He doesn't look that sick to me. Shill sounds about right!
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
Corona Virus News & Info
- Thread starter stAGgering
- Start date
To Raise Confidence in COVID Vaccines Philippines Mayor Has Himself Injected With a Saline Solution
Makes me more confident already
The Department of Health in Central Visayas (DOH-7) clarified to reporters that Lapu-Lapu City Mayor Junard ‘Ahong’ Chan did not receive an actual shot of Sinovac’s COVID-19 vaccine during the city’s vaccine rollout simulation exercise on Mar. 3, 2021.
However, they confirmed that Chan is expected to come back ‘for a second dose’ this March 31 so they ‘can monitor adverse reactions after he was injected with saline solution’, and that these are just ‘part of protocols’.
“That is to tell his constituents that it is the right process,” said Dr. Mary Jean Loreche, spokesperson of DOH-7.
Source: Cebu Daily News
Makes me more confident already
The Department of Health in Central Visayas (DOH-7) clarified to reporters that Lapu-Lapu City Mayor Junard ‘Ahong’ Chan did not receive an actual shot of Sinovac’s COVID-19 vaccine during the city’s vaccine rollout simulation exercise on Mar. 3, 2021.
However, they confirmed that Chan is expected to come back ‘for a second dose’ this March 31 so they ‘can monitor adverse reactions after he was injected with saline solution’, and that these are just ‘part of protocols’.
“That is to tell his constituents that it is the right process,” said Dr. Mary Jean Loreche, spokesperson of DOH-7.
Source: Cebu Daily News
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 14,454
- Reaction score
- 30,290
https://thenewamerican.com/ex-medical-examiner-the-500000-covid-deaths-number-is-a-lie/
Ex-Medical Examiner: The “500,000 COVID Deaths” Number Is a Lie
by Selwyn Duke March 4, 2021
Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Parler Email Print
All during the coronavirus situation, masked reporters masking reality have noted, enthusiastically, every mortality milestone reached during the past year. Now it’s “500,000 Americans have died of COVID-19!” which certainly is an attention-getter. It’s also profound COVIDiocy, writes an ex-medical examiner with more than 30 years experience in death investigation. The number isn’t even remotely accurate.
After outlining his impressive résumé, that man, Dennis McGowan, explains why he calls the way SARS-CoV-2 deaths are recorded “the big lie.” He writes:
Consider: The New American recently reported that, in accordance with how the United States’ mortality rate has been increasing consistently since 2012, it did also rise in 2020. This translated into 334,477 more deaths that year than in 2019 — but not the at least 500,000 more you’d expect if the claimed China virus number was added on to what would otherwise be projected.
Obviously, the lower figure could be explained by way of there having been fewer deaths from other causes. Yet this seems fanciful.
First, presumably due to lockdowns’ psychological effects, rising markedly in 2020 were suicides and overdose deaths; in fact, the latter number, 81,000, was our nation’s highest ever. The U.S.’s homicide rate also jumped last year, by 30 percent, owing to tolerance for rioting and general civil unrest; this translates into thousands of extra deaths.
Moreover, with locked-down citizens not having received their usual medical treatments, from cancer screenings to general check-ups to remedial treatment and beyond, it’s hard to fathom that mortality from other diseases could have declined. It likely rose.
Then there are the wholly fanciful data purporting to show that the flu — which generally claims 30,000 to 60,000 lives yearly — has virtually disappeared. We’re to believe, in other words, that human interaction significant enough to spread COVID rapidly is not significant enough to spread the flu much at all.
But we don’t have to guess. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported in November that 88,280 China-virus-labeled deaths were actually caused by the flu or pneumonia, according to One America News (OAN; video below).
OAN also reported that the CDC tells us that 51,000 China-virus-labeled deaths were actually caused by heart attacks. In fairness, some observers claim that COVID can induce coronaries in certain individuals, which underlines the reality that people with comorbidities (e.g., heart disease) are most vulnerable; note that the CDC reported last summer that 94 percent of China virus “victims” had an average of 2.6 comorbidities.
Note further that this CDC data were reported when the “official” China virus death toll was 300,000; thus, the number of flu cases lumped into the COVID mortality figure would surely be higher now.
Many other testimonials align with the CDC’s assertion, too. Just consider a Project Veritas exposé from last May (video below), in which funeral directors claimed that health officials were “writing COVID on all the death certificates, whether they had a positive test or they didn’t,” as one put it.
Then there was Dr. Deborah Birx, last year’s response coordinator for the White House coronavirus task force. She admitted (video below) on April 7, 2020 that the federal government was counting anyone who died with the China virus in his system as a casualty of the disease — even though the actual cause of death could have been different — and “despite other nations doing the opposite,” reported the New York Post at the time.
So what is the actual China virus death toll? McGowan writes that “when the publicly advertised number hit 200,000, there was speculation that the actual number could be as low as 10 or 12 thousand.” Adjusting that for the current 500,000 mortality number yields a figure of 25 or 30 thousand.
McGowan says that he’d love to evaluate every death certificate in the nation so that we could know for sure. But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for transparency.
After all, politicians have justified their destructive, onerous lockdowns partially by citing artificially high mortality figures. So what would happen if they admitted that there were “only,” let’s say, for argument’s sake, 30,000 COVID deaths per “cold” season, making the disease comparable to the flu? They’d first, of course, have to relinquish the emergency powers they’ve seized using corona fears.
More significantly, though, what would happen to their political careers if they admitted that they ravaged the economy and people’s lives, and caused death, all based on an illusion?
Ex-Medical Examiner: The “500,000 COVID Deaths” Number Is a Lie
by Selwyn Duke March 4, 2021
Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Parler Email Print
All during the coronavirus situation, masked reporters masking reality have noted, enthusiastically, every mortality milestone reached during the past year. Now it’s “500,000 Americans have died of COVID-19!” which certainly is an attention-getter. It’s also profound COVIDiocy, writes an ex-medical examiner with more than 30 years experience in death investigation. The number isn’t even remotely accurate.
After outlining his impressive résumé, that man, Dennis McGowan, explains why he calls the way SARS-CoV-2 deaths are recorded “the big lie.” He writes:
Death certificates are pretty uniform in their structure, and they call for strict accuracy in listing the relevant details. There are five critical lines on a death certificate, each having its own contribution to the final conclusion.
