1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

The Possible Las Vegas Motive That Only Mark Steyn Is Talking About

Discussion in 'Coffee Shack (Daily News/Economy)' started by Goldhedge, Oct 8, 2017.



  1. Goldhedge

    Goldhedge Modal Operator/Moderator Site Mgr Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27,900
    Likes Received:
    31,364
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Tech
    The Possible Las Vegas Motive That Only Mark Steyn Is Talking About
    London think tank member tries to come up with a motive, lands on "gun control."
    [​IMG]
    Photo by Thomas Cooper/Getty Images

    ByTYLER DAHNKE
    @tylerdahnke
    October 8, 2017


    On Friday, Las Vegas undersheriff Kevin C. McMahill told the media that the motive underlying Stephen Paddock’s monstrous rampage remains a mystery. It’s truly bizarre that almost a week after the shooting we have no insight into what set Paddock off. Generally speaking, mass murderers kill in order to send a message, or because they’re seriously mentally ill.

    Dylann Roof was a racist who killed to strike fear into the hearts of African Americans; Timothy McVeigh considered himself a revolutionary, and lashed out at “tyrannical government” over the Waco siege; Adam Lanza was autistic, obsessive-compulsive, likely schizophrenic, and became obsessed with school shootings.

    Paddock, though clearly morally empty and repulsive, retained enough lucidity to craft his deadly scenario with meticulous precision. He selected a specific floor and room to provide maximum shooting advantage, smuggled guns and ammunition into the hotel undetected, utilized specific modifications on his weapons to increase devastation, and even planted cameras outside the room so that he could see the police coming for him. Mark Steyn pointed out that, in many ways, Paddock’s actions more closely resembled those of a professional hitman than those of his mass-shooting predecessors. The careful planning suggests Paddock had some form of motive.

    So if Paddock wasn’t a paranoid schizophrenic facing a complete mental break, what message was he trying to send? We know now that he didn’t leave a note; he didn’t leave revealing internet search histories; he didn’t turn himself over to the police so he could enjoy his infamy. Is it possible that he simply had no motive or message? Perhaps, but alternatively, author Mark Steyn shared a theory on Friday sent to him by a reader whom he describes as a "gentleman at a London think tank." The reader’s theory, which is worth reading in its entirety, even if just as a thought experiment, arrives at a motive that seems to check nearly every box.

    It must be underscored, however, that there is no hard evidence whatsoever that this was indeed Paddock's motive. What follows is purely speculative on the self-described think-tank member's part.

    The emailer's theory is essentially one of inception. What has everyone been talking about non-stop since Monday morning? Gun control. And why are we talking about gun control? Because the sheer number of guns and ammunition Paddock sneaked into room 135 on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel is astounding. As a result, the story immediately focused on the guns: Were they automatic? What kind of guns were they? How were they modified? Where did he get them from?

    The other distractions and storylines that typically arise weren’t available in this shooting. It was a white shooter, going after mostly white people at a country music concert. That means, as Steyn points out, no shifting narratives toward white-supremacy to draw attention away from the guns. Paddock seemingly had no political or religious affiliations; it wasn’t triggered by a domestic dispute, nor was it work related; it doesn’t appear to be the result of a psychotic break. All of this leaves nothing but the firearm narrative on the table.

    Police found 47 guns between the killer’s hotel room and two of his homes. Twenty-three were with him in his room in the Mandalay Bay Hotel. And by all accounts, a large quantity of ammunition was still left in the hotel room following the massacre. Steyn’s reader notes Paddock “spent days filling his hotel room with more weapons and ammunition than he could ever conceivably use along with an array of advanced modifications and accessories." Which begs the question: Why did he spend energy and time sneaking all those firearms into the hotel knowing that when bullets started flying, he wouldn’t get the chance to use even half of what he had on hand?

    The writer of the email quoted in Steyn’s article believes the answer to motive is “publicity." Specifically, that “this man [Paddock] wished to telegraph to America in graphic form the hard irrefutable evidence that guns and gun ownership, and the ease of gun purchase in America are an evil and must be controlled. On that hypothesis, everything now makes sense."

    There’s no hard evidence whatsoever to support this theory, of course, but one must admit, with the meager information we currently have at hand, it makes some sense. Steyn’s reader believes that Paddock did leave a message, “it only happens to be implicit instead of explicit. That message is ‘guns.’ And that message is being trawled over every minute of every day on every network in America."

    Last week, Ben Shapiro wrote an article explaining Roy Baumeister’s classifications of evil in the world. It was a challenge lumping Paddock into one of the four types of evil, which made him even more unusual. If it is the case, however, that Paddock believed he was killing for “righteous” ends, this is clearly sinister idealism at work.

    If Paddock’s goal was to shock the U.S. into banning guns, or passing strict gun control, as the think tank member suggests, it means the bombshell answer explaining what drove a man to murder so many innocents is never coming. If it’s true, it means that Paddock planted the seed of an idea — that gun control is necessary — that is already tearing through the United States like a cancer. It’s an interesting theory, but I hope that it’s wrong. Stephen Paddock has devastated too many lives already. The idea of his murderous actions posthumously influencing our world more than they already have is hard to stomach.
     
    michael59 likes this.
  2. Buck

    Buck Fabian Society Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,283
    Likes Received:
    1,730
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Any idea to take advantage of any part of this tragedy to decree more safety for the lot of us would only come at the behest of one of our "leaders" actively making it so
    Riding this idiots carcass is what they would use to push it though

    But that's not really leader-like

    I don't know about any motive, reason or otherwise for this idiot to do what he did
    Cause and effect don't always correlate when we only have our bias', personal or otherwise to use as a basis to "read another man's mind"
    This guy was an individual, a real lone wolf? IDK, but it looks that way

    It's nearly a time where it'll be easier to "shut it all down" than it was for the shooter to take out 600 people

    With electricity, there's not much need to shed any blood to spread some pain
    or any message
    the blood spill would just be incidental, not intended
    guns or not, this is only going to continue in a competition type style

    my guess is color won't matter
    gender will, mostly males
    bigger dick theory
     
  3. Someone_else

    Someone_else Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    1,839
    Likes Received:
    2,059
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NO. This is a stupid hypothesis. It does NOT make sense of the story. On the list of possibilities, it would be well below "controlled by aliens."
     
  4. ToBeSelfEvident

    ToBeSelfEvident Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    1,088
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It makes no sense to claim Paddock wanted to craft this anti-gun message and punctuate it by taking his own life. It makes plenty of sense to say Paddock was a patsy used by the Deep State to promote gun control.
     
    Someone_else likes this.

Share This Page