• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Dan Patrick interview with Tucker Carlson LIED ABOUT BY LIBERAL TALKING HEADS

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#1
Apparently folks on this forum are taking LIBERALS at face value.
https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...he-elderly-should-die-for-the-economy.356074/

One minute of Dan Patrick interview and the OTHER FIVE minutes a RANT against Patrick by a member of 'REBELHQ' what ever the hell that is.

Here is another liberal that does play one part of the interview - then proceeds to claim this is all about 'RICH TEXANS' say theat their slaves or employees don't come back to work the RICH TEXANS WILL LOSE MONEY - all I can say about this idiot is WOW what a maroon

Stictly the interview - he says 'we don't want to sacrifice the whole country because of this virus'. He also said he was turning 70 this year and he has six grand children and he would sacrifice HIS LIFE for his children and grand children.

Do you have children and grand children? Wouldn't you sacrifice your life for your children and grand children?

Most would. THAT IS ALL HE SAID. The liberals twist it so they say Patrick said he wanted to KILL GRANDMA. SORRY, BUT HE SPECIFICALLY DID NOT SAY THAT.
 
Last edited:

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#2
Apparently folks on this forum are taking LIBERALS at face value.
https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...he-elderly-should-die-for-the-economy.356074/

One minute of Dan Patrick interview and the OTHER FIVE minutes a RANT against Patrick by a member of 'REBELHQ' what ever the hell that is.

Stictly the interview - he says 'we don't want to sacrifice the whole country because of this virus'. He also said he was turning 70 this year and he has six grand children and he would sacrifice HIS LIFE for his children and grand children.

Do you have children and grand children? Wouldn't you sacrifice your life for your children and grand children?

Most would. THAT IS ALL HE SAID. The liberals twist it so they say Patrick said he wanted to KILL GRANDMA. SORRY, BUT HE SPECIFICALLY DID NOT SAY THAT.
It's the liberals who want to kill grandma. Patrick should have used another analogy. The bottom line is he used poor judgement and pissed off both conservatives and liberals. All politicians know how to do is talk, shake hands and kiss babies! Beyond that they add little to no value to the country.
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#3
YOU POST WHERE HE SAID WHAT YOU ARE SAYING
HE NEVER SAID IT - and just because some crazed LIBERALS don't want to tell the truth about it, and you saying he should have said it a different way? There is NOTHING the liberals won't twist to make a point on something that he DID NOT SAY.

You are REPEATING what LIBERALS INTERPRET WHAT HE SAID that is a lie.

Shootist, you live in TEXAS, right? And you've met Patrick on more than one occasion, right? I HAVE.

He is nothing that YOU and the liberals claim...
 

Mujahideen

Essential Worker
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
12,104
Likes
22,855
Location
Wakanda
#4
I think some people are simple enough that they go all in on the headlines without actually listening to what is said.
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#5
YOU POST WHERE HE SAID WHAT YOU ARE SAYING
HE NEVER SAID IT - and just because some crazed LIBERALS don't want to tell the truth about it, and you saying he should have said it a different way? There is NOTHING the liberals won't twist to make a point on something that he DID NOT SAY.

You are REPEATING what LIBERALS INTERPRET WHAT HE SAID that is a lie.

Shootist, you live in TEXAS, right? And you've met Patrick on more than one occasion, right? I HAVE.

He is nothing that YOU and the liberals claim...
Let's try this again...

"Patrick should have used another analogy. The bottom line is he used poor judgement and pissed off both conservatives and liberals."
 

Uncle

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
2,061
Likes
2,673
Location
SA
#6
Lost in translation.

Golden Regards
Uncle
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#7
Like I said, CONSERVATIVES will NEVER say anything that LIBERALS/SOCIALISTSCOMMUNISTS will EVER agree with.

And no, he did NOT piss off ANY conservatives, because we understand the fact that regardless of what Patrick or any conservative says, a liberal will be pissed about it and lie about what a conservative says.

What part of that did you not understand? And UNCLE, no it's NOT lost in translation. This is simply someone trying to placate liberals by taking what they say and trying to BLAME a conservative for something HE DID NOT SAY.

still have not seen SHOOTIST ADMIT HE NEVER SAID THAT. I won't give an inch until he does. Because he is trying to get you ALL to think like a liberal and agree with them.

