1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

Redeem your lawful status as a State National.

Discussion in 'U.S. Constitution & Law' started by Bigjon, Dec 2, 2016.



  1. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,984
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Patrick Devine says its up to us to restore the Republic. Instead of sitting on our duffs and complaining.

    Interesting website: Takeaway points are the real basis for money is our labor.
    Labor is our property and can't be taken away from us, unless we let them.
    We have to stand up and demand our labor value returned to us.
    this is done via claiming all the labor contracts that are owed to us.

    Every time you enter into a contract there is a bid bond ucc trust opened up and also a performance bond ucc trust to get the monetary credits to accomplish xxx.

    We have to claim these back as belonging to us and then surrender them to the US treasury.

    This is how I perceive what I've listened to so far and may be subject to error.

    http://econcurrent.com/devine/

    Index

    calls.zip
    calls/
    dict/
    files.zip
    files/
    videos/

    Patrick says this info needs to be spread far and wide to save the Republic.
     
  2. michael59

    michael59 heads up-butts down Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    6,059
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    20 years logging
    Location:
    on the low side of corporate Oregon
    Well guy I don't know what Patrick is into with this take back...had to look again. Yeah I'm just not sure but I can tell you I sent two letters off yesterday telling the chief justice of Oregon whose name is Balmer and to that Wally that as I was duly convicted of, that that ment I was convicted in common law an a restart on same charges ment court was still in common law and I yes I had the court. Also told them I had the keys.

    I got a few surprises when I get to vernowhere.
     
  3. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,984
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here is another one, don't know if it works or exactly how to do it.

    This is at the end.


    So that we can once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world
    and keep ourselves in the real world (with all our "shields" in place
    against the fictional government) we must send a non-negotiable
    (private) "Charge Back" and a non-negotiable "Bill of Exchange" to
    the United States Secretary of the Treasury, along with a copy of our
    birth certificate, the evidence, the Manufacturer's Certificate of
    Origin of the STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge our portion of the
    public debt, releasing us, the real man or woman, from the debts,
    liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities
    and obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of "book
    entries" on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world
    of "digits" and "notes", not of money and substance. Property of the
    real man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy.

    Sending the non-negotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses
    our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our TDA? Title 26 USC
    section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: "The aggregate
    amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not
    exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual
    filing a separate return)."

    This $1,000,000 account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional "person"
    with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the
    purpose of making book entries, to move figures, "digits" from one
    side of ledgers to the other. Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers
    must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce
    dies. No movement, no commerce.

    The fictional persona of corporate government can only function in a
    functional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only
    fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits





    [TruthShallPrevail]



    Historical Development of Modern Feudalism:

    The TRUTH about your status as a slave in America

    (by unknowingly volunteering)


    by Allen Aslan Heart



    http://www.real-debt-elimination.co.../1-introduction_to_taking_back_your_power.htm




    Since 1933 you and all other Americans have been pledged for the debt
    of the UNITED STATES owed to international bankers, most of whom are
    foreign to our country. Your credit, labor, productivity and
    property have been used and is now being used as collateral by the
    incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA without your knowledge or
    consent. This is legal until you take back your implied consent by a
    special, lawful process.

    In fact, you are unknowingly volunteering to be chattel for a
    mortgage held by financiers from the founding of this nation.
    Perhaps you infer that the name on the tax statement is yours and so
    you respond as though it were. This is voluntary servitude. To make
    this servitude legal it was necessary to "cut a hole in the fence."
    No matter that the escape route is hidden, obscured by legal brambles
    to make escape difficult. That it is not used presumes consent. It
    is not impossible, just seemingly difficult and even implausible.

    Your status as a subject is based upon a presumption that if you did
    not wish to be so encumbered you would use the law to do something
    about it. As long as you do not use the escape route provided by law
    it is presumed that you are content to "remain in the pasture and be
    milked and used as chattel." This word has the same root as the
    word, "cattle." Do you get the picture?

    Can such a premise be true? It seems totally out of step with
    everything you and I have ever known about our world, our nation, our
    government and our relationship to it! Our parents never behaved as
    though they we were chattel. They dutifully paid their taxes, voted
    in elections, waved an American flag on the 4th of July. Our
    teachers taught us about our history, our Declaration of Independence
    and Constitution, our Revolutionary War, how we fought the greatest
    army and navy the world had ever seen at the time. Nowhere in our
    history classes did we encounter any such premise of subjection to a
    central government that rules our lives. Our civics teacher never
    told us anything about this. Nothing in our world even hinted that
    we were subjects to a highly centralized government. Surely this
    could be true of other peoples, but not of us! For most people this
    cannot be. The truth cannot be heard because it is too discordant
    with our entire experience.

    And yet we can document that George Washington did not chop down a
    cherry tree, Lincoln did not free the slaves (they became subjects of
    the Federal District, the District of Columbia), The War with Mexico
    was begun by General Zachary Taylor's provocations along the Nueces
    River, the battleship Maine blew up from the inside, Woodrow Wilson
    knew that the Lusitania was carrying US munitions to the war in
    Europe and would be sunk, Franklin D. Roosevelt had maneuvered the
    Japanese into an attack on Pearl Harbor and had cut fuel shipments to
    the Pacific fleet to ensure the presence of enough old ships to offer
    a tempting target, Truman knew that there were other good
    alternatives to an invasion of Japan and did not need to drop the
    Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Roosevelt knew about the NAZI
    concentration camps, LBJ knew that there was no attack on the Maddox
    and Turner Joy in the Gulf of Tonkin when he asked for a
    Congressional Resolution to attack North Vietnam, and the US
    government had been warned by numerous documented sources that there
    would be an attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. All
    of this is from documented historical sources. Yet we continue to
    believe the myths that are in our histories, our movies, our
    mainstream media and our mass consciousness. John F Kennedy warned
    us that,

    The great enemy of the Truth is very often not the lie - deliberate,
    contrived, and dishonest - but the myth - persistent, persuasive and
    realistic.

    You will probably find it hard to accept that you have been living in
    an illusion for your whole life. Much of what you believe is an
    illusion and you will only find your freedom when you can allow
    yourself to look behind the veils of illusion to see Reality. WHO you
    are is far greater than "what" you perceive yourself to be. When you
    have the courage to stand face-to-face with the illusion and call it
    what it is, you will have stepped through the most difficult task set
    before you on your Earth Journey. There IS a way out! But the only
    way out is through—through understanding how we came to this
    predicament and following a precise formula to obtain your
    sovereignty. We have been warned repeatedly throughout our history,
    but we weren't listening very closely. Now we might have one more
    chance to take back our power and our sovereignty.

    The nature of the conspiracy to defraud can be best understood in
    comments by one of the major conspirators in the triumph of
    establishing the Federal Reserve, "Colonel" Edward Mandell House, who
    is purported to have said this in a private meeting with President
    Woodrow Wilson:

    "[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their
    biological property in a national system designed to keep track of
    the people and that will operate under the ancient system of
    pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our
    agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat
    paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer
    being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and
    we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of
    the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.



    Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of
    lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to
    remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
    They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value
    designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not
    one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident
    one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible
    deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund
    government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form
    of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge
    profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a
    contributor to this fraud which we will call `Social Insurance.'
    Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we
    may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our
    servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and
    without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high
    office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot
    against America."

    We now know how to respond to this treasonous fraud. All my life I've
    looked for the roots of war, injustice and oppression because if we
    can find the basis of the rampant injustice in the world, we could
    relieve enormous struggle and suffering. I've wondered at how little
    the Constitution seemed to affect the courts and how often the truth
    was buried in silence. Mostly I saw greed and heartlessness in a
    power struggle played out in politics. But I didn't realize that the
    game had been played in secret throughout American history. And
    ultimately, it is a game of monetary policy and politics…. with a
    spiritual component.

    Like you, I've watched and participated in the American scene for
    many years. I've written many letters to the editor, congressmen,
    senators, presidents, distributed campaign literature to precincts,
    represented my precinct at county conventions, served food at Loaves
    and Fishes, planted flowers at the feet of police threatening to
    arrest those who had taken over HUD homes designated for the
    homeless, worked with Welfare Moms, served as chairman of church
    social ministry, fasted, spoke to churches on social justice,
    supported the protestors at Honeywell demonstrations against the
    manufacture of cluster bombs, arrested for a war toy protest, booked,
    finger-printed, arraigned, marched in protest of the Vietnam War, the
    Gulf War, and the attacks on Serbia and Kosovo.



    A Peak into the Mind of a Tory

    In 1999 I watched in utter amazement as the Supreme Court of the
    United States overturned the Florida State Supreme Court's decision
    to proceed with a recount of the contested ballots and the Eleventh
    District Court decision to uphold the decision of the Florida court.
    In Orwellian doublespeak, Antonin Scalia wrote on Saturday, December
    9, 1999:

    "the counting of the votes that are of questionable legality does in
    my view threaten irreparable harm to [Bush], and to the country, by
    casting a cloud upon which he claims to be the legitimacy of his
    election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a
    recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance
    democratic stability requires."