The first (top) line is “Immediate Cause of Death.” This is where the actual terminal event is recorded. This line is followed by three more, all labeled “Due To,” where contributors to the immediate cause, in declining order, are listed. An example of this structure might be Immediate Cause listed as Cerebral Hemorrhage, and the first Due To line might be Gunshot Wound. Very direct. In the event that there are other contributors in the cascade of Due To notations, they would follow, in descending order. Finally, there is a line called “Other Significant Conditions,” which serves as a catch-all for relevant, non-fatal items. In the example above, this line might read Severe Depression to explain why there was a gunshot wound to the head.
You can imagine how many death certificates I’ve seen in my career, but you can’t imagine the number of death certificates that are being fraudulently tallied in this current pandemic. Someone in some bureaucrat’s office decided that if COVID appears anywhere on a death certificate, it is counted as a COVID death, even if it isn’t. If COVID is on the Immediate Cause line, it is clearly a COVID death. If it is on the first Due To line, it might be a COVID death in a person with a significant comorbidity. If it is on the second or third Due To line, it may or may not have a role in the death, but if it appears in the Other Significant Conditions line, it is not a COVID death, yet it is being counted as one. An example is the fellow who crashed his motorcycle and tested positive for COVID. This is fraud masquerading as science.
In reality, it has long been apparent that the China virus death numbers are cooked. We know this based not only on the testimony of those who’ve witnessed the shenanigans, but also via reason’s application.The first (top) line is “Immediate Cause of Death.” This is where the actual terminal event is recorded. This line is followed by three more, all labeled “Due To,” where contributors to the immediate cause, in declining order, are listed. An example of this structure might be Immediate Cause listed as Cerebral Hemorrhage, and the first Due To line might be Gunshot Wound. Very direct. In the event that there are other contributors in the cascade of Due To notations, they would follow, in descending order. Finally, there is a line called “Other Significant Conditions,” which serves as a catch-all for relevant, non-fatal items. In the example above, this line might read Severe Depression to explain why there was a gunshot wound to the head.
You can imagine how many death certificates I’ve seen in my career, but you can’t imagine the number of death certificates that are being fraudulently tallied in this current pandemic. Someone in some bureaucrat’s office decided that if COVID appears anywhere on a death certificate, it is counted as a COVID death, even if it isn’t. If COVID is on the Immediate Cause line, it is clearly a COVID death. If it is on the first Due To line, it might be a COVID death in a person with a significant comorbidity. If it is on the second or third Due To line, it may or may not have a role in the death, but if it appears in the Other Significant Conditions line, it is not a COVID death, yet it is being counted as one. An example is the fellow who crashed his motorcycle and tested positive for COVID. This is fraud masquerading as science.
Consider: The New American recently reported that, in accordance with how the United States’ mortality rate has been increasing consistently since 2012, it did also rise in 2020. This translated into 334,477 more deaths that year than in 2019 — but not the at least 500,000 more you’d expect if the claimed China virus number was added on to what would otherwise be projected.
Obviously, the lower figure could be explained by way of there having been fewer deaths from other causes. Yet this seems fanciful.
First, presumably due to lockdowns’ psychological effects, rising markedly in 2020 were suicides and overdose deaths; in fact, the latter number, 81,000, was our nation’s highest ever. The U.S.’s homicide rate also jumped last year, by 30 percent, owing to tolerance for rioting and general civil unrest; this translates into thousands of extra deaths.
Moreover, with locked-down citizens not having received their usual medical treatments, from cancer screenings to general check-ups to remedial treatment and beyond, it’s hard to fathom that mortality from other diseases could have declined. It likely rose.
Then there are the wholly fanciful data purporting to show that the flu — which generally claims 30,000 to 60,000 lives yearly — has virtually disappeared. We’re to believe, in other words, that human interaction significant enough to spread COVID rapidly is not significant enough to spread the flu much at all.
But we don’t have to guess. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported in November that 88,280 China-virus-labeled deaths were actually caused by the flu or pneumonia, according to One America News (OAN; video below).
OAN also reported that the CDC tells us that 51,000 China-virus-labeled deaths were actually caused by heart attacks. In fairness, some observers claim that COVID can induce coronaries in certain individuals, which underlines the reality that people with comorbidities (e.g., heart disease) are most vulnerable; note that the CDC reported last summer that 94 percent of China virus “victims” had an average of 2.6 comorbidities.
Note further that this CDC data were reported when the “official” China virus death toll was 300,000; thus, the number of flu cases lumped into the COVID mortality figure would surely be higher now.
Many other testimonials align with the CDC’s assertion, too. Just consider a Project Veritas exposé from last May (video below), in which funeral directors claimed that health officials were “writing COVID on all the death certificates, whether they had a positive test or they didn’t,” as one put it.
Then there was Dr. Deborah Birx, last year’s response coordinator for the White House coronavirus task force. She admitted (video below) on April 7, 2020 that the federal government was counting anyone who died with the China virus in his system as a casualty of the disease — even though the actual cause of death could have been different — and “despite other nations doing the opposite,” reported the New York Post at the time.
So what is the actual China virus death toll? McGowan writes that “when the publicly advertised number hit 200,000, there was speculation that the actual number could be as low as 10 or 12 thousand.” Adjusting that for the current 500,000 mortality number yields a figure of 25 or 30 thousand.
McGowan says that he’d love to evaluate every death certificate in the nation so that we could know for sure. But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for transparency.
After all, politicians have justified their destructive, onerous lockdowns partially by citing artificially high mortality figures. So what would happen if they admitted that there were “only,” let’s say, for argument’s sake, 30,000 COVID deaths per “cold” season, making the disease comparable to the flu? They’d first, of course, have to relinquish the emergency powers they’ve seized using corona fears.
More significantly, though, what would happen to their political careers if they admitted that they ravaged the economy and people’s lives, and caused death, all based on an illusion?
The Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines are still under trial until 2022/23
They have only been approved for emergency use.
Anyone vaccinated is taking part of a trial & in turn is agreeing to do so.
They have only been approved for emergency use.
Anyone vaccinated is taking part of a trial & in turn is agreeing to do so.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 6,178
"By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.11 Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:
Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. 'To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis', he said, 'we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process', Daszak stated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC, NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate nonpharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.'"
https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf
Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. 'To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis', he said, 'we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process', Daszak stated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC, NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate nonpharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.'"
https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf
Last edited:
IT’S HERE: FIRST COURT CASE AGAINST MANDATORY VACCINATION: ATTORNEY INTERVIEW
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ebHhNssHgQMd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ebHhNssHgQMd/
Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23...-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23...-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/
Just hope they don't screw it up. the section of the code that you cited in the next post should be the only argument that they have to raise.
