• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

Dr Roger Hodkinson – “When the history of this madness is written, reputations will be slaughtered and there will be blood in the gutter “


VACCINES could cause “mass male infertility”, Anthony Fauci is a “dead man walking” and the inquest into the pandemic will leave “blood in the gutter” with reputations torn to shreds for their sheer “idiocy”.

Dr Roger Hodkinson says there is “sufficient evidence in the literature” to show the spike protein expresses in the placenta and the testes – and could kill unborn babies in current pregnancies and permanently stop men having children.

He also said no one should listen to the likes of Prince Harry advocating the jab because he has “nothing between his ears”.

Dr Hodkinson is a pathologist by training, with a wealth of knowledge in infectious disease, virology and evidence-based medicine, who was educated at Cambridge University and University College Hospital Medical School in London, before moving to Canada in 1970 and training at the University of British Columbia.

He came to notoriety for his speech to the Edmonton City Council on November 13 last year regarding their vote on extending mandatory mask orders, saying the response to Covid was “the biggest hoax perpetrated on an unsuspecting public”.
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
AFt-0277.jpg
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
Senior Trump HHS COVID Advisor Drops BOMBS! Task Force Mislead POTUS, No "Pandemic" (21 min 51 sec):

Published August 27, 2021 by Stew Peters Show​
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258
The first kill off cover up...

The 1918 Rockefeller-US Army Worldwide Pandemic
LARRY ROMANOFF • DECEMBER 18, 2020

One new historical development that has been evolving over a few years and now brought into focus because of COVID-19, is the so-called “Spanish Flu” of 1918. Recurring reports and documentation are emerging to tell us that this ‘Greatest Pandemic in History’ was[1]
not “Spanish”,[2]
not “the flu” and,[3] not a natural occurrence but the result of human tinkering with vaccines. There surely is much more to emerge, but the accumulating evidence to date is too compelling to dismiss.

In simple terms, the emerging evidence supports postulations that the 1918 pandemic was caused by a misguided – and very experimental – Rockefeller Institute meningitis vaccination program which was initiated at Fort Riley by the US military, and spread to the world from there. This essay will attempt to briefly document the evidence that is available so far. There will of course be many objections to the content of this essay, not only from the ideologues and trolls, but from those in high places with vital body organs requiring protection.

...

The 1918 pandemic was quite possibly the worst the world had seen, certainly for centuries. It infected about 500 million people and killed at least 50 million worldwide. The current “official narrative” (again) is that it was caused by “an H1N1 virus that originated in birds” (which is not a ‘flu’ in any case), and its only tenuous connection with the US was that it was “first identified in the US in military personnel” in the spring of 1918. These claims appear to be false. In a 2008 report, the US NIH admitted that most of the deaths were not from ‘the flu’ nor from any bird virus but from a bacterial pneumonia.[1]
...

The Smoking Gun

According to the 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is likely higher than 92.7%. The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.” “… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.

“There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and non-hemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded non-hemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.”[2]
Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied. That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer[6]
 

Uncle

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
3,147
Reaction score
6,244
Location
SA

The CDC can't even do simple arithmetic.

If 0.00003% dies then 99.99997% survives.
If 0.0002% dies then 99.9998% survives.
If 0.005% dies then 99.995% survives.
If 0.054% dies then 99.946% survives.

Golden Regards
Uncle
 
Last edited:

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
16,722
Reaction score
37,630

Here We Go: Biden and Fauci Discuss Requiring Covid Booster Shots Every 5 Months (VIDEO)​

By Cristina Laila
Published August 28, 2021 at 12:50pm
1595 Comments
IMG_4660-1.jpg


Joe Biden on Friday said he and Dr. Fauci discussed requiring Covid booster shots every five months.

The original plan was to offer a booster shot 8 months after the second dose.

We went from 2 doses of Covid shots – to 2 doses and one booster – to 2 doses and a booster shot every 5 months real quick.

“The question raised is should it be shorter than eight months? Should it be as little as five months? That’s being discussed. I spoke with Dr. Fauci this morning about that,” Biden said in the Oval Office with Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.


The Pfizer CEO gave away the game plan earlier this week during an interview with Fox News.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on Tuesday said a vaccine-resistant variant will likely emerge.

But don’t worry because the pharma company already has a system in place to release a “variant-specific” jab within 95 days.

A booster every 5 months is going to turn into a shot every 3 months in order to protect against “variants.”
 

BigJim#1-8

Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,252
Reaction score
21,126

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
67,280
Reaction score
136,877
The CDC can't even do simple arithmetic.

If 0.00003% dies then 99.99997% survives.
If 0.0002% dies then 99.9998% survives.
If 0.005% dies then 99.995% survives.
If 0.054% dies then 99.946% survivvives

Golden Regards
Uncle
Which begs the question, which data is correct? The numbers don't jive (as you point out) but which side is incorrect?
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

WHO scientist may face death penalty for advising against ivermectin: ‘Deleting the tweet won’t save her’


A 51-page legal statement prepared by the India Bar Association (IBA) attacked WHO Chief Scientist of India Soumya Swaminathan with 71 counts describing Swaminatan’s evaluation discouraging ivermectin to treat COVID-19 as “extremely unreasonable” and “having another purpose.”

The Association called to invoke articles 302, 304 (paragraph 2), and 88 of the Indian Penal Code regarding murder and other crimes to punish Swaminathan. If Swaminatan is convicted, she may face the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Ivermectin was first developed as a veterinary drug in the 1970s, however since 1988 it has been prescribed for humans to combat various parasitic infections. Was later added to the WHO’s list of essential medications and in 2015 the inventors were awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

According to reports from the Indian The Print news network and the independent global health news website Healthpolicy-Watch, the India Bar Association (IBA) submitted the suit on May 25th. The statement accused her of “initiating a false propaganda campaign against ivermectin” and “inducing the public to refuse to use ivermectin” to treat COVID-19.

On May 10th, India’s Health Ministry approved an ivermectin-based COVID treatment regimen, recommending all residents over 18-years-old take 5 ivermectin tablets, and that this can prevent fatal high fever associated with COVID-19.

After the Health Ministry introduced the policy, Swaminatan reiterated the view of the WHO, tweeting: “No matter what kind of medicine is used to treat the disease, safety and effectiveness are very important. Except in clinical trials, the WHO does not recommend the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.”

The India Bar Association wrote in its legal statement: “Your misleading tweet against the use of ivermectin on May 10 this year led to the exclusion of ivermectin from the coronavirus treatment regimen in Tamil Nadu on May 11, despite the fact that this drug was previously a treatment on the drug list.

“The world has gradually realized that you use the ’scientific method’ to describe fabricated facts. This method is absurd, arbitrary, and ridiculous. The WHO claims to be ’omniscient’, but this is like a vain emperor wearing his new clothes, and the whole world only now knows that the emperor is wearing no clothes at all.”

IBA legal team head Dipali Ojha further threatened: “Issuing a legal statement is only the first step, we will continue to move forward.”

Swaminathan deleted the tweet after receiving the legal statement, but on June 5th, the IBA updated their website: “The action of deleting the tweet just proved her maliciousness… Deleting this tweet will not save her and her colleagues. We will support citizens to initiate litigation for her criminal actions.” It is unclear whether the organization has formally filed a lawsuit.

