1. Stocks rebound yesterday to plug their losing streak, metals pull back
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Good Weds Morning! Gold is down 3 to 1252, while Silver is down 8 to 18.16. Crude is up 27 to 4864. The USD is up 9 to 9964.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 3/25/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1248.50-- UP 18.30 Silver $17.75-- UP 34 Oil $47.97-- DOWN 134 TICS USD $99.42 -- DOWN 66 tics

THE CIA MOVES TO INVALIDATE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS BY BLAMING RUSSIAN HACKING

Discussion in 'Politics Forum (Local/National/World)' started by Goldhedge, Dec 11, 2016.



  1. Ensoniq

    Ensoniq Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Free Marketeer
    Location:
    North Carolina
    image.jpeg
     
    Mr Paradise and Irons like this.
  2. andial

    andial Sir Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    7,239
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Enso that is great material, I'm stealing it!
     
    Ensoniq likes this.
  3. Aurumag

    Aurumag Seeker of Truth and Justice Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,541
    Likes Received:
    5,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Illuminator
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Since he likes little boys, I'm guessing that he is not hung.

    If Unca Walt were here, he would correct your grammar and tell you that Pedosta et al need to be hanged.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2016
  4. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,945
    Likes Received:
    27,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Remember! Government Propaganda Was Legalized To Be Used Against The American People Years Ago!


    NEW LAW 'ALLOWS OBAMA TO TAKE OVER ALL MEDIA'
    'Your government is acting in open, undeclared, but blatant treason'

    An online radio host is sounding the alarm over a brand-new law he claims grants the federal government massive new powers to saturate Americans with domestic propaganda at U.S. taxpayer expense.

    “This law allows the federal government to have sweeping power to push television, radio, newspaper and social-media propaganda onto the U.S. public,” warns Michael Evans of America’s Voice Now.

    “It removes protection for Americans from the ideological diarrhea that will pour forth from this administration like ejected vomit.”

    Evans is referring to the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, and Rep. Adam Smith, D- Wash., which was inserted into the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act.

    According to John Hudson of Foreign Policy Magazine, “For decades, a so-called anti-propaganda law prevented the U.S. government’s mammoth broadcasting arm from delivering programming to American audiences. But on July 2, that came silently to an end with the implementation of a new reform passed in January. The result: an unleashing of thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption in a reform initially criticized as a green light for U.S. domestic propaganda efforts.”

    The U.S. government has been in the business of broadcasting news and opinions into foreign countries through such famous outlets as the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.

    But now, critics believe millions of dollars will be spent by the government trying to influence citizens within its own borders.

    Evans says America has been protected from this over the years for good reason.

    “The types of information that we promulgate overseas to foreigners is disinformation. It is meant to confuse, distract, redirect. It is not meant to be an informative source of news,” he explained.


    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/new-law-allows-obama-to-take-over-all-media/#eCa200eBiw91FVse.99
     
    GOLDBRIX and Ensoniq like this.
  5. ErrosionOfAccord

    ErrosionOfAccord #1 Global Warmer Gold Chaser Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,393
    Likes Received:
    2,084
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Energy Extraction
    Location:
    Coal Country
    ^^^
    In and of it's self is despicable. I rarely believe ANYTHING anymore, it really is a weapon!
     
  6. SongSungAU

    SongSungAU Midas Member Midas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,460
    Likes Received:
    5,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    upload_2016-12-13_5-41-29.png

    When the WaPo posted last Friday's story about a "secret" CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, the readers of the Bezos-owned publication took it as gospel, despite, as we promptly noted, there being no evidence provided by the CIA, and as we learned today, the FBI openly resisting the CIA's assessment. It now appears that once again the WaPo may have been engaging in "partial fake news", as it did with its Nov. 24 story about "Russian propaganda fake media."

    According to Reuters, the so-called overseers of the U.S. intelligence community as it supervises the 17 agency-strong U.S. intelligence community, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), while not disputing the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations - something which would be unprecedented for the US spy industry and would telegraph just how partisan and broken the country's intelligence apparatus has become - has refused to endorse the CIA's assessment "because of a lack of conclusive evidence" that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

    As Reuters conveniently notes, the ODNI position could give Trump fresh ammunition to dispute the CIA assessment, which he rejected as "ridiculous" in weekend remarks, and press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks. The ODNI's position confirms that Trump was once again, you guessed it, right.