    It was a brazen and Orwellian declaration. What American who believes
    in democracy could claim that something was wrong with counting
    votes "first"? What American who believes in democracy could declare
    one candidate the winner and protect him from "irreparable harm" if a
    vote count showed him not to be the winner, after all? Of course, it
    doesn't make any sense, unless you realize the foundation upon which
    Scalia based his transparently partisan remarks. He doesn't believe
    in democracy, he doesn't even believe in republicanism, he is a
    monarchist.

    Scalia revealed his true motivations when he spoke on the subject of
    capital punishment at the University of Chicago (February 2002).
    During his remarks, he stated: "The reaction of people of faith to
    this tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind
    government should not be resignation to it, but the resolution to
    combat it as effectively as possible." ("God's Justice and Ours" at
    http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0205/articles/scalia.html )

    Democracy obscuring divine authority behind government? Perhaps this
    helps shed some light on why Scalia and the four other right-
    wing "justices" could so easily subvert our election process and,
    through an act of divine intervention, usher the son onto the throne
    lost some eight years earlier by his father, George I. We are
    assuming that we are still independent sovereigns and freemen as
    declared by our Declaration of Independence and that the Constitution
    is still in effect. Scalia has no such illusion. History supports
    his position, sorry to say.

    Scalia is an ideologue so accustomed to our willingness to continue
    to be subjects that he does not even consider the ideal of a
    government of, by, and for the people. That ideal has remained as
    useful fiction to be taught in Civics classes and mouthed by the
    politicians. HE KNOWS that we are mere chattel by presumption.
    Since we have not even discovered that our status as freemen has been
    lost through more than two hundred years of our history, much less
    withdrawn our implied consent to be subjects, we are presumed to be
    subjects before the courts and in the minds of people like Scalia.

    Scalia speaks of civil disobedience with contempt and quotes the
    Bible, "Ye must needs be subject." We must, as mere servants of the
    ruling class, acquiesce to our divinely guided leaders. For who are
    we, as mere subjects, to question those who make (or interpret) the
    laws? After all, he says that "government carries the sword as 'the
    minister of God,' to 'execute wrath' upon the evildoer." No, he has
    not reverted to a justice of another time—WE have by our ignorance
    and silence, acquiesced to a lower status reminiscent of another
    time.

    There you have it! In his eyes, we are subjects unworthy of honor,
    peace and justice. Somehow Scalia's statements seem like a long way
    from the Declaration of Independence in which Americans stood before
    the world as sovereigns invested with certain inalienable rights,
    including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
    After the American Revolution, the monarchies of Europe saw Democracy
    as an unnatural, ungodly, ideological threat, every bit as radical
    and dangerous as Communism was regarded by Western nations upon its
    inception. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia spawned
    other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided
    an example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow
    their European monarchies. What has happened? When did we give up
    our natural, God-given rights? Our forefathers fought and won that
    war didn't they?



    Sovereignty, Revolution, Birth of a New Nation

    Yes, our forefathers fought one of the bloodiest wars in history and
    won their independence. They understood the historical roots of war,
    injustice and oppression, and we've lost this knowledge. Our history
    books did, indeed, leave out a lot of the truth and lied about much
    of the rest. History teachers often teach history in such a way that
    young students swear to never again study history! When I attempted
    to teach American History from sources outside the history books I
    was forced from my 26-year teaching career by my principal. We have
    been led and lulled to forget WHO we are. All this has been
    engineered by those who would keep us ignorant of the truth.

    The primary reason for the War for Independence was not "taxation
    without representation", but the forced payment of taxes to the King
    in gold instead of paper money. America was flourishing by using her
    own "fiat money" system based only on production, not a gold-based
    system that could be manipulated by the King. The King could
    not "control" the fiat money system and therefore passed a law
    requiring that taxes be paid in gold only. The King had most of the
    gold—the colonies had little; so unemployment ensued—and embittered
    colonists cried for war. Benjamin Franklin put it this way, "The
    colonies would have gladly born the little tax on tea, and other
    matters, had it not been that England took away from the colonies
    their money." Prior to the Revolutionary War, The Times of London
    said this regarding fiat money in America:

    "If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origins in North
    America, shall become endurrated down to a fixture, then that
    government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off
    debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to
    carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in
    the history of the world. The brains and the wealth of all the
    countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed
    or it will destroy every Monarchy on the
    globe."

    The truth is that the Revolution failed. You might say that we won a
    military victory over the most powerful military force on the planet
    at the time. However, reading the Treaty of Paris it is clear that we
    were not exactly negotiating as equals.

    We had won the recall of British troops but not the bankers. Even
    though we are taught that we won our independence from England, we
    actually were able to remain free from the international bankers for
    only a few years at the close of the presidency of Andrew Jackson.
    The most visible of the power structure was the East India Company
    owned by the bankers and the Crown in London, England. This was an
    entirely private enterprise whose flag was adopted by Queen Elizabeth
    in 1600—thirteen red and white horizontal stripes with a blue
    rectangle in its upper left-hand corner. All debts owed before the
    war were to be collected by the foreign creditors.

    When the creditors of the new nation found the Articles of
    Confederation to be inadequate to exact payment from their young
    debtor, the Constitution was written and supported by the bankers
    through their associates, for increase their control over the United
    States of America. Had the Articles of Confederation been completed
    and adopted, instead of the Constitution, the bankers would have had
    far less control.

    Any constitution must have some prior reference to establish its
    foundation. The authority for the American Constitution is based
    upon the Bible; the Magna Carta, signed in 1215 by King John; the
    Petition of Rights, granted by King Charles I in 1628; the English
    Bill of Rights, granted by William and Mary in 1689; the right of
    habeas corpus, granted by King Charles II, and the Articles of
    Confederation. Any and every constitution thereafter must have an
    enabling clause. From this point onward, no constitution may
    diminish, in any manner, those rights already established in the
    above six documents.

    The Declaration of Independence established that all people are
    sovereign under God's Natural Law. Sovereign people of the various
    states, created the state governments for the protection of their
    rights. They delegated certain authority from the people's powers by
    and through the state constitutions in order that the three branches
    of government could properly carry out the dictates outlined in the
    State constitutions to protect our rights.

    The States then created the United States.

    The American Constitution created a new structure of government that
    was established on a much higher plane than either the parliamentary
    system or the confederation of states. It was a
    people's "constitutional republic," where a certain amount of power
    was delegated to the states and a certain amount was delegated to the
    federal government. The United States, by way of the Congress of the
    United States, has certain powers delegated by the Constitution. So
    far as the several States party to the Constitution are concerned,
    the United States may not exercise power not delegated by the
    Constitution. All power not delegated to the United States by the
    Constitution is reserved to the several States within their
    respective territorial borders—or, to the people.



    British Subversion, Banks, and Treason

    Even though the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War in 1783,
    the simple fact of our existence threatened the monarchies where it
    hurts most: financially. The United States stood as a heroic role
    model for other nations, which inspired them to also struggle against
    oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the
    Polish uprising (1794) were, in part, encouraged by the American
    Revolution. Though we stood like a beacon of hope for most of the
    world, the monarchies regarded the United States as a political
    infection, the principle source of radical democracy that was
    destroying monarchies around the world. The monarchies realized that
    if the principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the
    rest of the world might avoid the contagion and the monarchies would
    be saved.

    Knowing they couldn't destroy us militarily, they resorted to more
    covert methods of political and financial subversion, employing spies
    and secret agents skilled in bribery and legal deception; it was
    perhaps the first "cold war." In the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United
    States agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as
    reparations for the American Revolution. The US Senate ratified the
    treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When
    Benjamin Franklin's grandson published it anyway (perhaps our first
    whistleblower), the exposure and resulting public up-roar so angered
    the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so
    federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting
    the truth about the government.

    Since we supposedly had won the Revolutionary War, why would our
    Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they
    agree to pay £600,000 sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It
    doesn't make sense, especially in light of the Senate's secrecy and
    later fury over being exposed… unless we assume our Senators had been
    bribed to serve the British monarchy and betray the American people!
    That is treason!

    From the beginning, the United States Bank had been opposed by the
    Democratic-Republicans lead by Thomas Jefferson, but the Federalists
    (the pro-monarchy party) won the vote. The initial capitalization
    was $10,000,000 -- 80 % of which would be owned by foreign bankers.
    Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its
    paid capital), it was a profitable deal for both government and the
    bankers, since they could lend, and collect interest on $10,000,000
    that didn't exist.

    However, the European bankers outfoxed the U.S. government, and by
    1796, the US government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to
    sell most of its shares. By 1802, our government owned no stock in
    the United States Bank!

    Thomas Jefferson had warned,

    If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue
    of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the
    banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children
    wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The
    issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the
    people, to whom it properly belongs.

    Several short-lived attempts to impose the central banking scheme on
    the United States were defeated by the patriotic efforts of
    Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln.



    Bank Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption

    Chief among the international financiers was Amshel Bauer of Germany
    who, in 1748 opened a goldsmith shop under the name of Red Shield.
    (in German the name is spelled Rothschild and is pronounced Rote-
    shilld). In 1787, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous
    statement: "Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not
    who writes the laws." He had five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob,
    Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five Rothschild brothers expanded by
    opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London, and Naples.

