• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

707-HP Dodge Charger Hellcat gets roasted by a Ford GT40

Scorpio

Скорпион
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
24,729
Likes
27,709
#1
707-HP Dodge Charger Hellcat gets roasted by a Ford GT40

The Drive
James Gilboy 2 days ago




The Ford GT40 was, if you don't already know the story, Ford Motor Company's response to the last minute withdrawal by Enzo Ferrari, who had been in talks to sell his boutique car company to the American giant. When Enzo backed out, Henry Ford II wrote a blank check to a Texan by the name of Carroll Shelby, with the only goal being to beat Ferrari at Le Mans. It took a few years, but in the end, Ford's GT40 took four consecutive wins at Le Mans, between 1966 and 1969. While the original cars are all priceless and are, for the most part, sitting in collections stored away in warehouses, the much cheaper replicas, almost as good as the originals, are often raced like they should be.

Research





Drag and street racing YouTube channel 1320video has uploaded a video of a Superformance replica GT40 being raced at a half mile drag strip event, where it faced a Volkswagen Golf R, a Dodge Charger Hellcat, a Ford Mustang, and even a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-14, beating all but the bike by a country mile, and with only 450 naturally-aspirated horsepower available. What makes a car with two-thirds the power able to spank a Dodge Charger Hellcat like this? Two factors: lightness and aerodynamics.


© 1320video on YouTube

A GT40 weighs just under 2,700 pounds, whereas a Dodge Charger Hellcat comes in at 4,575 pounds. Thus, the GT40 has one horsepower for approximately six pounds of weight, whereas the Hellcat comes in at more than six and a half pounds per horse. The Charger's drag coefficient is 0.35, while the GT40's is 0.39, which is worse, but some of the GT40's advantage comes from its weight distribution.

This setup allowed it to use full power much earlier in the run than the Hellcat, which likely had to wait until third gear or higher before the driver's foot could be planted on the floor. The moral of the story? Don't assume that a race car is slow just because it's old. Chances are any car that has won Le Mans is more than fast enough to thrill in any era of history. Even if it is a replica.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enth...ellcat-gets-roasted-by-a-ford-gt40/ar-BBD2Zdd
 

Irons

Deep Sixed
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
25,455
Likes
37,984
#2
Horsepower to weight ratio is why some motorcycles are so freaking eye bleeding fast. I had one, a V65 Sabre. The six cylinder Honda CBX was another.

 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,021
Likes
5,965
#3
The Challenger is a pig. Regardless, A/S and A/SS are still the exclusive territory of Hemi Mopars!
 

vichris

Seeker
Seeker
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
197
Likes
157
Location
In a van down by the Rio Grande river
#4
I seem to do alright in my built Challenger......and the Mean Green Machine is not a Hellcat. Oh and BTW......... the video was of a hellcat CHARGER not a CHALLENGER.



FB_IMG_1482437582682.jpg
2017-02-03 08.43.02.jpg
20160425_154814.jpg
IMG_0979-001.JPG
IMG_1182-001.JPG
2017-02-10 21.17.54.jpg
IMG_0980-001.JPG
 
Last edited: