• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Mayhem and Misunderstanding in Illinois


Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2010
Mayhem and Misunderstanding in Illinois
Posted on March 20, 2017by David Robinson
Judge Anna von Reitz

Illinois lies in the Midwest on the Great Lakes and is politically dominated by the massive Chicago urban center, yet for all the numbers of people in the City of Chicago and Cook County in particular, Cook County remains a county like any other, limited by its own geographic parameters.

This is part of the genius of the American Way. Cook County may have far more people in it than other counties in Illinois. It may be wealthier by far. It may have different problems and different options for solving its problems. At the end of the day, it’s still a county circumscribed and limited by its own borders.

Like every other county in America, it may choose to conduct its day to day business using an incorporated franchise of the United States, Inc. — or not.

The county becomes eligible for federal corporation kickbacks known as “federal revenue sharing” when it “enfranchises” itself, but it also becomes liable for federal taxation and federal regulation, becoming a virtual rubber stamp for whatever policies the privately owned and operated foreign corporation doing business as the “United States” decrees.

Like every other county in America, Cook County is ultimately and actually owned by the people living in Cook County. They get to decide whether or not to operate their county government as a federal franchise or not. This unincorporated body politic gets to assemble itself whenever an American state national living in Cook County gives a 30 day Notice and announces a public meeting of the Land Jurisdiction Cook County Assembly.

This is not the corporate version of “Cook County Assembly”.

This is the actual Body Politic as opposed to a “representational” body.

Instead of handing their proxies to an agent elected to act in their stead as a member of the Board of Directors of Cook County, Inc. calling himself an “Assemblyman”, the people have the absolute retained right to conduct their own business and to bypass the use of any agent to do their business. It’s the difference between sending your servant to town to conduct your business for you, and doing it yourself.

Whereas anyone can be elected to serve as an “Assemblyman” for Cook County, Inc., including lawyers and US CITIZENS, not just anyone can be a member of the actual Cook County Assembly.

The actual unincorporated Cook County Assembly is composed of American state nationals and Illinois State Citizens living in Cook County, Illinois. They have to be either natural born or naturalized Illinoisans and they have to be claiming that political status in order to be members of the actual, unincorporated Cook County Assembly.

The people properly claiming their birth right political status are then enabled to crack the whip and tell the members of the Cook County Assembly, Inc. what to do and how to do it, and can even tell the “Assemblymen” elected to serve on the board of Cook County, Inc. to dissolve Cook County, Inc. and resume operations as an unincorporated county.

This means an end to federal corporation kickbacks, but it also means an end to federal taxation and federal debt obligations, federal regulation and corruption in general.

As in all other counties, Cook County is defined by its geographic borders. It is a recognizable land mass. The American people living within its borders make up its Assembly. There is only one Assembly per county in America, by definition.

A county may have townships or, in the Deep South, it may have parishes; these are smaller political subunits within the county that often have their own Town Halls or Parish Centers and these may be organized to locally select delegates to the County Assembly, or not. It just depends on how the local government within the county structures itself and how Assemblymen are chosen.

All the same circumstances apply to organized townships and parishes. The people living in those townships and parishes can choose to run their township or parish as an incorporated franchise of the private, mostly foreign-owned United States, Inc. and let anyone serve as their “Assemblymen”— or they can assemble themselves, foreswear federal kickbacks in favor of freedom from federal taxes, debts, and regulations, and run their own local government at both the township/parish level and the county level.

These American people are not “United States Citizens” nor are they “citizens of the United States”. They are native-born or naturalized Americans living in their geographically defined state of the Union. They are known as Illinoisans, Texans, Wisconsinites, and so on. They are the actual owners of everything in sight, the sovereigns of the land jurisdiction states.

And it is long past due for them to return home to the land they are heir to.

Okay, so now we have Cook County, Illinois, back on the map. The actual people have given the necessary public notice of a meeting of the Land Jurisdiction Cook County Assembly.

The people attending this meeting must provide proof of their declared political status. This proof includes a Witnessed and recorded Act of Expatriation, renouncing any United States or other citizenship, and claiming back their political status as Illinoisans. It also includes proof that they have surrendered any US PERSON(S) issued to them via Birth Certificates, by returning and endorsing these Birth Certificates back to the Secretary of the Treasury, crediting the United States of America, U.S. Treasury, without recourse.

They are now free of any presumption of voluntarily acting as United States Citizens or as citizens of the United States. They emerge as the Priority Creditors and Underwriters of the United States, Inc. and all its Territorial States of States and all its Municipal franchises.