The WHO said in response statement that they “regret” unprovoked attacks on senior officials.

Swaminathan is an Indian pediatrician and clinical scientist well-known for tuberculosis research, and has been the chief scientist of the WHO since March 2019.

She also said there was “no logic” in some nations blocking Covishield from their vaccine passport program, “which will allow hassle-free travel during the pandemic.”
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
LWt-5252.jpg
 

tigerwillow1

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
3,182
The following is from the Oregon directive that all healthcare workers and school staff get the jab. Somebody help me understand. Don't these sentences contradict the need for the jab?

"There is emerging evidence that people infected with the Delta variant have similar viral loads regardless of vaccination status suggesting that even vaccine breakthrough cases may transmit this variant effectively. Being vaccinated, is therefore critical to prevent spread of Delta."
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
14,407
Reaction score
21,307
Location
USSA
The following is from the Oregon directive that all healthcare workers and school staff get the jab. Somebody help me understand. Don't these sentences contradict the need for the jab?

"There is emerging evidence that people infected with the Delta variant have similar viral loads regardless of vaccination status suggesting that even vaccine breakthrough cases may transmit this variant effectively. Being vaccinated, is therefore critical to prevent spread of Delta."
1630284578729.png
 

Tbonz

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
2,240
Reaction score
2,425
Location
Land of the Free
The following is from the Oregon directive that all healthcare workers and school staff get the jab. Somebody help me understand. Don't these sentences contradict the need for the jab?

"There is emerging evidence that people infected with the Delta variant have similar viral loads regardless of vaccination status suggesting that even vaccine breakthrough cases may transmit this variant effectively. Being vaccinated, is therefore critical to prevent spread of Delta."
TW, that right there shows the exact mindset of every liberal in America.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains

Former Vodafone Boss Blows Whistle on 5G Corona Virus Agenda (Video)​

Saturday, August 28, 2021

Another brave whistle blower comes forward to expose the treacherous 5G Corona virus biological weapon attack. More clarification. Glutathione, found naturally in watercress and similar greens flushes graphene oxide and other heavy metals and toxins from the body.

video at link
 

Cigarlover

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Survivor
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
10,178
Reaction score
21,088
At the concert 2 nights ago, 15-20,000 people all packed in together having a great time. No masks.
2 lines to get in. the vaccinated and the negative covid test. Both ran very fast. People were very friendly and just happy to be out and have something normal again.
One thing that was very troubling, couldn't pass a joint around. No-one smoking weed? WTF happened to people? I was probably one of the oldest people there and one of the few that was openly smoking. Props to my daughter though, she really wanted to hang with her dad and she never once turned that joint away. I know she had to be baked to because I was and I smoke more than she does. :).
My impression is that people have had enough of the BS. This was at Dave Mathews so although there is a healthy mix politically I would say the crowd is probably 60-65% left leaning. Not far left but left leaning.
There was one girl a few rows in front of us. She came in wearing a mask, looked around for about 2 minutes and then the mask hit the floor. LOL. The peer pressure of noone wearing a mask was just to much for her. That was the only mask I saw the whole night.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains

New Zealand reports first death linked to Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine​

August 29, 2021,

WELLINGTON (Reuters) -New Zealand on Monday reported what authorities said was the country's first recorded death linked to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

The information was released by the health ministry following a review by an independent COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring board of the death of a woman after receiving the vaccine. The ministry's statement did not give the woman's age.

The board considered that the woman’s death was due to myocarditis, which is known to be a rare side effect of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, the statement said. Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that can limit the organ's ability to pump blood and can cause changes in heartbeat rhythms.

"This is the first case in New Zealand where a death in the days following vaccination has been linked to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine," the health ministry said.

 

tigerwillow1

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
3,182

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
16,722
Reaction score
37,630
DYODD as I found this on another web site, but this is what I have been saying. All jabs are not created equal. It may be Russian Roulette.
Designed to affect different people in different ways. Some instantly. Some maybe months or years from now. Some maybe after thay get another jab that reacts with the first one. If they are going to kill us all off they have to have more of a plan that to kill everyone at once. THey need to do it in an orderly controllable fashion. Say booster shots on their time schedule to control the chaos.




The text beneath the line below is from Jimstone.is Sorry, no direct link. It's currently beneath the map of New Orleans. He mistakenly says Pfizer instead of Moderna.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/08/29/national/moderna-contaminants-vaccines-okinawa/

Separately, Okinawa Prefecture suspended some Moderna vaccinations Saturday evening after observing suspected foreign particles in doses that did not come from the three halted batches,
The prefecture said it found black particles and pink particles in vials before use at a mass vaccination center in Naha on Saturday. Moderna vaccinations at the same site were also suspended Sunday.

This can't happen if not intentional. Japan discovered: 1. Shots with pink stuff in them. 2. Shots with black stuff in them. 3. Shots with shiny metallic magnetic stuff in them. And it was not just a few shots, it was millions that had EACH PROBLEM. That means it was not a problem.

I saw and ignored a post by "someone who works for pfizer" saying there were 10 different varianst of the shots, each designed to do something different to the recipient. I blew the post off as B.S. However, if Japan found three different "contaminants" in the pfizer shot, and each event had thousands of vials involved, perhaps that post was accurate because that can't happen in a factory if it was not intentional and no individual could ever hand contaminate that many vials. That employee said one of the 10 possibilities was saline. That would mean Japan has discovered 4 out of 10 variants.

I totally called B.S. on this, and ignored it. But it has a good chance of being true now that Japan has discovered there are different versions of the shot (by what they have found in them) and the difference in all of this is that the Japanese were skeptical to begin with, did not have fully controlled lying scamming sh*t bag hospitals and pharmacies and THEN did not have a total con job media hiding stuff like this.

So now Japan is switching over to Ivermectin
 

Jodster

Always wrong
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
1,639

Former Vodafone Boss Blows Whistle on 5G Corona Virus Agenda (Video)​

Saturday, August 28, 2021

Another brave whistle blower comes forward to expose the treacherous 5G Corona virus biological weapon attack. More clarification. Glutathione, found naturally in watercress and similar greens flushes graphene oxide and other heavy metals and toxins from the body.

video at link
No offence’Hedge but that was 10 lbs of shit stuffed in a 5 lb bag.
I had a Secret clearance and worked for a military contractor. I also have background in electronics and IT. I’m calling BS on half of that podcast. Verbal diarrhea at it’s best.
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
67,280
Reaction score
136,877
No offence’Hedge but that was 10 lbs of shit stuffed in a 5 lb bag.
I had a Secret clearance and worked for a military contractor. I also have background in electronics and IT. I’m calling BS on half of that podcast. Verbal diarrhea at it’s best.
To be fair to GH and others, it's become very difficult to know what's truth and what's bullshit these days. Both sides are pumping out propaganda like it's going out of style. The best we can all do is takes it all with a grain of salt. Until something actually happens, it's only a rumor!
 

