• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

FedEx almost collides with Chemtrailing KC-135 on Video

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#1
 
Last edited by a moderator:

newmisty

Duppy Conqueror
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
10,408
Likes
10,389
Location
Omerica
#2
subscribed...
 

Bigfoot

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
2,740
Likes
2,731
#3
The claims/ "conclusions" reached by the person editing the video are incorrect.

1. Fact: The aircraft passing overhead had sufficient separation, see below.

2. Fact: There is nothing to suggest ATC was unaware of the aircraft passing overhead.

3. Fact: None of the aircraft said to be "spraying" in the video can be confirmed as KC-135 tankers. The plane being filmed flying in the latter half of the video is clearly a 747. The author then recklessly throws in a couple of KC-135 pictures at the end, which fools those who are unfamiliar with identifying aircraft.

Above 29,000 feet (8,800 m), no aircraft shall come closer than 600 m (or 2,000 feet), except in airspace where Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) can be applied.

In areas where RVSM capabilities exist, 1,000 feet of vertical separation may be utilized up to FL410.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_(air_traffic_control)
 
Last edited:

EO 11110

He Hate Me
Mother Lode
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
12,524
Likes
8,651
#5
that first video has some of the best closeup footage i've seen :thumbs_up:
 

tyrannyfree

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
51
Likes
7
#6
B...B...B...B...But Bigfoot there is no such thing as jets laying down chemtrails. Try to stay with the main point.

Now go collect your small check.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
7,243
Likes
8,208
Location
South Floriduh
#7
The claims/ "conclusions" reached by the person editing the video are incorrect.

1. Fact: The aircraft passing overhead had sufficient separation, see below.

2. Fact: There is nothing to suggest ATC was unaware of the aircraft passing overhead.

3. Fact: None of the aircraft said to be "spraying" in the video can be confirmed as KC-135 tankers. The plane being filmed flying in the latter half of the video is clearly a 747. The author then recklessly throws in a couple of KC-135 pictures at the end, which fools those who are unfamiliar with identifying aircraft.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_(air_traffic_control)
I had EXTREME trouble watching that utterly egregious (for those from CA: that means, LYING) pile of crap.

The above -- very civil -- better than I could do -- debunking is spot on.

Presentations like that video are made for naive*** people with a predisposition to tinfoil hat bullsh!t.

ODD PEOPLE FLY EAST

For the naive (that's nice for IGNORANT***) people buying it, I will do my very best to explain one more time to the tinfoil hats:

The vertical separation was perfectly normal. Happens hundreds of times daily. The fargin idiot stupid mythical dumb-azz, jerk-off...

ooop, sorry...

The "Chemtrails" (Grrrrr. lemme start over...) (again)

The "chemtrails" are ice crystals.

At 30,000 feet, EVERY FARGIN AERIOPLANE OF ANY FARGIN DESCRIPTION (that would include jets, props, rockets, and someone standing and p!ssing out of the side window of a B-17 over Germany) WILL ALWAYS LEAVE (***ahem***) "chemtrails" <-- composed of water ice.

The ONLY people on earth who are unaware of this fact are those who want a conspiracy at any cost without consideration as to their acceptance as rational human beings. In a nutshell, that includes a couple of these types right here.

Starting to grind my teeth again. Sorry. Reset.

OK... "ODD PEOPLE FLY EAST" <-- If you are the pilot, you WILL choose an altitude based on where you are going relative to the direction known as EAST.

This is a fargin LAW. <-- Break it, and your license is suspended. Got that?

So if you are at (about) 30,000 feet, and if you are on any heading from 1 degree to 179 degrees, you are heading "east". So you fly an...

...ODD ALTITUDE. 31,000 feet. or 29,000 feet.

The there is MARSA. Military Accepts Responsibility for Separation of Altitude <-- If you fly (as a pilot) you will see MARSA a lot. They have YOU on their avoidance radar, and are handling it.

If this concept is difficult for anyone here to comprehend, then let me shout hosannahs to the FAA for not letting that "anyone" be a pilot. It is a question on the test that -- if answered incorrectly -- will get your azz grounded. Clear?

