• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
248
Reaction score
283
Location
Pa.
Before Thanksgiving the CDC had actually separated the deaths where covid was the likely only cause of death in contrast with those who died and tested positive with covid.

They may still separate those two classifications. From what I recall the number was something like 4% of those people who are included as dying from covid as actually dying exclusively from covid.

Part of that problem was the fact that the deaths with covid were being inflated due to the false PCB tests. The NIH or the CDC corrected the number of cycles that were being used to determine positive or negative covid in early January of this year. That's the reason that we're seeing falling numbers of covid cases is partly because many people have had it and therefore do not get it again, and also that they change the criterion for testing positive through the test. There are multiples fewer persons testing positive then what had been under the previous criterion. there had been a post about a week ago titled the real reason the covid numbers are falling.
Looks like verify might be what you're looking for.

 

Jodster

Always wrong
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,193
Reaction score
1,156
The fact it’s so hard to find tells me that something stinks about the reporting structure
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
248
Reaction score
283
Location
Pa.
They may still separate those two classifications. From what I recall the number was something like 4% of those people who are included as dying from covid as actually dying exclusively from covid.
It was 6% after rereading the article. In the previous post there is a link to the CBS article on verify. But verify has its own website I believe.

There is no doubt that there is inconsistencies in reporting deaths by covid. The tests were scaled to report greatest number of possible covid cases, Plus persons died with symptoms of covid were counted as covid death.

That's where the CDC had claimed on October 10th that 6% of the deaths attributed to covid were actually caused relatively exclusively by covid. That is from the CDC website itself.
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
248
Reaction score
283
Location
Pa.
But there is also little doubt in my mind that there is a debilitating flu/virus of a severe type. There are several members of this board who can testify to that. It's not just a two to three day flu for some people. Some people get put down for a month or two even cases of 6 months. And yes I believe there are deaths truly caused by the virus or flu.
 

Joe King

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
11,742
Reaction score
14,455
Location
Instant Gratification Land
It's not just a two to three day flu for some people. Some people get put down for a month or two even cases of 6 months.
Yep. In my search for info about people catching it a second time, I read about a lady who first got sick early last year and still has a fever over 100F and still tests positive. That would certainly suck.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
There is no doubt that there is inconsistencies in reporting deaths by covid. The tests were scaled to report greatest number of possible covid cases, Plus persons died with symptoms of covid were counted as covid death.
Because there was a disgusting political agenda afoot.

Anyone believes this sordid affair just 'happened' out of the blue needs to reexamine their sources.

No one here I'm sure, but there are those who suck the MSM teat for their information.
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,454
Reaction score
30,290
If it was man made......... don't you think spot testing was done a few years in advance (just a bad flu year) to get the desired results and extrapolate out the numbers after that? That way they knew where to spread it, how much and how often.

Then if you believe that you know it will never go away & be used to jab you over and over and over.

There is a 7 day solution to all of this. Simply stop them like the raid slogan........... if your old enough to remember that.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,172
Reaction score
8,901
One of my wife's nieces, with her husband and son, are living in Italy. The son brought Covid back from school. All 3 got sick at the same time. Son & Dad got better quickly, but Mom is weak with splitting headaches. They are under forced "at home quarantine" for 28 days. The doctors only prescribed Tylenol. Some acquaintances drop off food at their door.
My wife - on the phone - told them about Ivermectin and Azithromicin... and we hope that their doctor will prescribe it for them. But if it's like in France, doctors are forbidden to prescribe anything except Tylenol for Covid....

Around the world, people are getting royally screwed by their "elected officials"...
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

Physician: Informed Consent For COVID Vaccine Requires Full Disclosure Of Risk & Liability, And Here It Is…​

informed-consent-777x437.png

POSTED BY: DR. COLLEEN HUBER, NMD
MARCH 18, 2021

Note: Most of the links below are from medical journals, the FDA, CDC, and other entities that generally support vaccination, yet the information in this article shows how EXTREMELY RISKY the COVID-19 vaccines are.

In my family, we have a rule: If you consider having an experimental medical procedure done,

  1. Don’t even think of insisting that anyone else have it done, inside or outside the family, because they control their own bodies and health decisions, not you; and
  2. Be sure you have read about and can explain in your own words all of the known risks of that procedure before embarking on it. Also, consider potential future risks.
I ask that you, the reader, at least take time to consider the above, and at least consider reading information in the links below, before submitting to this experimental medical procedure.

Is the COVID vaccine experimental? Pfizer and Moderna make the COVID-19 vaccines in the US. The FDA granted “emergency use authorization” for these vaccines (herein “COVID injections,” because they are unlike conventional vaccines). Emergency use authorization is required by law to be made only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19.

  • But are there effective COVID-19 treatments? – 100s of studies done around the world have established, and repeatedly confirmed, fast, effective, well-tolerated treatments for COVID-19 that are in widespread use. I briefly summarize them here.
  • General risk vs benefit – An emergency experimental vaccine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate, such as COVID-19. The average survival rate for NO COVID treatment at all is 99.74%, and we have very successful treatments available, which should easily achieve universal survivability from COVID, if widely available. Where does 99.74% survival come from? Dr. John Ioannidis is the most widely cited scientist in the world. His estimate in June 2020 of a 0.26% infection fatality rate is now confirmed around the world. 100% – 0.26% = 99.74% average survival rate.
Does the COVID injection work? The COVID injection is not even known to stop the spread of COVID. Dr. Larry Corey, who oversees National Institutes of Health COVID-19 vaccine trials said on 11/20/20: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.” https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388

What happened to the animals in the studies? This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done, all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure. There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology. No experimental coronavirus vaccine has succeeded in animal studies. In this study, coronavirus vaccine caused liver inflammation in test animals.