    "ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent," said one of the three U.S. officials.

    As reported earlier, the FBI, whose evidentiary standards require it to make cases that can stand up in court, likewise declined to accept the CIA's analysis - a deductive assessment of the available intelligence - for the same reason, the three officials said.

    The ODNI, headed by James Clapper, was established after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the recommendation of the commission that investigated the attacks. The commission, which identified major intelligence failures, recommended the office's creation to improve coordination among U.S. intelligence agencies.

    As a reminder, the first hint that the US would scapegoat Russia for an "unexpected election outcome" took place on October 7, when the U.S. government formally accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against American political organizations ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election. Back then, president Barack Obama has said he warned Russian President Vladimir Putin about consequences for the attacks. Reports of the assessment by the CIA, which has not publicly disclosed its findings, have prompted congressional leaders to call for an investigation.

    The narrative escalated rapidly last week, when outgoing president Obama ordered intelligence agencies to review the cyber attacks and foreign intervention in the presidential election and to deliver a report before he turns power over to Trump on Jan. 20.

    So how did the CIA come to its conclusion?

    According to Reuters, the agency assessed after the election that the attacks on political organizations were aimed at swaying the vote for Trump because the targeting of Republican organizations diminished toward the end of the summer and focused on Democratic groups, a senior U.S. official told Reuters on Friday. Moreover, only materials filched from Democratic groups - such as emails stolen from John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chairman - were made public via WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization, and other outlets, U.S. officials said.

    The CIA conclusion - one of induction and no supporting evidence - was a "judgment based on the fact that Russian entities hacked both Democrats and Republicans and only the Democratic information was leaked," one of the three officials said on Monday. "(It was) a thin reed upon which to base an analytical judgment," the official added.

    Earlier Monday, Senator John McCain said on Monday also confronted the CIA's assessment, saying there was "no information" that Russian hacking of American political organizations was aimed at swaying the outcome of the election. "It's obvious that the Russians hacked into our campaigns," McCain said. "But there is no information that they were intending to affect the outcome of our election and that's why we need a congressional investigation," he told Reuters.

    McCain also questioned an assertion made on Sunday by RNC Chair Reince Priebus, who said that there were no hacks of computers belonging to Republican organizations. "Actually, because Mr. Priebus said that doesn't mean it's true," said McCain. "We need a thorough investigation of it, whether both (Democratic and Republican organizations) were hacked into, what the Russian intentions were. We cannot draw a conclusion yet. That's why we need a thorough investigation."

    Well, just because HIllary said that, it did make it true, so perhaps Reince is right as well?

    Meanwhile, in an angry letter sent to ODNI chief Clapper on Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said he was “dismayed” that the top U.S. intelligence official had not informed the panel of the CIA’s analysis and the difference between its judgment and the FBI’s assessment. Noting that Clapper in November testified that intelligence agencies lacked strong evidence linking Russian cyber attacks to the WikiLeaks disclosures, Nunes asked that Clapper, together with CIA and FBI counterparts, brief the panel by Friday on the latest intelligence assessment of Russian hacking during the election campaign.

    We, for one, can't wait to hear his testimony - under oath - why in the span of one month so much has changed, and who precisely prompted the CIA to "infer" that Russia is responsible for Hillary Clinton's loss. Or maybe we will just have to wait for Wikileaks, pardon Russia, to hack Podesta's email account for that first?



    source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-russian-hacking-assessment-due-lack-evidence
     
  7. Ensoniq

    Ensoniq Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Free Marketeer
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Something tells me the herd needs thinning at the CIA
     
    solarion, andial and the_shootist like this.
  8. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    It needs thinning all up and down each and every agency of government!
     
  9. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FWIW..................

    Is The Deep State At War... With Itself?

    [​IMG]
    by Tyler Durden
    Dec 13, 2016 8:22 AM

    Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

    This is a blatantly politicized "report" that is not supported by any evidence, nor is it supported by the other 16 intelligence agencies.

