- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,956
- Reaction score
- 30,855
The part with Jenna is only the first 70 minutes or so. If that makes a difference for anyone.Sidebar with Jenna Ellis! Viva & Barnes LIVE (2:03:28)
Published on Mar 23, 2022 by Viva Frei-----
If YouTube deletes the video, it's also available on Rumble.com here...
Sidebar with Jenna Ellis! Viva & Barnes LIVE! (2:02:51)
Sidebar with Jenna Ellis! Viva & Barnes LIVE!
Donald Trump's attorney and overall incredible person, Jenna Ellis!rumble.com
I've not contributed to the RNC in ten years but I won't ever contribute again after hearing Jenna. The RNC raised over $365 million dollars under the guise of Trump's legal cases yet they didn't spend the money for that. As Barnes mentions, that's fraudulent fund raising. And Jenna clearly says Ronna McDaniel is a liar.
It was an interesting interview. I hope they have her on again.
RNC is corrupt... like all those poliTICs
General Flynn on Telegram
The indomitable Brian Cates is spilling a lot of beans below all good in my judgement. The question is what next? We need accountability from the various State legislators to hold criminals accountable across all the states these “mules” operated within and to make historic determinations about our presidential election of 2020. The geo-tracking capability is exact in locating a device and once that device is tied to a person through other means (video, et al.), you have your target. 2000 Mules will highlight the egregious crimes committed against our nation and against every citizen. The courts won’t fix this. The courts do not decide the outcomes of our elections. They only decide on constitutional issues. Only we the people through our duly elected county and state officials decide. As Americans have stepped up to protect our children by getting in front of school boards and starting to overturn school boards across the country (close to 200 now), we need to do the same with our county election commissioners and our state representatives. Turn the primaries into a statement that we the people are done with the establishment and get out and vote to choose America First candidates and simultaneously, take Brian’s info and other information and demand answers. We’re at risk of going to war overseas because of a false election…that is how serious the last presidential election sham was.
This information described below by Brian is precisely why he is such a great journalist to follow.
_________________
Brian Cates Telegram:
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed that there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geo-fence” technology able to track cell phones within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the vote purchased 10 trillion of cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) during the period from 10/1 - 11/8, which encompassed several weeks before early voting began on 10/20. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
t.me
The indomitable Brian Cates is spilling a lot of beans below all good in my judgement. The question is what next? We need accountability from the various State legislators to hold criminals accountable across all the states these “mules” operated within and to make historic determinations about our presidential election of 2020. The geo-tracking capability is exact in locating a device and once that device is tied to a person through other means (video, et al.), you have your target. 2000 Mules will highlight the egregious crimes committed against our nation and against every citizen. The courts won’t fix this. The courts do not decide the outcomes of our elections. They only decide on constitutional issues. Only we the people through our duly elected county and state officials decide. As Americans have stepped up to protect our children by getting in front of school boards and starting to overturn school boards across the country (close to 200 now), we need to do the same with our county election commissioners and our state representatives. Turn the primaries into a statement that we the people are done with the establishment and get out and vote to choose America First candidates and simultaneously, take Brian’s info and other information and demand answers. We’re at risk of going to war overseas because of a false election…that is how serious the last presidential election sham was.
This information described below by Brian is precisely why he is such a great journalist to follow.
_________________
Brian Cates Telegram:
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed that there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geo-fence” technology able to track cell phones within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the vote purchased 10 trillion of cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) during the period from 10/1 - 11/8, which encompassed several weeks before early voting began on 10/20. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The indomitable Brian Cates is spilling a lot of beans below all good in my judgement. The question is what next? We need accountability from the various State legislators to hold criminals accountable across all the states these “mules” operated within and to make historic determinations about...
Hmmm...
-
December 22, 2020
By Brian Cates
When new declassifications are made regarding what happened in the key period from January to June of 2017, it is important to look at the early Spygate events with a fresh pair of eyes.
A good reporter can use recent disclosures to reassess their understanding of past events. Reporters who can’t or won’t do that will not have an accurate grasp of the story, and thus do their readers a disservice.
Many pundits, reporters, and media personalities on the Right have, at this point, set-in-stone narratives about Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein. New information must be followed wherever it leads. You cannot let an old narrative stop you, no matter how popular it is or who seemed to be publicly endorsing it.
Sessions has been characterized as being a coward paralyzed by the overwhelming task of defending the President who appointed him from a host of saboteurs inside the law enforcement agencies he was leading. Rosenstein is viewed as a backstabbing snake and a top Spygate plotter, supposedly conspiring to remove President Trump from office.
The recent declassifications show that these narratives are wrong. It now looks as though the much-maligned Rosenstein was running the very public Mueller Special Counsel’s Office and the very secret Durham investigation at the same time.
Here are what the declassifications by the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe have revealed since last October:
Many of these leaks were inaccurate and even deliberately misleading, including one stating that General Flynn had flipped on the President and was singing like a canary to Mueller about the supposed Russian collusion the Trump campaign had been involved in.
The other investigation Rosenstein oversaw? Nobody even knew about it. There were no leaks from April of 2017 all the way to January 2019, when Durham’s name first surfaced in news reports related to congressional testimony that had occurred in October of 2018.
While those inside and around the Mueller Special Counsel’s Office held the rapt attention of the nation with frequent news coverage based on what often turned out to be false leaks, the Durham investigation continued under complete radio silence. Not only were there no leaks concerning Durham’s work, the media never caught wind he was there.
The contrast between the two investigations that Rosenstein had oversight of could not be starker.
In his text messages to Lisa Page, Strzok does not state who gave the case to Durham. He limits his comment to lamenting that the case was not assigned to the FBI’s own National Security Division rather than an outside investigator like Durham. Strzok labels the investigation being handed to Durham as “bad news.”
But there are only two real candidates for Durham’s April 2017 appointment: Jeff Sessions or Rod Rosenstein.
And this puts us face to face with the real issue. Either Sessions’ recusal was real, or it was not. Either Rosenstein was running all the Trump/Russia 2016 election-related DOJ investigations, or he was not. Which is it? Who was really in charge? There are many reasons to believe Sessions’ recusal was real because of the numerous conflicts of interest he faced.
The media on both the Left and the Right has managed to downplay the real bombshell from Devin Nunes’ March 22, 2017 press conference when he revealed that several members of the Trump transition team were having their electronic communications “incidentally” intercepted, compiled, unmasked, and then placed in reports that had been circulated at the highest levels of the outgoing Obama administration.