    The objective behind this bank was to receive special privilege to
    use the unjust fractional reserve banking to print money and loan it
    to the government and industry. No money could go into circulation
    without interest being paid to the bankers.

    Fractional reserve banking is very simple. It is simply a special
    privilege given to a man or group of men to create credit out of thin
    air; by extending this credit/debt to everyone else in society who
    does not have the same privilege, and then collecting from society
    the money plus interest, they become very rich without having to
    produce anything of value.

    The basic mathematics behind this system is very clear. If this
    system is left in place long enough, the man or group who controls
    this system of debt creation will own all the gold available in the
    nation. Once the supply of real money (gold) is in his or their
    hands, this man or group of men becomes the master of the entire
    nation. Why? Because this man or group of men controls the only
    source of operating medium (money) available through which the nation
    functions. Only the man who has the privilege of printing the money
    and loaning it at interest can determine who gets special funding—his
    friends and allies. Everyone else is limited to how much money they
    have access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the
    friends and allies of this "banker" will own all of the nation—just
    as America is now owned by a very small cadre of very wealthy men.

    How long this process takes to work its way through the wealth of the
    nation depends upon how successful the "banker" is in forcing,
    through bribery and corruption, the restriction of the formal
    government's issuance of real money backed by gold or silver. As the
    supply of real money shrinks, the people of the nation are forced to
    rely on the creation of a fictitious debt by the privileged few to a
    greater and greater extent, until finally, the only thing left is a
    massive amount of "unpayable debt," created from nothing and
    consisting only of the interest charged upon the fictitious debt, and
    collecting interest for every moment of its existence. All for the
    benefit of the privileged, who become the de facto (illegally
    usurped) government because of the "money power" they wield.

    Through the Bank of England, the Rothschilds demanded a private bank
    in the United States to hold the securities of the United States as
    the pledged assets to the Crown of England in order to secure the
    debt to which our government had defaulted. As one of his first acts,
    President Washington declared a financial emergency. William Morris
    with the help of Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, heavily
    promoted the creation a private bank to service the debt to the
    international bankers. In 1791, Congress chartered the first national
    bank for a term of 20 years, to hold the securities of the same
    European bankers who had been holding the debts before the war. The
    bankers loaned worthless, un-backed, non-secured printed money to
    each other to charter this first bank. In December 12, 1791, the Bank
    of the United States opened its doors in Philadelphia.

    The holder of the securities was the private bank. So under public
    international law, the creditor nation forced the United States to
    establish a private bank to hold the securities as the collateral for
    the national debt. James Madison had warned, "History records that
    the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit,
    and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments
    by controlling money and its issuance."



    British Subversion, Titles of Nobility and Treason

    For the early decades of US history, relations between the United
    States and Great Britain remained strained. Their relationship
    deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 1803.
    Britain imposed a blockade on neutral countries such as the United
    States. In addition, the British took American sailors from their
    ships and forced them to serve in the British Navy. Concerned about
    the many English spies and troublemakers, Congress passed an
    amendment to prevent those who had English titles and connections
    from obtaining any seat in government. Called the Titles of Nobility
    Act (TONA), it reads as follows:

    "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or
    retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent
    of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or
    emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or
    foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United
    States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or
    profit under them, or either of them."

    All "titles of nobility" were prohibited in both Article VI of the
    Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Section 9 of the
    Constitution of the United States (1778), but there was no penalty.
    Although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional "title
    of nobility" amendment was deemed necessary and was proposed in 1789,
    again in 1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of
    ratification delivered to the Secretary of State, an attorney with
    the title, "Esquire," disappeared. As a result, there still is no
    penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from foreign rulers today,
    just the prohibition.

    Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in "titles of
    nobility" and "honours," that anyone receiving them would be required
    to forfeit their citizenship. Obviously the Amendment carried much
    more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent
    today. They knew that our freedom could be subverted from inside our
    government and had sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today
    most Senators and Congressmen, all Federal judges, and some of our
    Presidents are attorneys who carry the title "Esquire" often
    abbreviated as "Esq." The Constitution still forbids this,
    nevertheless.

    In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys, but most held
    no "title of nobility" or "honor." There was no requirement that one
    be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney
    general, or judge; a citizen's "counsel of choice" was not restricted
    to a lawyer and there was no state or national bar associations. The
    only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar
    Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in
    London. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank "Esquire" -
    a "title of British nobility."

    "Esquire" was the principle title of nobility which the 13th
    Amendment ought to prohibit from the United States. Why? Because
    the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers was suspect! Lawyers with
    an "Esquire" behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members
    of an organization whose principle purposes were political and
    regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for
    members of the KGB or the CIA.

    The archaic definition of "honor" (as used when the 13th Amendment
    was ratified) meant anyone "obtaining or having an advantage or
    privilege over another." A contemporary example of an "honor"
    granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge:
    Lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and
    powers, non-lawyers generally cannot. We address the judge as, "your
    Honor."

    By prohibiting "honors," the missing, but now found, original 13th
    amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that would grant some
    citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or exercise political
    power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 13th
    Amendment was to insure political equality among all American
    citizens, by prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from
    claiming or exercising a special privilege or power (an "honor") over
    other citizens.

    Both "esquire" and "honor" would be key targets of the 13th Amendment
    even today, because, while "titles of nobility" no longer apply now
    precisely as they did back in the early 1800's, it is clear that
    an "esquire" or bar attorney receives far better treatment in and by
    the courts as well as by the public at large in general, whereas if
    you represent yourself (pro se) or speak as a freeman (pro per), you
    are treated as though you were rabble. Your opinions are of little
    importance in court and you are often treated similarly by government
    officials. Because you are not "esquires" or bar attorneys, you are
    considered to be a useless eater, a subject "out of control." The
    concept of "honor" remains relevant, possibly more so today than at
    any previous time in U.S. history, for they, the "honors," are
    greatly feared and even revered, even by the esquires who are
    considered to be below them. Since the Original 13th Amendment has
    never been repealed, all acts of government since 1819 are
    technically null and void since most lawmakers, prohibited from
    participation in government by the Constitution and who should even
    be stripped of their right to be a US Citizen under TONA, have
    continued to interject themselves into the political process.

    When the people discovered that European banking interests owned most
    of the United States Bank they saw the sheer power of the banks and
    their ability to influence representative government by economic
    manipulation and outright bribery. On February 20, 1811, Congress
    therefore refused to renew the Bank's charter on the grounds that the
    Bank was unconstitutional. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000
    in specie (money in coin) by European investors, which in turn,
    precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. This "war"
    was punishment for America refusing to do business on the terms of
    the International Banking families of the House of Rothschild,
    through the first Bank of the United States. Congress refused to let
    the National Bank renew its Charter.

    Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson's victory in the Battle of New
    Orleans, the War of 1812 produced a string of American military
    disasters. The most shocking of these was the British Army's burning
    of the Capitol, the President's house, and other public buildings in
    Washington on August 24 and 25, 1814. (Americans had previously
    burned public buildings in Canada.) During the War of 1812 our
    national archives and many libraries and document repositories were
    burned and some of the evidence of the TONA disappeared.
    Nevertheless, the legislature of Virginia ratified the amendment and
    it was subsequently printed in many official publications as the 13th
    Amendment, even in states which had NOT ratified, such as
    Connecticut. But beginning in 1832 it began to disappear from texts,
    although official state publications continued to publish it as late
    as 1876.

    There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy's efforts to
    subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge,
    others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, national
    archivist David Dodge discovered a book called 2 VA LAW in the
    Library of Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, "This is an un-
    catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a plan to
    overthrow the Constitutional government by secret agreements
    engineered by the lawyers of the time." That is one of the reasons
    why the TONA was ratified by the state of Virginia in the particular
    manner in which they did, although the alleged "notification" thereof
    was a long time thereafter claimed to have been "lost in the mail."
    You see, there is no public record that this aforementioned book
    exists either!

    That may sound surprising, but according to the Gazette
    (5/10/91), "the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare
    books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts." There may be
    secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a
    missing Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary
    disarray appropriately describes our situation today: we are
    inundated with information that we have not had the time or interest
    to sort through. As a result we have lost a precious treasure in the
    chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty.

    One amazing aspect of the War of 1812 was the existence of a
    depression during wartime. War always brings a short-term prosperity,
    except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is vital for
    you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially
    created through the restriction of a medium of exchange—money. This
    restriction keeps money OUT of circulation. Fewer dollars available
    to facilitate production and distribution means poverty and
    starvation.

    The precariousness of government finance during the war and the post
    war recession convinced the Republican government under James
    Madison, to re-establish a national bank. Thus was created the Second
    Bank of the United States in 1816.

    In January 9, 1832 The Second National Bank applied for a charter
    renewal 4 years early. This time President Andrew Jackson vetoed the
    Bank's recharter on the grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional
    and he successfully paid off the national debt leaving the U.S. with
    a surplus of $5,000. He said, "If congress has the right under the
    Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use
    themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations."