    The recent pronouncement by the C.I.A. that Russian hackers intervened in the U.S. presidential election doesn't pass the sniff test--on multiple levels. Let's consider the story on the most basic levels.

    1. If the report is so "secret," why is it dominating the news flow?

    2. Why was the "secret report" released now?

    3. What actual forensic evidence is there of intervention? Were voting machines tampered with? Or is this "secret report" just another dose of fact-free "fake news" like The Washington Post's list of 200 "Russian propaganda" websites?

    4. The report claims the entire U.S. intelligence community is in agreement on the "proof of Russian intervention on behalf of Trump" story, but then there's this:

    "The C.I.A. presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered."

    Given that the N.S.A. (National Security Agency) was so secret that its existence was denied for decades, do you really think the NSA is going to go public if it disagrees with the C.I.A.?

    Given the structure of the Deep State and the intelligence community, "minor disagreements" could well mean complete, total disavowal of the C.I.A.'s report.

    That this is the reality is suggested by the F.B.I.'s denunciation of the report's evidence-free, sweeping conclusion:

    FBI Disputes CIA's "Fuzzy And Ambiguous" Claims That Russia Sought To Influence Presidential Election

    5. The supposed interventions clearly fall under the purview of the NSA. So why is the C.I.A. going public in what is clearly a politicized report intended to influence the public via massive, sustained coverage in the mainstream media?

    6. Notice the double standard: so when the U.S. attempts to influence public opinion in other nations, it's OK, but when other nations pursue the same goal, it's not OK?

    7. What are we to make of the sustained campaign to elevate "Russian hackers and propaganda" from signal noise to the deciding factor in the U.S. election?

    8. Russian hacking and attempts to influence American public opinion are not new. The intelligence agencies tasked with protecting American cyberspace have long identified state-sponsored hacking from Russia and China as major threats. So why, all of a sudden, are we being told the Russians successfully influenced a U.S. election?

    What changed? What new capabilities did they develop?

    9. And most importantly, what evidence is there that Russian efforts affected the election? Were digital fingerprints found on voting machine records? Were payments to American media employees uncovered?

    Shouldn't statements purported to be "fact" or the "truth" be substantiated beyond "trust us, an agency with a long history of failed intelligence, misinformation and illegal over-reach"?

    10. Doesn't it raise alarms that such a momentous accusation is totally devoid of evidence? If you're going public with the conclusion, you have to go public with at least some of the evidence.

    Here's the media blitz and some skeptical response:

    CIA: Russia intervened to help Trump win

    Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

    Former UK Ambassador Blasts "CIA's Blatant Lies", Shows "A Little Simple Logic Destroys Their Claims"

    Longtime readers know I have proposed a major divide in the Deep State--the elements of the federal government which don't change regardless of who is in elected office. This includes the intelligence community, the Pentagon, the diplomatic and trade infrastructure, Research and Revelopment, and America's own organs of media "framing" and "placement."

    Is the Deep State Fracturing into Disunity? (March 14, 2014)

    More recently, I wondered if the more progressive elements of the Deep State recognized the dangers to U.S. security posed by the neocons and their candidate, Hillary Clinton, and had decided to undermine her candidacy:

    Could the Deep State Be Sabotaging Hillary? (August 8, 2016)

    In other words, it's not the Russians who sabotaged Hillary--it's America's own Deep State that undermined her coronation. It wasn't a matter of personalities; it was much more profound than that. It was about the risks posed by the neocon strategies and policies, and just as importantly, the politicization of the intelligence network.

    And this is precisely what we discern in the C.I.A.'s unprecedented and quite frankly, absurd "secret report:" a blatantly politicized "report" that is not supported by any evidence, nor is it supported by the other 16 intelligence agencies. (Silence doesn't mean approval in this sphere.)

    [​IMG]

    We can now discern the warring camps of the Deep State more clearly. On the one side is the C.I.A., the mainstream media, and the civilians who have feasted on wealth and power from their participation in the neocon's Global Project.

    On the other side is the Defense Department's own intelligence agencies (D.I.A. et al.), the N.S.A., the F.B.I. and at least a few well-placed civilians who recognize the neocon agenda as a clear and present danger to the security of the nation.

    From this perspective, the C.I.A.'s rash, evidence-free "report" is a rear-guard political action against the winning faction of the Deep State. The Deep State elements that profited from the neocon agenda were confident that Hillary's victory would guarantee another eight years of globalist intervention. Her loss means they are now on the defensive, and like a cornered, enraged beast, they are lashing out with whatever they have in hand.

    This goes a long way in explaining the C.I.A's release of a painfully threadbare and politicized "report."

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-13/deep-state-war-itself
     
    madhu likes this.
  10. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Intelligence Officer Who Personally Met the Democratic Email Leaker Confirms Leaker Is with AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE Services

    [​IMG]
    by George Washington
    Dec 12, 2016 5:33 PM

    The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of Dundee, Craig Murray, wrote yesterday:

    As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.

    ***

    I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

    In other words, Murray – a close friend of Julian Assange – says he knows for a fact that there were no hacks at all … instead, an American insider leaked the information to Wikileaks.

    Today, Murray writes:

    If you set up the super surveillance state, hoovering up all the internet traffic of pretty well everybody, that is not just going to affect the ordinary people whom the elite despise. There is also going to be an awful lot of traffic intercepted from sleazy members of the elite connected to even the most senior politicians, revealing all their corruption and idiosyncracies. From people like John Podesta, to take an entirely random example. And once the super surveillance state has intercepted and stored all that highly incriminating material, you never know if some decent human being, some genuine patriot, from within the security services is going to feel compelled to turn whistleblower.

    Than they might turn for help to, to take another entirely random example, Julian Assange.

    This confirms what the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – previously said: the leaker was from U.S. intelligence services. And see this.

    And Murray confirmed to Washington's Blog by email that Binney "was on the mark." And see this.

    In other words, Russia did not hack the Democratic party emails. Instead, an American intelligence whistleblower leaked them.

    It wouldn't be the first time.

    Update: David Swanson interviewed Murray today, and obtained additional information. Specifically, Murray told Swanson that: (1) there were two American leakers ... one for the emails of the Democratic National Committee and one for the emails of top Clinton aide John Podesta; (2) Murray met one of those leakers; and (3) both leakers are American insiders with the NSA and/or the DNC, with no known connections to Russia.

    And see this.

    Postscript: As we've pointed out for years, the NSA is collecting all digital communications, including emails, in America.

    The NSA then shares this information with numerous other agencies, including the FBI, DEA, etc.

    We've noted that the NSA’s big data collection itself creates an easy mark for hackers. Remember, the Pentagon itself sees the collection of “big data” as a “national security threat” … but the NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers.

    And we've documented that the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.

    It sounds like this witches brew of bad policy is what led to the Democratic email leaks from an insider in the intelligence services.

    But if anyone wants to try to prove Murray and Binney wrong, it should be easy to check.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-democratic-email-leaker-confirms-he-was-amer
     
    Ensoniq likes this.
  11. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Newt Gingrich: Mainsteam Media Make Up Junk Because They Can't Cover Real News
    iBankCoin.com



    Published on Dec 12, 2016
     
    viking likes this.
  12. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CIA's claim that Russia hacked to hand Trump victory is REJECTED by Director of National Intelligence in blow to Democrats' attack on president-elect
    • The Office of the Director of National Intelligence oversees the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community - including the CIA and FBI
    • Three ODNI sources have said the agency does not back the CIA assessment that Russia conducted hacks to help Donald Trump win the presidency
    • Blow to CIA theory Democrats loved to tout comes on top of FBI not supporting the conclusion either
    • Democrats are trying to delegitimize Trump's victory with claims he benefited from hacking by Putin
    • Clinton's campaign chairman came back from the dead on Monday to bolster the claims
    • Trump has called idea that Russia hacked for his benefit 'ridiculous' and his team compared it to CIA belief Iraq had weapons of mass destruction


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027344/Top-U-S-spy-agency-not-embraced-CIA-assessment-Russia-hacking-sources.html#ixzz4SjI9joUc
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
    Ensoniq likes this.
  13. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why has the CIA changed its tune? Chairman of House intelligence committee says latest statements on Russian 'election hack' conflict with earlier briefings
    • Congressman Devin Nunes, a Republican, has written a letter to James Clapper
    • Clapper, 75, was appointed in 2010 and submitted his resignation last month
    • Nunes has demanded he explain contradictions by CIA over Russian hacking
    • A secret CIA report said the Kremlin hacked emails to help Trump win election
    • Senators John McCain , Jack Reed, Lindsay Graham and Chuck Schumer have demanded a bipartisan investigation into the hacking