To fill in for those who make me crazy and LEAP to the conspiracy side... I will continue:

If you are at (about) 30,000 feet, and you are flying on a heading of 181 degrees to 359 degrees...

...which way are you heading?

What altitudes are yours to choose?





If you answered: "West" and you answered: "28,00 feet, or 30,000 feet or 32,000 feet"...

BINGO! You can watch the K-tankers, 747's, and UFO's go by you with a MINIMUM of 1009feet vertical separation. MARSA can be as little as 100 feet.

If you MISSED the right answers, you belong in the idiot chemtrail brigade.



Guys... that is my best shot at being civil. :s9: It is really a bloody strain to not shout. :vollkommenauf:




LATE PS EDIT: All chemtrail conspirators should try to get a Pilot's License. Either they will learn reality, or they will not get their license.
 
Last edited:

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#8
Unca Walt, what's your explanation of why some contrails last only a few minutes (like they all did 20 years ago) and others last hours?
 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,082
Likes
6,065
#10
Thanks unca for being civil.

For most small aircraft flying outside controlled airspace in good weather, the pilots are responsible for maintaining a safe distance from other aircraft. This is the "see and be seen" principle otherwise known as VFR or Visual Flight Rules. In this mode of operation, a pilot must keep a continual watch for other aircraft in the sky. When flying above 3,000 feet above ground level (AGL), the pilot must follow VFR cruising altitudes given below (or east/west cruising altitudes).

  • Flying a magnetic course of 0° - 179°, fly at odd thousands plus 500 feet. For example, 3,500; 5,500; 7,500.
  • Flying a magnetic course of 18° - 359°, fly at even thousands plus 500 feet. For example, 4,500; 6,500; 8,500.
For jetliners flying inside controlled airspace, pilots are still responsible for maintaining a safe distance from other aircraft. They also must strictly follow IFR or Instrument Flight Rules. In this mode of operation, pilots are flying under reduced visibility and must depend on their instruments for additional guidance and information. Though rules of separation vary depending on the airspace in which a jetliner is flying, in general, air traffic controllers and pilots are required to maintain a horizontal distance of 5 nautical miles between 2 aircraft flying at the same altitude. For altitudes at and below 29,000 feet, vertical separation must be maintained at a minimum 1,000 feet. For altitudes above 29,000 feet vertical separation must be maintained at a minimum of 2,000 feet.
http://virtualskies.arc.nasa.gov/navigation/10.html

Just an earthbound misfit, I.
 

917601

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
11,297
Likes
9,295
#11
Just had another training class ( about my 5 th one in 5 years) on TCAS and the new reduced vertical separation limits, for the Chemtrailers crowd, pretend you never heard these terms, it might enlighten you.Uncle Walt is correct.Certain individuals here deserve to stay in the dark.
 

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#12
Just had another training class ( about my 5 th one in 5 years) on TCAS and the new reduced vertical separation limits, for the Chemtrailers crowd, pretend you never heard these terms, it might enlighten you.Uncle Walt is correct.Certain individuals here deserve to stay in the dark.
I see you can't answer the question I asked Walt either.

917601, what's your explanation of why some contrails last only a few minutes (like they all did 20 years ago) and others last hours? .
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
7,243
Likes
8,208
Location
South Floriduh
#13
Unca Walt, what's your explanation of why some contrails last only a few minutes (like they all did 20 years ago) and others last hours?

MY explanation?

Why mine? Why not use the Weather peoples'?



Depending on wind, altitude, time of day, time of year, amount of water in the air, type of engine on the plane, and about six other variables... contrails can last for mere seconds, or slowly s-p-r-e-a-d out over a period of hours.

With all stages in between.

Wind
Altitude of aircraft
time of day
amount of water in the air
type of engine for the plane

That oughta be enough variables for you to intuitively get the picture that contrails can vary all over the lot.


WHOA!!

I just saw this:

"I see you can't answer the question I asked Walt either."