    On January 30, 1835, President Andrew Jackson attended a
    congressional funeral in the Capitol building. As he exited, Richard
    Lawrence, an unemployed house painter, pointed a pistol at Jackson
    and fired. The percussion cap exploded, but the bullet did not
    discharge. The enraged Jackson raised his cane to strike his
    attacker, who fired again. The second weapon also misfired and the
    sixty-seven-year-old president escaped assassination at close range.
    Jackson was convinced that Lawrence was hired by his political
    enemies, the Whigs, to stop his plan to destroy the Bank of the
    United States.

    Andrew Jackson violated public international law because he denied
    the creditor his just lien rights on the debtor. However, the
    bankers did not lend value (substance), so in actuality they had an
    unperfected lien. Therefore the law actually did not apply.



    The End of the American Republic: the Shadow Government is Born

    In 1860-61, the Southern states walked out of Congress. This created
    sine die, a situation in which not enough representatives were
    present to carry on legislative business. This was a constitutional
    crisis that the newly elected president, Abraham Lincoln, had to
    resolve.

    The Introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session,
    1973) summarizes the situation as best as possible:

    "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of
    their lives under emergency rule. . . And, in the United States,
    actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have –from,
    at least, the Civil War—in important ways, shaped the present
    phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency."

    From the research information available, it can be reasonably proven
    that when the Southern states walked out of Congress on March 27,
    1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution for the
    united States of America was lost. Thus, the only votes that Congress
    could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the
    time to reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, vote to adjourn and
    set a date, time, and place to reconvene at a later time, but
    instead, Congress apparently abandoned the House and Senate without
    setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of Congress,
    when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-
    a; literally "without day") and thus when Congress adjourned sine
    die, it ceased to exist as a lawful deliberative body, and thus the
    only lawful, constitutional power that could declare war was no
    longer lawful, or in session.

    It can also be reasonably proven that the Southern states, by virtue
    of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and
    that some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine
    die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the
    Constitution for the united States of America apparently ceased to
    exist. On April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed an executive
    order, Lincoln Executive Proclamation 1, and it can also be
    reasonably proven that the united States of America have been ruled
    ever since by the President under executive powers.

    It can also be reasonably proven that when Congress eventually did
    reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the
    Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies
    or by Constitutional Law, thus placing the American people under
    martial rule ever since the "national emergency" declared by
    President Lincoln. Thus, the Constitution for the united States of
    America has subsequently temporarily ceased being the acknowledged
    law of the land in many courts, and the President, Congress, and the
    courts have unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the
    Union in a new image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions
    were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were
    taken which presumed to place the Union under the new form of
    control.

    President Lincoln apparently knew that his executive orders no longer
    had any force under Constitutional Law. So he commissioned General
    Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) apparently as a special code to
    govern his actions under martial law and to justify the seizure of
    power, which further extended the laws of the District of Columbia
    and which also fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I,
    Section 8, Clauses 17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of
    Washington, D.C. and into the several states. General Orders No. 100,
    also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, have
    apparently extended the laws of war and private international law
    into the American states, and the United States government has become
    the presumed military conqueror of the people and the land of the
    several American nations.

    Martial rule has apparently been kept secret and has never really
    ended. Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete the
    implementation of his plan to constitutionally and not militarily
    reform the Southern national governments and restore Congress. Ever
    since the united States of America has been ruled under military law
    under the Commander of Chief—the President—and his assumed executive
    powers according to the policies of Executive Orders: a military
    dictator type function.

    Constitutional law under the original Constitution for the American
    states is apparently enforced only as a matter of keeping the public
    peace under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under martial
    rule. This "peace" is further evidenced in the Preamble of the so-
    called Expatriation Act of 1868. Under martial law, title is a mere
    fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that
    property which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt
    from taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the "enemy" to
    reside.

    In proclaiming the first Trading with the Enemy Act by Executive
    Order, President Lincoln set in place the means by which the federal
    government could interact with Americans who were not 14th Amendment
    citizens. They could technically be designated as enemies. Are you
    beginning to understand how We the People could be at odds with
    our "government?"

    In a message to Congress December 3, 1861, Abraham Lincoln answered
    the banker's argument that the people could not be trusted with their
    constitutional power, the political and monetary system of free
    enterprise conceived by our Founding Fathers, by saying:

    "No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up
    from poverty -- none less inclined to take or touch aught which they
    have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering a political
    power which they already possess, and which if surrendered, will
    surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they,
    and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them, till all of
    liberty shall be lost."

    In 1865, just before the close of the Civil War, President Lincoln
    declared his new monetary policy:

    "The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency
    and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government
    and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these
    principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest.
    Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity….
    The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme
    prerogative of government, but it is the governments' greatest
    opportunity."

    Had it been implemented, it would have ushered in a worldwide
    economic renewal. Unfortunately, a few weeks after its introduction,
    Lincoln was assassinated because he defied the bankers in proposing
    to print interest free money to pay the war debt. Thus, the
    government continued to operate fully under the authority of private
    law dictated by the creditor.

    Since President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete
    plans for reforming constitutional government in the Southern States
    and end the martial rule by executive order, the 14th Amendment to
    the Constitution has further created a "new citizenship" or "status"
    for the expanded jurisdiction. Laws for the District of Columbia were
    proposed and passed by Congress in 1871, the District of Columbia
    being incorporated as a private, foreign corporation by The District
    of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, and all states in the Union were
    apparently reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the
    corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new union of
    American states. What remained of the government was the private side
    under the rule of the bankers.

    The first attempt by Congress to define citizenship was in 1866 in
    the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Revised Statutes section 1992, 8
    United States Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that:

    "All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign
    power are declared to be citizens of the United States."

    And this in turn was followed in 1868 by the adoption of the
    Fourteenth Amendment, United States Code Annotated Amendment 14,
    declaring:

    "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
    the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of
    the State wherein they reside."

    At this period of time, the only people in the United States who were
    under the jurisdiction of the private bifurcated government of the
    ten miles square of Washington, D.C., were the government employees,
    those within the territories owned by the United States and now the
    former slaves. The former citizens of the South, now "captured"
    became 14th Amendment citizens. The remainder of the people could
    still invoke the power over government through original jurisdiction
    of the Republic side of the Constitution.

    A new 13th Amendment was enacted December 18, 1865 and the 14th
    Amendment was enacted July 28, 1868. It was ratified in Southern
    states under martial law. A state could only obtain its freedom from
    federal military rule by ratifying this amendment. Any contract
    entered under duress is null and void. But then the Constitution was
    not even in effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial
    law.

    The 14th Amendment brought the freed slaves, whose previous owners
    were private plantations and transferred those slaves under
    subjection of the government, the ten miles square jurisdiction of
    Washington, D.C. And it offered its protection to those who would
    choose to become its subjects…in exchange for their sovereignty.

    The 14th Amendment is a good example of the "give-a-little, take a
    lot" strategy that is often used, a sugar coating to a bitter pill.
    Sovereign Citizens had created a government to guarantee them their
    rights. In contrast, the federal government created fourteenth
    amendment citizenship to guarantee its power over its citizens. It
    seems to be taking citizens under its protection but at the price of
    servitude. Sovereigns may choose to become subjects; free men and
    women to become vassals. This amendment has always been
    controversial. Many people over the years have questioned the amount
    of power it vests in the federal government. Some have even
    questioned its validity. On one occasion Judge Ellett of the Utah
    Supreme Court remarked:

    "I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its
    faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly
    approved and adopted. State v. Phillips, Pacific Reporter, 2nd
    Series, Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975)

    However, the most important fact about this amendment is that,
    although it created a new class of citizen, it did not have any
    effect on Sovereign Citizens. Both classes still exist: When the
    Constitution was adopted the people of the United States were the
    citizens of the several States for whom and for whose posterity the
    government was established. Each of them was a citizen of the United
    States at the adoption of the Constitution, and all free persons
    thereafter born within one of the several States became by birth
    citizens of the State and of the United States.

    Both classes of citizen still exist. It's your right to be a
    Sovereign Citizen, while it's a privilege to be a fourteenth
    amendment citizen, and most importantly, it's up to you to determine
    which one you are, and which one you want to be. Just remember that
    you "pay" for a privilege, whereas a right carries no obligation.
    This is at the heart of your personal Declaration of Independence.



    Two Governments, Two Flags: the Corporate State

    Once the smoke settled after the Civil War, European international
    bankers arrived in town. In 1871 the default again loomed and
    bankruptcy was imminent. So in 1872, the ten miles square District
    of Columbia was incorporated in England. A loophole was discovered
    in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the
    international bankers. They realized that a separate nation by the
    same name existed that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8,
    Clause 17.

    The Congress shall have power:

    To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such
    district (not exceeding ten square miles) as may, by cession of
    particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of
    government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over
    all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state
    in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines,
    arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings; - And

    To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
    into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by
    this constitution in the government of the United States, or in any
    department or officer thereof.

    This "United States" is a Legislative "Democracy" within the
    Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States.
    It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its Citizenry, the residents of
    the District of Colombia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway
    Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a Citizen
    by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized Citizens).

    Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations.
    One "United States," the Republic of fifty States, has the "stars and
    stripes" as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal
    United States' flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe,
    seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the
    Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala.,
    Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under
    the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative
    Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).

