• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
15,239
I can barely type so very little to drink...... sorry. Days turn into nights turn into a few days ago. That's why dates & times of taking meds would be a good idea.

Another think I did was have a bunch of foam 8oz cups. Use them once & pitch them along with plastic silverware to get rid of germs.

Had been on daily preventative
1000 C
10000 D3
100 B
50 Zink
75mg aspirin
1 mens daily multivitamin.


1st and 15th of month I was doing my ivermectin paste.

When I got sick I added 600 NAC. Off it now as I think it's messing up my vision.

When I got sick I doubled
Zink to 100
Used more aspirin as I have headaches.
Ivermectin twice daily like the I mask calls for.

So my guess is I was getting it around Oct 13th.
Oct 15th went to bed & didn't really get out.
I did soak in a cool bath a few times. Would have killed for a soaking tub.
Sweats broke out 21st-24th.
Slept 20 hrs a day until Oct 23 when I was up for 8 -10 hrs.
Now I'm awake but not really active but moving, eating a lot more (not much) etc......

No antibiotics then?...
That's part of some of the "treatment protocols" I've looked at... either Doxicyclin or Azithromicin... to prevent bacterial infection from setting in...
Otherwise, you seem to be "doing it from the book"...
Perhaps some testing to see if you have any other "bug" or "medical condition" ASIDE from covid? (Appendix? Urinary Tract? Who knows? - Fever that long makes me think antibiotics are needed... but I'm no MD...)
 

Scorpio

для продажи слегка подержанный
Founding Member
Board Elder
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
33,339
Reaction score
54,224
TEXAS black robe tosses southwest unions request to block vax mandate

stated it furthers the goal of the collective bargaining,
that it accomplishes safety and security of workers and passengers

in Kty terms, hump up and take it


which again shows the point of how useless the black robes are,
for the life of me I cannot fathom how people continue to lay hope on the judiciary
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains
that it accomplishes safety and security of workers and passengers
What I find perplexing is the ease at which everyone assumes that this jab is actually a vaccine.

There is plenty of factual evidence to the contrary that they refuse to consider.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains

COVID-19: Science-Based Information

pexels-photo-256262-e1635174887891.jpeg

Before explaining why they happened, let’s briefly look at some of the horrific — and entirely preventable — US consequences of the mishandling of COVID-19:

— Hundreds of thousands of Americans are needlessly dying,

— Our economy is being undermined, with Trillions of dollars being wasted, and

— We are lurching towards Communism, as dozens of hard fought for liberties and civil rights are being extracted.


But haven’t we been dealing with a disease of unprecedented historical proportions? NO! See this visual comparison of prior pandemics — and be aware that this shows an inflated death toll for COVID-19. (For example, the majority of COVID-19 deaths were preventable!)

The question now is: have we learned our lesson here, or does it have to get even worse before we wake up? The lesson to be learned comes from understanding how this tragedy came about…
—————————————-
The term “Science” is bandied about continuously. The obvious reason why is that when a product or agenda is officially endorsed by “Science,” it’s like getting the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.

The problem is that 95%+ of the public (including legislators), have almost no idea what “Science” actually is. This leaves the stage open to a wide-variety of bad actors to step in and make false Science claims — knowing that very few will be aware of the deceit. Fewer yet will have the knowledge, time and commitment to publicly challenge these inaccurate Science assertions.

As a professional scientist for 50+ years, let me try to clarify some of the confusion. The best definition for Science is: Science is a Process, and the most recognized Science process is the Scientific Method.

Once we’ve grasped that, it’s then critically important to understand that Science exists for one reason: to give us objective, competent assistance in solving our technical problems (e.g., like COVID-19).

Because of this powerful influence, there is a wide range of Science wanna-be’s. However, if we are paying careful attention, we can discard the pretenders when we see that they do NOT follow scientific protocol. Today, the biggest threat to real Science is political science. (Of course, having the word “Science” in the phrase is the first part of the deception.) Political science is actually just politics — but with a fancy name to make it sound more legitimate. Don’t be fooled.

We are being bombarded with numerous “politically correct” products (e.g., industrial wind energy) and agendas (e.g., climate change), parading about as if they are proven by Science. They are not!

So, it’s no surprise that COVID-19 policies have fallen prey to this anti-science (and anti-American) scourge. The bottom line is that self-serving parties will continue to use a strategy as long as it works. We need to expose the deviations from real Science in ALL of our technical policies — but here our focus is on COVID-19.

Below are some reports that should help you separate the wheat from the chaff. The first group are my small efforts at trying to educate the public about the charade we’ve found ourselves in. The second collection are some of the better materials I’ve come across from other parties. This isn’t an exhaustive list, but if you absorb what is here, you’ll be very knowledgeable about the unscientificness of most current COVID-19 policies.

One would think that as the guardians of their profession, that the Medical Establishment (FDA, CDC, WHO, AMA, NIH) would aggressively be defending their field from science pretenders. Unfortunately, regarding COVID-19, the Medical Establishment has become a part of the problem, rather than a part of the solution. That’s what my first report outlines.

The second report spells out the most egregious failing of the Medical Establishment regarding COVID-19: that they failed to advocate any science-based therapies, when there were several reasonable options — any of which were superior to doing nothing. (Note that each of my two Reports has over a hundred citations!)

Feel free to pass on any suggestions for improvements of any of my documents (additions, deletions or modifications). Please provide the scientific basis for any corrections. Also, to sign up for our popular, free every-two-weeks Media Balance Newsletter (which covers COVID to Climate and Elections to Energy), email physicist John Droz.

Report #1: Some Scientific Observations about the Medical Establishment’s Handling of COVID-19 (10-23-21)
Report #2: The FDA COVID-19 Drug Approval Process: Remdesivir vs Ivermectin (10-28-21)

RE COVID-19 INJECTIONS —

Table: COVID-19 “Vaccine” — Some Pros and Cons (10-13-21)
COVID-19 Vaccine: Safe & Effective? (8-21-21)
We Would Get a COVID-19 Vaccine, If… (9-29-21)
Responses to Some Mandate Promoter’s Positions (9-12-21)
Outline of Some Lawsuit Options for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Objectors (9-26-21)

MISC RE COVID-19 —

COVID-19: Prevention & Treatment Suggestions (3-2-21)
What Schools Should Do For COVID-19 (10-19-21)
Food For Thought: Comparing Climate Change to COVID-19 (9-1-21)
The Russian/ChinesePlan to Bring Us Down (2-25-20)


Some other worthwhile COVID-19 Reports, Documents and Commentaries:

RE COVID-19 THERAPIES —

Thorough list of scientific studies on 28 potential COVID-19 treatments (current)
Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19 when used early. Analysis of 63 studies (current)
Directories of Physicians who may prescribe Ivermectin: here, here and here (current)
Overcoming Barriers — Getting Ivermectin Prescriptions Filled (current)
I-MASK Early Outpatient Treatment for COVID-19 (9-1-21)
The FDA’s War Against the Truth on Ivermectin (10-18-21)
Report: India’s Ivermectin Blackout – The Secret Revealed (9-27-21)
Short Video: Dr. John Campbell discusses COVID-19 response by India (9-22-21)
Short Video: Dr. John Campbell: Ivermectin or Molnupiravir (10-5-21)
An extensive collection: COVID-19 Preventions and Treatments (current)

RE COVID-19 INJECTIONS —

Summary: Moderna Short-Term mRNA Injection Efficacy & Safety Data (current)
Summary: Pfizer Short-Term mRNA Injection Efficacy & Safety Data (current)
Summary: Johnson & Johnson Short-Term mRNA Injection Efficacy & Safety Data (current)
A site collecting data for adverse vaccine reactions: React-19 (current)
List of State laws, pending and enacted, regarding vaccination (current)
Study: Risk prediction of COVID-19 related death and hospital admission in adults after vaccination (9-17-21)*
Study: John Hopkins: Immunocompromised People — Fully Vaccinated and Not Protected (7-14-21)
Study: No Relationship Between Vaccinated People and New COVID-19 Cases (9-30-21)
Study: COVID-19 Vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals have similar viral loads (7-31-21)
Study: Some effects of mRNA vaccine on immune system (5-6-21)
80 of the most common adverse events reported after Covid-19 vaccination (current)
Exclusive Summary: COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns (current)
Safe & Effective? – 78% of COVID-19 deaths among Vaccinated (10-3-21)
Short Video: Israel’s Alarming Data (9-17-21)
Short Video: COVID-19 Vaccine Data From Singapore (9-25-21)
Short Video: Use common sense to do a COVID Data Comparison in 3 countries (9-16-21)
The Spartacus Letter (9-26-21)

RE COVID-19 INJECTION MANDATES —

Members of Congress and Their Staff Are Exempt From Biden’s Vaccine Mandate (9-17-21)
The Totalitarian Roots of Vaccine Mandates (9-2-21)
Some Resources to Stop Mandatory Vaccinations (8-26-21)
Study: Vaccinated healthcare workers carry 251x viral load of unvaccinated (8-24-21)
Individual Choice and Bodily Autonomy vs. Vaccine Mandates (8-22-21)
COVID-19 Mandates Will Not Work for the Delta Variant (8-29-21)
When Employers Practice Government Tyranny (8-13-21)

MISC RE COVID-19 —

Study: Durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection (7-20-21)
15 Studies: Acquired immunity from COVID infection is more robust than vaccines (8-25-21)
Excellent: Six COVID-19 facts we’re in danger of forgetting (9-15-21)
Open Letter from Healthcare Professionals (10-7-21)
COVID has Replaced Climate Change as the Religion of the Left (10-4-21)
COVID was a dress rehearsal for global climate change (8-12-21)
Short video: Have You Heard the Buffalo Paradox? (8-21-21)
Looking for a rapid COVID-19 test? A few things to know before you buy one (9-2-21)
How the Pandemic Is Changing the Norms of Science (9-8-21)
Fox guarding the henhouse? Yes, indeed! (9-27-21)
The smear campaign against the Great Barrington Declaration (8-2-21)
Report: The Masked Ball of Cowardice (8-29-21)
Video: Special Investigation — What Really Happened in Wuhan (9-27-21)

For more COVID-19 reports, etc, please search over the Media Balance Newsletter 2020 Archives & 2021 Archives.
* These are new references, added since the original posting of this page.


Note that nothing in this webpage should be misconstrued as giving medical advice.
We recommend that for all medical issues that citizens consult with a licensed physician.
For all medical decisions patients should become well-educated — including getting information from different perspectives — so that (with their physician) they can then make informed health decisions.
This is essentially what is spelled out in the Nuremberg Code.

 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819

— Hundreds of thousands of Americans are needlessly dying,

— Our economy is being undermined, with Trillions of dollars being wasted, and

— We are lurching towards Communism, as dozens of hard fought for liberties and civil rights are being extracted.

Other than that, we're good! :rage 1
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains
Glad you are feeling better.
Keep getting Better.
8 months later.

Doing great now. March 1st is when it hit.

Best advice I can offer is get active. Do something to make your lungs function.

I play pickleball. It's very aerobic. First time out I played 4 games gasping for breath. I'd make a few moves for the ball and I was gassed.

Breathing progressively got better over time.

I now can play for 3 hours no problem.
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,656
Reaction score
27,860

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
11,781

chieftain

Trump got them plump
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
4,994
Reaction score
8,337
So "The Lancet" with its recent track record of publishing garbage thinks that this piece will be swallowed whole:

 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819

Jodster

Always wrong
Silver Miner
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
1,859
The numbers are dropping because everybody’s dead at that point.
 

chieftain

Trump got them plump
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
4,994
Reaction score
8,337
A nurse has been sacked for telling the following story about vaccinations at one of Melbourne's hospitals.

During the past two weeks, there were over 2000 code blue alerts coming from the vaccination centre at this hospital. Code blue is reserved for cardiac arrests. In a normal week, they might have five.
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819
A nurse has been sacked for telling the following story about vaccinations at one of Melbourne's hospitals.

During the past two weeks, there were over 2000 code blue alerts coming from the vaccination centre at this hospital. Code blue is reserved for cardiac arrests. In a normal week, they might have five.
When will you Aussies start shooting these tyrants Chief? America is bad but Australia has become far worse!
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819
What if I told you we've already begun...?
I'd be pleased to hear it and even more pleased to see it catch on here in the states! These commies need a comeuppance!
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 7.30.32 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 7.32.19 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 7.32.38 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 7.33.03 PM.png
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
11,781

Pfizer Is Calling the Shots to Jab Kids

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE​

  • Public Citizen has reviewed and published the secret contracts between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U.S. and the U.K. The contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer, and in virtually all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests come first
  • Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, have put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings
  • The contracts not only secure Pfizer’s intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility onto the government purchasers. Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries
  • The contracts also give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement” without the written consent of the company. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U.S. government. The only difference is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties
  • October 26, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration voted to extend the emergency use of Pfizer’s COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11. Experts warn this is reckless and unnecessary, and will do far more harm than good, as COVID-19 poses no risk to young children
In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported1 that Pfizer was demanding countries put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation. While at least two countries, Argentina and Brazil, initially rejected the demands, calling them abusive, many others accepted Pfizer's terms from the start.
Public Citizen has now reviewed and published the secret contracts2,3 between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U.S. and the U.K. These contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer. In virtually all scenarios, Pfizer's interests come first.