Go read law for yourselves:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
Moderna's COVID Vaccine is an 'operating system' - is this Transhumanism?
John O'Sullivan
Principia Scientifc
Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00 UTC
Documents obtained from Moderna reveal that the so-called vaccine being peddled by the company is actually an 'operating system'. This startling admission confirms what vaccine skeptics have claimed - that COVID is about control, not a virus.
It won't be lost on anyone who has done due diligence over this pandemic to see past the glib claims of paid-off politicians and compliant media that all is not as it seems.
To start, it is no coincidence that one of the key promoters of these new mRNA 'vaccines' is none other than Microsoft billionaire, Bill Gates. Bill gave a Ted Talk where he boasted vaccines can help cut global population by 15 percent.
Yes he said cut population. How does that work - by deactivating these vaccine-implanted operating systems in us?
Well, psychopathic Bill couldn't fix his Microsoft operating system to prevent endless computer viruses, so why should we trust him now that he is spearheading what is seen as a major step towards transhumanism. For those who care about what goes into their bodies, and those of their loved ones, see if you can detect something very sinister from what is being foisted upon a gullible public.
Over at The Corbett Report readers can enlighten themselves as to the very real dangers of transhumanism - the idea of a 'fantastic future' in which humans merge fully with machines. Transhumanists take science as their religion and believe in a philosophy of "absolute relativism" that claims that individuals can change reality at will, and they seek to "relativize the human being."
Certainly, everyone who holds strong religious beliefs, in whatever faith, will baulk at what is far from a benign doctrine. Transhumanism is at complete enmity with Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc.
Do we really want to sacrifice our soul simply for the sense of security from a virus infection?
Over at tapnewswire.com contributor Weaver posts the following which is alleged to be from Moderna's documents on the new COVID-19 vaccines. It reads thus:
Our mRNA Medicines - The 'Software of Life'
When we have a concept for a new mRNA medicine and begin research, fundamental components are already in place.
Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region - the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.
We are leveraging the flexibility afforded by our platform and the fundamental role mRNA plays in protein synthesis to pursue mRNA medicines for a broad spectrum of diseases.
https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development
As always, we advise readers to take no one's word on anything and to do your own research. Please post below your comments, share with friends and family and make sure this pivotal moment in humanity's history is not a wrong step to oblivion.
John O'Sullivan
Principia Scientifc
Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00 UTC
Documents obtained from Moderna reveal that the so-called vaccine being peddled by the company is actually an 'operating system'. This startling admission confirms what vaccine skeptics have claimed - that COVID is about control, not a virus.
It won't be lost on anyone who has done due diligence over this pandemic to see past the glib claims of paid-off politicians and compliant media that all is not as it seems.
To start, it is no coincidence that one of the key promoters of these new mRNA 'vaccines' is none other than Microsoft billionaire, Bill Gates. Bill gave a Ted Talk where he boasted vaccines can help cut global population by 15 percent.
Yes he said cut population. How does that work - by deactivating these vaccine-implanted operating systems in us?
Well, psychopathic Bill couldn't fix his Microsoft operating system to prevent endless computer viruses, so why should we trust him now that he is spearheading what is seen as a major step towards transhumanism. For those who care about what goes into their bodies, and those of their loved ones, see if you can detect something very sinister from what is being foisted upon a gullible public.
Over at The Corbett Report readers can enlighten themselves as to the very real dangers of transhumanism - the idea of a 'fantastic future' in which humans merge fully with machines. Transhumanists take science as their religion and believe in a philosophy of "absolute relativism" that claims that individuals can change reality at will, and they seek to "relativize the human being."
Certainly, everyone who holds strong religious beliefs, in whatever faith, will baulk at what is far from a benign doctrine. Transhumanism is at complete enmity with Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc.
Do we really want to sacrifice our soul simply for the sense of security from a virus infection?
Over at tapnewswire.com contributor Weaver posts the following which is alleged to be from Moderna's documents on the new COVID-19 vaccines. It reads thus:
Enabling Drug Discovery & Development
We built Moderna on the guiding premise that if using mRNA as a medicine works for one disease, it should work for many diseases. And, if this is possible - given the right approach and infrastructure - it could meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.
Our Operating System
Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program" or "app" is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
We have a dedicated team of several hundred scientists and engineers solely focused on advancing Moderna's platform technology. They are organized around key disciplines and work in an integrated fashion to advance knowledge surrounding mRNA science and solve for challenges that are unique to mRNA drug development. Some of these disciplines include mRNA biology, chemistry, formulation & delivery, bioinformatics and protein engineering.
We built Moderna on the guiding premise that if using mRNA as a medicine works for one disease, it should work for many diseases. And, if this is possible - given the right approach and infrastructure - it could meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.
Our Operating System
Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program" or "app" is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.
We have a dedicated team of several hundred scientists and engineers solely focused on advancing Moderna's platform technology. They are organized around key disciplines and work in an integrated fashion to advance knowledge surrounding mRNA science and solve for challenges that are unique to mRNA drug development. Some of these disciplines include mRNA biology, chemistry, formulation & delivery, bioinformatics and protein engineering.
Our mRNA Medicines - The 'Software of Life'
When we have a concept for a new mRNA medicine and begin research, fundamental components are already in place.
Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region - the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.
We are leveraging the flexibility afforded by our platform and the fundamental role mRNA plays in protein synthesis to pursue mRNA medicines for a broad spectrum of diseases.
Within a given modality, the base components are generally identical across development candidates - formulation, 5' region and 3' region. Only the coding region varies based on the protein/s the potential medicine is directing cells to produce.
Learn how our Research Engine and Early Development Engine are enabling us to fully maximize the promise of mRNA to meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.
Overcoming Key Challenges
Using mRNA to create medicines is a complex undertaking and requires overcoming novel scientific and technical challenges. We need to get the mRNA into the targeted tissue and cells while evading the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the resultant response may limit protein production and, thus, limit the therapeutic benefit of mRNA medicines. We also need ribosomes to think the mRNA was produced naturally, so they can accurately read the instructions to produce the right protein. And we need to ensure the cells express enough of the protein to have the desired therapeutic effect.
