• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

Irons

Outlaw Prospector
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
32,512
Reaction score
66,883
"And for my next trick I will transmit a disease I don't have to somebody who's been immunized against it."

~ Joe Dan Gorman


.
 

Irons

Outlaw Prospector
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
32,512
Reaction score
66,883

British Government Sending Door-to-Door Compliance Teams to Homes of Unvaccinated or Unboosted​


December 26, 2021 | Sundance | 250 Comments

They know if you’ve been sleeping…
They know if you’re awake…
They know if you’ve been vaxxed or not,

So get vaxxed or meet the state.

Yes, the British people are about to discover how non-private their medical history actually is. U.K. authorities discussing ways to send vaccination and booster compliance squads to the homes of the unvaccinated.

biden-door-to-door-1.jpg


(UK Daily Mail) – Door-to-door teams armed with Covid jabs will be sent to the homes of unvaccinated Britons in plans being considered by Ministers to reach the estimated five million people yet to be inoculated.


Discussions between the Department of Health, NHS England and No 10 over the past week have looked at a nationwide drive to send vaccine teams to areas with low uptake rates as a crucial way to avoid lockdown and other restrictions.

It is also seen as a way to get jabs to rural areas or households where people cannot easily get to a vaccination centre.
(read more)


boris-johnson-phone-vaccination-compliance.jpg

Posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Coronavirus, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, media bias, Medical Tyranny, propaganda, Uncategorized, United Kingdom (UK) and Great Britain, Vaccine Mandate
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295

Vlad The Impaler

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
3,071
Reaction score
2,757
Like a junkie hooked on a drug you will beg for your booster shots.

 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269


non veni pacem
The Splendor of Truth

Remember that time Merck cancelled its vaccine program and dumped all its research budget into a pill to cure covid? Now approved in the U.S.​

Posted onDECEMBER 23, 2021
U.S. approves Merck covid pill: https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2021/12/23/u-s-approves-2nd-covid-pill-from-merck/
Remember back when they quit the vaxx? Why would they quit the vaxx, with billions at stake? What did they know, and when did they know it? I mean, Merck had already donated distributed four billion doses of IVM, so they certainly knew how safe it was, but off-patent, so no profits. But it seems they also had knowledge of VEI and ADE all the way back in January, otherwise, why pour millions into research against a disease that was about to be eradicated by the just-released Pfizer and Moderna jabs? Why would you bet on mountains of severe covid cases well into the future, if the “vaccines” were safe and effective?

Hmmm… Why would Merck be canceling its own vaccine and pouring all their money into experimental drugs to treat future severe corona patients?​

Originally posted on JANUARY 30, 2021
Merck will now focus instead on two therapeutic drugs, termed MK-7110 and MK-4482. MK-7110 allegedly has a “greater than 50 percent reduction in the risk of death or respiratory failure in patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19,” although full results are not yet published. The company is to receive around $356 million from the U.S. government as part of Operation Warp Speed in order to manufacture 60,000-100,000 doses of the two drugs until June 30, 2021. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/m...tter-immunity-found-through-natural-infection
I mean, if the other vaccines work (Pfizer/Moderna), why would anyone be anticipating a surge in severe patient outcomes this summer? Doesn’t that seem counterintuitive? Why would a company place all their focus on treatment drugs for a disease that is about to be wiped out? What did Merck learn during their own vaccine trials that led them to make the switch, storming toward the betting window like Doyle Lonnegan when he found out Lucky Dan was going to run second…
This. Is. Why. I stumbled across the following last summer, when President Trump was promising a vaccine before the election. If you want to understand how and why all previous attempts at a coronavirus vaccine have failed, and failed spectacularly, read this. The vaccines have a history in causing a supercharged adverse reaction… not when injected, but down the road when the subject encounters the wild virus. It’s not just that the vaccines don’t work, it’s that they cause harm. One of the key terms you will want to research is antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

Would you be surprised to learn that coronavirus vaccines have a tendency to kill the patient?​

Originally posted on JULY 24, 2020
Imagine my shock to learn that there is a significant risk of worsened illness or higher mortality for vaccines for several past strains of coronavirus, including RSV, SARS, and feline coronavirus. The vaccines end up enhancing the infection by increasing the body’s uptake of the pathogen. It’s almost as if they picked a coronavirus on purpose. The following article is three nine months old, so bear that in mind, but all of the facts remain relevant. Full annotation at the source link.