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027950/Clapper-s-changed-tune-Chairman-House-intelligence-committee-says-CIA-s-latest-statements-Russian-election-hack-conflict-earlier-briefings.html#ixzz4SjIfiUEd
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
    andial likes this.
  14. andial

    andial Sir Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    7,239
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's the leaders of the scumbags list right there folks.
     
  15. Aurumag

    Aurumag Seeker of Truth and Justice Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    6,541
    Likes Received:
    5,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Illuminator
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Good clue as to who the REAL enemies are^

    CIA = CFR = NWO

    Not only un-Constitutional but blatantly anti-liberty, and when it comes to fake news, they have full control of MSM propaganda.

    The CIA takes up a lot of space in the D.C. swamp.
     
    andial likes this.
  16. southfork

    southfork Mother Lode Found Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    12,669
    Likes Received:
    9,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dems throwing everything they got against the wall hoping something sticks.

    Dems are prerunning for
     
  17. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    Yeah but the MSM is getting more and more irrelevant by the day
     
    chrisflhtc, mtnman and andial like this.
  18. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now Obama slaps Trump for inviting the Russians to hack Hillary's emails to prove his own 'conspiracy theories' - and blames voters for being 'obsessed' with Wikileaks dumps
    • Trump said Sunday 'no one really knows' who was behind the hacks and claimed the opposing party was looking for an 'excuse' for Hillary Clinton's electoral loss
    • Obama smacked Trump on Monday for urging the Kremlin to 'hack Hillary's emails so that we can...confirm our conspiracy theories'
    • Obama's spokesman Josh Earnest also ripped Trump for encouraging cyber espionage - 'He called on Russia to attack Secretary Clinton,' he said.
    • Trump said at a July rally: 'Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing'
    • Obama said in a Daily Show interview that he still doesn't understand why illegally obtained emails from Democratic officials received more attention than the fact that Russia interrupted a U.S. election


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4029116/Now-Obama-slaps-Trump-inviting-Russians-hack-Hillary-s-emails-prove-conspiracy-theories-shames-public-obsessed-Wikileaks-dumps.html#ixzz4SkgBun84
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
  19. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    These people (starting from Obama on down) are like 10 year old brats who constantly whine and cry. Beware the next few weeks. Just like typical 10 year olds, they will need to be stopped otherwise they just keep misbehaving and pushing the envelope!
     
  20. Ensoniq

    Ensoniq Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Free Marketeer
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Didn't Obama get caught manipulating the Israeli,election? I seem to remember he was using taxpayer funds to try to get Bibi to lose
     
    D-FENZ likes this.
  21. GOLDBRIX

    GOLDBRIX God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh Site Supporter Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,119
    Likes Received:
    3,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    By his KNUT SACK.

    Funny how the "BARRY" CIA could not find any Russian Hacking into the Clit-ton Foundation BUT BARRY's CIA "believes" the Russians "hacked" the election for TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP.

    Still playing the "YES MEN" up to the very end. "Yes'em Master Barry".
     
    TAEZZAR and Ensoniq like this.
  22. mayhem

    mayhem A Different Perspective Silver Miner Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    2,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Dixie
    All these people have a lot to loose if Trump is sworn in. Barry no doubt tried to smooth talk Don when they met, and got no where. They all know they will be indicted, all of them and they will be found guilty of numerous crimes. That is why they absolutely can not allow Trump into the white hut.
     
    TAEZZAR and Goldhedge like this.
  23. TAEZZAR

    TAEZZAR LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    9,243
    Likes Received:
    13,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    The Real Truth Behind the CIA Report of Russian Hacking Electing Trump

    http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the...cia-report-of-russian-hacking-electing-trump/


    WeAreChange's Luke Rudkowski breaks down the lies most vile emanating from the CIA about
    Russian hackers electing president Donald Trump. The Mainstream Media has been carpet bombing
    American living rooms over the past week with this FAKE NEWS coming from the professional lie
    agency. Ironically, for the past 70 years, the CIA has used propaganda against foreign
    nations to effect regime change and to install right wing dictators around the globe. Now they're
    using it to prevent a duly-elected right wing President of the US from taking office. Blue is the new Red.

