have been labeled a "terrorist organization" or "hate group" by the entire media long ago.

    Ridiculously, when the group is centered around black people, however, acts of arson, violence and mayhem are down-translated into "civil rights" or even "First Amendment rights." Hmmm... doesn't anybody recognize the bigotry that's inherently rooted in a separatist "black" movement which espouses hate speech and violence against white people based solely on their skin color? BLM's entire platform fits the classic definition of racism and bigotry. They are the KKK of modern, racist America that targets and vilifies whites as a deliberate strategy to assert power. BLM is, by its very definition, inherently racist and bigoted, focusing on separating the races instead of bringing people together under the umbrella of multicultural unity. (Proof of this is the fact that anyone who dares say "ALL lives matter" is immediately branded a racist bigot. Huh?)

    Right now a WhiteHouse.gov petition is circulating to name BLM as a terrorist organization. The petition states:

    Terrorism is defined as “the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims”. This definition is the same definition used to declare ISIS and other groups, as terrorist organizations. Black Lives Matter has earned this title due to its actions in Ferguson, Baltimore, and even at a Bernie Sanders rally, as well as all over the United States and Canada. It is time for the pentagon to be consistent in its actions – and just as they rightfully declared ISIS a terror group, they must declare Black Lives Matter a terror group – on the grounds of principle, integrity, morality, and safety.

    Click here to sign the petition (which the White House will promptly ignore, of course, because Obama is the terrorist sympathizer-in-chief.

    Demand #6) It is demanded that you agree police are never justified in shooting any black person at all, even if that black person was in the act of committing a violent crime or waving guns at police. Any time a police officer wins a fight with a black person, you must call it "police brutality." The only non-racist police officers are those who allow themselves to be shot by black criminals, thereby proving there were never racist in the first place.

    It's kind of like the old witch hunt test, where you throw a suspected witch in the river and see if she floats. Since everybody believed that only witches could float, if the person floated, you burn them to death as a witch. If they sink to their death, then that proves they were innocent. Today, the war on police is nothing more than a racist witch hunt translated into the mentally ill language of "social justice."

    The politically incorrect truth that needs to be stated is that black people are arrested more often by cops for the simple reason that black people are committing more violent crimes, explain black police officers in their own words. Check out the Facebook post of African-American police officer Jay Stalien:

    Black Lives do not matter to most black people. Only the lives that make the national news matter to them. Only the lives that are taken at the hands of cops or white people, matter. The other thousands of lives lost, the other black souls that I along with every cop, have seen taken at the hands of other blacks, do not matter. Their deaths are unnoticed, accepted as the “norm”, and swept underneath the rug by the very people who claim and post “black lives matter”.

    Complaint: Police always targeting us, they always messing with the black man.

    Fact: A city where the majority of citizens are black (Baltimore for example) …will ALWAYS have a higher rate of black people getting arrested, it will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks getting stopped, and will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks getting killed, and the reason why is because a city with those characteristics will ALWAYS have a higher rate of blacks committing crime. The statistics will follow the same trend for Asians if you go to China, for Hispanics if you go to Puerto Rico, for whites if you go to Russia, and the list goes on. It’s called Demographics.


    Demand #7) It is demanded that you embrace all illegal immigration as "compassionate" while strongly opposing national border security. You must welcome all illegals and grant them legal immunity in your sanctuary cities, even as illegals commit mass murder, rapes, robberies and lootings. You must dismiss the truth that illegal, uninsured drivers cause hundreds of accidents every single day across California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas, injuring honest citizens and destroying their vehicles in the process.

    Demand #8) It is demanded that you reject all voter I.D. laws as "racist" on the absurd basis that making sure people can only vote once in each election is somehow inherently bigoted or unfair -- even when it is technically a bedrock of democracy. While nearly every other country in the world requires voter identification at voting centers, you must agree with the P.C. puppet masters that such fundamental rules for democratic fairness are somehow "rooted in racism" and bigotry. (Let's face it: Preventing voter I.D. laws is actually all about making sure as many illegal aliens can vote as possible...)

    Demand #9) It is demanded that you disregard the fact that Islamic terrorists who carry out mass murder on U.S. soil deliberately praise Allah (while the White House tries to censor the 911 phone calls to make sure you never hear those words). You must consider such acts to be "domestic terrorism," not acts of terror inspired by a radicalized religion that preaches hatred for gays and women.

    Somehow, to fit into the P.C. culture in America today, you have to simultaneously worship gay people as well as the Islamic terrorists who murder gay people. How does that compute, exactly?

    Demand #10) It is demanded that you believe all of society's problems would be solved if only government were bigger and individual liberties were replaced with government mandates. The P.C. nanny state requires you to believe, for example, that parents should not have any real parental rights. All children are owned by the State, we're told, and the State may decide to compel those children to be injected with mercury (flu shots) or killed with chemotherapy (cancer treatments) against the parents' will.