Jodster

Always wrong
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
1,639
To be fair to GH and others, it's become very difficult to know what's truth and what's bullshit these days. Both sides are pumping out propaganda like it's going out of style. The best we can all do is takes it all with a grain of salt. Until something actually happens, it's only a rumor!
I 100% agree, Shooty. Goldhedge is easily in my top 3 favourite posters here on GIM.
However the content of that podcast is sketch. It’s like the broadcaster typed in “5G conspiracies”, then copied and pasted a 20 minute rant.
Stuff like satellites in the Van Allen belt when anybody in telecom learns about Clark standard orbit in the first week. Companies launching 100,000 satellites in 1969. Covid doesn’t exist; it’s a result of 5 G.
Then minutes later he says the virus (which he said didn’t exist) is being spread on purpose.
it’s a good lesson in being wary of any media we digest these days.
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
8,984
Reaction score
12,875
btw, the company in India where I ordered the covid kits appears legit... I have the India Post Tracking on the package... Info in "Ivermectin thread"

ziverdo kit.jpg


India Post GIM2.jpg
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

60% of Those Older Than 50 Who Die From COVID Are Double Vaxxed

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE -​

  • As of August 15, 2021, 68% of COVID patients admitted to hospital in the U.K. who were over the age of 50 had received one or two doses of COVID injections. By mid-August, 59% of serious cases in Israel were also among those who had received two COVID injections, mirroring U.K. data
  • Only in the 50 and younger category were a majority, 74%, of British COVID patients unvaccinated. Those claiming we’re in a pandemic of the unvaccinated fail to differentiate between age groups
  • The same applies to COVID deaths in the U.K. Unvaccinated make up the majority of deaths only in the under-50 age group. In the over-50 group, the clear majority, 70%, are either partially or fully “vaccinated”
  • We cannot rely on U.S. data to get a clear idea of how the COVID shots are working, as the CDC has chosen to only track breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization and/or death
  • Reanalysis of Pfizer’s, Moderna’s and Janssen’s COVID trial data using the proper endpoint show the shots are hurting the health of the population, and if mass vaccination continues we face “a looming vaccine-induced public health catastrophe”
  • A new study shows that vaccinated individuals are up to 13 times more likely to get infected with the new Delta variant than unvaccinated individuals who have had a natural COVID infection
The oft-repeated refrain right now is that we're in a "pandemic of the unvaccinated," meaning those who have not received the COVID jab make up the bulk of those hospitalized and dying from the Delta variant. For example, August 20, 2021, England's chief medical officer professor Chris Whitty tweeted:1,2
"Four weeks working on a COVID ward makes stark the reality that the majority of our hospitalized COVID patients are unvaccinated and regret delaying. Some are very sick including young adults. Please don't delay your vaccine."
Curiously, if you take the time to actually look at the data, you'll find that this blanket statement is rather deceptive. Here's a graphic published in the Evening Standard, sourced from Public Health England:3
COVID-19 delta variant hospital admission and death in England

As you can see, as of August 15, 2021, 58% of COVID patients admitted to hospital who were over the age of 50 had actually received two doses of COVID injections and 10% had received one dose. So, partially or fully "vaccinated" individuals made up 68% of hospitalizations.
Only in the 50 and younger category were a majority, 74%, of hospitalizations among the unvaccinated. Whitty, however, completely neglected to differentiate between the age groups. The same applies to deaths. Unvaccinated only make up the majority of COVID deaths in the under-50 age group. In the over-50 group, the clear majority, 70%, are either partially or fully "vaccinated."

It's also unclear whether hospitals in the U.K. (and elsewhere) are still designating anyone who is admitted and tests positive with a PCR test as a "COVID patient." If so, people with broken bones or any number of other health problems who have no symptoms of COVID-19 at all might be unfairly lumped into the "unvaccinated COVID patient" total.

Israeli Data Show COVID Jab Is Failing in Over-50s​

In Israel, where vaccine uptake has been very high due to restrictions on freedom for those who don't comply,4 data show those who have received the COVID jab are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than people with natural immunity.5,6,7
The fully "vaccinated" also made up the bulk of serious cases and COVID-related deaths in July 2021, as illustrated in the graphs below.8 The red is unvaccinated, yellow refers to partially "vaccinated" and green fully "vaccinated" with two doses. By mid-August, 59% of serious cases were among those who had received two COVID injections,9 mirroring the data coming out of the U.K.
Hospitalizations and severe COVID patients
COVID-related deaths

In an August 16, 2021, Science article,10 Israeli Minister of Health Nitzan Horowitz is quoted saying the nation has entered a "critical time" in the race against the pandemic. Horowitz allegedly was given a third booster shot August 13, 2021, the day they began offering a third dose to people over the age of 50.
From Public Health England's data, it seems clear that the COVID shots are failing to protect people over the age of 50 in the U.K. as well, so it's probably only a matter of time before booster shots are rolled out there too. And, provided the COVID injections are the same irrespective of country, there's every reason to assume the same trends will emerge in other countries, including the U.S.
This is precisely what Ran Balicer, chief innovation officer at Clalit Health Services, Israel's largest health maintenance organization (HMO), told Science: "If it can happen here, it can probably happen everywhere."11

Israeli Data Considered the Best Around​

The data coming out of Israel is considered by many to be the best we have, and can give us a glimpse of what to expect elsewhere. As explained by Science magazine:12
"Israel is being closely watched now because it was one of the first countries out of the gate with vaccinations in December 2020 and quickly achieved a degree of population coverage that was the envy of other nations — for a time.
The nation of 9.3 million also has a robust public health infrastructure and a population wholly enrolled in HMOs that track them closely, allowing it to produce high-quality, real-world data on how well vaccines are working.
'I watch [Israeli data] very, very closely because it is some of the absolutely best data coming out anywhere in the world,' says David O'Connor, a viral sequencing expert at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
'Israel is the model,' agrees Eric Topol, a physician-scientist at Scripps Research. 'It's pure mRNA vaccines. It's out there early. It's got a very high level population [uptake]. It's a working experimental lab for us to learn from.'
Israel's HMOs … track demographics, comorbidities, and a trove of coronavirus metrics on infections, illnesses, and deaths. 'We have rich individual-level data that allows us to provide real-world evidence in near–real time,' Balicer says …
Now, the effects of waning immunity may be beginning to show in Israelis vaccinated in early winter; a preprint13 published last month … found that protection from COVID-19 infection during June and July dropped in proportion to the length of time since an individual was vaccinated.People vaccinated in January had a 2.26 times greater risk for a breakthrough infection than those vaccinated in April."

Where Will It End?​

According to Science magazine, breakthrough cases are now multiplying at breakneck speed. "There are so many breakthrough infections that they dominate and most of the hospitalized patients are actually vaccinated," Uri Shalit, a bioinformatician at the Israel Institute of Technology told Science.14
Nearly 1 million Israelis over the age of 50 have now received a third booster of Pfizer's mRNA shot. Time will tell whether this will worsen the rate of breakthrough cases or tame it.
Dvir Aran, a biomedical data scientist at the Israel Institute of Technology doesn't seem very hopeful, telling Science the surge is already so steep, "even if you get two-thirds of those 60-plus [boosted], it's just gonna give us another week, maybe two weeks until our hospitals are flooded" again.15
The obvious question is, what then?! Will the answer be a fourth injection before the year is over? Will we be looking at quarterly injections? Monthly injections? Biweekly? Weekly? Where and when does it end? It is fairly easy to predict that this can only end very badly.

