• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,567
Likes
15,707
Coming to a city near you....this is how the globalists will rule YOU.

Italians Breaking ‘Red Zone’ Quarantine Risk Up To Six Years in Prison

Italians in areas designated as coronavirus lockdown “red zones” could face as many as six years in prison if they violate quarantine or lie to public officials.

As some regions of Italy have gone into strict lockdowns to stop the second wave of the Wuhan coronavirus, many face penalties, including prison time, if they violate the new measures.

According to a report from Il Giornale, under the red zone rules, all travel except for buying food and other necessary goods is prohibited, including visiting friends and relatives.

Populist Senator Matteo Salvini’s League, along with their allies Forza Italia, has called on the Italian government to suspend taxes in areas under lockdown to save local businesses. https://t.co/O3eXgg1KLd

— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) November 8, 2020

Those caught lying to officials while trying to visit a relative or friend face a prison sentence of one to six years. Those positive for coronavirus who leave their homes and infect others can be tried for culpable epidemic transmission and face sentences between six months and three years.

A three month to 18-month prison sentence can be handed down to those who refuse to respect the lockdown rules, including fines from €500 to €5,000.

According to the Italian Health Ministry, all non-essential travel outside a home in a red zone requires the individual to carry forms provided by the government to justify their movements.

The ministry has also encouraged people to take advantage of holidays and leave during the lockdown period to reduce travel.

Matteo Salvini: Italians Get Lockdowns, Migrants Get ‘Open Ports’ https://t.co/ghG26sY3YD

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) November 2, 2020

On Friday, Calabria, Lombardy, Piedmont, and Val d’Aosta were designated as red zones, while Puglia and Sicily have been classified as “orange zones”, which are seen as medium risk.

Many businesses have struggled under lockdown measures, and populist Senator Matteo Salvini’s League has suggested the government stop collecting taxes from regions under red zone lockdown to help businesses and residents.

Gianluca Comazzi, a member of Forza Italia and ally of the League agreed, saying he would table a motion to provide tax relief in the Lombardy regional council.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...red-zone-quarantine-risk-up-six-years-prison/
 

silver solution

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Messages
2,097
Likes
756
https://news.yahoo.com/public-health-nightmare-why-strain-192104039.html

New public scare tactic......vaccines for the Rona will be useless as they valve identified mutations in the EU and the USA that are not reacting to current vaccines trials.

We're all gonna die!!!!!!
Governments have done the math they do not want to treat DEMENTIA and the Alzheimer's type diseases. I have seen a chart the cost is insane like by 2050 the whole nations budget. So they must kill off the older people before they hit the hospitals and nursing homes. This is what it appears the vaccines are for. They will also shorten life spans so younger people don't live so long. Of course there is cheap solution but that opens a big can of worms for the rich scum. Their pharmacy, hospital, Dr. businesses might (would) be destroyed. If people started taking Niacin they would stop getting sick and there goes the industries. These are simple easy to read not Science papers.
Niacin deficiency linked to dementia, Alzheimer’s, and cognitive decline https://nutritionandhealing.com/2012/06/13/the-benefits-of-high-doses-of-niacin/
Niacin benefits the brain and may play an important role in protecting against Alzheimer’s disease.

https://universityhealthnews.com/da...emory-niacin-benefits-for-alzheimers-disease/
 

silver solution

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Messages
2,097
Likes
756
Sorry old farts Times up...

View attachment 188240
Biden Coronavirus Board Member: I Don't Think Life Is Worth Living After 75, So Won't Take Flu Shots

On Monday, Joe Biden — who has claimed the mantle of president-elect while President Donald Trump continues to contest the preliminary election results — named 13 health experts to his Transition COVID-19 Advisory Board, including former Obamacare architect Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel. Back in 2014, Emanuel published an op-ed in The Atlantic saying he wants to die at age 75 because life simply isn’t worth living after that point. The op-ed isn’t just personal, either — it attempts to convince the reader that death may be preferable to living to an advanced age.



Biden named three co-chairs to the advisory board: Dr. David Kessler, who served as FDA commissioner under George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton; Dr. Vivek Murthy, the surgeon general under Barack Obama; and Dr. Marcella Nunez-Smith, an associate professor of internal medicine, public health, and management at Yale University.



Other notables on the board include Dr. Beth Cameron, who helped create a “pandemic playbook” under Obama, and Dr. Rebecca Katz, who served on the Biden campaign’s advisory committee on COVID-19. Emanuel also served on the advisory committee during the campaign.



“Dealing with the coronavirus pandemic is one of the most important battles our administration will face, and I will be informed by science and by experts,” Biden said in a statement. “The advisory board will help shape my approach to managing the surge in reported infections; ensuring vaccines are safe, effective, and distributed efficiently, equitably, and free; and protecting at-risk populations.”



As of Monday, the U.S. has neared 10 million coronavirus cases with more than 237,000 recorded deaths. Hospitalization rates and death rates are falling but the disease remains a serious concern, especially for the elderly.