NOT ME
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#8
Like I said, CONSERVATIVES will NEVER say anything that LIBERALS/SOCIALISTS/COMMUNISTS will EVER agree with.

And no, he did NOT piss of ANY conservatives, because we understand the fact that regardless of what Patrick or any conservative says, a liberal will be pissed about it and lie about what a conservative says.

What part of that did you not understand?
He pissed me off and I'm a conservative. He simply added fuel to the fire. I watched the entire interview twice! He didn't need to go there yet he chose to go the drama route.
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#9
He pissed me off and I'm a conservative. He simply added fuel to the fire. I watched the entire interview twice! He didn't need to go there yet he chose to go the drama route.
If you are a conservative and you are AGREEING WITH A LYING LIBERAL, and then saying that it's PATRICK'S FAULT for the lying liberals saying the lies about what he said.

That would be like me claiming that because you are repeating LIBERAL LIES you must believe them. But I do not, because I KNOW you don't want to see the destruction of our country. Unlike all the liberals who are ALL CONVINCED if their leaders could 'control' all of us OR JUST KILL US.

That is the difference me and any liberal you want to repeat their lies for. GET IT?

I personally doubt it. Other wise you would not use a LIARS words and attribute them to a person who spoke the truth.

YOU STILL REFUSE TO ADMIT PATRICK NEVER SAID WHAT LIBERALS AND YOU CLAIM HE SAID.

We can't go any further until you at least admit the truth.
 
Last edited:

Traderjoe

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
176
Likes
286
#10
It's time people crawl out from under their beds and start living again. The economy shutting down is the problem, not the virus. If I die from the virus, at least I wasn't a pussy and I died with my freedoms.
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#11
If you are a conservative and you are AGREEING WITH A LYING LIBERAL, and then saying that it's PATRICK'S FAULT for the lying liberals saying the lies about what he said.

That would be like ME CALLING YOU A LYING LIBERAL simply because you
I didn't say any of that. Admittedly the thread title is click bait but Patrick still pissed me off because he threw more fuel into the fire. He should not of even went there! There are many other ways to say the country needs to go back to work without suggesting seniors risk their lives to support it. That simply isn't necessary!
 
Last edited:

Uncle

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
2,061
Likes
2,673
Location
SA
#12
Like I said, CONSERVATIVES will NEVER say anything that LIBERALS/SOCIALISTSCOMMUNISTS will EVER agree with.

And no, he did NOT piss off ANY conservatives, because we understand the fact that regardless of what Patrick or any conservative says, a liberal will be pissed about it and lie about what a conservative says.

What part of that did you not understand? And UNCLE, no it's NOT lost in translation. This is simply someone trying to placate liberals by taking what they say and trying to BLAME a conservative for something HE DID NOT SAY.

still have not seen SHOOTIST ADMIT HE NEVER SAID THAT. I won't give an inch until he does. Because he is trying to get you ALL to think like a liberal and agree with them.

NOT ME
OK. I watched the interview only after commenting because I couldn't make head or arse about the comments Yes, you are right wallew, a storm in a teacup about morals, the Gov will give his life for his grandchildren, and I also agree that BB title is click-bait.

Golden Regards
Uncle
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#13
I didn't say any of that.
Really? You did not say?

He should oft himself and make it safer for the rest of us. At least this guy should immediately resign!

That is even worse that what I claimed.

And you NEVER answered the other question - do you have children and grandchildren? Would you give your life for them and for their safety in the future?

So, yes or no?

Personally the wife and I don't have any children. Patrick will be three years older than I am this year. But if we did have children/grandchildren, I'm right with Patrick, I would give anything for their well being in the future and you don't like that? Because that IS what he said. THE LIBERALS HATE THAT.
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#14
Really? You did not say?

He should oft himself and make it safer for the rest of us. At least this guy should immediately resign!

That is even worse that what I claimed.
Yeah, then I actually watched the entire video and changed my stance. I didn't delete my original post. Perhaps I should have.
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#15
Thank you. Here you go - this might help a little.


Raging Against Self Defense:
A psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality



"You don’t need to have a gun; the police will protect you."
"If people carry guns, there will be murders over parking spaces and neighborhood basketball games."
"I’m a pacifist. Enlightened, spiritually aware people shouldn’t own guns."
"I’d rather be raped than have some redneck militia type try to rescue me."