Four years later, the only Trump transition team member who has been positively identified as having their text messages, emails and phone calls intercepted and unmasked is Trump’s former National Security Advisor, General Flynn. Who were the other Trump team members that were being spied on during the transition period? We still don’t know. But it’s clear from Nunes’ presser that this was far more than just one person. It was multiple team members.
Who was on the Trump transition team from November, 2016 to January, 2017?
The conflict of interest is glaring. This is why Sessions recused himself on March 2 of 2017 and handed the oversight of Trump/Russia and 2016 election-related investigations to his top deputy Rosenstein.
It was important for Sessions to recuse himself from handling any investigations involving people who had been spying on him for months, ever since he publicly began campaigning with and for Donald Trump in February of 2016. Their surreptitious surveillance of Sessions likely continued even after he was sworn in as Attorney General on Feb. 9, 2017.
The leak campaign targeting Sessions as compromised by Russia continued right through the former Senator assuming the office of Attorney General. These continued leaks by “anonymous officials familiar with the matter” culminated in the absurd spectacle of Sessions having to testify in front of Congress that he was not a Russian agent or engaged in collusion with the government of Vladimir Putin.
And so, we see that if Sessions’ recusal was real, and there is no reason to believe it was not, then it was Rod Rosenstein who charged Durham with investigating the Spygate leaks in April, 2017.
Is it only a coincidence that just a week after departing Attorney General Barr revealed Durham has been running a new Special Counsels Office, DNI Ratcliffe declassified new Strzok/Page text messages showing the existence of multiple federal counterintelligence investigations of the Trump campaign that have been hidden from sight for more then four years?
Ratcliffe declassifying this now means that making this revelation public will not interfere with Durham’s ongoing investigation, which means Durham has been investigating these newly revealed FBI cases that targeted Trump and his associates prior to the launch of Crossfire Hurricane.
Now here is the $64,000 question nobody but UncoverDC is asking: Why didn’t any of this explosive evidence leak out before it was officially declassified through the proper channels beginning in October? How do you put the fear of God into experienced leakers like James Comey, John Brennan, the entire Mueller team, or dozens of members of the U.S. Congress?
Remember, these are people with a bevy of corporate media stenographers at their disposal. Any of them could have leaked all of this information long ago. Why didn’t they?
Brian Cates entered the political journalism arena in March 2012, following the death of Andrew Breitbart. He is currently a writer for the Epoch Times and UncoverDC. Brian is based in South Texas and is the author of “Nobody Asked For My Opinion … But Here It Is Anyway!”
uncoverdc.com
Was Rosenstein Running the Mueller Special Counsel and the Spygate Investigation Simultaneously?
By Brian Cates-
December 22, 2020
By Brian Cates
When new declassifications are made regarding what happened in the key period from January to June of 2017, it is important to look at the early Spygate events with a fresh pair of eyes.
A good reporter can use recent disclosures to reassess their understanding of past events. Reporters who can’t or won’t do that will not have an accurate grasp of the story, and thus do their readers a disservice.
Many pundits, reporters, and media personalities on the Right have, at this point, set-in-stone narratives about Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein. New information must be followed wherever it leads. You cannot let an old narrative stop you, no matter how popular it is or who seemed to be publicly endorsing it.
Sessions has been characterized as being a coward paralyzed by the overwhelming task of defending the President who appointed him from a host of saboteurs inside the law enforcement agencies he was leading. Rosenstein is viewed as a backstabbing snake and a top Spygate plotter, supposedly conspiring to remove President Trump from office.
The recent declassifications show that these narratives are wrong. It now looks as though the much-maligned Rosenstein was running the very public Mueller Special Counsel’s Office and the very secret Durham investigation at the same time.
Here are what the declassifications by the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe have revealed since last October:
All the major Spygate scandal players knew by September, 2016 that the Trump/Russia collusion narrative being peddled to them by various political operatives was coming straight from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Handwritten notes by CIA Director John Brennan show he briefed President Obama on the Clinton dirty tricks campaign on July 28, 2016.- U.S. Attorney John Durham started his Spygate-related investigations—likely related to the leaking campaigns engaged in by the plotters—in April, 2017.
- Durham was assigned to investigate the coordinated Spygate leaking campaigns inside the FBI by Rosenstein because Sessions had recused himself from all Trump/Russia and 2016 election-related matters on March 2, 2017, more than a month before Durham was tasked to begin investigating.
- Rosenstein was already overseeing Durham’s Spygate leak investigation before James Comey was fired and the Mueller Special Counsel was formed in May, 2017.
- Lead Crossfire Hurricane agent Peter Strzok is seen in a text message discussing multiple other federal counterintelligence investigations targeting Trump and associates for Russian collusion before Crossfire launched on July 31, 2016.
- None of these other multiple counterintelligence cases targeting Trump had been publicly revealed before.
- Durham’s Special Counsel Office is already investigating these long-hidden counterintelligence cases. They can only be declassified if letting the public know about them would not interfere with Durham’s ongoing work.
Two very different investigations
One investigation that Rosenstein oversaw was very public. Frequent leaks about the Mueller Special Counsel’s work appeared in the news media for the 22 months it was active.Many of these leaks were inaccurate and even deliberately misleading, including one stating that General Flynn had flipped on the President and was singing like a canary to Mueller about the supposed Russian collusion the Trump campaign had been involved in.
The other investigation Rosenstein oversaw? Nobody even knew about it. There were no leaks from April of 2017 all the way to January 2019, when Durham’s name first surfaced in news reports related to congressional testimony that had occurred in October of 2018.
While those inside and around the Mueller Special Counsel’s Office held the rapt attention of the nation with frequent news coverage based on what often turned out to be false leaks, the Durham investigation continued under complete radio silence. Not only were there no leaks concerning Durham’s work, the media never caught wind he was there.
The contrast between the two investigations that Rosenstein had oversight of could not be starker.
Was Sessions’ recusal real?
The big question that immediately arises in the face of these new declassifications about Durham, and when he really started his Spygate investigations, is who it was that appointed him.In his text messages to Lisa Page, Strzok does not state who gave the case to Durham. He limits his comment to lamenting that the case was not assigned to the FBI’s own National Security Division rather than an outside investigator like Durham. Strzok labels the investigation being handed to Durham as “bad news.”
But there are only two real candidates for Durham’s April 2017 appointment: Jeff Sessions or Rod Rosenstein.And this puts us face to face with the real issue. Either Sessions’ recusal was real, or it was not. Either Rosenstein was running all the Trump/Russia 2016 election-related DOJ investigations, or he was not. Which is it? Who was really in charge? There are many reasons to believe Sessions’ recusal was real because of the numerous conflicts of interest he faced.
