• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Get To Know Mayor Buttplug

Alton

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
6,128
Likes
12,175
Location
Michiana
#1
Alright, here's all the stuff of genuine importance to get to know the political roots and position of Mayor Buttplug. It's all links to articles that you have to read yourself. Just so you know, Pete Buttigieg is NO LONGER MAYOR of South Bend, Indiana. There is a new political parasite filling that role as mayor Peter is galivanting across the country working hard to deceive all.

Here's the links:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-professor-who-lauded-the-communist-manifesto

https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/17/national-security-mandarins-groomed-pete-buttigieg/

https://readsludge.com/2020/02/07/b...s-to-their-limits-at-dark-money-linked-event/

https://thegrayzone.com/2020/02/07/pete-buttigieg-cia-afghanistan/

https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/is-pete-buttigieg-the-israel-lobby-choice/

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/...tus-quo-arent-mutually-exclusive-f3262fbeecea

This should be sufficient to deeply inform readers of Mayor Buttplug. He's REALLY bad news and NO GOOD for America.
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,415
Likes
7,816
#3
Get to know him. No thanks.

His sexuality alone is too easily corruptible for a politician, that is, in a normal world.

The very fact that this man is a leading contender for elpresidente, while parading his homosexuality, is in of itself evidence of the breakdown of this nation...
 

<SLV>

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,686
Likes
6,509
#5
His sexual deviancy is less concerning to me than his platform.
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
10,070
Likes
12,847
Location
On a speck of dust
#6
Get to know him. No thanks.

His sexuality alone is too easily corruptible for a politician, that is, in a normal world.

The very fact that this man is a leading contender for elpresidente, while parading his homosexuality, is in of itself evidence of the breakdown of this nation...
It's politics, man. They're either giving it or getting it.
 

nickndfl

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
14,296
Likes
13,889
Location
Florida
#7
What's his winning platform? No tariffs on vaseline? Get back in the closet ya homo.
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,415
Likes
7,816
#8
If his platform is not significantly influenced by his sexual deviancy, than he would be a remarkable individual indeed. But I doubt it.
 

ZZZZZ

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
5,008
Likes
10,787
Location
Northern Arizona
#9
Imagine the holy jihad the Muslim terrorists would wage against the Great Satan if we had a homosexual president.
.
.
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,415
Likes
7,816
#10
^^^ Great point. And think of the possibilities for further disruption and discombobulation for this nation secondary to that issue.
 

BigJim#1-8

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,499
Likes
12,795
#11
His sexual deviancy is less concerning to me than his platform.
Yep, queer or not, his platform is just as insane as the rest of the dem/prog/soc/comm's.
 

the_shootist

Trump 2020
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
44,724
Likes
73,876
#12
Looks like they're setting things up for another Buttboy victory in NV. Reminds me of the same tactics which they used to get Obama lauched into the mainstream.

1581604404064.png
 

Merlin

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
2,886
Likes
4,000
#13
What's his winning platform? No tariffs on vaseline? Get back in the closet ya homo.
Those closeted gays are the ones whose homosexuality corrupts them. Isn't it better that he's open and honest about who he is?
 

Merlin

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
2,886
Likes
4,000
#15
It's a joke lighten up already
But I am serious. We're always hearing about some politician who has an anti-gay platform and then is caught with a little boy. That's what I'm talking about. I think it's great that Mayor Pete is open. I'm not voting for him, of course, because he's a Democrat.
 

<SLV>

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,686
Likes
6,509
#17
But I am serious. We're always hearing about some politician who has an anti-gay platform and then is caught with a little boy. That's what I'm talking about. I think it's great that Mayor Pete is open. I'm not voting for him, of course, because he's a Democrat.
Merlin, I appreciate your measured responses on GIM to matters regarding homosexuality. It shows a lot of maturity and grace. I think it is unfortunate that some here reduce your total identity to that one issue.

In reality, all of us are "closeted" about something. Every single human has transgressive desires -- desires for that which their family, friends, or even law enforcement disdains. It would be ridiculous to assume that any preacher of righteousness (religious or not) does not himself have desires contrary to that which he believes is right and good. It is common to the human condition - we are all hypocrites, and the best of us are the greatest hypocrites. It is the struggle we all face. It is that for which we attempt to discipline ourselves to forego, and as we mature we become more skillful in denying our base urges the transgressive pleasures they desire. And yet the desire remains.

Mocking Pete B. for his sexual choice is a complete distraction from what really matters. The same can be said of mocking AOC for her teeth. What is at stake here is the liberty of our Constitutional Republic. The danger is the acceptance that socialism is finding among the younger generation.

Those who value our Constitution are better off spending their time refuting the socialistic platforms of the liberal left than slinging derogatory nicknames and focusing on the tabloid fodder surrounding these socialists. Let's not be so shallow.

(The same could be said for those who boast about how they would "hit" Tulsi Gabbard or Sarah Palin, or whoever. Juvenile.)
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
10,070
Likes
12,847
Location
On a speck of dust
#18
But I am serious. We're always hearing about some politician who has an anti-gay platform and then is caught with a little boy. That's what I'm talking about. I think it's great that Mayor Pete is open. I'm not voting for him, of course, because he's a Democrat.
I know I've said this before but in politics, not all men that have sex with another man consider themselves homosexual.
 