How often have you heard these statements from misguided advocates of victim disarmament, or even woefully uninformed relatives and neighbors? Why do people cling so tightly to these beliefs, in the face of incontrovertible evidence that they are wrong? Why do they get so furiously angry when gun owners point out that their arguments are factually and logically incorrect? How can you communicate with these people who seem to be out of touch with reality and rational thought? One approach to help you deal with anti-gun people is to understand their psychological processes. Once you understand why these people behave so irrationally, you can communicate more effectively with them.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is what this is all about. Personally I doubt you have read this, because if you had, you would not say the things you are saying RIGHT NOW.

this is a really long read

learn something new today

http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#16
Thank you. Here you go - this might help a little.


Raging Against Self Defense:
A psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality



"You don’t need to have a gun; the police will protect you."
"If people carry guns, there will be murders over parking spaces and neighborhood basketball games."
"I’m a pacifist. Enlightened, spiritually aware people shouldn’t own guns."
"I’d rather be raped than have some redneck militia type try to rescue me."

How often have you heard these statements from misguided advocates of victim disarmament, or even woefully uninformed relatives and neighbors? Why do people cling so tightly to these beliefs, in the face of incontrovertible evidence that they are wrong? Why do they get so furiously angry when gun owners point out that their arguments are factually and logically incorrect? How can you communicate with these people who seem to be out of touch with reality and rational thought? One approach to help you deal with anti-gun people is to understand their psychological processes. Once you understand why these people behave so irrationally, you can communicate more effectively with them.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is what this is all about. Personally I doubt you have read this, because if you had, you would not say the things you are saying RIGHT NOW.

this is a really long read

learn something new today

http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm
Yeah but I as a senior with 7 grandkids doesn't see what this topic has to do with giving up my life for my grandchildren. Moreover, I don't see how my grandchildren are better off if Papa is dead as a tradeoff for the stores being reopened a couple of weeks sooner than they might be.

What he said was all drama dripping bullshit! He could have made his point of finding a happy medium between total lock down and reopening some commerce without all the drama he recklessly through our there (which of course the libs picked right up on and weaponized). If he's your bud sorry if I'm offending you but; I submit that you have a lesson to learn too...there's no such thing as a caring and trusted politician!
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#17
You DID NOT EVEN READ ANYTHING PAST WHAT I POSTED HERE ON THIS THREAD.

Why do I say that?

Because this was written BY A WOMAN - Sarah Thompson, MD (psychiatrist), which you would have known if you had looked at it and it's not bull shit. It's a carefully worded, extremely specific explanations of why liberals are so disturbed and WHY they blame everyone else but themselves for ALL their problems. Inner reflection is not something they are about. The handy scape goat, as long as it's not THEM? THAT they are ALL about.

And I KNEW you would never read it. SO I actually hosted it here on GIM - but you still won't read it. It's too much work. No such thing as a caring and trusted politicians?

there are, but you can't recognize them these days BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF HONESTY BY LIBERALS AND THE MSM

https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...trist-examines-the-anti-gun-mentality.356127/

Seven grands? From how many children? Those are the PEOPLE YOU MUST LOVE AND CARE FOR. The rest is but dust. And the fact that you DON'T SEE IT? You should read that article all the way through. Nothing worse than not knowing what is about to happen. YOU DO NOT.
 
Last edited:

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#18
For everyone else

If you DON'T know where this is going

GO WATCH "THE RELIANT" - it's a tough watch because they address what happens when a family trusts their children at the wrong time. it is a deadly decision that was made
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#19
You DID NOT EVEN READ ANYTHING PAST WHAT I POSTED HERE ON THIS THREAD.

Why do I say that?

Because this was written BY A WOMAN - Sarah Thompson, MD (psychiatrist), which you would have known if you had looked at it and it's not bull shit. It's a carefully worded, extremely specific explanations of why liberals are so disturbed and WHY they blame everyone else but themselves for ALL their problems. Inner reflection is not something they are about. The handy scape goat, as long as it's not THEM? THAT they are ALL about.

