• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Corona Virus News & Info

dacrunch

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
6,934
Likes
8,426
https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2021-02-12/sputnik-v-authorized-in-26-countries

Bloomberg
Business
Sputnik V authorized in 26 countries

February 12, 2021, 10:31
Sputnik V authorized in 26 countries

PR Newswire

MOSCOW, Feb. 12, 2021

Montenegro and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines have approved Sputnik V.

Sputnik V is among top 3 coronavirus vaccines with most authorizations granted
globally.

MOSCOW, Feb. 12, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The Russian Direct Investment Fund
(RDIF, Russia's sovereign wealth fund) announces the approval of Russian
Sputnik V vaccine against coronavirus in Montenegro and Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines. In total, 26 countries have already authorized Sputnik V.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is the first island nation of the Caribbean
to register Sputnik V.

The vaccine was approved both in Montenegro and Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines under the emergency use authorization procedure without additional
local clinical trials. Sputnik V is one of the world's top three coronavirus
vaccines in terms of the number of approvals issued by government regulators.

The vaccine had been approved earlier in Russia, Belarus, Argentina, Bolivia,
Serbia, Algeria, Palestine, Venezuela, Paraguay, Turkmenistan, Hungary, UAE,
Iran, Republic of Guinea, Tunisia, Armenia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Republika
Srpska (entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina), Lebanon, Myanmar, Pakistan,
Mongolia and Bahrain.

Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, said:

"By the end of the week Sputnik V has been approved in 26 countries in Europe,
Latin America, Middle East, Africa, Asia and North America exceeding the plan
announced by RDIF earlier. Clinical trial data published in The Lancet medical
journal demonstrated high efficacy and safety of the vaccine, which is also
easy to distribute and affordable in price. Sputnik V is recognized globally
as one of the key vaccines which will help protect the humankind and return to
normal life."

Sputnik V has a number of key advantages:

* Efficacy of Sputnik V is 91.6% as confirmed by the data published in the
Lancet, one of the world's oldest and most respected medical journals; it
is one of only three vaccines in the world with efficacy of over 90%;
Sputnik V provides full protection against severe cases of COVID-19.
* The Sputnik V vaccine is based on a proven and well-studied platform of
human adenoviral vectors, which cause the common cold and have been around
for thousands of years.
* Sputnik V uses two different vectors for the two shots in a course of
vaccination, providing immunity with a longer duration than vaccines using
the same delivery mechanism for both shots.
* The safety, efficacy and lack of negative long-term effects of adenoviral
vaccines have been proven by more than 250 clinical studies over two
decades.
* The developers of the Sputnik V vaccine are working collaboratively with
AstraZeneca on a joint clinical trial to improve the efficacy of
AstraZeneca vaccine.
* There are no strong allergies caused by Sputnik V.
* The storage temperature of Sputnik V at +2+8 C means it can be stored in a
conventional refrigerator without any need to invest in additional
cold-chain infrastructure.
* The price of Sputnik V is less than $10 per shot, making it affordable
around the world.
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
My "multi-day-usage" blue surgical mask is covered with "brown spots" from smoking RIGHT THROUGH IT....
I only wear when forced too. All my masks say "FAUCI 4 PRISON", AND leaves the "MASK POLICE" puzzled.
 

spinalcracker

On a mail train.
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
5,421
Likes
15,510
Location
On a mail train.
don’t know if this has been posted already , anyway , interesting that these blood worms that are found in horses can also be found in humans

and one of the symptoms in horses is arthritis with associated pain

hmmm , same as humans , maybe

the treatment for horses is ivermectin

the treatment for humans?

from the cdc



Acute and chronic strongyloidiasis

First line therapy
Ivermectin, in a single dose, 200 µg/kg orally for 1—2 days

Relative contraindications include the following:

Confirmed or suspected concomitant Loa loa infection
Persons weighing less than 15kg
Pregnant or lactating women
Oral ivermectin is available for human use in the United States.

Alternative

Albendazole, 400 mg orally two times a day for 7 days.

Relative contraindications:

Hypersensitivity to benzimidazole compounds or any component of product
Use should be avoided in the 1st trimester of pregnancy
Oral albendazole is available for human use in the United States.

In patients with positive stool examination for Strongyloides and persistent symptoms, follow-up stool exams should be performed 2—4 weeks after treatment to confirm clearance of infection. If recrudescence of larvae is observed, retreatment is indicated.

Hyperinfection syndrome/Disseminated strongyloidiasis

If possible, immunosuppressive therapy should be stopped or reduced, and:

Ivermectin, 200 µg/kg per day orally until stool and/or sputum exams are negative for 2 weeks.

For patients unable to tolerate oral therapy, such as those with ileus, obstruction, or known or suspected malabsorption, published case reports have demonstrated efficacy with rectal administration.

If oral and/or rectal administrations are not possible, there have been instances where Investigational New Drug (IND) exemptions for the veterinary subcutaneous formulation of ivermectin have been granted by the FDA.

Back To Top

Screening

Physicians should be particularly diligent to consider Strongyloides in patients:

Who are on or about to begin corticosteroid therapy or other immunosuppressants
Known to have HTLV-1 infection
With hematologic malignancies including leukemias and lymphomas
Who have had or are being considered for organ transplantation
With persistent peripheral or unexplained eosinophilia
With recent or remote travel histories to endemic areas.
Of note, though persons with HIV/AIDS can have disseminated strongyloidiasis or hyperinfection syndrome, observational studies have not shown an increased risk in this population.

Precautions

Standard precautions should be observed for patients hospitalized with strongyloidiasis. Wearing gloves and gowns, good hygiene, and diligent handwashing is important when coming into contact with the patient’s feces.

https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/strongyloides/health_professionals/index.html#tx
 

the_shootist

I identify as already vaccinated, bitches!
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
57,891
Likes
110,099
Location
Earth
don’t know if this has been posted already , anyway , interesting that these blood worms that are found in horses can also be found in humans

and one of the symptoms in horses is arthritis with associated pain

hmmm , same as humans , maybe

the treatment for horses is ivermectin

the treatment for humans?

from the cdc



Acute and chronic strongyloidiasis

First line therapy
Ivermectin, in a single dose, 200 µg/kg orally for 1—2 days

Relative contraindications include the following:

Confirmed or suspected concomitant Loa loa infection
Persons weighing less than 15kg
Pregnant or lactating women
Oral ivermectin is available for human use in the United States.

Alternative

Albendazole, 400 mg orally two times a day for 7 days.

Relative contraindications:

Hypersensitivity to benzimidazole compounds or any component of product
Use should be avoided in the 1st trimester of pregnancy
Oral albendazole is available for human use in the United States.

In patients with positive stool examination for Strongyloides and persistent symptoms, follow-up stool exams should be performed 2—4 weeks after treatment to confirm clearance of infection. If recrudescence of larvae is observed, retreatment is indicated.

Hyperinfection syndrome/Disseminated strongyloidiasis

If possible, immunosuppressive therapy should be stopped or reduced, and:

Ivermectin, 200 µg/kg per day orally until stool and/or sputum exams are negative for 2 weeks.

For patients unable to tolerate oral therapy, such as those with ileus, obstruction, or known or suspected malabsorption, published case reports have demonstrated efficacy with rectal administration.

If oral and/or rectal administrations are not possible, there have been instances where Investigational New Drug (IND) exemptions for the veterinary subcutaneous formulation of ivermectin have been granted by the FDA.

Back To Top

Screening

Physicians should be particularly diligent to consider Strongyloides in patients:

Who are on or about to begin corticosteroid therapy or other immunosuppressants
Known to have HTLV-1 infection
With hematologic malignancies including leukemias and lymphomas
Who have had or are being considered for organ transplantation
With persistent peripheral or unexplained eosinophilia
With recent or remote travel histories to endemic areas.
Of note, though persons with HIV/AIDS can have disseminated strongyloidiasis or hyperinfection syndrome, observational studies have not shown an increased risk in this population.

Precautions

Standard precautions should be observed for patients hospitalized with strongyloidiasis. Wearing gloves and gowns, good hygiene, and diligent handwashing is important when coming into contact with the patient’s feces.

https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/strongyloides/health_professionals/index.html#tx
I firmly believe we're entering into a true awakening phase. These drugs, which have been proven safe and now highly effective on diseases once difficult to impossible to treat, are being brought out into the light....much to the chagrin of big pharma. BP knows Pandora's box is now open and they're desperately trying to 'vaccinate' as many as possible before too many awaken and turn their poison down
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,210
Likes
9,372
WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website
by Jeffrey A. Tucker | Guest Writer
Published February 14, 2021 | Opinion

Maybe you have some sense that something fishy is going on? Same. If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t. Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not. There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t. Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not. All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools. Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren’t. It spreads in schools except it doesn’t.

On it goes. Daily. It’s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “public health authorities” say. In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding, they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives. At some point this year (for me it was March 12) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice.

Well, now I have another piece of evidence to add to the mile-high pile of fishy mess. The World Health Organization (WHO), for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity. Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science, gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century.

Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you can trace to biological reality or statistical probability theory, whichever you prefer. (It is certainly not a “strategy” so ignore any media source that describes it that way.) Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (SARS-CoV-1).

Why is this? The reason is that when a virus kills its host—that is, when a virus overtaxes the body’s ability to integrate it, its host dies and so the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads. If the virus doesn’t kill its host, it can hop to others through all the usual means. When you get a virus and fight it off, your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it. When it happens to enough people (and each case is different so we can’t put a clear number on it, especially given so many cross immunities) the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable. Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure.

This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years. Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one’s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out.

And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships. We avoided the Medieval tendency to run around with hair on fire but rather used rationality and intelligence. Even The New York Times recognizes1 that natural immunity is powerful with COVID-19, which is not in the least bit surprising.

Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization—once glorious because it was mainly responsible for the eradication of smallpox—has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,210
Likes
9,372
This letter to the above article is worth reproducing here:

Herd Immunity is a MYTH that the public at large doesn’t understand and has NEVER questioned. Also many Drs don’t understand it. If it was a genuine scientific fact the CDC would not keep moving the goalpost as to how to achieve it via vaccines, which by the way was not the intent of the original study which is based on a natural disease process. Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych wrote on her blog years ago that Herd Immunity is not a scientifically validated concept, it is not an immunologic idea, but rather an epidemiological construct and cannot be applied to vaccinated communities.

A little background:
The herd immunity theory was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher named A.W.Hedrich. His study was based on the Measles virus. He had been studying measles patterns in the US between 1900-1931 (years before any vaccine was ever invented for measles) and he observed that epidemics of the illness only occurred when less than 68% of children had developed a natural immunity to it. This was based upon the principle that children build their own immunity after suffering with or being exposed to the disease. So the herd immunity theory was, in fact, about natural disease processes and nothing to do with vaccination. If 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defenses, there would be no raging epidemic. Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase and increased the figure from 68% to 95% with no scientific justification as to why, and now stated that there had to be 100% vaccine coverage to achieve herd immunity. Essentially, they took Hedrich’s study and manipulated it to promote their vaccination programs. Essentially Herd Immunity will never be achieved via vaccination because in order for the immune system to kick in the natural infection route which is the Nasopharyngeal pathway has to be involved. Injections do not stimulate this very important process.

In 1995, Golding and Scott, published the need for strategies to make vaccines that would generate the “required” Th cell to the corresponding microorganism. Since that time, attempts to produce vaccines that would generate a “natural”- type response have failed. So, we are left with vaccines that generate “protective” responses as a second choice. How does this work? In vaccine-induced Th2 responses, called humoral responses, the body produces large quantities of specific antibodies that block the virus from entering cells. This
response is why a vaccinated child doesn’t get a full blown infection and why the child won’t spread as many viruses into the environment. However, antibodies cannot get into cells to eliminate viruses once the viruses are in the cells or cannot kill infected cells themselves. Therefore, the body has no choice other than to internalize the virus and be chronically infected when the body is forced into a Th2 antibody response. The body is essentially constipated with viruses that it cannot expel!

To suppress this natural response can be as hazardous to our health as suppressing waste elimination from the bowel or toxin release from the skin. Natural Th1 responses generate cell-mediated responses that serve to both neutralize viruses by producing antibodies and most importantly stimulate the immune cells necessary to kill any cells infected with viruses. The body works to externalize and eliminate viruses when the Th1 response is generated. So we understand now that when a Th2 response is induced, “it drives the infection deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically.” It is commonly held that the presence of antibody to viruses is a sign of a chronic on-going infection not a sign of immunity. Our bodies generally need to have Th1 cells to defend against viral, Gram-negative bacterial, and fungal infections, and tuberculosis, as well as to protect against cancer. Th2 response is necessary to protect against Gram-positive bacterial, parasitic infections, as well
as to neutralize toxins from microorganisms and the environment. A balance of Th1/Th2 cells in the body is defined as immunostasis (or immune balance) and is required for optimum health and wellness. Vaccines promote a failure in immunostasis by making the Th2-type cells dominant.

Golding S., Scott DE., Vaccine Strategy: Targeting Helper T Cell Responses. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 754:126-137, May 31, 1995
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
Standard precautions should be observed for patients hospitalized with strongyloidiasis. Wearing gloves and gowns, good hygiene, and diligent handwashing ......
A lot these "Instructions" resemble the families I grew up around that keep plastic vinyl on the sofas and chairs. Most had kids with bad hay fever and allergic to damn near everything, hence the "Made where peanuts and nut products are used" warning labels on certain products. We ate apples, peaches, and berries straight off the plants. (We did hose off any bird shit) . We usually ate lunch outside between baseball games or during a break time in the What Next Category with dirty hands (gasp) and sharing drinks or soda pops not even wiping the tops.
I truly worry about our youth and the BS, Nanny, Alarmist state of today. Most will not have a chance unless they learn to think for themselves.
Shame on the leaders, Shame on the public education system.
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website
by Jeffrey A. Tucker | Guest Writer
Published February 14, 2021 | Opinion

Maybe you have some sense that something fishy is going on? Same. If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t. Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not. There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t. Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not. All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools. Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren’t. It spreads in schools except it doesn’t.

On it goes. Daily. It’s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “public health authorities” say. In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding, they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives. At some point this year (for me it was March 12) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice.

Well, now I have another piece of evidence to add to the mile-high pile of fishy mess. The World Health Organization (WHO), for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity. Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science, gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century.

Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you can trace to biological reality or statistical probability theory, whichever you prefer. (It is certainly not a “strategy” so ignore any media source that describes it that way.) Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (SARS-CoV-1).

Why is this? The reason is that when a virus kills its host—that is, when a virus overtaxes the body’s ability to integrate it, its host dies and so the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads. If the virus doesn’t kill its host, it can hop to others through all the usual means. When you get a virus and fight it off, your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it. When it happens to enough people (and each case is different so we can’t put a clear number on it, especially given so many cross immunities) the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable. Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure.

This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years. Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one’s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out.

And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships. We avoided the Medieval tendency to run around with hair on fire but rather used rationality and intelligence. Even The New York Times recognizes1 that natural immunity is powerful with COVID-19, which is not in the least bit surprising.

Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization—once glorious because it was mainly responsible for the eradication of smallpox—has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.
Now that Trump is gone and Bidet is a "team player" WHO has dropped their actions to prove the China /Wuflu virus was created in China.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,210
Likes
9,372
It all boils down to this little gem...

God forgot copy 2.jpg
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
6,210
Likes
9,372

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,244
Likes
29,746
https://thecoloradoherald.com/2021/doctor-suffers-miscarriage-one-week-after-vaccine/


Doctor suffers miscarriage one week after vaccine
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print
Sara Beltran Ponce, MD tweeted on January 28th that she was proud to have just received the COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has not been tested on pregnant women, but the physician felt like it was safe for her unborn child.
Per the CDC website, COVID-19 vaccination trials on pregnant women are planned, but so far the vaccine has only been tested on pregnant rats.
  • “Limited data are currently available from animal developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. No safety concerns were demonstrated in rats that received Moderna COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy; studies of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are ongoing.”
  • “Studies in people who are pregnant are planned.”
  • “Both vaccine manufacturers are monitoring people in the clinical trials who became pregnant.”

Seven days after tweeting that she had received the vaccine, Beltran Ponce tweeted that she had lost her 14 1/2 week old child in the womb, who she and her husband named Eva. The doctor didn’t blame the vaccine, at least not in her tweets, but she immediately locked her twitter account to the public.
Despite no data to support the notion that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women, the CDC does not discourage pregnant women from receiving the vaccine. The wording on the CDC website reminds women of the threat of COVID-19 illness without any warnings regarding the vaccine. There are also no data or warnings issued for breastfeeding mothers.
Based on what we know at this time, pregnant people are at an increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19 and death, compared to non-pregnant people. Additionally, pregnant people with COVID-19 might be at increased risk for other adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth (delivering the baby earlier than 37 weeks).”
The CDC and the media have plenty of reasons why people, including pregnant women, should be vaccinated, but they don’t have much data to assert those claims.
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
https://thecoloradoherald.com/2021/doctor-suffers-miscarriage-one-week-after-vaccine/


Doctor suffers miscarriage one week after vaccine
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print

Sara Beltran Ponce, MD tweeted on January 28th that she was proud to have just received the COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has not been tested on pregnant women, but the physician felt like it was safe for her unborn child.
Per the CDC website, COVID-19 vaccination trials on pregnant women are planned, but so far the vaccine has only been tested on pregnant rats.
  • “Limited data are currently available from animal developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. No safety concerns were demonstrated in rats that received Moderna COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy; studies of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are ongoing.”
  • “Studies in people who are pregnant are planned.”
  • “Both vaccine manufacturers are monitoring people in the clinical trials who became pregnant.”

Seven days after tweeting that she had received the vaccine, Beltran Ponce tweeted that she had lost her 14 1/2 week old child in the womb, who she and her husband named Eva. The doctor didn’t blame the vaccine, at least not in her tweets, but she immediately locked her twitter account to the public.
Despite no data to support the notion that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women, the CDC does not discourage pregnant women from receiving the vaccine. The wording on the CDC website reminds women of the threat of COVID-19 illness without any warnings regarding the vaccine. There are also no data or warnings issued for breastfeeding mothers.
Based on what we know at this time, pregnant people are at an increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19 and death, compared to non-pregnant people. Additionally, pregnant people with COVID-19 might be at increased risk for other adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth (delivering the baby earlier than 37 weeks).”
The CDC and the media have plenty of reasons why people, including pregnant women, should be vaccinated, but they don’t have much data to assert those claims.
And her chance to carry a pregnancy full term has now been seriously compromised the rest of her life. sad, Sad to believe someone so smart & educated would trust mRNA (NON) vaccine
 

dacrunch

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
6,934
Likes
8,426
https://thecoloradoherald.com/2021/doctor-suffers-miscarriage-one-week-after-vaccine/