The media on both the Left and the Right has managed to downplay the real bombshell from Devin Nunes’ March 22, 2017 press conference when he revealed that several members of the Trump transition team were having their electronic communications “incidentally” intercepted, compiled, unmasked, and then placed in reports that had been circulated at the highest levels of the outgoing Obama administration.
Four years later, the only Trump transition team member who has been positively identified as having their text messages, emails and phone calls intercepted and unmasked is Trump’s former National Security Advisor, General Flynn. Who were the other Trump team members that were being spied on during the transition period? We still don’t know. But it’s clear from Nunes’ presser that this was far more than just one person. It was multiple team members.
Who was on the Trump transition team from November, 2016 to January, 2017?
- Donald J. Trump
- Donald Trump, Jr.
- Ivanka Trump
- Jared Kushner
- Mike Pence
- Mike Pompeo
- Rudy Giuliani
- General Michael Flynn
- Devin Nunes
- Jeff Sessions
The conflict of interest is glaring. This is why Sessions recused himself on March 2 of 2017 and handed the oversight of Trump/Russia and 2016 election-related investigations to his top deputy Rosenstein.
It was important for Sessions to recuse himself from handling any investigations involving people who had been spying on him for months, ever since he publicly began campaigning with and for Donald Trump in February of 2016. Their surreptitious surveillance of Sessions likely continued even after he was sworn in as Attorney General on Feb. 9, 2017.The leak campaign targeting Sessions as compromised by Russia continued right through the former Senator assuming the office of Attorney General. These continued leaks by “anonymous officials familiar with the matter” culminated in the absurd spectacle of Sessions having to testify in front of Congress that he was not a Russian agent or engaged in collusion with the government of Vladimir Putin.
And so, we see that if Sessions’ recusal was real, and there is no reason to believe it was not, then it was Rod Rosenstein who charged Durham with investigating the Spygate leaks in April, 2017.
Is it only a coincidence that just a week after departing Attorney General Barr revealed Durham has been running a new Special Counsels Office, DNI Ratcliffe declassified new Strzok/Page text messages showing the existence of multiple federal counterintelligence investigations of the Trump campaign that have been hidden from sight for more then four years?
Ratcliffe declassifying this now means that making this revelation public will not interfere with Durham’s ongoing investigation, which means Durham has been investigating these newly revealed FBI cases that targeted Trump and his associates prior to the launch of Crossfire Hurricane.
Now here is the $64,000 question nobody but UncoverDC is asking: Why didn’t any of this explosive evidence leak out before it was officially declassified through the proper channels beginning in October? How do you put the fear of God into experienced leakers like James Comey, John Brennan, the entire Mueller team, or dozens of members of the U.S. Congress?
Remember, these are people with a bevy of corporate media stenographers at their disposal. Any of them could have leaked all of this information long ago. Why didn’t they?
Brian Cates entered the political journalism arena in March 2012, following the death of Andrew Breitbart. He is currently a writer for the Epoch Times and UncoverDC. Brian is based in South Texas and is the author of “Nobody Asked For My Opinion … But Here It Is Anyway!”
Was Rosenstein Running the Mueller Special Counsel and the Spygate Investigation Simultaneously? - UncoverDC
What is going to be presented in this important UncoverDC column will be rejected out of hand by many people because it just won’t fit their already established narratives on what happened with the ever-growing SpyGate scandal since 2017.When new declassification's are made regarding what was...
uncoverdc.com
First up: A handpicked FBI counterintelligence team was going after the leakers in Congress beginning in April of 2017 when Sessions and RR formed it.
1.
www.theepochtimes.com
1.
Suspected Congressional Leakers Were Secretly Being Investigated by the DOJ All Along
Commentary Two prominent Democrat politicians who sit on the House Intelligence Committee have alerted the news media that ...
General Flynn on Telegram
We have trolls and others trying to shut this election integrity forum down simply because they hate…
But I urge those who can attend to attend (details below):
Election Integrity (EI) forum to be held in South Carolina
Call out to attend the Election Integrity Forum hosted by www.accfei.org
I urge all America First patriots to support Election Integrity efforts by attending the event to be held on the USS Yorktown 26 MAR (tomorrow), forum starts at 1:00 PM.
Go to www.accfei.org for complete details.
The American Citizens & Candidates Forum for Election Integrity needs your support. This is where your local action in the Palmetto State will have a national impact!
t.me
We have trolls and others trying to shut this election integrity forum down simply because they hate…
But I urge those who can attend to attend (details below):
Election Integrity (EI) forum to be held in South Carolina
Call out to attend the Election Integrity Forum hosted by www.accfei.org
I urge all America First patriots to support Election Integrity efforts by attending the event to be held on the USS Yorktown 26 MAR (tomorrow), forum starts at 1:00 PM.
Go to www.accfei.org for complete details.
The American Citizens & Candidates Forum for Election Integrity needs your support. This is where your local action in the Palmetto State will have a national impact!
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
We have trolls and others trying to shut this election integrity forum down simply because they hate… But I urge those who can attend to attend (details below): Election Integrity (EI) forum to be held in South Carolina Call out to attend the Election Integrity Forum hosted by www.accfei.org...
Brian Cates on Telegram
If True the Vote could buy this publicly available cell signal information in these states, then narrow it down to where they could forensically identify 138 particular mules in Wisconsin, and then go on even further to be able to determine how many of these mules participated in the violent summer 2020 rioting - 14 - guess who else could do that? And likely already has, as a backup to all of the surveillance flights that were going on?
Brian Cates ✪✪✪
If True the Vote could buy this publicly available cell signal information in these states, then narrow it down to where they could forensically identify 138 particular mules in Wisconsin, and then go on even further to be able to determine how many of these mules participated in the violent...
BOMBSHELL: Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Provides Evidence of Machine-Based Vote Manipulation
By Patrick Colbeck
MAR 25, 2022I first met Tina Peters at Mike Lindell’s CyberSymposium in August 2021. At the symposium, I learned that she had taken an image of her Dominion Voting System Democracy Suite v5.11-CO Election Management System before (May 23, 2021) and after (May 26, 2021) Dominion personnel came in to “service” her equipment. Frankly, this is the ONLY way any clerk could reasonably discern whether or not digital election fraud occurred on their watch.
In “appreciation” for her efforts to ensure the integrity of election records under her responsibility, she was indicted on 10 counts related to tampering with voting equipment. Her home was raided by the FBI. She has served time in jail.
We now know why authorities sought to make an example of her. By quietly capturing images of her election equipment before and after it was serviced by Dominion vendor personnel, she exposed that the the “servicing” resulted in the clear destruction of evidence that could be used in an audit of an election. Furthermore, she enabled a detailed forensic analysis of the electronic data from the 2020 general election. This detailed analysis has yielded clear evidence of the manipulation of election results.