"Either"!!??

"Can't answer"!!??

Who TF said I cannot answer????

How about giving Walt a frigging minute to do so, eh?

I don't actually LIVE here at GIM, and after having explained the FACTS from the POV of someone who HAS the facts (that would be any pilot on this planet)... and having gone to some considerable length to explain it clearly and in a way that anyone not brain damaged or unable to process simple concepts would be able to understand thoroughly...

...I went out to do some shooting, confident that this lying, depending-upon-ignorance-for-acceptance bullsh!t video had been shown to be the lying, depending-upon-ignorance-for-acceptance bullsh!t video that it is.

I come back in, and someone is pleased to remain wearing their Impenetrable Cloak Of Ignorance.

Everyone reading this thread now has the facts.

ANYONE who cannot process them has concrete in their heads.
 
Last edited:

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#14
MY explanation?

Why mine? Why not use the Weather peoples'?



Depending on wind, altitude, time of day, time of year, amount of water in the air, type of engine on the plane, and about six other variables... contrails can last for mere seconds, or slowly s-p-r-e-a-d out over a period of hours.

With all stages in between.

Wind
Altitude of aircraft
time of day
amount of water in the air
type of engine for the plane

That oughta be enough variables for you to intuitively get the picture that contrails can vary all over the lot.
A lot of us are old enough to remember that up until 20 years ago, "contrails" did not last more than 20 minutes or so. Only since then have we seen these trails that last for hours and hours. Which of those variables changed abruptly 20 years ago?
 

917601

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
11,297
Likes
9,295
#15
I see you can't answer the question I asked Walt either.

917601, what's your explanation of why some contrails last only a few minutes (like they all did 20 years ago) and others last hours? .
20 years ago the most common turbine engine was the JT8, today the CF6, PW2000, PW4000,etc...
Secondly, the altitude which varies in wide ranges of temperature due to jet stream, moisture, etc...all play a roll, even time of day....any aviator knows these elementary facts.As I have stated in prior posts modern jet fuel composition plays a part also, algicides, biocides, cut, uncut, wide cut fuels,the "culprit".Alleged "sampling" of sprayed areas revealed many ingredients of the most up to date fuels in use.In the past, I posted in very much depth, even went out of my way to a large aviation fuel farm here and posted the results, was declared an aviation know it all by some here so finally decided you chemtrail folks can stay in the dark and waste all your energy, time, fearing the imaginary boogeyman.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
7,243
Likes
8,208
Location
South Floriduh
#16
Crikey.

I wonder how many adherents I could get here if I claimed that the Tinker Bell fairy place has thousands of Tinker Bells, and they have all been kidnapped by Jewish FBI/Mossad/Fed agents because they found out that PIXIE DUST...

...makes PERFECT CHEMTRAILS! :party30::afraid::idea::cool1:

So since Walt Disney died, these gummint bastids have been spraying Pixie Dust from every airplane that they can affix several captive pixies to. Pixies can't prevent the dust from coming off, d'ysee.

That has as much scientific and hard data backing as the chemtrail conspiracy concept. Actually, it has considerably MORE proof:

You NEVER see any more pixies around, do you!!!

They are attached to all existing airplane wings. The leftover pixies are being kept in a vault in Fort Knox. <-- and I can prove that, too!!! NOBODY gets to see diddly in Fort Knox, do they!! HAH!!! They don't want you to find the New World Order Pixie Stash.

Those poor little Tinky Bells... Stuck on the wings of tens of thousands of planes. :cry_smile:
 

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#18
20 years ago the most common turbine engine was the JT8, today the CF6, PW2000, PW4000,etc...
Secondly, the altitude which varies in wide ranges of temperature due to jet stream, moisture, etc...all play a roll, even time of day....any aviator knows these elementary facts.As I have stated in prior posts modern jet fuel composition plays a part also, algicides, biocides, cut, uncut, wide cut fuels,the "culprit".Alleged "sampling" of sprayed areas revealed many ingredients of the most up to date fuels in use.In the past, I posted in very much depth, even went out of my way to a large aviation fuel farm here and posted the results, was declared an aviation know it all by some here so finally decided you chemtrail folks can stay in the dark and waste all your energy, time, fearing the imaginary boogeyman.
Different jet engines are not responsible for the changes we're discussing. I'm not buying it.
 

