The major difference between Mr Brown and Mr Garner is evidence. In the Brown case there is no audio or visual evidence of what exactly took place between Brown and his killer Darren Wilson. Just he said - she said type of stuff. Unfortunately the truth is somewhere in the middle but we'll never know. The only thing caught on camera was Mr Brown robbing a convenience store minutes before running into Darren Wilson. Not looking good for Mr Brown. In the Eric Garner case we have both video and audio of the cops harassing Mr Garner over the selling of loosie cigs. At that point in time he wasn't involved in selling loosies. He had just broken up a fight. The cops didn't want to hear that and didn't care for the fact that he had shown them "contempt" by daring to talk back to them. They decided to show him that "they were in charge" and attacked him in a gang. A perverted cop (Daniel Pantaleo) grabbed Mr Garner arongd the neck and literally choked the life out of him even as Mr Garner begged for his life 11 times. Sure as shit ain't looking good for the pervert Pantaleo and the rest of the cops that were there. Not looking good at all. It would be interesting to see and hear how the prosecutor steered the grand jury into letting a badged up perv killer go.