The forensic reports are available for your review by clicking on each of the images below.
| Report #1 | Report #2 | Report #3 |
|
|
|
| KEY FINDINGS | KEY FINDINGS | KEY FINDINGS |
| Election records needed to support a post-election audit were deleted in violation of state and federal law | Demonstrates Dominion Voting System vulnerabilities and the presence of non-certified software capable of changing election results without detection. 36 wireless devices were found in County EMS system in violation of law and certification requirements. | Shows manipulation of votes. New election results databases were created during the middle of voting without any direction from clerks. Digital vote records were “reloaded” into new databases faster than any possible scan of ballots. Not all previous vote records were “reloaded”. |
Process Anomalies
Security Vulnerabilities
- A password was not necessary to access the EMS server
- Testing confirmed that an outside party could use a separate computer as well as a cell phone, with publicly available and widely used free software (none of which were part of the DVS D-Suite), to easily change election results.
- Non-certified software (SQL Server Management Studio) was found to be installed with Dominion Voting Systems in Mesa County, CO and Antrim County, MI
- SQL Server Management Studio provides unauthorized users with “back door” access to election results databases. The addition of this software is not necessary to the election process and allows any party with access to the EMS server to alter cast ballots, tallies, databases, ballots, and audit records.
- 36 wireless devices were found installed
- The wireless device installations were found to have negligible firewall protections
- Wireless device encryption can be easily broken
- The EMS server motherboard was manufactured in China. Chinese motherboards feature a well known “back door” that provides unauthorized access to equipment.
Certification Violations
- Federal certification requirements:
- Per EAC Testing & Certification Program, August 11, 2021, Page 7 “wireless systems are disallowed”
- 2002 VSS, para 3.2.1 specifies “d. For central-county systems…: Consolidation of vote selection data from multiple counting devices to generate jurisdiction-wide vote counts, including storage and reporting of the consolidated vote data…a target error rate of no more than one in 10,000,000 ballot positions.” A ballot position is each and every choice (e.g. a “bubble” which can be marked or filled-in) on a ballot selectable by a voter to convey their voting choices.
- State certification requirements:
- The Federal Election Commission’s 2002 Voting System Standards are defined in CO state law as the mandatory minimum standard for certification of voting systems.
- Colorado state statute § 1-5-601.5., specifies that a voting system which “…provides access to incomplete election returns and interactive inquiries before the completion of the official count…shall:
- a. be designed to provide external access to incomplete election returns only if that access for these purposes is authorized by the statutes and regulations of the using agency…
- b. Use voting system software and its security environment designed such that data accessible to interactive queries resides in an external file, or database, that is created and maintained by the elections software under the restrictions applying to any other output report, namely, that:
- 1) The output file or database has no provision for write-access back to the system.
- 2) Persons whose only authorized access is to the file or database are denied write-access, both to the file or database, and to the system,” and states that the Standards are “intended to address…risks to the integrity of a voting system…,” including “…Changing calculated vote totals;…” and “Preventing access to vote data, including individual votes and vote totals, to unauthorized individuals;…”
- The reports obtained show clear violations of both the federal and state certification requirements
- Any election conducted using non-certified election equipment should be decertified
Election Privatization
- Contrary to popular conceptions, clerks and their staff have very little access to and oversight of key election processes managed by electronic voting systems
- During the 2020 general election in Mesa County, CO, there was an unauthorized creation of 2 new election databases after voting had already started (CO allows early voting)
- It is apparent that private entities, either manually or via an automated script, modified election records without direction from clerks
- The CO Secretary of State ordered the destruction of election records by private entities
- During the 2021 municipal election in Grand Junction, CO, there was also an unauthorized creation of 2 new election databases after voting had already started (CO allows early voting)
Help Desk
- After the new databases were created and reloaded, election workers noticed repeat adjudications of the same ballots and issues with ballots in process of being adjudicated
- When election workers called the Dominion help desk, they were told that there was no solution to their issue. Yet, after receiving this communication, there were no more duplicate ballot adjudications from that point forward. This seems to suggest that the help desk call set off a chain of events that resulted in the modification of configuration settings for the Election Management System.
- Since the help desk personnel were not on site, these configuration settings must have been modified by someone with remote access to the EMS. Remote access requires internet connectivity.
- Since there were no suspicious duplicate adjudications in the 2021 election, it appears that any script used to create and populate the new databases was updated to preclude such duplicate adjudications in the future.
- The Dominion help desk appears to operate more like a quality assurance team during software testing. They take bug reports and refer them to software engineers to update their script to remove the “bug”.
Statutory Violations
- The reports cite evidence of violations of the following federal statutes:
- 52 U.S. Code § 10307 prohibits any person acting under color of law to “…willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report…” the vote of any person entitled to vote.
- 52 U.S. Code § 10308(a) prescribes penalties for any person depriving or attempting to deprive any person of voting rights under Federal statute.
- 52 U.S. Code § 10308(c) prescribes penalties for conspiring to violate or interfere with secured voting rights.
- 52 U.S. Code § 20701 mandates the preservation of all election records for 22 months after an election for Federal offices.1,2
- 52 U.S. Code § 20702 prescribes penalties for theft, destruction, concealment, mutilation, or alteration of § 20701 election records.
- 52 U.S. Code § 21081 requires that voting systems used in elections for Federal office meet the standards of that section, including that the voting system shall produce a record with an audit capacity for such system, and that “the error rate of the voting system in counting ballots…shall comply with the error rate standards established under section 3.2.1 of…” the Federal Election Commission 2002 Voting System Standards (VSS).3
- The reports cite evidence of violations of the following CO state statutes:
- CRS §1-5-601.5 requires that voting systems and equipment in Colorado meet 2002 VSS standards, at minimum.
- CRS §1-7-802 requires the preservation of election records for 25 months after elections.
- CRS §1-13-111 prescribes penalties for destroying, removing, or delaying delivery of election records.
Record Anomalies
Ballot Records
- During the 2020 general election, 20,346 ballot records were “reloaded” into new election databases. 5,567 ballots in 58 batches were NOT reloaded in the new election database.
- During the 2021 municipal election in Grand Junction, 2,974 ballot records were “reloaded” in new election databases. Overall, 4,458 ballots in 46 batches were not reloaded in the the new election database.
Tabulation Rates
- The scanners used to read ballots in Mesa County, CO have a maximum capacity of 100 ballots/minute.
- According to election database records, the initial 10 batches containing a total of 941 ballots were processed through a single tabulator (Tabulator 10) in just 47 seconds.