Specific risks of COVID injections, in roughly chronological order of side-effect manifestation:

  • Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the ingredients. This has been correlated with anaphylactic shock. So the CDC is now recommending intubation kits at vaccination sites.
  • Cationic lipid coating of mRNA is known for many years to be toxic, because these (+) charged fats interact with the (–) charges on our amino acids, our cell membranes and the phosphates of our DNA. Cationic lipids are attracted to and are destructive toward:
  • mRNA: Unlike a traditional vaccine, of injected, inactivated virus intended to stimulate antibody response, the COVID injection on the other hand is completely different in this respect. It uses messenger RNA (mRNA), which is a blueprint for your cells to create COVID-like (spike) proteins. Then your cells begin to make these COVID-like proteins. However, those proteins, in turn, stimulate your body to make antibodies against them. So now your body has been turned into a munitions factory for both sides of a war: The bad guys (COVID-like spike proteins) and the good guys (the antibodies fighting against them). However, before you pledge allegiance to the good guys, as you will see below, the good guys can be more lethal to the vaccinated person.
  • History of mRNA injections: This technology had disastrous results in dengue fever vaccines in the past. Dengue vaccine is a mRNA vaccine. When this was used in children in the Philippines, many vaccinated children had far worse outcomes than unvaccinated children when they were later exposed to dengue, and many died. Prosecution for homicide resulted. However, this had previously been known to happen with ferrets and with cats. In all cases, the vaccinated animal or human became more vulnerable to worse disease when confronted with it. It is expected that the relatively mild COVID-19 illness, with a survival rate of 99.74%, may reduce to a much lower survival rate and become a truly lethal disease in vaccinated people when they later become infected with it. There are no peer-reviewed published human trials of mRNA vaccines at all, and no mRNA vaccine has ever been FDA approved. That’s how new the technology is.
  • mRNA can affect DNA. One of the most worrisome risks with a mRNA vaccine is what can happen with reverse transcriptase. This is an enzyme in every cell, and it can theoretically lead to the mRNA creating changes in the cells’ DNA, a process known as viral retro-integration. Although this possibility had been thought unlikely, MIT and Harvard scientists found it happened here. If some of the 30 trillion or so cells in your body become permanent COVID factories, what is the long-term impact on your health, and would you want that outcome?
  • Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) problem: Prior attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine killed all the test animals, after they were later infected with wild virus. Here’s what happened: mRNA instructed the mammals’ cells to produce the spike proteins of the coronavirus. Then, later, when the animals confronted the wild virus, the intense build-up of antibodies had been stockpiled, and their sudden and overwhelming release killed the test animal. These risks have been documented in Nature, Science and Journal of Infectious Diseases. Here’s a study from Nature on that.
  • ADE mechanism: ADE is a form of pathogenic priming, meaning the vaccine can result in a more severe disease, which has been seen in prior attempts at making coronavirus vaccines. The antibodies made can be neutralizing (which inactivate a virus, and that’s good), but antibodies are a problem when they are non-neutralizing, because then these antibodies carry active viruses directly to macrophages, which then become infected. This is how ADE happens.
This antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) leads to:

  • increased viral replication (more viruses to make you sick); and
  • more severe disease
  • ADE result: These macrophages tend to go to the lungs and fill the lungs, causing overwhelming inflammation and airway obstruction (as found later on autopsy). However, the augmented antibodies also attack similar-looking proteins on internal organs, resulting in cytokine storm and death or auto-immune disease and organ failure. “Cats that showed high titers following vaccination succumbed at later timepoints to fatal disease.”
  • What about miscarriages, and why have men been advised to freeze their sperm prior to getting the injection? Both men and women are at risk for possibly permanent infertility, because the spike protein of a coronavirus “looks” to the immune system similar to Syncytin-1, an essential protein in the placenta. This stimulates antibodies to fight the placenta, and possibly sperm. Mid-term miscarriages, which are normally very rare, have occurred in women who have been vaccinated for COVID. SARS-CoV-2 viral particles have been found to linger in the testicles of men after recovery from infection.
  • Why are COVID vaccinees MORE likely to spread COVID than the unvaccinated? Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, who worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recently warned the World Health Organization (WHO) that “We are currently turning vaccinees into carriers shedding infectious variants.”
  • Why is it more dangerous to vaccinate against COVID-19 than other viruses? Because COVID-19 virus uses the ACE-2 receptor to get into your endothelial cells, including those lining the blood vessels. This creates an inflammatory reaction that the great majority (99.74%) have survived even without treatment, and even more who used known, effective treatments. (See page 1) So if you have been exposed to the virus, and then get vaccinated, it is almost certain that the vaccine will cause new inflammation and damage to endothelial cells lining your blood vessels, and we have seen short-term abnormal blood clotting in people who have gotten the vaccine. But the more likely problem is launching new disease in the blood vessels. Dr. H Noorchashm MD, PhD says, “. . . the vaccine is almost certain to do damage to the vascular endothelium.” He explains here.
Israel is at this writing the most heavily COVID-vaccinated country in the world. The findings of infectious disease experts are reported here, in which they determined, from the Israeli data, that the COVID injection causes:

” . . .mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly . . .”
How to protect yourself and your family

  • Always read the Product Package Insert. This is required by law to be included with packaging of all vaccines, and US Informed Consent law protects your right to be fully informed prior to any medical procedure, and your right to reject any medical procedure. 45 CFR § 46.116. These are universal principles enshrined in the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Here is the Pfizer insert, and here is Moderna’s. I strongly recommend reading ALL of it carefully with your family before you make a decision regarding whether to have the COVID injection.
  • Discuss the considerations above, as well as other information you have heard about the COVID injection in a relaxed, unhurried setting with your loved ones. Make sure that you are not pressured into a procedure that you may regret in the future. If you choose to defer or reject the COVID injection, know that you are not alone, and many healthcare workers have done the same. “I’ve heard Tuskegee more times than I can count in the last month – and, you know, it’s a valid, valid concern.” Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, a hospital chief clinical officer.
  • Share this page with others who are also considering the vaccine.
  • If your employer or school attempts mandatory vaccination, show this information to them. Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination, such as the COVID injection, that is under EUA (explained above). You should also consult your attorney to look into state and federal law prohibiting forced medical procedures. NVIC.org and ICanDecide.org may also have helpful information.
  • If you have read and understood this article, and the warnings in all the scientific studies linked, you can now see that taking the COVID injection is an act of extreme and reckless self-destruction. As a physician, I strongly advise against this vaccine, regardless of brand, for everyone, without exception.
  • If on the other hand, you find that the scientific information in this paper is overwhelming, there is another way to look at COVID virus vs COVID vaccine risks. How many famous people died within 2 weeks after taking the COVID vaccine?
Screen-Shot-2021-03-17-at-11.22.12-AM-1024x355.png

 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

COVID-19 VACCINE Considerations​


Colleen Huber, NMD, February 21, 2021, updated March 15, 2021​

Most of the links below are from medical journals, the FDA, CDC, and other entities that generally support vaccination, yet the information in this article shows how EXTREMELY RISKY the COVID-19 vaccines are.