    Could this be happening because Obama legalized US Government propaganda to be wielded against
    US Citizens, when he signed the 2012 NDAA budget?

    Meanwhile, the 2017 NDAA budget was just passed, which includes the Portman-Murphy Counter-
    Propaganda Bill
    passed by both houses of Congress, which calls for a $160M yearly budget from the
    Pentagon to block "Russian" and other foreign propaganda from entering the US, as well as to pay
    bloggers like me to produce pro-US Government propaganda, lest we resist and watch our Internet traffic
    get filtered to a trickle, are forced to close shop and stock shelves at Wal-Mart. The American gulag is
    within driving distance.

    The insanity of the election season hasn't skipped a beat in the 5 weeks since the Election was called.
    The flailing vote recount effort [allegedly] mounted by Jill Stein, the cacaphonous histrionics of "comedienne"/
    Deep State troll, Samantha Bee and virtually everyone else on the idiot box, compounded by the baseless,
    politically-motivated claims of the CIA and the reports of death threats being made to Electoral College voters
    if they vote for Trump, is all part of the lead-up to next Monday, December 19th, when the Electoral College formally
    casts their votes for the new President of the US.

    On the upside, James Clapper's Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which supervises the work of
    all 17 of the US' intelligence agencies has stated that the CIA's claim that Russia is behind the DNC and Podesta
    leaks to swing election to Donald Trump
    are unproven and the FBI agrees.

    In addition, former UK Ambassador to Russia, Craig Murray, a close friend of Julian Assange, has confirmed that he
    knows the identity of the person who leaked the DNC and Podesta leaks to WikiLeaks.
    not Russian and has no connection to
    the Russian government - on the contrary, he is a Washington insider.
     
    searcher and GOLDBRIX like this.
  24. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
    • Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
    • He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
    • The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
    • Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
    • 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
    • Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to Wikileaks


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html#ixzz4SqgWWgX3
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
  25. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,945
    Likes Received:
    27,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Don't look here! LOOK! OVER THERE!
     
  26. Ensoniq

    Ensoniq Midas Member Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    7,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Free Marketeer
    Location:
    North Carolina
    image.jpeg
     
    GOLDBRIX and Goldhedge like this.
  27. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FWIW...................

    Revealed: Putin 'personally ordered the US election hack' while the White House claims Trump knew all about Russian interference
    • US intelligence officials think Vladimir Putin was personally involved in efforts to meddle in the election, it has been reported
    • New intelligence reveals Putin controlled how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and used, two senior officials told NBC News
    • President-elect Donald Trump knew Russia was interfering in the US presidential election, the White House suggested this week
    • The CIA has concluded with 'high confidence' that Russia sought to influence the U.S. election on behalf of Trump
    • Trump has rejected the CIA's conclusion that Russia tried to interfere
    • Republican senator Lindsey Graham said Russian hackers accessed his campaign email account


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4035444/White-House-accuses-Trump-knowing-Russia-interfering-election-hurting-Hillary-Clinton-s-campaign-sources-claim-Russian-president-Vladimir-Putin-DIRECT-hand-it.html#ixzz4Stp7vyjG
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
  28. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CIA officials REFUSE to brief Congress on the truth about Russian hacking claims - and are rebuked by GOP congressman for 'disgraceful' move
    • The House Intelligence Committee had planned a Thursday briefing with CIA officials about Russian-backed hacking in the U.S. election
    • The CIA declined to provide a briefer, citing its ongoing work on the review President Obama has requested on the topic
    • Panel chairman is 'deeply concerned' about potential manipulation of intelligence for 'political purposes'
    • Representative Peter King of Long Island called it 'absolutely disgraceful' that the CIA won't come in, and asked whether there was a 'disinformation campaign' going on
    • The Agency says it stands 'ready to brief' once the Obama review 'is complete'


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4037220/CIA-officials-REFUSE-brief-Congress-truth-Russian-hacking-claims-rebuked-GOP-congressman-disgraceful-move.html#ixzz4SvMMwXzS
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
    mayhem likes this.
  29. andial

    andial Sir Midas Member Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,818
    Likes Received:
    7,239
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This was the hacking that exposed cliton getting questions to the debate beforehand from Brazile and the Soros directed attacks on Trump supporters at the chicago rally nobody is repeating that in the media or republican fags.
     