    If you listen to the P.C. progressives, all their "solutions" sooner or later rest on their belief that people have too much freedom in America, and that taking away those freedoms is the best way to make society better. Right now, government is about one-third of the U.S. economy. This is apparently too small for the P.C. progressives who ultimately want 100% of the economy to be run by a centralized, incompetent, corrupt government. (The name for that, by the way, is Communism.) Free markets are based. Individual liberty is bad. Self-defense is bad. And of supreme importance is the idea that anyone who opposes totalitarian control by the government is obviously an anti-government whacko who needs to be silenced or marginalized.

    Only government creates jobs, we're told. Only government generates wealth. Only government can uplift the lives of the very people that now suffer under horrifically bad government policies. "You didn't build that!" quips Obama, reminding us all that political correctness is deeply rooted in mass mental illness because none of these beliefs have a shred of truth to them. (Government cannot create actual wealth; it can only confiscate it, redistribute it or destroy it. Usually it excels at all three...)

    Solutions for living as a rational person in a mentally ill society
    If you're a rational, thinking person, then you already know you're living in a society largely populated by mentally ill people who believe one or more of the popular delusions described here. So what's the solution to all this?

    Believe your own experience and refuse to give in to the delusional memes of the P.C. zombies. Remind yourself to stay rooted in reality. Do not be swayed against your own direct experience by the wishy washy narratives of the mentally ill. Spend more time in nature, where truth is evident with every foot step. The more contact you have with nature, the saner you will stay even as the world goes totally insane all around you.

    In essence, all of us must now practice mental self-defense. We must defend our own minds from the twisted distortions, influence and psychological pollution of the P.C. zombies. This requires real dedication to clear thinking and the turning off of all mainstream media sources (which specialize in persuasively presenting false narratives as facts).

    The more you read independent media, in other words, the saner you become as you cast off the false narratives and delusional lies of the P.C. culture. Rejecting political correctness is, in fact, an important first step in the art of mental self-defense. You must also reject the peer pressure from your lunatic friends and family members who often believe all ten of these P.C. falsehoods. Don't try arguing with them, however: They're probably too far gone to save with reason. It's best to move on and make new friends who are already awakened and aware of what's really going on.

    http://www.naturalnews.com/054625_political_correctness_mass_mental_illness_insane_America.html
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 12, 2016
  2. Buck

    Buck Fabian Society Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,982
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Caitlyn is a woman(‘s name) = Correct

    Gun Laws do(n’t) work = Correct

    The Economy is…well, an economy, and as such, as long as my head’s above water, well, that’s all right, = Correct

    Only Progressives are Progressive = Correct

    BLM doesn’t stand for Bureau Of Land Management and the Real BLM is better armed with attitude than the other Real BLM = Correct

    Black Folks are criminals and shouldn’t be shot, we need to keep them alive to learn from their mis-behavior = IDK-Correct

    All illegal immigration in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas is still wrong = Correct

    All ID’s must be issued for Free, as most states already do = Correct

    Allah is a god, a god who’s messenger spouted hate, bigotry and killing of ALL enemies = Correct

    Government to the rescue, they will only make matters worse = Correct





    How'd I do?
     
  3. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    26,816
    Likes Received:
    29,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Political Correctness = intellectual dishonesty
     
    Howdy, nickndfl, Bigjon and 2 others like this.
  4. Mujahideen

    Mujahideen Black Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,665
    Likes Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    • I agree with the OP, but I feel as if the war on drugs was conveniently left out.

    The notion that the police can raid your house or lock you up because you have a quarter of a joint in your ashtray all for the safety of everyone is ludicrous.

    The drug war isn't stopping anyone from doing drugs, and it never will, but it creates a system where blacks and others are systematically thrown into the system for seizing the economic advantages that was created by this black market.

    This war on drugs gives the government the right to violate people's rights, no knock raids, stop and frisk, "smelling marijuana" in a car and searching it, all the while targeting minority's because a lot of poor people do drugs.l create a situation where we have the police and blacks systematically clashing.

    This is what leads to black lives matter. Often the police are just doing their job... But your job is to lock adults up for selling drugs to adults?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2016
    mtnman, searcher, GOLDZILLA and 2 others like this.
  5. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Political correctness is basically trying to say things in a more polite way to not be overly offensive. Basically people trying to not be dicks. There isn't anything illogical about that.


    Umm no one thinks she was born a woman. People call her a woman out of respect for her wishes to be considered one. It isn't delusion because everyone is fully aware of the reality of the situations, just some people are not assholes, and since they don't care about what people call them self go along with it

    I don't agree with most of the gun laws, but this person obviously has no idea what they are talking about. They clearly don't actually know what the arguments for or against anything are, and they seem to be the delusional one. It is a common thing for people to try to portray anyone they disagree with as crazy or stupid or whatever, but it is better if you refute their actual arguments instead of strawman ones.

    Umm what does political correct stuff have to do with the economy? Saying the economy is good or bad has nothing to do with political correctness what so ever ever.

    They seem really confused. Do they know what political correctness is? It doesn't seem that they do.

    Obviously this person is just pushing bullshit propaganda at this point. None of this is at all true. They are just throwing out random things that sound shocking with no concern of facts or truth.

    Who actually believes that? I doubt you can find one person out of a 1000 who thinks that a baby becomes alive the moment the head emerges from the birth canal. That is like old school crazy Christian stuff, where they thought the soul came into the body at the exact moment of birth. No Progressives believe that. Also weren't we talking about political correctness? Political correctness isn't the same thing as being progressive. There is PC people on the right and the left, in all groups.

