New Zealand allows euthanasia for Covid but won't allow Ivermectin:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/comments/roo0ej
https://www.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusCirclejerk/comments/roo0ej
I would like to personally delete them all. Just to make sure the "Deletion" worked. You know how deleted people lie.
Face it........ that is the ONLY long term solution.I would like to personally delete they all. Just to make sure the "Deletion" worked. You know how deleted people lie.
I just got it from audible but haven’t started. I’m looking forward to it after listening to the 1.5 hour in depth interview someone posted.There is a lot of ado regarding Kennedy's book on Fauchi that relates to this. I think the book has been banned at certain book sellers. I didn't post this but I came across this at another website that offers no cost downloads.
I got it for Christmas from Mrs Old, only part way through. Most of the people who need to read it probably won't.There is a lot of ado regarding Kennedy's book on Fauchi that relates to this. I think the book has been banned at certain book sellers. I didn't post this but I came across this at another website that offers no cost downloads.
Photo on right taken after network interview was over and that camera was off. Paycheck is based on what Network & NFL wants.
GATES last words are the only TRUTH told in the entire two minutes.A pack of baboons is called a Congress. A group of clowns is called a clown alley
This seems to be a hybrid of sorts
Doctors who 'assume' kill hundreds of thousands of patients every year caused by misdiagnoses. It's what they do! These people are witch doctors who have a hair across their asses. Not a good recipe for public safety
Who is He ?We Knew The TRUTH Would Come Out BUT THIS IS WORSE Than Most Imagined!
4:00 mark ... proofs
15:00 mark ... variant
17:00 ....direct to consumer
https://www.brighteon.com/717e31ec-0334-46b2-a865-fc5fb1ad78c3
Right? I watched the entire thing and found it fascinating...but I was left wondering the same. BTW a book mentioned in the video(Emerging Viruses by Leonard G Horowitz) is available on amazon right now! ...for $121.83.Who is He ?
What is he?
Where is He ?
Who was he giving this address too ?
Emerging Viruses by Leonard G Horowitz
Who is He ?
What is he?
Where is He ?
Who was he giving this address too ?
Dr Michael Mcdowell
That is all I can find...
probably for a reason
.We Knew The TRUTH Would Come Out BUT THIS IS WORSE Than Most Imagined!
How To Make Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) At Home | Home Recipe For Hydroxychloroquine (Quinine Version)
Vallée was reportedly very health conscious, exercised regularly and abstained from alcohol.Emmy Award-Winning Canadian Director Shocks Hollywood After He Suddenly Dies of a Heart Attack at Age 58
December 27, 2021, 8:00pmby Cristina Laila
Watchman1
25m
They died with their masks on.
.
He's only got one lesson to learn:Has Dr. Fauci Learned His Lesson?
Dr. Fauci's Dance With Nature
tippinsights Editorial Board29.Dec.2021
Way back in 2012, Dr. Fauci was a visionary championing risky research. Some call him the Godfather of gain-of-function research. He penned an article in mBio, the American Society for Microbiology journal, titled "Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward."
Here's Dr. Fauci: The issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away. Putting aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
He goes on to write: Scientists working in this field might say - as indeed I have said - that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky. However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally. We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place. Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.
But, Dr. Fauci's recent public interactions are neither thoughtful nor respectful. He is on the defensive and gets flustered at the mere mention of 'gain-of-function,' for much has happened in the intervening years.
In 2011, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity put off publishing two studies involving modified H5N1 for fear that the know-how would fall into the wrong hands. A couple of years later, in 2014, it was revealed that personnel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might have been unintentionally exposed to anthrax. Another incident was reported in which vials of smallpox virus had been left unattended in an NIH storeroom. The news that the CDC had accidentally sent out samples of influenza virus contaminated with H5N1 raised more alarm.
The accidents mentioned above could have had terrible consequences. Fearing that lab-created enhanced viruses could fall into the hands of rogue individuals or groups, a group of 200 scientists signed the Cambridge Working Group declaration calling for an end to experiments creating potential pandemic pathogens. The gravity of the situation prompted the U.S. administration to impose a moratorium on gain-of-function research.
Once the ban on such research was announced in October 2014, the NIH declared that it "will be effective until a robust and broad deliberative process is completed that results in the adoption of a new U.S. Government gain-of-function research policy."
The federal ban on gain-of-function research stayed in effect until December 2017. A new framework was put in place for assessing funding decisions, to be done on a case-by-case basis by a multidisciplinary review board at HHS. The board is expected to explore whether "less risky approaches to tackle the same question" are available in each instance.
When the United States lifted its ban, Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, told Nature magazine that gain-of-function studies "have done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics — yet they risked creating an accidental pandemic."
The high risks and potential threat of a pandemic were just that—a hypothetical scenario or a mere possibility—until 2020. Today, the world is reeling from an unprecedented pandemic that could have started with an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, shows that it has a bat virus backbone with a Pangolin virus spiked protein. The furin cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 gives the virus the ability to cross species and tissue barriers but was previously unseen in other SARS‐like CoVs. Eleven labs worldwide, including WIV, have engineered a furin site to make a virus more infectious.
Some intelligence professionals believe the Chinese military used the WIV to further its interests. Adding to the suspicion, the French who helped set up the WIV lab were excluded from the lab by the end of 2014. The WIV's virus database was erased shortly before the pandemic was declared.
It has now come to light that the U.S. funded some research at WIV through Dr. Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance. Dr. Fauci defended the move, saying, "This is a sub-award from a larger grant that received one of the highest scores from American peer reviewers for research that needed to be done. So, you say, why do it in China? You do it in China through a very well-known, highly qualified laboratory." This "well-known, highly qualified laboratory," WIV, has been actively thwarting the international community's efforts to get to the origins of the pandemic.
Further, Dr. Fauci said, "So you don't want to go to Hoboken, NJ or Fairfax, VA to be studying the bat-human interface that might lead to an outbreak. So you go to China." And the outbreak in China has now infected every corner of the world.
The key question here is where Dr. Fauci stands on gain-of-function research now. As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President of the United States, his opinion will strongly influence national policy.
It is abundantly evident that sending dangerous experiments across the oceans is not enough protection for Americans. A decade ago, Dr. Fauci wrote: "Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully."
Here are a few questions for Dr. Fauci.
- In light of recent events, do you still believe that gain-of-function studies outweigh the risks?
- What were the deliberations when the ban was lifted in 2017? Who were the scientists involved in the decision-making? Did the Trump White House authorize the reversal? And if yes, who authorized it?
- Is such research allowed or banned in the U.S. now?
- Why did you not disclose the possibility of the lab leak theory to the American public or the Trump White House even though you knew it was a possibility?
![]()