1. Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
    Dismiss Notice
  2. There are no markets
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Week of 6/24/2017 Closing prices & Chg Over Last Wk---- Gold $1256.40 Silver $16.64 Oil $43.01 USD $96.94
  4. "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"
    Dismiss Notice

U.S.Code Title 2 Chapter 6 Sec. 193..... Privilege of witnesses

Discussion in 'U.S. Constitution & Law' started by TRYNEIN, Nov 9, 2017.



  1. TRYNEIN

    TRYNEIN Gold Member Gold Chaser

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,710
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    third cove on the right
    Congress has ALL the power in Washington

    ...........................................................................................................................................................

    U.S. CODE
    TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
    CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
    Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses

    No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”

    Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”

    Congress can Remove the President
    Congress can remove the head of every executive agency
    Congress can remove ALL of their employees
    Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
    Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
    Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
    Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
    CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
    Congress can declare WAR

    No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!

    CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!

    Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)

    If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.

    Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.

    Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.

    Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.

    Some references

    [1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html

    [2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html

    [3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit

    [4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html

    [5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf

    [6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/...ctices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/

    In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.

    In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
     
    michael59 likes this.
  2. Bigjon

    Bigjon Silver Member Silver Miner Site Supporter ++

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    1,847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The United States is just the District of Criminals and a few military bases and some federal court buildings.
    The rest belongs to the respective State's like Minnesota, Iowa etc.

    ====================================

    http://freeinhabitant.info/counseling-fees/counsel-time-available-by-paul-john-hansen.htm

    Paul is looking for volunteers for an on-line common law jury.

    http://freeinhabitant.info/common-law-court-of-record/trial-by-jury-jurors-needed-common-law.htm

    Paul is trying to bring back common law courts, which is our right.

    http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-39904/TS-1195746.mp3

    I just listened to this. Hansen uses volunteers from across America to implement common law. According to Hansen no U.S. Court can review any 7th article court, the only court that can be used to counter one common law court is another common law court.

    The essential fraud that the United States is pulling off is to use their court system against people who never have been U. S. Citizens. The gov is a military organization and the courts have no jurisdiction on land not owned by the U.S.


    When you force the IRS to assess you, an agent has to sign that assessment and that makes him liable for damages. If you have lost your property there are legal procedures, that they never follow and you can usually find the evidence that they made up the evidence and then you can get your property back plus sue the agents for fraud.

    Police only have jurisdiction, over land owned by the U.S., What they are doing now is a travesty, that we the people have to put a stop to.


    http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=39904&cmd=tc

    http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-39904/TS-1211778.mp3

    In my opinion, this program is a very good one to listen to.



    There are some more programs where Paul appeared, but I have not listened to them.


    http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-39904/TS-1200802.mp3
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017

Share This Page