    I would go on but it becomes pretty obvious the person has no idea of political correctness is, and has a pretty flimsy grasp on reality.
     
  6. Unca Walt

    Unca Walt Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    7,579
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Floriduh
    "Umm no one thinks she was born a woman." [Wow. Ya think?]

    "People call her a woman out of respect for her wishes to be considered one." [People call HIM a woman because it is the latest pog, pet rock, beany baby, hula hoop craze and if you don't go along, you are a misogynist, racist, hateful, uncaring, nasty, less-than-human... and you don't wanna be that, do you. Especially since the PC-Alrics will enforce your "respect" or else.]

    Alric, you are a piece of work. I will anticipate more sideways stuff, but I finish with the absolute killer to PROVE that last sentence in red:

    Negro, colored, black, African-American... ALL, Alric, ALL of those terms were LEGAL TERMS in my lifetime. Legal. As in on mortgages, licences, etc.

    Negro used to be on Script ink bottles. It is now not a fucking real word anymore, according to Alric's Scrabble Dictionary. It is a word no longer permitted to be spoken aloud.

    PC-Alrics hit America. So now, while niggers all over America describe themselves every hour of every day in song (public), in conversations (public), signs (public), over radio, video, and TV as...

    ...niggers...

    ...white people can and have really been put in jail for saying the "n-word". A nigger school teacher called the police this week, empowered by PC-Alrics in POWER -- the crime? The little kid used the word "brownie".

    Alric abounds. PC GROWS: "Brownie" <-- My sister was one 70 years ago. I cook a different kind, similarly named. Yet Alric called the fucking cops to school.

    Alric abounds. PC GROWS: A semi-literate nigger caused the end of a pol's career when the pol used the word "niggardly", which, to a nigger, is close enough to something that sounds enough like a PC-Alric-level violation to explode over. In case Alric does not make the connection, this is in red. Compare this paragraph to the last sentence above in red for absolute proof. That it has NOTHING to do with politeness, and EVERYTHING to do with submission to disgusting, harmful PC-Alric philosophy.

    Alric abounds. PC GROWS: If you want more PC, go with Alric. But be careful:

    IT IS A BLACK HOLE. And you know what the African-American Christchildren think of that. They certainly, guaranteed, will/have come after you. Right?
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2016
    Buck, Eyebone, D-FENZ and 3 others like this.
  7. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    12,778
    Likes Received:
    12,443
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    I enthusiastically and whole-hardheartedly approve this message
     
    Unca Walt likes this.
  8. nickndfl

    nickndfl Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    10,262
    Likes Received:
    7,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Florida

    For as harmless as you think drugs are I can give you a list of names of family of friends who have died from overdosing. I see teenage kids smoking joints before school in the morning and wearing their trousers down to their knees. It's just not cool anymore to walk around stoned and be a burden to society. I know this because my judgement is not impaired since I do not get high. Yes, I might have a beer or two or a shot of liquor once or twice a month, but I do not walk around stupid.
     
  9. Mujahideen

    Mujahideen Black Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,665
    Likes Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    how is the war on drugs working out?

    This has been going on since Nixon? All we have are crowded prisons, a thriving black market that fuels gang-cartel violence and drugs readily available everywhere and literally no end in sight.

    Plus the police can raid your house and/or lock you up something that you choose to do to yourself.

    The police can simply say they smell weed in your car and search it, they can get an anonymous tip that someone is selling drugs out of their house and then raid it with guns drawn, and you can go to jail for having a plant. That's not America.

    And again, there is no end in sight to this. It's not like the police just have to do A, B, and then C and the drug problem is over. THERE IS NO END TO IT...

    And America already went through this mess with alcohol prohibition and the mobsters. It didn't stop anyone from drinking but we did get a whole bunch of bureaucracy from the government.

    Teens smoking a join outside of school? Consider that drug dealers don't ID, but stores would have to. It's easier to get pot than alcohol for a teen.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2016
    mtnman, Unca Walt, glockngold and 3 others like this.
  10. Fanakapan

    Fanakapan Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,578
    Likes Received:
    3,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Limeyland
    Actually Alric is totally correct in the sense that the author of the OP is 'Pushing Bullsh1t'. Effectively the opposite side of the coin from those pushing PC.

    Whilst I agree that the PC crapola is just that, I dont have a problem going round it. And none of the folks I know have bought into it. I'd have to guess it affects mostly the growing number of dickwads one see's these days who spend all their time with their heads down worshipping the DumbPhone :)

    Life gets less stressful once you accept that maybe 75% of humanity are more stupid than ought to be allowed by law, and need to be prevented from playing at the table :)
     
    the_shootist likes this.
  11. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113


    How does anyone enforce that? At worst you would be called a jerk or one of those things you listed, which isn't any more rude than the people trying to make fun of her for having been born a man. What you can dish it out but not take it? If you want to make fun and disrespect people, you can't really complain when people treat you in the same manner.