SOURCE HERE
As they race to devise a vaccine, researchers are trying to ensure that their candidates don’t spur a counterproductive, even dangerous, immune system reaction known as immune enhancement.
The teams of researchers scrambling to develop a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine clearly face some big challenges, both scientific and logistical. One of the most pressing: understanding how the immune system interacts not only with the pathogen but with the vaccine itself—crucial insights when attempting to develop a safe and effective vaccine.
Researchers need to understand in particular whether the vaccine causes the same types of immune system malfunctions that have been observed in past vaccine development. Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon: Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated (1). The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection. “That is something we want to avoid,” says Kanta Subbarao, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza in Melbourne, Australia.
This immune backfiring, or so-called immune enhancement, may manifest in different ways such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection; or cell-based enhancement, a category that includes allergic inflammation caused by Th2 immunopathology. In some cases, the enhancement processes might overlap. Scientific debate is underway as to which, if any, of these phenomena—for which exact mechanisms remain unclear—could be at play with the novel coronavirus and just how they might affect the success of vaccine candidates.
Some researchers argue that although ADE has received the most attention to date, it is less likely than the other immune enhancement pathways to cause a dysregulated response to COVID-19, given what is known about the epidemiology of the virus and its behavior in the human body. “There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,” says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses—named for the crown-shaped spike they use to enter human cells—at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology (2). Baric expresses his concern about what that might mean for use of a COVID-19 vaccine in elderly people. “Of course, the elderly are our most vulnerable population,” he adds.
Experts generally agree that animal experiments and human clinical trials of candidate vaccines for COVID-19, which is caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), should include a careful assessment of possible immune complications before releasing the vaccine to the public. If any of the mechanisms under investigation are indeed involved, they say, the resulting risks are real. “You really have to test a vaccine carefully,” says Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard Chan School of Public Health in Boston, MA, “and not just roll it out because people are clamoring for it with an epidemic underway.”
Upwards of 80% of patients who contract COVID-19 develop only mild flu-like symptoms. “The immune system fights off the virus and people might hardly notice,” says Darrell Ricke, a researcher with the MIT Lincoln Laboratory’s Bioengineering Systems and Technologies Group in Lexington, MA, who posted a preprint in March on the possible COVID-19 vaccine risks (3). “But there seems to be a tipping point: Some individuals appear equally healthy yet can progress to a more severe disease.”
Ricke points to ADE as a potential explanation for this variability. The phenomenon has been reported in some tissue culture and animal studies of HIV, influenza, and SARS. But it is best known for its influence on the immune response to the dengue virus. If a person is infected with one of dengue’s four serotypes, their immune system should confer lifelong protection against that serotype. But as researchers have discovered, if that person is later infected by a different dengue serotype, then they can develop a severe and potentially deadly illness. In fact, according to one study in the 1980s, more severe responses were found to be 15 to 80 times more likely in secondary dengue infections than in primary infections (4). Instead of the antibodies neutralizing encountered dengue viral proteins, they enhance uptake of the virus. The back end of the antibody binds to macrophages, a type of white blood cell, and helps the virus enter those cells and accelerate viral replication.

ADE has posed a similar challenge in the creation of vaccines for infections including dengue and a cat coronavirus, feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). In one study, cats vaccinated against FIPV got sicker than cats left unvaccinated (5). Again, the virus-specific antibody increased the virus uptake by macrophages.


Barney Graham, deputy director of the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in Bethesda, MD, which is collaborating with the Cambridge, MA-based biotech Moderna on a COVID-19 vaccine candidate, also questioned the role of ADE… Graham emphasizes alternative ways in which a vaccine could potentially induce more serious COVID-19 infections: Th2 immunopathology, in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.
Both processes were at play as an unfortunate situation unfolded in the 1960s, according to Graham. Researchers at the time were pursuing a vaccine against RSV, the leading cause of severe respiratory illness in infants. In trials of one vaccine candidate, several children who received the vaccine developed a serious illness when infected with the natural virus (7). Two toddlers died. In this case, researchers noticed severe damage and the unexpected presence of lots of neutrophils and eosinophils, both immune cells, in the children’s lung tissue. A similar inflammatory response was seen in animal models of RSV, in which cytokines, a type of immune cell, had invaded and damaged tissue.

“That really killed RSV vaccines for a generation,” says Peter Hotez, a vaccine researcher and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, TX. After more than 50 years of further study, a candidate RSV vaccine is finally back in clinical trials.

When SARS, also a coronavirus, appeared in China and spread globally nearly two decades ago, Hotez was among researchers who began investigating a potential vaccine. In early tests of his candidate, he witnessed how immune cells of vaccinated animals attacked lung tissue, in much the same way that the RSV vaccine had resulted in immune cells attacking kids’ lungs.

Moderna’s mRNA vaccine candidate has progressed at unprecedented speed, thanks in large part to China’s January release of the genetic sequence of the virus. A phase 1 clinical trial began on March 16 in Seattle, WA. “We need to get some answers by next winter so we can at least be more prepared for the winter of 2021–2022,” adds Graham.
But immune enhancement concerns linger. Stanley Perlman, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, agrees that a good T cell response should sidestep enhancement concerns. He is also part of a special committee convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) to address immune enhancement, which they refer to as vaccine enhancement. The committee now aims to define what exactly this enhancement means, what the relevant issues are for a COVID-19 vaccine, and what to do with that information, notes Perlman. A subgroup of the committee is expected to produce a summary report within a few months.

Vaccine experts have underscored the need to avoid mistakes from the past, such as the halting of SARS vaccine development. More coronaviruses are likely waiting in wild bats, primates, and rodents, ready to make the jump to humans. “Ecological disruption really increases the odds that we might encounter a pathogen that we’ve never seen before but grows in us just fine,” says Rasmussen.
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269

How To Make Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) At Home | Home Recipe For Hydroxychloroquine (Quinine Version)​


 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
10,079
Reaction score
15,827

How To Make Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) At Home | Home Recipe For Hydroxychloroquine (Quinine Version)​



I call BS....

just PERHAPS a product SIMILAR to QUININE, but DEFINITELY NOT the formula of HCQ "Hydroxy" (oxygen peroxide) "Chloro" (chlorine) "Quine" (quinine)... imho...

I'd wager that TONIC WATER contains more quinine than this "home brew"...
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295
Busted! The Great Fauci/NIH Anti-Science Conspiracy! (32 min 50 sec):


Published on Dec 20, 2021 by RonPaulLibertyReport​
 

edsl48

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Survivor
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
4,190
Reaction score
8,995

Has Dr. Fauci Learned His Lesson?​

Dr. Fauci's Dance With Nature
tippinsights Editorial Board29.Dec.2021
Way back in 2012, Dr. Fauci was a visionary championing risky research. Some call him the Godfather of gain-of-function research. He penned an article in mBio, the American Society for Microbiology journal, titled "Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward."
Here's Dr. Fauci: The issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away. Putting aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
He goes on to write: Scientists working in this field might say - as indeed I have said - that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky. However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally. We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place. Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.
But, Dr. Fauci's recent public interactions are neither thoughtful nor respectful. He is on the defensive and gets flustered at the mere mention of 'gain-of-function,' for much has happened in the intervening years.
In 2011, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity put off publishing two studies involving modified H5N1 for fear that the know-how would fall into the wrong hands. A couple of years later, in 2014, it was revealed that personnel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might have been unintentionally exposed to anthrax. Another incident was reported in which vials of smallpox virus had been left unattended in an NIH storeroom. The news that the CDC had accidentally sent out samples of influenza virus contaminated with H5N1 raised more alarm.
The accidents mentioned above could have had terrible consequences. Fearing that lab-created enhanced viruses could fall into the hands of rogue individuals or groups, a group of 200 scientists signed the Cambridge Working Group declaration calling for an end to experiments creating potential pandemic pathogens. The gravity of the situation prompted the U.S. administration to impose a moratorium on gain-of-function research.
Once the ban on such research was announced in October 2014, the NIH declared that it "will be effective until a robust and broad deliberative process is completed that results in the adoption of a new U.S. Government gain-of-function research policy."
The federal ban on gain-of-function research stayed in effect until December 2017. A new framework was put in place for assessing funding decisions, to be done on a case-by-case basis by a multidisciplinary review board at HHS. The board is expected to explore whether "less risky approaches to tackle the same question" are available in each instance.
When the United States lifted its ban, Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, told Nature magazine that gain-of-function studies "have done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics — yet they risked creating an accidental pandemic."
The high risks and potential threat of a pandemic were just that—a hypothetical scenario or a mere possibility—until 2020. Today, the world is reeling from an unprecedented pandemic that could have started with an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, shows that it has a bat virus backbone with a Pangolin virus spiked protein. The furin cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 gives the virus the ability to cross species and tissue barriers but was previously unseen in other SARS‐like CoVs. Eleven labs worldwide, including WIV, have engineered a furin site to make a virus more infectious.
Some intelligence professionals believe the Chinese military used the WIV to further its interests. Adding to the suspicion, the French who helped set up the WIV lab were excluded from the lab by the end of 2014. The WIV's virus database was erased shortly before the pandemic was declared.
It has now come to light that the U.S. funded some research at WIV through Dr. Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance. Dr. Fauci defended the move, saying, "This is a sub-award from a larger grant that received one of the highest scores from American peer reviewers for research that needed to be done. So, you say, why do it in China? You do it in China through a very well-known, highly qualified laboratory." This "well-known, highly qualified laboratory," WIV, has been actively thwarting the international community's efforts to get to the origins of the pandemic.
Further, Dr. Fauci said, "So you don't want to go to Hoboken, NJ or Fairfax, VA to be studying the bat-human interface that might lead to an outbreak. So you go to China." And the outbreak in China has now infected every corner of the world.
The key question here is where Dr. Fauci stands on gain-of-function research now. As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President of the United States, his opinion will strongly influence national policy.
It is abundantly evident that sending dangerous experiments across the oceans is not enough protection for Americans. A decade ago, Dr. Fauci wrote: "Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully."
Here are a few questions for Dr. Fauci.
  • In light of recent events, do you still believe that gain-of-function studies outweigh the risks?
  • What were the deliberations when the ban was lifted in 2017? Who were the scientists involved in the decision-making? Did the Trump White House authorize the reversal? And if yes, who authorized it?
  • Is such research allowed or banned in the U.S. now?
  • Why did you not disclose the possibility of the lab leak theory to the American public or the Trump White House even though you knew it was a possibility?
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110

Has Dr. Fauci Learned His Lesson?​

Dr. Fauci's Dance With Nature
tippinsights Editorial Board29.Dec.2021
Way back in 2012, Dr. Fauci was a visionary championing risky research. Some call him the Godfather of gain-of-function research. He penned an article in mBio, the American Society for Microbiology journal, titled "Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward."
Here's Dr. Fauci: The issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away. Putting aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
He goes on to write: Scientists working in this field might say - as indeed I have said - that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky. However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally. We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place. Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.
But, Dr. Fauci's recent public interactions are neither thoughtful nor respectful. He is on the defensive and gets flustered at the mere mention of 'gain-of-function,' for much has happened in the intervening years.
In 2011, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity put off publishing two studies involving modified H5N1 for fear that the know-how would fall into the wrong hands. A couple of years later, in 2014, it was revealed that personnel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might have been unintentionally exposed to anthrax. Another incident was reported in which vials of smallpox virus had been left unattended in an NIH storeroom. The news that the CDC had accidentally sent out samples of influenza virus contaminated with H5N1 raised more alarm.
The accidents mentioned above could have had terrible consequences. Fearing that lab-created enhanced viruses could fall into the hands of rogue individuals or groups, a group of 200 scientists signed the Cambridge Working Group declaration calling for an end to experiments creating potential pandemic pathogens. The gravity of the situation prompted the U.S. administration to impose a moratorium on gain-of-function research.
Once the ban on such research was announced in October 2014, the NIH declared that it "will be effective until a robust and broad deliberative process is completed that results in the adoption of a new U.S. Government gain-of-function research policy."
The federal ban on gain-of-function research stayed in effect until December 2017. A new framework was put in place for assessing funding decisions, to be done on a case-by-case basis by a multidisciplinary review board at HHS. The board is expected to explore whether "less risky approaches to tackle the same question" are available in each instance.
When the United States lifted its ban, Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, told Nature magazine that gain-of-function studies "have done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics — yet they risked creating an accidental pandemic."
The high risks and potential threat of a pandemic were just that—a hypothetical scenario or a mere possibility—until 2020. Today, the world is reeling from an unprecedented pandemic that could have started with an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, shows that it has a bat virus backbone with a Pangolin virus spiked protein. The furin cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 gives the virus the ability to cross species and tissue barriers but was previously unseen in other SARS‐like CoVs. Eleven labs worldwide, including WIV, have engineered a furin site to make a virus more infectious.
Some intelligence professionals believe the Chinese military used the WIV to further its interests. Adding to the suspicion, the French who helped set up the WIV lab were excluded from the lab by the end of 2014. The WIV's virus database was erased shortly before the pandemic was declared.
It has now come to light that the U.S. funded some research at WIV through Dr. Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance. Dr. Fauci defended the move, saying, "This is a sub-award from a larger grant that received one of the highest scores from American peer reviewers for research that needed to be done. So, you say, why do it in China? You do it in China through a very well-known, highly qualified laboratory." This "well-known, highly qualified laboratory," WIV, has been actively thwarting the international community's efforts to get to the origins of the pandemic.
Further, Dr. Fauci said, "So you don't want to go to Hoboken, NJ or Fairfax, VA to be studying the bat-human interface that might lead to an outbreak. So you go to China." And the outbreak in China has now infected every corner of the world.
The key question here is where Dr. Fauci stands on gain-of-function research now. As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President of the United States, his opinion will strongly influence national policy.
It is abundantly evident that sending dangerous experiments across the oceans is not enough protection for Americans. A decade ago, Dr. Fauci wrote: "Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully."
Here are a few questions for Dr. Fauci.
  • In light of recent events, do you still believe that gain-of-function studies outweigh the risks?
  • What were the deliberations when the ban was lifted in 2017? Who were the scientists involved in the decision-making? Did the Trump White House authorize the reversal? And if yes, who authorized it?
  • Is such research allowed or banned in the U.S. now?
  • Why did you not disclose the possibility of the lab leak theory to the American public or the Trump White House even though you knew it was a possibility?
He's only got one lesson to learn:

swinging noose.gif
 

Irons

Outlaw Prospector
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
32,512
Reaction score
66,883

Why Has New York City COVID Hospitalizations Spiked Amid 90 Percent Vaccinated Population?​

By Alicia Powe
Published December 27, 2021 at 6:00pm
863 Comments

Despite an overwhelming majority of New York residents being fully vaccinated, hospitals in the state are reportedly filled with Covid infected patients and an increasing number of those admitted with the virus are children.

During a remote press briefing from City Hall on Monday, outgoing New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio claimed there were 17,343 new Covid-positive test results in the city, of which 296 were hospitalized.
Statewide, hospitalizations surged by 11 percent in just one day, from 4,891 on Christmas to 5,526 on Sunday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said Monday.


.https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/new-york-covid-hospitalizations-spiked-amid-90-percent-vaccinated-population/
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
Fights COVID Like Hydroxychloroquine, yet Easier to Find

Quercetin is the key to opening the cells up to access of zinc to stop virus replication

It's only part of the overall protocol defined here in a number of threads. I take it every day along with D3, zinc and magnesium
 

lukdiver

Silver Miner
Seeker
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
678
Reaction score
1,873
Dr. Zelenko early-on with this shit-show was using HCQ. Had to switch to quercetin after Gov.(kill'em) Cuamo outlawed it. He's treated thousands. Ivermectin/HCQ are the 'gun' and quercetin too, zinc is the 'bullet' from Dr. Zelenko. He also calls for EGCG, epigallocatechin-gallate, as a zinc ionophore.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,324
Reaction score
12,142
BigPharma companies are – like all business entities – about increasing profits. As German Member of EU Parliament Christine Anderson recently said,

“pharmaceutical companies are about as interested in public health as the arms industry is in world peace.”

Our good health is bad for their bottom line.

 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295
VAX Nation - New Intellectual Froglegs (35 min 17 sec)

JoeDanGorman Published December 26, 2021​
 

Irons

Outlaw Prospector
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
32,512
Reaction score
66,883

CDC Director Rochelle Wolensky Attempts to Retain Collapsing COVID Narrative Surrounding Changes to Guidance​


December 29, 2021 | Sundance | 320 Comments

When CDC Director Rochelle Wolensky talks, she is speaking to a diminishing audience of branch covidians. As the official guidance from the U.S. medical community (NIH, FDA, CDC) shifts drastically, more people are awake to the political motives behind the rules. This reality is now becoming a serious issue for them.

Earlier today, CDC Director Wolensky spoke to several stenographers about the changes. On ABC she stated there was no recommendation to “test out” of quarantine after five days, because the CDC is now admitting the PCR tests are useless. As she stated, “PCR tests can stay positive for up to 12 weeks” after the infection. This is an issue now, because the politics of the quarantine has changed.

WATCH:
.
In another interview the CNN stenographer, now sensing the dam collapsing, asked directly if this shift in quarantine guidance was due to the “business” or economic impacts of COVID as it relates to the ever-shifting science.

What we are watching, in real time, is a considerable shift amid those who are attempting to retain the false premise behind the COVID narrative. People are not jumping into the booster narrative, because the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated is now nullified by the statements and guidance of the officials themselves.

It is going to get more difficult for the regime to keep pushing COVID-19 mandates, while they have to keep justifying their contradictory positions. The contradictions themselves do not make sense when contrast against the science, especially when the scientific outcomes undermine the original premise of the mandates, rules and guidance.

This is why it has become even more important, in this destabilized public opinion phase, for opposing scientific views to be suppressed.
The institutional government healthcare system is trying to retain credibility. However, the dam is breaking, and they have run out of fingers and toes to plug the gaps. Those in the executive suites have shifted their efforts to securing scuba gear, as indicated by Biden’s “there is no federal government solution”….

Continuing with the dam analogy, further credibility collapses will likely become exponential if the praetorian guard media start asking the obvious questions about where all this water is coming from, and we move into the phase of rapid sunlight.
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295
WSt-6499.jpg



Aaron Rodgers bombshell: NFL secretly administering derided COVID drugs

By Art Moore, Published December 29, 2021 at 5:56pm

excerpt:
Along with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. The Packers star told McAfee the treatment was recommended by podcaster and friend Joe Rogan, who recovered quickly from his own bout with COVID-19.
"I'm not some uneducated person who's throwing stuff out there," Rodgers said. "If you want to rip on me because I took horse dewormer, and whatever else you want to talk about, that's fine. But I also got better in 48 hours. And I had symptoms."
The reference was to ivermectin, which establishment media, in lock step, derided as "horse dewormer," ignoring the fact that it has been administered more than 4 billion times and has antiviral properties shown to be effective in treatment of COVID in dozens of studies.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,324
Reaction score
12,142

New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading: but everybody’s doing it, so who cares, right?


by Jon Rappoport
December 30, 2021

Recently, I’ve been writing fiction, satire, parody, to expose the insanity of the pandemic scam. This article is not that. This article is fact.

Buckle up.

Since the beginning of the so-called pandemic, I’ve been attacking the value of the PCR diagnostic test from many angles. The primary angle, as my readers know, is: SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, never proved to exist.

However, I’ve also ventured into the bubble world where a few billion people blindly accept the existence of the virus—and I’ve shown that even within that world, the internal contradictions and lies abound.

One again, now, I’m entering that bubble world, since the powers-that-be are widely promoting the use of an at-home test for the “virus.”

This test is self-administered. No doctor, nurse, or technician is present. What could possibly go wrong, as millions of people perform the test on themselves?

Well, let’s lead off with DANGER.

The reference is an undated FDA document titled, “BinaxNOWTM COVID-19 Antigen Self TEST.” The Binax test kit is manufactured by Abbott.

Here is the key quote: “The Reagent Solution [included in the test kit] contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice…”

Then the FDA document lists that harmful chemical: sodium azide.

Just how harmful is it?

For an answer, let’s look at a CDC document titled, “Facts About Sodium Azide.” We find this statement:
“Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid.”

Then there is this: “Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die. Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen.”

Yes, as with all poisons, the degree of damage depends on the dosage, but you decide whether “potentially deadly,” as the CDC describes sodium azide, signifies a significant risk.

If you read the FDA document I referenced above, you’ll see that the reagent containing sodium azide is involved in the self-administered COVID test, and the whole test procedure is complex enough to allow fumbles and mistakes—such as a spill of the “deadly chemical.”

Don’t believe me? Try this FDA quote on for size: “To perform the test, an anterior nasal swab specimen is collected by the patient, then 6 drops of extraction reagent from a dropper bottle are added to the top hole of the swab well. The patient sample is inserted into the test card through the bottom hole of the swab well, and firmly pushed upwards until the swab tip is visible through the top hole. The swab is rotated 3 times clockwise and the card is closed, bringing the extracted sample into contact with the test strip. Test results are interpreted visually at 15 minutes based on the presence or absence of visually detectable pink/purple colored lines.”

See what I mean? Good luck.

Now let’s move on to the second problem with this at-home self-performed COVID test: it’s grossly misleading. The results are ambiguous.

The FDA document I’ve been quoting contains this gem: “The BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test does not differentiate between SARS-CoV and SARS…CoV-2.”