They are free men and women, attending to the business of their own county, acting through a lawful County Assembly and there is only one each such Assembly owed to every county in America.

This County Assembly is enabled to elect its own Sheriff to serve the land jurisdiction county, to uphold the public and organic law of Illinois and the United States of America. He is then the top peacekeeping officer in Cook County. He outranks – by far – all the hired police, all the detectives, all the commissioners on the incorporated “Cook County, Inc.” payroll.

The actual Cook County Assembly can also elect its own justices (Justices of the Peace) and its own Court Clerks and its own Bailiffs, Coroners, and other court officers.

There isn’t a corporation anywhere, inside or outside of the borders of Cook County, who has a right or a word to say otherwise, because within the borders of Cook County, the actual Cook County Assembly holds the absolute power of self-determination for that county and the people living in it. They can purge and pitch any law or statute put in place by “Cook County, Inc.” and they can choose to dissolve Cook County, Inc. and put an unincorporated business that is under their direct control in its place.

It should now be clear just how vital your participation in your own local government is, and how that participation or lack thereof impacts every aspect of your daily life.

It also makes clear how important your political status is. As a United States Citizen you are “presumed” to be a federal corporation employee. As a “citizen of the United States” you are presumed to be a slave owned by the federal corporation doing business as the “United States”.

Unless you are actually employed by the federal government as a military or federal civilian employee, why would you ever claim to be a United States Citizen, subject to federal Territorial law? Unless you were truly desperate for political asylum or other aid of some kind, why would you ever agree to be considered a slave and chattel owned by the United States, Inc.? Nobody in their right mind would knowingly and willingly choose that fate, instead of being a free man.

In the last several days I have been in communication with several assemblies beginning or having begun their meetings and organization efforts in Illinois. Many questions have surfaced about how to create an assembly, how to establish correct political status for its members, how to give public notices, hold elections, and in general—-how is everything supposed to work?

Does the Assembly have the power to unseat a Grand Jury member or administrator? — And so on.

[Grand Juries are totally independent of Assembly action once they are created and functioning on their own. They direct their own affairs, hire and fire their own administrators, etc. The County Assembly can impeach a whole Grand Jury that proves ineffective or unwilling to perform and can replace it with a new Grand Jury, just as a Trial Jury can be replaced from the jury pool for cause— but an Assembly is not allowed to meddle in the internal affairs of a sitting Grand Jury. Any other arrangement would quickly render the Grand Jury a political tool instead of an instrument of justice.]

These and many, many other questions have already been answered by the longest-running Post-Civil War American State Jural Assembly—the Michigan General Jural Assembly. They have written the book on the subject that everyone needs to know more about. They host a National Assembly Training Call every week on Thursday nights: 1-712-770-4170, Access Number 226823#, and they can be reached via email at http://1stmichiganassembly.info.

As you reorganize your county assemblies and state assemblies and take back control of your counties, your states, and your lives— make use of the knowledge, experience, and resources of the Michigan General Jural Assembly.

A new handbook about the Grand Jury as an institution is on the way.


Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2010
In this article Howard Freeman explains;
Our Present Commercial System of “Law”
and the REMEDY Provided for Our Protection.

The Two United States and the Law
by Howard Freeman

Do Your Ears Hang Low?

Posted on March 27, 2017by David Robinson
Judge Anna von Reitz

How many of you remember the children’s song, “Do Your Ears Hang Low?” — Remember this line— “Do your ears hang low? Do they wobble to and fro? Can you throw them over your shoulder like a Continental Soldier?…..”

This song dates from Revolutionary War times. Although it sounds silly and children still delight in it, the “ears” the rowdy Colonists were talking about weren’t attached to their heads, and the song was regularly sung by those same Continental Soldiers on the march— similar to the Marines singing “Sound Off!” as they march.

As the song makes very clear, there were soldiers called “Continental Soldiers” — and it is also clear that they were the American soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War. What other “Continental Soldiers” have you ever heard of?

They were called “Continental Soldiers” and sometimes just “Continentals” because they were landsmen not sailors, and they were protecting their land from British invasion.

Continental Soldier equals “Land Soldier” and Continental United States equals “Land United States”. It was the militias of the land that defeated the British sea-borne attackers.

Please note these same soldiers were called “Colonial Soldiers” or just “Colonials”. This in turn references the fact that the Revolutionary War was supported by the 13 Colonies.

What do you know— or should you know— about the 13 Colonies?

