• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Bathroom Wars’ Goal: Humiliate the American Normal Majority

Twisted

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
141
Likes
153
#81

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
#82
Can they force us to accept?
PastorDowell


Published on Jun 13, 2016
What sayeth you?
 

andial

use default title
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
10,485
Likes
10,768
#83
Can't talk about this now still in mourning over that LBGTV4WD nightclub plane bombing in Florida by that algayda terrorist.
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,433
Likes
4,442
Location
right here right now
#84
It's all about dividing us. The cretins who are bringing this to us are more interested in dividing us then anything doing with our sexuality. Again, as long as they can keep us fighting each other, they will continue to easily rape us financially.
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
#89
North Carolina Senate REJECTS repeal of controversial 'bathroom bill' - leaving transgender people banned from using the toilet of their choice
  • North Carolina's Senate on Wednesday voted against repeal of a law that restricts transgender restroom access
  • The legislation to repeal the law, known as House Bill 2 (HB2), was defeated by a vote of 32-16, leaving the bathroom restrictions in place statewide
  • Legislators had called a special session to consider scrapping the law
  • HB2 passed in March and made North Carolina the first state to bar transgender people from using public restrooms that match their gender identity
  • National backlash was swift and fierce, leading to boycotts that have been blamed for millions of dollars in economic losses for the state


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4057104/North-Carolina-Senate-rejects-repeal-transgender-bathroom-law.html#ixzz4TYgVDRL5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
#92
Finally some sanity.......................

Trump SCRAPS Obama's transgender bathroom rules: Order which told public schools to let trans students use the bathroom of their gender identity or risk their funding is axed
  • The Trump administration lifted the federal guidelines on Wednesday
  • Guidelines had allowed transgender students to use public school bathrooms matching their chosen gender identity
  • Trump's decision is a reversal of the Obama-era directive issued in May last year
  • It will now be up to states and school districts to interpret whether federal sex discrimination law applies to gender identity
  • Education department sent a letter home nationwide on Wednesday saying earlier directive caused confusion and lawsuits over how to be applied


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4249982/Source-Administration-lift-transgender-bathroom-guidance.html#ixzz4ZT025QFO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

Aurumag

Dimly lit. Highly reflective
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
7,636
Likes
7,967
Location
State of Jefferson
#93
Such a simple solution with only three options:

1. Men - bathrooms remain unchanged

2. Women - bathrooms remain unchanged

3. Other - single occupancy pay toilet/ port-a-potty (tokens can be provided by schools or private donations)
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
31,085
Likes
38,707
Location
Planet Earth
#94
Been seeing trannys on TV of late.

They're trying to make it seem normal.

I refuse to watch it.
 

arminius

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
3,433
Likes
4,442
Location
right here right now
#97
science instead of social justice?

Pahh Too basic, too oriented to rationality rather than emotionality, too dispassionate, too friggin sexless.

no fun atol.

snip

yeaha, we do live in interesting times. no?
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
#98
Who would have thought it would get to this?
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
#99
North Carolina's controversial 'bathroom bill' will cost the state $3.7BILLION if businesses and the entertainment industry continue to boycott, report finds
  • New reports show North Carolina's controversial 'bathroom bill,' or HB2, will cost the state neary $4 billion in lost business by 2028
  • The lost wages come from a number of business deals and performances that have backed out since the bill was signed
  • One such deal includes a PayPal facility which would have added $2.66 billion


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4352182/Bathroom-bill-cost-North-Carolina-3-76B.html#ixzz4cXv36dCs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
Lawmakers vote to repeal North Carolina's controversial 'bathroom bill' which prompted major corporations, performers and sports leagues to boycott the state
  • North Carolina lawmakers have voted to repeal and replace the 'bathroom bill'
  • Rights activists warn the new measure fails to assure state-wide protections
  • Now heading to the state's Democratic Governor, who is expected to sign it
  • Controversial bill restricted transgender people's use of bathrooms


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4363650/US-state-reaches-deal-repeal-transgender-bathroom-law.html#ixzz4cqmzYkGC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
154,187
Likes
40,798
Education Department says it won't act on transgender students' complaints about bathroom access
  • The Department of Education will not take action if transgender students make bathroom access complaints
  • BuzzFeed News pinned down the Trump administration's position after, for months, the DOE said it was studying the issue
  • Now a spokewoman for the department says that Title XI protections, which are on the basis of sex, don't apply to gender identity in regards to bathrooms


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5383317/DOE-wont-act-transgender-students-bathroom-complaints.html#ixzz56zC72SCh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

Alton

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,991
Likes
5,080
Location
Michiana
Ask the feminazis...