Elderly Americans and those with comorbidities face the most risk from COVID-19, which makes Emanuel’s op-ed in 2014 particularly worrisome. While he began the article from a personal perspective — saying that he personally would not like to live past 75 — he later applied that same mentality to others, encouraging the elderly to embrace death rather than clinging to prolonged life.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/11/09/biden-covid-19-board-member-an-obamacare-architect-told-the-elderly-to-avoid-flu-shots-vaccines-n1132443
I have a buddy that just road his motorcycle across the whole of Thailand at 80. He is having a blast. Don't think he would agree with Emanuel.
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
Last edited:

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
You know, I'm not a violent person, haven't hit anyone else in anger in more than 50 years, but the more I see and hear fausti, I get this overriding urge to slap the living shit outa his face. This fucking moron needs to be thrown in jail for murder and treason...
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
MG201113.jpg


BF201113m.jpg


BF201113n.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,630
Likes
105,549
Location
Rocky Mountains
An amateur’s response to various fallacious criticisms against Dr. Yan’s papers


GM106 billwilliam


By billwilliam

In her two groundbreaking reports, Dr. Li-meng Yan presented preponderant evidences that SARS-CoV-2 is an artificially manipulated virus and is likely a bioweapon developed by the Chinese military. However, several critics posted fallacious arguments against her. This article will recapitulate Dr. Yan’s evidences as a point-by-point response to their arguments.

1. Question:
Proponents of the nature origin theory often quote RaTG13, the pangolin coronaviruses, and RmYN02 bat coronavirus as potential ancestors of the current pandemic3-8. But Dr. Yan said these sequences are fraudulent. Her evidences will be presented below.

Answer:
Admittedly, Dr. Yan’s 2nd paper hadn’t been publicized by the time they raised this question. The major evidences in her 2nd paper will be summarized in an outline format to answer this question.

Why RaTG13 is a fabricated sequence:
  1. RaTG13 only exists as a sequence in the online database GenBank. No live virus has ever been isolated2.
  • In a fecal swab, bacterial genes typically account for 70-90% of the data in sample sequencing2. But in the case of RaTG13 sample, which is collected from bat feces, only 0.7% of the raw sequencing reads are from bacteria2. RaTG13 is a suspicious fecal sample containing extraordinarily little bacteria.
  • The receptor binding domain (RBD) of RaTG13 does not bind the ACE2 receptors of two kinds of horseshoe bats2. How can RaTG13 be a bat coronavirus if it cannot even infect bats?
  • In the case of RNA, a genome is a long sequence made of four building blocks Adenine (A), Guanine (G), Cytosine (C), and Uracil (U). The viral RNA genetic information is read in groups of three nucleotides called codons, which correspond to specific amino acids. For instance, the codons GAU, GAC, GAA, GAG all encode the amino acid alanine. As shown, the third nucleotide in the codon is usually interchangeable. Changes in the third nucleotide will still code for the same amino acid. Mutations in the first or second nucleotide will encode a different amino acid.
If a genetic code mutates but still encodes the same amino acid, this is called “synonymous mutation.” Conversely, mutation that produces a different amino acid is called “non-synonymous mutation.”

Unless in the case of massive recombination, viruses that arise through natural evolution should have standard ratios between synonymous and non-synonymous mutations.

When comparing SARS-CoV-2 with RaTG13, the ratio of syn/non-syn mutation is abnormally high, which means RaTG13 isn’t related to SARS-CoV-2 by natural evolution2. RaTG13 is likely a fabricated sequence.
  • The critical furin-cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 is absent in RaTG132. The evolutionary origin of the furin-cleavage site is unknown.
Why the pangolin coronaviruses are fraudulent:
  1. In a 10-year study by Dr. Daszak, no coronavirus could be detected in Malayan pangolins9. How can pangolins be the intermediate host if they are not infected by coronaviruses?
  • If SARS-CoV-2 evolves from a coronavirus in pangolins, the Spike protein should have higher affinity to the pangolin ACE2 than to the human ACE2. However, two studies, one in silico and another in vitro, demonstrate that the Spike of SARS-CoV-2 binds tighter to human ACE2 than to pangolin ACE210,11. Pangolins couldn’t have been the immediate host.
  • The pangolin coronaviruses also display abnormal ratios of syn/non-syn mutation when compared to SARS-CoV-22, so the pangolin coronaviruses are probably artificial.
Why RmYN02 is fraudulent:
  1. RmYN02 also fails the test of syn/non-syn mutation ratio2. It is not a natural sequence.
  • RmYN02 doesn’t contain a functional furin cleavage site. Its PAA site is neutrally charged and cannot be recognized by the furin protease, which requires polybasic sequences. The sequence of RmYN02 is also slightly out of alignment2. There is no way its PAA site could have evolved into the PRRA furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2.
2. Question:
In her first paper, Dr. Yan pointed out that the presence of two restriction enzyme sites surrounding the spike protein’s receptor binding motif (RBM) indicates artificial cloning. One reviewer questioned Dr. Yan’s analysis and asserted the restriction sites appear naturally by chance4.

Answer:
Restriction enzymes are enzymes that can recognize and cleave specific short sequences in a gene. Digestion by restriction enzyme is a classic technique used in gene cloning, in which a gene fragment can be cut out and then a new fragment can be inserted with ligation. Genes manipulated by such a technique contains two restriction sites flanking the sequence being cut out and swapped.

The reviewer’s claim is superficial at best, because he failed to address the abnormal locations of these restriction sites, which Dr. Yan presented in her 1st paper as the evidence of artificial manipulation. The restriction sites in SARS-CoV-2 Spike gene directly flank the RBM sequence that is responsible for binding with ACE2. Restriction enzyme digestion followed by ligation can be used to replace the original sequence with other RBM sequences (maybe artificially designed) so that the virus can be engineered to bind with and infect human cells. In fact, this is exactly what a group of virologists in China have been doing. Shi Zhengli actively pursued gain-of-function experiments in which her group swapped SARS-1 RBM into the Spike of a bat coronavirus to make it capable of infecting humans13. Li Fang, another scientist, swapped the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 into a SARS-1 Spike, and the resultant chimeric virus can bind with human ACE212. Stunningly, protein sequence alignment shows that the RBMs manipulated by Li and Shi are similar to the SARS-CoV-2 RBM flanked by restriction enzymes, as shown below in Figure 5C of Dr. Yan’s 1st paper1. Natural origin shouldn’t cause the location of these restriction sites to match almost perfectly with the locations used by Li and Shi for gain-of-function experiments. The only explanation is artificial manipulation.

Figure 5C of Dr. Yan’s 1st paper1. The top SARS-CoV-2 RBM (orange) is defined by EcoRI and BstEII. The middle sequence (magenta) is the RBM swapped by Li Fang lab into a SARS-1 Spike protein. The bottom sequence (blue) is the RBM swapped by Shi Zhengli lab into the Spike protein of a different bat coronavirus.

3. Question:
A few reviewers and scholars claim the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t resemble SARS-1 Spike5-7.

Answer.
At a cursory glance, they may appear dissimilar at the sequence level. But structural level analysis reveals that the receptor binding motif (RBM) amino acid residues critical for human ACE2 binding are all “kept.” For example, the essential residues responsible for disulfide bond formation (C467, C474) and electrostatic interactions (R444, E452, R453, D454) are preserved to maintain structural integrity of the RBM1. The essential residues for hydrophobic interaction are substituted by other hydrophobic residues (I428→L, L443→F, F460→Y, L472→F, Y484→Q)1. Therefore, the SARS-CoV-2 Spike binds with human ACE2 by the same interaction that SARS-1 binds with human ACE2. The Chinese military labs probably kept the essential residues for binding human ACE2 but mutated other non-essential proteins to cover up the traces of manipulation. The availability of high-resolution structures elucidates all essential residues for virus Spike binding with human ACE2 and thus facilitates intelligent design of the RBM.

4. Question:
According to Dr. Yan’s 1st report, a furin-cleavage site was artificially inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein to enhance its infectivity. She said this is the first instance a furin-cleavage site is found in this class of SARS-like coronavirus. Several critics attacked Dr. Yan’s analysis3-6, 8. Their reasoning is that furin-cleavage sites naturally occur in several viruses3-8. The critics cited MERS5,6 and sequence RmYN023 as examples containing furin-cleavage sites.

Answer.
First of all, Dr. Yan clearly stated on pg12 of her 1st report that “within the lineage B of β coronaviruses and with the exception of SARS-CoV-2, no viruses contain a furin-cleavage site at the S1/S2 junction1.” The furin-cleavage site is a unique feature to SARS-CoV-2 and is not present in other lineage B β coronaviruses, so SARS-CoV-2 couldn’t have evolved the furin-cleavage site through homologous recombination (a process by which organisms or viruses with very close genetic similarities can swap their genes), because other members of lineage B don’t contain the furin-cleavage site. MERS is a SARS-like virus but isn’t similar enough—it doesn’t belong to lineage B.

Second, RmYN02 is already debunked by Dr. Yan’s 2nd report as being fabricated2, and thus it couldn’t have been the ancestor of SARS-CoV-2. Despite sequence similarities, the Spike protein of RmYN02 contains a proline-alanine-alanine (PAA) sequence, whereas SARS-CoV-2 contains a proline-arginine-arginine-alanine (PRRA) sequence2. Furin protease only recognizes and cleaves specific polybasic protein sequences. Alanine is an uncharged amino acid, so PAA of RmYN02 sequence doesn’t have furin cleavage function. On the other hand, arginine is positively charged, and the PRRA sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is a legitimate furin cleavage site. In addition, according to Dr. Yan, “-PAA- in RmYN02 only partially resembles the -PRRA- insertion in SARS-CoV-2 and does not appear to be an actual insertion if properly aligned2.” So, the sequence of RmYN02 is out of alignment and isn’t a correct ancestor.

Third, even though some coronaviruses of other lineages do contain furin-cleavage sites, they don’t contain the same polybasic amino acid sequences as the one in SARS-CoV-2 (PRRAR/SVA)1. None of them can be the ancestor of SARS-CoV-2.

Fourth, gene sequence alignment reveals that SARS-CoV-2 shares no more than 40% sequence identity at the Spike with other coronaviruses with furin-cleavage sites1. The low level of sequence identity precludes the possibility of homologous recombination. SARS-CoV-2 couldn’t have evolved the furin cleavage site by homologous recombination with other coronaviruses containing such sites.

Fifth, the two arginine residues (R) in the furin-cleavage site (PRRA) of SARS-CoV-2 are both encoded by the rare codon CGG1, which is the least used codon for arginine. Although different codons may encode the same amino acid (especially if the codons are only different in the third nucleoside), these synonymous codons don’t appear by the same frequency. The probability of having two rare codons in tandem is exceptionally low. This furin-cleavage site is abnormal because it is the only instance in the SARS-CoV-2 genome where the rare codons appear in tandem1. Dr. Yan suggested the choice of rare codons at the furin-cleavage site could have been the result of genetic manipulation to create a FauI restriction site1. Restriction fragment length polymorphism after FauI digestion is a convenient technique to check whether the weaponized virus preserves the furin-cleavage site in vitro1.

5. Question:
Several critics claimed that restriction enzyme digestion and ligation is an outdated technique and that more modern techniques such as whole genome synthesis4-6 should have been used if this is a bioweapon.

Answer.
Restriction enzyme digestion is an old but classic technique that is widely used in genetic engineering. Such a technique is still effective1.
In bioweapon development, usually a set of candidates are created for selection and optimization. For example, in the case of SARS-CoV-2, several artificial RBM sequences could be created, and the one with the highest binding affinity to human ACE2 is selected to create the bioweapon. The presence of two restriction sites flanking the RBM sequence enables a convenient way to swap in different artificial sequences for trial1.

Creating a set of bioweapon virus candidates with the genome synthesis approach will require synthesizing the whole genome of every single candidate, which is tedious.

6. Question:
Almost all critics argued that ZC45 shouldn’t be the template for SARS-CoV-2 because they are different by 3000 nucleotides or 10% of the genome3-6, 8.

Answer.
This is the most frequent argument by the critics, but this argument only focuses superficially on overall sequence identity while ignoring the stunning similarity in certain critical proteins. As described by Dr. Yan, SARS-CoV-2 and Zhoushan bat virus ZC45 are exceptionally similar in the amino acid sequence of these critical proteins: 94% identical in the nucleocapsid protein, 98.6% identical in the membrane protein, 95% identical in the S2 (2nd half) of the Spike protein, 94.2% identical in the Orf8 protein, and 100% identical in the E protein1.

The 94.2% identity in Orf8 and 100% identity in the E protein are very unusual. Orf8 in SARS-CoV-2 is a protein that helps the virus evade host immunity1. According to Dr. Yan, Orf8 is poorly conserved among coronaviruses. Strangely, the Orf8 of ZC45 shares a 94.2% identity with the Orf8 of SARS-CoV-2, whereas other coronaviruses don’t share more than 58% identity on that protein with SARS-CoV-21. In addition, the Envelope E protein, although conserved, is tolerant of mutations1. In fact, SARS-CoV-2 strains collected in April 2020 already displayed a few point mutations on the E protein1. If SARS-CoV-2 were of natural origin, it should have undergone significant mutations on the Orf8 and E proteins when it crossed the species barrier multiple times (purportedly from bat to bat, bat to human, bat to pangolin, or pangolin to human), but this is not what we observe. The natural origin theory cannot explain the abnormally high identity in Orf8 and E protein. The only explanation is that ZC45/ZXC21 is used as a template to create SARS-CoV-2.

The E protein of SARS-CoV-2 retained 100% identity to the E protein of ZC45 probably because the Chinese military labs chose it for its virulence. In addition to structural functions, the E protein of SARS coronavirus functions as an ion channel that enhances virulence14.

Another tell-tale phenomenon is the difference in sequence conservation between the S1 and S2 proteins. The S2 protein of SARS-CoV-2 shares 95% identity with that of ZC451. In comparison, the S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 is much less conserved, retaining only 69% identity to that of ZC451. This contrast can be reconciled by the following reasoning: The S1 protein containing the RBM is solely responsible for binding with host ACE21, and an artificial RBM is swapped in to enable the virus to bind with human ACE2. The S2 protein, however, is responsible for maintaining trimeric form of the Spike and facilitating membrane fusion after binding1. Because S2 doesn’t participate in host recognition, the original sequence (in ZC45) is kept intact.

Of course, differences in the sequences are probably introduced intentionally as a coverup. Between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45, the ORF1b gene is less conserved1. The ORF1b gene encodes several proteins responsible for viral replication1. The ORF1b of any β coronavirus can be swapped in without hindering viral replication1. The Chinese military labs probably swapped in the ORF1b of another β coronavirus1 to make SARS-CoV-2 look less similar to the template ZC45.

In contrast, the E protein is kept intact (100% amino acid sequence identity) probably because it is a major virulence factor. The Orf8 protein (94.2% sequence identity), which allows the virus to shut down host immunity, is probably retained for this reason as well.

References
1. Yan, L. et al. Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route.
2. Yan, L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon: A Truth Revealed through Uncovering a Large-Scale, Organized Scientific Fraud.
3. Koyama, T. Review 1: “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route.” The MIT Press Journal. September 25, 2020.
https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/iqty3wru/release/1
4. Lauring, A. Review 2: “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route.” The MIT Press Journal. September 25, 2020.
https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/cly5o342/release/1
5. Gallo, R. Review 3: “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route.” The MIT Press Journal. September 30, 2020.
https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/eymbro7v/release/1
6. Reitz, M. Review 4: “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route.” The MIT Press Journal. October 4, 2020.
https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/loicw441/release/1
7. Andersen, K. The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med 26, 450-455 (2020).
8. Brouillette, M. and Renner, R. Why misinformation about COVID-19’s origins keeps going viral. National Geographic website. September 18, 2020.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...virusmisinformation::rid=&sf237963153=1#close
9. Lee, J. et al. No evidence of coronaviruses or other potentially zoonotic viruses in Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) entering the wildlife trade via Malaysia. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.19.158717 (2020).
10. Piplani, S., Singh, P.K., Winkler, D.A. & Petrovsky, N. In silico comparison of spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species; significance for the possible origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. arXiv, arXiv:2005.06199 (2020).
11. Mou, H. et al. Mutations from bat ACE2 orthologs markedly enhance ACE2-Fc neutralization of SARSCoV-2. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.29.178459 (2020).
12. Shang, J. et al. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature (2020).
13. Ren, W. et al. Difference in receptor usage between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and SARS-like coronavirus of bat origin. J Virol 82, 1899-907 (2008).
14. Nieto-Torres, J.L. et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus envelope protein ion channel activity promotes virus fitness and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 10, e1004077 (2014).
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,630
Likes
105,549
Location
Rocky Mountains
Opinion: Pfizer, Biden, and the Birth of ‘Socialism With American Characteristics’

November 13, 2020 Updated: November 14, 2020

Commentary
One of the more disturbing events of our disturbing times was the revelation Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla informed the Biden campaign of the success of his company’s COVID-19 vaccine before the current president and his administration.

In fact, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said he learned about the breakthrough from media reports—this although President Trump and his people gave significant support, financial and otherwise, via Operation Warp Speed, to Bourla’s company, something the Pfizer CEO tried to deny.

Now that Trump has signed the executive order he promised making the vaccine free for all, the company stands to make a killing at taxpayer expense.

But Bourla himself had already done that. He sold $5.6 million of shares on the day of the announcement when Pfizer stock rose 8 percent. A watchdog group is calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate.

What we are witnessing is the infiltration of the Chinese system into America. We can call it “Socialism with American Characteristics,” our own version of “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.”

(Actually both are a masquerade for government-structured oligarchic capitalism—more on that later.)

We would likely see much more of this, perhaps a complete takeover by this approach, in a Biden-Harris administration.

The system in China dates back to Deng Xiaoping who rescued their economy from the extreme impoverishment that stemmed from the strictures of Marxist-Leninist-MaoZedong-thought during the Cultural Revolution. He did this by informing their citizenry he didn’t care if a cat was black or white as long it captured mice, a witty metaphor telling the Chinese people a form of capitalism was okay… up to a point.

Unfortunately, Deng, who seemed so modern, did not abandon the totalitarian aspects of communism, as we saw demonstrated since he was in charge during the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Now we have China under Xi Jinping continuing with Xi’s version of “Socialism with Chinese Characteristics,” allowing for a “socialism,” undoubtedly unrecognizable to Marx, that can make you a plutocrat billionaire as long as you or sufficient numbers of your executives are members of the CCP and mouth “egalitarian” communist rhetoric, as ludicrously hypocritical as it is.

In reality it’s a get-rich scheme for those who don’t care about despotism or can make peace with it. It’s a far more orderly system than free-market capitalism with fewer opportunities for advancement among the hoi polloi unless they join the party or leave the country.

“Socialism with American Characteristics” will be somewhat subtler at first because of the numbers of people in our society who grew up believing in such things as freedom of speech, assembly and religion, traditions of Anglo-Saxon culture that date back to the Magna Carta and have no place in Communist China or communist-anything.

Our schools, however, not to mention popular culture and a good swatch of our media, have been preparing the way for some time for the dissolution of these traditions. What are “woke-ness” and “cancel culture” but a frontal assault on free speech?

If the word “socialism” makes some of our people recoil, at least in the short run, it doesn’t matter. It’s not really socialism anyway. That’s a myth. It’s really oligarchic capitalism similar to what you have in Russia with the government determining winners and losers. China is just a spruced-up, more effective version of that with some of the rhetoric still intact and other parts altered to fit the business climate.

Marx claimed he was after the “withering away of the state.” This is the opposite.

Ours will be a country governed by an alliance of corporate giants from tech to Big Pharma (see Pfizer) in league with self-described liberal or progressive politicians who profit directly and/or indirectly from them.

The masses would remain, well, the masses.

In other words. “Socialism with American Characteristics” would be post-modern serfdom.

How do we stop it?

For now, elect Republican senators in Georgia to put a temporary brake on things.

Then we have a lot of thinking to do.


Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Oscar-nominated screenwriter, co-founder of PJMedia, and now, a columnist for The Epoch Times. His most recent books are “The GOAT” (fiction) and “I Know Best: How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If It Hasn’t Already” (nonfiction). Find him on Parler @rogerlsimon.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


Support an independent outlet at a time when it's hard to find factual news.
Share this article with your friends, and let more people know about The Epoch Times.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,630
Likes
105,549
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,630
Likes
105,549
Location
Rocky Mountains
Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office.34

Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.56 Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7

Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011

The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.1213 Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.14 Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.

Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.

Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16

The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18

How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.

Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.

Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19

The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money.

Politicisation of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.

Footnotes
  • Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare.
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
Last edited:

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
8,903
Likes
18,449
Location
North Carolina

tigerwillow1

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,256
Likes
2,200
In Oregon if covid-19 is considered to be a contributing cause of death, it's listed as a covid-19 death. I suspect "contributing" is more opinion than fact. Also, if a presumptive person gets a negative test result, they're still considered presumptive. No kidding!

"If a presumptive case tests negative for COVID-19 by an RT-PCR, NAAT, or antigen test, the case remains presumptive."
 
Last edited:

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
8,903
Likes
18,449
Location
North Carolina

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
12,358
Likes
24,967
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ticketmaster-unveils-plan-verify-vaccination-status

Read comments at the link....... don't think it will go over well. What's next ID for movies? Travel? Seems a lot of businesses will go under fast.
But the other side is a lot of mega corps are profiting........

Ticketmaster Unveils Plan To Verify Vaccination Status



by Tyler Durden

Thu, 11/12/2020 - 20:00


Twitter Facebook Reddit Email
Print


With several COVID-19 vaccines reportedly just around the corner, Ticketmaster will be verifying concert fans' vaccination status, or whether they've tested negative for the coronavirus within a 24 to 72-hour window, according to Billboard.
As we've noted several times over the past few months, immunity passports are the future of COVID-19.

The plan, still in development phase, will employ three prongs; the Ticketmaster digital app, third-party health status providers such as CLEAR Health Pass or IBM's Digital Health Pass, and testing / vaccine distribution providers such as CVS Minute Clinic and Labcorp.

Here's how it would work, if approved: After purchasing a ticket for a concert, fans would need to verify that they have already been vaccinated (which would provide approximately one year of COVID-19 protection [ZH: really?]) or test negative for coronavirus approximately 24 to 72 hours prior to the concert. The length of coverage a test would provide would be governed by regional health authorities -- if attendees of a Friday night concert had to be tested 48 hours in advance, most could start the testing process the day before the event. If it was a 24-hour window, most people would likely be tested the same day of the event at a lab or a health clinic.
Once the test was complete, the fan would instruct the lab to deliver the results to their health pass company, like CLEAR or IBM. If the tests were negative, or the fan was vaccinated, the health pass company would verify the attendee's COVID-19 status to Ticketmaster, which would then issue the fan the credentials needed to access the event. If a fan tested positive or didn't take a test to verify their status, they would not be granted access to the event. -Billboard
According to the report, Ticketmaster will not store or have access to fans' medical records, and will only receive 'green light or red light' on whether a fan is cleared to attend an event.

At present, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has yet to approve third-party health information providers for real-time verification, however Ticketmaster president Mark Yovich is confident that demand for such screening services will be in heavy demand for multiple applications such as air travel, employment verification and theme park entry.
"We’re already seeing many third-party health care providers prepare to handle the vetting -- whether that is getting a vaccine, taking a test, or other methods of review and approval - which could then be linked via a digital ticket so everyone entering the event is verified," Yovich told Billboard. "Ticketmaster’s goal is to provide enough flexibility and options that venues and fans have multiple paths to return to events, and is working to create integrations to our API and leading digital ticketing technology as we will look to tap into the top solutions based on what’s green-lit by officials and desired by clients."
For Ticketmaster, two new technologies at the companies will help its clients scale the program. The first is digital ticketing that's linked to a fan’s identity, eliminates paper tickets and can be restricted from being transferred or resold. Ticketmaster also plans to deploy its new SmartEvent system, which helps event organizers and fans manage social distancing, delayed entry and provide possible opportunities for contact tracing. Many of the safety parameters will be set by regional health officials and event organizers. Event organizers also have the ability to set their own prevention protocols, like sanitation, mask compliance and social distancing. -Billboard

According to the report, implementing this COVID-19 verification plan will be key to the survival of the live entertainment industry during the pandemic.
"In order for live events to return, technology and science are going to play huge roles in establishing integrated protocols so that fans, artists, and employees feel safe returning to venues," says Marianne Herman, co-founder and principal reBUILD20, which focuses on helping entertainment and live events companies develop COVID-19 strategies (per Billboard).
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

"Integrating ticketing platforms with the guests verified testing results is one key way to reimagine how we’re going to get fans back to live events. The experience of attending live events will look completely different, but innovation married with consistent implementation will provide a framework to get the live sports and event industry back to work."

 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
Last edited:

Voodoo

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
2,959
Likes
4,279
Location
Deep Underground Bunker

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,931
Likes
71,483
Location
third cove on the right
Coronavirus invades men’s reproductive organs, can affect their fertility



MIAMI (NewsNation Now) — More men get sick and die from COVID-19 than women do and researchers at the University of Miami may have found part of the reason why.

According to a newly released study, COVID-19 invades some men’s testicles.

Researchers at the university tested the testicles of men who died from COVID-19 and found the virus inside the reproductive organs.

But what surprised them even more, is when they tested a living man who recovered from COVID-19, the virus was still inside his testicles.

“This we were very surprised with because even after the infection was cleared he had some fevers and cold that got better. Six weeks or eight weeks later, after the infection he tested negative, but the virus was still present in the testes. This was surprising because we found the virus could probably linger in the testes a lot longer than men developed symptoms,” said Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, University of Miami.

Researchers say this may explain why 10-20% of men with COVID-19 have testicular pain.

Future studies will determine whether COVID-19 impacts male fertility.

“Patients who want to have kids in the future who haven’t completed their families, I think there is a rationale for sperm production to be affected. We are urging men who either develop testicular pain or want to have families in the future to check their sperm count to make sure they have healthy and viable sperm,” said Dr. Ramasamy.




https://www.mychamplainvalley.com/n...productive-organs-can-affect-their-fertility/
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
SSAU, you may have posted the info before but where is the chart from? Thanking you in advance.
The number of cases and deaths is from

COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU):
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

The chart is one I have kept since March of this year (using the numbers reported on the above website). I used to track the numbers daily then I got bored with it and now just grab the data from the above website when I think about it.
 
Last edited:

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
12,358
Likes
24,967
Coronavirus invades men’s reproductive organs, can affect their fertility



MIAMI (NewsNation Now) — More men get sick and die from COVID-19 than women do and researchers at the University of Miami may have found part of the reason why.

According to a newly released study, COVID-19 invades some men’s testicles.

Researchers at the university tested the testicles of men who died from COVID-19 and found the virus inside the reproductive organs.

But what surprised them even more, is when they tested a living man who recovered from COVID-19, the virus was still inside his testicles.

“This we were very surprised with because even after the infection was cleared he had some fevers and cold that got better. Six weeks or eight weeks later, after the infection he tested negative, but the virus was still present in the testes. This was surprising because we found the virus could probably linger in the testes a lot longer than men developed symptoms,” said Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, University of Miami.

Researchers say this may explain why 10-20% of men with COVID-19 have testicular pain.

Future studies will determine whether COVID-19 impacts male fertility.

“Patients who want to have kids in the future who haven’t completed their families, I think there is a rationale for sperm production to be affected. We are urging men who either develop testicular pain or want to have families in the future to check their sperm count to make sure they have healthy and viable sperm,” said Dr. Ramasamy.




https://www.mychamplainvalley.com/n...productive-organs-can-affect-their-fertility/
So what will this mean for pregnancys, baby's, childrens health, their reproduction 25 years from now...........
 

Attachments

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
Coronavirus invades men’s reproductive organs, can affect their fertility
The FEARPORN just never stops. The truth is that they don't even have a virus, so how the hell can they measure it?
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
States Ramping Up for Biggest Vaccination Effort in U.S. History + More
The Defender’s COVID Vaccine NewsWatch brings you the latest headlines on COVID-19 and vaccines.


By Children's Health Defense Team

November 13, 2020

States Ramping Up for Biggest Vaccination Effort in U.S. History. Associated Press reported:

“The push could begin as early as next month, when federal officials say the first vaccine may be authorized for emergency use and immediately deployed to high-risk groups, such as health care workers.

“‘The calvary is coming,’ Dr. Anthony Fauci said Thursday on ABC’s ‘Good Morning America.” He said he hopes shots will be available to all Americans in April, May and June.”

Bill And Melinda Gates Are Giving Another $70 Million For Covid Vaccines. Forbes reported:

“Of the newly promised $70 million, $50 million will go to the Covax Advance Market Committee of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; the committee is a financing mechanism through which Gavi works to secure equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for 92 low- and middle-income countries. The donation will unlock an additional $16 million from the U.K. government, part of a commitment the country made to match some donations to the committee.”

HHS announces COVID-19 vaccine agreement with drug stores. Modern Healthcare reported:

“The goal eventually is to make getting a COVID-19 vaccine like getting a flu shot.

“Thursday’s agreement with major chain drug stores, grocery market pharmacies and other chains and networks covers about 3 in 5 pharmacies in all 50 states and U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico. It looks ahead to a time next spring when yet-to-be-approved vaccines will start to become available beyond priority groups such as health care workers and nursing home residents.”

Infected Again or Endless COVID? How the ‘Reinfection Phenomenon’ Could Impact Vaccines, Herd Immunity and Human Behavior. USA Today reported:

“No one knows how long the immune system can keep someone safe from COVID-19 after infection.

“Some diseases like measles are one and done. Once infected or vaccinated and the immune system typically provides protection forever. With other viruses, like the common cold — some of which are closely related to the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 — protection might not last a year, or even a season.”

More
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
What? Doctor Says People Who Question Safety of COVID Vaccine Must Be Mentally Ill

In this week’s video chat with Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense’s vice chair and general counsel, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,” Mary and Polly talk about the history of using psychiatry against dissidents ... and more.

By Children's Health Defense Team

In this week’s video chat with Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense’s vice chair and general counsel, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,” Mary and Polly talk about the history of using psychiatry against dissidents and more.

Conversation at-a-Glance

In a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Bruce L. Miller suggests people who question COVID vaccines may have neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders.
A school in the UK is deploying the military to roll out mass COVID testing of students, in what appears to be a test case for how the public will respond.
Pfizer’s vaccine news this week is nothing more than a company press release — there’s no peer-reviewed data to back up claims of 90% efficacy of the drugmaker’s COVID vaccine.
The New York State Bar Association’s statement recommending a COVID vaccine mandate is significant because NY has the largest membership in the country, and Pfizer is based in New York — but it’s not legal, and Children’s Health Defense will fight it.
Through the World Freedom Alliance, with members from 30 countries, Children’s Health Defense and others are building a global movement to challenge COVID vaccine mandates.
The COVID pandemic is being used as a pretext to get to The Great Reset and create a digital ID for every human being.

More
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
‘TRUTH’ With RFK, Jr. and David Martin: Fauci’s Checkered Past, Moderna’s Warp Speed Vaccine

In the latest episode of our second season of “TRUTH” with RFK, Jr., Kennedy interviewed author and patent researcher David Martin.

By Children's Health Defense Team

In the latest episode of our second season of “TRUTH” with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Kennedy interviewed author and patent researcher David Martin. The conversation centered on Dr. Anthony Fauci’s favorite COVID vaccine candidate, Moderna.

Highlights of the discussion include:

Dr. David Martin’s company “M-CAM” and how he found a way to use intangible assets as collateral security.
The Bayh-Dole Act that led to Dr. Anthony Fauci profiting from royalties off university patents.
A SARS vaccine that was patented in March, 2019 — eight months prior to the COVID breakout.
Fauci’s involvement in dodgy deals and price fixing of medicines in the U.S.
Autism and other chronic health conditions exploded under Fauci’s watch.
Fauci’s failure to study infectious diseases and allergies despite working for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

More
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
12,358
Likes
24,967
It's been ~9 months....... what about herd immunity they were talking about? With so many positives........ asking for a friend.
 

Tbonz

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
1,566
Likes
902
Location
Land of the Free
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ticketmaster-unveils-plan-verify-vaccination-status

Read comments at the link....... don't think it will go over well. What's next ID for movies? Travel? Seems a lot of businesses will go under fast.
But the other side is a lot of mega corps are profiting........

Ticketmaster Unveils Plan To Verify Vaccination Status



by Tyler Durden

Thu, 11/12/2020 - 20:00


Twitter Facebook Reddit Email
Print


With several COVID-19 vaccines reportedly just around the corner, Ticketmaster will be verifying concert fans' vaccination status, or whether they've tested negative for the coronavirus within a 24 to 72-hour window, according to Billboard.
As we've noted several times over the past few months, immunity passports are the future of COVID-19.

The plan, still in development phase, will employ three prongs; the Ticketmaster digital app, third-party health status providers such as CLEAR Health Pass or IBM's Digital Health Pass, and testing / vaccine distribution providers such as CVS Minute Clinic and Labcorp.