Pfizer Is Calling the Shots​

Public Citizen points out six ways in which nations are allowing Pfizer to call the shots. For example, Albania, Brazil and Colombia have handed over unilateral authority to the company for the delivery schedule and other key decisions. As reported by Public Citizen:4
"As a condition to entering into the agreement, the Colombian government is required to 'demonstrate, in a manner satisfactory to Suppliers, that Suppliers and their affiliates will have adequate protection, as determined in Suppliers' sole discretion' … from liability claims.
Colombia is required to certify to Pfizer the value of the contingent obligations (i.e., potential future liability), and to start appropriating funds to cover the contingent obligations, according to a contribution program."
Pfizer also maintains tight control over vaccine supplies, and dictates who can buy their vaccine, when, and who can give and receive vaccine donations. If there are shortages, Pfizer decides which countries get priority.

Bypassing Pfizer can be costly. For example, if Brazil were to accept vaccine donations from another country without Pfizer's approval, the company can terminate the contract and force Brazil to pay the full prize for all remaining contracted doses. Meanwhile, Pfizer incurs no penalty if its delivery is late, even if it's so late that the shots are no longer needed.
Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, also ended up agreeing to Pfizer's demand to put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings.
In short, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer will be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it, so the company won't lose a dime if its COVID shot injures people — even if those injuries are the result of negligent company practices, fraud or malice!
At the same time, government purchasers must acknowledge that the effectiveness and safety of the shots are completely unknown. This is the ultimate corporate maleficence, using their leverage to force the kill shot down these countries' throats and avoiding any personal responsibility for damages.

Secret Arbitration​

The contracts also dictate how contractual disputes will be settled. As reported by Public Citizen:5
"What happens if the United Kingdom cannot resolve a contractual dispute with Pfizer? A secret panel of three private arbitrators — not a U.K court — is empowered under the contract to make the final decision. The arbitration is conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Both parties are required to keep everything secret:
'The Parties agree to keep confidential the existence of the arbitration, the arbitral proceedings, the submissions made by the Parties and the decisions made by the arbitral tribunal, including its awards, except as required by Law and to the extent not already in the public domain.'
The Albania draft contract and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, and Peru agreements require the governments to go further, with contractual disputes subject to ICC arbitration applying New York law. While ICC arbitration involving states is not uncommon, disputes involving high-income countries and/or pharmaceuticals appear to be relatively rare …
Private arbitration reflects an imbalance of power. It allows pharmaceutical corporations like Pfizer to bypass domestic legal processes. This consolidates corporate power and undermines the rule of law."

Pfizer Secured Intellectual Property Rights​

Amazingly, the contracts not only secure Pfizer's intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility away from Pfizer onto the government purchasers! What this means is that Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries.
"For example, if another vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian government to foot the bill," Public Citizen writes.6 "Pfizer also explicitly says that it does not guarantee that its product does not violate third-party IP, or that it needs additional licenses.
Pfizer takes no responsibility in these contracts for its potential infringement of intellectual property. In a sense, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. But internationally, Pfizer is fighting similar efforts to waive IP barriers for all manufacturers."

Pfizer Given Right to Silence Government​

Perhaps most egregious of all, some of the contracts give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making "any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement" without the written consent of the company.
The gag order also includes commenting on the government's relationship with Pfizer in general. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U.S. government. The only difference, Public Citizen notes, is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties.

Pfizer Can Prevent Use of Other Remedies​

Equally shocking, though, is that countries are forced to follow through on their vaccine orders even if other drugs or treatments emerge that can prevent, treat or cure COVID-19.7 Is it any wonder, then, that governments around the world have suppressed the use of drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?
If these drugs were allowed to be used and could be proven to work, the COVID injections would be completely unnecessary, yet governments are on the hook for hundreds of millions of doses. While COVID-19 vaccines are "free" to receive in the U.S., they're being paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.50 per dose. In Albania, the cost of each dose is $12, and in the EU, $14.70.
In the case of the price disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is said to have given a price break to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer — Master of Disaster Profiteering​

going broke tweet
As noted Public Citizen, Pfizer is being allowed to profit from this self-inflicted global disaster in unprecedented ways. In many instances, a nation's laws will not apply to Pfizer.
These secret contracts grant Pfizer total control over its product and ensures full payment, regardless of whether the shots are needed or usable, while simultaneously eliminating all liability. In short, Pfizer wins, no matter what the outcome of the vaccination campaign might be.
At the same time, Pfizer is also controlling media through its advertising dollars. As you've probably realized by now, media companies in most instances will not report on anything that might jeopardize the profits of its advertisers.
As illustrated in the short video above, it couldn't be more obvious that Pfizer is bankrolling the media, which in turn will refuse to bite the hand that feeds it. You can see the wide spectrum of media programming being sponsored by Pfizer, including "Nightline," "Making a Difference," "CNN Tonight," "Early Start," "Erin Burnett Out Front," "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," "CBS Sports," "Meet the Press," "CBS This Morning" and "60 Minutes."

Pfizer Study Shows Increased Mortality​

(Arminius note, cannot load the vid which should be here.)

The terms of these contracts are all the more disturbing when you consider how dangerous the Pfizer shot is turning out to be. No wonder the company refused to accept any liability.
As shown in the video above, Episode 3 in "The False Narrative Takedown Series"8 by Steve Kirsch, Pfizer's own Phase 3 six-month trial9 showed the shots increased all-cause mortality. More people actually died in the treatment group than in the placebo group.
According to Pfizer's own data, one COVID death per 20,000 fully vaccinated individuals is prevented. That means 10,000 lives are saved if 200 million are fully vaccinated.
But how many lives are lost from the shots? This is the other side of the equation that simply demands to be analyzed before any governmental authority can make a decision as to whether the mass vaccination campaign is of benefit or not.
Here, we find that Pfizer's data10 show the shots are actually killing more than they save. To look at this information yourself, click on "Supplementary Material" on the right-hand side of the paper, then, beside Supplementary Appendix, click on supplements/261159 and scroll down to page 12, Table S4.
In the vaccine group, 15 died; in the placebo group 14 died. Two people died from COVID-19 in the placebo group, while only one died from COVID pneumonia in the vaccine group. That's how you get a net false positive impact — one life is spared from COVID. However, the all-cause mortality was actually higher in the vaccine group (15, compared to 14).
So, while the shots saved one person from dying from COVID, they also killed one extra person. So, the net effect is nil. There's no mortality benefit at all. Other investigations using different data strongly suggest the net effect is profoundly negative, and the shots are doing FAR more harm than good.

We Face Looming Vaccine-Induced Public Health Catastrophe​

For this, Kirsch cites a paper11 by Dr. Bart Classen, published in the August 2021 issue of the journal Trends in Internal Medicine. Classen points out that Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are all using a "dangerously misleading" clinical trial design. The problem is that they're all using a surrogate endpoint for health, namely "severe infections with COVID-19."
Disease specific primary endpoints are no longer used in many fields of medicine, for the fact that it can hide problems. If a person dies from the treatment or is severely injured by it, even if the treatment helped block the progression of the disease they're being treated for, the end result is still a negative one.
For this reason, the appropriate endpoint that should be used is all-cause mortality and morbidity. When Classen reexamined the clinical trial data from all three manufacturers using all-cause severe morbidity as the endpoint, a disturbing picture emerged.
… it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe. ~ Dr. Bart Classen
As explained by Classen in his paper, "US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, 'All Cause Severe Morbidity'":12
"'All-cause severe morbidity' in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively.
This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statistically significant increase in 'all-cause severe morbidity' in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.
The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 more severe events than the control group. The Pfizer data was grossly incomplete but data provided showed the vaccination group suffered 90 more severe events than the control group, when only including 'unsolicited' adverse events.
The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 more severe events than the control group. These findings contrast the manufacturers' inappropriate surrogate endpoints:
Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 cases of severe COVID-19 requiring medical attention out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 cases of severe COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized.
Based on this data it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe."
To make the above numbers more clear and obvious, here are the prevention stats in percentages:
  • Pfizer 0.00036%
  • Moderna 0.00125%
  • Janssen 0.00030%

CDC Claims COVID Shots Lower All-Cause Mortality​

Despite all of that, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now claims Americans "vaccinated" against COVID-19 have lower all-cause mortality rates.13 As reported by Forbes:14
"Partially and fully vaccinated people died from non-coronavirus causes at a lower rate than their unvaccinated peers, according to the study,15 which looked at millions of patients at seven U.S. health organizations from December to July.
All three vaccines approved by U.S. regulators were tied to lower non-COVID death rates, though the difference in mortality among people who took Johnson & Johnson's vaccine was slightly smaller than for recipients of Pfizer or Moderna's vaccines …
This result suggests the vaccines don't increase a patient's risk of death, which 'reinforces the safety profile of currently approved COVID-19 vaccines,' the study said."

FDA Approves Jab for Young Children​

techno fog tweet
October 26, 2021, the FDA unanimously voted to grant emergency use approval of the COVID shots for children between the ages of 5 and 11.16 This despite acknowledging they have no idea what the long-term risk to children might be. As noted by one voting member, "We're never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it."17
All we have at present is two Pfizer trials, one in which 5- to 11-year-olds were followed for two months and another with just six weeks of follow-up. Both were too small to detect potential risks such as myocarditis. That won't be studied until AFTER the shot is authorized for children. As reported by The Defender:18
"Experts raised concerns over the lack of safety and efficacy data presented by Pfizer for use of its COVID vaccine in younger children, and they pointed to increasing safety signals based on reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). They also questioned the need to vaccinate children — whose risk of dying from COVID is "almost nil" — at all.
According to Dr. Meryl Nass, member of the Children's Health Defense Scientific Advisory Panel, Pfizer once again did not use all of the children who participated in the trial in their safety study.
'Three thousand children received Pfizer's COVID vaccine, but only 750 children were selectively included in the company's safety analysis,' Nass said.
'Studies in the 5-11 age group are essentially the same as the 12-15 group — in other words, equally brief and unsatisfying, with inadequate safety data and efficacy data, with no strong support for why this type of immuno-bridging analysis is sufficient … All serious adverse events were considered unrelated to the vaccine' …
Dr. Jessica Rose, viral immunologist and biologist, told the panel EUA of biological agents requires the existence of an emergency and the nonexistence of alternate treatment. 'There is no emergency and COVID-19 is exceedingly treatable,' Rose said.
In a peer-reviewed study19 co-authored by Rose, myocarditis rates were significantly higher in people 13 to 23 years old within eight weeks of the COVID vaccine rollout. In 12- to15-year-olds, Rose said, reported cases of myocarditis were 19 times higher than background rates …
Rose said tens of thousands of reports have been submitted to VAERS for children ages 0 to 18. Rose explained: 'In this age group, 60 children have died — 23 of them were less than 2 years old. It is disturbing to note that 'product administered to patient of inappropriate age' was filed 5,510 times in this age group. Two children were inappropriately injected, presumably by a trained medical professional, and subsequently died.'"
During the meeting, Dr. Cody Meissner noted we don't know whether the shot is safe for this age group, and the risk of COVID is extremely low. If the shot is authorized, mandates will likely follow, which would be "bad."
justin hart tweet
Brownstone Institute is also objecting to the authorization. In an October 20, 2021, article,20 Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., a former assistant professor of evidence-based medicine and research methods, called the plan to vaccinate young children "absolutely reckless" and "dangerous based on lack of safety data and poor research methodology."
Meanwhile, data show not a single child has died from COVID-19 who did not have a serious underlying health condition. Alexander reviews a lot of that data in his article.

Staggering Conflicts of Interest​

When you look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members21 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for children as young as 5, the unanimous “yes” vote becomes less of a mystery. As reported by National File,22 they have staggering conflicts of interest. Members include:
Gregg Sylvester — A former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines​
Arnold S. Monto — A paid Pfizer consultant​
Archana Chatterjee — A recent Pfizer research grant recipient​
Myron Levine — Mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer​
James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer vaccines​
Geeta Swamy — Chair of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program​
Steven Pergam — Proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine​
Several people who are already on the record supporting coronavirus vaccines for children, including Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton​
In addition to that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is currently on Pfizer’s board of directors.

FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Children​

With these shots now being pushed on young children, it's more imperative than ever to understand how data are being massaged and manipulated to support the ongoing lunacy. Of particular concern is evidence that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is burying data on children who were seriously injured in the vaccine trials. As reported by Aaron Siri on Substack:23
"Pfizer's clinical trial for children aged 12-15 included only 1,131 children who were vaccinated and at least one of those children suffered a devastating, life-altering injury which, despite incontrovertible proof and the cries of both the victim and her parents, has not been appropriately acknowledged by Pfizer or the FDA.
Putting aside that one serious injury in a small trial should alone raise blaring alarm bells, one must ask: what other serious adverse events have been hidden and ignored by regulators?"
Siri tells the story of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who along with her two brothers were enrolled by her parents in Pfizer's clinical trial. That decision has changed the lives of the entire family, possibly forever. Within 24 hours of her second dose, Maddie suffered crippling pain and systemic injuries.
Maddie is now wheelchair-bound and requires a feeding tube. Pfizer's principal investigator initially claimed Maddie's injuries were unrelated to the shot and treated her as a mental patient. Eventually, her injury was listed as "functional abdominal pain" in Pfizer's report to the FDA.
"For a virus that rarely harms children, the need to assure safety of the Covid-19 vaccine is high. A study with only 1,131 children is underpowered. It will not pick up anything but the most common adverse events.
If what Maddie suffered will occur in 1/1,000 children, that would result in 75,000 children in this country suffering this serious injury. If it happens 1/10,000 children, that is 7,500 suffering this serious injury.
It could be that the cure is worse than the disease. But that will only be known if there is a properly powered (a.k.a., sized) clinical trial with children," Siri writes, adding that:
"International scientists have declared that 'inadequately powered studies should themselves be considered a breach of ethical standards.'24 Without a clinical trial of sufficient size that reviews all potential adverse events, such as that experienced by Maddie, for a sufficient duration, this potentially catastrophic result will not be identified prior to authorization or licensure …
The real lesson is not that pharmaceutical companies, or the FDA should act better or do a better job. That just won't always be the case. The real lesson is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Never.
Preserving those rights to choose whether to get a medical product, without any government coercion, is the final and ultimate safeguard.
Removing that right results in dangerous authoritarianism because just as the FDA will not admit to Maddie's serious injury after having promoted this vaccine, politicians that mandate the vaccine will not want to later admit a mistake by repealing the mandate."

FDA Sued to Access COVID Jab Trial Data​

We're now in a position where it's near-impossible for many to refuse the COVID jab, and if injured, they cannot sue anyone for damages. Adding insult to injury, we don't even have access to all the data governments are supposedly relying on to mandate these hazardous products.
To address this last point, an organization called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is now suing25 the FDA after the agency refused to release the data on which it based its decision to approve Comirnaty.26
The FDA denied the PHMPT request for expedited processing of its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the basis that no "imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual" existed. Per the complaint:27
"… in an effort to ensure that the FDA acts in furtherance of its commitment to transparency, PHMPT seeks to obtain the data and information relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine.
The importance of releasing to the public this information is also recognized under federal law which provides that: 'After a license has been issued, the following data and information in the biological product file are immediately available for public disclosure unless extraordinary circumstances are shown: (1) All safety and effectiveness data and information. (2) A protocol for a test or study …'"

'Just Say No' to the COVID Shot​


While U.S. authorities are doing their best to hide incriminating data and manipulating the rest to show some sort of benefit, common sense, medical facts and available data all point in the opposite direction. It's crystal clear to me that children do not need the COVID shot, as their risk of serious COVID-19 infection and death is virtually nonexistent.
On the other hand, children are quite likely to be seriously injured by these injections. The reason you're not getting the truth from the media is explained by Dr. Peter McCullough in the video above. In short, it's a planned propaganda campaign — "the promotion of false information by the people in charge."
According to McCullough, anyone under the age of 50 has a less than 1% chance of a bad outcome if they come down with COVID-19. "Why would you take the vaccine?" he asks. "My advice," he says, "is just say no to this [shot], especially young people who are not at risk."
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
15,239

Pfizer Is Calling the Shots to Jab Kids

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

STORY AT-A-GLANCE​

  • Public Citizen has reviewed and published the secret contracts between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U.S. and the U.K. The contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer, and in virtually all scenarios, Pfizer’s interests come first
  • Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, have put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings
  • The contracts not only secure Pfizer’s intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility onto the government purchasers. Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries
  • The contracts also give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making “any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement” without the written consent of the company. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U.S. government. The only difference is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties
  • October 26, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration voted to extend the emergency use of Pfizer’s COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11. Experts warn this is reckless and unnecessary, and will do far more harm than good, as COVID-19 poses no risk to young children
In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported1 that Pfizer was demanding countries put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation. While at least two countries, Argentina and Brazil, initially rejected the demands, calling them abusive, many others accepted Pfizer's terms from the start.
Public Citizen has now reviewed and published the secret contracts2,3 between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Commission, Peru, the U.S. and the U.K. These contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented power to Pfizer. In virtually all scenarios, Pfizer's interests come first.

Pfizer Is Calling the Shots​

Public Citizen points out six ways in which nations are allowing Pfizer to call the shots. For example, Albania, Brazil and Colombia have handed over unilateral authority to the company for the delivery schedule and other key decisions. As reported by Public Citizen:4


Pfizer also maintains tight control over vaccine supplies, and dictates who can buy their vaccine, when, and who can give and receive vaccine donations. If there are shortages, Pfizer decides which countries get priority.

Bypassing Pfizer can be costly. For example, if Brazil were to accept vaccine donations from another country without Pfizer's approval, the company can terminate the contract and force Brazil to pay the full prize for all remaining contracted doses. Meanwhile, Pfizer incurs no penalty if its delivery is late, even if it's so late that the shots are no longer needed.
Some countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, also ended up agreeing to Pfizer's demand to put up sovereign assets as collateral for vaccine injury lawsuits, including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings.
In short, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer will be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it, so the company won't lose a dime if its COVID shot injures people — even if those injuries are the result of negligent company practices, fraud or malice!
At the same time, government purchasers must acknowledge that the effectiveness and safety of the shots are completely unknown. This is the ultimate corporate maleficence, using their leverage to force the kill shot down these countries' throats and avoiding any personal responsibility for damages.

Secret Arbitration​

The contracts also dictate how contractual disputes will be settled. As reported by Public Citizen:5





Pfizer Secured Intellectual Property Rights​

Amazingly, the contracts not only secure Pfizer's intellectual property rights, but should Pfizer be found guilty of stealing the intellectual property rights of others, some of the contracts shift the responsibility away from Pfizer onto the government purchasers! What this means is that Pfizer can steal the intellectual property of others without consequence in at least four countries.


Pfizer Given Right to Silence Government​

Perhaps most egregious of all, some of the contracts give Pfizer the right to muzzle government. In Brazil, government officials are prohibited from making "any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of [the] Agreement" without the written consent of the company.
The gag order also includes commenting on the government's relationship with Pfizer in general. Similar nondisclosure provisions are included in the contracts with the European Commission and the U.S. government. The only difference, Public Citizen notes, is that the nondisclosure rules apply to both parties.

Pfizer Can Prevent Use of Other Remedies​

Equally shocking, though, is that countries are forced to follow through on their vaccine orders even if other drugs or treatments emerge that can prevent, treat or cure COVID-19.7 Is it any wonder, then, that governments around the world have suppressed the use of drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?
If these drugs were allowed to be used and could be proven to work, the COVID injections would be completely unnecessary, yet governments are on the hook for hundreds of millions of doses. While COVID-19 vaccines are "free" to receive in the U.S., they're being paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.50 per dose. In Albania, the cost of each dose is $12, and in the EU, $14.70.
In the case of the price disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is said to have given a price break to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer — Master of Disaster Profiteering​

going broke tweet
As noted Public Citizen, Pfizer is being allowed to profit from this self-inflicted global disaster in unprecedented ways. In many instances, a nation's laws will not apply to Pfizer.
These secret contracts grant Pfizer total control over its product and ensures full payment, regardless of whether the shots are needed or usable, while simultaneously eliminating all liability. In short, Pfizer wins, no matter what the outcome of the vaccination campaign might be.
At the same time, Pfizer is also controlling media through its advertising dollars. As you've probably realized by now, media companies in most instances will not report on anything that might jeopardize the profits of its advertisers.
As illustrated in the short video above, it couldn't be more obvious that Pfizer is bankrolling the media, which in turn will refuse to bite the hand that feeds it. You can see the wide spectrum of media programming being sponsored by Pfizer, including "Nightline," "Making a Difference," "CNN Tonight," "Early Start," "Erin Burnett Out Front," "This Week with George Stephanopoulos," "CBS Sports," "Meet the Press," "CBS This Morning" and "60 Minutes."

