- Oct 23, 2012
- Reaction score
I respectfully disagree, bad data is WORSE than no data IMHO. It most always leads to faulty assumptions
You are 1000% correct.
Partial/bad data is completely worthless. Absolute garbage. But that’s the point of it - - to intentionally mislead and promote an agenda.
What are the ages of the “victims”?
What was the health of the “victims”?
A 95yr old is just as likely to die from the common cold as they are from coronavirus.
Same for someone with emphysema. Or cancer. Or aids.