US Tracks Only Fraction of Breakthrough Infections​

Unfortunately, we cannot rely on U.S. data to get a clear idea of how the COVID shots are working, as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has chosen not to track all breakthrough cases. As reported by ProPublica,16 May 1, 2021, the CDC stopped tracking and reporting all breakthrough cases, opting to log only those that result in hospitalization and/or death.
As noted in the article, this irrational decision has "left the nation with a muddled understanding of COVID-19's impact on the vaccinated." It also prevents us from understanding how variants are spreading and whether those who have received the jab can still develop so-called "long-haul syndrome."
Individual states are also setting their own criteria for how they collect data on breakthrough cases, and this patchwork muddies the waters even further. Despite these limitations, what little data we do have is starting to mirror that of Israel and the U.K.
August 18, 2021, the CDC released three reports,17,18,19 which show the protection you get from the COVID shot is rapidly waning.
"Among nursing home residents, one of the studies showed vaccine effectiveness dropped from 74.7% in the spring to just 53.1% by midsummer,"ProPublica writes.20 "Similarly, another report found that the overall effectiveness among vaccinated New York adults dropped from 91.7% to just under 80% between May and July.
The new findings prompted the Biden administration to announce on Wednesday that people who got a Moderna or Pfizer vaccine will be offered a booster shot eight months after their second dose. The program is scheduled to begin the week of Sept. 20 but needs approval from the Food and Drug Administration and a CDC advisory committee.
This latest development is seen by some as another example of shifting public health messaging and backpedaling that has accompanied every phase of the pandemic for 19 months through two administrations. A little more than a month ago, the CDC and the FDA released a joint statement saying that those who have been fully vaccinated 'do not need a booster shot at this time' …
The CDC tracked all breakthrough cases until the end of April, then abruptly stopped without making a formal announcement. A reference to the policy switch appeared on the agency's website in May about halfway down the homepage.
'I was shocked,' said Dr. Leana Wen, a physician and visiting professor of health policy and management at George Washington University. 'I have yet to hear a coherent explanation of why they stopped tracking this information' …
Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., became alarmed after the Provincetown outbreak and wrote to CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky on July 22, questioning the decision to limit investigation of breakthrough cases. He asked what type of data was being compiled and how it would be shared publicly21 ... Markey asked the agency to respond by Aug. 12. So far the senator has received no reply …"

Vaxxed Are Up to 13 Times More Likely to Get Delta Variant​

While the U.S. is lax about recording breakthrough infections, researchers in Israel have some breaking news: They have been keeping track, and their studies22 show that vaccinated individuals are up to 13 times more likely to get the Delta variant of COVID-19 than those who were not vaccinated, but had recovered from a COVID infection.
As explained by ScienceMag:23 The study "found in two analyses that people who were vaccinated in January and February were, in June, July and the first half of August, six to 13 times more likely to get infected than unvaccinated people who were previously infected with the coronavirus. In one analysis, comparing more than 32,000 people in the health system, the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 was 27 times higher among the vaccinated, and the risk of hospitalization eight times higher."
The study also said that, while vaccinated persons who also had natural infection did appear to have additional protection against the Delta variant, the vaccinated were still at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those without the vaccine, but who were previously infected. Vaccinees who hadn't had a natural infection also had a 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease.
One thing to note here is that the wording of this is important: The study does not say that getting a vaccine helps protect you if you've had a natural infection; rather, it says that natural protection helps boost the vaccine. Either way, even if you do have natural infection in combination with the vaccination, vaccinees are still at an increased risk for a breakthrough infection.
"This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity," the study authors concluded.

Fully Vaxxed Speak Out​

Back America, in an August 24, 2021, article,24 The Defender cites data from seven states (California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Virginia) that keep more detailed records than most. In six of these states, breakthrough infections accounted for 18% to 28% of all new COVID diagnoses in the past several weeks, as well as 12% to 24% of all COVID-related hospitalizations.
In Los Angeles, breakthrough cases have risen from 5% in April and 13% in July to a current of 30%. Fully vaxxed celebrities and elected officials have now started speaking out after getting COVID. As reported by The Defender: 25
"Melissa Joan Hart, the former 'Sabrina the Teenage Witch' star is 'really mad' she has a breakthrough case. Hart shared on Instagram Aug. 19 … 'I got COVID. I am vaccinated. And I got COVID. And it's bad. It's weighing on my chest, it's hard to breathe' …
Celebrity Hilary Duff, revealed she had COVID on Instagram Aug. 20. Duff said she was experiencing a bad headache, brain fog, sinus pressure and a loss of taste and smell despite being vaccinated …
Slipknot singer Corey Taylor, 47, was devastated after testing positive for COVID and was forced to call off his upcoming appearance at a Michigan pop culture convention this weekend, Rolling Stone reported. 'I wish I had better news,' said Taylor in a recorded video message last week on Facebook. 'I woke up today and tested positive and I'm very, very sick' …
Rev. Jesse Jackson, and his wife, Jacqueline, remained under doctors' observation Monday[August 23, 2021] at a Chicago hospital after getting COVID … Jackson, a Chicago civil rights leader, was fully vaccinated and received his first dose in January during a publicized event where he urged others to receive the vaccine as soon as possible …
Three U.S. senators — John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Angus King (I-Maine) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) — announced Aug. 19 they tested positive for COVID despite being fully vaccinated, CBS News reported …
The news came days after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who also was fully vaccinated, tested positive for COVID. Illinois state Sen. Dan McConchie announced Aug. 21 he had a 'breakthrough' case of COVID."

CDC Has Also Hidden Breakthrough Cases in Other Ways​

The CDC also cooked the books on COVID breakthrough cases in other ways. Originally, the CDC recommended labs use a CT of 4026 when testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This, despite using a CT above 35 was known to create a false positive rate of 97%.27 By using an exaggerated CT, healthy people were deemed stricken with COVID-19.
In May 2021, the CDC lowered the CT from 40 to 28 or lower — but only when doing PCR testing on individuals who have received the COVID jab.28Unvaccinated were still tested using a CT of 40. The end result is obvious: "Vaccinated" individuals became far less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection while unvaccinated were still exceedingly getting false positives. As noted by Off-Guardian:29
"This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimize the other. What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?"

How the CDC Invented the 'Pandemic of Unvaxxed' Narrative​


The CDC also played fast and loose with the data when it invented the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" narrative30 that we're now being indoctrinated with. In a July 16, 2021, White House press briefing,31 CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed "over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated."
Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe. ~ Dr. Bart Classen, Trends in Internal Medicine
As it turns out, that statistic is based on hospitalization data from January through June 2021, when the majority of Americans had not yet gotten the COVID jab. January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots,32 and as of June 30, just 46.9% were "fully vaccinated."33

