• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

2020 US Election thread

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,815
Likes
95,930
Location
Earth
The more and more I find out I think the rope is letting them off easy. I am starting to like the North Korean idea of a firing squad with an anti aircraft battery.
Nah, over much to quick. I want to see them desperately twitching trying to breathe knowing that those are their last moments. It should be on pay per view
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,478
Likes
21,501

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,815
Likes
95,930
Location
Earth
View attachment 189893
https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/sidney-powell-photos-vote-manipulation-real-time/



Sidney Powell: Evidence of vote-fraud 'conspiracy' to be published

Trump lawyer says documents will be posted online as soon as this weekend
Up until the last presser I would have been saying the same thing I'd always said....don't tell us, show us. Now after all I saw and heard during that 90 minutes I'm confident that these people are much more than talk and what they say, they mean!
 
Last edited:

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
Voting Works digs



Sidney tweeted an article from thenation.com that covers the Lin Wood lawsuit, as well as Voting Works, the Soros non-profit Georgia legislature put in charge of auditing.

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1330070138855550982
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/georgia-recount/tnamp/
https://archive.fo/7glA4
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/voting-works/
https://archive.is/7Egpy

1605970426913.png

From their site:

https://voting.works/

VotingWorks is a non-partisan non-profit building a secure, affordable, and simple voting system. Our vote-by-mail solution lets you scale vote-by-mail quickly and affordably. Our risk-limiting audit software ensures votes cast on any paper-based system are correctly tabulated. Our voting machine creates paper ballots that voters can directly verify. Our source code is available on GitHub.

Anons, if this isn't a vote-rigging system in plain sight, then I don't know what is. What they do show of their voting machines suggests they are wirelessly connected touch screen stations. They claim it prints paper ballots that can be verified by physical audit, but in doing so they also claim their formula requires far less sample ballots to be audited to confirm the results. I haven't studied it enough to fully understand how it's being done, but it's already shady AF.

Not only do they make the machines and the software, but they also control the auditing. They provide the appearance of randomized auditing of paper ballots, but they control of the scope and selection of ballots that are chosen, that I'm sure isn't corrupted at all. Seems to me a system like this could easily be manipulated to insure the ballots targeted "randomly" will pass the audit, while insuring the ballots that would not pass an audit are blacklisted from the selection pool.

This provides the necessary reinforcement to the "no evidence of voter fraud" narrative from all their trusted non-profit buddies doing fact-checking for fake news and big tech. According to the map on their home page, Voting Works claims to be operating in these states:

California
Mississippi
Georgia
Illinois
Michigan
Kentucky
Virginia
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
Massachusetts
New Hampshire

And would you look at that, they even partnered with DHS to pilot their auditing system in 2020 Election in the battleground states! And who is singing their praises in 2019 for their participation in the 2020 election? Why it's none other than fired former CISA Director Chris Krebs of course!

https://fcw.com/articles/2019/11/22/cisa-arlo-johnson.aspx

1605970523718.png
1605970530453.png
 

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
1605970767996.png

https://twitter.com/alfo13676851/status/1329957798776614912

alf0numeric

@alfo13676851

glitch aka unexpected moniotor in real time



The external network is connected to the Serbian IP address, the network that provides support is SBB, which is owned by Petraeus, the former head of the CIA, and Soros. Minority partners in SBB are Solak and Djilas. So don't shit, but pack up too.



https://twitter.com/acastef53/status/1326730767276314626

https://twitter.com/acastef53/status/1326733288501895168

https://twitter.com/acastef53/status/1326733295187599362

Voting machines in Antrim and Wayne counties in Michigan are connected to the Internet on November 3. at 11 pm, and thousands of Trump's votes were transferred from Serbia to Biden.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1326510526420094976.html
 

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
https://www.teaparty.org/busted-fbi-agents-arrest-second-cincinnati-democrat-on-federal-corruption-charges-459264/



Busted: FBI Agents Arrest Second Cincinnati Democrat On Federal Corruption Charges

(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Liberal strongholds across the country seem to be cesspools of corruption and fraud. Despite the fact that Ohio went easily to President Trump, that didn’t stop Democrats in the state’s liberal cities from taking their best shot at stealing the election for Biden.