    The international bankers and the Congress conjured up this bit of
    mischief and passed it into law. But whose law? Congress broke faith
    with We the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed a private
    corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia.
    They used the Constitution through the 14th Amendment, as their by-
    laws, therefore taking their authority not under the Constitution but
    taking their authority over the constitution. They copyrighted not
    only the constitution but also many related names such as, THE UNITED
    STATES, U.S. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA as their own. This is
    the final blow to the original constitution. Hence forth, the UNITED
    STATES has been governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated
    by the banks as creditors.

    The "Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia,"
    Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United States, Session
    III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that the
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is
    applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the
    District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to
    the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County,
    State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the
    UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this provision, the military
    Congress of the UNITED STATES had obtained the power to pass private
    international law for application within the federal District of
    Columbia. All States of the Union adopted new legislatively
    created 'conditions' and 'codified' their laws under federal
    mandate. State 'codes' were unlawfully adopted despite their origin
    as instruments of sovereign people. However, We the People remained
    sovereign.

    UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that
    the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What was not said in 1871, but
    was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3):
    That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the
    corporation. Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private
    International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety,
    is Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the
    District of Columbia.

    This incorporation was first reported by Gary W. Phillips, whose
    career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service began in 1956.
    He was the INS director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years and began
    challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000).
    After nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to
    flee his country to protect his life after exposing the facts of the
    illegality of the federal government's criminal income tax collection
    scam -- facts that are becoming well know among informed people
    throughout the country.

    Where did the Congress find the authority in the Constitution to
    reconstitute any part of the united States as a corporation? Quite
    simply, the 1791 Constitution was set aside to make room for the
    corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? No, the private,
    corporate bottom line is profit. The municipal, public bottom line is
    service. To replace our service-oriented form of government with a
    profit-oriented form of government without our knowledge or consent
    can only be described as treason.

    A few superficial changes were made to the original Constitution and
    it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not change the name of
    the document so they could claim to be reading from the Constitution.
    They merely changed it from the Constitution for the united States of
    America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They
    changed the "for" to "of'" and capitalized all the letters. All of
    the sudden we had two Constitutions, the original for show and the
    revision for actual use.

    The Act of 1871 provided a government for the District of Columbia
    and created a corporation entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whose
    jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the
    municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia.
    Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of
    Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed
    within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only
    in the District of Columbia and it's possessions.

    The States of the Republic are not possessions of the District of
    Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are possessions of
    the District of Columbia as well as property legally titled to the
    UNITED STATES by states and counties.

    The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District
    of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International Law and is
    applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of
    jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business
    prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia or Federal
    territories. The federal court has no venue outside of the District
    of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the
    District of Columbia and its possessions. The Congress cannot pass a
    law that is applicable in the several States of the Republic.

    If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private
    International Law, including all of the UNITED STATES CODE and the
    statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and
    enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then how could they
    have become the law of the land? Because, not knowing better, We the
    People allowed it. We have allowed agents of foreign countries to
    build an illegal corporation that has systematically corrupted every
    state, county and city in this nation and corrupted the status and
    standing of most people of the united States of America. The only way
    that a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT can have jurisdiction over a
    Sovereign is if the latter volunteers to the jurisdiction or fails to
    declare his independence as a Sovereign.

    This corporation has created dozens of agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA,
    and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands of agents who
    receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their friends
    and families while enforcing the private edicts of the so-called
    Congress. The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then
    direct their illegal agencies to destroy those who do not fully
    conform to their wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do.
    Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and conviction
    by federal authorities outside of the District of Columbia.

    The question now leads to whether our duly elected public officials
    swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of
    America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by a
    service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF
    THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation?

    It appears by their actions that most government employees, knowingly
    or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES. It
    is our duty as the People who elected them into office, to demand
    accountability from our "public" officials and confront them as to
    where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous
    corporation that is controlled by foreign agents from within and
    without, or is it with our constitutional Republic, the united States
    of America and her citizens?

    An articulate defender of a conservative monetary policy, President
    James A. Garfield urged the resumption of specie payments and the
    payment of government debts. He said, "Whoever controls the volume
    of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and
    commerce." In his Inaugural Address in 1881, Garfield said:

    The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the
    currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave
    doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the
    Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The
    present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the
    necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and
    currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in
    coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory
    circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If
    the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.

    Garfield was assassinated after only two hundred days in office, 80
    days after being shot by a lawyer, ostensibly because he was upset
    about not receiving an ambassadorial posting to France.

    In 1909, default loomed once again. The US government asked the
    Crown of England for an extension of time. This extension was
    granted for another 20 years on several conditions. One of the
    conditions was that the United States permit the creditors to
    establish a new national bank. The bankers moved deeper into our
    nation by the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, the
    IRS to collect the interest on their loans made to the UNITED STATES,
    and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, was the condition for
    the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced
    the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the mercantile system of
    ancient Babylonian.

    With the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the UNITED
    STATES was firmly lashed to the yoke, so that a small number of very
    rich men have been able to lay upon the people a yoke little better
    than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-
    compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by
    the American people today ($80,000 per American). This vast
    accumulation of wealth concentrates immense power and despotic
    economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers "who are
    able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying,
    so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and
    grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so
    that no one dare breathe against their will." A worldwide tyranny is
    gradually being imposed, hidden to most, by the money masters.



    First World War

    In 1917 we were drafted into the First World War. President Woodrow
    Wilson had to find a way to persuade the American public to go along
    with an intervention in another of Europe's wars. Although
    restrained to be neutral in the deadly conflict by the Neutrality
    Act, he sent our navy to shepherd British convoys across the
    Atlantic. German U-boat commanders did not take the bait and avoided
    contact with the US destroyers. To force the issue, a US naval ship
    sailed into the midst of a battle between British and German naval
    fleets and was sunk. But when the truth was learned, Wilson had to
    find another way.

    The Lusitania was a speedy warship refitted by the British as a
    passenger liner. Unknown to its passengers the Lusitania was
    carrying a huge cargo of military equipment and munitions in
    violation of the US Neutrality Act. The Germans knew that and tried
    to warn the passengers by placing advertisements in prominent US
    newspapers. The US State Department ordered all of the newspapers to
    refuse the ad. Only one newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa, bravely
    published the information. To ensure a successful provocation, the
    Lusitania was ordered to sail at 75% speed using only three of its
    four powerful engines. Then the naval escort was ordered away
    leaving the Lusitania vulnerable as it entered the war zone. The
    first torpedo hit the explosive cargo and blew the bottom out of the
    Lusitania. It sank in only 18 minutes. 126 innocent civilians died.
    Wilson now had his provocation to rally Americans behind the "War to
    End All Wars."

    The US participation in WWI exacerbated the national debt so that it
    became impossible for us to pay it off in 1929. It also enhanced the
    War Powers Act that President Lincoln, by Executive Order put in
    place during his Presidency. This War Powers Act was re-enforced and
    the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was passed to define,
    regulate, and punish those who were trading with enemies, who were
    then required by that act to be licensed by the government to do
    business. This will become more important later on.



    The Great Depression: From Sovereignty to Servitude

    We all know what happened in 1929. This was the year of the stock
    market crash and the beginning of The Great Depression. The stock
    market crash moved billions of dollars from the people to the banks.
    This also removed cash from circulation for the people's use. Those
    who still possessed any cash, invested in high interest yielding
    Treasury Bonds driven higher by increased demand. As a result, even
    more cash was removed from circulation in the general public to the
    point where there was not enough cash left in circulation to buy the
    goods being produced. Production came to a halt as excess inventory
    overwhelmed the market. There were more products on the market than
    there was cash to buy them. Prices plummeted and industries plunged
    into bankruptcy, throwing millions of people out of work.
    Foreclosures on homes, factories, businesses and farms rose to the
    highest level in the history of America. A mere dime was literally
    salvation to many families now living on the street. Millions of
    people lost everything they had, keeping only the clothes on their
    backs.

    In Europe, the International Bankers in 1930 declared several nations
    bankrupt, including the United States. In 1933, immediately after
    Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office, his first act as President was
    to publicly declare the United States bank holiday. He further went
    on to issue his Presidential Executive Order on March 5th, 1933 that
    all United States Citizens must turn in all their gold in return for
    Federal Reserve Notes. This was passed into law by Congress on June
    5, 1933.

    We the People turned in all our gold at that time. Why? Were we
    United States Citizens? No. We were still a sovereign people until
    that time. We just thought that we were required to turn in all our
    gold. Only those people living in Washington, D.C., and the 14th
    Amendment Citizens were so required. As sovereigns, we were not
    under the jurisdiction of the United States of America, which
    incorporated in 1872.

    When we turned in our gold, we just volunteered to be citizens of the
    jurisdiction of the ten miles square of Washington D.C. and their
    laws. We became 14th Amendment Citizens. Our birth certificates, the
    title to our bodies, were registered at the Department of Commercial.
    This title to our bodies, all of our property and all of our future
    labor, was pledged to the International Bankers as security for the
    money owed in bankruptcy. This was done under the authority of
    commercial law (Babylonian law) by and through Title. The American
    People were not in bankruptcy. Only the Corporate UNITED STATES was
    in bankruptcy. But with the US Corporation holding the title to your
    body and life, you could be used for collateral to secure the
    national debt through the birth certificate given by parents
    voluntarily to be entered into the Commercial Registry. This act, in
    commerce, gave Title to your body by way of a "constructive"
    contract.