In my family, we have a rule: If you consider having an experimental medical procedure done,
  1. Don’t even think of insisting that anyone else have it done, inside or outside the family, because they control their own bodies and health decisions, not you; and
  2. Be sure you have read about and can explain in your own words all of the known risks of that procedure before embarking on it. Also, consider potential future risks.
I ask that you, the reader, at least take time to consider the above, and at least consider reading information in the links below, before submitting to this experimental medical procedure.

Is the COVID vaccine experimental? Pfizer and Moderna make the COVID-19 vaccines in the US. The FDA granted “emergency use authorization” for these vaccines (herein “COVID injections,” because they are unlike conventional vaccines). Emergency use authorization is required by law to be made only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19.
  • But are there effective COVID-19 treatments? 100s of studies done around the world have established, and repeatedly confirmed, fast, effective, well-tolerated treatments for COVID-19 that are in widespread use. I briefly summarize them here.
  • General risk vs benefit An emergency experimental vaccine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate, such as COVID-19. The average survival rate for NO COVID treatment at all is 99.74%, and we have very successful treatments available, which should easily achieve universal survivability from COVID, if widely available. Where does 99.74% survival come from? Dr. John Ioannidis is the most widely cited scientist in the world. His estimate in June 2020 of a 0.26% infection fatality rate is now confirmed around the world. 100% - 0.26% = 99.74% average survival rate.

Does the COVID injection work? The COVID injection is not even known to stop the spread of COVID. Dr. Larry Corey, who oversees National Institutes of Health COVID-19 vaccine trials said on 11/20/20: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.” https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388

What happened to the animals in the studies? This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done, all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure. There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology. No experimental coronavirus vaccine has succeeded in animal studies. In this study, coronavirus vaccine caused liver inflammation in test animals.

Specific risks of COVID injections, in roughly chronological order of side-effect manifestation:
  • Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the ingredients. This has been correlated with anaphylactic shock. So the CDC is now recommending intubation kits at vaccination sites.
  • Cationic lipid coating of mRNA is known for many years to be toxic, because these (+) charged fats interact with the (–) charges on our amino acids, our cell membranes and the phosphates of our DNA. Cationic lipids are attracted to and are destructive toward:
  • mRNA: Unlike a traditional vaccine, of injected, inactivated virus intended to stimulate antibody response, the COVID injection on the other hand is completely different in this respect. It uses messenger RNA (mRNA), which is a blueprint for your cells to create COVID-like (spike) proteins. Then your cells begin to make these COVID-like proteins. However, those proteins, in turn, stimulate your body to make antibodies against them. So now your body has been turned into a munitions factory for both sides of a war: The bad guys (COVID-like spike proteins) and the good guys (the antibodies fighting against them). However, before you pledge allegiance to the good guys, as you will see below, the good guys can be more lethal to the vaccinated person.
  • History of mRNA injections: This technology had disastrous results in dengue fever vaccines in the past. Dengue vaccine is a mRNA vaccine. When this was used in children in the Philippines, many vaccinated children had far worse outcomes than unvaccinated children when they were later exposed to dengue, and many died. Prosecution for homicide resulted. However, this had previously been known to happen with ferrets and with cats. In all cases, the vaccinated animal or human became more vulnerable to worse disease when confronted with it. It is expected that the relatively mild COVID-19 illness, with a survival rate of 99.74%, may reduce to a much lower survival rate and become a truly lethal disease in vaccinated people when they later become infected with it. There are no peer-reviewed published human trials of mRNA vaccines at all, and no mRNA vaccine has ever been FDA approved. That’s how new the technology is.
  • mRNA can affect DNA. One of the most worrisome risks with a mRNA vaccine is what can happen with reverse transcriptase. This is an enzyme in every cell, and it can theoretically lead to the mRNA creating changes in the cells’ DNA, a process known as viral retro-integration. Although this possibility had been thought unlikely, MIT and Harvard scientists found it happened here. If some of the 30 trillion or so cells in your body become permanent COVID factories, what is the long-term impact on your health, and would you want that outcome?
  • Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) problem: Prior attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine killed all the test animals, after they were later infected with wild virus. Here’s what happened: mRNA instructed the mammals’ cells to produce the spike proteins of the coronavirus. Then, later, when the animals confronted the wild virus, the intense build-up of antibodies had been stockpiled, and their sudden and overwhelming release killed the test animal. These risks have been documented in Nature, Science and Journal of Infectious Diseases. Here’s a study from Nature on that.
  • ADE mechanism: ADE is a form of pathogenic priming, meaning the vaccine can result in a more severe disease, which has been seen in prior attempts at making coronavirus vaccines. The antibodies made can be neutralizing (which inactivate a virus, and that’s good), but antibodies are a problem when they are non-neutralizing, because then these antibodies carry active viruses directly to macrophages, which then become infected. This is how ADE happens.

This antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) leads to:
  • increased viral replication (more viruses to make you sick); and
  • more severe disease
  • ADE result: These macrophages tend to go to the lungs and fill the lungs, causing overwhelming inflammation and airway obstruction (as found later on autopsy). However, the augmented antibodies also attack similar-looking proteins on internal organs, resulting in cytokine storm and death or auto-immune disease and organ failure. “Cats that showed high titers following vaccination succumbed at later timepoints to fatal disease.”
  • What about miscarriages, and why have men been advised to freeze their sperm prior to getting the injection? Both men and women are at risk for possibly permanent infertility, because the spike protein of a coronavirus “looks” to the immune system similar to Syncytin-1, an essential protein in the placenta. This stimulates antibodies to fight the placenta, and possibly sperm. Mid-term miscarriages, which are normally very rare, have occurred in women who have been vaccinated for COVID. SARS-CoV-2 viral particles have been found to linger in the testicles of men after recovery from infection.
  • Why are COVID vaccinees MORE likely to spread COVID than the unvaccinated? Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, who worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recently warned the World Health Organization (WHO) that "We are currently turning vaccinees into carriers shedding infectious variants."
  • Why is it more dangerous to vaccinate against COVID-19 than other viruses? Because COVID-19 virus uses the ACE-2 receptor to get into your endothelial cells, including those lining the blood vessels. This creates an inflammatory reaction that the great majority (99.74%) have survived even without treatment, and even more who used known, effective treatments. (See page 1) So if you have been exposed to the virus, and then get vaccinated, it is almost certain that the vaccine will cause new inflammation and damage to endothelial cells lining your blood vessels, and we have seen short-term abnormal blood clotting in people who have gotten the vaccine. But the more likely problem is launching new disease in the blood vessels. Dr. H Noorchashm MD, PhD says, “. . . the vaccine is almost certain to do damage to the vascular endothelium.” He explains here.