- 941 ballots would take at least 9 minutes 41 seconds using the scanner
- This indicates that the ballot records added to the election database were not the result of the standard process of scanning a ballot. It would seem to indicate a direct insertion of ballot records into the election database. A direct insertion of ballot records corresponds to a direct manipulation of the vote tallies.
- In his analysis submitted in King v Whitmer, Russ Ramsland observed a similar anomaly across 4 counties in Michigan. Michigan election officials tabulated 384,733 votes in four precincts whose machinery could not possibly have counted more than 94,867 votes during that time. This indicates that as many as 289,866 ballots were cast in a fraudulent manner in Michigan.
Log Files
- The following log files were deleted by DVS vendor personnel from the May 23, 2021 configuration as a result of the updates made on May 26, 2021:
- Server Microsoft SQL Server Installation Log Files Missing
- Server Microsoft SQL Server Log Files Missing
- EMS Server Dell Server Updates Missing
- Server ‘Administrator’ WebCache Log Files Overwritten
- Server ’emsadmin’ WebCache Log Files Overwritten
- Server SQL Server Management Studio Log Files Overwritten
- Server CBS Log Files Overwritten
- Server Election Databases missing
- Server Event Logs Missing/Overwritten
- Server System Users are Missing
- Server Virtual Directories Log Files Missing
- Server Windows Defender Log Files Missing/Overwritten
- The deletion/overwriting of these log files adversely impact the ability to perform a full forensic audit in the wake of any election.
- The deletion of these records as a result of vendor maintenance activities is likely not isolated to Mesa County, CO. Clerks should be wary of any attempt by voting system vendors to “update” or “perform maintenance” on their systems without any oversight by technical experts they trust.
Influence Operations
Intimidation
- The CO Secretary of State sued to ensure that Tina Peters would not oversee the 2022 elections as the Mesa County, CO Clerk
- The FBI raided her home
- The Grand Junction police arrested her
Big Tech Bias
- Google “Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters” and you will not find any links to the actual reports or TinaPetersforColorado.com website where they can be found. All you will find is links to stories attempting to smear her character.
- Google “Mesa County Forensics Report” and you will not find any links to the actual reports or TinaPetersforColorado.com website where they can be found. All you will find is a smattering of stories designed to be dismissive.
CONCLUSION
The information provided as a results of the data obtained by Mesa County, CO Clerk Tina Peters provides grounds for the decertification of both the 2020 General Election in Mesa County and the 2021 Municipal Election in Grand Junction, CO.The anomalies observed in Mesa County, CO were similar to those observed elsewhere in the country during the 2020 general election and others. What is unique about Mesa County, CO is that Tina Peters was courageous enough to stand up to significant intimidation from federal authorities and the CO Secretary of State to perform her statutory duties regarding the preservation of the integrity of election records.
Tina Peters is a hero. She is now running to replace the current CO Secretary of State.
There should be an immediate injunction issued regarding the use of Dominion Voting Systems in future elections not simply in CO but also in other states featuring Dominion Voting Systems. The integrity of the voting systems provided by other manufacturers should be immediately reviewed with similar rigor and possibly result in an expanded injunction to include them as well.
Share This Info With Your Fellow Patriots
BOMBSHELL: Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Provides Evidence of Machine-Based Vote Manipulation - Lets Fix Stuff
By Patrick Colbeck I first met Tina Peters at Mike Lindell’s CyberSymposium in August 2021. At the symposium, I learned that she had taken an image of her Dominion Voting System Democracy Suite v5.11-CO Election Management System before (May 23, 2021) and after (May 26, 2021) Dominion personnel...
letsfixstuff.org
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Apparently not enough evidence to act yet! These articles just keep on coming while....the idiot in charge is destroying usBOMBSHELL: Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Provides Evidence of Machine-Based Vote Manipulation
By Patrick Colbeck
MAR 25, 2022
I first met Tina Peters at Mike Lindell’s CyberSymposium in August 2021. At the symposium, I learned that she had taken an image of her Dominion Voting System Democracy Suite v5.11-CO Election Management System before (May 23, 2021) and after (May 26, 2021) Dominion personnel came in to “service” her equipment. Frankly, this is the ONLY way any clerk could reasonably discern whether or not digital election fraud occurred on their watch.
In “appreciation” for her efforts to ensure the integrity of election records under her responsibility, she was indicted on 10 counts related to tampering with voting equipment. Her home was raided by the FBI. She has served time in jail.
We now know why authorities sought to make an example of her. By quietly capturing images of her election equipment before and after it was serviced by Dominion vendor personnel, she exposed that the the “servicing” resulted in the clear destruction of evidence that could be used in an audit of an election. Furthermore, she enabled a detailed forensic analysis of the electronic data from the 2020 general election. This detailed analysis has yielded clear evidence of the manipulation of election results.
The forensic reports are available for your review by clicking on each of the images below.
These reports are fairly technical in nature. My attempt to consolidate the observations found in these reports proceeds below.
Report #1 Report #2 Report #3 KEY FINDINGS KEY FINDINGS KEY FINDINGS Election records needed to support a post-election audit were deleted in violation of state and federal law Demonstrates Dominion Voting System vulnerabilities and the presence of non-certified software capable of changing election results without detection. 36 wireless devices were found in County EMS system in violation of law and certification requirements. Shows manipulation of votes. New election results databases were created during the middle of voting without any direction from clerks. Digital vote records were “reloaded” into new databases faster than any possible scan of ballots. Not all previous vote records were “reloaded”.
Process Anomalies
Security Vulnerabilities
- A password was not necessary to access the EMS server
- Testing confirmed that an outside party could use a separate computer as well as a cell phone, with publicly available and widely used free software (none of which were part of the DVS D-Suite), to easily change election results.
- Non-certified software (SQL Server Management Studio) was found to be installed with Dominion Voting Systems in Mesa County, CO and Antrim County, MI
- SQL Server Management Studio provides unauthorized users with “back door” access to election results databases. The addition of this software is not necessary to the election process and allows any party with access to the EMS server to alter cast ballots, tallies, databases, ballots, and audit records.
- 36 wireless devices were found installed
- The wireless device installations were found to have negligible firewall protections
- Wireless device encryption can be easily broken
- The EMS server motherboard was manufactured in China. Chinese motherboards feature a well known “back door” that provides unauthorized access to equipment.