EO 11110

CENSORSHIP KILLS
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
15,834
Likes
13,228
Location
clown world
#19
they say buttplug has a black voter problem. this shows that blacks are far more likely to be gay than whites are

1581690444709.png
 

Bigjon

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
3,940
Likes
3,615
#20
I just read some of the first article linked, where Butty lambasted Gabbard for meeting with that murderous dictator Assad.

Here is the alleged murderer driving, while being interviewed.

 
Last edited:

Merlin

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
2,886
Likes
4,000
#21

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,415
Likes
7,816
#23
In reality, all of us are "closeted" about something. Every single human has transgressive desires -- desires for that which their family, friends, or even law enforcement disdains.
This is true for many secondary to society today, but not all. Having these sexual desires and following through with them are two completely separate things. Just because I, or anyone may have a deviant sexual attraction doesn't mean that I will follow through on it. One is heaven and one is hell. One allows for the propagation of our species, and one destroys it. Yes that's simplistic, but there it is.

It would be ridiculous to assume that any preacher of righteousness (religious or not) does not himself have desires contrary to that which he believes is right and good. It is common to the human condition - we are all hypocrites, and the best of us are the greatest hypocrites.
Wrong. It's only hypocritical to include us all. It is not common to the human condition except in times such as today, at the dusk of this civilization. It is certainly not true of all, and all this crazy sexuality has been let loose in this world specifically to destroy us. Stable societies do not allow sexuality adverse to the propagation of our species to be primary roles, very minor roles that don't influence society perhaps. but we're no longer stable sexually, are we.

And if we allow this kind of representation of us what does that say about us.

Mocking Pete B. for his sexual choice is a complete distraction from what really matters. The same can be said of mocking AOC for her teeth.
Neither would be even considered for political leadership role in a normal stable society. Why does that not matter to you?

The danger is the acceptance that socialism is finding among the younger generation.
Very true. But such imbecibility is propagated by first loosening sexuality and racial hatred in the population to entitlement.

Let's not be so shallow.
Please explain how not wanting leaders who throw their sexual deviancy in our faces is wrong.

I've always enjoyed Merlins POV and participation on this forum, but I would never consider or allow him my political leader.
 
Last edited:

<SLV>

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,686
Likes
6,509
#24
This is true for many secondary to society today, but not all. Having these sexual desires and following through with them are two completely separate things. Just because I, or anyone may have a deviant sexual attraction doesn't mean that I will follow through on it. One is heaven and one is hell. One allows for the propagation of our species, and one destroys it. Yes that's simplistic, but there it is.



Wrong. It's only hypocritical to include us all. It is not common to the human condition except in times such as today, at the dusk of this civilization. It is certainly not true of all, and all this crazy sexuality has been let loose in this world specifically to destroy us. Stable societies do not allow sexuality adverse to the propagation of our species to be primary roles, very minor roles that don't influence society perhaps. but we're no longer stable sexually, are we.

And if we allow this kind of representation of us what does that say about us.



Neither would be even considered for political leadership role in a normal stable society. Why does that not matter to you?



Very true. But such imbecibility is propagated by first loosening sexuality and racial hatred in the population to entitlement.



Please explain how not wanting leaders who throw their sexual deviancy in our faces is wrong.

I've always enjoyed Merlins POV and participation on this forum, but I would never consider or allow him my political leader.
You missed the point. I wasn't speaking only of transgressive sexual desires, but desires in general to do things which would be denounced by our family, friends, or society as a whole. If this makes a person a hypocrite, then we are all hypocrites because we all have desires to cross those boundaries. It is the law, or the disapproval of those we admire, which keeps us from acting on our transgressive desires.
 

arminius

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
5,415
Likes
7,816
#25
You missed the point. I wasn't speaking only of transgressive sexual desires, but desires in general to do things which would be denounced by our family, friends, or society as a whole. If this makes a person a hypocrite, then we are all hypocrites because we all have desires to cross those boundaries. It is the law, or the disapproval of those we admire, which keeps us from acting on our transgressive desires.

And you missed my point. Our desires are created by the society and culture we live in, but no sane normal human culture has 100% rate (all of us) of wanting to act on crossing societal boundaries, or even 25%. The great majority want to live in peace and harmony to create and build and live peaceably, and successful societies are ones with longevity much greater than those taken down by foreign sources for the benefit of a few. There is a small <5% of populations that aren't sane within that culture. We have a few on this forum.

It seems like we woke up one day to find that, out of nowhere, distinguishing between male and female has become illegal. -Eric Striker

There are pressures in this society these days that are abnormal, transgressive or otherwise. It is not normal for society to have and implement desires that destroy the society. That comes from outside forces that seek to conquer a nation or society for their profit...
 

newmisty

Splodey-Headed
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
29,752
Likes
45,145
Location
Qmerica
#26