Israel is at this writing the most heavily COVID-vaccinated country in the world. The findings of infectious disease experts are reported here, in which they determined, from the Israeli data, that the COVID injection causes:
  • " . . .mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly . . .”


How to protect yourself and your family
  • Always read the Product Package Insert. This is required by law to be included with packaging of all vaccines, and US Informed Consent law protects your right to be fully informed prior to any medical procedure, and your right to reject any medical procedure. 45 CFR § 46.116. These are universal principles enshrined in the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Here is the Pfizer insert, and here is Moderna’s. I strongly recommend reading ALL of it carefully with your family before you make a decision regarding whether to have the COVID injection.
  • Discuss the considerations above, as well as other information you have heard about the COVID injection in a relaxed, unhurried setting with your loved ones. Make sure that you are not pressured into a procedure that you may regret in the future. If you choose to defer or reject the COVID injection, know that you are not alone, and many healthcare workers have done the same. "I've heard Tuskegee more times than I can count in the last month - and, you know, it's a valid, valid concern." Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, a hospital chief clinical officer.
  • Share this page with others who are also considering the vaccine.
  • If your employer or school attempts mandatory vaccination, show this information to them. Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination, such as the COVID injection, that is under EUA (explained above). You should also consult your attorney to look into state and federal law prohibiting forced medical procedures. NVIC.org and ICanDecide.org may also have helpful information.
  • If you have read and understood this article, and the warnings in all the scientific studies linked, you can now see that taking the COVID injection is an act of extreme and reckless self-destruction. As a physician, I strongly advise against this vaccine, regardless of brand, for everyone, without exception.
  • If on the other hand, you find that the scientific information in this paper is overwhelming, there is another way to look at COVID virus vs COVID vaccine risks. How many famous people died within 2 weeks after taking the COVID vaccine?
Statement of interests

The author has served as an expert witness in court cases involving questions of safety regarding vaccines.

© Colleen Huber, NMD


Dr. Huber’s research interests since early 2020 have focused on questions of safety regarding masks. Most of these peer-reviewed articles are in Primary Doctor Medical Journal.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2021-03-20 at 11.24.16 PM.png
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,454
Reaction score
30,290
This guy is a total POS & been at this for a very long time.

Good 8 minute video at the link.


A Betrayal Of Trust: Anthony Fauci & The Swine Flu Hoax​


Tim Brown / March 5, 2021

47
SHARES
Facebook Twitter Save WhatsApp




  • Shares


I have previously written on how the entire CONvid-1984 nonsense was tried on the American people more than 10 years ago, but it didn’t work. Now, CONvid is all the rage. Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport goes over the Swine flu hoax that Anthony Fauci tried to pull over on everyone more than a decade ago.

A Decade Ago, The Same Players Of Today Used The Same Tactics & The Same Script As The CONvid-1984 – But They Failed – Let’s Make Them Fail, Again! (Video)

Rappoport writes:

In my current series of articles, I’ve taken apart the Ebola and Zika hoaxes.

Now I take you back to the summer of 2009, when the CDC and the World Health Organization were hyping the “deadly H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic.”
They were, of course, also urging people to take the new Swine Flu vaccine. On that subject, here is an excerpt from Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense (3/27/20):

“For example, [Dr. Anthony] Fauci once shilled for the fast-tracked H1N1 influenza (‘swine flu’) vaccine on YouTube, reassuring viewers in 2009 that serious adverse events were ‘very, very, very rare.’ Shortly thereafter, the vaccine went on to wreak havoc in multiple countries, increasing miscarriage risks in pregnant women in the U.S., provoking a spike in adolescent narcolepsy in Scandinavia and causing febrile convulsions in one in every 110 vaccinated children in Australia—prompting the latter to suspend its influenza vaccination program in under-fives.”
However, that is only half the Swine Flu story. The other half—which involves an astounding hoax—was surely something Fauci was aware of at the time.
Fauci was, in fact, recommending a highly dangerous vaccine for protection against AN EPIDEMIC THAT DIDN’T EXIST AT ALL.
His friends and professional colleagues at the CDC were creating the hoax.
Let me run it down for you.
In the summer of 2009, the CDC was claiming there were thousands of Swine Flu cases in the US. But behind these statistics lay an unnerving secret. A major crime, considering the CDC’s mandate to report the truth to the American people:
Secretly, the CDC had stopped counting cases of Swine Flu.
What? Why?

TRENDING: Muslims Grateful to the West? Never!
CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, discovered the CDC secret; and she found out why.
The routine lab testing of tissue samples from the most likely Swine Flu patients was coming back, in the overwhelming percentage of cases, with: NO SIGN OF SWINE FLU OR ANY OTHER KIND OF FLU.
Attkisson wrote an article about this scandal, and it was published on the CBS News website. However, the next, bigger step—putting out the story on CBS television news—was waylaid. No deal. And CBS shut down any future investigation on the subject. Attkisson’s article died on the vine. No other major news outlet in the world picked up her article and ran with it deeper into the rabbit hole.
Here is what Attkisson told me when I interviewed her:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.
—end of interview excerpt—
So…fake pandemic, CDC crimes, and a damaging vaccine.
But that wasn’t end of it. The CDC wanted to commit another crime. About three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.
Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
Fast forward to 2020. Who in his right mind, armed with a little history, would believe anything the CDC is saying about COVID-19? The discovery of a new coronavirus. The case and death numbers, the accuracy of the diagnostic tests, the need for lockdowns and economic devastation, the safety and importance of a vaccine, the fear porn? Who would believe any of it?
And who would believe anything coming out of the mouth of Dr. Anthony Fauci?
Only a fool.
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
248
Reaction score
283
Location
Pa.
Please comments sound like they're a hypothesis and a theory. Sure it's possible that 6% represents a number who were given the virus through the test kits, but they would have no way of knowing if those persons who received the alleged viral infected test kits had passed the flu on to others or even to the test administrators. So I don't think there's any logical support that 6% represents the deaths from covid out of all total deaths associated with covid.

Likewise then the allegations that if you aren't vaccinated you'll likely die on the short term and if you are vaccinated you'll die on the long term from the vaccination. People are recovering from the covid or whatever it is that they're becoming sick from. The loss of taste and smell seems to be a common indicator of this new viral flu.
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
20,384
Location
North Carolina
One of my wife's nieces, with her husband and son, are living in Italy. The son brought Covid back from school. All 3 got sick at the same time. Son & Dad got better quickly, but Mom is weak with splitting headaches. They are under forced "at home quarantine" for 28 days. The doctors only prescribed Tylenol. Some acquaintances drop off food at their door.
My wife - on the phone - told them about Ivermectin and Azithromicin... and we hope that their doctor will prescribe it for them. But if it's like in France, doctors are forbidden to prescribe anything except Tylenol for Covid....

