• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

In 420-0 vote, House says Mueller report should be public

Scorpio

Скорпион
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
27,350
Likes
34,140
#1
In 420-0 vote, House says Mueller report should be public

MARY CLARE JALONICK,Associated Press 2 hours 31 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House voted unanimously Thursday for a resolution calling for any final report in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation to be made public, a symbolic action designed to pressure Attorney General William Barr into releasing as much information as possible when the probe is concluded.
The Democratic-backed resolution, which passed 420-0, comes as Mueller is nearing an end to his investigation. Lawmakers in both parties have maintained there will have to be some sort of public resolution when the report is done — and privately hope that a report shows conclusions that are favorable to their own side.
Four Republicans voted present: Michigan Rep. Justin Amash, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar and Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie.
The nonbinding resolution calls for the public release of any report Mueller provides to Barr, with an exception for classified material. The resolution also calls for the full report to be released to Congress.

"This resolution is critical because of the many questions and criticisms of the investigation raised by the president and his administration," said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler. "It is important that Congress stand up for the principle of full transparency."
It's unclear exactly what documentation will be produced at the end of the probe into possible coordination between Trump associates and Russia, and how much of that the Justice Department will allow people to see. Mueller is required to submit a report to Barr, and then Barr can decide how much of that is released publicly.
Barr said at his confirmation hearing in January that he takes seriously the department regulations that say Mueller's report should be confidential. Those regulations require only that the report explain the decisions to pursue or to decline prosecutions, which could be as simple as a bullet point list or as fulsome as a report running hundreds of pages.
"I don't know what, at the end of the day, what will be releasable. I don't know what Bob Mueller is writing," Barr said at the hearing.
The top Republican on the Judiciary panel, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, said the vote on the resolution was unnecessary but that he would support it anyway. He said he has no reason to believe that Barr won't follow the regulations.
But Democrats have said they are unsatisfied with Barr's answers and want a stronger commitment to releasing the full report, along with interview transcripts and other underlying evidence.
In introducing the resolution, Nadler and five other Democratic committee chairs said "the public is clearly served by transparency with respect to any investigation that could implicate or exonerate the president and his campaign."
Texas Rep. Will Hurd, a GOP member of the House intelligence committee, said before the vote that he believes the resolution should have been even broader to include the release of underlying evidence.
"I want the American people to know as much as they can and see as much as they can," said Hurd, a former CIA officer. He added that "full transparency is the only way to prevent future innuendo."
If a full report isn't released, House Democrats have made it clear they will do whatever they can to get hold of it. Nadler has said he would subpoena the final report and invite — or even subpoena — Mueller to talk about it.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has been less eager to push Barr on the release of the report, despite some in his caucus who have said they want to ensure transparency.
Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa introduced legislation with Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut that would require Mueller to submit a detailed report to lawmakers and the public at the end of the investigation. But both McConnell and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, have declined to say whether they would support the legislation.
Graham said he agrees "with the concept of transparency," but stopped short of supporting Grassley's bill, saying he disagrees with taking discretion away from the attorney general.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/symbolic-vote-house-says-mueller-report-public-145109428--politics.html
 

ZZZZZ

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
3,024
Likes
6,490
Location
Northern Arizona
#2
Release the damned document, all of it! No redactions! No protecting the guilty (or the innocent). The chips should fall where they may.

These bureaucrats and politicians work for us, We The People. It is OUR report, not theirs.
.
.
 
Last edited:

ZZZZZ

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
3,024
Likes
6,490
Location
Northern Arizona
#4
I like the news Scorp but I am suspicious of HOUSE purpose. Those asshats already know what it is going to say. Did they find easily twisted and spun material? Some ulterior motive MUST exist as the truth is known to give them a severe rash.
The Delusional Dems think there will be some tiny piece of dirt that Mueller overlooked or thinks is insignificant.

The Dems know that Trump will veto 99% of whatever bills they pass, so they might as well spend their time investigating him. They would have better luck investigating UFOs and Bigfoot.
.
.
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,783
Likes
7,696
Location
On a speck of dust
#5
Seems like the more they investigate, they dig up their own bones.

The Dems are used to people rolling over easily. Their thug life is being challenged. i'm loving it.
 

TomD

It blowed up, y'all
Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
4,073
Likes
5,281
Location
Florida Panhandle
#6
So the Dims want full transparency, huh? But only when the light is shining on their opposition. They are so obviously hypocritical and so often so obviously hypocritical that I'm really getting tired of the act. I can't understand how anyone in the country with an IQ equal to or higher than a wintertime thermostat setting (in Celsius) believes a single word from them.
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,783
Likes
7,696
Location
On a speck of dust
#7
So the Dims want full transparency, huh? But only when the light is shining on their opposition. They are so obviously hypocritical and so often so obviously hypocritical that I'm really getting tired of the act. I can't understand how anyone in the country with an IQ equal to or higher than a wintertime thermostat setting (in Celsius) believes a single word from them.
Liberalism does seem to be a mental illness.
 

D-FENZ

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
2,069
Likes
4,668
#8
This is nothing but a political stunt. There is no downside for this vote for the Trump haters and no upside for the Trump supporters no matter how they vote. It's a non-binding, symbolic resolution and holds no force of law.

For the slimy bastards to hold this vote before the report is even released, only encourages Team Meuller- who are the most virulent never Trumpers- to add salacious but irrelevant details strictly for public consumption and having nothing whatever to do with a proper investigation. And you know they will.
 

Fatrat

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Messages
2,208
Likes
1,732
#9
I'd like to see what I paid for...
 

Scorpio

Скорпион
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
27,350
Likes
34,140
#11
being as how they are so gung ho about releasing this in full version,

then can it also be used to release all premise to the claims?

fisa, daca, the emailer, uranium 1, the russkies, and the chins?

where they have now voted for all information including background information to be released?

mueller has went way off the reservation, which opens the door to many many things???
 

Aurumag

Ag mirror of truth Aurum purity of mind
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,784
Likes
10,243
Location
State of Jefferson
#13
When was the last time CONgress voted unanimously on ANYTHING?

Now I am even more suspicious of both the d-tards and the r-turds...
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
30,840
Likes
39,550
#15
Wouldn't it be delicious if Mueller's report details a lot of malfeasance by the FBI and goes into Clinton crime breaking, and the Dems just voted to release it to the public?!

Again, not holding my breath.
We'll probably see it sometime after 2020! Ending the Muller fiasco now, especially without indictments of the Trump crowd, severely curtails the obfuscation and obstruction which has been occurring in DC the last 2 years. No politician...not one, is working for the people of America!