    Next, the government created an artificial 'person' in your name, a
    corporation, a fictitious entity to take its place in a virtual
    reality of contract law and corporations. By and through an adhesion
    contract, the government then made you, the real man or woman,
    responsible for that fictional entity, a fiduciary and surety for an
    artificial entity. Your artificial entity secured the National debt
    and through it, you became a 14th Amendment Citizen of the UNITED
    STATES. In other words, they got you to think and act as though you
    really were that fictional entity. You agreed by your action or
    failure to act. YOU adhered to a contract offer because you thought
    or acted as though you were the receiver of the offer. In doing so,
    YOU were presumed to have ACCEPTED THE CONTRACT.

    All licenses and all existing contracts are made between the UNITED
    STATES or THE STATE OF (whatever state you live in) and your
    artificial entity. That fictitious entity binds you to the UNITED
    STATES and its sub-corporations because they have, through adhesion
    contract, made you, the real man or woman, fiduciary and responsible
    for that artificial entity. Of course, you voluntarily sign, and
    even request, all those contracts, don't you? It seems to be your
    name, although you probably never spell it all in capital letters as
    they do. They wish for you to think nothing of the aberration,
    perhaps just something they do to be clear and error-free.

    All of these contracts you sign carry with it your agreement to obey
    and uphold all the laws, rules and regulations passed by the Congress
    of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION and THE STATE OF. . . . and will be
    enforced against you.

    From that day forward, We the People, once upon a time sovereigns who
    created government for our convenience and welfare, could never own
    property in allodium because the state now had possession of it all.
    In 1964, the state obtained title to all private property. You can
    only "rent" homes that you believe you own by paying taxes. You only
    have a certificate of title to the car you think you own, and you
    continue to drive it because of your yearly fee. The state owns the
    true title to our homes, our cars, to everything we thought or think
    we own. You married the state through your marriage license and your
    children became wards of the state. All of this was pledged,
    including all the fruits of your future labor, to the bankers as
    security against the national debt and was placed in the possession
    of the Secretary of State of each state as an agent for the Trustee
    of the Bankruptcy, the U.S. Secretary of Treasury. Not knowing the
    rules of the game you went directly to jail, you could not pass GO
    and you could not collect $200.



    Cows in the Pasture or Freedom: the Hidden Choice

    The way out of this is dilemma can be very complex. In fact, its
    complexity was intentional. Roosevelt had violated the law by
    placing us into servitude without our consent. Congressman Louis T.
    McFadden brought formal charges against the Federal Reserve and the
    Secretary of the Treasury and was coming dangerously close to calling
    for impeachment of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Two months AFTER the
    Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate and House of
    Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st Session, at 4:30 pm approved House
    Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold
    Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint Resolution to assure
    uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States, which
    formally declared the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES.

    F.D.R. by Executive Order declared the people outside federal
    territories to be the enemy by illegally altering the Trading with
    the Enemy Act of 1861, revised 1918.

    The creation of Federal Zone citizenship further tightened up when
    you applied for your Social Security number after 1935. The benefits
    offered by this contract were hurriedly and voluntarily entered into
    when the Social Security Act was signed into law. Further contracts
    were to be entered into and license to be applied for–all voluntary
    actions. We unknowingly were entering into lifelong servitude to
    receive the benefits of the Lord of the Manor. We had descended into
    feudal vassalage without recognizing it.

    President Roosevelt then called all the Governors into Washington D.
    C. for a conference. This was the beginning of the states losing the
    remainder of their sovereignty. It was not until 1944 that the
    corporate states lost all their power over the corporate United
    States with the Buck Act. With this Act, the states became,
    essentially, 14th Amendment Citizens as well. This completed the
    destruction of the corporate states having any power to protect
    against usurpation by the U.S. Government. The corporate states went
    under the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.

    Strangely enough, on October 28, 1977, HJR-192 was quietly repealed
    by public law 95-147. The joint resolution entitled "Joint resolution
    to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United
    States" approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463), shall not apply to
    obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section.

    The reason for the repeal of HJR-192 is somewhat obscure. After 44
    years of unchallenged implementation, this public policy is clearly
    established by custom, usage and participation in the credit system
    by the American public. Those of us operating on the privilege of
    limited liability, via the public credit, are still bound.

    The adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code by all States in 1964 and
    a number of other like laws and Acts were incorporated into this
    nation. This made the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Supreme Law
    of the Land.



    Courts Shift from Common Law to Equity and Admiralty Courts

    Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the
    Continental United States provides for legal cases: at Law, in
    Equity, and in Admiralty.

    (1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to
    lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of
    the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a
    common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual
    forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons,
    liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to
    cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot
    lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of
    another individual, then the common force—for the same reason—cannot
    lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of
    individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as
    long as you don't infringe upon the life, liberty or property of
    anyone else. Law does not compel performance.

    Today's so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations,
    orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but
    just because something is called a "law" does not necessarily make it
    a law. [There is a difference between "legal" and "lawful." Anything
    the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]

    (2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any
    contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a
    particular situation. The term "equity" denotes the spirit and habit
    of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the
    intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is
    specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.

    (3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a
    civil contract with a criminal penalty.

    By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity
    actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable,
    and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and
    was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned
    everything—the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States
    and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the
    people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone
    from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government,
    through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with
    limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with
    gold or silver coin.

    The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial
    law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the
    Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the
    same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the
    procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions
    were based upon public law—or that system of law that was controlled
    by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court
    decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.

    Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the
    Negotiable Instrument's Law, which is a branch of the international
    Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the
    Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform
    throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of
    the UNITED STATES.

    In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which
    the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education,
    highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States
    of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United
    States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The
    fifty States accepted the "benefits" offered by the Federal United
    States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the
    Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate
    States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United
    States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the
    Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the
    credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of
    federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.

    This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of
    government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is
    what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a
    Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law.
    Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of
    every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or
    municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for
    them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use
    a so-called "benefit" offered, or available, to them, from
    government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law
    guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial
    agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and
    intentionally. See Howard Freeman here:


    http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

    In 1976, Congress took away any semblance of law or justice left
    within our court system. All law today is now construed, constructed
    and made up by the judge as it happens before your very eyes. Common
    law has almost disappeared from the courts. They took away any
    control or authority we might have had over the court system. This
    has been very well hidden from all of us.

    Many of us going into court often wonder why and how the courts can
    simply override the laws we put into our paperwork. It's very simple
    now that we know how they do it. They operate on the words `construe
    and construct.'

    A simple word such as `in' changed to `at' as in `at law' or `in law'
    has a totally separate meaning. For example: If you're in the
    river, you are wet, you can swim, etc., but if you're at the river,
    you might enjoy a refreshing picnic, play baseball or run races. See
    the difference a simple word can make? And, the attorneys often
    change this word when they answer your motions – in addition to many
    others.

    It will pay you in dividends to read the answers of attorneys to your
    paperwork. Compare what they say the case law says to the actual
    case law itself. You'll discover that they have actually changed the
    words therein. This is illegal, you might say. No, not, according to
    the US Code.

    You see, they can now construe and construct any law or statute to
    mean whatever they decide it means, for their benefit. You don't
    know any of this. You think they are railroading you in a kangaroo
    court. No, they are `legal' in what they do. They usually follow
    the law to the letter; Their law, private law, the law of contract,
    that you know nothing about. This law is called contract law.



    Uniform Commercial Code: Contract Acceptance and Honor

    If you don't understand contract law or realize what law you are
    dealing with when you go into court, you will lose. Even if you have
    filed your UCC-1 and have captured your Title and your artificial
    entity, this makes no difference in the above courts. Why? They
    operate in total fiction, in the land of Oz. They can only recognize
    contracts. And you are a real sentient being. (Still with numerous
    adhesion contracts attached to you). Whatever you file in that court,
    whether it is your UCC-1 or Law from the Judicial and Original
    Jurisdiction side, that is real, Lawful, truth. They do not
    recognize truth of any sort. They only recognize fiction and contract
    law. So, when you go into any court, be aware that it is their law,
    that the judge or the prosecutor can `construe' and `construct' that
    law in any fashion they choose. It will always mean what they choose
    it to mean.

    So, are the courts bound by the Constitution? Law? Statutes? No,
    contracts only and the statutes used to enforce the contracts.

    When used in conjunction with one's signature, a stamp
    stating "Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207" is sufficient to indicate to
    the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals
    (called "courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his
    Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial
    obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter
    knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in
    any Common Law contract.

    Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute being enforced as
    a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be
    construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the
    tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the
    individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the
    remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former
    status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights,
    guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those
    about him "curse the darkness" of Commercial Law government, lacking
    the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the
    Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its
    territorial venue. Howard Freeman



    Summary of Historical Development of Modern Feudalism

    THE UNITED STATES as a corporation, created in England, came under
    the jurisdiction of England. This entitled England to create laws as
    England saw fit to do, establish those laws in THE UNITED STATES and
    everyone who at that time was a 14th Amendment Citizen were subject
    to obey those laws. This also placed the Congress of THE UNITED
    STATES above that portion of what we think is the constitution, not
    under the authority of the constitution. Copyrighted, remember? The
    only Bill of Rights left at this point in time is four Amendments --
    13th, 14th 15th, and 16th. That is all the Courts are required to
    take cognizance of when you appear in their courts.