  30. mayhem

    mayhem A Different Perspective Silver Miner Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    2,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Dixie
    There was no hack, and that's why the CIA won't brief congress. Just watched Peter King abuse Maygan the dyke when she tried to cut him off.

    Strictly the CIA who always has worked for the Bush/Clinton/Obomber clique.
     
    andial, Goldhedge and the_shootist like this.
  31. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    I never thought I'd see this amount of assfoolery in my lifetime....and I fear it's only beginning.
     
    mayhem likes this.
  32. goldielox1

    goldielox1 Seeker Seeker

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Got it. So Russia was secretly scheming to trick the American people to elect a President that would seek to put America first, and attempt to make America a great country again by lowering taxes, keeping factories and jobs in America, increasing domestic energy production, etc.

    Those sneaky devils! We won't stand for that! To Arms!
     
    Merlin, mayhem and GOLDBRIX like this.
  33. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,945
    Likes Received:
    27,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    IMG_0942.JPG

    IMG_0944.JPG
     
    JayDubya, Joe King, Merlin and 2 others like this.
  34. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,945
    Likes Received:
    27,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    and another thing....



    Screen Shot 2016-12-16 at 12.22.40 AM.png
     
    madhu likes this.
  35. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    25,945
    Likes Received:
    27,795
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    Lynch: We Didn't See Any Techincal Interference In The Election From The Russians

     
  36. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Russia over hacking scandal as White House insider claims he ignored the issue during the election because he thought Clinton would win
    • Barack Obama said the US will take action against Russia for what the intelligence community says was hacking - but he didn't say what action
    • He said the US will respond to Russia at a 'time and place of our choosing'
    • NBC News said the president confronted Putin in September over the hacking while at a summit in China
    • Officials point out that intelligence on the hacking was released - but the media was more focused on Trump's crude sexual bragging tape
    • Trump may be coming around to believe that Russia did hack private emails in an effort to throw the election his way


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4039512/Obama-vows-retaliate-against-Russia-hacking-scandal-report-claims-ignored-warnings-election-thought-Clinton-win.html#ixzz4T0GPzsn8
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
  37. GOLDBRIX

    GOLDBRIX God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh Site Supporter Platinum Bling

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,119
    Likes Received:
    3,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    DNC, HITLARY, and B.O. are using the Harry Reid Tactic - Tell a LIE, tell their lap dog MSM aka LameStreamMedia to run with it, and get away with it.



    "He didn't win did he". Harry Reid - 1:25 mark
     
    andial likes this.
  38. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    There's so much fail in that article. When you read it notice the assumption that Trump is starting to 'come around' on the Russian hacking. I don't see him coming around at all. The article is twisting and turning statements to fit that narrative.

    Media disgusts me to the core!
     
  39. the_shootist

    the_shootist I self identify as a black '69 Camaro Midas Member Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    10,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Architect
    Location:
    Cow Hampshire
    ...and Americans are thinking about using the USMC tactic for dealing with the enemy (the enemy being the treasonous politicians in Washington). Kill 'em all and let God sort them out!
     
    GOLDBRIX likes this.
  40. searcher

    searcher Mother Lode Found Site Supporter ++ Mother Lode

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    103,716
    Likes Received:
    34,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Prove it or shut up, Russia tells CIA: Putin's spokesman accuses US of being 'extremely scurrilous' over hacking allegations
    • Obama yesterday warned that the United States would take action
    • Putin has been accused of being involved in cyber attacks during the US election
    • During a visit to Japan, the Kremlin said the accusation were 'scurrilous'


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4040248/Kremlin-slams-extremely-scurrilous-US-hacking-accusations.html#ixzz4T1N4jAsZ
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
     
    Joe King, mayhem and andial like this.

Share This Page