1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

Peer review; why it isn't a proof against bad science.

Discussion in 'Topical Discussions (In Depth)' started by Thecrensh, Sep 12, 2017.



  1. Thecrensh

    Thecrensh Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,932
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm a member of a private sports board that had a forum for political discussions. Several of the people who are members are in the Academic community...as professors and in other roles. They are all extremely progressive, and militantly so.

    During one discussion, one of them who is employed by a very prestigious university in the "research triangle" of NC posted this:

    Peer review is a voluntary, unpaid exercise. You know the old saying, you get what you pay for. People who do peer review wait 'til the last minute and often do a half-assed job. They squeeze it in while waiting at the airport or on a plane or while sitting in a meeting (yes, I'm guilty of this).​

    This same guy has debated me for literally decades about climate change and how the science is flawless because of PEER REVIEWED research and publications.
     
    Alton and Son of Gloin like this.
  2. Howdy

    Howdy Silver Member Silver Miner

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    1,147
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People who do "peer reviews" do not necessarily give fair and balanced reviews just because they are paid well or spend enough time preparing the reviews. PEOPLE HAVE AGENDAS. A "disinterested third party" is rare indeed, and you seldom have any way of knowing if they're disinterested or not.
     
    Alton and Thecrensh like this.
  3. Aurumag

    Aurumag Dimly lit. Highly reflective Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    7,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Lightwave Jockey
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Within my workplace, peer reviewing is critical prior to embarking on small and large projects with potential service effects.

    Within the academic community, and especially the medical community, peer reviewing is a just a credibility catch-phrase.


    YMMV
     
  4. Alton

    Alton Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    3,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Michiana
    Peer review is a farkin' joke. Here I am speaking of scientific and in particular medical peer review. Well over 80% of results and findings can neither be duplicated or substantiated. Stop and think about that...80%. Why would anybody trust any medical practitioner or "scientific findings or justifications" for ANYTHING?!?

    Here's a fun place to start...be sure to check the links in the article:

    Most Scientific Findings Are Wrong or Useless - Reason.com
     
    Zed, Usury and the_shootist like this.
  5. Zed

    Zed Size doesn't count! Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,354
    Likes Received:
    9,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Nuclear Technician
    Location:
    Springfield
    Peer review sucks ass, if we if we relied on it the earth would still be flat! Long live the mavericks and the independent thinkers! Committees discover fuckall that's original.

    That's the Australian perspective but we are a little bit rude.
     
    Thecrensh likes this.

Share This Page