- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 33,358
- Likes
- 49,416
You have heard in the past few years where we here brought it up regarding more and more inputs needed to achieve same x output,
Goes back to discussions over the years where more and more fiat gets injected into the system, but without the comparative output,
The output per unit of fiat then becomes illusory only, represented thru the financialization side of the economy, rising stocks, rising monetary digits existing in various areas, rising land prices and so on.
As you can see from the following charts, M2 changed course back in the Reagan admin, and that was the crash of 87. Throughout the klinton years, M2 was on a different trajectory, then came bush and the housing collapse, and we took off on a new course again with yet more being injected year over year. Then recently, we have this huge anomaly associated with the plandemic. Massive growth in fiat, plunging gdp. Yet that isn't really fair, as they turned off the switch to one side of the equation.
The anomaly doesn't even equate or compute. In prior recessions, draw backs, whatever you want to call them, they barely register on the chart. But this one is a big deal in both time and amount of decline vs fiat input.
I have attached a couple of charts so you can compare the rising m2 into the system vs the output of gdp. You can clearly see the 3 and now 4 glide slopes of the inputs vs the only 2 and now 3 of the gdp.
Perfectly illustrating what we have stated, greater and greater inputs to achieve less and less output.
Goes back to discussions over the years where more and more fiat gets injected into the system, but without the comparative output,
The output per unit of fiat then becomes illusory only, represented thru the financialization side of the economy, rising stocks, rising monetary digits existing in various areas, rising land prices and so on.
As you can see from the following charts, M2 changed course back in the Reagan admin, and that was the crash of 87. Throughout the klinton years, M2 was on a different trajectory, then came bush and the housing collapse, and we took off on a new course again with yet more being injected year over year. Then recently, we have this huge anomaly associated with the plandemic. Massive growth in fiat, plunging gdp. Yet that isn't really fair, as they turned off the switch to one side of the equation.
The anomaly doesn't even equate or compute. In prior recessions, draw backs, whatever you want to call them, they barely register on the chart. But this one is a big deal in both time and amount of decline vs fiat input.
I have attached a couple of charts so you can compare the rising m2 into the system vs the output of gdp. You can clearly see the 3 and now 4 glide slopes of the inputs vs the only 2 and now 3 of the gdp.
Perfectly illustrating what we have stated, greater and greater inputs to achieve less and less output.