Pfizer Study Shows Increased Mortality​

(Arminius note, cannot load the vid which should be here.)

The terms of these contracts are all the more disturbing when you consider how dangerous the Pfizer shot is turning out to be. No wonder the company refused to accept any liability.
As shown in the video above, Episode 3 in "The False Narrative Takedown Series"8 by Steve Kirsch, Pfizer's own Phase 3 six-month trial9 showed the shots increased all-cause mortality. More people actually died in the treatment group than in the placebo group.
According to Pfizer's own data, one COVID death per 20,000 fully vaccinated individuals is prevented. That means 10,000 lives are saved if 200 million are fully vaccinated.
But how many lives are lost from the shots? This is the other side of the equation that simply demands to be analyzed before any governmental authority can make a decision as to whether the mass vaccination campaign is of benefit or not.
Here, we find that Pfizer's data10 show the shots are actually killing more than they save. To look at this information yourself, click on "Supplementary Material" on the right-hand side of the paper, then, beside Supplementary Appendix, click on supplements/261159 and scroll down to page 12, Table S4.
In the vaccine group, 15 died; in the placebo group 14 died. Two people died from COVID-19 in the placebo group, while only one died from COVID pneumonia in the vaccine group. That's how you get a net false positive impact — one life is spared from COVID. However, the all-cause mortality was actually higher in the vaccine group (15, compared to 14).
So, while the shots saved one person from dying from COVID, they also killed one extra person. So, the net effect is nil. There's no mortality benefit at all. Other investigations using different data strongly suggest the net effect is profoundly negative, and the shots are doing FAR more harm than good.

We Face Looming Vaccine-Induced Public Health Catastrophe​

For this, Kirsch cites a paper11 by Dr. Bart Classen, published in the August 2021 issue of the journal Trends in Internal Medicine. Classen points out that Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are all using a "dangerously misleading" clinical trial design. The problem is that they're all using a surrogate endpoint for health, namely "severe infections with COVID-19."
Disease specific primary endpoints are no longer used in many fields of medicine, for the fact that it can hide problems. If a person dies from the treatment or is severely injured by it, even if the treatment helped block the progression of the disease they're being treated for, the end result is still a negative one.
For this reason, the appropriate endpoint that should be used is all-cause mortality and morbidity. When Classen reexamined the clinical trial data from all three manufacturers using all-cause severe morbidity as the endpoint, a disturbing picture emerged.
… it is all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general. Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe. ~ Dr. Bart Classen
As explained by Classen in his paper, "US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, 'All Cause Severe Morbidity'":12






To make the above numbers more clear and obvious, here are the prevention stats in percentages:
  • Pfizer 0.00036%
  • Moderna 0.00125%
  • Janssen 0.00030%

CDC Claims COVID Shots Lower All-Cause Mortality​

Despite all of that, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now claims Americans "vaccinated" against COVID-19 have lower all-cause mortality rates.13 As reported by Forbes:14



FDA Approves Jab for Young Children​

techno fog tweet
October 26, 2021, the FDA unanimously voted to grant emergency use approval of the COVID shots for children between the ages of 5 and 11.16 This despite acknowledging they have no idea what the long-term risk to children might be. As noted by one voting member, "We're never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it."17
All we have at present is two Pfizer trials, one in which 5- to 11-year-olds were followed for two months and another with just six weeks of follow-up. Both were too small to detect potential risks such as myocarditis. That won't be studied until AFTER the shot is authorized for children. As reported by The Defender:18







During the meeting, Dr. Cody Meissner noted we don't know whether the shot is safe for this age group, and the risk of COVID is extremely low. If the shot is authorized, mandates will likely follow, which would be "bad."
justin hart tweet
Brownstone Institute is also objecting to the authorization. In an October 20, 2021, article,20 Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., a former assistant professor of evidence-based medicine and research methods, called the plan to vaccinate young children "absolutely reckless" and "dangerous based on lack of safety data and poor research methodology."
Meanwhile, data show not a single child has died from COVID-19 who did not have a serious underlying health condition. Alexander reviews a lot of that data in his article.

Staggering Conflicts of Interest​

When you look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members21 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for children as young as 5, the unanimous “yes” vote becomes less of a mystery. As reported by National File,22 they have staggering conflicts of interest. Members include:
Gregg Sylvester — A former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines​
Arnold S. Monto — A paid Pfizer consultant​
Archana Chatterjee — A recent Pfizer research grant recipient​
Myron Levine — Mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer​
James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer vaccines​
Geeta Swamy — Chair of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program​
Steven Pergam — Proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine​
Several people who are already on the record supporting coronavirus vaccines for children, including Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton​
In addition to that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is currently on Pfizer’s board of directors.

FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Children​

With these shots now being pushed on young children, it's more imperative than ever to understand how data are being massaged and manipulated to support the ongoing lunacy. Of particular concern is evidence that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is burying data on children who were seriously injured in the vaccine trials. As reported by Aaron Siri on Substack:23


Siri tells the story of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who along with her two brothers were enrolled by her parents in Pfizer's clinical trial. That decision has changed the lives of the entire family, possibly forever. Within 24 hours of her second dose, Maddie suffered crippling pain and systemic injuries.
Maddie is now wheelchair-bound and requires a feeding tube. Pfizer's principal investigator initially claimed Maddie's injuries were unrelated to the shot and treated her as a mental patient. Eventually, her injury was listed as "functional abdominal pain" in Pfizer's report to the FDA.







FDA Sued to Access COVID Jab Trial Data​

We're now in a position where it's near-impossible for many to refuse the COVID jab, and if injured, they cannot sue anyone for damages. Adding insult to injury, we don't even have access to all the data governments are supposedly relying on to mandate these hazardous products.
To address this last point, an organization called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is now suing25 the FDA after the agency refused to release the data on which it based its decision to approve Comirnaty.26
The FDA denied the PHMPT request for expedited processing of its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the basis that no "imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual" existed. Per the complaint:27


'Just Say No' to the COVID Shot​


While U.S. authorities are doing their best to hide incriminating data and manipulating the rest to show some sort of benefit, common sense, medical facts and available data all point in the opposite direction. It's crystal clear to me that children do not need the COVID shot, as their risk of serious COVID-19 infection and death is virtually nonexistent.
On the other hand, children are quite likely to be seriously injured by these injections. The reason you're not getting the truth from the media is explained by Dr. Peter McCullough in the video above. In short, it's a planned propaganda campaign — "the promotion of false information by the people in charge."
According to McCullough, anyone under the age of 50 has a less than 1% chance of a bad outcome if they come down with COVID-19. "Why would you take the vaccine?" he asks. "My advice," he says, "is just say no to this [shot], especially young people who are not at risk."
Thanks for copy/pasting it...