BOOM. In other words, a positive test, indicating infection, could mean nothing more than infection with the 2003 “SARS virus”—and that “epidemic” was a dud. But wait, there’s more:
“Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

Double trouble. The person who tests positive could simply be housing bacteria in his body, AND whatever germ the test is detecting may not even be causing disease.

Other than that, the at-home test is perfect.

This Abbott BinaxNow at-home COVID test is the market leader. About 75% of all retail test-kit sales in the US come from Abbott.
Back in the early spring of 2020, I told you the test was the key to faking the pandemic. Now the government wants the population to perform the test-fakery on themselves. With, of course, the added danger of exposing themselves to a highly destructive chemical in the process.

But don’t worry, be happy. On many days of every week, little Tony Fauci will appear on television and inform you that testing is necessary, and he’ll omit grisly details. Trust him.

And then march forward, secure in the knowledge that lies and omissions keep us safe.
 

Densus

Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
1,966
Reaction score
5,151
View attachment 238958


Aaron Rodgers bombshell: NFL secretly administering derided COVID drugs

By Art Moore, Published December 29, 2021 at 5:56pm

excerpt:
Along with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. The Packers star told McAfee the treatment was recommended by podcaster and friend Joe Rogan, who recovered quickly from his own bout with COVID-19.
"I'm not some uneducated person who's throwing stuff out there," Rodgers said. "If you want to rip on me because I took horse dewormer, and whatever else you want to talk about, that's fine. But I also got better in 48 hours. And I had symptoms."
The reference was to ivermectin, which establishment media, in lock step, derided as "horse dewormer," ignoring the fact that it has been administered more than 4 billion times and has antiviral properties shown to be effective in treatment of COVID in dozens of studies.
I may just may watch the Packers play if their on again this season.

I was a fan of Rodgers years ago, then he said something that I can't recall, but it caused me to not like him. Perhaps he has "redeemed" himself.
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,324
Reaction score
12,142
toxicology.jpg
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295
Dr. Peter McCullough: The Suppression of Ivermectin & Other COVID Treatments | PART 1 | TEASER (58 seconds):


Published on Dec 30, 2021 by American Thought Leaders - The Epoch Times​

Full version here:

I just finished watching the full one hour twelve minute interview and it infuriated me. Watch this video and it will infuriate you too.

What the good doctor says about the NIH will also infuriate you. Abolish the NIH if this is how they are going to operate.

Jan Jekielek did a great job interviewing Dr. Peter McCullough. This interview is not rushed and he doesn't interrupt the good doctor. I heard some things here that I hadn't heard before. Definitely worth watching. I can't wait for Part 2.

Kudos to The Epoch Times and to Jan Jekielek for bringing the world this interview.

You certainly won't see this on ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, nor the cable news channels that once served the people.
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
26,702
Location
North Carolina
I just finished watching the full one hour twelve minute interview and it infuriated me. Watch this video and it will infuriate you too.

What the good doctor says about the NIH will also infuriate you. Abolish the NIH if this is how they are going to operate.

Jan Jekielek did a great job interviewing Dr. Peter McCullough. This interview is not rushed and he doesn't interrupt the good doctor. I heard some things here that I hadn't heard before. Definitely worth watching. I can't wait for Part 2.

Kudos to The Epoch Times and to Jan Jekielek for bringing the world this interview.

You certainly won't see this on ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, nor the cable news channels that once served the people.

It want my information to be able to watch it
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
12,857
Reaction score
28,295
It want my information to be able to watch it
Yes, an account is needed to watch it. If you are not already a subscriber to The Epoch Times, you can get a FREE account.
I have a paid subscription and I believe it is well worth the money. But a free account is a bargain. You won't see this quality of journalism on mainstream TV.

The free account requires an email address. If you don't want to use your regular email address, you can get a dummy Yahoo email address to use just for The Epoch Times.


1640918932525.png

You can thank YouTube for this. The Epoch Times used to post their full videos on YouTube but because YouTube no longer supports free speech, The Epoch Times began putting their full videos on their own website.
 
Last edited:

Irons

Outlaw Prospector
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
32,512
Reaction score
66,883

Mengele​

Fauci Takes Professional Gaslighting to New Levels, Now Admitting Children Hospitalized COVID Cases is Wrong

December 30, 2021 | Sundance | 118 Comments

This admission is exactly what people have been arguing for two years. This exact point, and the “with COVID -vs- from COVID” argument within the false narrative, is what justified Big Tech to ban COVID critics from their speech platforms.

