Ahhh! I see now! I was right...
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
POST YOUR FAVORITE OR NON-FAVORITE POLITICAL CARTOONS HERE!
- Thread starter TAEZZAR
- Start date
I thought they were posts about whats-his-name.
Captain Dementia?
Is The Night of the Long Knives Part Deux far off to begin cleansing us of these communists?
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,306
- Reaction score
- 16,646
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,306
- Reaction score
- 16,646
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,306
- Reaction score
- 16,646
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 17,803
- Reaction score
- 26,552
LIKED IT, STOLE IT, SENT IT OUT.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
Sec 98 of what, please?
don't know, but there is a clue to start researching....
We've already gone over this. When were there 50 states?
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
Please edumacate us again...
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 98:
“While an emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions. Public emergency such as economic depression for especially liberal construction of constitutional powers and it has been declared that because of national emergency, it is the policy of the courts of times of national peril, so liberally to construed the special powers vested in the chief executive as to sustain an effectuate the purpose there of, and to that end also more liberally to construed the constituted division and classification of the powers of the coordinate branches of the government and in so far as may not be clearly inconsistent with the constitution.”
(No emergency has just cause to suppress the constitution.)
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of
law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of
law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
It is unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunals unless there is no civilian court available.
supreme.justia.com
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
There were only 34 states during the Civil War. It wasn't until 1958 that there were 50 states.
OOPS!
What if no civilian court will hear the cases??Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
It is unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunals unless there is no civilian court available.
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)
INSANITY!!!!
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2014
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 159
Nice!
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,332
- Reaction score
- 9,646
16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 98: was written/published in 1962.
Might just be a paid schill... with all the money at stake for the medical industrial complex it's almost a certainty that messages like this are used to manipulate and grow profits
That’s more than the quiet part out loud
She spilled every bean in the cupboard
It’s short don’t miss it
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 17,803
- Reaction score
- 26,552
Then you have the November Presidential Election of 2020.
Black Robe Job Security
1959...the other 7 states that obummer speaks of are known only to him and they will be revealed when the info on the JFK story comes out....along with the computers used for the moon landings.
A longer version of that interview for context:
She's a piece of shit, the added context makes her look worse.
Because remember? The media declares the winner of the election....
She's CCP talking directly to the American people and the sheep are nodding obediently in agreement!