Our multidisciplinary platform teams work together closely to address these scientific and technical challenges. This intensive cross-functional collaboration has enabled us to advance key aspects of our platform and make significant strides to deliver mRNA medicines for patients.
The above may be found on Moderna's website here:Learn how our Research Engine and Early Development Engine are enabling us to fully maximize the promise of mRNA to meaningfully improve how medicines are discovered, developed and manufactured.
Overcoming Key Challenges
Using mRNA to create medicines is a complex undertaking and requires overcoming novel scientific and technical challenges. We need to get the mRNA into the targeted tissue and cells while evading the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the resultant response may limit protein production and, thus, limit the therapeutic benefit of mRNA medicines. We also need ribosomes to think the mRNA was produced naturally, so they can accurately read the instructions to produce the right protein. And we need to ensure the cells express enough of the protein to have the desired therapeutic effect.
Our multidisciplinary platform teams work together closely to address these scientific and technical challenges. This intensive cross-functional collaboration has enabled us to advance key aspects of our platform and make significant strides to deliver mRNA medicines for patients.
https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development
As always, we advise readers to take no one's word on anything and to do your own research. Please post below your comments, share with friends and family and make sure this pivotal moment in humanity's history is not a wrong step to oblivion.
didn't Moderna pull out of the experimental drug vaccine program?
REPORT: SARS Covid-2 Is the ‘Product of Genetic Experiments Commissioned and Funded’ by Fauci’s NIAID
Fox News host Steve Hilton on Sunday shared the latest shocking findings from his months-long investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, alleging that the virus links back to U.S. commissioned research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that was overseen by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The host of the “The Next Revolution” told his viewers that there is reason to believe that SARS Covid-2—which is now widely believed to have leaked from the Wuhan Lab—is the “product of genetic experiments commissioned and funded by our own government.”
Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been an influential advocate of a very controversial type of research called “Gain of Function” virus research.
The research “aims to take a virus and then manipulate its genetic code to make it stronger and more contagious. The virus would gain new functions, hence the name,” Hilton explained. “The thinking goes, if we could engineer the most deadly viruses ourselves in lab conditions, we could better prepare for our pandemic response.”
Hilton pointed out that the research has been highly controversial throughout the scientific community since it began about ten years ago because it carries the very real risk that the genetically engineered virus could “get loose.”
“So in July of 2014, a group of scientists from around the world came together to voice their concerns,” Hilton said.
The concerned scientists formed the Cambridge Working Group, which sought “to coordinate efforts to enhance public understanding of the biosafety risks of such research, appropriate scrutiny and evaluation of its purported scientific and public health benefits, and appropriate regulation of such experiments that emphasize the use of safer approaches to met the same public health and scientific goals.”
Over 450 concerned scientists signed a Cambridge Working Group “Consensus Statement on the Creation of Potential Pandemic Pathogens,” which included the following warning:
Just before the 2014 ban, however, the Fauci-led NIAID funded the Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab, Hilton alleged, adding that NIAID continued to fund it for six more years, three of those during the ban.
The funding, according to Hilton, was laundered through a global health and pandemic prevention nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Dr. Peter Daszak, a British zoologist and expert on disease ecology.
Daszak subcontracted the research to Dr Shi Zhengli, head of the infectious disease unit at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Daszak, it should be noted, was behind an early effort to label any reporting on the possibility that COVID-19 could have accidentally escaped from the Wuhan lab as “conspiracy theories.”
The scientist orchestrated a statement that was published in The Lancet medical journal in February of 2020, condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggest the virus doesn’t have a natural origin.
The statement was cited by numerous news outlets — and by fact check organizations to censor investigative reporting on the true origin of the COVID-19 virus.
Nearly a year later, Daszak admitted through a spokesman that he shot down these inquiries to protect Chinese scientists from online criticism.
“The Lancet letter was written during a time in which Chinese scientists were receiving death threats and the letter was intended as a showing of support for them as they were caught between important work trying to stop an outbreak and the crush of online harassment,” Daszak’s spokesman told The Wall Street Journal in January.
Hilton reported that a November 2017 progress report signed by Daszak and Zhengli, among others, and titled, “Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus,” is tied to the grant, and seems to describe Gain of Function research.
“They made new viruses—man-made—in the lab. They infected human cells with them in the lab. And they then showed that their man-made viruses could replicate as a functional virus,” Hilton explained.
Hilton pointed out that SARS Covid-2 is 96 percent identical to the bat coronavirus the researchers were working on in the Wuhan Lab.
Hilton went on to say that he reached out to members of the Cambridge Research Group for comment, and has received dozens of replies back.
Some told him that they didn’t believe NIAID’s research at the Wuhan lab started out as Gain of Function research, but several scientists counseled him to reach out to D. Richard Ebright of Rutgers University for more insight because “he’s the global expert on all of this.”
The host said Ebright told him that the original grant did not include the Gain of Function research, but “the project’s renewal in 2019 unequivocally did include Gain of Function research of concern … and should have been flagged for review.”
Hilton invited Fauci to appear on his show to debunk anything he may have gotten wrong.
“Next week we’re going to ask you to respond directly to the new information we’ve reported tonight—that in 2019, you funded risky Gain of Function research involving bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Hilton said, stressing that “our own government” had warned that such research had serious bio-safety issues.
“The more we look into this, the more it looks like we’re right—that you commissioned genetic experiments that led to the creation of SARS Covid-2, the pandemic virus, in a lab,” Hilton concluded.
– – –
Debra Heine reports for American Greatness.
https://tennesseestar.com/2021/03/0...ents-commissioned-and-funded-by-faucis-niaid/
Fox News host Steve Hilton on Sunday shared the latest shocking findings from his months-long investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, alleging that the virus links back to U.S. commissioned research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that was overseen by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The host of the “The Next Revolution” told his viewers that there is reason to believe that SARS Covid-2—which is now widely believed to have leaked from the Wuhan Lab—is the “product of genetic experiments commissioned and funded by our own government.”
Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been an influential advocate of a very controversial type of research called “Gain of Function” virus research.
The research “aims to take a virus and then manipulate its genetic code to make it stronger and more contagious. The virus would gain new functions, hence the name,” Hilton explained. “The thinking goes, if we could engineer the most deadly viruses ourselves in lab conditions, we could better prepare for our pandemic response.”