COVID Shots 'Proven to Cause More Harm Than Good'​

While the official narrative is that the COVID shots may be "less than perfect" but are still better than the alternative (i.e., getting the infection when you're unvaccinated), Dr. Bart Classen published a study34 in the August 2021 issue of Trends in Internal Medicine, disputing this claim.
The study,35 "U.S. COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, 'All Cause Severe Morbidity,'" details a core problem with Pfizer's, Moderna's and Janssen's (Johnson & Johnson) trials.
All three employ a surrogate primary endpoint for health, namely "severe infections with COVID-19." This, Classen says, "has been proven dangerously misleading," and many fields of medicine have stopped using disease-specific endpoints in clinical trials and have adopted "all-cause mortality and morbidity" instead.
The reason for this is because if a person dies from the treatment or is severely injured by it, even if the treatment helped block the progression of the disease they're being treated for, the end result is still a negative one.
To offer an extreme example of what you can do with a disease-specific endpoint, you could make the claim that shooting people in the head is a cure for cancer, because no one who got the treatment — who got shot in the head — died from cancer.
When reanalyzing the clinical trial data from these COVID shots using "all-cause severe morbidity" as the primary endpoint, the data reveal they actually cause far more harm than good.
The proper endpoint was calculated by adding together all severe events reported in the trials, not just COVID-19 but also all other serious adverse events. By doing this, severe COVID-19 infection gets the same weight as other adverse events of equivalent severity. According to Classen:36
"Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statistically significant increase in 'all cause severe morbidity' in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.
The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 more severe events than the control group. The Pfizer data was grossly incomplete but data provided showed the vaccination group suffered 90 more severe events than the control group, when only including 'unsolicited' adverse events.
The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 more severe events than the control group. These findings contrast the manufacturers' inappropriate surrogate endpoints:
Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 cases of severe COVID-19 requiring medical attention out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized.
Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe."
To make the above numbers more clear and obvious, here are the prevention stats in percentages:
  • Pfizer 0.00036%
  • Moderna 0.00125%
  • Janssen 0.00030%

Where Do We Go From Here?​

If you've already gotten one or two shots, there's nothing you can do about that. It seems pretty obvious, though, if you objectively analyze the data, that your best bet is to say no to any and all future boosters, as each additional shot can magnify the damage and increase your risk of serious side effects.
If you develop symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there are several treatment protocols available that have been shown to be effective. Options include the Zelenko protocol,37 the MATH+ protocols38 and nebulized hydrogen peroxide, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein's case paper39 and Dr. Thomas Levy's free e-book, "Rapid Virus Recovery."
Whichever treatment protocol you use, make sure you begin treatment as soon as possible, ideally at first onset of symptoms. Also, realize that if you've gotten one or more COVID shots, your risk of severe infection may actually be greater, not lesser, than had you not gotten the injections. This appears particularly true if you're over the age of 50. So, do not delay treatment if you develop symptoms.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

Medical Boards Hunting Down Doctors Over Mask Mandates

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked


doctors targeted for questioning mandatory masking

STORY AT-A-GLANCE -​

  • Dr. Jeremy Henrichs, a member of the Mahomet-Seymour school board and a physician for the University of Illinois Athletic Department, was targeted by state investigators due to his opposition to mandatory masks
  • Henrichs’ support of optional masking led to a complaint being filed, at which point the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) opened an investigation to do their “due diligence”
  • An email from a medical investigator asked Henrichs for a “detailed statement on your opinion about masks, and whether you support and will enforce a mask mandate based on your elected position as a school board member”
  • An attorney for Henrichs questioned whether the investigation had legal standing and suggested it was an attempt to “coerce or intimidate a public official in the performance of his public duties”
  • The IDFPR investigation has since been called a “frightening abuse of power” by state Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, who filed a complaint in response and asked the Office of the Executive Inspector General to investigate the case
  • After backlash, the agency issued a letter of apology to Henrichs, backpedaling on their inquiry
Dr. Jeremy Henrichs, a member of the Mahomet-Seymour school board and a physician for the University of Illinois Athletic Department, was targeted by state investigators who said they had opened an official investigation due to his opposition to mandatory masks in classrooms.1
The chilling governmental overreach is just the latest example of state and federal governments attempting to intimidate and silence those who question mask mandates and other official COVID-19 responses. Henrichs had previously voted in favor of a plan that would make mask usage optional unless infection rates rose quickly — at which point mandatory masks would be reimposed.
However, due to updated CDC guidelines recommending masks for all students, the state enacted a statewide school mask mandate requiring masks for all students in class. Henrichs’ support of optional masking led to a complaint being filed, at which point the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) opened an investigation to do their “due diligence.”2

State Uses Coercion and Intimidation Tactics​

August 11, 2021, Henrichs received an email from a medical investigator asking for a “detailed statement on your opinion about masks, and whether you support and will enforce a mask mandate based on your elected position as a school board member.”3 “This would fall under the unprofessional-conduct part of the Medical Practice Act,” the email added.4
It’s unclear at what point during the pandemic having an opinion contrary to the “official” rhetoric became reason for investigation, but we’re well past that point now. An attorney for Henrichs responded, questioning whether the investigation had legal standing and suggesting it was an attempt to “coerce or intimidate a public official in the performance of his public duties.”

State law prohibits the intimidation of public officials going about their official duties, but IDFPR investigators said they are required to investigate every complaint about a medical professional. Why Henrichs’ opinions on masks are open for investigation is another issue entirely.
In an email, a state investigator stated, “What the medical disciplinary board wants to know is if the doctor will support and enforce the mask mandate by the governor.” An IDFPR spokesperson also stated in an email, as reported by WCIA news:5
“IDFPR takes all allegations against licensees seriously. Complaints filed with the Department, as well as investigations undertaken by the Department, are confidential, unless and until a public complaint or discipline is issued by the Department. If the Department determines a physician violated the Medical Practice Act, an appropriate course of action will be taken.”

Targeted for Questioning Mandatory Masking​

The IDFPR investigation has since been called a “frightening abuse of power” by Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, who filed a complaint in response and asked the Office of the Executive Inspector General to investigate the case.6 In a statement, Henrichs called the overreach a direct threat:7
"I have considered authoritative medical evidence that questions the necessity of mandatory masking in our schools. As a result, the IDPFR has threatened my medical licensure unless I expressly support and enforce a mask mandate for all students. The IDPFR has commanded me to 'toe the line' or suffer personal and professional consequences.
The IDPFR's actions constitute a direct threat from the state to the well-being of my family and all board members to freely and independently exercise the duties of elected office.”
Other regulatory bodies have issued similar threats and warnings attempting to silence physicians. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), which regulates the practice of medicine in Ontario, is among them. In April 2021, it issued a statement prohibiting physicians from making comments or providing advice that goes against the official narrative.
According to CPSO, physicians, in isolated incidents, have been spreading blatant “misinformation” via social media, which is undermining “public health measures meant to protect all of us.” In response, they released their “Statement on Public Health Misinformation” on April 30, 2021, which reads:8
“The College is aware and concerned about the increase of misinformation circulating on social media and other platforms regarding physicians who are publicly contradicting public health orders and recommendations.
Physicians hold a unique position of trust with the public and have a professional responsibility to not communicate anti-vaccine, anti-masking, anti-distancing and anti-lockdown statements and/or promoting unsupported, unproven treatments for COVID-19.
Physicians must not make comments or provide advice that encourages the public to act contrary to public health orders and recommendations. Physicians who put the public at risk may face an investigation by the CPSO and disciplinary action, when warranted.
When offering opinions, physicians must be guided by the law, regulatory standards, and the code of ethics and professional conduct. The information shared must not be misleading or deceptive and must be supported by available evidence and science.”
While threatening physicians with investigation and disciplinary action should they speak out regarding the many inconsistencies and questions surrounding pandemic lockdowns, masks and COVID-19 vaccines, CPSO had the gall to add that it’s not intending to stifle healthy public debate about how to “best address aspects of the pandemic.” “Rather, our focus is on addressing those arguments that reject scientific evidence and seek to rouse emotions over reason,” it added.9

IDFPR Issues Apology to Henrichs​

After backlash, including Rose’s call for an investigation into IDFPR’s actions, the agency issued a letter of apology to Henrichs, backpedaling on their inquiry. In an email to Henrichs’ attorney, Dina Torrisi Martin, general counsel for IDFPR, stated:10
“The initial response to your inquiry requested information that the Department does not need. Please disregard the questions posed in the emails of August 11 and 17, 2021. On behalf of the Department, I sincerely apologize for the tone and content of those communications.
I would like to provide context for the Department’s approach to complaints. Pursuant to its duties under the Medical Practice Act, 225 ILCS 60, for years, the Department has generally maintained a practice of opening an investigation of every complaint it receives relating to individuals licensed by the Department.
As you can understand, not every complaint requires a detailed investigation or action; however, that determination cannot be made at the time of the initial filing.”
Mario Treto Jr., IDFPR’s secretary, also stated that a preliminary review of the complaint has concluded with the strong recommendation that the complaint be closed. In a statement, Henrichs said he appreciated the apology, but “until this complaint has, in fact, formally been dismissed,” he has “nothing further to say at this time.”11

State Boards Threaten Licenses, Don’t Define ‘Misinformation’​

A spokeswoman for Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Jordan Abudayyeh, stated, “The Pritzker administration has not and will not seek disciplinary action against the professional licenses of individuals who disagree with the mask mandate.”12 Yet, according to a statement released by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), they absolutely could.
In a news release titled, “Spreading COVID-19 Misinformation May Put Medical License at Risk,” FSMB stated that the “dramatic increase in the dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine 'misinformation' and 'disinformation' by physicians and other health care professionals on social media platforms, online and in the media” led to the release of their latest threat, which they called a “statement”:13,14
“Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license.
Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not.
They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health.
Spreading inaccurate COVID-19 vaccine information contradicts that responsibility, threatens to further erode public trust in the medical profession and puts all patients at risk.”
Markedly absent from the statement is a definition of what constitutes “misinformation,” leaving the word wide open for interpretation. It’s not only physicians that are being hunted down but also academics.
Virtually anyone who speaks out about data that go against the official COVID propaganda can be labeled a dangerous “agent of misinformation,” which is what happened to Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff, who wrote a paper against lockdowns but couldn’t get it published.
Kulldorff and colleagues soon banded together to write the Great Barrington Declaration,15 which calls for “focused protection” of the elderly and those in nursing homes and hospitals, while allowing businesses and schools to remain open. Soon after, they too were attacked and accused of spreading misinformation and being “COVID deniers.”16
Professor Mark Crispin Miller, who has taught classes on mass persuasion and propaganda at the New York University Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development for the last two decades, is another example. After challenging students to investigate current propaganda narratives surrounding mask mandates, Miller was placed under conduct review for spreading “dangerous misinformation.”
Miller fought back, suing 19 of his department colleagues for libel after they signed a letter to the school dean demanding a review of Miller’s conduct.17 Miller also launched a petition to New York University in support of academic freedom, free speech and free inquiry, without which he states, “‘education’ … will be mere training for compliance, stunting students’ minds instead of opening them — a practice fatal to democracy, and, finally, to humanity itself.”18

Are State Boards Maintaining Hit Lists?​

Jumping on the libel bandwagon, MedPage Today conducted an investigation into 20 physicians it says are spreading “COVID-19 misinformation,” including me, noting that “not one of 20 physicians who've peddled such falsehoods has been disciplined by their state licensing agency for doing so.”19
MedPage Today contacted 10 states that license physicians, apparently to ask them why they haven’t disciplined physicians for spreading undefined “misinformation.” In Illinois, IDFPR stated that if the agency "determines a licensee committed violations against the Act that regulates their profession, an appropriate course of action will be taken.
Complaints filed with and investigations undertaken by IDFPR are confidential, unless and until a public complaint or discipline is issued by the Department."20
From MedPage Today’s investigation, it seems that states have put together lists of the people they’re targeting to delicense, but none has taken action against the physicians they’re accusing of spreading unidentified “bad info.” Perhaps that’s because sharing information isn’t a crime, but stifling it — and engaging in unfounded threats and intimidation — is.
 
Last edited:

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

by Jon Rappoport​

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)​

It’ll be the California of East Germany if the people don’t act now:

I’m talking about large visible protests on all levels. Including in the streets.

The LA Times has the story: “…state lawmakers are now considering one of the most politically challenging government mandates yet: requiring Californians to show proof of vaccination to enter many indoor business establishments and forcing workers to get vaccinated or regularly tested.”

“[State Senator Richard Pan said] there is enough uncertainty about what will happen in the coming months to potentially reach a consensus to act now. Lawmakers wrap up their session on Sept. 10. [Governor] Newsom faces a recall election on Sept. 14.”

“The Times obtained a draft of [Assembly Bill] AB 455, which was dated Thursday. That version calls for anyone entering a bar, restaurant, gym, hotel, event center or sports arena to show proof that he or she is fully vaccinated.”

“It also calls for all employees, job applicants and independent contractors to show proof that they are fully vaccinated or take a weekly COVID-19 test with proof of a negative result.” READ THAT SENTENCE AGAIN.

“Those who are too young to be vaccinated or a person with a valid medical reason would be exempt from the provisions, according to the draft language. The California Department of Public Health would be tasked with determining by Nov. 1 how to enforce the requirements.”

“The draft bill is listed as an urgency measure, which would allow it to take effect immediately if passed by two-thirds of lawmakers and signed by the governor.”

Don’t assume getting a medical exemption is going to fly. The California Medical Board has been coming down very hard on doctors who write exemptions.

Parents who’ve decided to take the vaccine for whatever reason---and have kids who are old enough to be required to take it---those parents would have to plan on leaving the kids at home or in the car whenever they visit a place that demands a vaccine passport, unless they’re willing to have their kids hit with the vaccine.

This IS the Medical Police State. The enemies of freedom, sanity, and humanity have been planning vaccine mandates for A LONG TIME. They were waiting for full FDA approval of the shot, which took place on August 23rd.

We’re under jackboot tyranny.