Cincinnati City Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld (pictured above with Joe Biden) became the third member of city council to be arrested. Sittenfeld was arrested Thursday on federal corruption charges FOX19 NOW reports.

A 20-page indictment revealed the charges against Sittenfeld include an alleged scheme to funnel money from developers into a political action committee (PAC) that he actually secretly controlled, according to court records.

What Sittenfeld didn’t know was that the “developers” he was scamming were actually undercover FBI agents. The undercover agents gave him a total of $40,000 in checks to Sittenfeld on three separate occasions.

Sittenfeld is running for Cincinnati Mayor and with a track record like this he might just have a shot in such a progressive city. Democrats have an affinity for corruption and fraud.

Sittenfeld joins the ranks of arrested and disgraced city councilmembers to be arrested this year and the second one to be arrested this month alone.

In court records, federal authorities also revealed that they are investigating corruption and bribery related to votes and “development projects” and said that more prosecution is on the way.

At a news conference last week, US Attorney David DeVillers said that accepting campaign donations in exchange for favors is a violation of federal law. I think we’re all familiar with the concept of “quid pro quo” at this point.

City Councilmember Jeff Pastor was arrested Nov. 4 on felony charges of bribery, extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other crimes, FOX19 reports. The other councilmember arrested this year was Tamaya Dennard who was arrested in February on charges she accepted bribes for her vote.

Dennard resigned in March and then pleaded guilty to wire fraud and is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 24.

Pastor’s council colleagues and others throughout the state have called on him to also resign but so far he has not. Sittenfeld is also being called on to resign.

“Obviously anyone who is facing such serious allegations owes it to the community to resign,” Councilman David Mann told FOX19 NOW Thursday.

On Monday, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost requested that the state’s top court begin the process to suspend Pastor.

Pastor, the only Republican of the three, is insisting that he has evidence of entrapment but a group of Republicans including State Rep. Tom Brinkman and four other Cincinnati voters sued in Hamilton County Probate Court to force Pastor to resign.

Councilwoman Betsy Sundermann humorously posted a Twitter poll on Wednesday asking if followers thought any other council members would be indicted. She has since deleted the tweet.
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
Just keep this in mind. These people spent Billions of dollars on ADS. Ads that were mostly useless. How much would they be willing to spend cheating and directly influencing the vote? Probably more than they'd spend on ads IMO.
Since they're using our stolen money, whatever it takes!
 

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
https://twitter.com/HaroldWren11/status/1329999206220697600

1605971087413.png


Rising serpent Flag of United States

@rising_serpent

·

What law firm is representing Dominion voting systems?



Harold Wren

@HaroldWren11



Perkins Coie.

This law firm just keeps showing up in the darndest places



https://steemit.com/informationwar/@richq11/connecting-some-dots-hrc-perkins-coie-backpage-com



By now almost everyone knows about the relationship between Hillary Clinton, the DNC, law firm Perkins Coie, atty's Marc Elias and Michael Sussman and their relationship to Fusion GPS and the Russia Collusion hoax. There's another less known relationship- the relationship between all of the above and human/child sex trafficking. Doesn't it seem a little odd that one of the most powerful law firms in Washington and across the world, for that matter, would have over $2 million in assets seized when Backpage.com was busted last fall? In a December 2018 filing in an Arizona court, the defendants were given 30 days to attempt to claim their assets… that was up on January 5. Among the defendants was none other than the law firm that represents the Democratic Party.



