• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Flaw in the monetary system

Carl

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,883
Likes
2,824
Location
Texas
#1
 

Mujahideen

Essential Worker
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
12,403
Likes
23,883
Location
Wakanda
#2
End fractional reserve banking.
 

Carl

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,883
Likes
2,824
Location
Texas
#3

Mujahideen

Essential Worker
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
12,403
Likes
23,883
Location
Wakanda
#4
Well, that's just exactly what they're planning, with the banning of cash.
You can ban cash and still have fractional reserve banking.
 

Carl

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,883
Likes
2,824
Location
Texas
#5
If the monetary medium held as reserves is banned, and the credit placeholder for that monetary medium is 'monetized' by making it the de facto monetary 'unit of account', then banks would become, by default, 100% reserved, while effectively relieving the banks of their $13-Trillion cash dollar debt obligations to their depositors. Banning cash relieves banks of their reserve requirements, and gifts the banks a $13-Trillion Boon.

**A ban on cash is the effective dissolution of nation states and of sovereignty, both political and individual, in favor of an unaccountable banking elite who will effectively control the lives and livelihoods of all, including governments.
 
Last edited:

michael59

heads up-butts down
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
11,400
Likes
7,415
Location
on the low side of corporate Oregon
#6
K,
If the monetary medium held as reserves is banned
...d, and the credit placeholder for that monetary medium is 'monet...
so, the medium held as reserves? NO'f'n way, bud. There is no way they have held reserves....which by the way is what I think you are say'n.
so who is the credit placeholder of "a" account?

BY GOLLIE I think you are right; my bad...

Are you implying that this might be the re-set?

edit: got rid of a doublwoo
 

Mujahideen

Essential Worker
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
12,403
Likes
23,883
Location
Wakanda
#7
You can deposit money into a bank, and they can lend the majority of it out and only keep a fraction of the reserves.

Whether or not the reserves are physical cash, or some sort of digital currency that's loaded onto a card or whatever is a matter of semantics, IMO. But I digress.

The real problem that I see with the monetary system is the overuse of credit caused by fractional reserve banking and multiple deposit creation.

A single $100 deposit can turn into a million in a few steps. That clearly is fraudulent.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
52,563
Likes
98,826
Location
Rocky Mountains
#8
FullSizeRender.jpg
 

Joe King

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
10,947
Likes
12,955
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#9
Whether or not the reserves are physical cash, or some sort of digital currency that's loaded onto a card or whatever is a matter of semantics, IMO.
You would be correct. We are so far beyond the point of banks actually being able to hold their reserves in cash, it ain't funny.

Just the 15 biggest banks alone hold more than $11.5Trillion in deposits. For the reserves to be held in cash would require them to hold almost all the cash in existence.
...but there is only $1.47Trillion in cash total, and nearly half of that circulates offshore.

So there's no way possible that they hold anything close to all reserves in cash. Most all of it is just numbers on a computer screen and they hold just enough cash on a daily basis to supply the needs of their deposit holders asking for cash, which is but a drop in the bucket compared to reserve requirements.

In a nutshell, we already have a digital monetary system with a small number of physical notes to represent those dollars while you hold them outside the banking system. Ie: the cash in your wallet.
 

Carl

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,883
Likes
2,824
Location
Texas
#10
You can deposit money into a bank, and they can lend the majority of it out and only keep a fraction of the reserves.
Whether or not the reserves are physical cash, or some sort of digital currency that's loaded onto a card or whatever is a matter of semantics, IMO. But I digress.
The real problem that I see with the monetary system is the overuse of credit caused by fractional reserve banking and multiple deposit creation.
A single $100 deposit can turn into a million in a few steps. That clearly is fraudulent.
A single $100 legal tender deposit turns into $100 legal tender reserves for the bank, nothing else. It's not multiplied, it's not divided, it's not loaned, it's not borrowed, it just reserves held by the bank and it has absolutely nothing to do with banks generating credit as a deposit and calling that a 'loan'.

There are two types of reserves that banks utilize, 1) cash reserves held in vaults, and 2) reserve assets held at the Fed.

Cash Reserves:
Here are the 'Money Supply' facts: There is a total of $1.5-Trillion in U.S. legal tender dollars in circulation around the globe.
Of that, $280-Billion is in circulation within the U.S.
Of that, $74-Billion is held in bank vaults.
Of that $74-Billion, the Fed counts $64-Billion as 'Required Reserves' and $10-Billion as 'Excess Reserves'.
The 'required reserves' averages out to a 3% reserve ratio on demand deposits.

That $74-Billion held in bank vaults backs the $1.9-Trillion in credited demand deposit accounts. It also backs the $9.3-Trillion in credited savings accounts. It also backs all commercial credit transactions, from Main Street to Wall Street, and all points in between and beyond. It also backs all U.S.G. payments.

And that, is the reality of Fractionally Reserved Banking.

It has absolutely nothing to do with a bank's ability to generate credit as 'loans', and everything to do with a bank's ability to cover credited deposit account withdrawals.

Fed Held Reserves:
Reserve accounts held at the Fed are not legal tender FRNs, or 'cash', they are assets, primarily Treasuries, Agency Mortgage Backed Securities and Special Drawing Rights Certificates. These securities, held as reserves, are what the FOMC manipulates to achieve their erroneously labeled 'Monetary Policy'. The Fed's current balance of uncollateralized legal tender cash stands at $173-Billion. As per Paragraph 1, Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Fed is barred from using the legal tender FRNs for any purpose other than supplying demand for the notes, which is driven by depositor demand.
 

michael59

heads up-butts down
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
11,400
Likes
7,415
Location
on the low side of corporate Oregon
#11
I'm on ignore....or just singing the same tune which is getting canceled out by the wave function collapsing due to observation. and, who said quantum or wampum phisiks didn't apply?

They hold no wampum and I am supposed to believe they do? so for this orgy to continue I need to bring my own KY? (Not to be construed with Kentucky)