Around the world, people are getting royally screwed by their "elected officials"...

I bought hydroxychloroquin over the net and it was shipped to my door; legally. $90 for a consultation/questionnaire about health and $30 pharmacy which included quick ship and zinc supplement with the hydroxy

Hope to not need it but not willing to be the victim of politicians interfering with my health care decisions.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
Who is she? And what is the source of this or these statements?
I suggest you let us know. I merely found and posted.
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,172
Reaction score
8,901
I suggest you let us know. I merely found and posted.
The first 2 REAL ARTICLES with EXTENSIVE LINKS & FOOTNOTES to MEDICAL STUDIES are excellent for sharing.
The last statement is OPINION without ANY SUBSTANTIATING links...
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
I can't do everything... many hands make light work? There's a name and there's the inet.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
I bought hydroxychloroquin over the net and it was shipped to my door; legally. $90 for a consultation/questionnaire about health and $30 pharmacy which included quick ship and zinc supplement with the hydroxy

Hope to not need it but not willing to be the victim of politicians interfering with my health care decisions.
link please?
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,172
Reaction score
8,901
I bought hydroxychloroquin over the net and it was shipped to my door; legally. $90 for a consultation/questionnaire about health and $30 pharmacy which included quick ship and zinc supplement with the hydroxy

Hope to not need it but not willing to be the victim of politicians interfering with my health care decisions.

I take quinine (active ancient ingredient of HCQ and HQ) daily in my gin & tonic (Indian Tonic Water - Schweppes etc.). It worked for centuries against malaria for the Brits in the Colonies... It was replaced by HQ and then HCQ when malaria developed resistance to "plain quinine", which covid hasn't had time to do. So I'm GUESSING that it ALSO helps the assimilation of Zinc into cells to PREVENT covid penetration and multiplication.

As a TREATMENT, I've got Ivermectin and Azithromicin sitting on the shelf.
 

the_shootist

I identify as already vaccinated so I'm good!
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
59,363
Reaction score
114,415
Location
Earth
One of my wife's nieces, with her husband and son, are living in Italy. The son brought Covid back from school. All 3 got sick at the same time. Son & Dad got better quickly, but Mom is weak with splitting headaches. They are under forced "at home quarantine" for 28 days. The doctors only prescribed Tylenol. Some acquaintances drop off food at their door.
My wife - on the phone - told them about Ivermectin and Azithromicin... and we hope that their doctor will prescribe it for them. But if it's like in France, doctors are forbidden to prescribe anything except Tylenol for Covid....

Around the world, people are getting royally screwed by their "elected officials"...
I hope I live long enough to see The Day of the Rope for these monster politicians across the globe!
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,172
Reaction score
8,901
I hope I live long enough to see The Day of the Rope for these monster politicians across the globe!
Or their rapid demise from taking what they're pushing on us...
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
20,384
Location
North Carolina

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2021-03-21 at 12.43.52 PM.png
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

WHO Insider Blows Whistle On Gates And GAVI​

Published on March 21, 2021

Written by Dr Joseph Mercola



Dr-Joseph-Mercola.png


This is a really important article. It catalyzed my understanding of what the heck is going on. The facts are obvious; the entire response to the global pandemic was facilitated by the World Health Organization. Their recommendations were followed lock-step by virtually every government on Earth.



No one will dispute this fact. The next data point is: Who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, but the evidence is pretty clear and solid. It is Bill Gates, who became the WHO’s biggest funder when then-President Trump removed U.S. support last year.

What does Gates have to benefit from controlling the WHO? How about the best investment he ever made, with many tens of billions of dollars running through his “nonprofit” GAVI Vaccine Alliance? The maniacal suppression and censorship of any inexpensive natural alternative for COVID-19 makes perfect sense now.

These natural therapies, nebulized hydrogen peroxide being the best example, would be serious competition for the vaccines. If everyone knew that these remedies were readily available, highly effective and practically free, who would risk their life for a vaccine? Virtually no one. It all makes perfect sense.


With that framework, enjoy the information our team has compiled that expands on this general concept. Every day we are putting the pieces of the puzzle together, and the more pieces we fit together, the sooner you will see the bigger picture. More to come in the very near future.

WHO Insider Speaks Out​

In July 2020, four German attorneys founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1).2,3 In the video above, the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4 interviews Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, about what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.

Stuckelberger has served as deputy director of the Swiss national program of aging since the 1990s, and is the president of the WHO-funded Geneva International Network on Ageing.

According to her bio,5 she “is an internationally recognized expert on issues related to evaluating scientific research for policymakers, in particular in health and innovation assessment, pandemic and emergency management training and in optimizing individual and population health and well-being.”

She’s also a published author, with a dozen books to her credit, as well as more than 180 scientific articles, policy papers and governmental and international reports. Stuckelberger points out that much of the research done was and still is highly politicized and primarily done to support and justify political decisions.

For the past 20 years, since 2000, she’s been involved with public health at the WHO, and was part of their research ethics committee for four years. In 2009, she got involved with the WHO’s international health regulations.

Stuckelberger points out that the whole purpose of WHO’s international health regulations is to prepare member states to be ready for a pandemic, to be able to not only prevent outbreaks but also respond swiftly when an outbreak occurs. However, the WHO has actually been actively preventing and undermining this pandemic preparedness training.

The Center Of Corruption​

According to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is at the heart of the corruption, largely thanks to it being the headquarters for GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by Bill Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was recognized as an international institution and granted total blanket immunity.6

As explained by Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee members, GAVI has “qualified diplomatic immunity,” which is odd, considering the organization has no political power that would warrant diplomatic immunity. Odder still is that GAVI’s immunity clauses go beyond even that of diplomats. GAVI’s immunity covers all aspects of engagement, including criminal business dealings.

They can do whatever they want,” Stuckelberger says, without repercussions. The police, for example, are barred from conducting an investigation and collecting evidence if GAVI were to be implicated in a criminal investigation. “It’s shocking,” she says. GAVI is also completely tax exempt, which Stuckelberger notes is “very strange.”

Essentially, GAVI is a nongovernmental organization (NGO) that is allowed to operate without paying any taxes, while also having total immunity for anything they do wrong, willfully or otherwise. This is rather unprecedented, and raises a whole host of questions. It’s particularly disturbing in light of evidence Stuckelberger claims to have found showing that GAVI is “directing, as a corporate entity, the WHO.”