    The 1929 stock market crash and the Great Depression that followed
    placed the American people in desperation, homelessness, poverty and
    even starvation. The minds of the people were focused on survival.
    They were then in a condition to accept any handout given by the
    government, no matter what the cost to their
    freedoms.

    We were drawn in as 14th Amendment Citizens through the registration
    of our birth certificates. We were further enticed deeper into that
    system by volunteering for many other licenses and privileges given
    by the government. We were also made enemies of THE UNITED STATES.
    This act gave the UNITED STATES authority, under the laws of war and
    as a captured people, to force anything on us they choose to create.

    Then, in 1976, Congress removed any semblance of justice in our court
    system with Senate bill 94-201 and 94-381. From this point forward,
    the 'officers of the court' can construe and construct the laws to
    mean anything they chose them to mean.

    As 14th Amendment Citizens, we are not citizens of the America we
    have always thought. We are actually citizens of England, through
    the corporation of THE UNITED STATES.

    There is no law today except as fiction of copyrighted statutes, to
    be interpreted by 'judges' who construe and construct whatever they
    choose to have those statutes mean.

    We, as sovereigns irresponsibly recognized the Crown of England (IMF)
    as PRINCIPLE of America. In reality, the IMF was the Creditor of the
    UNITED STATES, a corporation, but NEVER you. The Creditor of the
    UNITED STATES designed invisible contracts to ensnare the sovereign
    people of America as subjects. The Creditor of the UNITED STATES
    implemented the invisible contracts through apparent 'color of law'
    and the sovereigns irresponsibly agreed. We, as Sovereigns, through
    the invisible contracts, and our irresponsibility to reject the
    Creditors (IMF) ideas, have voluntarily given our substance to the
    mythical creator of our situation.

    You'll find that there is a common thread woven throughout our entire
    history and that thread is commerce, the merchant, the money-changer
    (banks), the law merchant, i.e., the law of commerce, civil law and
    maritime law. This is not to say that commerce is bad. It does,
    however, say that commerce brings with it the laws of commerce.
    Wherever commerce goes it brings laws that can bind people into
    slavery. This can happen only if the people agree with it.

    Banks create "money" today out of thin air; then, they charge, we,
    the people, interest on their creation. This can happen only if the
    people agree with it. Thereafter, the merchants and the bankers
    create laws, through lawmakers whom they control, that protect
    commerce and bind the people to obey. This can happen only if the
    people agree with it.

    The only reason this occurs is that we do not handle our own
    affairs.



    Me and My Shadow: the Fictional STRAWMAN

    The elected and appointed administrators of government United States
    government have been filing certified copies of all our birth
    certificates in the United States Department of Commerce as
    registered securities. These securities, each of which carries an
    estimated $1,000,000 value, have been (and still are) circulated
    around the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side
    of ledgers, etc., just like any other security. There's just one
    problem—we didn't consciously authorize it. Now that you know, you
    can choose to let them use you for collateral and pay interest on the
    debt or you can take back your power and sovereignty.

    The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume
    20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785 we find "The United States government is a
    foreign corporation with respect to a State" (NY re: Merriam 36 N.E.
    505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a
    fictitious "person" (it cannot speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it
    cannot, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a
    transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the
    fictitious person, and the fictional world in which it exists, to the
    real world. Why is this important?

    LIVING people exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world.
    But government exists in a fictional world, and can only deal
    directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states,
    etc. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there
    must be a connection, a liaison, a go-between. This can be something
    as simple as a contract. When both "persons", the real and fictional,
    agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse,
    dealings, there is communication, an exchange. There is business.

    But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the
    real man and woman—through the use of a representative, a liaison, a
    go-between. Who is this go-between that connects fictional government
    to real men and women? It's a government-created shadow, a fictional
    man or woman, a corporation with the same name as yours.

    This PERSON was created by using your birth certificate as the
    Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the state in which you
    were born as the "port of entry." This gave fictional UNITED STATES
    government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly. This PERSON
    is a STRAWMAN.

    STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin - A man of straw, one of no substance, put
    forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law
    Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of
    STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, STRAWMAN.

    STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take
    part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction, one who acts
    as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real
    property and executing whatever documents and instruments the
    principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to
    conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose
    otherwise allowed.

    Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the
    term "STRAWMAN" as "A weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be
    easily confuted; or a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually
    questionable transaction".

    The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for
    the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a
    nonentity. The STRAWMAN is a "shadow", a go-between.

    For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country
    have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or last
    name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one
    step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no
    provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are
    not to be used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING
    else is not correct. Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J.
    Smith or J.A. Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other
    variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real,
    living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or
    a fictitious man such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.

    Over the years, government, through its "public" school system, has
    managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep us all ignorant of
    some very important facts. Because all facets of the media have an
    ever increasing influence in our lives, and because media is
    controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government and
    its agencies, we have slowly and systematically been led to believe
    that any form/appellation of our name is, in fact, still us as long
    as the spelling is correct. This is not true.

    We were never told, with full and open disclosure, what our
    government officials were planning to do ... and why. We were never
    told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a
    fictitious "person". We were never told that government had quietly,
    almost secretly, created a shadow corporation, a STRAWMAN for each
    and every American ... so that government could not only control the
    people, but also raise an almost unlimited amount of revenue; so it
    could continue, not just to exist, but to GROW.

    We were never told that when government deals with the STRAWMAN it is
    not dealing with real, living men and women. We were never told,
    openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since
    June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never
    told that we had been pledged (and our children, and their children,
    and their children) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created
    by government officials who created treason in doing so.

    We were never told that they quietly and cleverly changed the rules,
    even the game itself, and that the world we perceive as real is in
    fact fictional - and its all for their benefit. We were never told
    that the STRAWMAN—a fictional person, a creature of THE STATE—is
    subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances,
    etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man and woman, are
    not. We were never told that we were being treated as property, as
    slaves, albeit comfortably for some, while living in the land of the
    free—and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud. We never
    realized that we were being abused. By knowing the difference between
    our real self and our STRAWMAN and behaving accordingly, we regain
    our proper sovereignty over "legal fictions" and the ability to
    experience true freedom which is our birthright, for the enjoyment of
    the Divine in us all.

    There's something else you should know: Everything, since June 1933,
    operates in COMMERCE. Why is this important? Commerce is based on
    agreement, on contract. Government has an implied agreement with the
    STRAWMAN which they created and the STRAWMAN is subject to government
    rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh and blood
    man and woman, infer that they are trying to communicate with us and
    therefore step into their commercial "process" we become the "surety"
    for the fictional STRAWMAN. Reality and fiction are reversed. We
    then become liable for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the
    STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real (protected by the Constitution)
    character as we stand in for the fictional STRAWMAN.

    So that we can once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world
    and keep ourselves in the real world (with all our "shields" in place
    against the fictional government) we must send a non-negotiable
    (private) "Charge Back" and a non-negotiable "Bill of Exchange" to
    the United States Secretary of the Treasury, along with a copy of our
    birth certificate, the evidence, the Manufacturer's Certificate of
    Origin of the STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge our portion of the
    public debt, releasing us, the real man or woman, from the debts,
    liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities
    and obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of "book
    entries" on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world
    of "digits" and "notes", not of money and substance. Property of the
    real man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy.

    Sending the non-negotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses
    our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our TDA? Title 26 USC
    section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: "The aggregate
    amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not
    exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual
    filing a separate return)."

    This $1,000,000 account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional "person"
    with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the
    purpose of making book entries, to move figures, "digits" from one
    side of ledgers to the other. Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers
    must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce
    dies. No movement, no commerce.

    The fictional persona of corporate government can only function in a
    functional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only
    fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits
    .

    Corporate, STATE courts only have jurisdiction over the STRAWMAN. A
    presentment from fictional government—whether traffic citation or
    criminal charges—is a negative, commercial "claim" against the
    STRAWMAN. This "claim" takes place in the commercial, fictional world
    of government. "Digits" move from one side of your STRAWMAN account
    to the other, or to a different account. This is today's commerce. In
    the past we have addressed these "claims" by fighting them in court,
    with one "legal process" or another, and failed. We have played the
    futile, legalistic, charade—a very clever distraction—while the
    commerce game played on. We were playing checkers whereas the rules
    were MONOPOLY.

    But what if we refused to continue playing the charade, and played
    the commerce game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow
    and movement of entries, figures and digits, for our own benefit? Is
    that possible? And if so, how? How can the real man in the real
    world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game
    exists?

    When in commerce do as commerce does - use the Uniform Commercial
    Code (UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the
    world that CANNOT be broken and it's the foundation of the Accepted
    for Value process. The power of this document is awesome.

    Since the TDA exists for the STRAWMAN - who, until now, has been
    controlled by the government - WE can gain control and ownership of
    the STRAWMAN by first activating the TDA and then filing a UCC-1
    Financing Statement. This does two things for us.