Here's how it would work, if approved: After purchasing a ticket for a concert, fans would need to verify that they have already been vaccinated (which would provide approximately one year of COVID-19 protection [ZH: really?]) or test negative for coronavirus approximately 24 to 72 hours prior to the concert. The length of coverage a test would provide would be governed by regional health authorities -- if attendees of a Friday night concert had to be tested 48 hours in advance, most could start the testing process the day before the event. If it was a 24-hour window, most people would likely be tested the same day of the event at a lab or a health clinic.​
Once the test was complete, the fan would instruct the lab to deliver the results to their health pass company, like CLEAR or IBM. If the tests were negative, or the fan was vaccinated, the health pass company would verify the attendee's COVID-19 status to Ticketmaster, which would then issue the fan the credentials needed to access the event. If a fan tested positive or didn't take a test to verify their status, they would not be granted access to the event. -Billboard
According to the report, Ticketmaster will not store or have access to fans' medical records, and will only receive 'green light or red light' on whether a fan is cleared to attend an event.

At present, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has yet to approve third-party health information providers for real-time verification, however Ticketmaster president Mark Yovich is confident that demand for such screening services will be in heavy demand for multiple applications such as air travel, employment verification and theme park entry.
"We’re already seeing many third-party health care providers prepare to handle the vetting -- whether that is getting a vaccine, taking a test, or other methods of review and approval - which could then be linked via a digital ticket so everyone entering the event is verified," Yovich told Billboard. "Ticketmaster’s goal is to provide enough flexibility and options that venues and fans have multiple paths to return to events, and is working to create integrations to our API and leading digital ticketing technology as we will look to tap into the top solutions based on what’s green-lit by officials and desired by clients."
For Ticketmaster, two new technologies at the companies will help its clients scale the program. The first is digital ticketing that's linked to a fan’s identity, eliminates paper tickets and can be restricted from being transferred or resold. Ticketmaster also plans to deploy its new SmartEvent system, which helps event organizers and fans manage social distancing, delayed entry and provide possible opportunities for contact tracing. Many of the safety parameters will be set by regional health officials and event organizers. Event organizers also have the ability to set their own prevention protocols, like sanitation, mask compliance and social distancing. -Billboard

According to the report, implementing this COVID-19 verification plan will be key to the survival of the live entertainment industry during the pandemic.
"In order for live events to return, technology and science are going to play huge roles in establishing integrated protocols so that fans, artists, and employees feel safe returning to venues," says Marianne Herman, co-founder and principal reBUILD20, which focuses on helping entertainment and live events companies develop COVID-19 strategies (per Billboard).
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

"Integrating ticketing platforms with the guests verified testing results is one key way to reimagine how we’re going to get fans back to live events. The experience of attending live events will look completely different, but innovation married with consistent implementation will provide a framework to get the live sports and event industry back to work."

Fuck TicketMaster. The abuses that we are going to see will go one of two ways: 1.) People bend over and take it in the ass and become complete sheeple. 2.) People decide that they way to live free.

Most will buy into #1, the one’s that wake up and realize that they are being lied to will deal with it differently.
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,860
Likes
8,627
All the following sounds terribly familiar, and occurred 125 years ago. An excellent article by Bill Sardi.


Not the first time a vitamin deficiency has been confused with a virus.

This isn’t the first-time beriberi (vitamin B1 deficiency) has been confused for an infectious disease outbreak. A disease outbreak in 1897 was thought to be caused by an infectious agent (bacteria, virus, fungus) until it vanished when unpolished rice was substituted for vitamin B1-deficient polished rice. [Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands, 2012].

Beriberi produces symptoms of fever and infection that is confused with real microbe-induced infectious disease. Beriberi may be misdiagnosed as a viral infection and accompanying pneumonia.

The account of Nobel-Prize winner (1928) Christiaan Eijkman is instructive.

In 1886, with the germ theory of disease being prominent among physicians, the Dutch assembled a commission to determine which bacterium causes the symptoms of beri beri in preparation for creating a vaccine. However, the germ could not be isolated.

But microbiologists, narrowed focused on the germ theory of disease, doggedly continued to search for the microbe that was causing this disease. Between 1885-1906 seventeen different researchers claimed to have found the microorganism that causes beriberi.
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,080
Likes
12,105
Location
On the top shelf.

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,477
Likes
21,500
JJ201116.jpg
 

Voodoo

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
2,959
Likes
4,279
Location
Deep Underground Bunker
What? Doctor Says People Who Question Safety of COVID Vaccine Must Be Mentally Ill

In this week’s video chat with Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense’s vice chair and general counsel, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,” Mary and Polly talk about the history of using psychiatry against dissidents ... and more.

By Children's Health Defense Team

In this week’s video chat with Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense’s vice chair and general counsel, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,” Mary and Polly talk about the history of using psychiatry against dissidents and more.

Conversation at-a-Glance

In a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Bruce L. Miller suggests people who question COVID vaccines may have neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders.
A school in the UK is deploying the military to roll out mass COVID testing of students, in what appears to be a test case for how the public will respond.
Pfizer’s vaccine news this week is nothing more than a company press release — there’s no peer-reviewed data to back up claims of 90% efficacy of the drugmaker’s COVID vaccine.
The New York State Bar Association’s statement recommending a COVID vaccine mandate is significant because NY has the largest membership in the country, and Pfizer is based in New York — but it’s not legal, and Children’s Health Defense will fight it.
Through the World Freedom Alliance, with members from 30 countries, Children’s Health Defense and others are building a global movement to challenge COVID vaccine mandates.
The COVID pandemic is being used as a pretext to get to The Great Reset and create a digital ID for every human being.

More
The AMA is a disaster and a scourge on humanity. Bruce can have all of our safe vaccines.