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#19
Crikey.

I wonder how many adherents I could get here if I claimed that the Tinker Bell fairy place has thousands of Tinker Bells, and they have all been kidnapped by Jewish FBI/Mossad/Fed agents because they found out that PIXIE DUST...

...makes PERFECT CHEMTRAILS! :party30::afraid::idea::cool1:

So since Walt Disney died, these gummint bastids have been spraying Pixie Dust from every airplane that they can affix several captive pixies to. Pixies can't prevent the dust from coming off, d'ysee.

That has as much scientific and hard data backing as the chemtrail conspiracy concept.

Those poor little Tinky Bells... Stuck on the wings of tens of thousands of planes. :cry_smile:
In other words you don't have an argument, just ridicule.

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
 

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#20
A lot of people are old enough for selective memory.
Are you asserting that we had contrails that lasted for hours back in the 70's and 80's?
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
7,243
Likes
8,208
Location
South Floriduh
#21
A lot of us are old enough to remember that up until 20 years ago, "contrails" did not last more than 20 minutes or so. Only since then have we seen these trails that last for hours and hours. Which of those variables changed abruptly 20 years ago?
I love it when someone makes a statement (fuvking WRONG) and then demands an explanation for it.

Jay-ZUS.

First: I am 72. And because I am a pilot, I am... what... fifteen hundred times more aware of what is going on in the air than you are? 'Bout that? More? Mebbe only a hundred times more aware?

Chemtrails over London in the Battle Of Britain lasted ALL FARKING DAY.

Show me where you got your WRONG data.

...I recommend the following: Get your DATA.

I say that the vapor trails of B-17's lasted as long as they did: Hours.

I say that vapor trails of modern day jets last ten minutes. Unless they last a coupla hours.



HOW LONG IS THIS "CHEMTRAIL" LASTING? Think:

Speed of the plane... length of the poison trail. Hmm... looks like mere seconds.



Depends on many, many variables.
 
Last edited:

honu5050

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
15,828
Likes
2,753
Location
wit;in reach
#22
Different jet engines are not responsible for the changes we're discussing. I'm not buying it.
you'll buy it and like it ! now pay them taxes..... that spraying is expensive !
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
7,243
Likes
8,208
Location
South Floriduh
#23
In other words you don't have an argument, just ridicule.

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
In other words, you were GIVEN the info, but you do not have the ability to see.

So I ridicule the stupidity and ignorance NECESSARY to omit from one's brain the information that dissipates one's hysterical hold on nonsense.

You got Schopenhauer bass-ackwards, son. You started with a wish/dream/hope/fantasy that you START as being self-evident.

...And then proceed to somehow ignore all real data to the contrary of your wish/dream/hope/fantasy.

Did you, or did you not see my explanation?

Do you understand the irony of my post about Tinker Bell and her sisters? It requires a complete withholding of all serious thinking to accept the Tinky Bell Theory.

It requires a complete withholding of all serious thinking to accept the chemtrail silliness.

Because even though it apparently makes you mentally writhe, you ARE aware now of just what the hell contrails are.

Meanwhile: tell me you now understand the OP video has been proven to be a stupidly, ignorantly... bullsh!t fear-mongering pile of poop. ('Cause you know THAT, now, also - don't you.)

I am done here.

Wrap your Cloak tightly, if you must.
 