Doctor suffers miscarriage one week after vaccine
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print

Sara Beltran Ponce, MD tweeted on January 28th that she was proud to have just received the COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has not been tested on pregnant women, but the physician felt like it was safe for her unborn child.
Per the CDC website, COVID-19 vaccination trials on pregnant women are planned, but so far the vaccine has only been tested on pregnant rats.
  • “Limited data are currently available from animal developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. No safety concerns were demonstrated in rats that received Moderna COVID-19 vaccine before or during pregnancy; studies of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are ongoing.”
  • “Studies in people who are pregnant are planned.”
  • “Both vaccine manufacturers are monitoring people in the clinical trials who became pregnant.”

Seven days after tweeting that she had received the vaccine, Beltran Ponce tweeted that she had lost her 14 1/2 week old child in the womb, who she and her husband named Eva. The doctor didn’t blame the vaccine, at least not in her tweets, but she immediately locked her twitter account to the public.
Despite no data to support the notion that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women, the CDC does not discourage pregnant women from receiving the vaccine. The wording on the CDC website reminds women of the threat of COVID-19 illness without any warnings regarding the vaccine. There are also no data or warnings issued for breastfeeding mothers.
Based on what we know at this time, pregnant people are at an increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19 and death, compared to non-pregnant people. Additionally, pregnant people with COVID-19 might be at increased risk for other adverse outcomes, such as preterm birth (delivering the baby earlier than 37 weeks).”
The CDC and the media have plenty of reasons why people, including pregnant women, should be vaccinated, but they don’t have much data to assert those claims.
Seems to me that they ALREADY had a previous child, named EVA, who is still with them... from her tweet...
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
Seems to me that they ALREADY had a previous child, named EVA, who is still with them... from her tweet...
I certainly hope so.
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
11,338
Likes
24,257
On the lighter side...

Nation Prepares To Celebrate 1st Anniversary Of Two Weeks To Flatten The Curve (1 min 51 sec):​
Published on Feb 16, 2021 by The Babylon Bee​
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,244
Likes
29,746

Densus

Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
603
Likes
1,128
Mass vaccine clinic at Bristol Dragway opens to residents 65+; line stretches for miles

"The gates to the mass clinic opened at 9 a.m. on Tuesday. Before the gates opened, a line of vehicles extended onto Highway 394 for at least three miles. Many patients waited hours in-line to receive the vaccine. Some say it was well worth it.

"It was just our duty. We wanted it for our protection and your protection," the Calhouns said."


https://wcyb.com/news/local/mass-va...pens-to-residents-65-line-stretches-for-miles
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
12,666
Likes
17,649
Location
USSA
Mass vaccine clinic at Bristol Dragway opens to residents 65+; line stretches for miles

"The gates to the mass clinic opened at 9 a.m. on Tuesday. Before the gates opened, a line of vehicles extended onto Highway 394 for at least three miles. Many patients waited hours in-line to receive the vaccine. Some say it was well worth it.

"It was just our duty. We wanted it for our protection and your protection," the Calhouns said."


https://wcyb.com/news/local/mass-va...pens-to-residents-65-line-stretches-for-miles
Such outstanding citizens them Calhoun's are.
 

Bigfoot

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
4,340
Likes
6,021
"It was just our duty. We wanted it for our protection and your protection,"
Zank you my Calhoun minions. Zank you. Because of your great stupidity, I am one step closer to achieving a great neo-feudal reset. Hahahahahahahahahaha!

1613615150495.png
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,244
Likes
29,746
Went to auto parts store today for a snow blower belt. No signs and I walked in no masks. I asked if I had to put it on the guy said nope! I said GREAT! I need one of these. Business back to normal is a nice change. Facial expressions etc......
 

Uglytruth

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
14,244
Likes
29,746
Great page. Seems some were murdering people by denying them treatment for politics.......

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

NIH (National Institutes of Health) Revises Treatment Guidelines for Ivermectin for the Treatment of COVID-19

Ivermectin is Now a Treatment Option for Health Care Providers!
Jan 14, 2021 – One week after Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory – founding members of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – along with Dr. Andrew Hill, researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO), presented their data before the NIH Treatment Guidelines Panel, the NIH has upgraded their recommendation and now considers ivermectin an option for use in COVID-19. Read Less


Their recommendation has now been upgraded to the same level as those for widely used monoclonal antibodies & convalescent plasma, which is a “neither for nor against” recommendation. The significance of this change is that the NIH has decided to no longer recommend against the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 by the nation’s health care providers. A consequence of this change is that ivermectin has now been made a clear therapeutic option for patients.
Read our Press Release (Jan 15) and our Detailed response to the panel’s criticism of the existing evidence base (Jan 17).
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
https://xlear.com/

https://www.businesswire.com/news/h...lude-Xlear-Kills-andor-Deactivates-SARS-CoV-2

I am taking some xylitol off the shelf mixing about a tablespoon with a half teaspoon of salt in a quarter cup of water, putting in a spray bottle and using it before I go out in public, randomly a time or two during the day, and if I start feeling some sinus pressure. Has worked to alleviate sinus pressure.