Hilton pointed out that the research has been highly controversial throughout the scientific community since it began about ten years ago because it carries the very real risk that the genetically engineered virus could “get loose.”
“So in July of 2014, a group of scientists from around the world came together to voice their concerns,” Hilton said.
The concerned scientists formed the Cambridge Working Group, which sought “to coordinate efforts to enhance public understanding of the biosafety risks of such research, appropriate scrutiny and evaluation of its purported scientific and public health benefits, and appropriate regulation of such experiments that emphasize the use of safer approaches to met the same public health and scientific goals.”
Over 450 concerned scientists signed a Cambridge Working Group “Consensus Statement on the Creation of Potential Pandemic Pathogens,” which included the following warning:
Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks. An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world’s population within two years.
For any experiment, the expected net benefits should outweigh the risks. Experiments involving the creation of potential pandemic pathogens should be curtailed until there has been a quantitative, objective and credible assessment of the risks, potential benefits, and opportunities for risk mitigation, as well as comparison against safer experimental approaches. A modern version of the Asilomar process, which engaged scientists in proposing rules to manage research on recombinant DNA, could be a starting point to identify the best approaches to achieve the global public health goals of defeating pandemic disease and assuring the highest level of safety. Whenever possible, safer approaches should be pursued in preference to any approach that risks an accidental pandemic.
Following a number of “bio-safety incidents” at federal research facilities, the Obama administration placed a moratorium on Gain of Function research, Hilton noted, but the moratorium was lifted in 2017.For any experiment, the expected net benefits should outweigh the risks. Experiments involving the creation of potential pandemic pathogens should be curtailed until there has been a quantitative, objective and credible assessment of the risks, potential benefits, and opportunities for risk mitigation, as well as comparison against safer experimental approaches. A modern version of the Asilomar process, which engaged scientists in proposing rules to manage research on recombinant DNA, could be a starting point to identify the best approaches to achieve the global public health goals of defeating pandemic disease and assuring the highest level of safety. Whenever possible, safer approaches should be pursued in preference to any approach that risks an accidental pandemic.
Just before the 2014 ban, however, the Fauci-led NIAID funded the Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab, Hilton alleged, adding that NIAID continued to fund it for six more years, three of those during the ban.
The funding, according to Hilton, was laundered through a global health and pandemic prevention nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Dr. Peter Daszak, a British zoologist and expert on disease ecology.
Daszak subcontracted the research to Dr Shi Zhengli, head of the infectious disease unit at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Daszak, it should be noted, was behind an early effort to label any reporting on the possibility that COVID-19 could have accidentally escaped from the Wuhan lab as “conspiracy theories.”
The scientist orchestrated a statement that was published in The Lancet medical journal in February of 2020, condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggest the virus doesn’t have a natural origin.
The statement was cited by numerous news outlets — and by fact check organizations to censor investigative reporting on the true origin of the COVID-19 virus.
Nearly a year later, Daszak admitted through a spokesman that he shot down these inquiries to protect Chinese scientists from online criticism.
“The Lancet letter was written during a time in which Chinese scientists were receiving death threats and the letter was intended as a showing of support for them as they were caught between important work trying to stop an outbreak and the crush of online harassment,” Daszak’s spokesman told The Wall Street Journal in January.
Hilton reported that a November 2017 progress report signed by Daszak and Zhengli, among others, and titled, “Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus,” is tied to the grant, and seems to describe Gain of Function research.
“They made new viruses—man-made—in the lab. They infected human cells with them in the lab. And they then showed that their man-made viruses could replicate as a functional virus,” Hilton explained.
Hilton pointed out that SARS Covid-2 is 96 percent identical to the bat coronavirus the researchers were working on in the Wuhan Lab.
The only difference between that virus and the pandemic virus is how contagious it is. The pandemic virus, as we know, can be passed human-to-human. The original virus could not. And that four percent genetic difference between them is in exactly the places where Gain of Function techniques would be used to make the virus more contagious.
So while we can blame the Chinese regime for allowing the virus to leak, and especially for the cover-up afterwards, the terrifying truth may be that our own government commissioned the experiments that led to the creation of the pandemic virus in the first place.
Hilton said he has contacted the NIAID repeatedly to ask about the 2014 grant, and they have always replied that the grant in question was not for Gain of Function research, and thus not subject to the Obama administration ban.So while we can blame the Chinese regime for allowing the virus to leak, and especially for the cover-up afterwards, the terrifying truth may be that our own government commissioned the experiments that led to the creation of the pandemic virus in the first place.
Hilton went on to say that he reached out to members of the Cambridge Research Group for comment, and has received dozens of replies back.
Some told him that they didn’t believe NIAID’s research at the Wuhan lab started out as Gain of Function research, but several scientists counseled him to reach out to D. Richard Ebright of Rutgers University for more insight because “he’s the global expert on all of this.”
The host said Ebright told him that the original grant did not include the Gain of Function research, but “the project’s renewal in 2019 unequivocally did include Gain of Function research of concern … and should have been flagged for review.”
Hilton invited Fauci to appear on his show to debunk anything he may have gotten wrong.
“Next week we’re going to ask you to respond directly to the new information we’ve reported tonight—that in 2019, you funded risky Gain of Function research involving bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Hilton said, stressing that “our own government” had warned that such research had serious bio-safety issues.
“The more we look into this, the more it looks like we’re right—that you commissioned genetic experiments that led to the creation of SARS Covid-2, the pandemic virus, in a lab,” Hilton concluded.
– – –
Debra Heine reports for American Greatness.
https://tennesseestar.com/2021/03/0...ents-commissioned-and-funded-by-faucis-niaid/
Now that we know that the combination of Ivermectin/HCQ and zinc would stop viral replication you have to ask yourself how effective this new 'discovery' is on other viruses. I'm sure big pharma already knows but refused to tell us.
We had to find out for ourselves and still they're fighting us tooth and nail. What secrets are they trying so hard to protect and keep covered up? How many suffered and died who didn't have too because a cure was known but kept secret? How many families of those who needlessly suffered and died won't take it too well?
I read somewhere that if the 'vaccine' kills you
Health/life insurance doesn't have to 'pay out' a death benefit because you took an experimental drug.
Health/life insurance doesn't have to 'pay out' a death benefit because you took an experimental drug.