What's the "deal" with having their article "expire in 40 hours"???
Marketing ploy?
- Bastards!!!
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
11,781

Goldhedge

Retired
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
63,832
Reaction score
138,034
Location
Rocky Mountains

VAERS COVID Vaccine
Myo/Pericarditis Reports​

Through October 22, 2021
 

EricTheCat

An ant on a hill.
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
2,650
Reaction score
7,267
Location
Southern MN
Tim Pool got the virus. Hit him pretty hard but he's doing better now after getting "The kitchen sink" treatment.

His story is pretty interesting. Right here:

I am glad he didn't go in to the first place he called.
 

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
15,900
Reaction score
91,209
Location
third cove on the right
CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is "Problematic" CDC: Problematic Vaccine? No, Problematic Definition of Vaccine.
Techno Fog
Internal CDC E-Mails

"CDC emails we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act reveal CDC worries with how the performance of the COVID-19 vaccines didn’t match the CDC’s own definition of “vaccine”/“vaccination”. The CDC’s Ministry of Truth went hard at work in the face of legitimate public questions on this issue."

"In one August 2021 e-mail, a CDC employee cited to complaints that “Right-wing covid-19 deniers are using your ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines…”"

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd5ed67da-86c5-4131-9f51-a1eb631d83dd_743x353.png


"Getting no response, there was a follow-up e-mail a week later: “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition.”"

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F234092f0-46fc-40a2-abe5-18b43a4e0a04_757x562.png


"The change of the “vaccination” definition was eventually approved on August 31. The next day, on September 1, they approved the change to the “vaccine” definition from discussing immunity to protection (seen below)."

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa9ab6b97-926f-4d43-a6f9-4ef471b3a1f2_952x572.png


Full article at the link




----------------




Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

BMJ 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2635
(Published 02 November 2021)
Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2635

"Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight.
Paul D Thacker reports"

Excerpt:

Poor laboratory management

"On its website Ventavia calls itself the largest privately owned clinical research company in Texas and lists many awards it has won for its contract work.2 But Jackson has told The BMJ that, during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020, she repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns, and data integrity issues."

"Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management. Exasperated that Ventavia was not dealing with the problems, Jackson documented several matters late one night, taking photos on her mobile phone."

"One photo, provided to The BMJ, showed needles discarded in a plastic biohazard bag instead of a sharps container box. Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants. Ventavia executives later questioned Jackson for taking the photos."
 

Voodoo

Midas Member
Midas Member
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
6,223
Reaction score
10,227
Location
Deep Underground Bunker
Thanks for copy/pasting it...

What's the "deal" with having their article "expire in 40 hours"???
Marketing ploy?
- Bastards!!!

They threatened his family so he took down a ton of useful articles.
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
17,929
Reaction score
41,664
1636020395909.png
 

ABC123

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
10,987
Reaction score
24,675
1636035250400.png

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1456051448790323203

-------------—

https://youtu.be/YvyvMpjd17I ←link to youtube video

During a press conference at the Hall of Justice on Tuesday, November 2, 2021, Sheriff Alex Villanueva discussed the imminent threat that vaccine mandates will have on areas serviced by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Using a power point presentation, Sheriff Villanueva showed how deputies have begun to leave the department. From October 2019 through October 2020, there were 515 retirements. From October 2020 to October 2021, there were 617 retirements, a difference of 102 deputies who have filed for retirement. Many of those retiring have institutional knowledge and are experts in their fields with over 28 years of experience. Sheriff Villanueva shared that 238 sworn personnel have stated their interest in leaving the department.

Workers’ compensation claims are also on the rise and have increased by 21.9% this last year. He stated that from October 2019 to October 2020, there were 1,434 workers’ compensation claims and as of October 2020 to October 2021, there were 1,749, many attributed to the vaccine mandates.

As of today, 51.7% of the department’s personnel are fully vaccinated and 1.7% are semi-vaccinated. He stated the reason for the low vaccination numbers was due to many not having faith in the vaccine or the political ideology behind the vaccine.

Sheriff Villanueva cautioned that there are 4,185 staff members, both sworn and professional, who may be subject to termination because of the vaccine mandate; 3,137 of the 4,185 are sworn deputies.

The five counties that surround Los Angeles County do not have vaccine mandates and at least half of the department’s sworn personnel do not live in the County of Los Angeles. They can easily apply for employment in those counties.

Villanueva says vaccine mandates are an imminent threat to the safety of the communities the department serves. The department is in danger of losing a significant number of deputies and it would be detrimental to the safety of residents of Los Angeles County.
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
17,929
Reaction score
41,664

Groundbreaking Israeli Study Shows How COVID Proteins Attack The Heart And Blood Vessels​

Tyler Durden's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, NOV 04, 2021 - 12:40 PM
Earlier Thursday morning, we shared a report about a strange phenomenon unfolding at hospitals and emergency rooms across the US. Even as COVID cases continue to fall, emergency rooms across the country have become absolutely packed with patients seeking treatment for abdominal pain, blood clots, heart conditions and respiratory problems. All of these symptoms line up with the wide range of official COVID symptoms reported by the CDC. But, as the news reports state, the cause of this sudden wave, which has led to some patients being treated again in hospital hallways, remains officially unclear.
More than 18 months after it first emerged from Wuhan, SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, remains an enigma to scientists, who have been conducting a wide range of studies to try and learn more about how the virus does what it does. One of COVID's most notable features is its ability to cause damage not just to patient's respiratory system, but to the heart and vascular system as well. Oftentimes, this damage leaves patients with long-lasting symptoms that persist well beyond the initial infection.

Even before it became the first nation on the planet to vaccinate nearly its entire population (it has been doling out booster jabs since August), Israel has been a leading source of COVID-related research. And the latest pioneering study produced by researchers from a range of disciplines (from epidemiology to computer science) at Tel Aviv University certainly raises some interesting questions, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post.
The researchers have become the first on earth to identify which 5 of the 29 proteins that form the SARS-CoV-2 virus are responsible for damaging patients' blood vessels'
...[A] team of Tel Aviv University researchers have identified the five proteins of the 29 that form the virus which are responsible for damaging blood vessels.
"We see a very high incidence of vascular disease and blood clotting, for example, stroke and heart attack among COVID patients," says Dr. Ben Maoz, lead author of the study published in the journal eLife.
"We tend to think of COVID as primarily a respiratory disease but the truth is that coronavirus patients are up to three times more likely to have a stroke or heart attack,” he added. “All the evidence shows that the virus severely damages the blood vessels or the endothelial cells that line the blood vessels. However, to this day, the virus has been treated as one entity. We wanted to find out which proteins in the virus are responsible for this type of damage."
The study was carried out using novel methods: researchers came together to insert different sequences of viral RNA into human blood vessels in a lab, and observed the reaction. In this manner, they were able to deduce which proteins caused the most damage to tissue from the vascular system. In particular, they found which proteins are responsible for doing the most damage to the human vascular system.
"When the coronavirus enters the body, it begins to produce 29 proteins, a new virus is formed, then that virus produces 29 new proteins, and so on," Maoz said.
"In this process, our blood vessels turn from opaque tubes into kind of permeable nets or pieces of cloth, and in parallel there is an increase in blood clotting. We thoroughly examined the effect of each of the 29 proteins expressed by the virus, and were successful in identifying the five specific proteins that cause the greatest damage to endothelial cells and hence to vascular stability and function."
To help model and verify its findings, the team used computational models to discern exactly which proteins had the greatest impact on the human tissue.
As the scientists said the hope is that this insight will help humanity develop a better understanding of how the virus causes so much damage to the heart and blood vessels.
"Our research could help find targets for a drug that will be used to stop the virus’s activity, or at least minimize damage to blood vessels."
But, what if it instead raises questions about the vaccines scientists have developed, which rely on viral RNA to "reprogram" the human immune system?
 