Furthermore, documents cited by Stuckelberger show the WHO has assumed what amounts to dictatorial power over the whole world. The director general has the sole power to make decisions — including decisions about which tests or pandemic medications to use — that all member states must then obey.

The Nation-State Of Gates​

What’s more, Stuckelberger discovered that, in 2017, Gates actually requested to be part of the WHO’s executive board — like a member state — ostensibly because he gives them so much money. Indeed, his funding exceeds that of many individual member states.

Like Stuckelberger says, this is truly incredible — the idea that a single man would have the same power and influence over the WHO as that of an entire nation. It’s a brazen power grab, to say the least. While there’s no evidence that Gates was ever officially granted the status of a member state, one wonders whether he doesn’t have it unofficially.

One thing that raises Stuckelberger’s suspicion is the fact that Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-way contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. “This is abnormal,” she says.

Essentially, in summary, it appears that when he did not get voted in as a one-man nation state, Gates created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO. As mentioned earlier, whatever the director general of the WHO says, goes. They’ve effectively turned global health security into a dictatorship.

The question is, is Gates the real power behind the curtain? Does he tell the director general what to do? When you look back over the past year, it seems Gates has often been the first to announce what the world needs to do to address the pandemic, and then the WHO comes out with an identical message, which is then parroted by world leaders, more or less verbatim.

As noted by Fuellmich, it’s becoming clear that many private-public partnerships have been hijacked by the private side — and they’re immune from liability. “This has got to stop,” he says.

A complete review and overhaul of the United Nations, which established the WHO, is also required as the U.N. has done nothing to prevent or rein in undemocratic and illegal activity. As noted by Fuellmich, we probably need to reconsider whether we even need them.

Changed Definition Of Pandemic Allowed Health Dictatorship​

In the interview, they also highlight the WHO’s role in setting the stage for a global health dictatorship by changing the definition of “pandemic.” The WHO’s original definition, pre-2009, of a pandemic was:7,8

“… when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
The key portion of that definition is “enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” This definition was changed in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic.

The change was a simple but substantial one: They merely removed the severity and high mortality criteria, leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a disease.”9 This switch in definition is why COVID-19 was and still is promoted as a pandemic even though it, at no point, has caused any excess mortality.10,11,12

We now have plenty of data showing the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.13,14,15,16,17 It may be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is about the same. Yet we’re told the price we must all pay to keep ourselves and others safe from this virus is the relinquishing of our civil rights and liberties.

In short, by removing the criteria of severe illness causing high morbidity, leaving geographically widespread infection as the only criteria for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world were able to bamboozle the global population into giving up our lives and livelihoods.

WHO Rewrites Science By Changing Definition Of Herd Immunity​

The WHO has also radically altered the definition of “herd immunity.” Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached.

Prior to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved via exposure to and recovery from an infectious disease. Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior illness, but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that can occur after vaccination.

However, in October 2020, the WHO upended science as we know it, revising this well-established concept in an Orwellian move that totally removes natural infection from the equation.

As late as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was in line with the widely-accepted concept that has been the standard for infectious diseases for decades. Here’s what it originally said:18

“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”
The updated definition of herd immunity, which appeared in October 2020, read as follows:19

“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick.
Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”
After public — and no doubt embarrassing — backlash, the WHO revised its definition again December 31, 2020, to again include the mention of natural infection, while still emphasizing vaccine-acquired immunity. It now reads:20

“’Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity,’ is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.
WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.
Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease.”
WHO-changes-definition-of-herd-immunity-Nov-2020.jpg


WHO’s Recommendation Of PCR Test ‘Intentionally Criminal’​

Stuckelberger also shocks the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee by pointing out that twice — December 7, 2020,21,22 and January 13, 202123 — the WHO issued medical alerts for PCR testing, warning that use of high cycle thresholds (CT) will produce high rates of false positives, that the CT value should be reported to the health care provider and that test results be considered in combination with clinical observations, health history and other epidemiological information.

Yet since the beginning of the pandemic, it has pushed PCR testing as the best way to detect and diagnose infection. This, she says, makes it intentionally criminal. The January 13, 202124,25 medical product alert was, incidentally, posted online January 20, 2021, mere hours after Joe Biden’s inauguration as the President of the United States.

In this alert, the WHO stressed that the “CT needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load,” and that “Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested.”

It also reminds users that “disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results,” so that “as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases.” The alert goes on to explain:26

“This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
Taking a patient’s symptoms into account and using a scientifically defensible CT count should have been routine practice from the beginning. It just didn’t fit the geopolitical narrative. Since the start of the pandemic, the WHO has recommended using a CT of 45,27,28,29 which guarantees an enormous number of false positives, and therefore “cases.” This alone is how they kept the pandemic fearmongering going.

The scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs renders the PCR test useless,30,31,32 as the accuracy will be a measly 3% — 97% are false positives.33 By finally recommending lower CTs and more precise criteria for diagnosis, the WHO engineered an assured end to the caseload at a desired time. Coincidentally, the next day, January 21, 2021, President Biden announced he would reinstate the U.S.’ financial support for the WHO
.34

Time To Put An End To The Global Health Mafia​

The WHO was created as a specialized agency of the U.N., established in 1948 to further international cooperation for improved public health conditions. It was given a broad mandate under its constitution to promote the attainment of “the highest possible level of health” by all peoples.

It is now beyond dispute that the WHO is beyond compromised. Because of its funding — a large portion of which comes from the “one-man nation-state of Gates” — it fails to complete its original mandate. Worse, WHO serves corporate masters and through its dictatorial powers is essentially destroying, not improving, the health of the world.

In June 2010, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) issued a report35 on the WHO’s handling of the 2009 pandemic of novel influenza A (H1N1), which included the recommendation to use a fast-tracked vaccine that ended up causing disability and death around the world.

PACE concluded “the handling of the pandemic by the WHO, EU health agencies and national governments led to a waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”36

Specifically, PACE found “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the organization’s decision-making — a claim echoed by other investigators as well.37,38,39,40,41

The Assembly made a number of recommendations, including greater transparency, better governance of public health, safeguards against undue influence by vested interests, public funding of independent research, and last but not least, for the media to “avoid sensationalism and scaremongering in the public health domain.”42

None of those recommendations were followed and, if anything, the WHO’s mismanagement of public health, thanks to private-public partnerships with NGOs such as GAVI, has only worsened. Other reports, two published in 201543,44 and one in 2017,45 also highlighted the WHO’s failures and lack of appropriate leadership during the 2013 through 2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

While the WHO is recognized as being uniquely suited to carry out key functions necessary in a global pandemic, experts at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the Harvard Global Health Institute, have pointed out, years ago, that the WHO has eroded so much trust that radical reforms would be required before it can assume an authoritative role.