I’m not going to comment further; at a certain point these reversals just get silly. WATCH:


.

Suddenly, as the magic politics of COVID infection rates turns into a liability, the accuracy of hospitalized COVID tests is something to clarify.

These officials are just throwing magic beans into the audience at this point. In the past ten days, the CDC, NIH and FDA have jumped so far over the justification shark, the light from where justification shark jumping starts could not catch them for years.



CDC-cases-December-29th-1024x590.jpg
Anthony-Fauci-Rachel-Maddow-1024x584.jpg
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269
1640956291043.png
 

Casey Jones

Train left the station...
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
8,246
Reaction score
13,417
Location
Down the road from the Kaczynski ranch

Mengele​

Fauci Takes Professional Gaslighting to New Levels, Now Admitting Children Hospitalized COVID Cases is Wrong

December 30, 2021 | Sundance | 118 Comments

This admission is exactly what people have been arguing for two years. This exact point, and the “with COVID -vs- from COVID” argument within the false narrative, is what justified Big Tech to ban COVID critics from their speech platforms.

I’m not going to comment further; at a certain point these reversals just get silly. WATCH:


.

Suddenly, as the magic politics of COVID infection rates turns into a liability, the accuracy of hospitalized COVID tests is something to clarify.

These officials are just throwing magic beans into the audience at this point. In the past ten days, the CDC, NIH and FDA have jumped so far over the justification shark, the light from where justification shark jumping starts could not catch them for years.



CDC-cases-December-29th-1024x590.jpg
Anthony-Fauci-Rachel-Maddow-1024x584.jpg
That's a tell for politicized "science" and not true science based on inflexible standards and markers.
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
I may just may watch the Packers play if their on again this season.

I was a fan of Rodgers years ago, then he said something that I can't recall, but it caused me to not like him. Perhaps he has "redeemed" himself.
I don't watch or support African Felon Rugby as the game has been poisoned by the liberal left when the (((owners))) not only took the 'woke' bait but swallowed the entire boat in the process. There are a few white guys with common sense left in that league, Rogers is clearly one of them.
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
26,702
Location
North Carolina

Mengele​

Fauci Takes Professional Gaslighting to New Levels, Now Admitting Children Hospitalized COVID Cases is Wrong

December 30, 2021 | Sundance | 118 Comments

This admission is exactly what people have been arguing for two years. This exact point, and the “with COVID -vs- from COVID” argument within the false narrative, is what justified Big Tech to ban COVID critics from their speech platforms.

I’m not going to comment further; at a certain point these reversals just get silly. WATCH:





Suddenly, as the magic politics of COVID infection rates turns into a liability, the accuracy of hospitalized COVID tests is something to clarify.

These officials are just throwing magic beans into the audience at this point. In the past ten days, the CDC, NIH and FDA have jumped so far over the justification shark, the light from where justification shark jumping starts could not catch them for years.



CDC-cases-December-29th-1024x590.jpg
Anthony-Fauci-Rachel-Maddow-1024x584.jpg

Fauci believes in noble lies
- the masks don’t work (to avoid the masses buying all the masks and leaving critical care providers short
- you need to be vaccinated to fly (it won’t protect you but more people will take the jab to avoid the hassle)
- kids are being hospitalized and dying (not true but it’ll scare more parents into jabbing kids)


These are only the ones he’s admitted - how can anyone listen to this garden gnome without thinking Cui Bono
 
Last edited:

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269
Fauci believes in noble lies
- the masks don’t work (to avoid the masses buying all the masks and leaving critical care providers short
- you need to be vaccinated to fly (it won’t protect you but more people will take the jab to avoid the hassle)
- kids are being hospitalized and dying (not true but it’ll scare more parents into jabbing kids)


These are only the ones he’s admitted - how can anyone listed to this garden gnome without thinking Cui Bono
* It is his JOB the HIGHEST PAID .gov EMPLOYEE to be prepared for this. TOTAL JOB FAILURE. Don't forget the ventilators ncy sold to the third world because they didn't want to maintain them.

*
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
26,702
Location
North Carolina
* It is his JOB the HIGHEST PAID .gov EMPLOYEE to be prepared for this. TOTAL JOB FAILURE. Don't forget the ventilators ncy sold to the third world because they didn't want to maintain them.

*

Kennedy says he and his staff get 150k a a year royalties from the patent ownership, this guy is a walking talking conflict of interest