engineear

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
5,734
Reaction score
9,166
Location
North of the Wall

Groundbreaking Israeli Study Shows How COVID Proteins Attack The Heart And Blood Vessels​

Tyler Durden's Photo's Photo

BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, NOV 04, 2021 - 12:40 PM
Earlier Thursday morning, we shared a report about a strange phenomenon unfolding at hospitals and emergency rooms across the US. Even as COVID cases continue to fall, emergency rooms across the country have become absolutely packed with patients seeking treatment for abdominal pain, blood clots, heart conditions and respiratory problems. All of these symptoms line up with the wide range of official COVID symptoms reported by the CDC. But, as the news reports state, the cause of this sudden wave, which has led to some patients being treated again in hospital hallways, remains officially unclear.
More than 18 months after it first emerged from Wuhan, SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, remains an enigma to scientists, who have been conducting a wide range of studies to try and learn more about how the virus does what it does. One of COVID's most notable features is its ability to cause damage not just to patient's respiratory system, but to the heart and vascular system as well. Oftentimes, this damage leaves patients with long-lasting symptoms that persist well beyond the initial infection.

Even before it became the first nation on the planet to vaccinate nearly its entire population (it has been doling out booster jabs since August), Israel has been a leading source of COVID-related research. And the latest pioneering study produced by researchers from a range of disciplines (from epidemiology to computer science) at Tel Aviv University certainly raises some interesting questions, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post.
The researchers have become the first on earth to identify which 5 of the 29 proteins that form the SARS-CoV-2 virus are responsible for damaging patients' blood vessels'

The study was carried out using novel methods: researchers came together to insert different sequences of viral RNA into human blood vessels in a lab, and observed the reaction. In this manner, they were able to deduce which proteins caused the most damage to tissue from the vascular system. In particular, they found which proteins are responsible for doing the most damage to the human vascular system.

To help model and verify its findings, the team used computational models to discern exactly which proteins had the greatest impact on the human tissue.
As the scientists said the hope is that this insight will help humanity develop a better understanding of how the virus causes so much damage to the heart and blood vessels.

But, what if it instead raises questions about the vaccines scientists have developed, which rely on viral RNA to "reprogram" the human immune system?
Try to share this with a vaxxed human....run away run away!!
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
15,239

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
15,239
View attachment 230979
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1456051448790323203

-------------—

https://youtu.be/YvyvMpjd17I ←link to youtube video

During a press conference at the Hall of Justice on Tuesday, November 2, 2021, Sheriff Alex Villanueva discussed the imminent threat that vaccine mandates will have on areas serviced by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Using a power point presentation, Sheriff Villanueva showed how deputies have begun to leave the department. From October 2019 through October 2020, there were 515 retirements. From October 2020 to October 2021, there were 617 retirements, a difference of 102 deputies who have filed for retirement. Many of those retiring have institutional knowledge and are experts in their fields with over 28 years of experience. Sheriff Villanueva shared that 238 sworn personnel have stated their interest in leaving the department.

Workers’ compensation claims are also on the rise and have increased by 21.9% this last year. He stated that from October 2019 to October 2020, there were 1,434 workers’ compensation claims and as of October 2020 to October 2021, there were 1,749, many attributed to the vaccine mandates.

As of today, 51.7% of the department’s personnel are fully vaccinated and 1.7% are semi-vaccinated. He stated the reason for the low vaccination numbers was due to many not having faith in the vaccine or the political ideology behind the vaccine.

Sheriff Villanueva cautioned that there are 4,185 staff members, both sworn and professional, who may be subject to termination because of the vaccine mandate; 3,137 of the 4,185 are sworn deputies.

The five counties that surround Los Angeles County do not have vaccine mandates and at least half of the department’s sworn personnel do not live in the County of Los Angeles. They can easily apply for employment in those counties.

Villanueva says vaccine mandates are an imminent threat to the safety of the communities the department serves. The department is in danger of losing a significant number of deputies and it would be detrimental to the safety of residents of Los Angeles County.

Time to go to a doctor and claim "lower back injury" & collect workman's comp, it seems... (Just don't get caught doing strenuous efforts or sports later - like some "claimants" who "post their feats on FaceBook", haha!)

Better yet, fall to the floor after lifting something heavy at work... and STAY DOWN... until the ambulance carts you off... Very hard for the docs to "prove or disprove" lower back injuries, if my memory serves me. Just practice becoming a good actor.

I wonder how much Workers' Comp claims numbers have risen nationwide since the jabs rules started...
 
Last edited:

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,656
Reaction score
27,860
ItalianIH.jpg




excerpt:
The Institute’s new definition of a COVID death means that COVID has killed fewer people in Italy than (whisper it) the average bout of seasonal flu.​
If a similar change were made by other national governments, the official COVID death toll would be cut by a margin of greater than 90 per cent.​
Don’t expect many others to follow suit though, given that governments have invested so much of their authority in hyping the the threat posed by the virus.​
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,656
Reaction score
27,860
SocTyr.jpg



The “greater good” theory is meant to either appeal-to or silence conservatives and libertarians that oppose the vaccines on the grounds of the non-aggression principle. Covid mandates rely on the claim that the unvaccinated are an integral danger to society as a whole, and thus force is justified. Now, I have been asking this question over and over again for the past year to any vax fanatic I run across, and not a single person has come up with a valid counter-argument:​
If the vaccines work, then how are unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people? If the vaccines don’t work, then why take them in the first place and why mandate them?​
What does Chomsky think the average death rate of covid actually is? Is he aware that according to dozens of peer reviewed studies the median Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of covid is only 0.27%? Who exactly are the unvaxxed a threat to? Less than 1% of the population? And if we are actually a threat to these people, then maybe THEY should take the vaccines, if they think the vaccines truly work.​
What about the fact that vaccinated people still transmit the disease to others, according the the CDC narrative?​
 

BigJim#1-8

Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5,763
Reaction score
23,813
New bribes in new york prison. Take the jab, get mickey d's.
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
71,532
Reaction score
150,819
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
15,239

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
17,929
Reaction score
41,664
Getting ahead of the upcoming food shortages with flauci deer flu fear