Nasal Spray Xlear nasal spray alleviates congestion while gently cleaning and soothing the nasal passage. Xlear also washes away pollutants and irritants. This product is natural, fast and effective. It is also safe for daily use and is gentle enough for infants Xlear Rescue combines xylitol with pau d’arco and 4 important essential oils for a stronger, natural solution. This product contains parsley, oregano, tea tree and eucalyptus for improved upper respiratory health and fast sinus relief #
 

Attachments

Last edited:

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
Jan 14, 2021 – One week after Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory – founding members of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) – along with Dr. Andrew Hill, researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO), presented their data before the NIH Treatment Guidelines Panel, the NIH has upgraded their recommendation and now considers ivermectin an option for use in COVID-19.
Frontline covid-19 critical Care alliance.
Isn't that the group that Dr gold, the female doctor that's easy to "listen to" is from. Wasn't she indicted or arrested for being a part of the demonstrations on January 6th?

I'm just a little surprised that the NIH was open to meeting with persons from that organization.
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
https://xlear.com/

https://www.businesswire.com/news/h...lude-Xlear-Kills-andor-Deactivates-SARS-CoV-2

I am taking some xylitol off the shelf mixing about a tablespoon with a half teaspoon of salt in a quarter cup of water, putting in a spray bottle and using it before I go out in public, randomly a time or two during the day, and if I start feeling some sinus pressure. Has worked to alleviate sinus pressure.

Nasal Spray Xlear nasal spray alleviates congestion while gently cleaning and soothing the nasal passage. Xlear also washes away pollutants and irritants. This product is natural, fast and effective. It is also safe for daily use and is gentle enough for infants Xlear Rescue combines xylitol with pau d’arco and 4 important essential oils for a stronger, natural solution. This product contains parsley, oregano, tea tree and eucalyptus for improved upper respiratory health and fast sinus relief #
FYI - Main ingredient :Xylitol is a sugar alcohol / sweetener. The parsley, oregano, tea tree, and eucalyptus probably do more for you than the sugar alcohol sweetener. Xylitol probably takes the harshness away from the oregano and eucalyptus.
All those added bio-logics have history in self-help, natural cures.
Everclear or any Moonshine 150 proof or better would probably work just as well as Everclear and 150+ Moonshine can also be used in making hand sanitizer.
Here is Burbon Country last year's distilling of 150 proof + grain alcohol went for hand sanitizer for the "crisis".
 
Last edited:

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
FYI - Main ingredient :Xylitol is a sugar alcohol / sweetener. The parsley, oregano, tea tree, and eucalyptus probably do more for you than the sugar alcohol sweetener. Xylitol probably takes the harshness away from the oregano and eucalyptus.
All those added bio-logics have history in self-help, natural cures.
Everclear or any Moonshine 150 proof or better would probably work just as well as Everclear and 150+ Moonshine can also be used in making hand sanitizer.
Here is Burbon Country last year's distilling of 150 proof + grain alcohol went for hand sanitizer for the "crisis".
Lol, where are you getting your info? Are you saying I'm getting drunk from snorting xylitol? .. funny.
I don't use the one with additives. I take it straight!
So you're saying that any sugar alcohol if put in a sprayer and sprayed up the nose will kill virus and other bad things also?


I'm just trying to pass along some helpful info.
 
Last edited:

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
Goldbricx, If you don't want to get your nose drunk from sugar alcohol, there is an alternative. It's called iota carrageenan or carrageelos.

It is taken from a red seaweed. It is found in betadine cold defense nasal spray.

http://sg.betadine.com/en/sg/cold-and-flu/betadine-cold-defence-nasal-spray

This is 20 bucks and ships out of Canada. The xlear is about 12 to 13 and I think can be picked up at some pharmacies in US. If not it can be ordered through Amazon or ebay and other such stores.


The one trial that the Argentinian hospital used that resulted in zero out of 700 of their staff testing positive for a virus after 2 weeks of usage while 53% of the 420 who did not use the prescribed test ingredients tested positive after the time given for the test.

The staff that tested negative took ivermectin and the iota caraginian nasal spray.

Other tests in Europe were planning to use ivermectin and the xylitol.
 