RESIST!

~~~​
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258

Refusing the COVID vaccine; setting the record straight


In my MANY articles about vaccines, detailing how they are dangerous, destructive, ineffective, and unnecessary, my aim has been to bring people closer to making their own stand.

That is what this is all about: No Matter What.

It’s a test of faith, conviction, courage.

Will you refuse the vaccine no matter what?

Believe me, I support all sorts of legal case filings and challenges to vaccine mandates. I don’t care how slim the chances of success are.

But in the end, every individual has to decide what he will accept and what he will reject.

No matter what the consequences are.

We are the cure. This is the war.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains
No offence’Hedge but that was 10 lbs of shit stuffed in a 5 lb bag.
I had a Secret clearance and worked for a military contractor. I also have background in electronics and IT. I’m calling BS on half of that podcast. Verbal diarrhea at it’s best.

To be fair to GH and others, it's become very difficult to know what's truth and what's bullshit these days. Both sides are pumping out propaganda like it's going out of style. The best we can all do is takes it all with a grain of salt. Until something actually happens, it's only a rumor!
I post it, you guys get to debunk it.

We all can't be experts which is why the brain trust here is so important to preserve.

Thanks for the debunk!
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
11,258
Wow, first we find out about magnets sticking to covid vaccine injection sites. Then we find out about Graphene oxide in the shots. Then we find that Graphene oxide is on the tips of the probes they tickle your brain with when tested.

Now Graphene oxide is discovered in the masks...


This is not a joke; it’s real​

by Jon Rappoport​

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)​

Graphenea[dot]com: “Graphene is the thinnest compound known to man at one atom thick, the lightest material known…the strongest compound [ever] discovered…the best conductor of heat at room temperature…the best conductor of electricity known...potentially an eco-friendly, sustainable solution for an almost limitless number of applications. Since the discovery…of graphene, applications within different scientific disciplines have exploded, with huge gains being made particularly in high-frequency electronics, bio, chemical and magnetic sensors, ultra-wide bandwidth photodetectors, and energy storage and generation.”

---I’ll get to the “anti-anxiety” effects of graphene on the brain in a minute; first a review of the lung issues.

On April 2, 2021, Health Canada issued an advisory, warning people not to “use face masks labelled to contain graphene or biomass graphene.”

Andrew Maynard covers this issue in a medium[dot]com article, “Manufacturers have been using nanotechnology-derived graphene in face masks---now there are safety concerns.”

Those concerns? Masks could create lung problems.

Maynard’s article traces the safety concerns to a Chinese mask manufacturer, Shandong, but points out that millions of graphene-containing masks are in use around the world, produced by a whole host of companies.

Recently, I saw a mask sold to a customer. It was sealed in a plain plastic bag. No manufacturer’s name, no list of materials in the mask, nothing but a bar code. Does the mask contain graphene? No way to know.

The mainstream literature on graphene is ambiguous and far from reassuring: ‘yes, it’s probably toxic to the lungs; perhaps not seriously so; perhaps only temporarily; there are more questions than answers.’

Why have these masks been certified anywhere in the world for public use? Why haven’t the CDC and the WHO made definitive statements about safety concerns? Why didn’t public health agencies, long ago, run/demand definitive tests to see whether, and to what extent, the nanoparticles of graphene detach themselves from various types of masks and enter the body?

At materialstoday[dot]com, we have, “Is graphene safe?”

“But, it is the very nature of graphene that might be cause for concern: thin and lightweight, yet tough and intractable particles are notoriously worrisome in terms of the detrimental effects they can have on our health, particularly when breathed in…”

“Ken Donaldson is a respiratory toxicologist at the University of Edinburgh and he and his colleagues are among the first to raise the warning flag on graphene, at least for nanoscopic platelets of the material. It is not too great a leap of the imagination to imagine how such tiny flakes of carbon might be transported deep within the lungs similar to asbestos fibres and coal dust. Once lodged within, there is no likely mechanism for the removal or break down of such inert particles and they might reside on these sensitive tissues triggering a chronic inflammatory response or interfering with the normal cellular functions.”

Does this make any sane person feel safe about wearing a mask containing graphene particles?

“We have a new idea and a new product. It’s designed to force you to breathe in nanoparticles of graphene. Who knows what’ll happen? Try it and see.”

~~~

And now, on top of all that---Are millions of people walking around in a sedated dumbed-down haze, because they’re wearing masks?

(Yes, I know some researchers are making the claim that graphene oxide is contained in COVID vaccines. Their findings definitely call out for further investigation and confirmation.)

A large consortium, funded by the European Union, is conducting research on graphene oxide as an anxiety-reversal agent which affects the brain. The consortium is Graphene Flagship. They write:

“The Graphene Flagship is, along with the Human Brain Project, the first of the European Commission's Future and Emerging Technology Flagships, whose mission is to address the big scientific and technological challenges of the age through long-term, multidisciplinary research and development efforts.”

They have published an article, “Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide.” Here are key quotes:

“Researchers from Graphene Flagship partners SISSA in Italy, ICN2 in Spain and the University of Manchester in the UK, in collaboration with the Ribeirão Preto Medical School of the University of São Paulo, have discovered that graphene oxide inhibits anxiety-related behaviours in a model study. They found that injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the brain silences the neurons responsible for anxious behaviour.”

“Laura Ballerini, lead author of the paper and Professor of Physiology at Graphene Flagship partner SISSA, Italy, explains that graphene oxide disables communication between the synapses that cause this type of fear.”

“…’Two days after injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the mouse’s brain, it behaved like other mice that had never experienced the smell of a cat in their home environment. In other words, graphene oxide inhibited the mouse’s anxiety-related behaviour,’ Ballerini explains.”

“Graphene oxide interrupts anxiety-related neuron signals without affecting the neurons, or the surrounding cells. In simple terms, it only ‘turns down’ the communications between specific neurons. In a disease where these communications are over-expressed, like PTSD and anxiety, targeting the synapses with graphene oxide is enough to halt the development of this pathological behaviour. This is a type of precision medicine.”

“Graphene oxide is naturally eliminated after a few days, as the surrounding tissue digests the material. Ballerini says that, after two days, they did not observe any inflammation, and no traces of graphene oxide remained at all.”

What happens when you walk around all day, day after day, breathing in graphene through a mask?

What happens to your lungs? To your brain? To your feelings? To the quality of your thoughts?

“ANXIOUS ABOUT COVID? ABOUT THE VACCINE? ABOUT YOUR JOB, YOUR FINANCES, YOUR FUTURE? TRY OUR GRAPHENE MASK. IT’LL SOOTHE YOU AND HELP YOU SURENDER TO REALITY AS IT IS, NO MATTER HOW BAD IT GETS, WITHOUT FEAR.”

In keeping with local laws, I’ve applied for a license to own a mask as a weapon. If I gain approval, I plan to seal it in a glass box and mount it on the wall next to my grenade launcher and Civil War cannonball.​
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
GFt-0639.jpg


Pretending COVID Is An Emergency Is Killing America
By Molly McCann - AUGUST 30, 2021​
 

EO 11110

UNBANNED
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
19,662
Reaction score
20,093
Location
clown world
1630354960245.png
 

Uncle

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
3,147
Reaction score
6,244
Location
SA
Ripped from Telegram and I'm no doctor so DYODD.

Start

Video: Dr Ardis exposing the USA, CDC's own website, that reveals that COVID 19 Shots and Flu Shots will cause a "Polio Like Paralyzing Disease".

Video link :https://rumble.com/vlsf6b-dr-ardis-shocking-news.html

What the CDC is doing is again, criminal.

They have DIFFERENT NAMES FOR DISEASES the same way they are calling Pfizer now Comirnaty, a way to CHEAT the people about the truth.

So if you hear about ACUTE FLACID MYELITIS, this in fact, is the same name for these diseases:

- Guillain Barre Syndrome

- Acute flaccid PARALYSIS (caused by the POLIO VACCINE, just check CDC files, I'll put a link below).

These are all THE SAME disease.

40% of the people getting Guillain Barre Syndrome (AKA Acute Flacid Myelitis) NEVER RECOVER. They are DAMAGED FOR LIFE.

