• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Election 2016: Long Term Vision of Globalists Materializes As Resistance Grows

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
73,083
Likes
34,633
#1
Election 2016: Long Term Vision of Globalists Materializes as Resistance Grows




August 18, 2016

Old-Thinker News | August 18, 2016

By Daniel Taylor

Economist magazine claims: “The future of the liberal world order depends on whether she [Hillary Clinton] succeeds,” while blaming patriots and anti-globalists for causing crises across the globe.


During the 2014 riots in Ferguson, Missouri Old-Thinker News reported that “The establishment is attempting to direct the spirit of the nation into a destructive revolution of bloody conflagration and hate that will only result in more power for the elite. If the nation is allowed to unify over issues of sound economic policy, purging government corruption, and re-affirming our moral code as a nation and as individuals, the corrupt elite will be brought to justice. As long as the country is divided this cannot happen.”

In the two years after Ferguson, the establishment has attempted to divide the nation even further along racial, sexual identity and “social justice” issues.

The real issue of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election is the divide between globalism and nationalism; Globalists Vs. anti-globalists. It is the same issue facing millions across the globe as the United Kingdom recently voted to exit the European Union. The elite have known that resistance to their plans for the world is building to a critical mass. It is for this reason that deliberate attempts are being made to divert this energy into divisive issues, causing a destructive revolution that will give more power to the elite.

Make no mistake; as the world becomes more chaotic, establishment propaganda will blame nationalists, patriot groups, Trump supporters and others for causing it. The Economist magazine recently blamed anti-globalists for the rising crises engulfing the EU. The article concludes by stating that “The future of the liberal world order depends on whether she [Hillary Clinton] succeeds.”

Council on Foreign Relations member James Traub called for elites to rise up against nationalists who are an example of how “extremism has gone mainstream”. Paul Joseph Watson writes,

“Traub’s tone is so contemptuous, he even describes the pro-Trump Republican base as “know nothing” voters and sneers at voters in Poland for being concerned about “values and tradition,” while stressing that the push for further globalization will pit “poor and non-white and marginal citizens” against “working-class and middle-class whites,” whom he describes as angry “fist-shakers”.”

In reality, globalist policies have created or exacerbated the crises we are now witnessing.

Globalists have had a long term plan for breaking down borders and deliberately creating societal chaos. The Rockefeller foundation spearheaded globalist initiatives for decades in America, but George Soros’ foundations are now leading the way. Illegal immigration is being used as a battering ram to complete these objectives, a problem which is largely driven by globalist backed wars and policies of international bankers.

Long term plans come to fruition

Hacked documents from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation demonstrate the deliberate effort to use illegal immigration as a tool of forced globalization. The report states that the immigration crisis presents an opportunity to expand the organizations operations and influence nation’s policies. The report says, “As our aspirations have evolved, our targets have shifted from harm reduction to more proactive solutions-based policy influencing.”

The document continues, “The current climate presents new opportunities for reforming migration governance at the global level, whether through the existing multi-lateral system, or by bringing together a range of actors to think more innovatively.”

While George Soros is presently leading globalist initiatives, plans for using illegal immigration to further globalization go back decades, and emanate from multiple foundations.

A 2010 report from the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense stated that by 2040 a “global society” will emerge, plagued with tensions brought about by globalization. The report says that “sustained international migration” will “drive the development of a global culture…” Because of the increased migration, tensions will inevitably emerge. “Intrusive global culture” will threaten traditional customs and beliefs and “possibly radicalize” certain groups.

The document also seems to describe groups like George Soros’ Open Society Foundation by “predicting” “…the emergence of a global elite, a powerful network of individuals and institutions that sits above the level of individual states and influences the global agenda.”

On June 11, 2002 a conference on North American integration was held by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The center, which influences policy making in Washington, is funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, The Gates Foundation and George Soros. During the 2002 meeting, shocking revelations were made regarding the elite’s plans to create a North American Union between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In order to accomplish this, representatives from various think tanks agreed that a campaign of social engineering needed to re-shape beliefs about national sovereignty and identity.

Bruce Stokes, Council on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow, National Journal columnist and Chatham House member told the conference that a true “North American Community” would only be “…forged in the heat of conflict, not through a rational discussion, as painful as that may be. It really cannot happen any other way.”

As early as the 1970′s, the World Order Models Project, financed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Rockefeller foundation, proposed “strategies of transition” into a new global era. Saul H. Mendlovitz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, directed the project. Richard A. Falk, also a member of the CFR, contributed academic work.

The goals of the WOMP were to, “…go beyond the nation-state system…to use a much broader range of potential actors, including world institutions, transnational actors, international organization, functional activities, regional arrangements…”

The project sought to use world leaders like the Pope to promote the globalists agenda. Richard Falk wrote,

“Symbolic world leaders such as the Secretary General of the United Nations or the Pope might espouse [the WOMP agenda]… as a program for the future… These kinds of external developments… would initiate a world order dialectic within American politics that would begin to break down decades of adherence to [the Westphalian system] and its infrastructure of values, perceptions and institutions.”