    First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds
    in the account. This allows us to also move entries, figures and
    digits ... for OUR benefit.

    Secondly, by properly filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement we become
    the "holder in due course" of the STRAWMAN. A filed UCC-1 is public
    notice of a registered lien by a real human being who is the secured
    party, upon the STRAWMAN, the government-created, foreign non-
    registered corporation. With the STRAWMAN under our control,
    government has no access to the TDA and they also lose their go-
    between, their liaison, their connection to the real, living man and
    woman. No longer a subject, you become a free sovereign once again.
    You declare your independence!

    From now on, when presented with any "claim" or presentment from
    government, you will agree with it. This removes the "controversy."
    And you "accept it for value." By doing this you remove the negative
    claim against your account and become the "holder in due course" of
    the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn
    testimony of the presenter of the "claim" under penalty of perjury
    and request the account be properly adjusted.

    You don't have liability for your STRAWMAN. If you do commercial
    assignments, you have an asset called a Bill of Exchange which you
    can spend out. The birth certificate represents the body. The SSN
    represents the commercial account. Behind every birth certificate is
    a $1,000,000 bond which is pre-paid financing on any activity of the
    STRAWMAN. Some people have used their TDA to pay off their home or
    commercial mortgage, bank or student loans, tax liens, or credit card
    debt..

    When you own your STRAWMAN and anyone else charges against HIM, then
    that is commercial trespassing. If anyone goes after your STRAWMAN
    and wins any monetary award against the fiction of your STRAWMAN,
    then you (the real person/ secured party) get the first $1,000,000 of
    that because you have the first lien.

    It's all business, a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure
    is not complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to
    remember a few things, like: this is not a "legal" procedure - we're
    not playing People's Court. This is commerce, and we play by the
    rules of commerce. We accept the "claim", become the holder in due
    course, and challenge whether or not the presenter of the "claim"
    had/has the proper authority, the Order, to make the claim (debit our
    account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the Order (they
    never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly
    adjusted (the charge or claim goes away). Always Accept for Value,
    become the holder-in-due-course, and decide not to prosecute
    yourself! Are you getting used to this power yet?

    If they don't adjust the account a request is made for the
    bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were
    assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and
    the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. Since the claim has been
    accepted for value and is pre-paid, and our TDA is exempt from levy,
    the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax
    Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining
    who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account. If there is no
    record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we
    then request the individual tax estimates and individual tax returns
    to determine if there is delinquency.

    If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will
    then file a currency report on the amount claimed/ assessed against
    our account and begin the commercial process that will force them
    either to do what is required or lose everything they own!

    This is the power of contracts in commerce. A contract overrides the
    Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document other than
    another contract. No process of law—"color" of law under present
    codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.—can operate
    upon you; no agent and/or agency of government, including courts, can
    gain jurisdiction over you, without your consent! You do not exist
    within their fictional commercial venue.

    The Accepted for Value process gives you the ability to deal
    with "them," through the use of your transmitting utility/go-between,
    the STRAWMAN, and to hold them accountable in their own commercial
    world for any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a
    proper Order (and we know they're not in possession of such a
    document) they must leave us alone, or pay the consequences.

    In addition to your own freedom reclaimed, you will remove your
    collateral and participation from the frauds, manipulations, and
    extortion that have been perpetrated in your name. When enough people
    have reclaimed their birthright, we can also reclaim our
    constitutional republic that was intended to serve us in protecting
    our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.






    IF YOU ARE RECEIVING TOO MANY EMAILS from TruthShallPrevail,

    I suggest that you set your yahoo group setting to Digest Mode or Special Notices.


    Digest Mode places all the groups postings into 1 large email per day.


    Special Notices setting allows you to receive email from the moderator only.


    To change settings go here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TruthShallPrevail/join

    If you have a file or photo you want to share with the group,

    you may upload them by clicking here:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TruthShallPrevail/files (Files)
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TruthShallPrevail/lst (Photos)

    You can access links to great websites here:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TruthShallPrevail/links

    Links to free conspiracy/patriot/truth here:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Truth...dio_001105943802/Audio_Websites_001105944454/

    If you have any comments/suggestions/questions/links email: cheesemind@yahoo.com.
     
  4. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,984
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here is a gem from Patrick's site. http://econcurrent.com/devine/files...he Federal Government Bounty Hunter rev 1.doc

    The valid Federal Republic Government - Owner/Bounty Hunters
    vs
    The Foreign STATE Commercial “BAR” fraudulent Bounty Hunters

    operating as an UN-AUTHORIZED Foreign STATEForeign “Banking” Bounty Hunters.
    [70% of the Worlds “BAR” Bounty Hunters in a Commercial War with the United States People.]

    A Bounty Hunter (sometimes called a bounty killer) is a person who captures fugitives and criminals for a monetary reward (bounty). This occupation, seen almost exclusively in the United States, is also known as BAIL Enforcement Agent, BAIL Agent, Recovery Agent, BAIL Recovery Agent, or Fugitive Recovery Agent. While historically they existed in many parts of the world, BAIL BOND Agents are almost exclusively found in the United States and the Philippines; its former commonwealth, as the practice is illegal under the laws of most other countries.

    In 1872, the Supreme Court ruled that Bounty Hunters were a part of the U.S. Law Enforcement System with a decision inTaylor v. Tainto.

    THEREFORE, a Federal Government – Owner/Bounty Hunter has SUPERIOR Executive Authority based upon the Constitutional State Preambles of Ownership and as a U.S. Executive Law Enforcement Agent; per Article II section 2, as a valid Bounty Hunter of your Republic State’s Militia andit is also addressed in Article IV section 2. Basically the Federal Republic Government powers of the Owner/Bounty Hunter come from the following: the Republic Constitutions and the National Constitution, Article II section 2 and Article IV section 2; andthe 8th and 14th Amendments.

    As the Federal Republic Government Owner/Bounty Hunter, you have the Superior Standing over “Foreign Commercial BAR Bounty Hunters”, the Foreign Commercial Clerks of Court and the Administrative Foreign Commercial BAR Courts to claim an outright 10% of the Administrative BAIL BONDS, (known as the specific Commercial Contractor Surety Performance and Payment Bonds) when the validFederal Republic Government Owner/Bounty Hunter’s Bail Bond Claims” are initially presented, using the required SF forms.

    SF forms for the reclaiming your Surety Slave and the recovery of his Bailment Surety Bonds, which are addressed in the “Individual “UNITED STATES and STATE OF” Foreign Commercial Leasing/Service Non-Construction Contract Surety Performance and Payment Bonds, known as the real and true Surety BAIL BONDS”: SF-30, SF-1414, SF-1416, SF-1418 and also the SF-1047; plus other compensation ones.

    [Per the above as you are the ONLY valid Federal Republic Government – Owner/Bounty Hunter; you can claim a 10% on the spot as the Bounty Hunter and as the Owner, you can claim the FULL BAIL BONDS; Contracted Liquidated value.]

    SF forms for “UNITED STATES Bankrupt Corporate Indentured Foreign Commercial Leasing/Service Construction Contract Surety Performance and Payment Bonds, known as the real and true Surety BAIL BONDS”: SF-30, SF-28, SF-25, SF-25A and SF-95. Also the SF-1047; plus other compensation forms.

    Therefore as a Badged Republic State’s Militia and Bounty Hunter, you have the Right to carry and conceal unlicensed guns and self-protective equipment. You can ORDER the Sheriff or U.S. Marshals to Arrest any Foreign Commercial STATE Insurrection Agent and the seizure of any Foreign Commercial construction product or claim 10 to 50% of their Foreign STATE commercial Bail Bonds in the name of just compensation that is due the real Federal Republic Government and the Bounties are addressed in the Commercial Reward Postings, such as; Title 15 USC § 1 & 2.


    The Amer-i-can ExecutiveOwner’s” PREAMBLE:


    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    National Constitution - Article IV

    Section 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof. {A public Act is a Public Debt and therefore the “Full Faith and Credit” of the National Treasury was to make good the Debt; there was to be NO BANKER Prisons in this Nation.]

    Section 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

    A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another STATE, SHALL on Demand of the Executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime. [The valid Executive Owner / Executive Bounty Hunter.]

    NO PERSON held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, BUT SHALL BE DELIVERED up on CLAIM of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be DUE. [The valid Party is the Executive Owner / Executive Bounty Hunter.]

    Section 3. NEW STATES may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but NO NEW STATE shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress. {UNITED STATES and the STATE OF are NEW Commercial UNCONSTITUTIONAL Insurrection STATES.}

    The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any CLAIMS of the United States, OR of any particular State.

    Section 4. The United States SHALL GUARANTEE to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the EXECUTIVE (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.
     
  5. Ragnarok

    Ragnarok I'd rather be Midas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,478
    Likes Received:
    4,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The state national status is also being promoted by Anna vonReitz, it involves filing some papers with the county regarding the revocation of US corp citizenship and declaration of state national status. I don't know of anyone who has done this, it would be nice to have some input from someone who has.
    Anna's public articles can be found at annavonreitz.com if anyone is interested.

    R.
     

Share This Page