Yet here we are, still, and no reforms ever took place. Instead, the corruption festered and metastasized, and the WHO turned into a power hub for the technocratic deep state that seeks to assume power and control over all nations.

As noted by Fuellmich, we probably need to take a long hard look at the WHO and the U.N., and decide whether they’re even worth saving. At bare minimum, the disproportionate influence by private vested interests, disguised as NGOs such as GAVI, must be thoroughly investigated and routed out.

See more here: articles.mercola
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2021-03-21 at 5.38.51 PM.png
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
248
Reaction score
283
Location
Pa.

WHO Insider Blows Whistle On Gates And GAVI​

Published on March 21, 2021
This 4 member team of the extra-parliamentary committee seems to be a continuation of the videos that I saw about 2 months ago where another who insider, a female, was being interviewed buy a panel of four lawyers.. The interview of this man seems to be a continuation of evidence gathering in preparation for an indictment, we hope

In this article they did not comment on the patenting of a virus. As a Doctor Martin had explained in the video detailing his work in the chemical and biological weapon over sight agency, patent applications and grantings were made for some covid viruses. He explains that if a virus is a natural occurring thing then it can't be patented. And if it is a man-made virus then it can be patented but then it is evidence of biological warfare.

This most recent article above, published March 21st, , today, identifies some of the progressive and, intentional actions made in order for The who to be able to obtain the level of control which they have temporarily done.

Good article
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
24,387

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains
Well isn't that interesting...

COVID Cases Are Spiking In A Dozen States With High Vaccination Rates​

Tyler Durden's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, MAR 19, 2021 - 10:35 AM

As Europe struggles with a "third wave" of COVID infections that's forcing more governments to reimpose at least some lockdown measures, the US is finding that the number of newly confirmed cases is climbing again, with some of the biggest week-over-week increases seen in states that had been praised for their vaccination diligence.


Source: Axios

The US is adding roughly 55K new cases per day, a level that it has plateaued over the past months (though deaths have continued to move lower). Yesterday, health authorities counted 56.9K new case, and 1,052 deaths.


COVID cases are spiking in 13 states over the past week. The rebound in new cases in states like Michigan (which is leading the country over the past week with a 53% spike in new cases) Nevada, Maryland and Connecticut are raising concerns about whether new variants discovered in New York State, along with other variants like the Kent Strain (B117) and other international strains.


Notably, Michigan is above the US average in terms of its vaccination rate according to Johns Hopkins Data. State officials are blaming variants for the surge, citing a similar dynamic seen recently in Florida and New York. Other states among the highest in vaccination rates—including West Virginia, Maine and Montana—are also dealing with case spikes. Of the 13 states with rising cases, only two - Mississippi and New Hampshire - have below-average vaccination rates.

New data from the CDC indicate that the California strain accounted for 13% of all new coronavirus cases that were genetically sequenced as part of a new federal program in late February. An additional 7% of the samples were the strain from the UK.

As the US tops 115MM vaccine doses given, here's a look at how close each US state is to vaccinating 100% of its population.


Source: Bloomberg

In other news, NY and NJ have continued to ease restrictions on restaurants and indoor dining as restrictions are expected to loosen further heading into next month.

Circling back to these new strains, scientists and health officials are on edge because both the UK and Cali strains spread more easily than their predecessors and seem to be more resilient to some of the medicines used to treat COVID-19. The California strain has also shown signs of resistance to the current crop of COVID-19 vaccines, which is just a reminder that a second generation of jabs is already being designed. Studies have found that the California strain, which is one of two new strains first sequenced in the US, is 20% more infectious than other strains.

It's just a reminder that while President Joe Biden keeps talking about families and friends gathering to celebrate July 4 without masks, there's reason enough to worry about another surge in new cases.
 

glockngold

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,712
Reaction score
5,196
I bought hydroxychloroquin over the net and it was shipped to my door; legally. $90 for a consultation/questionnaire about health and $30 pharmacy which included quick ship and zinc supplement with the hydroxy
Hope to not need it but not willing to be the victim of politicians interfering with my health care decisions.
I also used American Frontline Doctors to purchase Hydroxychloroquine.
The process was a little hinky, but successful.
You have to give cell phone, credit card, and email as well as mailing address.
You get an email with a patient number.
Then you wait to be contacted by a doctor.
They say within 48 hours, it actually took 72 hours. It was a pain to carry my cell around all that time, but did not want to go through the call back procedure.
The number's ID said it was from Canada.....
Told Dr. I was not sick, no symptoms, old age, basically healthy, was interested in having a prophylactic in case I get called back in to work where young drunken musicians would be sharing spit covered microphones that I have to handle.
He gave me some rapid fire instructions & 5 minutes & $90.00 later hung up.
Next the instructions say you will be texted or emailed by the pharmacy when your prescription is ready, again in 48 hours.
Didn't happen.
After the 3rd business day, I phoned the number of the pharmacy.
Got an actual English speaking person who says.
"We are not handling your account, call this other number for a pharmacy that handles your state."
I called second number, another english speaking guy was by using my patient number able to look up my prescription.
He says will be sent by UPS. Total cost $75.00
That took 4 days for shipping to me.
What I got was 30 tabs of HCQ., which translates to about 6 months of prophylactic regimen.
Also on pill bottle are instructions for if I am infected, how to dose.
Also got antibiotic doxycycline.
I declined having Zinc sent, as I am good to go with that.

Even though I asked for the prescription to be refillable, several times, the bottle states no refills.

This is not a process I would have wanted to go through If I was already sick.
But at this point I am glad to have the stuff on hand
P1010002.JPG
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

Covid Caused Massive Money Printing Like Never Before – Nick Barisheff​


 

the_shootist

I identify as already vaccinated so I'm good!
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
59,363
Reaction score
114,415
Location
Earth
I think PetCo sells this for fish and birds...
They do and I have some stacked away. It's the same antibiotics that are given to humans

Just grabbed more actually. Great stuff to have in stock to use ONLY when needed and not available anywhere else
 
Last edited:

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,332
Reaction score
9,646
03/22/21

BIG PHARMANEWS

Teachers Sue LA School District Over COVID Vaccine Mandate

Groups representing teachers, counselors and employees say the Los Angeles Unified School District’s vaccine mandate violates federal law and basic human rights.