Pope Francis recently called for a “New humanity” to embrace a globalist ideology that “refuses to see borders as barriers.”

The establishment is sowing seeds of discord across the world and presenting solutions that work in its favor. In response, we need to continue pointing out the man behind the curtain, rather than falling into divisive traps. Hillary Clinton’s failing health is a timely representation of the failing establishment. Political science professor Helmut Norpoth is predicting that Donald Trump has an 87% chance of winning the 2016 election.

http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2016/...-globalists-materializes-as-resistance-grows/
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
73,083
Likes
34,633
#3
How The Global Elites Screw Peons (While Media Fools Cheer)


by Tyler Durden
Aug 18, 2016 8:14 AM

Submitted by Michael Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Do the Merkels and Junckers of the world give a rat’s ass about the problems they cause?

Did Bush or Cheney give a rat’s ass about the mass slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq?

Does Obama care about all the innocent victims of the US’s unconstitutional drone policy?

The answer to those questions is easy. But why? The short answer is neither the global elite nor their families are ever in a position to be damaged by their own actions.

As a result, those in power see people at the bottom as aliens whose bizarre emotions they must try to manage.



Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan discusses this setup in her column How Global Elites Forsake Their Countrymen.

Recently I spoke with an acquaintance of Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and the conversation quickly turned, as conversations about Ms. Merkel now always do, to her decisions on immigration.

The acquaintance said, he believed the chancellor was operating in pursuit of ideals. Moreover she is attempting to provide a kind of counter-statement, in the 21st century, to Germany’s great sin of the 20th. The historical stain of Nazism, the murder and abuse of the minority, will be followed by the moral triumph of open arms toward the dispossessed. That’s what’s driving it, said the acquaintance.

It was as good an explanation as I’d heard. But there was a fundamental problem with the decision that you can see rippling now throughout the West. Ms. Merkel had put the entire burden of a huge cultural change not on herself and those like her but on regular people who live closer to the edge, who do not have the resources to meet the burden, who have no particular protection or money or connections. Ms. Merkel, her cabinet and government, the media and cultural apparatus that lauded her decision were not in the least affected by it and likely never would be.

Nothing in their lives will get worse. The challenge of integrating different cultures, negotiating daily tensions, dealing with crime and extremism and fearfulness on the street—that was put on those with comparatively little, whom I’ve called the unprotected.

The powerful show no particular sign of worrying about any of this. When the working and middle class pushed back in shocked indignation, the people on top called them “xenophobic,” “narrow-minded,” “racist.” The detached, who made the decisions and bore none of the costs, got to be called “humanist,” “compassionate,” and “hero of human rights.”

In Manhattan, my little island off the continent, I see the children of the global business elite marry each other and settle in London or New York or Mumbai. They send their children to the same schools and are alert to all class markers. And those elites, of Mumbai and Manhattan, do not often identify with, or see a connection to or an obligation toward, the rough, struggling people who live at the bottom in their countries. In fact, they fear them, and often devise ways, when home, of not having their wealth and worldly success fully noticed.

I close with a story that I haven’t seen in the mainstream press. This week the Daily Caller’s Peter Hasson reported that recent Syrian refugees being resettled in Virginia, were sent to the state’s poorest communities. Data from the State Department showed that almost all Virginia’s refugees since October “have been placed in towns with lower incomes and higher poverty rates, hours away from the wealthy suburbs outside of Washington, D.C.” Of 121 refugees, 112 were placed in communities at least 100 miles from the nation’s capital. The suburban counties of Fairfax, Loudoun and Arlington—among the wealthiest in the nation, and home to high concentrations of those who create, and populate, government and the media—have received only nine refugees.

Some of the detachment isn’t unconscious. Some of it is sheer and clever self-protection. At least on some level they can take care of their own.

Arrogantly Ass Backwards

One of the most disgusting and arrogant articles I have seen in a long time was written by James Traub, a contributing editor at Foreign Policy.

This ignorant (to use his own word) fool (my word but not nearly strong enough) says It’s Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against the Ignorant Masses.

The Brexit has laid bare the political schism of our time. It’s not about the left vs. the right; it’s about the sane vs. the mindlessly angry,” says Traub.

Who the hell is Traub to decide what is right for the masses?

The masses were against the Iraq war (and correctly so). We had war anyway, with devastating consequences.

The masses never would have fought a war with Vietnam. We had a war, and we lost it. How many US citizens are dead, physically disabled, or mentally disabled because the elite so much believed in the asinine “Domino Theory” that they were willing to go into a stupid war on that belief?

Traub is upset that the masses have finally figured out the global elite don’t give a rat’s ass about them.

Mindlessly Angry?

People are not “mindlessly angry”. They are angry because they have been ripped off by the Fed, by their governments, and by ignorant media jackasses who are clueless about why there is so much anger.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-18/how-global-elites-screw-peons-while-media-fools-cheer
 

searcher

Mother Lode Found
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
73,083
Likes
34,633
#4
Kike Soro's black lives matter group is supposed to have a rally in the Hamptons this weekend where a bunch, A BUNCH of rich Jews live.
I hear there may be some party crashers at the shindig. Could be a festive happening.