They aren't really hiding it. It says right on the national institue of health's website that experiments have shown that hcq and quercetin help to inhibit virus replication. If I recall correctly, they've been shown to inhibit influenza h1n1, h3n2, and rhinovirus'. If they show effects against at least two different types of virus', odds are fair to good that they'll inhibit other types too.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 6,178
That's a really good point!
I think they're counting on the general public not reading NIH literature. The information on the NIH site is amazing, as in cancer remedies, lifespan extending compounds, and other stuff the average drug-distributing MD will never tell you about.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,956
- Reaction score
- 2,314
Just curious , but what does the NIH say about cancer? My SIL is currently going though Chemo.
and why have they knowingly kept it from the peoples of the world?
Or like the Husband Wife murdered - he manufactured HCQ.
Or the HCQ factories that mysteriously blew up...
Or ... fill in the blank
FWIW
Trump Recommends Death Sentence for “Fraudulent Fauci”
Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:45
Donald J. Trump on Monday leveled his sharpest criticism yet at Deep State Dr. Anthony Fauci, saying in a letter to Republican governors that “fraudulent Fauci” should face the death penalty for “great crimes against the American people and their president,” said a Mar-a-Lago source familiar with Trump’s missions to expose the Deep State cabal and unseat Joseph Biden.
Trump wrote the letter, our source said, in response to Fauci’s most recent appearances on Sunday morning news broadcasts, where he attacked Govs. Greg Abbott (R-TX) and Tate Reeves (R-MS) for rescinding statewide mask mandates. Fauci also took an unprovoked swipe at Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, saying “rowdy and unlawful” spring-breakers threatened to spark a fresh surge of Covid-19 infections.
“He [DeSantis] will have to answer for the next super-spreader. Florida should close its beaches until 90% of the state is fully vaccinated,” Fauci told CNN’s Jake Tapper.
Sources familiar with Trump’s efforts to dethrone the illegitimate president and imprison his co-conspirators told RRN that Trump has a sealed indictment on the Deep State doctor, but Fauci’s political prominence has kept Trump from simply scooping him up for a trip to Guantanamo Bay.
“Fauci is staying in the limelight to protect himself. He knows his days are numbered, but right now he’s counting on Biden’s protection. It won’t last forever. Trump has thick skin. He doesn’t care if someone makes nasty comments about him. But go after his friends, those loyal to him, and that’s a different story entirely,” one source said.
Fauci has a troubling history of attacking politicians who disagree with his imaginary science and quackery—a pattern that began shortly after he joined Trump’s Covid-19 Task Force. When Trump asked why heart attack deaths and gunshot fatalities were added to the Covid-19 case fatality rate, Fauci said the virus was a contributing factor, a blatant lie.
“At every opportunity, Fauci used the media to undermine Trump and attack him. Trump put up with Fauci’s nonsense for a long time before putting him in a corner like a misbehaving child. When Trump returns to power and opens the indictment, the full breadth of Fauci’s treachery will be made public,” our source said.
Treason and mass medical malpractice are just two of the charges Fauci must answer for, and Trump holds Fauci personally responsible for the deaths of thousands—hundreds of thousands—of great Americans, he added. Fauci’s see-sawing on the merits of mask wearing and social distancing early in the plandemic caused needless fatalities.
“It would be fitting he get the death penalty himself, but I’ll let a military tribunal decide his fate,” Trump wrote in his letter to loyal Republican governors.
In closing, our source said Trump is counting on the support of Red State governors like DeSantis and Abbott, as well as dependable House Reps. And Congressmen, to rise to the occasion at the appointed hour, when Fauci’s—and many other Deep State operatives—crimes will be laid bare.
Trump Recommends Death Sentence for “Fraudulent Fauci”
Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:45
Donald J. Trump on Monday leveled his sharpest criticism yet at Deep State Dr. Anthony Fauci, saying in a letter to Republican governors that “fraudulent Fauci” should face the death penalty for “great crimes against the American people and their president,” said a Mar-a-Lago source familiar with Trump’s missions to expose the Deep State cabal and unseat Joseph Biden.
Trump wrote the letter, our source said, in response to Fauci’s most recent appearances on Sunday morning news broadcasts, where he attacked Govs. Greg Abbott (R-TX) and Tate Reeves (R-MS) for rescinding statewide mask mandates. Fauci also took an unprovoked swipe at Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, saying “rowdy and unlawful” spring-breakers threatened to spark a fresh surge of Covid-19 infections.
“He [DeSantis] will have to answer for the next super-spreader. Florida should close its beaches until 90% of the state is fully vaccinated,” Fauci told CNN’s Jake Tapper.
Sources familiar with Trump’s efforts to dethrone the illegitimate president and imprison his co-conspirators told RRN that Trump has a sealed indictment on the Deep State doctor, but Fauci’s political prominence has kept Trump from simply scooping him up for a trip to Guantanamo Bay.
“Fauci is staying in the limelight to protect himself. He knows his days are numbered, but right now he’s counting on Biden’s protection. It won’t last forever. Trump has thick skin. He doesn’t care if someone makes nasty comments about him. But go after his friends, those loyal to him, and that’s a different story entirely,” one source said.
Fauci has a troubling history of attacking politicians who disagree with his imaginary science and quackery—a pattern that began shortly after he joined Trump’s Covid-19 Task Force. When Trump asked why heart attack deaths and gunshot fatalities were added to the Covid-19 case fatality rate, Fauci said the virus was a contributing factor, a blatant lie.
“At every opportunity, Fauci used the media to undermine Trump and attack him. Trump put up with Fauci’s nonsense for a long time before putting him in a corner like a misbehaving child. When Trump returns to power and opens the indictment, the full breadth of Fauci’s treachery will be made public,” our source said.
Treason and mass medical malpractice are just two of the charges Fauci must answer for, and Trump holds Fauci personally responsible for the deaths of thousands—hundreds of thousands—of great Americans, he added. Fauci’s see-sawing on the merits of mask wearing and social distancing early in the plandemic caused needless fatalities.
“It would be fitting he get the death penalty himself, but I’ll let a military tribunal decide his fate,” Trump wrote in his letter to loyal Republican governors.
In closing, our source said Trump is counting on the support of Red State governors like DeSantis and Abbott, as well as dependable House Reps. And Congressmen, to rise to the occasion at the appointed hour, when Fauci’s—and many other Deep State operatives—crimes will be laid bare.
At the beginning of all this, Fauci was just being honest about masks and their supposed usefulness. He already knew they don't really help, but then was told to get with the program.
Guy is making real headway on slime ball of the year
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
Press Release: Canadian Doctors Speaking Out
https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/post/press-release-canadian-doctors-speaking-out
https://rumble.com/veg3uf-canadian-doctors-speak-out.html
The CANADA HEALTH ALLIANCE is a non-profit collaboration of medical doctors, nurses, chiropractors, naturopaths, pharmacists, and other healthcare practitioners from across Canada whose common goal is to protect the rights of our patients to access the highest quality healthcare available, continued freedom of choice, and autonomy through informed consent.
Our goal is to halt the misuse of power by politicized public health “experts” currently being conveyed through damaging COVID-19 public health policies that are destroying Canadian society and the health of Canadians.
https://www.libertycoalitioncanada.com/post/press-release-canadian-doctors-speaking-out
https://rumble.com/veg3uf-canadian-doctors-speak-out.html
The CANADA HEALTH ALLIANCE is a non-profit collaboration of medical doctors, nurses, chiropractors, naturopaths, pharmacists, and other healthcare practitioners from across Canada whose common goal is to protect the rights of our patients to access the highest quality healthcare available, continued freedom of choice, and autonomy through informed consent.
Our goal is to halt the misuse of power by politicized public health “experts” currently being conveyed through damaging COVID-19 public health policies that are destroying Canadian society and the health of Canadians.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 6,178
There are lots of different things shown to have anti-cancer properties, but two that come to mind are sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) and fenbendazole (dog dewormer).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23288510/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30093705/
Someone describes the sodium bicarbonate dosage here.
https://www.ieyenews.com/baking-soda-molasses-protocol-may-cure-many-cancers/
I don't know about the ideal amount of fenbendazole, you'd have to do some research on that. Of course, I'm not giving advice. I'm just
commenting that if I had cancer myself, I would try both of these things along with taking lots of vitamins, especially C and D.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 14,454
- Reaction score
- 30,290
I think we called this about 11 months ago right here........ THIS IS WHY WE MUST SAVE THIS PLACE. Together we are a very strong force of information.
https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bgi-genomics-gates-foundation-collab/
Bill Gates Foundation Funded Genomics Firm ‘Mining’ DNA Data Through COVID Tests.
BGI Genomics—the Chinese Communist Party-linked genomics firm flagged by U.S. officials as “mining” the DNA of Americans—has collaborated extensively with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The National Pulse can reveal.
The company has recently come under fire following a 60 Minutes exposé on the company’s use of COVID-19 tests to “collect, store and exploit biometric information” on American citizens, according to former U.S. intelligence officials. What’s more, a recent Reuters article linked the firm to the Chinese Communist Party’s military.
In addition to the Obama administration enabling the firm to gain a foothold in the U.S., the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation played a critical role in BGI’s American expansion.
In September of 2012, the Microsoft founder’s foundation signed a “Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to form a collaboration on global health and agricultural development with the goal of achieving common objectives in health and agricultural development.”
The co-founder of BGI praised the agreement, celebrating the forthcoming “scientific breakthroughs in the areas of human, plant and animal genomics.” He also revealed that the collaborative efforts focused on sequencing genomes—the precise activity flagged for national security threats in the 60 Minutes segment:
“Having contributed to the Human Genome Project as well as sequencing the genomes of many critical plant and animal species and human diseases, including the initial sequencing of the rice genome as well as our involvement in the Rice 10,000 Genome Project, the 1,000 Plants and Animals Genome Project, the International 1,000 genomes project, the 1,000 Rare Diseases Project, the International Cancer Genome Project, Autism Genome 10K, among others, BGI looks forward to partnering with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in this significant collaboration to apply genomics research to benefit global human health.”
GATES & BGI CO-FOUNDER WANG JUN AT THE 2015 BOAO FORUM.
The memorandum predates Gates’s 2010 visit to BGI’s China-based headquarters, where he witnessed the company’s genetic sequencing operation as described by the Financial Times:
In 2010, Bill Gates visited an unremarkable building in an industrial estate on the outskirts of Shenzhen, China. With row after row of high-tech machinery humming inside, the place could easily be mistaken for an anonymous data warehouse. But Mr Gates and Ray Yip, head of the Gates Foundation’s China operation, saw something else that day. As they toured the BGI headquarters, the two men were stunned by the ambition of the scientists working at the biotech company. Inside, more than 150 state of the art genetic sequencing machines were analysing the equivalent of thousands of human genomes a day. The company is working towards a goal of building a huge library based on the DNA of many millions of people. BGI executives see this not as the end-game, but as the springboard for new drug discoveries, advanced genetic research and a transformation of public health policy.
Yip praised the endeavor as “out-of-the-box,” “open,” and “liberal”:
“We were taken aback. We never thought we would find such an out-of-the-box approach. They are in their own league — open and liberal. Most people only see them as a service provider for DNA analysis. It is the database they are building that will make them formidable.”
The Gates Foundation has also funded BGI projects relating to genome sequencing alongside Chinese Communist Party bodies such as the Ministry of Science and Technology and Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Similarly, Dr. Tadataka Yamada, the former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.
GATES AND BGI RESEARCHERS.
And in 2016, BGI launched a U.S.-based office in Washington—the home state of Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BGI’s ties to Washington also appear to have influenced the firm’s decision to target the state with its COVID-19 test kits, part of the company’s plot to “mine” the data of Americans.
“Early last March, the state of Washington was the site of the first major coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. As COVID rates and the need for tests were spiking, BGI Group, the world’s largest biotech firm—a global giant based in China—approached the state of Washington with an enticing offer. In a strikingly personal letter to the governor, BGI proposed to build and help run state-of-the-art COVID testing labs,” 60 Minutes summarized.
But officials ultimately turned down the offer at the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence over BGI’s ties to the Chinese government.
https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/bgi-genomics-gates-foundation-collab/
Bill Gates Foundation Funded Genomics Firm ‘Mining’ DNA Data Through COVID Tests.
BGI Genomics—the Chinese Communist Party-linked genomics firm flagged by U.S. officials as “mining” the DNA of Americans—has collaborated extensively with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The National Pulse can reveal.
The company has recently come under fire following a 60 Minutes exposé on the company’s use of COVID-19 tests to “collect, store and exploit biometric information” on American citizens, according to former U.S. intelligence officials. What’s more, a recent Reuters article linked the firm to the Chinese Communist Party’s military.