Employees of the second-largest school district in the U.S. filed suit last week to prevent the district from mandating COVID-19 vaccines as a condition of employment.

California Educators for Medical Freedom, with assistance from the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), filed a federal lawsuit March 17 against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD).

In a press release, HFDF said LAUSD’s vaccine mandate violates federal law and basic human rights by requiring employees to take an experimental vaccine in order to remain employed.
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,454
Reaction score
30,290

Israel, New Zealand OK sale of virus killing nasal spray​

by Reuters
Monday, 22 March 2021 15:27 GMT

JERUSALEM, March 22 (Reuters) - Israel and New Zealand have given interim approval for the sale of biotech firm SaNOtize Research and Development's Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray (NONS) which could help prevent transmission of the COVID-19 virus, the company said on Monday.

Manufacturing of NONS, under the brand name Enovid, has begun in Israel with SaNOtize's partner Nextar Chempharma Solutions Ltd and it is expected to be on sale there this summer.

In New Zealand, SaNOtize has registered its nasal spray with the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, which permits the company to distribute and sell NONS over the counter immediately, the Vancouver-based company said.

NONS protects users from viruses that enter the body through the upper nasal pathways.

Last week, SaNOtize and Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Surrey, UK announced results of clinical trials showing that NONS was an effective antiviral treatment that could prevent the transmission of COVID-19, shorten its course, and reduce the severity of symptoms and damage in those already infected.

Chris Miller, SaNOtize's chief science officer, said its formulation of Nitric Oxide for use in humans is designed to "kill viruses in the upper airways, preventing them from incubating and spreading to the lungs."
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,454
Reaction score
30,290

3 Hawaii residents fully vaccinated against COVID-19 are infected with the coronavirus​

A vaccine that is 95% efficacy will protect 95 out of 100 people, meaning 5% may still contract the virus if exposed
Monday, March 22nd 2021, 12:44 PM HST by Nicole Tam

At least three people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in Hawaii were later infected with the virus. The Department of Health calls it break through cases.

Doctors KITV4 spoke with said they're not surprised and people should not be alarmed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, current vaccines are between 66 and 95 percent effective. Physicians say the vaccine doesn't prevent infection but it does lower the risk hospitalization and severe symptoms.

COVID-19 & The Vaccine: Your Headquarters For Everything You Need To Know

One breakthrough case involved a healthcare worker who visited multiple cities in the U.S. then tested positive after returning to Oahu. Dr. Melinda Ashton, Chief Quality Officer with Hawaii Pacific Health says that's an example of why traveling may increase risk of infection.


"Absolutely you need to be careful during those times when you’re in the airport, on the airplane, with other people in larger groups," Ashton said.

Only five people across the state are currently in an ICU bed with the coronavirus. At its peak last September, it was as high as 65. Dr. Julius Pham, chair of the COVID-19 committee at Queen's Medical Center, believes it's a clear sign vaccines offer protection against hospitalization.

"We haven't seen those type of numbers since early early in the pandemic," Pham said. "We're still having about 50-60 cases per day in the state but our hospitalization numbers are down more than the rate of infection in the state."

A common question still being asked about the vaccines? Are people diagnosed with COVID-19 after vaccination, more or less infectious.


"Overtime, as more people get vaccinated, we have more time under our belt with this vaccine, we have a better idea of how long the protection lasts," Dr. Michael Walter, Kalihi-Palama Health Center, said.

According to the health department, the fully vaccinated individuals who tested positive did not become severely ill and none of them are known to have transmitted the virus.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
57,811
Reaction score
114,783
Location
Rocky Mountains

AstraZeneca Vaccine Caused Rare Blood Clots Due To Unexpected Immune Reaction​

HAF
HAFMarch 19, 2021

In a huge development the Chief Norwegian Investigator and Physician Pal Andre Holme who examined the three hospitalized health workers has confirmed that it was indeed the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine which caused the rare blood clots due to unexpected immune reaction.

 

the_shootist

I identify as already vaccinated so I'm good!
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
59,363
Reaction score
114,415
Location
Earth

AstraZeneca Vaccine Caused Rare Blood Clots Due To Unexpected Immune Reaction​

HAF
HAFMarch 19, 2021

In a huge development the Chief Norwegian Investigator and Physician Pal Andre Holme who examined the three hospitalized health workers has confirmed that it was indeed the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine which caused the rare blood clots due to unexpected immune reaction.

I suppose they should have tested for blood clotting before they shot their shit into millions of people instead of after, huh?
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Supporter +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
20,384
Location
North Carolina
I also used American Frontline Doctors to purchase Hydroxychloroquine.
The process was a little hinky, but successful.
You have to give cell phone, credit card, and email as well as mailing address.
You get an email with a patient number.
Then you wait to be contacted by a doctor.
They say within 48 hours, it actually took 72 hours. It was a pain to carry my cell around all that time, but did not want to go through the call back procedure.
The number's ID said it was from Canada.....
Told Dr. I was not sick, no symptoms, old age, basically healthy, was interested in having a prophylactic in case I get called back in to work where young drunken musicians would be sharing spit covered microphones that I have to handle.
He gave me some rapid fire instructions & 5 minutes & $90.00 later hung up.
Next the instructions say you will be texted or emailed by the pharmacy when your prescription is ready, again in 48 hours.
Didn't happen.
After the 3rd business day, I phoned the number of the pharmacy.
Got an actual English speaking person who says.
"We are not handling your account, call this other number for a pharmacy that handles your state."
I called second number, another english speaking guy was by using my patient number able to look up my prescription.
He says will be sent by UPS. Total cost $75.00
That took 4 days for shipping to me.
What I got was 30 tabs of HCQ., which translates to about 6 months of prophylactic regimen.
Also on pill bottle are instructions for if I am infected, how to dose.
Also got antibiotic doxycycline.
I declined having Zinc sent, as I am good to go with that.

Even though I asked for the prescription to be refillable, several times, the bottle states no refills.

This is not a process I would have wanted to go through If I was already sick.
But at this point I am glad to have the stuff on hand
View attachment 205320

I just did the questionnaire. I don’t have to speak a doctor and had the script in 2 work days

I’m not worried about cc access it’s so simple to dispute and resolve these days that there’s no risk. I bought $100 worth of spring loaded Trump logo knives that never came, clicked the dispute button next to the charge, wrote 2 sentences about unresponsive and no shipment and got the refund next cycle.

I used to be careful about it but life’s too short and with credit file locked it’s not an issue

Your mileage may vary