    If you insult people and get insulted back, that is your own fault. I don't see how you can whine and say it is unfair that they make fun of you, or disrespect you, when that is exactly what you are doing to other people. It isn't like anyone is getting thrown in jail or anything because they said something offensive, we all just call them assholes and bigots, which again isn't any worse than how they treat others. They really have no reason to complain.

    You know the old saying, treat people as you wish to be treated. If you want to be a jerk, expect people to be a jerk back to you.




    How is that even remotely relevant? Just because something was a legal term doesn't make it not offensive to people. You used to legally own slaves but that was pretty offensive too wasn't it?


    Show me a source to back up that claim. In the example you gave, that kid was never arrested.




    People don't like assholes working for them. If you work for someone and mistreat people, getting fired is expected. You want to go shop some place where the cashier curses at you for example? It shouldn't be that shocking that some jobs expect a certain level of politeness from employees.

    If you get fired from your job for being a douchebag, that isn't my fault, it isn't politicians fault, it isn't PC movement fault, it isn't the person you offended fault, it is your fault. Take some responsibility for your actions.

    The entire Anti pc thing basically comes down to people who want to avoid taking responsibility for their actions when they act like jerks to others. Apparently they don't seem to understand that we live in a society, and we have to interact with other people and if you treat other people like shit you might upset them.

    Now I said right at the start, that there is some situations where people take it too far, but I am not sure what you expect if you go around calling everyone niggers for example.
     
  12. nickndfl

    nickndfl Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    10,262
    Likes Received:
    7,507
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Florida
  13. Son of Gloin

    Son of Gloin Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2010
    Messages:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Delivery boy.
    Location:
    USA
    I agree with this whole post. The so called war on drugs is more a war on people, instead. Legalize everything that is natural and just hold people responsible for their actions, not the weeds they have wrapped in a paper.
     
    Unca Walt and Malus like this.
  14. Mujahideen

    Mujahideen Black Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,665
    Likes Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You would have to legalize coke and crack too, this isn't a pretty thing to say... But if you don't legalize it, there will be a black market and lots of money to make for selling it and then you get the violence and prisoners that comes with that.
     
  15. Son of Gloin

    Son of Gloin Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2010
    Messages:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Delivery boy.
    Location:
    USA
    I know. It's not a perfect idea. Legalizing cocaine and it's derivatives, poppy and it's derivatives, etc. is dangerous. But, we have the problems inherent in the effects of these drugs already, even though they're illegal, along with the unintended(?) consequences of the crime that goes along with it. Legalize them and make people responsible only for their actions and at least we do away with the drug gangs and the violence that goes along with it. Also, the poor guy with a bag of marijuana in his car doesn't need to worry about going to jail.

    Obviously, these drug laws, like gun laws, are all about control.
     
    Malus likes this.
  16. GOLDZILLA

    GOLDZILLA Harvurd Koleej Jeenyus Midas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    5,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have always thought that they ought to have places where all of that crap is legal. They could even give it away free so as to destroy the black market value entirely and make it not worth pursuing dope dealer as a viable career. There could be one in every county and the fiends (over 18 only) could go there and do their thing for free - no cops,no ambulances etc. They could even grow/produce it there legally maybe even pay a dollar an hour to the workers and charge a dollar a joint, ringer, spoon etc to the customer/workers. This would keep them contained yet free to do their thing at the same time.

    No more shootouts in the streets. No more innocents murdered in the crossfire. Empty the prisons so real criminals could move in and stay longer. major reduction in traffic deaths.
     
    Someone_else, Son of Gloin and Bigjon like this.
  17. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    12,778
    Likes Received:
    12,443
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    Great ideas if you want to improve a nation. Trouble is the politicians don't have any intention of doing that. They're going to get theirs until the cards start to fall, then they'll be headed for the hills
     
  18. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113


    Import a bunch of savages into western culture and political correctness stops people from calling a barbarian, a barbarian.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is called fear mongering and scapegoating. When you compare the amount of crime in the general population of places like the UK, then compare them to specifically the Muslim population, they are about the same. In other words, normal white Britain's rape people and so do Muslims. There are criminals in all groups.

    However if you blame all of societies problems on a small subsection of the population it is easier to manipulate people. You appeal to their tribal brain and you put all the blame on some made up enemy. Doing so allows leaders to stay in power, because when you are putting all the blame on say the Muslims, you are not looking at the actual causes of the high crime rate, which is the leaders fault. Thus politicians can escape accountability by scapegoating problems onto others. It isn't their fault, it is someone else's fault.

    It also riles people up, and gets them to turn out to vote. Just look at the entire Brexit debacle. There was actual legitimate reasons for why people might want to leave the EU, however they didn't run on those issues. Instead they said the same type of bullshit propaganda like you are, that evil Muslims are invading and they have to stop them! Of course it was just a manipulation tactic and then everyone finds out that they probably are not going to close immigration anyway and it was all just a lie to get their way.

    Of course they were lies, politicians lie. Come on now, you really think all a countries problems can really be solved by stopping immigration? You do realize that countries had problems prior to immigration right? Crime exists within all groups. This is just fearing mongering, and trying to push blame onto some small group so people can escape accountability, and you are all for it. You don't want to solve any of the real issues and problems in the world, you just want to appeal to gut emotions and find someone to blame.

