• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
All tests for 'viruses' are total junk and have no possibliity of reliability.

Is it not possible that an external poison can come in contact with the skin and cause lumps bumps mumps and pox?
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
Shall we go around in circles.

Here's conclusion of a medical report from the 1880s:


VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous

FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF
REGISTRATION STATISTICS

by Alfred R. Wallace, LL.D.

SECOND EDITION
WITH CORRECTIONS, NOTES, AND AN APPENDIX
BY ALEXANDER WHEELER​

Wallace site comment: Published as a thirty-eight page pamphlet in 1885; a Revised Second Edition, edited by Alexander Wheeler, was printed in 1889 (this copy). To the end of this work I have appended the relevant S509, "Forty-five Years' Registration Statistics. A Correction.," a letter to the Editor which was published in The Vaccination Inquirer of 1 February 1895. Original pagination indicated within double brackets. This document with original book page numbers can also be found on the Wallace site at http://www.wku.edu/~smithch/S374-509.htm

London
EW ALLEN, 4 AVE MARIA LANE
1889

*************************


The result of this brief enquiry may be thus summarized
(I.)-Vaccination does not diminish Smallpox mortality, as shown by the 45 years of the Registrar-General's statistics, and by the deaths from Small-pox of our "re-vaccinated" soldiers and sailors being as numerous as those of the male population of the same ages of several of our large towns, although the former are picked, healthy men, while the latter include many thousands living under the most unsanitary conditions.
(2.)-While thus utterly powerless for good, vaccination * is a certain cause of disease and death in many cases, and is the probable cause of about 10,000 deaths annually by five inoculable diseases of the most terrible and disgusting character, which have increased to this extent, steadily, year by year, since vaccination has been enforced by penal laws!
*the operation itself kills many. the registrar-General gives, under the heading of Cow-pox and other effects [erysipelas, &c.] of vaccination for the years 1881-1886, the following deaths of infants under one year. In the country, 255 deaths. In London, 61. Total for 6 years, 316.--ED.
(3.)-The hospital statistics, showing a greater mortality of the unvaccinated than of the vaccinated, have been proved to be untrustworthy; while the conclusions drawn from them are shown to be necessarily false.
If these facts are true, or anything near the truth, the enforcement of vaccination by fine and imprisonment of unwilling parents, is a cruel and criminal despotism, which it behoves all true friends of humanity to denounce and oppose at every opportunity.
Such legislation, involving as it does, our health, our liberty, and our very lives, is too serious a matter to be allowed to depend on the misstatements of interested officials or the dogmas of a professional clique. Some of the misstatements and some of the ignorance on which you have relied, have been here exposed. The statistical evidence on which alone a true judgment can be founded, is as open to you as to any doctor in the land. We, therefore, demand that you, our representatives, shall fulfil your solemn duty to us in this matter, by devoting to it some personal investigation and painstaking research; and if you find that the main facts as here stated are substantially correct, we call upon you to undo without delay the evil you have done.​
WE, THEREFORE, SOLEMNLY URGE UPON YOU THE IMMEDIATE REPEAL OF THE INIQUITOUS REPEAL LAWS BY WHICH YOU HAVE FORCED UPON US A DANGEROUS AND USELESS OPERATION-AN OPERATION WHICH HAS ADMITTEDLY CAUSED MANY DEATHS, WHICH IS PROBABLY THE CAUSE OF GREATER MORTALITY THAN SMALL-POX ITSELF, BUT WHICH CANNOT BE PROVED TO HAVE EVER SAVED A SINGLE HUMAN LIFE.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
1652980135415.png
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
1652985767440.png
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Eagle
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
13,029
Reaction score
29,883
Location
North Carolina
Shall we go around in circles.

Here's conclusion of a medical report from the 1880s:


VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous

FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF
REGISTRATION STATISTICS

by Alfred R. Wallace, LL.D.

SECOND EDITION
WITH CORRECTIONS, NOTES, AND AN APPENDIX
BY ALEXANDER WHEELER​

Wallace site comment: Published as a thirty-eight page pamphlet in 1885; a Revised Second Edition, edited by Alexander Wheeler, was printed in 1889 (this copy). To the end of this work I have appended the relevant S509, "Forty-five Years' Registration Statistics. A Correction.," a letter to the Editor which was published in The Vaccination Inquirer of 1 February 1895. Original pagination indicated within double brackets. This document with original book page numbers can also be found on the Wallace site at http://www.wku.edu/~smithch/S374-509.htm

London
EW ALLEN, 4 AVE MARIA LANE
1889

*************************




The result of this brief enquiry may be thus summarized
(I.)-Vaccination does not diminish Smallpox mortality, as shown by the 45 years of the Registrar-General's statistics, and by the deaths from Small-pox of our "re-vaccinated" soldiers and sailors being as numerous as those of the male population of the same ages of several of our large towns, although the former are picked, healthy men, while the latter include many thousands living under the most unsanitary conditions.
(2.)-While thus utterly powerless for good, vaccination * is a certain cause of disease and death in many cases, and is the probable cause of about 10,000 deaths annually by five inoculable diseases of the most terrible and disgusting character, which have increased to this extent, steadily, year by year, since vaccination has been enforced by penal laws!
*the operation itself kills many. the registrar-General gives, under the heading of Cow-pox and other effects [erysipelas, &c.] of vaccination for the years 1881-1886, the following deaths of infants under one year. In the country, 255 deaths. In London, 61. Total for 6 years, 316.--ED.
(3.)-The hospital statistics, showing a greater mortality of the unvaccinated than of the vaccinated, have been proved to be untrustworthy; while the conclusions drawn from them are shown to be necessarily false.
If these facts are true, or anything near the truth, the enforcement of vaccination by fine and imprisonment of unwilling parents, is a cruel and criminal despotism, which it behoves all true friends of humanity to denounce and oppose at every opportunity.
Such legislation, involving as it does, our health, our liberty, and our very lives, is too serious a matter to be allowed to depend on the misstatements of interested officials or the dogmas of a professional clique. Some of the misstatements and some of the ignorance on which you have relied, have been here exposed. The statistical evidence on which alone a true judgment can be founded, is as open to you as to any doctor in the land. We, therefore, demand that you, our representatives, shall fulfil your solemn duty to us in this matter, by devoting to it some personal investigation and painstaking research; and if you find that the main facts as here stated are substantially correct, we call upon you to undo without delay the evil you have done.​

we have similar view on vaccination effectiveness (not) and the risk and harm that comes from trying

I don’t know how you can say all tests for viruses are junk. Most virus can be seen under SEM. Even the cheap SEMs have 10 nanometer resolution

most human viruses are more than twice that size and some are 100 times that size.

I’ve run SEM and gold sputtering and seen for myself. The problem with covid19 is indistinguishability from other coronaviruses. Then they play games like not isolating or using “it” for the PCR reference. I read they used a common cold virus for that. Makes it damn easy to find it if you look for something almost everyone has

im not convinced there’s a large scale cost effective way to quantify Covid 18 vs 19 vs other biosimilars but Im convinced you can test for and even distinguish different types by appearance. I’ll post a size table an an SEM below

all respect to you man, Im not trying to argue just to share my experience and my conclusion

1B53C543-5CBB-4452-91E6-57D5A5CBC0DB.png
2B58BD93-6BFF-4A63-B018-3D69EBC53198.jpeg
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
all respect to you man, Im not trying to argue just to share my experience and my conclusion

Good, thanks. So am I.

Nice drawings and pictures. Can you prove any of those you call viruses are actually infective, or even ALIVE as it seems they characterize 'viruses'. In other words, can you in any way prove that that lump of material pictured wants to somehow travel to a human, latch on, invade that humans cells and take them over to replicate, invade more cells and continue that process until that human sickens and expires? And if 'viruses' are obligate intracellular parasites, how do they survive outside the cell in order to find new cells to parasitize?
 

viking

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Survivor
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
8,821
we have similar view on vaccination effectiveness (not) and the risk and harm that comes from trying

I don’t know how you can say all tests for viruses are junk. Most virus can be seen under SEM. Even the cheap SEMs have 10 nanometer resolution

most human viruses are more than twice that size and some are 100 times that size.

I’ve run SEM and gold sputtering and seen for myself. The problem with covid19 is indistinguishability from other coronaviruses. Then they play games like not isolating or using “it” for the PCR reference. I read they used a common cold virus for that. Makes it damn easy to find it if you look for something almost everyone has

im not convinced there’s a large scale cost effective way to quantify Covid 18 vs 19 vs other biosimilars but Im convinced you can test for and even distinguish different types by appearance. I’ll post a size table an an SEM below

all respect to you man, Im not trying to argue just to share my experience and my conclusion

View attachment 260042View attachment 260044

Which one of those is the corona virus?
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Eagle
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
13,029
Reaction score
29,883
Location
North Carolina
Good, thanks. So am I.

Nice drawings and pictures. Can you prove any of those you call viruses are actually infective, or even ALIVE as it seems they characterize 'viruses'. In other words, can you in any way prove that that lump of material pictured wants to somehow travel to a human, latch on, invade that humans cells and take them over to replicate, invade more cells and continue that process until that human sickens and expires? And if 'viruses' are obligate intracellular parasites, how do they survive outside the cell in order to find new cells to parasitize?

my experience is filtration and chromatography to separate, concentrate, purify bacteria, virus and other particles, viral loading or density is quantitated either by assay or cytometry (a counting method). I’m no expert in these areas and only try9ng to describe my understanding. I certainly don’t understand the “infection” incentive or method

Im not experienced in Microbiology but I understand that viruses are not alive (unlike bacteria or parasites). They have no respiration or growth capability and the infected cell is what produces copies

That’s the limit of my knowledge - I’m familiar with the typical reproduction cycle they call “lytic” because the cell lyses or bursts to let the copies loose to,spread. ive understood but have no personal experience that this is observable
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Eagle
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
13,029
Reaction score
29,883
Location
North Carolina

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
13,953
Reaction score
30,848

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735

“Stop arguing about the existence of the virus”



by Jon Rappoport
May 20, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

The headline of this article has become a battle cry among some “alternative journalists,” activists, lawyers, and doctors.
As my readers know, I’ve devoted considerable space, over the past two years, to presenting evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is a scientific fairy tale, a con, and the virus doesn’t exist.
So when I hear this battle cry, I’m motivated to mention a few significant points.
Let me start by countering the claim that debating the existence of the virus is wasting time.
Here’s a shocker. A person can do more than one thing at the same time. For example, he can expose/oppose the toxic vaccine. He can expose the murderous COVID treatments (ventilators, sedatives, antiviral drugs). He can expose using simple flu-like illness to create fraudulent COVID case numbers.
And he can ALSO expose the fact that the virus has never been isolated (discovered) or sequenced.
So highlighting the non-existence of the virus doesn’t rule out dealing with other vital concerns.
This may come as a surprise, but it’s even possible to go to court to challenge a vaccine mandate, while ALSO arguing elsewhere that the virus doesn’t exist. I know. Amazing, right?
Those alarmed by “the virus doesn’t exist” also say: making that statement leaves us open to being called whackos, and leaves us unable to convince people that all our other criticisms of the pandemic are true.
I would counter that in two ways. Millions of people already believe we’re whackos, even those of us who take a sacred blood oath that the virus is real.
And second, people going against the grain, when their vital issue is still in the budding stage, are always called nuts. Trust me, there was a time when criticizing vaccines made people look like total whackos in the eyes of the general public—and it took decades of fighting the consensus to bring that criticism into the open, where many people saw the truth about jabs.
Here’s another fun fact. The entire medical cartel thrives on the insane proposition—launched with fervor more than a hundred years ago—that people suffer from thousands of distinct diseases, each of which is caused by a single germ, which must be treated by a toxic drug and prevented by a toxic vaccine.
It is this great lie that that has killed millions upon millions upon millions of people.

Therefore, the very real question about the existence of viruses in general is more than a weird preoccupation.
Next, those who claim, “OF COURSE viruses exist,” don’t know what the hell they’re talking about. They’re merely PARROTING what they learned in school or what researchers baldly claim in studies.
“Well, all virologists can’t be wrong.”
Yes, Virginia, they can all be wrong. Just as vaccinologists can all be wrong about “the remarkable safety and efficacy of vaccines.”
Some of the OF COURSE VIRUSES EXIST people are new to the way blogs and videos work. They’ve never encountered commenters in any great numbers before. So when a few dozen committed people suddenly tell them they should examine their premises more carefully and consider what really goes on in virology labs, these OF COURSE people are annoyed and irritated. They don’t like being challenged on basic issues. They don’t like feeling that the floor might suddenly shift under their feet. So they turn on their arrogance machines.
So be it.
The issue isn’t going away. Nor should it.
Despite growing digital censorship, the internet is still the Wild West in certain respects. People are going to say THE VIRUS DOESN’T EXIST, and VIRUSES DON’T EXIST.
And foundations will shake.
Foundations of the medical cartel, and foundations underlying people’s cherished assumptions.
In any area of human life, there are conflicts between “this is strategy” and “this is the truth.” There always will be.
Trying to shortchange the truth or casually say the truth is a lie doesn’t work.
NO ONE who is reading this article has ever been in a virology lab and witnessed the step by step process of “discovering a new virus.” I find that stunning. And yet all sorts of people are quite ready to assert with great finality that they know all about isolating viruses.
If by chance, someone reading this article HAS actually been in a lab and “discovered a virus,” you can bet your bottom dollar he won’t let you or me in there with a full film crew and our outlier experts asking very pointed questions about each “scientific” move he makes, as he “isolates a virus.”
To which somebody might reply: “Well, I’ve never seen a car being made in a factory, but I drive one with full confidence.”
Yes, but when the “virus discovered in a lab” results in you or someone you love being dosed with a drug or vaccine that maims you or kills your family member, you damn well should want to get into “that factory where the car is made.”
But you can’t. They won’t let you…
…Despite the fact that, as I’ve documented many times, the US medical system kills, by a very conservative estimate, 225,000 people a year, or 2.25 million people per decade. [0]
Chew on THAT for a while.
Here is one of my articles on the subject of virus isolation:
—Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus exists—
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation” should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to Dr. Andrew Kaufman [1], and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 — June 2020)” [2].
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number of compounds. Human cells, monkey cells, antibiotics, other chemicals, random genetic material.
The researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup, because they’re dropped a mucus sample from a patient in the soup. At no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally, the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN: “Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY: “…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3 cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN: “Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition [to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses.”
STUDY: “…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50 μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY: “…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2× antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN: “Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN: “Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture. Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by commercially available filters (GIBCO) [3]. Finally, bacteria may be easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used, streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated] 100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols…”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN: “There was no negative control experiment described. Control experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results. Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics, minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
—end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis—
My comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not occurring.
Dr. Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr. Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that “the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of “the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists, and you don’t have an isolated specimen of it?
Readers who are unfamiliar with my work (over 375 articles on the subject of the “pandemic” during the past year [4]) will ask: Then why are people dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.

SOURCES:
[0] https://www.jhsph.edu/research/cent...care-policy-center/Publications_PDFs/A154.pdf
[1] https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/
[2] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
[3] https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home.html
[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735

Is the virus real? Steve Kirsch suggests a debate


by Jon Rappoport
January 25, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

My readers know that, for the past two years, I’ve been making the case that the virus is a scientific fiction, a con, and a cover story for tyranny that would make Hitler, Stalin, and Mao blush with envy.

Recently, the question has been attracting wider coverage: Does SARS-CoV-2 exist?

Entrepreneur, inventor, and philanthropist, Steve Kirsch, says yes. He offers to set up a 5-hour live video debate. He’ll send his experts and other side will send theirs. They’ll go at it.

What about the usual form of scientific debate, called the written word?

Buckle up.

Kirsch: “I don’t think the folks I’d ask to do this would want to spend time writing papers…They don’t even have the time to prepare their own papers. Doing written documents is much more time consuming than talking because people spend the time to make it bulletproof.”

Heaven forbid.

Kirsch: “None of the people on our team require that all discussions be in writing only.”

Of course not. Why would his team of scientists insist on the method by which science is accomplished?

Kirsch: “One of the commenters [to an article by Kirsch] wrote this: ‘But when someone really knows their shit they would much rather handle it in a live conversation; it’s much more efficient (you don’t spend hours writing) and it reaches a wider audience, and that audience has the benefit of tone and body language to affirm (or negate) the veracity and substance of what is being said.’”

Kirsch: “I agree with that.”

Truly awesome.

Tone and body language. Yes, of course. You know, that was Galileo’s problem when he was tried by the Inquisition for insisting the Earth rotated, and journeyed around the sun. If only he’d stood up straighter and spoken with unwavering clarity (in the manner of, say, a Walter Cronkite). He might have won his case. Because tone and inflection equal science. We all realize that. Obviously, Galileo didn’t know his shit.

Spending hours writing arguments about the existence of the virus—who would have the audacity to insist on that? As Kirsch points out, his experts are busy. It’s rude to interrupt them and ask them to make their case bulletproof. Science on Video tends to be based on “we KNOW we’re sure” and “the truth is OBVIOUS” and “WE’RE the pros.” That’s good enough, and you can sell it. If you, again, display convincing tone and body language.

In medical school, they teach this. “One day you students will be called on to defend your actions and opinions with pure bullshit. I tell you that now, to prepare you for the moment. How do you shape and transmit the bullshit? Do you do it through tiresome written reports, which run the risk of exposing the truth, engraved on the page, or do you stand up before a panel and look those people in the eye and tell a story that wows them? Do you fumble to clarify a point, or do you gloss it over with a quick-hitting generality that covers a crack in your armor? Careers are won and lost on that basis.”

Kirsch believes an exchange of papers between debaters is futile. Who can, or is willing to, pore through them and analyze them? And do those written exchanges actually cover all essential points? But with video, we NEVER EVER see opponents talking past each other or quickly changing the subject to avoid unpleasant revelations. Certainly not. We never see opponents smirking like entitled monkeys and making ad hominem accusations. We never witness slippery logic sliding by before it can be isolated and corrected. We never witness grandstanding for the audience’s benefit. It’s never show biz on parade. No mainstream expert would dare intone, “Ahem, in my many years as professor of so-and-so at such-and-such, having engaged in intense research on this question, and having authored over 60 papers on this very subject…”

And then there is the suggestion, as the commenter states, that the audience can decide…on the winner in the debate. Yes. What else is a debate FOR? Science is a democracy, and the audience is the proof of the pudding. Once they vote up or down, the deed is done. This is why, in medical journals, at the bottom of every paper and study, you see the poll question: “DO YOU THINK THIS ANALYSIS IS ACCURATE? CAST YOUR BALLOT. Depending on the outcome, we will maintain the study in our archive or retract it with an apology. Everyone can vote. You do not need to be a subscriber. We work for our audience every day. If the majority of you believes one of our authors has convinced you that the moon is a slice of soft brie on a plate or an elephant’s ass, we concur. This is called consensus, and what else could science be?”

Not long ago, I crashed my Gulfstream in the Himalayas, and after a harrowing journey to the GeFunkte Hospital in Berlin, as I was lying on the operating table, two surgeons debated whether I needed one or two transplanted hearts. Later, I was told a live stream of this discussion had been piped into the hospital waiting room, and the patients expressed an overwhelming preference for two hearts, based on the charismatic presentation of Surgeon Number One, who had studied Voice and Drama at the Julliard School in New York. So…two hearts it was. You can read about the groundbreaking operation in the Medical Journal of Audience Participation.

Published blow-by-blow descriptions of “isolating viruses” are quite dense to begin with. Perhaps one person in two hundred thousand can plow through them and understand them. Therefore, the debate about the existence of a virus starts with something in writing that, for most people, is impenetrable.

It’s no surprise that these descriptions are viewed with suspicion.

“We’re the expert virologists. Only we understand what we’re doing.”

“I see. So understanding virus isolation is like understanding RNA development and insertion into lipid nanoparticles which are injected into a few billion people.”

“Yes, exactly. Only we understand that whole process.”

“Got it. I have grave doubts about everything you’re claiming about the vaccine, but I completely accept everything you’re saying about the existence of the virus.”

In this particular debate about the existence of the virus, the devil really is in the details.

The details concerning exactly how virologists believe they are isolating viruses and sequencing them. As I say, reading the studies, one sees immediately that the accounts of these procedures are laden with technical terms and technical steps.

Those elements have to be analyzed and taken apart, to see whether they make scientific sense. In fact, a debate in writing is the sane way to proceed.

Settling the question of virus-isolation via video would be quite a challenge. An exceptional amount of good will and patience, from the mainstream virologists, would be required. I’ve never seen medical “experts” show those qualities, when the basic assumptions of their professions are on the line. I’ve seen them get up on their high horse, growl, bloviate, dismiss, generalize, tap dance, boil over, accuse, pretend to be oh so reasonable, with their pants on fire.

Someone will say, “But…but, let’s wrap all this up in one sitting. Video will accomplish that. I have things to do, places to go. We live in a fast-food world, face it.”

Yes, you have to go to the store with your mask on and maintain distancing; you have to look for a restaurant that won’t make you flash your vaccine passport; you have to show up at the school board meeting to tell the members what they can do with their mandate forcing your kid to take the shot; when they refuse to listen to you, you have to sell your house, pack up your belongings, and move with the kids from New York to Florida; and all the while, you have to keep deleting voice messages from your brother who’s telling you only the injection will save you and the family wants you institutionalized.

All these and so many more to-do’s begin with the assumption that a virus exists.

So a debate on this point ought to be complete and rigorous.

If the only possibility is a video, have a go. But the written word is far superior.

“Counsel, you have a video where the defendant discusses how he can steal a billion dollars from the pension fund?”

“Yes, Your Honor. But we also have a letter of agreement between the defendant and the head of the Montebello crime family. The letter reveals the defendant has already stolen the money, and will give it to the mob in exchange for certain favors.”

“A letter, you say? Words? Sentences? In writing, on a page? Signed? And it can be read?”

“Yes, sir. Writing is an older form of expression. It’s now being phased out. But it stands up quite well. It’s bulletproof.”
 

newmisty

DUPPY CONQUERER
Site Supporter ++
Mother Lode
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
42,740
Reaction score
68,302
Location
Qmerica
Ex-WHO Scientist David Bell: Will New Pandemic Treaty Cause Permanent Lockdowns? | TEASER

May 21
2022

With the World Health Organization (WHO) set to discuss a global pandemic treaty and far-reaching amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations, we sit down with Dr. David Bell, an expert in global health and infectious disease.



“Even though it doesn’t directly change sovereignty, in effect, it does. It takes away the ability of the people of that country to make their own decisions,” says Dr. Bell.



And more importantly, these proposals will create a bureaucracy “whose existence is dependent on pandemics,” says Dr. Bell. “They’ll have a very vested interest in finding outbreaks, declaring them potential pandemics, and then responding. It’s the way that they will survive.”



And it appears that they will make lockdowns “a permanent feature of pandemic responses,” Dr. Bell says.



Dr. Bell is a public health physician. He has previously worked at the World Health Organization, as programme head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, and as director of Global Health Technologies at the Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund. He is now on the board of Pandemics, Data, and Analytics (PANDA), a group studying the world’s response to COVID-19.


 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains

Why Anger towards the Unvaccinated was Intentional Psychological Manipulation​

A look at a study from 2020​

nakedemperor.substack.com

As the first wave of the pandemic died down in 2020, the narrative was already being pushed that vaccines were the only way out. However, even before it was clear that the vaccines would predominantly be mRNA based, many were rightly hesitant to receive a novel vaccine that had been produced at warp speed.

With The Science™ so convinced that their solution was the only solution, something had to be done to increase uptake. Even though there were many opposing opinions (that were ignored), it was thought that without high rates of vaccine uptake, the pandemic would likely be prolonged.

Something had to be done about vaccine hesitancy, so along came Yale University with a study which began in July 2020. The study, which was not published online until October 2021 (once everyone was vaccinated) was to test “how persuasive messaging affects COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions”.

Recent studies had shown that explaining vaccine herd immunity increased willingness to receive a vaccine and reduced the time people would wait to get vaccinated. However, other work found that prosocial appeals did not increase vaccination intentions and prosocial concerns were absent in densely populated areas. They were unsure whether saying “get vaccinated to protect others” would increase willingness to vaccinate.

The authors of the study suggested that something else would be needed to get people to encourage others close to them to get vaccinated and to hold negative judgments of those who don’t get vaccinated.

“Viewing vaccination through the lens of a collective action problem suggests that in addition to increasing individuals’ intentions to receive a vaccine, effective public health messages would also increase people’s willingness to encourage those close to them to vaccinate and to hold negative judgments of those who do not vaccinate. By encouraging those close to them to vaccinate, people are both promoting compliance with social norms and increasing their own level of protection against the disease. Also, by judging those who do not vaccinate more negatively, they apply social pressure to others to promote cooperative behavior. This would be consistent with theories of cooperation, like indirect reciprocity or partner choice, that rely on free riders being punished or ostracized for their past actions to encourage prosocial outcomes. Thus, effective messaging could have outsized effects on promoting vaccination if it both causes people to vaccinate themselves and to encourage those around them to do so.”

They divided the study in to two experiments. The first experiment tested “a large number of treatment messages. One subgroup of messages draws on the ideas that mass vaccination is a collective action problem and highlighting the prosocial benefit of vaccination or the reputational costs that one might incur if one chooses not to vaccinate. Another subgroup of messages built on contemporary concerns about the pandemic, like issues of restricting personal freedom or economic security”.

The messages that were tested in the first experiment were:
  • Baseline (To end the COVID-19 outbreak, it is important for people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 whenever a vaccine becomes available. Getting the COVID-19 vaccine means you are much less likely to get COVID-19 or spread it to others. Vaccines are safe and widely used to prevent diseases and vaccines are estimated to save millions of lives every year.)
  • Self-Interest (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it reduces the risk that you could get sick and die. COVID-19 kills people of all ages, and even for those who are young and healthy, there is a risk of death or long-term disability. Remember, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the single best way to protect yourself from getting sick.)
  • Community Interest (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it reduces the risk that members of your family and community could get sick and die. COVID-19 kills people of all ages, and even for those who are young and healthy, there is a risk of death or long-term disability. Remember, every person who gets vaccinated reduces the risk that people you care about get sick. While you can’t do it alone, we can all protect every-one by working together and getting vaccinated.)
  • Community Interest + Guilt ((3) (Imagine how guilty you will feel if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.)
  • Community Interest + Embarrassment ((3) + Imagine how embarrassed and ashamed you will be if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.)
  • Community Interest + Anger ((3) + Imagine how angry you will be if you choose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone you care about.)
  • Not Bravery (Soldiers, fire-fighters, EMTs, and doctors are putting their lives on the line to serve others during the COVID-19 outbreak. That's bravery. But people who refuse to get vaccinated against COVID-19 when there is a vaccine available because they don't think they will get sick or aren't worried about it aren't brave, they are reckless. By not getting vaccinated, you risk the health of your family, friends, and community. There is nothing attractive and independent-minded about ignoring public health guidance to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Not getting the vaccine when it becomes available means you risk the health of others. To show strength get the vaccine so you don't get sick and take resources from other people who need them more, or risk spreading the disease to those who are at risk, some of whom can’t get a vaccine. Getting a vaccine may be inconvenient, but it works.)
  • Trust in Science (Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the most effective means of protecting your community. The only way we can beat COVID-19 is by following scientific approaches, such as vaccination. Prominent scientists believe that once available, vaccines will be the most effective tool to stop the spread of COVID-19. The people who reject getting vaccinated are typically ignorant or confused about the science. Not getting vaccinated will show people that you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand how infection spreads and who ignores or are confused about science.)
  • Personal Freedom (COVID-19 is limiting many people’s ability to live their lives as they see fit. People have had to cancel weddings, not attend funerals, and halt other activities that are important in their daily lives. On top of this, government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 limit our freedom of association and movement. Remember, each person who gets vaccinated reduces the chance that we lose our freedoms or government lockdowns return. While you can’t do it alone, we can all keep our freedom by getting vaccinated.)
  • Economic Freedom (COVID-19 is limiting many people’s ability to continue to work and provide for their families. People have lost their jobs, had their hours cut, and lost out on job opportunities because companies aren’t hiring. On top of this, government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have stopped businesses from opening up. Remember, each person who gets vaccinated reduces the chance that we lose our freedoms or government lockdowns return. While you can’t do it alone, we can all keep our ability to work and earn a living by getting vaccinated.)
  • Community Economic Benefit (Stopping COVID-19 is important because it is wreaking havoc on our economy. Thousands of people have lost their jobs and are unable to pay their bills. Many others have been laid off by their employers and do not know when they will be called to return to work. Remember, every person who gets vaccinated reduces the risk that someone else gets sick. While you can’t do it alone, we can all end this outbreak and strengthen the national economy by working together and getting vaccinated.)
This was a large trial. Over 4,000 participants were randomly assigned to one of the treatment messages or a placebo group which looked at the effectiveness of bird feeders.

The first baseline message described how important it was to receive a vaccine so as to reduce your own risk and reduce transmission. It also emphasised that it was safe, effective and saved millions of lives.

The subgroup of messages focussed on “what other people might think of someone who chooses to be a free rider by not vaccinating”.

The fourth, fifth, and sixth messages added an invocation of an emotion, Guilt, Embarrassment, or Anger, to the Community Interest message. These messages prompted people to think about how they would feel if they chose not to get vaccinated and spread COVID-19 to someone else in the future. Emotions are thought to play a role in cooperation, either by motivating an individual to take an action because of a feeling that they experience or restraining them from taking an action because of the emotional response it would provoke in others. Further, anticipated emotional states have been shown to promote various health behaviors, like vaccination.
The seventh and eighth messages evoked concerns about one’s reputation and social image, which influences their attractiveness as a cooperative partner to others. The seventh, a Not Bravery message, reframed the idea that being unafraid of the virus is not a brave action, but instead selfish, and that the way to demonstrate bravery is by getting vaccinated because it shows strength and concern for others (“To show strength get the vaccine so you don’t get sick and take resources from other people who need them more”). The eighth message was a Trust in Science message that highlights that scientists believe a vaccine will be an effective way of limiting the spread of COVID-19. This message suggests that those who do not get vaccinated do not understand science and signal this ignorance to others (“Not getting vaccinated will show people that you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand how infection spreads and who ignores or are confused about science.”).
The final three messages drew on concerns about restrictions on freedom and economic activity that were widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. A pair of messages focused on how vaccination would allow for a restoration of Personal Freedom (“Government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 limit our freedom of association and movement”) or Economic Freedom (“Government policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have stopped businesses from opening up”). These messages take a value that is commonly invoked in individuals’ decision to not vaccinate and reframed vaccination as something that would actually restore freedoms that had been taken away. The final message, Community Economic Benefit, argues that a vaccine will help return people’s financial security and strengthen the economy This message is similar to the Community Interest messages that are described above, but instead focuses on cooperating to restore the economy (“We can all end this outbreak and strengthen the national economy by working together and getting vaccinated”).

The authors found that the baseline message only produced a modest increase in intention to vaccinate. However, Community Interest plus Guilt, Embarrassment, Anger, Not bravery, Trust in Science and Personal Freedom messages all produced largest effects with Not Bravery, Community Interest and Embarrassment messages being the most promising. It was predicted that using those messages would increase vaccine uptake by 10.4 - 15.9 percent.

When they looked at the effects of the messages for advising a friend to receive a vaccine and the effect for negatively judging someone who refuses to receive one, the Not Bravery, Trust in Science, Personal Freedom, Community Interest, Guilt and Embarrassment messages all had large effects on the outcomes. The embarrassment message increased uptake by 27 percent. The Not Bravery message increased uptake by 21 percent when looking at the negative judgment of non-vaccinators.

They even broke it down further and examined what would work best on those who endorsed liberty, men versus women, age, risk takers, Democrats versus Republicans etc etc.

Next, they took the best performing messages and tested them on a nationally representative sample in September 2020.

This time, Community Interest + Embarrassment messages worked the best for vaccine uptake. When it came to giving advice to others and negative judgements of non-vaccinators, Not Bravery, Trust in Science and both Community Interest message produced the desired effects.

The most effective message when advising others was the Community Interest + Embarrassment message and the Not Bravery and Trust in Science were best for judging non-vaccinators.

With the Trust the Science message the authors noted that it “had large effects on beliefs and actions toward others but appeared ineffective in changing an individual’s own intended vaccination behavior”.

The authors conclude that

Not only does emphasizing that vaccination is a prosocial action increase uptake, but it also increases people’s willingness to pressure others to do so, both by direct persuasion and negative judgment of non-vaccinators. The latter social pressure effects may be enhanced by highlighting how embarrassing it would be to infect someone else after failing to vaccinate.
Our findings are consistent with the idea that vaccination is often treated as a social contract in which people are expected to vaccinate and those who do not are sanctioned. In addition to messages emphasizing the prosocial element of vaccination, we observed that messages that invoked reputational concerns were successful at altering judgment of those who would free ride on the contributions of others. This work could also help explain why social norm effects appear to overwhelm the incentive to free ride when vaccination rates are higher. That is, messages that increased intentions to vaccinate also increased the moralization of non-vaccinators suggesting that they are fundamentally linked to one another.
It remains important to convince the mass public of the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines to ensure that the threshold for herd immunity is reached. Our experiments provide robust evidence that appealing to protecting others has effects on intentions to get vaccinated and to apply social pressure to others to do so as well.”

The wording throughout this study is almost identical to that used over the last few years.
  • “Safe and effective”
  • “Getting vaccinated is the single best way to protect yourself”
  • “Reduces the risk that members of your family could get sick and die”
  • “How guilty would you feel?”
  • “How embarrassed and ashamed would you feel?”
  • “How angry would you be?”
  • “People who don’t get vaccinated aren’t brave but reckless”
  • “There is nothing attractive and independent minded about ignoring public health guidance”
  • “You risk the health of others”
  • “Trust the Science”
  • “People who reject vaccination are ignorant or confused about the science”
  • “Not getting vaccinated means you are probably the sort of person who doesn’t understand science”
  • “It reduces the chance of lockdowns”
How many times did you hear someone parrot one or more of the lines above almost word for word?

You may have naively believed that the fear, pressure and psychological toll of the pandemic caused your friends, family or colleagues to act in an unrecognisable way but it was all carefully planned. They conducted a study (and I’m sure this wasn’t the only one) to see which pressure points would work best on different parts of the population and then carefully released mountains of propaganda (funded by you) to turn your friends and family against you. This nudging was all done to get you to take a vaccine you decided you didn’t want.

The ethics statement in the study says the experiments conducted were fielded under an exemption granted by the University. It’s not difficult to understand why.

Whether mass vaccination was the only way out of the pandemic or not, behaviourally nudging citizens to guilt each other into taking a novel treatment was not the way a civilised society should have acted.

They wanted you to get angry in order to get vaccinated but they failed. But they wanted you to get angry, so get angry. Get angry that the population was psychologically manipulated to turn on one another. Get angry that your friends and family were nudged into parroting the phrases used in the study to make you feel guilty, stupid or embarrassed. Get angry that you were socially ostracised and de-invited from events. Get angry that your colleagues made you lose your job. And if you were one of those who tried to convince someone to get vaccinated, get angry that you were so easily manipulated.

 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Eagle
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
13,029
Reaction score
29,883
Location
North Carolina
^^

brilliant

to me though, the harder they tried the more suspicious I became

I wasnt going to get mRNA but I was thinking about getting the conventional variety - now it’s hell no and never again
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains

THEY WILL HANG FOR WHAT THEY'VE DONE -- CHRISTOPHER JAMES​

Christopher James, A Warrior Calls channel on Bitchute, joins me to discuss the many GOOD things that are happening as the enemies of humanity inevitably face justice for the many crimes they have committed. Dr. David Martin, like Christopher James, is one of many patriots who are moving mountains to bring the sociopathic murders to justice...

...and YOU can do YOUR part too:
https://prosecutenow.com/

 

Vlad The Impaler

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
3,306
Reaction score
3,085
 

specsaregood

Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
2,710
Reaction score
5,200

New Study Finds That Long COVID May Not Actually Exist​


A new National Institutes of Health (NIH) study is raising questions about just how real “long COVID” is.

The study found that there was no evidence of long-term COVID-19 infection in patients who were six or more weeks removed from the onset of symptoms, even if those patients reported that they were experiencing “long COVID.” Further, the study found that individuals who reported having long COVID were disproportionately women and individuals with history of anxiety disorders.

“Exploratory studies found no evidence of persistent viral infection, autoimmunity, or abnormal immune activation in participants with PASC,” the authors concluded. “Abnormal findings on physical examination and diagnostic testing were uncommon.”

The study enrolled 189 people with lab-documented cases of COVID-19, who were at least six weeks from the onset of symptoms, and 120 control participants who tested negative for COVID-19 antibodies. Fifty-five percent of those who had been infected reported symptoms consistent with PASC (long COVID), while 13% of the control group reported symptoms of PASC. Those who had PASC symptoms reported lower quality of life on standardized tests.

Participants were given a physical examination, lab tests and questionnaires, cognitive tests and a cardiopulmonary evaluation. The researchers concluded that there was no identifiable cause of the PASC symptoms in most cases. The authors noted some limitations, including the fact that most participants had only mild cases of COVID-19 and that the rate of PASC symptoms could be increased due to persons with symptoms being more motivated to enroll in the study.

The publication of the findings has ignited further debate about whether long COVID is a legitimate physical ailment, or more often a psychological disorder that persists after recovering from the virus. Clinical research on the subject is mixed. Some alarmists about long COVID have cited it as a reason to further impose policies like mask and vaccine mandates.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
13,735
Monkeypox, are you kidding

Okay, I admit this is a personal rant. I am absolutely beside myself because it is unfathomable to me how any sane person with one wit of common sense can fall for this ridiculous, laughable PR stunt of pharma’s, promoting the next, great killer virus – monkeypox. How can anyone possibly believe the garbage about this new scary virus that they are now spewing out?! I ask myself in total wonderment - why have so many people learned absolutely nothing from the life-destroying Covid debacle that that they are willing to accept yet another fake virus and more toxic jabs? Please tell me it isn’t so!

Albert Einstein said that three forces rule the world – 1) Stupidity 2) Fear3) Greed. The absolute truth of his hypothesis has been proven to be true in the past two and a half years. We have observed the stupidity of millions of people in believing everything pharma’s mainstream media told them about a virus that had never been isolated and cannot be proven to exist. These millions of people live in fear that if they do not get jabbed with animal pus/human stem cells/toxic chemicals they will surely die. We have witnessed the greed of everyone connected to drug/vaccine/pesticide companies become millionaires or billionaires from the sale of vaccines and eagerly await future vaccine bonanzas.

To this day, many people still wear masks, not for any practical or legal reason, but because they enjoy being subjugated to the corporatists and globalists who seek to control their every move. Fear still rules their lives. That is their choice. Now they can rejoice as they hear news of a wonderful new fake virus coming down the pike and they can again be thrust into a world of fright, lockdowns, toxic jabs, and further supplication to their masters. They will love every minute. It’s like being in a Pandemic movie but for real!

In March 2021, there was a simulated exercise of a monkeypox scare where executives from drug companies, the WHO, China, former senator Sam Nunn (who is all in with pushing pandemics), and Gates foundation personnel discussed all the ways they would set up further control of fake pandemics and design the infrastructure and propaganda that would convince the world that new and dangerous pandemics would now start arriving on a regular basis. They decided at this meeting of druggie big shots, to announce the monkeypox virus in May 2022. How did those drug/vaccine execs know exactly when the virus would decide to hit? Amazing how they did that! And as soon as their “prediction” came true and that obedient monkeypox virus showed up, mainstream media parroted pharma’s position, and health freedom groups, thrusting aside the terrain theory of viruses forming inside the body, joined in the pharma/Pasteur narrative reporting on “cases of monkeypox in Europe and Africa.”

As with Covid, the public is being propaganda-trained to blame large gatherings for the spread of monkeypox. A gay “fetish festival” in Belgium, adult saunas in Spain, travel to Africa where monkeypox apparently is all over the place, are being blamed for hundreds of “positive cases.” How do they know? How have they isolated the virus? How have they developed a test for a virus they have not isolated, and like with Covid, AIDS, and all the other viruses they have attempted to scare us with in the past, cannot even prove exists?

Pharma and anti-mandate groups have all joined together to form a harmonious chorus, sounding the alarm about the frightening possibility of another worldwide “pandemic,” how it could have come from the Wuhan lab, some bio weapons lab in the Ukraine, or just appeared out of thin air. Never mind that they haven’t isolated the virus or have an accurate test, pharma sings the praises of the vaccines being prepared to fight it. Some suggest the highly dangerous smallpox vaccine should be employed. Others say never mind about the smallpox vaccine, we’ve already ordered plenty of new monkeypox vaccines that are ready to go. Already? But of course, they knew. They predicted it over a year ago.

Pharma “scientists” never bothered to try and isolate the AIDS virus because they knew they couldn’t prove that AIDS was a singular entity, and that the truth was, the symptoms manifesting in the gay community were caused for a variety of different reasons. But by proclaiming AIDS to be a virus, they could defrost their deadly AZT cancer drug, foist it on needlessly terrified gays, killing hundreds of thousands of people who didn’t need to die. They tried the same scare tactics with a succession of other fake viruses through the decades but because pharma didn’t own mainstream media yet, those viruses/pandemics didn’t fly. Then came the Covid scam, total pharma ownership of the media, and pharma executives’ dreams of a worldwide fake pandemic and billions of dollars in vaccine revenue came true. As with AIDS, every disease known to man was called Covid. Crack your head open and die in a car accident – Covid. Pneumonia – Covid. Common cold – Covid. Etc. etc.

Now with the monkeypox, we expect every rash, every lesion, every open sore, every deep or shallow wound emitting pus will be diagnosed as monkeypox, and who can argue? There is no proof the virus exists so there can be no accurate test. We just must take the word of the pharmaceutical/medical industry that yes, indeed, that lesion is monkeypox!

So here we go again. The “Rockefeller medicine machine” that’s been around for over one hundred years and is based on the false germ theory and declares that drugs and vaccines must be deployed to attack each and every ailment that comes along, has created millions of true believers. I fervently hope that the thousands of people who understand that viruses come from within, (and their number is growing every day) will continue to educate their friends and neighbors and the health freedom community that it is imperative that we throw off decades of false conditioning. We cannot keep accepting the pharma narrative of believing in the emergence of one new virus/pandemic after another if we are to have any chance of defeating the evildoers of the pharmaceutical/medical industry and their globalist cohorts. We can be certain that they will keep pushing forward with more lies, more viruses, more vaccines, and more attempts to control us. It is our sacred duty to keep pushing back with the truth.

----- Britt Lind
 

SongSungAU

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
13,953
Reaction score
30,848
WEF is EVIL - in 5 minutes - World Economic Forum & Klaus Schwab (5 min 07 sec):

Published on May 26, 2022 by Viva CLIPS!​

If it gets removed from YouTube, it's also on Rumble...

WEF IS EVIL (in 5 short minutes)
Published May 26, 2022 by vivafrei​
.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains

PROOF DOD & DTRA FUNDED COVID-19 BIO WEAPON IN UKRAINE NOV. 2019​

We’ve pretty much proven that Covid-19 was a bioweapon, designed by the US DOD and DTRA, here’s the docs showing gov money before the WHO even named it.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains
photo_2022-05-30_02-23-33.jpg

photo_2022-05-30_02-23-21.jpg

photo_2022-05-30_02-23-16.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains
photo_2022-05-30_13-56-26.jpg

photo_2022-05-30_13-56-21.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains
photo_2022-05-29_03-39-31.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains
Long but worth reading.

Unravelling Corona Unraveled NATO​

Journalism By Going And Doing Solved The Corona Virus Puzzle And Exposed NATO's Modus Operandi​


George Webb
10 hr ago


Our research group’s brand of journalism went to all the key locations in the US, the UK, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and back to Western Europe again to unravel the CoronaVirus puzzle. Along the way, we confirmed all that our research group had reported in March 2020 with many key additional findings coming to the fore along the way. We turned out to be right on a lot of critical components of the CoronaVirus story.


Journalist George Webb outside the Erasmus Lab in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, where he repeated his claim that Gain of Function was done here on CoronaVirus from Influenza ferrets cells.

As we have said all along our six-year juggernaut for truth, bioagents leave fingerprints. Fingerprints, not speculation, solve crimes. And we found the Erasmus Lab fingerprints. The Erasmus Lab fingerprints originate from a cell line used to study Influenza. The animals used for conducting these influenza experiments are the mink and the closely related ferret for their similarity to the human respiratory system. The cell line used for these experiments is called MV!-LU.


I wrote about the ferrets testing the infectivity of various strains of Gain of Function Influenza in my book, “Spray It In Dutch”. Not many saw the connection between the Erasmus Lab and CoronaVirus when I wrote the book, but now the evidence is coming in MV1-Lu cells being genetically fingerprinted as the great parent of SARS-COV-2, just like the Erasmus Labs fingerprints on the preceding SARS and MERS viruses.


In his book, “Spray It In Dutch”, Journalist George Webb accused NATO of using the Erasmus Lab for Gain of Function work for SARS, MERS, and SARS-2.

The Chinese Ambassador is so correct - genetic fingerprints, like human fingerprints, place the involved individuals at the scene of the crime. Interesting how the Erasmus Lab was the first to discover and photograph the SARS-COV-2 virus when that eluded so many highly skilled and equipped labs all over the world.


George Webb and John Wilkins of Neighborhood News Studio discuss MV1-LU Cells used by the Erasmus Lab.

Emmie De Wit of the Erasmus Lab was the first scientist to do an electron micrograph of the SARS-COV-2 virus in February 2020 when the world was starving for CoronaVirus information.


George Webb and John Wilkins discuss the Erasmus Lab’s uncanny ability to be the first lab in the world to isolate and photograph SARS, MERS, and SARS-COV-2 after doing Gain of Function work on the same viruses.

Perhaps more importantly, my trip to Geneva ended up focusing attention on the group at the World Health Organization that is the main benefactor of the release of this new, novel, Gain of Function viruses - the WHO Secretariat. The WHO Secretariat receives all the vaccine bids at the email benassiv@who.int.


We have traced Virginia Benassi as the key recipient of a variety of pandemic bids at the WHO Secretariat in Geneva including Zika, Ebola, a new, novel virus in China in 2009, and a host of other hemorrhagic fever viruses.


Journalist George Webb dubbed the large chair sculpture outside the World Health Assembly meeting at the Palais Des Nations the “WHO Secretariat Chair”, watching over the proceeding in Geneva like a strict, hall monitor.

As I walked down Rue Rothschild to the Palais Wilson named after President Woodrow Wilson, I thought about the philanthopist’’s use of “Secretariats” to report back to him the goings-on in the various halls of government including the first League of Nations located at the Palais Wilson.


Journalist George Webb walked on a broken foot in Geneva, Switzerland from the Palais Des Nations World Health Assembly to the old Rothschild League Of Nations building at the Palais Wilson to demonstrate who might run the Secretariat at WHO.



Adolph Rothschild’s use of Secretariats as a control mechanism for world affairs through the appearance of philanthropy is the stuff of other books and authors, but I did find it interesting that almost all the buildings I was walking about where critical decisions were being made about the future of the US Constitution were originally willed by Adolph Rothschild and sons.




Much ado had been made by Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec, and Noor Bin Laden about the Palais Wilson on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” broadcast, but just one broken foot walk away was where the real action was happening last week with regard to the US Constitution’s guarantee of fundamental rights vs. the pandemic emergency powers being considered for the Secretary-General of the WHO Tedros. To Bin Laden’s credit, to she did go to the Palais Des Nations later in the week.



Again, we share everything with all news outlets including all vaccine bids going to Virginia Benassi at the WHO Secretariat. We are now just trying to get them to say “Secretariat”, and we will worry about the vaccine bids and the Erasmus Lab after that.




Subscribe to George’ Webb Task Force Orange Journal


the pieces of the puzzle...

George Webb - Investigative Journalist (Twitter)

My latest substack - Who made it? Erasmus. Who deployed it? Kolomoisky. Who benefits? The WHO.

 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains
pieces of the puzzle

Connecting Western Govts with Globalism WEF UN EU Climate Change Covid 19 and the New World Order​

This video will Show how an extremely rich set of organisations, richer than many countries, are manipulating governments and global organisations in order to implement Globalist strategies.

It will show how these Globalists strategies are effectively, and currently, transferring wealth from the treasuries of nations into the revenue streams of private corporations.

It will demonstrate how the Globalist use a generic method to implement their strategies.

It will demonstrate in detail, how this method is being used to implement measures associated with Climate Change and the Covid-19 Pandemic.

 

UcoOnca

Seeker
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
317
Reaction score
969
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) in England revealed that a total of 69,466 people died within 28 days and 178,874 people died within 60 days of getting injected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine between January 2021 and March 2022.

Vaccine Deaths – Belle Carter –

ONS published the data on deaths by vaccination status on May 16. The report included a chart titled “Number of Deaths within 28 Days of COVID-19 Vaccination in England.”

The total fatalities were broken down to 7,953 people who died positive for the virus and 61,513 people who expired due to other causes within 28 days of vaccination. During the same timeframe, a total of 14,049 people died from coronavirus and a total of 164,825 people died from other causes within 60 days of vaccination.

The data was released following dozens of Freedom of Information inquiries made to various government institutions requesting to know the number of people who died after receiving the jabs. (Related: CDC hides COVID data from the public in order to whitewash dishonest COVID narrative.)

Moreover, the U.K. Health Security Agency‘s vaccine surveillance report indicated that 92 percent of all the pandemic-related deaths in England in March were among the vaccinated population.

 

UcoOnca

Seeker
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Messages
317
Reaction score
969


In her presentation from May 22, 2022, Conversation 5 of the Better Way Conference, Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger connects the various dots, the institutions and actors working to take over world health - and what we can do to stop them.

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is a Ph.D. in Population Health and Privat-Docent at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva and Lausanne. She has been teaching and conducting research for over 25 years, has a BSc in Genetic Psychology, and a Master of Science. She has worked with WHO on pandemic management and International Health Regulation, on the Ethics Review Board, and on human-centered factors in health policy. Dr. Stuckelberger has represented scientific NGOs at the UN/WHO for the last 20 years and is the author of several books, scientific articles, and UN/EU reports.

The WHO is working towards amendments to the International Health Regulations 22 – 28 May 2022, and simultaneously, a new pandemic treaty to be finalised by 2024.

Learn more:
https://stopthewho.com
https://stopthewho.world
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
70,694
Reaction score
156,056
Location
Rocky Mountains

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
21,698
Reaction score
53,382
DYODD before ordering. I foudn this online. I have been asked more and more where to get it.

This IVM / HCQ guy in India has access to baby formula and ships to the U.S. If the brand you need isn't listed, email him directly.

https://reynoldmeds.com

The gentleman's name is Reynold Brooke, and many of us here have ordered IVM, HCQ, DOXY, and a wide variety of other meds from him. (He used to work for BuyIVM24, but has now started his own business.)

He's absolutely solid / based. (I've probably ordered around $2,000 worth of the covid meds -- and my regular heart meds -- from him and plan to continue doing so.)

If you have questions about Brands not listed on the website -- or anything else -- email him directly. (The website is new and some products are not yet listed.)

renold2876@gmail.com


BuyIVERMECTIN24

This place used to have the best prices, but ReynoldMeds (above) now seems to beat them. They also sell HCQ, DOXY, and a wide range of other generic meds. If you need something that's not listed, contact the Customer Service number below. (I ordered a 3 year supply of my heart meds for less than 1 yr costs me here in the US.)

https://buyivermectin24.com

NOTE: DO NOT ORDER FROM THE WEBSITE. It's aligned to India and shipments may be seized by the USPS. To be assured that the shipment comes via Singapore, call their Customer Service number in Florida -- 786-386-3826 -- and ask for Renold. The dude is solid and will give you price quotes, etc.

ALSO, if you need generic meds that aren't listed on the website, give him the names and he'll let you know if they can get them for you.


SafeGenericPharmacy

https://www.safegenericpharmacy.com

The order I just placed is being shipped from India, but others here report receiving shipments, via Singapore, using just the website. (No phone call required.) The prices for this source seem higher, and reports are that customer service is slow.


AllDayChemist

https://www.alldaychemist.com

Other anons report all shipments are via Singapore / Europe, no seizure problems. Customer service may not be as responsive as the other two places.