Certification Violations
- Federal certification requirements:
- Per EAC Testing & Certification Program, August 11, 2021, Page 7 “wireless systems are disallowed”
- 2002 VSS, para 3.2.1 specifies “d. For central-county systems…: Consolidation of vote selection data from multiple counting devices to generate jurisdiction-wide vote counts, including storage and reporting of the consolidated vote data…a target error rate of no more than one in 10,000,000 ballot positions.” A ballot position is each and every choice (e.g. a “bubble” which can be marked or filled-in) on a ballot selectable by a voter to convey their voting choices.
- State certification requirements:
- The Federal Election Commission’s 2002 Voting System Standards are defined in CO state law as the mandatory minimum standard for certification of voting systems.
- Colorado state statute § 1-5-601.5., specifies that a voting system which “…provides access to incomplete election returns and interactive inquiries before the completion of the official count…shall:
- a. be designed to provide external access to incomplete election returns only if that access for these purposes is authorized by the statutes and regulations of the using agency…
- b. Use voting system software and its security environment designed such that data accessible to interactive queries resides in an external file, or database, that is created and maintained by the elections software under the restrictions applying to any other output report, namely, that:
- 1) The output file or database has no provision for write-access back to the system.
- 2) Persons whose only authorized access is to the file or database are denied write-access, both to the file or database, and to the system,” and states that the Standards are “intended to address…risks to the integrity of a voting system…,” including “…Changing calculated vote totals;…” and “Preventing access to vote data, including individual votes and vote totals, to unauthorized individuals;…”
- The reports obtained show clear violations of both the federal and state certification requirements
- Any election conducted using non-certified election equipment should be decertified
Election Privatization
- Contrary to popular conceptions, clerks and their staff have very little access to and oversight of key election processes managed by electronic voting systems
- During the 2020 general election in Mesa County, CO, there was an unauthorized creation of 2 new election databases after voting had already started (CO allows early voting)
- It is apparent that private entities, either manually or via an automated script, modified election records without direction from clerks
- The CO Secretary of State ordered the destruction of election records by private entities
- During the 2021 municipal election in Grand Junction, CO, there was also an unauthorized creation of 2 new election databases after voting had already started (CO allows early voting)
Help Desk
- After the new databases were created and reloaded, election workers noticed repeat adjudications of the same ballots and issues with ballots in process of being adjudicated
- When election workers called the Dominion help desk, they were told that there was no solution to their issue. Yet, after receiving this communication, there were no more duplicate ballot adjudications from that point forward. This seems to suggest that the help desk call set off a chain of events that resulted in the modification of configuration settings for the Election Management System.
- Since the help desk personnel were not on site, these configuration settings must have been modified by someone with remote access to the EMS. Remote access requires internet connectivity.
- Since there were no suspicious duplicate adjudications in the 2021 election, it appears that any script used to create and populate the new databases was updated to preclude such duplicate adjudications in the future.
- The Dominion help desk appears to operate more like a quality assurance team during software testing. They take bug reports and refer them to software engineers to update their script to remove the “bug”.
Statutory Violations
- The reports cite evidence of violations of the following federal statutes:
- 52 U.S. Code § 10307 prohibits any person acting under color of law to “…willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report…” the vote of any person entitled to vote.
- 52 U.S. Code § 10308(a) prescribes penalties for any person depriving or attempting to deprive any person of voting rights under Federal statute.
- 52 U.S. Code § 10308(c) prescribes penalties for conspiring to violate or interfere with secured voting rights.
- 52 U.S. Code § 20701 mandates the preservation of all election records for 22 months after an election for Federal offices.1,2
- 52 U.S. Code § 20702 prescribes penalties for theft, destruction, concealment, mutilation, or alteration of § 20701 election records.
- 52 U.S. Code § 21081 requires that voting systems used in elections for Federal office meet the standards of that section, including that the voting system shall produce a record with an audit capacity for such system, and that “the error rate of the voting system in counting ballots…shall comply with the error rate standards established under section 3.2.1 of…” the Federal Election Commission 2002 Voting System Standards (VSS).3
- The reports cite evidence of violations of the following CO state statutes:
- CRS §1-5-601.5 requires that voting systems and equipment in Colorado meet 2002 VSS standards, at minimum.
- CRS §1-7-802 requires the preservation of election records for 25 months after elections.
- CRS §1-13-111 prescribes penalties for destroying, removing, or delaying delivery of election records.
Record Anomalies
Ballot Records
- During the 2020 general election, 20,346 ballot records were “reloaded” into new election databases. 5,567 ballots in 58 batches were NOT reloaded in the new election database.
- During the 2021 municipal election in Grand Junction, 2,974 ballot records were “reloaded” in new election databases. Overall, 4,458 ballots in 46 batches were not reloaded in the the new election database.
Tabulation Rates
- The scanners used to read ballots in Mesa County, CO have a maximum capacity of 100 ballots/minute.
- According to election database records, the initial 10 batches containing a total of 941 ballots were processed through a single tabulator (Tabulator 10) in just 47 seconds.
- 941 ballots would take at least 9 minutes 41 seconds using the scanner
- This indicates that the ballot records added to the election database were not the result of the standard process of scanning a ballot. It would seem to indicate a direct insertion of ballot records into the election database. A direct insertion of ballot records corresponds to a direct manipulation of the vote tallies.
- In his analysis submitted in King v Whitmer, Russ Ramsland observed a similar anomaly across 4 counties in Michigan. Michigan election officials tabulated 384,733 votes in four precincts whose machinery could not possibly have counted more than 94,867 votes during that time. This indicates that as many as 289,866 ballots were cast in a fraudulent manner in Michigan.
Log Files
- The following log files were deleted by DVS vendor personnel from the May 23, 2021 configuration as a result of the updates made on May 26, 2021:
- Server Microsoft SQL Server Installation Log Files Missing
- Server Microsoft SQL Server Log Files Missing
- EMS Server Dell Server Updates Missing
- Server ‘Administrator’ WebCache Log Files Overwritten
- Server ’emsadmin’ WebCache Log Files Overwritten
- Server SQL Server Management Studio Log Files Overwritten
- Server CBS Log Files Overwritten
- Server Election Databases missing
- Server Event Logs Missing/Overwritten
- Server System Users are Missing
- Server Virtual Directories Log Files Missing
- Server Windows Defender Log Files Missing/Overwritten
- The deletion/overwriting of these log files adversely impact the ability to perform a full forensic audit in the wake of any election.
- The deletion of these records as a result of vendor maintenance activities is likely not isolated to Mesa County, CO. Clerks should be wary of any attempt by voting system vendors to “update” or “perform maintenance” on their systems without any oversight by technical experts they trust.