First, they were all very different, not just in location, but in derivation. Some of the colonies were established by England— New England and Virginia, for example— and were funded in the early days by British investment companies: New England Company, Virginia Company, etc.

Others were founded by other European Monarchies and their investment companies— New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, for example, were not founded or financed by England.

Catholic Delaware and Maryland stood cheek and jowl with Protestant Virginia Colony.

This should give everyone a clue that when the American Colonies stood up together and acted as one accord as Americans, it was not as the popular historians would have you believe a matter of a united America standing against the British. It was a matter of colonies of various European nations breaking away from the domination of Europe, and in the case of Maryland and Delaware– breaking away from the control of the Pope.

Nothing like it had ever been seen in the history of the world. No colony had ever broken free of the grip of the sponsoring nation. And here you had thirteen of them, all going for broke, and repudiating the claims of the assorted European Monarchies and the Pope, together, at once.

As such, the American Revolution was a revolution of thought, a new idea, and that idea was that men have the right of freewill and self-determination given them by their Creator, and no man— no Monarch, no Pope — has the right to dictate another’s conscience, lay claim to his body or his land or his assets, or otherwise inflict taxes and “injuries” or require payments for services rendered without his consent.

It wasn’t just the King of England being given a send up. It was the King of France, the King of the Netherlands, the King of Denmark, the King of Spain—–all the European Monarchs and the Pope—-being given their walking papers.

So now you have some key information that has been missing, perhaps, from your education on these subjects. I had Michael R. Hamilton send me an email and accuse me of just making up the name “Continental United States” and “Continental Marshals”.

Well, if I made it up, then I would own the copyright to it, correct? And there would be no need for the flap over who “owns” or doesn’t own the Continental Marshals service.

But, regrettably, I didn’t think of it. The Founders did.

The need for the Continental Marshals arose soon after the adoption of the actual Constitution, and it arose as a result of splitting the international jurisdiction owed to the united Colonies acting as the united “States of America” into delegated and undelegated powers.

In 1790, George Washington organized the first United States Districts and the first US Marshals service as a part of the fall-out of the federal Judiciary Act. They were assigned to protect the newly mandated federal maritime and admiralty courts. They served in the delegated international jurisdiction created by The Constitution.

In the same year, Benjamin Franklin organized the Continental Marshals to operate within the already established Postal Districts, to protect the Post Offices and Post Roads. Over time, the Continental (Land) Marshals became known as Federal Marshals. They served the states and the people to maintain and enforce the Public Law governing the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction that was retained by the states and the people. (Amendment X of the Bill of Rights).

Easily within my lifetime and most of yours, you have heard of both “Federal Marshals” and “US Marshals” but probably never knew the difference.

Confusion reigns because from the foundations of this country there have always been two (or more) entities calling themselves the “United States”.

To shed more light on this circumstance, I am here reprinting all of one of the immortal Howard Freeman’s articles.

Please note that since Howard wrote this some time back in the 1990’s or 2000’s, the Uniform Commercial Code has been renumbered and the actual Code Section that allows you to retain your constitutional guarantees is no longer UCC 1-207, but is now instead UCC 1-308.

Also note the confusion that arises at the end of the article when even Howard Freeman used “Federal” as a catch-all term instead of distinguishing between “US” (delegated) and “Federal” (non-delegated) powers.

It was to avoid this confusion that I suggested resurrecting the original name “Continental Marshals” and using that instead of “Federal Marshals” so that people would more readily grasp the fact that the Continental Marshals work for the land jurisdiction states and the people and be able to set them apart from “United States Marshals” who work for the incorporated UNITED STATES, INC.

Thanks to both ignorance and guile in some quarters, the re-use of the name “Continental Marshals” was used to spawn a new and different confusion— at least in the minds of some less informed people— who have attempted to call state militiamen “continental marshals”.

It boils down to this, folks— the states of the union have the iron-clad guarantee that they can keep their “well-regulated militias” and they need to make use of that guarantee by retaining that name for their state-based armed forces. There is a fundamental guarantee lost by calling militiamen “marshals”.

When we knowingly operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea, we have historical precedent going back to Ben Franklin for using officers called “Continental Marshals” and later “Federal Marshals” to enforce the undelegated international jurisdiction owed to the states and people.

If we want to retain our freedom and restore our lawful government instead of going off the tracks and engaging in an insurrectionist folly, it only makes sense to cut the confusion to the bone and call offices and officers by their historically correct names.