RealJack

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,429
Likes
1,158
#24
You got to admit this would make perfect military strategic sense. Of course they're spraying.
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]WEATHER AS A FORCE MULTIPLIER: OWNING THE WEATHER IN 2025[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
MILITARY APPLICATIONS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION
[/FONT]
[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]
[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]In 2025 US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to warfighting applications. Such a capability offers the warfighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] A high risk/high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns, to complete dominance of global communications and counter-space control, weather modification offers the warfighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability: [/FONT][FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]WEATHER AS A FORCE MULTIPLIER: OWNING THE WEATHER IN 2025[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
MILITARY APPLICATIONS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION
[/FONT]
[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]
[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]In 2025 US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to warfighting applications. Such a capability offers the warfighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] A high risk/high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns, to complete dominance of global communications and counter-space control, weather modification offers the warfighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] Current technologies which will mature over the next thirty years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather modification ability into a capability. In the US, weather modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include: unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;" in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."[/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]
[/FONT] [FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]A RESEARCH PAPER PRESENTED TO AIR FORCE 2025[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release. [/FONT]

Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.
[/FONT]

[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] Current technologies which will mature over the next thirty years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather modification ability into a capability. In the US, weather modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include: unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. "The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;" in 2025 we can "Own the Weather."[/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]
[/FONT] [FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]A RESEARCH PAPER PRESENTED TO AIR FORCE 2025[/FONT]​
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL]2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only. [/FONT]
[FONT=VERDANA,ARIAL] This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release. [/FONT]
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
3,384
Likes
1,583
#25
I love it when someone makes a statement (fuvking WRONG) and then demands an explanation for it.

Jay-ZUS.

First: I am 72. And because I am a pilot, I am... what... fifteen hundred times more aware of what is going on in the air than you are? 'Bout that? More? Mebbe only a hundred times more aware?

Chemtrails over London in the Battle Of Britain lasted ALL FARKING DAY.

Show me where you got your WRONG data.

...I recommend the following: Get your DATA.

I say that the vapor trails of B-17's lasted as long as they did: Hours.

I say that vapor trails of modern day jets last ten minutes. Unless they last a coupla hours.



HOW LONG IS THIS "CHEMTRAIL" LASTING? Think:

Speed of the plane... length of the poison trail. Hmm... looks like mere seconds.



Depends on many, many variables.


Hey Walt, check it out, they were spraying "chemtrails" during the Battle of Britain !

 

Ebie

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,241
Likes
1,642
#26
The first contrail that I saw that went horizon to horizon was in approx 2002.
I had never seen that for 30 years before.
 

Alric

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
7,268
Likes
1,792
#27
The reason people probably see them more often now is because there are more planes and they probably weren't paying attention before. If you go about your daily business you probably don't notice the vast majority of the chemtrails because people rarely look at the sky and pay little attention to it, but if you think they are deadly poison suddenly you are going to notice every single one.
 

hoarder

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
10,275
Likes
9,405
Location
Montana
#28
Walt, what are pictures of chem/contrails supposed to prove? The issue is how long they linger. All you've managed to do in this thread is make a grand display of emotion.
 

EO 11110

He Hate Me
Mother Lode
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
12,524
Likes
8,651
#30
the deniers argument summed up in linear logic:

apple is red, so red is apple


f-ing morons can't consider that more than just contrails can be put in the atm?

they're not that dumb

they are crooked

know what you are dealing with here
 

Bigjon

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,352
Likes
2,221
#31
the deniers argument summed up in linear logic:

apple is red, so red is apple


f-ing morons can't consider that more than just contrails can be put in the atm?

they're not that dumb

they are crooked

know what you are dealing with here
The misinfo men from megaphone central
 

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,082
Likes
6,065
#32
Effing a right I'm crooked. I just love the hell out of twisted godless heathen evil schtuff.

Yes, and I am here to swear at Solomon (and affirm) that there are some wicked viscous chemtrails out there, on every aircraft since Icarus pissed himself when the wax started melting.

Dad tells the story.

Cargo 727 has fumes, sparks, smoke in the cockpit, declares a mayday and gets butt on ground. Upon further inspection we discover:

1) Blue Lavatory fluid about the cabin and cargo areas in various states of congeal

2) Soiled Pilot and copilot

3) A one time maintenance flight to atlanta for cannibalization/overhaul/scrap

It seams that hungry co-pilot really likes lunch and is always sporting a cooler chock full of culinary delights (they really should call them semi-pilots, only about half trained) decides that dry ice goes into the toilet. Vesuvius erupts spewing blue lavatory liquid in a desperate attempt by the holding tank to not build up to burst pressure. At that, the aircraft was successful.

As murphy would predict, however, the now reeking and leaking fluid is starting to short stuff out with sparks and smoke. where there is smoke, fire is sure to follow. With many prayers to god and Mr. Boeing the now earthbound aircraft is now kinda junk.


SO there is my real life chemtrail confession. Real. Life. Without a net.
 
Last edited:

Bigfoot

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
2,740
Likes
2,731
#33
Different jet engines are not responsible for the changes we're discussing. I'm not buying it.
Engines don't make a difference, eh?

Now read this very carefully. Let's see here, from page 226 of The Great Rat Race for Europe, Stories of the 357th Fighter Group:

"Later, I saw Messerschimitt 262s on one of our escort missions. I saw them purely as a "demonstration" though, as they were flying much higher and faster than we were, and fortunately made no passes at the bombers that day. I still remember the long contrails they left in the sky above us. The unusual contrails lingered much longer than the ones made by our bombers."

If you think I made that up, please Google it.

Walt, what are pictures of chem/contrails supposed to prove? The issue is how long they linger.
The pictures he posted prove that contrails can linger for a really long time, even in back in WWII. Those are slow flying B-17s. Well, they're not really that slow, but slow by today's standards, and the trails still stretch out of the picture.

Here's a question for you, Hoarder. Why is it that some days are sunny and some days have a few clouds, and some days are overcast, and some days are foggy? If you can answer that question, you'll be able to understand why some contrails last a long time and some last a short time.
 
Last edited:

Bigfoot

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
2,740
Likes
2,731
#34
Oh man, look at these secret "military tankers" spraying right on in to landing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
3,384
Likes
1,583
#35
for the newbies and the spectators --- this is one of the issues that tells you who's who and what's what on this board

Yes, we've always had those special people here at GIM and everyone knows how special you are.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
3,384
Likes
1,583
#37
Oh man, look at these secret "military tankers" spraying right on in to landing.


Holy grits, they carrying so much chemtrail pixie dust they have to start dumping it before the leave the runway !

That's it Bigfoot, I'm a truly true truth convert.

Hoarder, where to I sign up ? Tell Malus I want a t'shirt and coffee mug !
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DodgebyDave

Metal Messiah
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,082
Likes
6,065
#38
apparrrently they were laid down in checkerboard pattern back then too.
This goes back to at least the 60's. I remember the day I asked my daddy why the airplanes made clouds.
 

Fiat Metaler

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
1,876
Likes
813
#39
where i live, i started noticing long-lasting contrails about 8-10 years ago.

i live near some military bases, and i see the old fashioned quick-disappearing ones left by F-22s at altitude, but also the long lasting ones often set down often in checkerboard pattern or criss cross.

yes, different engines, altitude, etc will alter the contrail, but we are not talking about that. we are talking about long-lasting medium altitude contrails that tend to be concentrated in a specif area, often criss cross or checkerboard. I have seen these dozen of times where i live as well as occassionally the quick-disappearing contrails.

the point is, just because we have different engines now doesn't mean the contrails are going to last for 4 hours as opposed to about 5-20 minutes as in the 70s. and having them set down in a checkerboard pattern implies a design or intent, especially when ATC considerations are factored in.

posting a video of a plane in fog or other strawmen does not address the question. nor does posting a still photo from WWI, unless you can verify that it was taken 4 hours after those planes flew, becuase i have seen contrails in my sky 4+ hours after i saw the jets creating the contrails.
 

Bigfoot

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
2,740
Likes
2,731
#40
B...B...B...B...But Bigfoot there is no such thing as jets laying down chemtrails. Try to stay with the main point.
The main point is that the claims made in the video in the OP are fraudulent.

Now go collect your small check.
There are some here that think every time the dog that lives down the road barks in the middle of the night that it must be controlled opposition.