So, we have Arizona, who legally kidnaps more children per year than any other state, and a hub for child sex trafficking whose laws protecting children were written by Perkins Coie, who was not only the law firm of HRC/DNC but linked financially to Backpage.com, also in Arizona. There is also evidence that Soros and Backpage funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to the DNC through Perkins Coie. This is going to need a lot more investigation, but let me leave you with this… Perkins Coie is not only the law form of Backpage.com, HRC/DNC, but they are the center of human trafficking legal network. Just as they did in Arizona, Perkins Coie, with over 1000 lawyers in numerous countries, it at the forefront of controlling human trafficking legislation world wide.



https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5691421-Notice-Other.html



https://westvirginia.forums.rivals.com/threads/backpage-com-busted-for-world-wide-human-trafficking-perkins-coie-hrc.195844/



http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/02/perkins-coie-childrens-rights-covered.html#axzz5dRxA2Xj4
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
Nah, over much to quick. I want to see them desperately twitching trying to breathe knowing that those are their last moments. It should be on pay per view
Yeah we paid good money for these seats and waited, what to some felt like forever, for the show to start. Ya damn well bet I'm going to "Enjoy the show" !
 

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
1605971429665.png

https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html



https://twitter.com/KingMakerFT/status/1330043241371213825



BINGO! Edward Solomon hAas figured out the voting machine Algorithm in Philly, explained in this video. Brilliant work. Dominion uses a set of several different integer ratios, assigns each, such as 1:18 (1 T vote for 18 B), to two, three or four precincts. Then every time the

citywide system has a global update, each of those ratios transfer to a different set of precincts, where the vote counts conform to the assigned ratios until the next global update, when the ratios transfer again to a new set of precincts. Then the votes from the new set

conform to the assigned ratios until the next reset- and so on. Hard to catch but dominion is clearly applying an algorithm to adjust the votes, and is doing it by sliding the ratios from precinct to precinct over time. Here’s the video:

https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html
 

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,815
Likes
95,930
Location
Earth
1605972752664.png
 

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,815
Likes
95,930
Location
Earth
1605972823950.png
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,478
Likes
21,501
View attachment 189902
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html



https://twitter.com/KingMakerFT/status/1330043241371213825



BINGO! Edward Solomon hAas figured out the voting machine Algorithm in Philly, explained in this video. Brilliant work. Dominion uses a set of several different integer ratios, assigns each, such as 1:18 (1 T vote for 18 B), to two, three or four precincts. Then every time the

citywide system has a global update, each of those ratios transfer to a different set of precincts, where the vote counts conform to the assigned ratios until the next global update, when the ratios transfer again to a new set of precincts. Then the votes from the new set

conform to the assigned ratios until the next reset- and so on. Hard to catch but dominion is clearly applying an algorithm to adjust the votes, and is doing it by sliding the ratios from precinct to precinct over time. Here’s the video:

https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html
This video is also available on bitchute.com:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lqw0wDQ0kJXy/

You can read viewer comments without having to login.

A viewer comment and a comment by Edward Solomon:

  • 9 hours ago
    TexasOutlaw
    Great work autist. Only bad thing I saw was the 3:48 ratio. Ratio is 1:16. You were balls deep in numbers at that point and that's why you overlooked being able to reduce it. That aside, great fuckin job. Level up time. I award you an additional 5 IQ points, 10 MAGA fist bumps and a shiny new KAG-2020 Trump Wins trophy .




  • 15 hours ago
    EdwardSolomon
    To repeat this experiment, take any 2020 election dataset with timestamps. Make a new column, with the array formula (Trump votes divided by Total Votes). Call this Column Z (Ratio Column). Then sort the spreadsheet by: Column Z (ratio) Then by: Time Column then by District/Precinct Column. It's that easy!
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,478
Likes
21,501
GF201120.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,635
Likes
105,567
Location
Rocky Mountains
Not sure if posted before...


Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
FOREIGN POLICY

Issued on: September 12, 2018

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):​
(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and​
(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.​
The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.​
(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.​
(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.​
(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.​
(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.​

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;​
(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or​
(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.​
(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.​
(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.​
Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and​
(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:​
(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;​
(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;​
(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;​
(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;​
(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;​
(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;​
(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;​
(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or​
(ix) any other measures authorized by law.​

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.​

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;​
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;​
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;​
(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;​
(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;​
(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;​
(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;​
(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and​
(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.​

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or​
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.​
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.​
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.​

DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
September 12, 2018.
WhiteHouse.gov
 
Last edited:

Voodoo

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
2,959
Likes
4,281
Location
Deep Underground Bunker
View attachment 189902
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html



https://twitter.com/KingMakerFT/status/1330043241371213825



BINGO! Edward Solomon hAas figured out the voting machine Algorithm in Philly, explained in this video. Brilliant work. Dominion uses a set of several different integer ratios, assigns each, such as 1:18 (1 T vote for 18 B), to two, three or four precincts. Then every time the

citywide system has a global update, each of those ratios transfer to a different set of precincts, where the vote counts conform to the assigned ratios until the next global update, when the ratios transfer again to a new set of precincts. Then the votes from the new set

conform to the assigned ratios until the next reset- and so on. Hard to catch but dominion is clearly applying an algorithm to adjust the votes, and is doing it by sliding the ratios from precinct to precinct over time. Here’s the video:

https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html
I don't know. That's a very long video. But if it does work like that then it would be VERY easy to prove its all wrong. Just go hand count a few precincts. If its playing with those numbers that badly then none of them will be accurate. But you would need an actual random sample and trustworthy people in the recount.
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
8,903
Likes
18,449
Location
North Carolina
Yeah we paid good money for these seats and waited, what to some felt like forever, for the show to start. Ya damn well bet I'm going to "Enjoy the show" !
It’s like being front row at the final Led Zep concert and the curtain is 1 hour late from opening
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
U.S. elections
The AP has called the Presidential race for Joe Biden. See more on Google.
SHOW ME
Robust safeguards help ensure the integrity of elections and results. Learn more
#Walkaway #MarchForTrump #Georgia
LIVE: March for Trump in Atlanta, Georgia (Nov. 21) | NTD
20,575 watching now


NTD
700K subscribers


SUBSCRIBED
Started streaming 109 minutes ago
A "Rescue America" rally, organized by #Walkaway, is being held outside the CNN Center in Atlanta, Georgia, on Saturday at 10 a.m. A "Stop the Steal" march for Trump will begin at 1 p.m. #MarchForTrump #Georgia #Atlanta

 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
Not sure if posted before...


Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
FOREIGN POLICY

Issued on: September 12, 2018

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.

Accordingly, I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):​
(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and​
(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.​
The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.​
(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.​
(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.​
(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.​
(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments; ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and open debate.​

Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:

(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;​
(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or​
(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.​
(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.​
(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order.​
Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section 2(b) of this order; and​
(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:​
(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;​
(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;​
(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing credit to a person;​
(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;​
(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;​
(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of a person;​
(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;​
(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or​
(ix) any other measures authorized by law.​

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.

Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.​

Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;​
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;​
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;​
(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;​
(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;​
(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;​
(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;​
(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and​
(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.​

Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.

Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or​
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.​
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.​
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.​

DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
September 12, 2018.
WhiteHouse.gov
Doesnt bother me personally but fyi i posted that last page if ots of concern to anyone. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/2020-us-election-thread.410642/page-103#post-2044233
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
12,368
Likes
24,978
Nah, over much to quick. I want to see them desperately twitching trying to breathe knowing that those are their last moments. It should be on pay per view
Nope! It should be braodcast free for EVERYONE TO SEE and takes as a warning.
 

nowon

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Seeker
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
580
Likes
906
Location
Now-here
The more and more I find out I think the rope is letting them off easy. I am starting to like the North Korean idea of a firing squad with an anti aircraft battery.
The penalty for State treason in ancient China was to be drawned and quartered using four oxen to pull arms and legs off the criminal, followed by chopping the head off and sticking it on a pike in the town center.

If there were any mitigating factors, like helping the state after the fact, the criminal would be killed quickly and painlessly before being drawned and quartered.

Every person was required to witness the execution as a reminder of the penalty and for future deterrence.

That system worked fairly well for a very long time.
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
11,657
Likes
15,777
Location
On a speck of dust
The penalty for State treason in ancient China was to be drawned and quartered using four oxen to pull arms and legs off the criminal, followed by chopping the head off and sticking it on a pike in the town center.

If there were any mitigating factors, like helping the state after the fact, the criminal would be killed quickly and painlessly before being drawned and quartered.

Every person was required to witness the execution as a reminder of the penalty and for future deterrence.

That system worked fairly well for a very long time.
China the republic or China the democracy?
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
Ok Ziti, take this with a fist full of salt to keep the blood pressure regumalated.


MENU



Former Texas Prosecutor Sidney Powell (The Epoch Times)MORE
2020 ELECTION
Sidney Powell: Trump Team Will Prove Case ‘Within Next Two Weeks’ in Court
BY JACK PHILLIPS
November 20, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
FacebookTweetParlerEmail
4714 Shares

840 Comments
Seemingly responding to calls from conservatives to present evidence of voter fraud in the Nov. 3 election, Trump team lawyer Sidney Powell said the campaign will be able to present their claims in court in the “next two weeks.”
“We have more evidence now than half the prison population is imprisoned on,” Powell told Fox Business on Friday, responding to a statement from Dominion Voting Systems in denying the Trump team’s claim that software could be manipulated to overturn the election against President Donald Trump, as well as claims the company had links to Venezuela’s regime.
“All I can tell you is that well, the company might have somehow severed or tried to sever the relationships recently, I don’t know how they are parsing their words, but I can tell you that the company was started with Venezuelan money in Venezuela for the express purpose of rigging elections for Hugo Chavez,” Powell said. Powell also said that people could remotely watch the votes and flip them in real time.
“We have evidence now of information from the systems going to three or four different foreign countries during the time of the election, those countries themselves could have watched the live votes come in and changed the numbers,” said Powell. “There’s significant evidence of foreign interference from the worst communist countries on the Earth with our election.”
Dominion has repeatedly denied that it has ties with Venezuela, Cuba, or any other countries, saying that it also has no ties to Smartmatic, another election software company that was created by Venezuelan engineers years ago. Smartmatic has also denied the Trump legal team’s allegations. Dominion said that it purchased assets from Sequoia, a previous subsidiary of Smartmatic in 2010.
“Dominion is plainly a non-partisan American company with no ties to Venezuela or Cuba,” Dominion told news outlets on Thursday. “Vote counts are conducted by county and state election officials, not by Dominion, or any other election technology company—our systems support tabulation by those officials alone.”
The firm also said it did not operate systems in some contested areas such as Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Wisconsin’s Dane County.
MOST READ

Williams College Mathematician Flags up to 100,000 Ballots in Pennsylvania

But Powell said they have “got all kinds of evidence that is mathematically irrefutable by experts, including three professors at Princeton, and it all proves the same thing, the evidence of individual poll watchers who saw votes come in, saw the machines manipulated.” She did not provide evidence in the Fox Business interview or point to any figures.
Her statements Friday came after Tucker Carlson of Fox News and others, including Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), called for evidence to back up the claims.
“She never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed at the press conference,” Carlson said. “Powell did say that electronic voting is dangerous, and she’s right, but she never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one,” he said.
RELATED

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Says Team Will Sue Officials 'To Invalidate' Election Results

Powell, in response, told Fox Business that she wasn’t angry about the evidence demand but Carlson was “insulting, demanding, and rude, and I told him not to contact me again, in those terms.”
“In fact, I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation, and I offered him another witness who could explain the math and the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person,” she added.
Dominion and Smartmatic have not responded to requests for comment.


https://m.theepochtimes.com/sidney-...dium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-20-4
Help us spread the truth. Share this article with your friends.
FacebookTweetParlerEmail Copy Link
4714 Shares
TOP NEWS

Twitter to Give @POTUS Handle to Biden on Jan. 20

NEW
sharecomments6

GOP Urges Michigan to Delay Certifying Election for ‘Full Audit and Investigation’ of Wayne County Results

1HR
share128comments24

Pelosi Downplays Democrat Election Losses in House

2HR
share37comments54

State Judge Dismisses Final Pending Election-Related Lawsuit in Arizona

4HR
share67comments121

GOP ‘Freedom Force’ Vows to Fight Socialism, Counter ‘The Squad’ in House

4HR
share1166comments129
From Around the Web

New conservative news aggregator; is Drudge worried?
conservativeplaylist.com


Megyn Kelly to Newsmax TV: Biden's Call for Unity Disingenuous
newsmax.com


Prince Azim of Brunei, Sultan of Brunei’s Son, Dies Aged 38
ntd.com


‘Burn Down The Republican Party’: Jennifer Rubin Wants No ‘Survivors’
dailycaller.com


Bodyguard Opens Up About Working With Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie
newsmax.com


Michelle Obama Attacks 71 Million Trump Voters For ‘Supporting Lies'
dailycaller.com


AOC Promotes ‘Enemies List’ Of Trump Supporters
thepoliticalinsider.com


‘So Awkward’ Actor Archie Lyndhurst Dead At 19
dailycaller.com



Copyright © 2000 - 2020
 

Shortstack

Bain of the Authoritarian Follower
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,661
Likes
1,236
Location
Connecticut Gold Coast
dude....

if you ever come to texas

dont mention coloring your hair

unless you are gay or something
Stage makup coming off? Before you go on TV, they slather this makeup (which is like the foundation powder a woman uses to hide zits, wrinkles, or skin blotches for instance) on your face. No makeup and you looked almost washed out on TV. What I have heard from people in the business. Why anyone appearing on Tucker's show has to first goto the makeup area. Not trying to be funny here. Prob how it sounds though
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
Stage makup coming off? Before you go on TV, they slather this makeup (which is like the foundation powder a woman uses to hide zits, wrinkles, or skin blotches for instance) on your face. No makeup and you looked almost washed out on TV. What I have heard from people in the business. Why anyone appearing on Tucker's show has to first goto the makeup area. Not trying to be funny here. Prob how it sounds though
Doesn't sound funny cuz you're 100% spot on. That's why we have our very own orange man.
 

Shortstack

Bain of the Authoritarian Follower
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,661
Likes
1,236
Location
Connecticut Gold Coast
View attachment 189885
BREAKING: Kirkland & Ellis law firm withdraws from representing the Pennsylvania Secretary of State in defense against the Trump campaign's lawsuit.

6:37 PM · Nov 20, 2020



https://twitter.com/LifeNewsHQ/status/1329931988027969536
Kirkland had no choice but to recuse itself (walk away) from the case. Turns out that one of Kirkland's associate's (an associate is a first to third year lawyer), who was unaffiliated with the case, made a phone call to a Republican. Not sure who the Republican was, but there were threats and verbal abuse. Committing assault is not advisable if you are a member of the bar. The associate will lose his/her job, and will also be disbarred. Not surprised that Kirkland withdrew.
 

nowon

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Seeker
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
580
Likes
906
Location
Now-here
This law was in effect at least as early as the Tang Dynasty around 650 AD.

Below is from Wikipedia

The Tang dynasty or Tang Empire was an imperial dynasty ruling China from 618 to 907, with an interregnum between 690 and 705. It was preceded by the Sui dynasty and followed by the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. Historians generally regard the Tang as a high point in Chinese civilization, and a golden age of cosmopolitan culture. Tang territory, acquired through the military campaigns of its early rulers, rivaled that of the Han dynasty.

The Lǐ family (李) founded the dynasty, seizing power during the decline and collapse of the Sui Empire and inaugurating a period of progress and stability in the first half of the dynasty's rule. The dynasty was formally interrupted during 690-705 when Empress Wu Zetian seized the throne, proclaiming the Wu Zhou dynasty and becoming the only legitimate Chinese empress regnant. The devastating An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) shook the nation and led to the decline of central authority in the dynasty's latter half. Like the previous Sui dynasty, the Tang maintained a civil-service system by recruiting scholar-officials through standardized examinations and recommendations to office. The rise of regional military governors known as jiedushi during the 9th century undermined this civil order. The dynasty and central government went into decline by the latter half of the 9th century; agrarian rebellions resulted in mass population loss and displacement, widespread poverty, and further government dysfunction that ultimately ended the dynasty in 907.

The Tang capital at Chang'an (present-day Xi'an) was then the world's most populous city. Two censuses of the 7th and 8th centuries estimated the empire's population at about 50 million people, which grew to an estimated 80 million by the dynasty's end. From its numerous subjects, the dynasty raised professional and conscripted armies of hundreds of thousands of troops to contend with nomadic powers for control of Inner Asia and the lucrative trade-routes along the Silk Road. Far-flung kingdoms and states paid tribute to the Tang court, while the Tang also indirectly controlled several regions through a protectorate system. The adoption of the title Khan of Heaven by the Tang emperor Taizong was eastern Asia's first "simultaneous kingship". In addition to its political hegemony, the Tang exerted a powerful cultural influence over neighboring East Asian nations such as Japan and Korea.

Chinese culture flourished and further matured during the Tang era. It is traditionally considered the greatest age for Chinese poetry. Two of China's most famous poets, Li Bai and Du Fu, belonged to this age, as did many famous painters such as Han Gan, Zhang Xuan, and Zhou Fang. Tang scholars compiled a rich variety of historical literature, as well as encyclopedias and geographical works. Notable innovations included the development of woodblock printing. Buddhism became a major influence in Chinese culture, with native Chinese sects gaining prominence. However, in the 840s Emperor Wuzong enacted policies to suppress Buddhism, which subsequently declined in influence.
 

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,719
Likes
53,245
Location
Qmerica
MENU




Play Video
CHINA INSIDER
Video: Green Card Holder in Nevada Received Mail-In Ballot
BY EPOCH VIDEO
November 21, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
FacebookTweetParlerEmail
2135 Shares

196 Comments
Residents in Nevada’s Clark County held a “Stop the Steal” rally to protest election fraud last Saturday. A Japanese man who is a green card holder exposed that although he is not a U.S. citizen, he received a mail-in ballot. He was puzzled as to why he was registered as a voter by local authorities.

https://m.theepochtimes.com/green-c...dium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-21-2

Help us spread the truth. Share this article with your friends.
FacebookTweetParlerEmail Copy Link
2135 Shares
MOST READ

Williams College Mathematician Flags up to 100,000 Ballots in Pennsylvania

RELATED

Republican Senate Candidate John James Requests Two More Weeks to Audit Before Certification

TOP NEWS

Kentucky AG Sues Governor Over Order Banning In-person Instruction at Religious Schools

NEW
share5comments1

Twitter to Give @POTUS Handle to Biden on Jan. 20

BREAKING NEWS
share635comments321

GOP Urges Michigan to Delay Certifying Election for ‘Full Audit and Investigation’ of Wayne County Results

3HR
share319comments57

Pelosi Downplays Democrat Election Losses in House

3HR
share47comments80

State Judge Dismisses Final Pending Election-Related Lawsuit in Arizona

5HR
share84comments129
From Around the Web

'The Mandalorian' Fans Push Disney to Drop Actress Over Anti-Mask Tweets
newsmax.com


Actor Eddie Hassell, 30, Killed in Texas Shooting: Police
ntd.com


Fox News Cancels 'Justice With Judge Jeanine' This Weekend Over Trump
newsmax.com


‘American Idol’ Contestant Nikki McKibbin Dies at 42
ntd.com


Outrage Over Ellen DeGeneres' People's Choice Award Win
newsmax.com


Prince Azim of Brunei, Sultan of Brunei’s Son, Dies Aged 38
ntd.com


New conservative news aggregator; is Drudge worried?
conservativeplaylist.com


‘So Awkward’ Actor Archie Lyndhurst Dead At 19
dailycaller.com



Copyright © 2000 - 2020