As you read this article, “The Two United States and the Law” also bear in mind that since Freeman wrote this—and although what he says remains fundamentally true—another sleight of hand has taken place and the original “United States” he correctly refers to as the “continental United States” has dropped completely off the board (unless we resurrect it) and the “Two United States” currently being employed by the rats in Congress are the Territorial United States (what Freeman calls the “Federal United States”) and the Municipal United States, so that we are denied access to any of the constitutional guarantees as long as we submit to being counted either “United States Citizens” or “citizens of the United States”:

The Two United States and the Law
by Howard Freeman
Our forefathers, weary of the oppressive measures that King George III’s government forced upon them, in common declared their independence from England in 1776. They were not expected to be successful in that resistance. The moneyed people had backed England for two major reasons. First, our forefathers wanted a rigid, written Constitution “set in concrete.” They were familiar with the so-called Constitution of England which consisted largely of customs, precedents, traditions, and understandings, often vague and always flexible. They wanted the principle of English common law, that an act done by any official person or law-making body beyond his or its legal competence was simply void. Second, the thirteen little colonies desired to base their union on substance (gold and silver) — real money. They well knew how the despotic governments of Europe were mortgaged to the hilt — lock, stock, and barrel, the land, the people, everything — to certain wealthy men who controlled the banks, the currency, and all credit, who lent credit but did not loan gold and silver!

The United States of America was made up of a union of what is now fifty sovereign States, a three-branch (legislative, executive, and judicial) Republic known as The United States of America, or as termed in this article, the Continental United States. Its citizenry live in one of the fifty States, and its laws are based on the Constitution, which is based on Common Law.

Less than one hundred years after we became a nation, a loophole was discovered in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They realized that a separate nation existed, by the same name, that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. This “United States” is a Legislative Democracy within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its citizenry, the residents of the District of Columbia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a citizen by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized citizens).

Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations. One “United States,” the Republic of fifty States, has the “stars and stripes” as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal United States’ flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).

Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases (1) at Law, (2) in Equity, and (3) in Admiralty:

(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force — for the same reason — cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance. Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between “legal” and “lawful.” Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]

(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.

(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty.

By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned everything — the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The remainder of this article explains how this happened, where we are today, and what remedy we have to protect ourselves from this system.

Our Present Commercial System of “Law”
and the REMEDY Provided for Our Protection

The present commercial system of “law” has replaced the old and familiar Common Law upon which our nation was founded. The following is the legal thread which brought us from sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) to discharge our debts with limited liability instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad v. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law — or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.

Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument’s Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the United States (which “United States” has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the “United States,” which is the Union of the fifty States).

In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the “benefits” offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.

This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called “benefit” offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.

This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States, to distinguish it from the Continental United States, whose origin was in the Union of the Sovereign States.

The same national Congress rules the Continental United States pursuant to Constitutional limits upon its authority, while it enjoys exclusive rule, with no Constitutional limitations, as it legislates for the Federal United States.

With the above information, we may ask: “How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States, lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and also become subject to that entity of government, and divorced from our Sovereign States in the Republic, which we call here the Continental United States?” We do not reside, work, or have income from any territory subject to the direct jurisdiction of the Federal United States. These are questions that have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years. Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of the legal profession is the cause of that divorce, but a knowledge of the truth concerning the legal thread, which caught us in its net, will restore our former status as a free Preamble citizen of the
Republic. The answer follows:

Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some “law” passed by Congress, ask themselves, “Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?” Or, few ask,
“Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?”

Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for “cunning” political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of “legalese.” Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts.

At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the “benefit” of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no longer needed to pay their debts, that they were now “privileged” to discharge debt with this more “convenient” currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to “go modern,” and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic.

From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments.

Since all contracts since Roosevelt’s time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black’s Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth.”]

Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law.

All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called “statutes” of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not “statutes” passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as “commercial obligations” to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the “benefit,” or “privilege,” of discharging his debts with the limited liability “benefit” offered to him by the Federal United States … EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.

When used in conjunction with one’s signature, a stamp stating “Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207” is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called “courts”) that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract.

Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him “curse the darkness” of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.
Last edited:


Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2010
Why Clinging to Your Chains is Not the Answer
Posted on April 2, 2017by David Robinson
Judge Anna von Reitz

[I provided this as a reply to a man worried about the impact of expatriation from federal corporation “citizenship” and what surrender of the federal PERSONS associated with his name might do to Social Security payments, etc., that are now owed to him.

He expressed a fear that he might be jumping from the frying pan into the fire and might lose what little he had.