    If you want to know the real problem in politics, it is people distracting everyone with stupid bullshit that clearly isn't true, and isn't the real problem. Then we can't talk about real solutions to real problems, because we are busy fighting over these relatively small issues that are just a distraction. On a scale of 1 to 10, in the US immigration problem is like a 2. A 10 would be like the pension problems that we are having all across the country, that has actually bankrupted many cities, and is a massive drain on everything.
     
    Fanakapan likes this.
  20. D-FENZ

    D-FENZ Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    2,738
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yabbut,

    What? Did you just get here? I'll tell you how they enforce that- It's codified in the f***ing law. A recent example and in case you have been hiding under a rock, the PC police now mandate unisex bathrooms under threat of the law.

    Need more? How about the bakery owners that get sued out of existence because of moral and religious objections to baking cakes for same-sex weddings. Why anyone would want someone to prepare them a cake, or any food for that matter when the bakers are unwilling escapes me... But yet, one gay couple was awarded $135,000 for the inconvenience. Mind boggling... There's more. North Carolina- the entire state of North Carolina was denied a scheduled concert because their pending laws didn't jibe with the PC whims of the musicians. Yes, they boycotted the state after selling them tickets. No word yet on the damages the state is able to collect from them... Only crickets... This insanity is everywhere and all around us.

    I realize that you are blinded by your own ideology, but are you also deaf and unable to smell?
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2016
  21. Mujahideen

    Mujahideen Black Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,665
    Likes Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, but I can think of one specific set of problems that can be solved by not bringing in massive amounts of immigrants who are hostile to the host nations culture... And that would be the rapes and robberies and terror attacks that those people commit.

    If you enter a nation seeking asylum, you have to abide by their rules and values. If it becomes clear that a particular group has trouble with this then you need to shut the door to them or else you will have conflict on a large scale. I call it cultural suicide. And that's what's going on in Europe.

    Maybe they can try again later or do a more vigorous screening, but letting Muslims into your nonmuslim country in mass is retarded.
     
  22. Merlin

    Merlin Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    2,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yet, when reporting the recent news, newscasters tell us that 10% of the population of France is Muslim, while 90% of France's prison population is Muslim. They attribute that disparity to the Muslims being a very disadvantaged group. They aren't telling us some nonsense about the crime rates being about the same.
     
    Howdy, JayDubya, Bigjon and 1 other person like this.
  23. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My mistake, I forgot you were one of those people who think businesses and corporations are people. I was talking about actual people. Anti discrimination laws stops wide spread discrimination in the market place, you are still perfectly free to be as bigoted as you want as an individual with no legal repercussions.
     
  24. D-FENZ

    D-FENZ Gold Member Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    2,738
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The US Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are in fact people. And yes they jail corporate officers even when they had no knowledge of the crimes their company is accused of perpetrating.

    Care to comment on the damages awarded to the state of North Carolina?
     
    Bigjon likes this.
  25. Rollie Free

    Rollie Free Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    3,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Its wasting time arguing with someone who's sophistication condemns them to think pc is about being polite.
     
    Unca Walt likes this.
  26. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah and they also ruled that people have the right to donate an unlimited amount of money to politicians. So since corporations are people they can donate an unlimited amount of money to politicians and thus why we have legalized bribing in this country. Which isn't even the only method they have opened up legalize bribing. Which is another thing I would put at a 10 on our list of problems in the US.

    I don't really know the details to that. Seems fairly simple though, if they had a contract and didn't fulfill it then they are in breech of contract, if not, then they are not.
     
  27. GOLDZILLA

    GOLDZILLA Harvurd Koleej Jeenyus Midas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    5,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THE funniest thing about p.c. is that it is always one way and the "equation" never balances out. IMHO, for something to be fair, it must work equally for everyone or it cannot work at all. Fairness is not about adding stress to the strong and giving freebies to the weak. Fairness does not mean rigging the race so that everyone crosses the finish line at the same time. Fairness means everyone gets an equal shot at their goals in life. and also, since every ones goals are different, the only fair way to deal with things is to let everyone chase their dreams and do their thing so long as their dreams do not involve robbery, rape or murder of someone else.

    Take for example the baker who does not want to bake a cake for people he does not agree with. He/she/it might be bigoted and stupid, acting against his financial best interest and losing or gaining future customers based on his action, but involving states and courts are not an answer and should never be in the realm of possibility unless the state owns or operates the business in question.

    There is vast cognitive dissonance involved in p.c. and one example would be the idea of discrimination. Every choice we make is discrimination. We decide what will work best for us and what will not work at all. Telling someone who they can or cannot hire/conduct commerce with based on anything at all other than their own judgement is actually substituting their own discrimination for some other entities discrimination against the individuals preferred choice. This is to me the same as believing that a person is not the true owner of themselves or their business.

    What would you think if a male could start suing random women for discriminating against him by denying him sex on the spot ?

    ex. "Your honor, Suzie denied me sex, but 5 minutes later she was nailing the whole football team behind the bleachers. She discriminated against me because I wasn't over 6 feet tall. I demand a cash award of 3 million dollars.