Influence Operations
Intimidation
- The CO Secretary of State sued to ensure that Tina Peters would not oversee the 2022 elections as the Mesa County, CO Clerk
- The FBI raided her home
- The Grand Junction police arrested her
Big Tech Bias
- Google “Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters” and you will not find any links to the actual reports or TinaPetersforColorado.com website where they can be found. All you will find is links to stories attempting to smear her character.
- Google “Mesa County Forensics Report” and you will not find any links to the actual reports or TinaPetersforColorado.com website where they can be found. All you will find is a smattering of stories designed to be dismissive.
CONCLUSION
The information provided as a results of the data obtained by Mesa County, CO Clerk Tina Peters provides grounds for the decertification of both the 2020 General Election in Mesa County and the 2021 Municipal Election in Grand Junction, CO.
The anomalies observed in Mesa County, CO were similar to those observed elsewhere in the country during the 2020 general election and others. What is unique about Mesa County, CO is that Tina Peters was courageous enough to stand up to significant intimidation from federal authorities and the CO Secretary of State to perform her statutory duties regarding the preservation of the integrity of election records.
Tina Peters is a hero. She is now running to replace the current CO Secretary of State.
There should be an immediate injunction issued regarding the use of Dominion Voting Systems in future elections not simply in CO but also in other states featuring Dominion Voting Systems. The integrity of the voting systems provided by other manufacturers should be immediately reviewed with similar rigor and possibly result in an expanded injunction to include them as well.
Share This Info With Your Fellow Patriots
BOMBSHELL: Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Provides Evidence of Machine-Based Vote Manipulation - Lets Fix Stuff
By Patrick Colbeck I first met Tina Peters at Mike Lindell’s CyberSymposium in August 2021. At the symposium, I learned that she had taken an image of her Dominion Voting System Democracy Suite v5.11-CO Election Management System before (May 23, 2021) and after (May 26, 2021) Dominion personnel...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 11,926
- Reaction score
- 19,286
Interestingly enough, RR was NOT named in the recent Trump lawsuit. You would think that if he were really one of the bad guys, Trump would have tossed his name into the mix....but he didn't.First up: A handpicked FBI counterintelligence team was going after the leakers in Congress beginning in April of 2017 when Sessions and RR formed it.
1.
Suspected Congressional Leakers Were Secretly Being Investigated by the DOJ All Along
Commentary Two prominent Democrat politicians who sit on the House Intelligence Committee have alerted the news media that ...
View attachment 251906
Hmmmm....
You have to live through it to believe it... you're ahead of the curve... there are so many that need to be red pilled.
Hunger is a good motivator....
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
I understand where you're coming from GH but we're approaching critical mass? Are you saying the nation needs to be starving and revolt on empty stomachs?
Hell, we could of thought that one up all on our own! No internet theorists like X22 or Redpill, no Q ball hopes and prayers, no BOOM articles....none of those would have been necessary. We just needed to wait until the nation is starving. Great plan for a movement that claims to 'have it all' (but everyone needs to be starving to see it).
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
too little too late. NH already does this!
Hadn't heard that name in awhile.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 2,161
- Reaction score
- 4,353
The State Of Arizona Just Passed Legislation That Would Require Americans To Provide Proof Of Citizenship To Vote
Notice the headline doesn't say proof of American citizenship is required to vote. It says only the Americans have to show proof. So it's either a case of a useless law, or another conservative site showing it's just as illiterate as the liberal sites.
I'm thinking that he means, that's what it'll take to get peoples attention long enough to possibly have some type of effect.
....or I could be totally off the mark.
Unfortunately, whether or not the effect it has is a net-positive effect or not, can't be known until afterwards.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"The Knitting While Weeping Circle" Report...
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
We'll all face the truth eventually Walt. We can also agree to disagree here. You can keep throwing out the insults and they'll just bounce right off bro.
If my opinions don't align with yours I'm sorry about that. It's not what I wish nor what I want, it's what I see. I see what I see and I call'em the way I see'em. That's why they're called opinions
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 21,849
- Reaction score
- 53,798
Events have most people's attention.
Prices are getting most people's attention.
Stickers show up on gas pumps.
Average people talking about the ds.
But people still want to "get back to normal".
Some are seeing that normal will never happen AND THAT IS WHAT WE NEED!
Is this designed to peak at a certain time, like before midterms when the majority are woke & those that refust to see are trampled?
Do we have that long?
Can we wait that long?
Will the people lose interest and go back to sleep?
Even us here are way ahead of the curve.............. but no one has taken any action?
Canada Truckers, Freedom Truckers, Austrailian Truckers have started.
What actions do you personally take besides post here and bitch where it is safe and you get likes like a fb tard?
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 8,059
- Reaction score
- 13,823
Dunno. Nothing like this has ever happened to us (in the USA) within this particular time in history. All of a sudden we're all in this incrediblely complex societal web that very few of us know how to deal with, mainly by the incredibly offsettingly devisive sexual and racial behavior by what appears to be major segments of society, even as we know it's small people in select positions of authority with an avatistic need to control everyone else for their profit. Of course, all they do is lie, hundreds of lies all of a sudden popping up everywhere and demanding you accept their deviant claims as truth, not for your benefit, but in order to discombobulate your sense of integrity and open you to their avarice.
What to do? First of all you do not give in to their claims. I was once instructed by a very wise man to "do the best you can in any situation you are in to maintain your integrity as a human being."
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Are we all tired of winning yet? How are those election fraud investigations progressing?
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 11,926
- Reaction score
- 19,286
I keep having to remind myself that a large % of the "opposition" party is being paid by the same people paying the Dems.
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2013
- Messages
- 11,926
- Reaction score
- 19,286
Brought to you by Murkowski and crew?
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
The only way to fix the stolen 2020 election. Everything else is simply more BS
Plenty.
I cannot get into details, but if everyone lived as I do, bankruptcy would be a foreign concept, the gov would have a $30T surplus instead of $30T in debt, gold would still be $20/oz and the federal reserve wouldn't have made it 6 Months.
....but I'm only one person trying to swim against the flow everyone else is all too eager to go along with.
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Well done!! You're not alone Joe
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Watch Colorado. More and more evidence is coming to light regarding election fraud in the State of Colorado. And the people being attacked for doing their jobs are heroes in my book. They have taken the far more difficult but harder right path.
t.me
March 28, 2022
Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, Tina Peters, has been in a tough, ongoing battle with state and federal officials over the 2020 election since she and an “unidentified man” made a backup copy of images from Dominion Voting Systems vote-counting equipment. Peters says she has done nothing wrong, and it was well within her scope of responsibilities to back up the election records. In fact, in an interview with Steve Bannon on March 22, Peters said that “the backup that she did was lawful and required by federal and state law. It has no PII or Personal Identifiable Information of voters.”
video
uncoverdc.com
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Watch Colorado. More and more evidence is coming to light regarding election fraud in the State of Colorado. And the people being attacked for doing their jobs are heroes in my book. They have taken the far more difficult but harder right path...
Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Says Backup was Lawful and Required
By Wendi Strauch MahoneyMarch 28, 2022
Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, Tina Peters, has been in a tough, ongoing battle with state and federal officials over the 2020 election since she and an “unidentified man” made a backup copy of images from Dominion Voting Systems vote-counting equipment. Peters says she has done nothing wrong, and it was well within her scope of responsibilities to back up the election records. In fact, in an interview with Steve Bannon on March 22, Peters said that “the backup that she did was lawful and required by federal and state law. It has no PII or Personal Identifiable Information of voters.”
video
Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Says Backup was Lawful and Required - UncoverDC
Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters says the backup of Dominion Voting Systems equipment was lawful and required.
uncoverdc.com
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2010
- Messages
- 12,172
- Reaction score
- 27,891
We just have to vote harder next time to overcome the fraud....
Hopefully Sipher takes a long walk off a short pier, with cement shoes.
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Nearly 18 months now and counting
FEC Fines DNC and Hillary Clinton For Lying About Funding of Debunked Russia Dossier
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about funding the fake Russia dossier.Recall, Hillary Clinton’s camp and the DNC were hit with two lawsuits back in 2017 and 2018.
An FEC complaint was filed in October 2017 against the Clinton campaign and the DNC for violating campaign finance law because they failed to disclose payments for the Russian Dossier.
In 2018, Hillary Clinton and the DNC were accused of using state chapters as strawmen to launder $84 million in an effort to evade campaign donation limits and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing this corruption.
TRENDING: Steve Bannon DESTROYS Bill Barr: “We Don’t Care About Your Opinions – You’re a Stone-Cold Liar and We Got You on Two Massive Lies” (VIDEO)
The FEC fined Clinton and said her campaign violated the rules because they failed to disclose payments funneled to Fusion GPS through DNC law firm Perkins Coie.
The Washington Examiner reported:
"The Federal Election Commission has fined the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about the funding of the infamous, and discredited, Russian “dossier” used in a smear attempt against Donald Trump weeks before he shocked the world with his 2016 presidential victory.
The election agency said that Clinton and the DNC violated strict rules on describing expenditures of payments funneled to the opposition research firm Fusion GPS through their law firm.
A combined $1,024,407.97 was paid by the treasurers of the DNC and Clinton campaign to law firm Perkins Coie for Fusion GPS’s information, and the party and campaign hid the reason, claiming it was for legal services, not opposition research.
Instead, the DNC’s $849,407.97 and the Clinton campaign’s $175,000 covered Fusion GPS’s opposition research on the dossier, a basis for the so-called “Russia hoax” that dogged Trump’s first term.
The memo said that the Clinton campaign and DNC argued that they were correct in describing their payment as for “legal advice and services” because it was Perkins Coie that hired Fusion GPS. But the agency said the law is clear and was violated.
It added that neither the campaign nor the party conceded to lying but won’t contest the finding. “Solely for the purpose of settling this matter expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs, respondent does not concede, but will not further contest the commission’s finding of probable cause to proceed” with the probe, said the FEC.
The FEC, in a memo to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, which filed its complaint over three years ago, said it fined Clinton’s treasurer $8,000 and the DNC’s treasurer $105,000.
The memo, shared with Secrets, is to be made public in a month."
FEC Fines DNC and Hillary Clinton For Lying About Funding of Debunked Russia Dossier
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about funding the fake Russia dossier. Recall, Hillary Clinton’s camp and the DNC were hit with two lawsuits back in 2017 and 2018. An FEC complaint was filed in October 2017 against the Clinton...
foxmetronews.com
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 389
- Reaction score
- 1,041
I wonder if they can repurpose some of that $1,024,407.97 to pay the $113,000 in fines, Whatever will they do about that crippling financial hit????FEC Fines DNC and Hillary Clinton For Lying About Funding of Debunked Russia Dossier
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about funding the fake Russia dossier.
Recall, Hillary Clinton’s camp and the DNC were hit with two lawsuits back in 2017 and 2018.
An FEC complaint was filed in October 2017 against the Clinton campaign and the DNC for violating campaign finance law because they failed to disclose payments for the Russian Dossier.
In 2018, Hillary Clinton and the DNC were accused of using state chapters as strawmen to launder $84 million in an effort to evade campaign donation limits and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing this corruption.
TRENDING: Steve Bannon DESTROYS Bill Barr: “We Don’t Care About Your Opinions – You’re a Stone-Cold Liar and We Got You on Two Massive Lies” (VIDEO)
The FEC fined Clinton and said her campaign violated the rules because they failed to disclose payments funneled to Fusion GPS through DNC law firm Perkins Coie.
The Washington Examiner reported:
"The Federal Election Commission has fined the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about the funding of the infamous, and discredited, Russian “dossier” used in a smear attempt against Donald Trump weeks before he shocked the world with his 2016 presidential victory.The election agency said that Clinton and the DNC violated strict rules on describing expenditures of payments funneled to the opposition research firm Fusion GPS through their law firm.A combined $1,024,407.97 was paid by the treasurers of the DNC and Clinton campaign to law firm Perkins Coie for Fusion GPS’s information, and the party and campaign hid the reason, claiming it was for legal services, not opposition research.Instead, the DNC’s $849,407.97 and the Clinton campaign’s $175,000 covered Fusion GPS’s opposition research on the dossier, a basis for the so-called “Russia hoax” that dogged Trump’s first term.The memo said that the Clinton campaign and DNC argued that they were correct in describing their payment as for “legal advice and services” because it was Perkins Coie that hired Fusion GPS. But the agency said the law is clear and was violated.It added that neither the campaign nor the party conceded to lying but won’t contest the finding. “Solely for the purpose of settling this matter expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs, respondent does not concede, but will not further contest the commission’s finding of probable cause to proceed” with the probe, said the FEC.The FEC, in a memo to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, which filed its complaint over three years ago, said it fined Clinton’s treasurer $8,000 and the DNC’s treasurer $105,000.The memo, shared with Secrets, is to be made public in a month."
FEC Fines DNC and Hillary Clinton For Lying About Funding of Debunked Russia Dossier
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for lying about funding the fake Russia dossier. Recall, Hillary Clinton’s camp and the DNC were hit with two lawsuits back in 2017 and 2018. An FEC complaint was filed in October 2017 against the Clinton...
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 83,250
- Reaction score
- 184,164
Any updates? Arrests? Anything??