How radical feminism ruined lives
Mallory Millett
Frontpage Magazine
Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:29 UTC

The horror I witnessed inside the women's "liberation" movement.

"When women go wrong men go right after them."
-- Mae West


"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.

During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, "Why?" She answered, "That means you'll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!"

What a giggle we girls had over that. "How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are," we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.

Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, "Come to New York. We're making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it."

I hadn't seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.

And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, "Sexual Politics."

It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a "consciousness-raising-group," a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:

"Why are we here today?" she asked.
"To make revolution," they answered.
"What kind of revolution?" she replied.
"The Cultural Revolution," they chanted.
"And how do we make Cultural Revolution?" she demanded.
"By destroying the American family!" they answered.
"How do we destroy the family?" she came back.
"By destroying the American Patriarch," they cried exuberantly.
"And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?" she replied.
"By taking away his power!"
"How do we do that?"
"By destroying monogamy!" they shouted.
"How can we destroy monogamy?"

Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?

"By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!" they resounded.

They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was "to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with 'The Revolution'": The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.

It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.

To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn't care what anyone thought because they just hadn't seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.

How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists -- I'd conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.

How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable -- clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt -- plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?

I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building. I continued with my new life in New York while my sister became famous publishing her books, featured on the cover of "Time Magazine." "Time" called her "the Karl Marx of the Women's Movement." This was because her book laid out a course in Marxism 101 for women. Her thesis: The family is a den of slavery with the man as the Bourgeoisie and the woman and children as the Proletariat. The only hope for women's "liberation" (communism's favorite word for leading minions into inextricable slavery; "liberation," and much like "collective" - please run from it, run for your life) was this new "Women's Movement." Her books captivated the academic classes and soon "Women's Studies" courses were installed in colleges in a steady wave across the nation with Kate Millett books as required reading.

Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and there's a class called "Women's Studies." "Hmmm, this could be interesting," says Mom. "Maybe you could get something out of this."

Seems innocuous to her. How could she suspect this is a class in which her innocent daughter will be taught that her father is a villain? Her mother is a fool who allowed a man to enslave her into barbaric practices like monogamy and family life and motherhood, which is a waste of her talents. She mustn't follow in her mother's footsteps. That would be submitting to life as a mindless drone for some domineering man, the oppressor, who has mesmerized her with tricks like romantic love. Never be lured into this chicanery, she will be taught. Although men are no damned good, she should use them for her own orgasmic gratification; sleep with as many men as possible in order to keep herself unattached and free. There's hardly a seventeen-year-old girl without a grudge from high school against a Jimmy or Jason who broke her heart. Boys are learning, too, and they can be careless during high school, that torment of courting dances for both sexes.

By the time Women's Studies professors finish with your daughter, she will be a shell of the innocent girl you knew, who's soon convinced that although she should be flopping down with every boy she fancies, she should not, by any means, get pregnant. And so, as a practitioner of promiscuity, she becomes a wizard of prevention techniques, especially abortion.

The goal of Women's Liberation is to wear each female down to losing all empathy for boys, men or babies. The tenderest aspects of her soul are roughened into a rock pile of cynicism, where she will think nothing of murdering her baby in the warm protective nest of her little-girl womb. She will be taught that she, in order to free herself, must become an outlaw. This is only reasonable because all Western law, since Magna Carta and even before, is a concoction of the evil white man whose true purpose is to press her into slavery.

Be an outlaw! Rebel! Be defiant! (Think Madonna, Lady Gaga, Lois Lerner, Elizabeth Warren.) "All women are prostitutes," she will be told. You're either really smart and use sex by being promiscuous for your own pleasures and development as a full free human being "just like men" or you can be a professional prostitute, a viable business for women, which is "empowering" or you can be duped like your mother and prostitute yourself to one man exclusively whereby you fall under the heavy thumb of "the oppressor." All wives are just "one-man whores."

She is to be heartless in this. No sentimental stuff about courting. No empathy for either boy or baby. She has a life to live and no one is to get in her way. And if the boy or man doesn't "get it" then no sex for him; "making love" becomes "having sex." "I'm not 'having sex' with any jerk who doesn't believe I can kill his son or daughter at my whim. He has no say in it because it's my body!" (Strange logic as who has ever heard of a body with two heads, two hearts, four arms, four feet?)

There's no end to the absurdities your young girl will be convinced to swallow. "I plan to leap from guy to guy as much as I please and no one can stop me because I'm liberated!" In other words, these people will turn your daughter into a slut with my sister's books as instruction manuals. ("Slut is a good word. Be proud of it!") She'll be telling you, "I'm probably never getting married and if I do it will be after I've established my career," which nowadays often means never. "I'll keep my own name and I don't really want kids. They're such a bother and only get in the way." They'll tell her, "Don't let any guy degrade you by allowing him to open doors for you. To be called 'a lady' is an insult. Chivalry is a means of ownership."

Thus, the females, who are fundamentally the arbiters of society go on to harden their young men with such pillow-talk in the same way they've been hardened because, "Wow, man, I've gotta get laid and she won't do it if I don't agree to let her kill the kid if she gets knocked-up!" Oppressed? Woman has always had power. Consider the eternal paradigm: only after Eve convinced Adam to eat the fruit did mankind fall. I.e., man does anything to make woman happy, even if it's in defiance of God. There's power for ya! Without a decent womankind, mankind is lost. As Mae West said, "When women go wrong men go right after them!"

I've known women who fell for this creed in their youth who now, in their fifties and sixties, cry themselves to sleep decades of countless nights grieving for the children they'll never have and the ones they coldly murdered because they were protecting the empty loveless futures they now live with no way of going back. "Where are my children? Where are my grandchildren?" they cry to me.

"Your sister's books destroyed my sister's life!" I've heard numerous times. "She was happily married with four kids and after she read those books, walked out on a bewildered man and didn't look back." The man fell into despairing rack and ruin. The children were stunted, set off their tracks, deeply harmed; the family profoundly dislocated and there was "no putting Humpty-Dumpty together again."

Throughout the same time these women were "invading" our institutions, the character of the American woman transformed drastically from models portrayed for us by Rosalind Russell, Bette Davis, Deborah Kerr, Eve Arden, Donna Reed, Barbara Stanwyck, Claudette Colbert, Irene Dunn, Greer Garson. These were outstanding women needing no empowerment lessons and whose own personalities, as well as the characters they interpreted, were strong, resilient and clearly carved. Their voices were so different you could pick them out by that alone. We all knew Rita Hayworth's voice. We all knew Katherine Hepburn's voice.

I dare you to identify the voices of the cookie-cutter post-women's-liberation types from Hollywood today. How did these "liberated" women fall into such an indistinguishable pile of mush? They all look exactly the same with few individuating characteristics and their voices sound identical, these Julies and Jessicas! My friend, Father George Rutler, calls them "the chirping fledglings of the new Dark Ages." The character of the American woman has been distorted by this pernicious movement. From where did this foul mouthed, tattooed, outlaw creature, who murders her baby without blinking an eye and goes partying without conscience or remorse come? And, in such a short little phase in history?

Never before have we heard of so many women murdering their children: Casey Anthony killing her little Caylee and partying-hearty for weeks; Susan Smith driving her beautiful little boys into a lake, leaving them strapped in the water to die torturous deaths; that woman who drowned her five children in the bathtub? "Hey, if I can kill my baby at six months of gestation why not six months post-birth, just call it late late-term abortion."

I insist that woman always has been the arbiter of society and when those women at Lila Karp's table in Greenwich Village set their minds to destroying the American Family by talking young women into being outlaws, perpetrators of infanticide, and haters of Western law, men and marriage, they accomplished just what they intended. Their desire -- and I witnessed it at subsequent meetings till I got pretty sick of their unbridled hate -- was to tear American society apart along with the family and the "Patriarchal Slave-Master," the American husband.

We're all so busy congratulating each other because Ronald Reagan "won the Cold War without firing a shot" entirely missing the bare truth which is that Mao, with his Little Red Book and the Soviets, won the Cold War without firing a shot by taking over our women, our young and the minds of everyone tutored by Noam Chomsky and the textbooks of Howard Zinn. Post-graduate Junior is Peter Pan trapped in the Never Neverland of Mom's (she's divorced now) basement. Christina Hoff Sommers says, "Moms and dads, be afraid for your sons. There's a 'war on men' that started a long time ago in gender studies classes and in women's advocacy groups eager to believe that men are toxic... Many 'educated women' in the U.S. have drunk from the gender feminist Kool Aid. Girls at Yale, Haverford and Swarthmore see themselves as oppressed. This is madness."

If you see something traitorous in this, a betrayal of my sister, I have come to identify with such people as Svetlana Stalin or Juanita Castro; coming out to speak plainly about a particularly harmful member of my family. Loyalty can be highly destructive. What about Muslims who refuse to speak out right now? I was one of the silent but at last I'm "spilling the beans." The girls have been up to something for years and it's really not good. It's evil. We should be sick to our souls over it. I know I am. And so, mass destruction, the inevitable outcome of all socialist/communist experiments, leaves behind its signature trail of wreckage.

So much grace, femininity and beauty lost.

So many ruined lives.