Remember all the videos we see of people with severe neurological symptoms, facial paralysis, body paralysis, muscle weakness by HUNDREDS in the internet??

These are ALL GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME.

The CDC knows about it very well. It's a known VACCINE SIDE EFFECT.

The CDC sent to ALL HOSPITALS in the USA a letter saying that this AUTUMN, there will be LOADS of CHILDREN, average 5 years old, falling down with Acute Flacid Myelitis.

They want DOCTORS to call that AFM, not GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME!!!

WATCH OUT PARENTS: This neuro syndrome can handicap your child for life.

And it will be EITHER CAUSED by the Covid vaccine Pfizer approved for the small children (the FDA will approve it, probably, sometime soon).

.... OR....

... it will be caused by the 5 flu shots that have ALREADY BEEN APPROVED.

They are EITHER POISONING your children with the FLU SHOTS or the COVID SHOTS.

Here is the link to POLIO CAUSED BY VACCINES DISEASE.


Below the link to the Acute Flacid Myelitis (the same as above, and the same as Guillain Barre Syndrome):


You can read about Guillain Barre Syndrome here (and discover, it's the same disease):


End

Golden Regards
Uncle
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
61,498
Reaction score
130,426
Location
Rocky Mountains
neverhadaboss.com updates on the insane world of money and power

Antibody Dependent Enhancement—A Study in Stupidity—Or Evil?

In the 1950's the carnival and carnies came to town and for a few days and nights we would be treated to a brightly-lit midway of fresh sawdust and dizzying rides to test young digestive systems—at keeping-down hot dogs and candy-floss. Carnivals brought with them an expectation they would 'grift' us out of our newspaper route earnings, at so-called 'games of chance' intended to make 'chumps' (gullible locals), into victims rather than players, to be separated, unaware, from their hard-earned dough.

The fun of a carnival obscured that it was a business with a financial 'nut' to crack— one that began with an 'advance man', flashing a 'carney roll' with a couple of big bills obscuring the singles below, who came ahead to secure logistics and pay the 'juice' (bribes), to avoid 'heat' from authorities. The carnival, owned by a 'showman', used an 'outside talker ballyhoo' to draw in the crowd, offering a free first shot at a bullseye, but using a 'gaff' (mechanism to control the game). Carnivals used rules of the road: no stealing from 'punks' (kids)—keep the 'beefs' (complaints) manageable, using 'cool outs' to convince the 'chumps' you didn't steal their money. While avoiding 'cowboys' (troublemakers coming to the aid of chumps), by '86-ing' (banning) them.

The carnival was more or less a harmless game—run by 'grifters', with the authorities keeping it all in check. Besides, they were soon gone, leaving folks a bit light in the wallet, with only a patch of flattened, brown grass where a midway had once been.

Carnivals are now distant memories, replaced with a new 'circus of horrors', built around a modern 'grift'—ADE—'antibody dependent enhancement'. What is that? It's vaccines, which historically were developed using a protocol, testing span of years—5 to ascertain they brought no cancers, and 7 to assure no auto-immune consequences.

In the early days of polio and smallpox, they came as saviors, then they morphed into Big Pharma business to become the bane of mothers who didn't want their 'punks' injected with who-knows-what, 35 or 50 times, before they could go to school. All for illnesses our parents purposely made us contract as kids, to acquire natural antibodies.

As the size and power of government grew, in a cozy fascist arrangement with Big Pharma, the process attained a level of 'batshit', where it was difficult to make clear whether the 'showman' was now the government, or the corporations, or both. A closer look showed the infrastructure of the carnival to be intact and in use. The 'advance man' had been planning logistics for decades, out front of a push for ADE to come to town. Now he was standing there, right next to the president, offering his message that a million years of natural immunity was about to be handed-over to Pharma. And we would no longer have to rely on what had kept us alive for all of human history.

Is this a con-job and are we the 'chumps'? Has 'juice' been paid-out to avoid the 'heat', to keep 'beefs' manageable, offering us 'cool-outs' for an unseen 'gaff', and 'cancelling' virologist 'cowboys', who bring the data and do not support that 'the greatest show on earth' must go on? This isn't as complicated as it seems—let's break it down.

Because safety protocols have been tossed aside, the motivation for this 'circus of horror' is either stupidity, greed, evil, or all. Here are the purported facts—you decide.

As with the 'shooting gallery', 'the first shot is free.' But is it? Just who is paying the multi-billions for the 'jabs'? Taxpayers are on the hook for these jabs and any boosters. And how is it that more than $3 trillion has allegedly been spent on advertising the 'vaccines', but only one autopsy has been granted on deaths due to vaccinations?

This is not a vaccine approval—this is a marketing license. The FDA promised transparency in its certification process—then did it behind closed doors. With no studies for the booster, on cancer or auto-immune, or pregnant women, or transferability in breast milk. They looked at all the data? Where are the VAERS results? On the low end, for the US, we have 13,000 deaths. 55,000 hospitalizations, 73,000 urgent-care visits, directly attributed to the 'vaccines'—which are not mentioned in the certification.

Israel is highly 'vaccinated', and some months ahead of us in reporting that near 90% of present Israeli hospital cases are among the 'vaccinated'—all of which are Delta. Since only 7% of US trails reached 6 months, and only after 6 months Israeli trials show 39% effectiveness for Covid mRNA, which then falls to 16%, why is the US mandating a 'vaccine', not effective for Covid, and arguably, of little or no use for Delta? Since trials for the 'booster' were conducted on Covid, what kind of madness is this?

It gets worse: the booster is the 'exact-same' vaccine—with no need for further trials. Any lack of efficacy in the first 'vaccine' is in the second. And, the US does not recognize natural antibodies acquired from having had Covid, which are 13 times superior to the 'vaccines' at their highest immune efficacy levels (Israeli findings). Acquired antibodies are there for all time while those from mRNA lose efficiency with each day.

What about the 'punks'? Our children will be mandated to take a 'vaccine', which for them is statistically more lethal than the disease (more boys have allegedly died from inflammation of the heart cause by the vaccine than all youngsters dies from Covid).

The 'vaccines' are failing, and just as the economy needs propped-up a few months at a time with 'injections' of trillions, a looming medical failure needs 'boosters' of 'exactly the same' to hide a coming catastrophe. Using 'boosters' that are not new—no biological differences—only legal differences. Which don't meet post-6 month approval criteria, but are needed because, after 2 doses, the host has 6 times less 'neutralizing' antibodies (intruder attackers), and Delta can now evade the protection promised with 'vaccines'. Leaving a vaccinated person more susceptible to new viral variations.

Is it fair to say that supporting 'vaccines', one has either been duped—or is complicit in a tyranny? Are we walking a 'midway of evil', which unlike carnivals—brings back Groucho Marx, with a wink of an eye, announcing the real show: "You Bet Your Life"!


Please suggest my articles to friends who can get on my email list by request: erik@neverhadaboss.com. My fiction is online at neverhadaboss.com. Thank you.
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,479
Reaction score
27,424
Make A Stand (1 min 43 sec):

Published August 18, 2021 by Dr. Simone Gold​
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
8,984
Reaction score
12,875
Ah, when the carnies came to town, with the men's only admission to the Mexican woman's donkey tent...
Now there's the internet...