In addition to the Obama administration enabling the firm to gain a foothold in the U.S., the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation played a critical role in BGI’s American expansion.
In September of 2012, the Microsoft founder’s foundation signed a “Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to form a collaboration on global health and agricultural development with the goal of achieving common objectives in health and agricultural development.”
The co-founder of BGI praised the agreement, celebrating the forthcoming “scientific breakthroughs in the areas of human, plant and animal genomics.” He also revealed that the collaborative efforts focused on sequencing genomes—the precise activity flagged for national security threats in the 60 Minutes segment:
“Having contributed to the Human Genome Project as well as sequencing the genomes of many critical plant and animal species and human diseases, including the initial sequencing of the rice genome as well as our involvement in the Rice 10,000 Genome Project, the 1,000 Plants and Animals Genome Project, the International 1,000 genomes project, the 1,000 Rare Diseases Project, the International Cancer Genome Project, Autism Genome 10K, among others, BGI looks forward to partnering with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in this significant collaboration to apply genomics research to benefit global human health.”
The memorandum predates Gates’s 2010 visit to BGI’s China-based headquarters, where he witnessed the company’s genetic sequencing operation as described by the Financial Times:
In 2010, Bill Gates visited an unremarkable building in an industrial estate on the outskirts of Shenzhen, China. With row after row of high-tech machinery humming inside, the place could easily be mistaken for an anonymous data warehouse. But Mr Gates and Ray Yip, head of the Gates Foundation’s China operation, saw something else that day. As they toured the BGI headquarters, the two men were stunned by the ambition of the scientists working at the biotech company. Inside, more than 150 state of the art genetic sequencing machines were analysing the equivalent of thousands of human genomes a day. The company is working towards a goal of building a huge library based on the DNA of many millions of people. BGI executives see this not as the end-game, but as the springboard for new drug discoveries, advanced genetic research and a transformation of public health policy.
Yip praised the endeavor as “out-of-the-box,” “open,” and “liberal”:
“We were taken aback. We never thought we would find such an out-of-the-box approach. They are in their own league — open and liberal. Most people only see them as a service provider for DNA analysis. It is the database they are building that will make them formidable.”
The Gates Foundation has also funded BGI projects relating to genome sequencing alongside Chinese Communist Party bodies such as the Ministry of Science and Technology and Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Similarly, Dr. Tadataka Yamada, the former president of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health program, serves as the Chairman of BGI’s Scientific Advisory Board.
And in 2016, BGI launched a U.S.-based office in Washington—the home state of Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
BGI’s ties to Washington also appear to have influenced the firm’s decision to target the state with its COVID-19 test kits, part of the company’s plot to “mine” the data of Americans.
“Early last March, the state of Washington was the site of the first major coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. As COVID rates and the need for tests were spiking, BGI Group, the world’s largest biotech firm—a global giant based in China—approached the state of Washington with an enticing offer. In a strikingly personal letter to the governor, BGI proposed to build and help run state-of-the-art COVID testing labs,” 60 Minutes summarized.
But officials ultimately turned down the offer at the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence over BGI’s ties to the Chinese government.
same here..we add coconut oil and peppermint essential oil
if my stomach gets some heartburn issues I go straight for the baking soda and water
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
03/10/21
•
BIG PHARMA › NEWS
39-Year-Old Woman Dies 4 Days After Second Moderna Vaccine, Autopsy Ordered
Kassidi Kurill’s family said she had no known medical issues or pre-existing conditions, but her heart, liver and kidneys shut down after her second dose of the Moderna vaccine.
By
Megan Redshaw
A 39-year-old woman from Ogden, Utah, died Feb. 5, four days after receiving a second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine, according to CBS affiliate KUTV.
Kassidi Kurill died of organ failure after her liver, heart and kidneys shut down. She had no known medical issues or pre-existing conditions, family members said.
•
BIG PHARMA › NEWS
39-Year-Old Woman Dies 4 Days After Second Moderna Vaccine, Autopsy Ordered
Kassidi Kurill’s family said she had no known medical issues or pre-existing conditions, but her heart, liver and kidneys shut down after her second dose of the Moderna vaccine.
By
Megan Redshaw
A 39-year-old woman from Ogden, Utah, died Feb. 5, four days after receiving a second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine, according to CBS affiliate KUTV.
Kassidi Kurill died of organ failure after her liver, heart and kidneys shut down. She had no known medical issues or pre-existing conditions, family members said.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 13,815
- Reaction score
- 17,749
quoath the Head Communist in charge of the local teachers union.............at the IMS mass inoculation..............
Your defining moment will be a helicopter ride
everyone needs to watch this video!
A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE!
Friday, March 12, 2021
video
https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2021/03/a-coming-covid-catastrophe-3744703.html
A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE!
Friday, March 12, 2021
video
https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2021/03/a-coming-covid-catastrophe-3744703.html
Last edited:
A hint of things to come. The businesses choosing to do this will hasten their own demise. What type of business plan excludes wide swathes of the public from their customer base and expects to flourish?
All this will do is attract sheep and commies. We'll see how long that drags out for before this place, and others like it, get crucified in social media then go belly up.
All this will do is attract sheep and commies. We'll see how long that drags out for before this place, and others like it, get crucified in social media then go belly up.
Just did. Makes a lot of sense.
You need to spray paint over the CDC. But yea, any business owner putting that sign out is an absolute moron, and I have no desire to ever step foot in there.
It doesn't matter how much they lie to try and stretch the truth, they've already committed suicide. Wait and we'll see them all crying in the streets because their businesses were boycotted (It's always someone else's fault with these leftist drones when they come upon hard times)
What frustrates me the most is the words/videos always makes sense these days. The actions and events are what has me reeling
What's going to happen...what's happening right now are very different than what it seems we hear and see from the internet soothsayers.
Last edited:
We really need to put their idiocy on display. The Best move would be ideally to have a restaurant next door put out a sign with the Opposite. IE. IF you have chosen to be poisoned with any mRNA or Covid vaccine you are NOT allowed in my restaurant.
WOW! Great post!
I'll bet we see that happen more then a few times now. It's going to be dog eat dog out there courtesy of the Covid Protection wing of the US Federal, state and local governments thinning the herd with their lockdowns.
It's gonna be bloody