In fact, doing what I suggest guarantees getting out of the fire for good, and back to the land jurisdiction and lawful government you are owed—-so long as you get on your hind feet and take action to restore your lawful local county and state government.

Toward that end— attend the National Assembly Training Calls being hosted by the Michigan General Jural Assembly each Thursday evening, 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, 1-712-770-4170, access code 226823#. You can also contact them at: http://1stmichiganassembly.info.

Every state in the union has a different history and to restore yours to full functioning will require that you get involved and take the steps to (1) declare your proper political status; (2) join your county jural assembly for the land jurisdiction state; (3) join your local militia, either as a member or a supporting member; (4) research your own state and county history and (5) get organized to operate the land jurisdiction county and state government owed to you.

If you want to be counted as an American and enjoy your property, your rights, and your guarantees—- the way has been prepared for you to do so.]


Since 1868 the “federal government” has been organized and operated as a corporation providing governmental services.

First we had “The United States of America, Inc.” and that was bankrupted 1907.

Then we had “the United States of America, Inc.” and that was bankrupted 1933.

Now we have the “UNITED STATES [INC.]” and that is being liquidated as of 2015.

As I described yesterday, none of these bankruptcies have been honest. They have all involved false claims and hypothecation of debt against innocent people and their lawful states of the Union.

And it hasn’t just been our country involved in this morass of fraud and similar names deceits and false claims of every possible kind.

Precisely similar con games have taken place throughout the world since the 1800’s.

The original federal service provider was an unincorporated trading company called the “United States” (Trading Company) This company was owned by Brits, Americans, Dutch, Spanish, French…… and it got started well prior to the Revolutionary War. George Washington was its eleventh “President” — not its first. This company won all the delegated services contracts mandated by the original Constitution —- mutual defense, and all the other nineteen enumerated “powers” that the states enabled to federal organization to provide in common to the subscribing states.

The original state-based government association was also an unincorporated trading company called “the united States of America”. This company was owned and operated by the state government organizations. It started out having all powers of the member states in international jurisdiction and it contracted away nineteen of those powers.

So you see that the original Constitution was an equity contract in which the united States of America delegated away nineteen of its native powers to the United States organization, which was to provide those services in common for all the member states.

This was part of the settlement of the Revolutionary War. The Brits and Europeans needed American raw materials, but the Americans had no navy to protect their commercial shipping, so a deal was made by which the British navy protected our merchant marine vessels “on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways”.

So you are no doubt saying—- fine, dandy, what in the world does all this have to do with my situation and my question?

You have been mistaken/mischaracterized as an employee and/or dependent of the UNITED STATES, INC.

You were never even eligible for “Social Security” unless you actually were a federal employee or dependent.

You were signed up and enrolled by the United States, Inc. under false pretenses and purposeful self-interested disinformation. They operated under color of law and told you that you “had to” sign up for Social Security in order to have a job—- which is only true if you happened to be signing up for a federal job.

You enrolled under the false impression that you were required to do so by a mandate of your lawful government, but it was actually the foreign federal contractor dba “United States” acting under color of law and lying by omission.

When you signed up for Social Security under this duress and disinformation a number of things happened. First and foremost you innocently gave the Social Security Administration a general Power of Attorney allowing them to control your affairs. They set up a Masterfile ACCOUNT. This ACCOUNT was held in your FIRST MIDDLE LAST name and assigned a number that you readily recognize in the form 123-45-6789. This thing thus created out of thin air is a PERSON — originally a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust — and the Social Security Number was later used to identify you as a Taxpayer, also.

Via this backdoor means, the rats endeavored to enslave both you and your actual employers and to enforce federal regulation and taxation on your PERSON and to use your ACCOUNT as a public trust account that they could plunder at will.

When you signed your first 1040 Form and innocently agreed that you were operating as a “Withholding Agent” you were then assumed to be a Warrant Officer in the Merchant Marines. This brought your PERSON under Admiralty Law and totally ended any claim you had to any constitutional guarantees or protections.

All of this is complete, utter hokum—- but as a result, you have been “presumed” to be an employee of the federal corporation, held to account as an officer in the Merchant Marines, obligated to perform every whim of Congress, judged under Martial Law, forced to pay taxes as a federal corporation franchise, and worse of all—– everything you own including your children, your land, your businesses, your bank accounts—-everything has been seized upon by the UNITED STATES, INC. as collateral belonging to their private, mostly foreign-owned corporation.

They and their deceptively named STATE OF STATE franchises have used you to underwrite all their debts and steal title to all your assets and sell interest in all this to investors all over the world.

And now the perverts are under liquidation. The bankruptcy trustees (working for banks) are now liquidating the UNITED STATES and selling off all its franchises to the highest bidders at the equivalent of Fire Sales.

So they are selling off the STATE OF OHIO franchise and the CLARK COUNTY, WISCONSIN franchise and they are also busily selling off your PERSON which is supposed to represent your “decedent estate”—- which includes everything you own including your body, your home, your land, your constitutional guarantees—- everything.

These outrageous vermin are pretending that you knew about and consented to all this and that you have willingly and knowingly vacated your own estate and donated it all to them in exchange for welfare benefits and old age pensions that you paid for yourself.

In order to make this “legal” though not “lawful”, they have left you a remedy buried in thousands of pages of “government” gobbledygook. You can (1) “claim your exemption” from all this, though nobody tells you how, and you can (2) “revoke your election” to pay federal taxes though nobody tells you how, and finally, you can (3) return the federal PERSON and be done with the entire bunch of crap, reclaim your natural birthright estate and political status, and tell them to SHOVE IT—–but again, nobody tells you how.


Well, all this criminal fraud and racketeering has taken place on our shores and has been done by a foreign corporation operating on our shores in criminal breach of trust and commercial contract. We are the priority creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC. and we have shoved this bull crap down the throats of all those responsible— the banks, the politicians, the lawyers.

Other than the bankrupt UNITED STATES, the most recent organization holding the federal contract was the United States of America, Inc. which was bankrupted in 1933. When that bankruptcy settled in 1999, all debts of the Foreign Situs Trusts operating under Upper and Lower Case Names like this: John Michael Doe —- were stripped clean and released. They didn’t cease to exist, but like any bankrupt, were left as a derelict shell belonging to the Roman Catholic Church and the Holy See.

I came back and claimed all the land jurisdiction States owed to this formerly bankrupt corporation as a basis of operations with a chain of title going all the way back through The United States of America, Inc. to the United States of America, Inc. and thence to the united States of America Trading Company.

As a thing is bound, it is unbound. As a result, you can now “return” to the United States of America, Inc. land jurisdiction states, which in turn will kick you right back to the original trading company, the united States of America. You can no longer be presumed to be operating in “commerce” and no longer under US jurisdiction. Because it is a pass-through already established, you can’t be considered a possession of the United States of America, Inc., either.

This is possible because it was all properly given Notice and Due Process and then placed under Lien and because I also placed the credit owed to Jesus on the books of the Vatican Chancery Court in payment of absolutely everything associated with this—- FRANCISCUS doesn’t have a leg to stand on to object.

You have states to come home to and you have all your debts paid and the vermin have no excuse to attach your bank accounts, your land, your businesses, your children, or anything else. And instead of jumping from the frying pan into the fire, which is what you suggested in asking your question in the first place—– when you flip the switch and “surrender” the federal PERSONS operating in your NAME as I have instructed—-you can no longer be “presumed” to be associated with the UNITED STATES, INC. in any way. Your ACCOUNT will be transferred first to the land jurisdiction state dba Wisconsin State, Florida State, etc., of the United States of America, Inc. and from there passed back through to the “united States of America” which is an unincorporated Trading Company owned and operated by the actual states of the Union.

What happens to all the “federal pension” and “welfare” and “SSI”—–? Well, all that stuff being paid out of the Public Charitable Trust (“PCT”) that was set up as a welfare trust to care for the needs of displaced plantation slaves in the wake of the so-called “Civil War” will be replaced. All those “federal entitlement” programs will cease to exist, but all the money and assets that you are actually owed will be returned, so it won’t matter two bits to you that you no longer have fifth rate welfare benefits to depend on in your old age. You will be able to pay for your own first-rate health insurance.

[Not only is this far better than any government program and more adaptable to your needs, but as the UNITED STATES, INC. is insolvent and under liquidation and the entire affair is under criminal investigation, it is unlikely that any such “entitlements” will continue.]

So, the Kingdom of Heaven has redeemed the Kingdom of God (Gold, Order, and Dominion). Satan has been bound— literally—and the One Thousand Years of peace we are all owed, has been declared.

This is it, folks, and since the Holy See owns all these corporations, including the UNITED STATES and GERMANY and FRANCE and the Holy See’s Unum Sanctum Trust has been acknowledged, accepted, and re-conveyed —-to the ownership and control of Jesus and his living Brothers and Sisters who are willing to abide by the Law of Heaven— nothing remains but for you to decide which foot you are standing on and give back the federal PERSON that is enslaving you.