GOLDBRIX

God,Donald Trump,most in GIM2 I Trust. OTHERS-meh
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
17,468
Likes
25,806
Lol, where are you getting your info? Are you saying I'm getting drunk from snorting xylitol? .. funny.

I don't use the one with additives. I take it straight!


So you're saying that sugar alcohol if put in a sprayer and sprayed up the nose will kill virus and other bad things also?


I'm just trying to pass along some helpful info.
I am just stating facts you may infer whatever you wish.
Me, I use C/S in a nasal spray bottle, and EIS 50ppms in my CPAP and Nebulizer. All DIY.
 

uno

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
33
Likes
50
Xylitol: Everything You Need to Know
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/xylitol-101#what-it-is

Xylitol can be processed from trees like birch or from a plant fiber called xylan (1Trusted Source).

Even though sugar alcohols are technically carbohydrates, most of them do not raise blood sugar levels and thereby don’t count as net carbs, making them popular sweeteners in low-carb products (2Trusted Source).

Though the word “alcohol” is part of its name, it’s not the same alcohol that makes you drunk. Sugar alcohols are safe for people with alcohol addictions.
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
The point is both xylitol and iota carrageenan are antiviral and antibacterial agents capable of protecting you from acquiring the virus or even colds, and even killing the virus and helping stop it from spreading.

And ivermectin too!
 

Lt Dan

Gold Pirate
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,759
Likes
9,327
Location
VA Psych Ward
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02...for-covid-19-would-abolish-need-for-vaccines/

Clip from article below see link above
Arginine/lysine balance

Lysine therapy interrupts the replication of viruses, including COVID-19 coronavirus, by countering arginine, an amino acid that fosters the eruption of dormant viruses. Lysine has been safely used for decades to quell herpes virus outbreaks that cause cold sores on the lips (herpes labialis), a treatment pioneered by one of the Bio-Virus Research team members in 1974.

Lysine is available in foods and in concentrated form in inexpensive dietary supplements (250 500-milligram lysine tablets can be purchased for under $5 US or 2-cents per tablet), making affordable lysine therapy possible.

Lysine/arginine imbalance would explain why patients who have been infected with COVID-19 have recurrent infections, even after vaccination.
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02...for-covid-19-would-abolish-need-for-vaccines/

Clip from article below see link above
Arginine/lysine balance

Lysine therapy interrupts the replication of viruses, including COVID-19 coronavirus, by countering arginine, an amino acid that fosters the eruption of dormant viruses. Lysine has been safely used for decades to quell herpes virus outbreaks that cause cold sores on the lips (herpes labialis), a treatment pioneered by one of the Bio-Virus Research team members in 1974.

Lysine is available in foods and in concentrated form in inexpensive dietary supplements (250 500-milligram lysine tablets can be purchased for under $5 US or 2-cents per tablet), making affordable lysine therapy possible.

Lysine/arginine imbalance would explain why patients who have been infected with COVID-19 have recurrent infections, even after vaccination.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02...for-covid-19-would-abolish-need-for-vaccines/

Clip from article below see link above
Arginine/lysine balance

Lysine therapy interrupts the replication of viruses, including COVID-19 coronavirus, by countering arginine, an amino acid that fosters the eruption of dormant viruses. Lysine has been safely used for decades to quell herpes virus outbreaks that cause cold sores on the lips (herpes labialis), a treatment pioneered by one of the Bio-Virus Research team members in 1974.

Lysine is available in foods and in concentrated form in inexpensive dietary supplements (250 500-milligram lysine tablets can be purchased for under $5 US or 2-cents per tablet), making affordable lysine therapy possible.

Lysine/arginine imbalance would explain why patients who have been infected with COVID-19 have recurrent infections, even after vaccination.
It says they are dormant and too much arginine or a lysine/arginine imbalance permits and promotes the un-dormancy of viruses?

Would this be a continuous therapy?

Would the virus be killed? Or just put back in dormancy.

Sounds like yet another option for treatment. Maybe this is one of the treatments that are practiced in the doctor's office and hospitals.?
 

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
MessengerRNA / mRNA - Genetic Engineering: "Because we can we should." sez Fauci, Big Pharma, Gates, Soros, ...et al. HELL NO ! sez I .
The system does not accept this sites videos. Click on the site below:
https://newtube.app/user/Darek/rjkE...DZYhJyafWdEWiLdP7-02AnXX7EYUqJMQVaAVSiUik6wvM
"Because we can we should."

This seems pretty accurate to reflect the belief and mentality of sects of our society and culture, especially the high tech and biotech sections. I believe it needs to be and will be corrected or at least constrained.

In addition to the issue of permitting people and society to choose natural immunity and natural herd immunitywhile using existing therapies or new holistic therapies: or redefining herd immunity to only apply to a bio technical vaccinated group is one such example. Just because they can, should they?


Another example is the self-driving vehicles and trucks. There is a significant percentage of truckers who enjoy professional truck driving. it is there service to their neighbor and their fellow countrymen as well as their company and self.

It brings dignity of the satisfaction of a job well done too many..

Depending on the type of service and trucking company the driver needs to coordinate is pickups and deliveries along the route, manages time, manages books, papers, amicably interact with the dock workers and receiving personnel, oh while seeing the country to various degrees depending on type of trucking operation.

Similar idea with the digital revolution where it seems that high-tech is trending towards either microchipping or carding everyone for every aspect of their lives.. Because tech theorists can envision how this could be done does that mean it should be done?

Any movement in this direction needs to be clarified and constrained by present doctrines of rights of life, individual liberties, religious rights and freedoms including the doctrine that a life must be given the opportunity to be free for the individual too glorify its creator. The technological advances ideally should be in service to humanity and these objectives not in service to doctrines of elite control.

What would happen if and when a meteor damage is a satellite or two or three during a meteor shower? Or when the power system on the satellite fails unexpectedly.

Anything that affects so many people so deeply should be carefully and thoughtfully considered.
 
Last edited:

TonyG

Formerly Agg
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
158
Likes
162
Location
Pa.
This letter to the above article is worth reproducing here:

Herd Immunity is a MYTH that the public at large doesn’t understand and has NEVER questioned. Also many Drs don’t understand it. If it was a genuine scientific fact the CDC would not keep moving the goalpost as to how to achieve it via vaccines, which by the way was not the intent of the original study which is based on a natural disease process. Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych wrote on her blog years ago that Herd Immunity is not a scientifically validated concept, it is not an immunologic idea, but rather an epidemiological construct and cannot be applied to vaccinated communities.

A little background:
The herd immunity theory was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher named A.W.Hedrich. His study was based on the Measles virus. He had been studying measles patterns in the US between 1900-1931 (years before any vaccine was ever invented for measles) and he observed that epidemics of the illness only occurred when less than 68% of children had developed a natural immunity to it. This was based upon the principle that children build their own immunity after suffering with or being exposed to the disease. So the herd immunity theory was, in fact, about natural disease processes and nothing to do with vaccination. If 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defenses, there would be no raging epidemic. Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase and increased the figure from 68% to 95% with no scientific justification as to why, and now stated that there had to be 100% vaccine coverage to achieve herd immunity. Essentially, they took Hedrich’s study and manipulated it to promote their vaccination programs. Essentially Herd Immunity will never be achieved via vaccination because in order for the immune system to kick in the natural infection route which is the Nasopharyngeal pathway has to be involved. Injections do not stimulate this very important process.

In 1995, Golding and Scott, published the need for strategies to make vaccines that would generate the “required” Th cell to the corresponding microorganism. Since that time, attempts to produce vaccines that would generate a “natural”- type response have failed. So, we are left with vaccines that generate “protective” responses as a second choice. How does this work? In vaccine-induced Th2 responses, called humoral responses, the body produces large quantities of specific antibodies that block the virus from entering cells. This
response is why a vaccinated child doesn’t get a full blown infection and why the child won’t spread as many viruses into the environment. However, antibodies cannot get into cells to eliminate viruses once the viruses are in the cells or cannot kill infected cells themselves. Therefore, the body has no choice other than to internalize the virus and be chronically infected when the body is forced into a Th2 antibody response. The body is essentially constipated with viruses that it cannot expel!

To suppress this natural response can be as hazardous to our health as suppressing waste elimination from the bowel or toxin release from the skin. Natural Th1 responses generate cell-mediated responses that serve to both neutralize viruses by producing antibodies and most importantly stimulate the immune cells necessary to kill any cells infected with viruses. The body works to externalize and eliminate viruses when the Th1 response is generated. So we understand now that when a Th2 response is induced, “it drives the infection deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically.” It is commonly held that the presence of antibody to viruses is a sign of a chronic on-going infection not a sign of immunity. Our bodies generally need to have Th1 cells to defend against viral, Gram-negative bacterial, and fungal infections, and tuberculosis, as well as to protect against cancer. Th2 response is necessary to protect against Gram-positive bacterial, parasitic infections, as well
as to neutralize toxins from microorganisms and the environment. A balance of Th1/Th2 cells in the body is defined as immunostasis (or immune balance) and is required for optimum health and wellness. Vaccines promote a failure in immunostasis by making the Th2-type cells dominant.

Golding S., Scott DE., Vaccine Strategy: Targeting Helper T Cell Responses. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 754:126-137, May 31, 1995
I really excellent explanation and article if it is accurate As It seems. Thanks for posting this. It deserves the bump I am giving it.