    (this should be awarded if you believe that she discriminated against him sexually by putting out to others and refusing to put out to him )

    Now, I don't believe for a second that it would be right, but for the cake guys and employers everywhere who are being sued, it boils down to the exact same argument.
     
  28. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Personally, I am all for getting the legal system out of discrimination cases and stuff. Instead we should just publicly shame people who are bigoted assholes. It is probably sufficient to shun and shame people who act like that, and so we shouldn't need to resort to force to get people to do stuff they don't want.
     
    Rollie Free and GOLDZILLA like this.
  29. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You should be looking in a mirror when you make such claims.
     
    Unca Walt, Rollie Free and Mujahideen like this.
  30. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never owned a business in which I discriminated against people just because they weren't like me.
     
  31. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's funny that the biggest bigoted assholes like yourself have trouble seeing yourself for what you really are.

    Blonde haired women of northern Europe were never afraid to go anywhere in their respective countries until politically correct assholes like you flooded their countries with Muslim men who seek to degrade and subjugate women.
     
    Howdy likes this.
  32. Alric

    Alric Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,268
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you are a blond haired women living in the northern Europe now? Speaking from experience? I can't speak from experience in that area but I can look at the statistics which show that you are full of shit. The idea that crime was nonexistent prior to immigration, and now everyone is being raped in the streets is a made up fantasy that exists only in mind of people like you, who are not connected with the actual realities of the world we live in.

    Also, all the common complains about immigrates are complaints that have been made about other immigrants groups throughout history. Immigrants are easy target to scapegoat problems onto because they are normally the least vocal and have the least amount of power to stand up for them self. People were saying the same things you are, 100 years ago about different groups.
     
  33. GOLDZILLA

    GOLDZILLA Harvurd Koleej Jeenyus Midas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    5,955
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Alot of the problem with immigrants could be solved by denying them welfare/ss for one decade from the day they arrive and instant deportation/prison if they even run a stop sign for that same amount of time or are not gainfully employed the entire time.

    There could also be a test where they must eat a ham sandwich, be surrounded by topless bikini chicks for a day without harassing them and drink a case of beer while hooked up to stress detectors.
     
  34. Dude

    Dude Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,502
    Likes Received:
    1,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even though the article went a little extreme on the abortion visuals and blurred the difference between political correctness and being scorned for not accepting blatant government propaganda/lies, the points made have merit. Alric's counters only have value if you print them out and line your birdcage with them.
     
    Mujahideen likes this.
  35. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pretend, ignore, look the other way. Just another day in the life of our PC liar alric.
    http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5386/british-girls-raped-oxford

    Nearly 400 British girls as young as eleven are believed to have been sexually exploited by Muslim rape gangs in Oxfordshire over the past 15 years, according to a chilling new report. It charges local officials with repeatedly ignoring the abuse due to a "culture of denial."

    The scale of the abuse in Oxfordshire, a county in southeast England, mirrors similarly shocking accounts of the sexual exploitation of white British girls by Muslim gangs in Bristol, Derby, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford, and implies that the problem is not isolated, but endemic.

    The 133-page Serious Case Review (SCR) was published on March 3, the same day that British Prime Minister David Cameron convened the so-called Downing Street Abuse Summit, during which he unveiled a raft of new measures aimed at bringing more offenders to justice.

    The report — which reveals that there are "grounds for believing" that 373 girls have been sexually exploited by gangs in Oxfordshire since 2004 — focuses on the accounts of six girls and their contact with the authorities. The girls were the victims in the "Operation Bullfinch" trial, in which seven Muslims were found guilty, in May 2013, of trafficking and raping the girls between 2004 and 2012.



    [​IMG]
    Seven members of a child sex grooming gang in Oxford who were found guilty in 2013 (clockwise from top left): Assad Hussain, Zeeshan Ahmed, Kamar Jamil, Bassam Karrar, Mohammed Karrar, Akhtar Dogar and Anjum Dogar. They were sentenced in 2013 to a combined 95 years in prison for raping, torturing and trafficking British girls as young as 11.



    According to the SCR, between 2005 and 2010, the six girls were reported missing 500 times — half of those when they were in the care of official child protection agencies — but authorities never bothered to investigate.

    In Section 2, the report includes extracts of the Prosecution's opening speech at the trial in order to "focus the mind" on the suffering endured by the girls. The men would "ply the girls with alcohol and introduce them to drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, 'crack' and sometimes heroin. The girls became addicted to certain of the drugs and felt unable to live without them. This made them even more dependent on the men."

    It continues:

    "Sometimes the men would also exercise extreme physical and sexual violence on the girls and threaten them that should they ever seek to free themselves from the grasp of the group they and/or their families would suffer serious harm.

    "The defendants took the girls to other places, usually hotels/guest houses or empty private dwellings, for other men to have sex with them, again often in groups and often in return for money which was paid to the men and not the girls.

    "Most of the men engaged in the sexual abuse of the young girls did so over many years. Each was much older than any of the girls and of an age to know precisely what he was doing; the harm he was inflicting on the girls; the fact of their suffering and that their activity was illegal and in many instances depraved. In short, their conduct was intentional and persistent. Many of the sexual acts committed on the girls were extreme in their depravity. The girls were usually given so many drugs that they were barely aware of what was going on. Indeed, they say that it was the only way they could cope with what was going on.

    "The sexual abuse included vaginal, anal and oral rape and also involved the use of a variety of objects such as knives, meat cleavers, baseball bats... sex toys.... It was often accompanied by humiliating and degrading conduct such as biting, scratching, acts of urinating, being... suffocated, tied up. They were also beaten and burnt. This sexual activity was often carried out by groups of men; sometimes it would go on for days on end.

    "The places to which the girls were taken were often private houses and guest houses in Oxford. Some of the private houses appeared to be empty and used solely for the purposes of the abuse. The men who came to pay to have sex with the girls were not always from Oxford; many travelled from far afield, places such as Bradford, Leeds, London and Slough. It seems they came specifically to sexually abuse young girl, often by appointment with the men in Oxford who had dominated the girls.

    "Between acts of abuse sometimes stretching over a number of days, the Oxford men ensured girls were guarded so that they could not escape. In addition to being abused in various locations in Oxford, some of the girls were taken to other towns and cities such as London and Bournemouth for the same purpose."

    Section 3 of the SCR shows how local authorities could have stopped the abuse as early as 2005, but failed to do so because they refused to take the girls' complaints seriously. The report includes dozens of comments the girls made during interviews, including:

    "I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance."

    "Why would a 13-year-old make it up?"

    "The social worker just wanted to hear what [the worker] wanted to hear so there was no need to do anything...."

    "The Police never asked me why — they just took me home."

    "I thought if I told the Police what was really happening they would not believe me, and they would not arrest them and then... they did not do anything and that made me think that nothing could be done."

    "I made a complaint about a man who trafficked me from a children's home. He was arrested, released and trafficked me again."

    "Oxford and another council argued about me to try and avoid doing anything. It wasn't my fault I was abused."

    "Social services washed their hands — 'it's your choice' I was told."

    "A WPC [woman police constable] found me drunk with men. I said I was ok and she went away and left me with them. I was abused that night."

    The SCR also shows that parents were exasperated at the lack of concern displayed by police and social workers, who often blamed the girls for the situation they were facing. Parental comments include:

    "Police wouldn't pursue anyone unless they had a cast iron case."

    "No one thought about us — what it would be like if it was their daughter."

    "Police wouldn't tell us addresses so we could go and bring her home."

    "She was a minor but we were told it wasn't our business."

    "I tried to tell social services about the evidence — but they weren't interested. It was obvious it was something sexual."

    "A big chunk of her life has been taken away — when she should have been at the youth club or skating or the school prom — all that went missing because of them: the perpetrators and the police/social services for not stopping it when they knew."

    "It's in my mind all the time — what happened to my 'baby' and what I did because I didn't understand what was happening to me. They knew what was happening to her and didn't tell me."

    "Why did they let it go on during the long investigation?"

    "No one spoke to us about dealing with the people responsible."

    "The police said she didn't appear in danger, they said she was happy to be there, and refused to tell me where she was."

    "Giving her a cuddle and taking her to MacDonald's was the [social worker's] solution."

    "One manager said [before the exploitation was understood] 'She's streetwise, and loves it.'"

    "[After a theft was investigated where a girl was with older men] The issue for the police was the burglary, not a 13-year-old with older men."

    "At interagency meetings attended no one kept any records/minutes, and there were never agendas."

    "The Children's Home didn't tell me when she went missing."

    "I despaired of ever getting an appropriate response that stood alongside us and didn't try to blame and shame us."

    And yet the report holds no one responsible or accountable. It blames the failure to act on a "lack of knowledge" and "organizational failings." The report concludes:

    "The Serious Case Review (SCR) has seen no evidence of willful professional neglect or misconduct by organizations, but there was at times a worrying lack of curiosity and follow through, and much work should have been considerably different and better. There is little evidence that the local understanding of child sexual exploitation (CSE), or how to tackle it once identified, was significantly different from many parts of the country.

    "On the surface, many of the illustrations described in the report can seem like professional ineptitude, unconcern, or inaction. They become more understandable when put in the context of the knowledge and processes at the time, practical difficulties around evidence, and a professional mind-set which could not grasp that the victims' ability to say 'no' had been totally eroded.

    "The overall problem was not grasping the nature of the abuse—the grooming, the pull from home, the erosion of consent, the inability to escape and the sheer horror of what the girls were going through—but of seeing it as something done more voluntarily. Something that the girls did as opposed to something done to them."

    According to the Telegraph, local authorities across Britain are expending "considerable intellectual effort" into finding reasons not to conduct mandatory public investigations into child sexual abuse out of a fear of "negative publicity."

    An investigation cited by the paper found more than 30 instances where local authorities refused to conduct a Serious Case Review, which is required by law whenever a child is seriously harmed as a result of abuse. When investigations were conducted, in many cases the reports failed to examine how "fear, overwork, timidity, willful blindness and over-optimism" had led social workers to make bad decisions.

    Speaking at a summit on child exploitation on March 3, Prime Minister Cameron said British social workers are in need of "a massive dose of common sense." Reading a quote from the report, he said:

    "One does not need training in child sexual exploitation to know that a 12-year-old sleeping with a 25-year-old is not right, or that you don't come home drunk, bruised, half-naked and bleeding from seeing your 'friends'."

    Cameron added:

    "I think it's very important we take a step back and just recognize the horrific nature of what has happened in our country. Young girls — and they are young girls — being abused over and over again on an industrial scale, being raped, being passed from one bunch of perpetrators to another bunch of perpetrators. And all the while this has happened with too many organizations and too many people walking on by. And we have got to really resolve that this stops here, it doesn't happen again and we recognize abuse for what it is."

    Under new plans announced at the summit, the government will seek to extend the crime of "willful neglect" that was recently introduced to protect the elderly in nursing homes to protect children from sexual predators. This would require teachers, social workers, police and elected officials to act on suspicions of child sexual abuse or face up to five years in prison. The new law would apply to all levels of the bureaucracy, from low- and mid-level employees to the most senior managers and directors.

    Some observers are skeptical about the effectiveness of Cameron's plan. In an interview with Sky News, Conservative Party MP Tim Loughton, a former parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Children and Families, had this to say about the Oxfordshire report:

    "A 'worrying lack of curiosity' is a very charitable way of saying 'clear incompetence and neglect' that went on in various agencies within the children's services department, within the social services and within the police in Oxfordshire."

    Loughton added that under the new law, "willful neglect" will be a high bar to prove. Prosecutors would need to show that authorities were "proactively obstructing people coming forward with allegations" and that there was "a conspiracy of cover-up or silence."

    British commentator Simon Kent is equally pessimistic. He writes:

    "It is a fact teachers, councilors, police, NHS [National Health Service] staff and social workers in England and Wales have categorically failed to protect young children from sexual predators for a generation.

    "Systemic failures have been condoned with silence, serial bunglers rewarded with promotion and whistle blowers shunned. Why is anything going to change now, after the event(s)?

    "It will be years before David Cameron's intentions are fully acted upon. All the while the abuse will continue, to the eternal shame of those who have the power but not the ideological or intestinal fortitude to stop it."

    Kent concludes: "Too little, too late. That's just not good enough."

    Soeren Kern is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Gatestone Institute. He is also Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter.

     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2016
  36. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
    Dude likes this.
  37. Fanakapan

    Fanakapan Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,578
    Likes Received:
    3,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Limeyland
    I concur with Alric on the Brexit vote. Many of those voting for Out were sold a bill of goods by what turned out to be a bunch of Bunco Artists who were nowhere to be found when the vote was counted.

    Immigration, despite its misuse by the Hucksters does have the power to cause severe problems. The simple act of importing millions who seem ill equipped for life in the 21st century will throw up plenty of problems which whilst initially being held at bay by government policy masquerading as PC, will sooner or later burst out. I'd venture that France must be pretty close to that point now ? And once the gig is up in one place, its up all over.

    I have to say though, I'm amazed at some of the Muslim community who have taken the attitude that what ever sh1t they pull, it will be put up with. History tells us, and should them also, that it'll be bus trips home at some point in the future.
     
    searcher likes this.
  38. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dude likes this.
  39. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    PC liar Alric is the one who is full of shit.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...intelligence-requirement-new-police-officers/

    The Swedish authorities have lowered the intelligence requirement for new police officers to make it easier for people to qualify, following a shortage in eligible recruits coming forward.

    In the forty years since the Swedish government decided to turn Sweden into a multicultural society, the rate of violent crime, and rape in particular, has soared to unprecedented levels. According to the Gatestone Institute, Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape by country, hitting 66.5 rapes per 100,000 people in 2012, second only to the tiny south African nation of Lesotho.

    In 2014, some 6,620 rapes were reported in Sweden, up from 421 reported to the police in 1975, an increase of 1,472 per cent. Violent crime meanwhile has risen by 300 per cent in the same period.

    The Swedish government has accordingly recognised that they must hire thousands of new police officers over the coming years, but struggling to find the recruits they are having to lower their entry standards.

    Last year the authorities had 300 places to fill at its national police academy, but could only find 266 recruits who made the grade. Stefan Annell, a psychologist at the Swedish Defence Recruitment Agency which handles the recruitment process for the police, has admitted that to fill the remaining places the authorities will be lowering the pass mark on its admissions exam.

    “What has changed is that the minimum requirement is reduced from a four to a three. That means there will be more people who go on to interviews and to take the personality test,” he told Swedish Radio.

    “This will mean applicants can have lower theoretical capacity, or general problem solving ability.”

    And the rules have also been relaxed to allow applicants who fail the test to reapply immediately, rather than having to wait a year or two to resubmit an application.

    Despite these changes, officials have insisted that the department is not making it easier to become a police officer by lowering the bar, as the exam is only one part of the admissions process.

    “You need to look at the entire admission process to the police academy,” said Bengt-Åke Nilsson, head of human resources at the police force.

    He insisted: “To say that the requirements are lowered is a little too hard. It does not reflect the entire admission process.”
     
    Howdy and Dude like this.
  40. Dude

    Dude Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,502
    Likes Received:
    1,461
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just don't know how people can ignore all this stuff...
     

Share This Page