And I KNEW you would never read it. SO I actually hosted it here on GIM - but you still won't read it. It's too much work. No such thing as a caring and trusted politicians?

there are, but you can't recognize them these days BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF HONESTY BY LIBERALS AND THE MSM

https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...trist-examines-the-anti-gun-mentality.356127/

Seven grands? From how many children? Those are the PEOPLE YOU MUST LOVE AND CARE FOR. The rest is but dust. And the fact that you DON'T SEE IT? You should read that article all the way through. Nothing worse than not knowing what is about to happen. YOU DO NOT.
It appears you're right, I can't keep up with you here. My apologies
 

tigerwillow1

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
1,026
Likes
1,734
#20
I think you have to be in heavy spin mode to be pissed or offended by what he said. For starters, he made it clear that this is his personal opinion: "I don't pretend to be speaking for everybody 70 plus".

He's weighing the increased risk of papa being dead vs. "potentially collapse our society", "no jobs to come back to", and "whole country sacrificed". He says he personally accepts increased risk if it can save his grandkids from a cure that's worse than the disease. It's a point of view. Maybe it's right, maybe it's wrong, but certainly a valid point of view to consider. He won't be making the decision. He's throwing his opinion into the discussion. Triage at the hospital is making the same sort of decisions at the individual level. He's looking at it from the society level. There's no assurance we'll make the right society-level decisions, but dismissing, suppressing, or attacking perfectly valid ideas increases the odds of doing it wrong.
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
42,396
Likes
67,856
#21
I think you have to be in heavy spin mode to be pissed or offended by what he said. For starters, he made it clear that this is his personal opinion: "I don't pretend to be speaking for everybody 70 plus".

He's weighing the increased risk of papa being dead vs. "potentially collapse our society", "no jobs to come back to", and "whole country sacrificed". He says he personally accepts increased risk if it can save his grandkids from a cure that's worse than the disease. It's a point of view. Maybe it's right, maybe it's wrong, but certainly a valid point of view to consider. He won't be making the decision. He's throwing his opinion into the discussion. Triage at the hospital is making the same sort of decisions at the individual level. He's looking at it from the society level. There's no assurance we'll make the right society-level decisions, but dismissing, suppressing, or attacking perfectly valid ideas increases the odds of doing it wrong.
Thanks, I'm really done with this topic tho. Way too much drama for me
 

wallew

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,689
Likes
1,731
Location
Texas, USA, North America, Planet Earth
#22
WOW, so long as YOU ARE COMFORTABLE lying about what people say and then put your opinion ABOVE THE PERSON YOU ARE CRITICIZING? That put's your opinion above the person that you LIED ABOUT. And then say "It's way too much drama for you"?

You are the one who when you finally looked at it you REVERSED YOURSELF and then admitted you were wrong. So when I posted a link that IF YOU HAD ACTUALLY READ IT you might have had an idea of how to deal with liberal liars. But all you did was attack what I said, attack Dan Patrick for saying what he said by saying:

What he said was all drama dripping bullshit!

That says tons about you and is a complete misnomer on Patrick.

You love to give your opinion, and then get pissed off when I read what you said and pointed out you did not watch what Patrick said (you admitted you had not and REVERSED your self once you actually watched him) and then you admitted did not read what I posted about WHY LIBERALS LIE (about gun control, but they LIE ABOUT EVERY THING).

So kindly tell me why it is so much drama to you when you did not watch at first and NEVER read what I posted.

Wow so sensitive about a video you did not watch and an article you did not read. I suspect you have liberal leanings, which is why you DON'T LIKE TO HAVE OTHER PEOPLE EDUCATE YOU.

And I'll ask again. IF GIVEN A CHOICE OF YOU DYING AND YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDS SURVIVE AND THRIVE YOU WOULD INSTEAD CHOOSE TO LIVE AND JUST LET THEM DIE? Because that is exactly what Dan Patrick said he would gladly sacrifice his life so his FAMILY could survive and thrive. But apparently you would not?

SO now I'm confused. You would not do what Dan Patrick said HE would do for his family. I feel sorry for your family. You put yourself above your family?

Not me. And JUST FOR THE RECORD - for the past four years my wife and I have been caring for my (now 92) Mom. We cared for my FIL, my MIL and my DAD before they passed. We are doing the same for my Mom.

As I said, we don't HAVE any children. SO we care for the family WE DO HAVE. Maybe it's just a TEXAN thing?
 
Last edited: