![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](https://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
"Q's" posts---
- Thread starter TRYNEIN
- Start date
Well Unca Walt, you're a stronger man than me. I've seen such images before and I just couldn't or wouldn't open any of those files.
As far as what has happened to humanity, the sad truth is that evil has been among us for millenia. The only thing different is the growth in the practice...yes, the evil is only spreading...
As far as what has happened to humanity, the sad truth is that evil has been among us for millenia. The only thing different is the growth in the practice...yes, the evil is only spreading...
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,904
- Likes
- 11,069
And I won't buy the story that the portrait was seen in Epstein's mansion unless Q confirms it.
The artist who painted it is Petrina Ryan-Kleid. Her profile says this:
You can see the left edge of this portrait to the right of the Bill Clinton portrait in the picture above.
"Be careful who you follow." -- Q
The artist who painted it is Petrina Ryan-Kleid. Her profile says this:
Petrina's specialty is realism with a focus on satire. Her subjects are often politicians and celebrities. Petrina has exhibited her work in both Australia and the United States. Her most recent exhibit was in April 2013 at the Yashir Gallery in Greenpoint, Brooklyn.
She also did one of George W Bush sitting on the floor of the Oval Office with paper airplanes, etc.You can see the left edge of this portrait to the right of the Bill Clinton portrait in the picture above.
Circled in the picture below. Someone obviously covered the body of GWB with orange to hide it for some reason but from the unaltered part, you can see it's the picture shown above.
So much crazy stuff. Especially when Q is quiet for a while. Remember the whole thing with "R" and "JFK Jr is alive" started during a period when Q was silent. I think I will just discount stuff until Q comes back. If he confirms it, then I will reconsider."Be careful who you follow." -- Q
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 5,544
- Likes
- 9,788
This is why I cling so tightly to Jesus...and the hope of restoration He offers...
Why? Aside from the fact that I truly believe it to be true - I also see it as the only alternative to a very dark sinister future (if our species is even able to survive).
Every other "future state" that is based on rational thought and an objective worldview leads to the same depressing conclusion. We as a species are completely fucked up - and the root cause of it is simply the fact that we are savage animals with a patina of respectability spray painted on.
Given enough time - and technological advancements...there is zero doubt in my mind that all humans will be totally and completely subjugated to an uncaring and unmerciful power that seeks only to extract from them every ounce of their humanity, spirit and life. And that isnt even taking into account the far likelier outcome that we will simply kill ourselves - whether with biological weapons, poisoning the water supply, nuclear, etc...
Jesus Christ is the only true hope that any of us really has...
Why? Aside from the fact that I truly believe it to be true - I also see it as the only alternative to a very dark sinister future (if our species is even able to survive).
Every other "future state" that is based on rational thought and an objective worldview leads to the same depressing conclusion. We as a species are completely fucked up - and the root cause of it is simply the fact that we are savage animals with a patina of respectability spray painted on.
Given enough time - and technological advancements...there is zero doubt in my mind that all humans will be totally and completely subjugated to an uncaring and unmerciful power that seeks only to extract from them every ounce of their humanity, spirit and life. And that isnt even taking into account the far likelier outcome that we will simply kill ourselves - whether with biological weapons, poisoning the water supply, nuclear, etc...
Jesus Christ is the only true hope that any of us really has...
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,904
- Likes
- 11,069
Hillary Clinton’s Emails Were Sent to Gmail Address Similar to Name of Chinese Company
BY IVAN PENTCHOUKOV, August 15, 2019
https://www.theepochtimes.com/hilla...ess-with-a-chinese-companys-name_3043380.html
Brian Cates, 42 tweets, 15 min read
Last edited:
Well I be goddamn! I don't think they have much choice. Do you think the Media can bury this story?, Hell no they can't. Too many alternative news channels. I pray that this is it, They are all going down. GITMO, get ready to receive some high value prisoners.
Not that they are not going to try to bury it. May be the reason they took Tucker off the air.
Nothing on Main Stream this morning.
Q told us to get ready. I just wish I knew what we can do to get ready. Just brace yourself for some horrific false flags, and keep,telling yourself "I am not a conspiracy theorist, I am not a conspiracy theorist", over and over again.
Not that they are not going to try to bury it. May be the reason they took Tucker off the air.
Nothing on Main Stream this morning.
Q told us to get ready. I just wish I knew what we can do to get ready. Just brace yourself for some horrific false flags, and keep,telling yourself "I am not a conspiracy theorist, I am not a conspiracy theorist", over and over again.
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 34,203
- Likes
- 45,794
We've been on the precipice for a long time but we still wake up every day talking and reading and predicting events that don't happen. In the meantime, while all this is droning on, evidence is being destroyed, witnesses turn up dead and the country continues to buckle under the weight of Bolshevik attacks!
Last edited:
Who Was Stefan Halper?
by Matt Palumbo Posted: September 3, 2018
Authored by: Matt Palumbo
Just two months before the 2016 election, former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos received a random meeting request from Stefan Halper, a University of Cambridge professor and member of the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar (CIS), which was founded by officers from British intelligence agencies. Halper was involved in a CIA spying scandal in the 1980s to benefit Ronald Reagan’s campaign, and while his history is as a Republican, he publicly supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
So why was he speaking to Papadapoulos? Because Halper was the FBI’s inside source to infiltrate the Trump campaign.
Halper asked Papadopoulos to fly to London to discuss international relations and the possibility of Papadopoulos writing a policy paper on a gas field in the Mediterranean for $3,000. This was all cover so Halper could try to fish information out of Papadapous. Once they met, Halper was quick to turn to the subject of Russia, asking Papadopoulos, “You know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?” Papadopoulos didn’t offer up any information, and contact with Halper didn’t extend much past that trip. Papadapoulos would finish and submit his policy paper to Halper, but there’s no evidence it was ever used for anything.
Advertisement
Months prior, Papadapoulos had a serious of meetings with Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor who at one point claimed to have Hillary Clinton’s hacked emails (he didn’t), and Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos would (allegedly drunkenly) tell he (falsely) had possession of Hillary’s emails. Mifsud reportedly only became interested in Papadapoulos after learning of his role within the Trump campaign, while Downer requested his meeting with Papadapoulos. Both are of note because Mifsud is on record having donated to the Clinton Foundation, and Downer helped broker a $25 million donation from the Australian government to the Clinton Foundation. Neither were political allies of Papadapoulos, but had their sights on him.
Why? To help further a narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, which Halper was well aware of.
Downer would later go to the FBI to report Papadapoulos’ claim, which would later be the claimed justification for the FBI’s counterintelligence operation into the Trump campaign (though John Brennan claims it was actions he took which sparked the investigation). Regardless, the FBI now had a reasonable excuse to spy on the Trump campaign (regardless of their actual motive, to secure Hillary Clinton’s presidential victory).
Papadopoulos says Halper wasn’t the only suspicious person to approach him. There were two others. Papadopoulos’ wife, Simona Mangiante, told The Daily Caller that one of the contacts offered him $30,000 a month during his time with the Trump team to work as a consultant. According to Mangiante:
In addition to Papadapoulos, Halper also made contact with Trump campaign co-chair Sam Clovis and Carter Page, who was surveilled by the FBI.
Halper and the Steele Dossier
Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson first hinted at the existence of Halper when he testified to Congress that the information in Christopher Steele’s dossier mirrored that of an FBI informant in the Trump campaign. Simpson told Congress, the FBI believed “Chris’ information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human.”
Who else could that have been except Halper?
Page and Halper first met at a conference in London on July 11th and 12th, which was when Page was on his returning trip from Moscow (a detail included in Steele’s dossier). The two then remained in contact during the following months. That conference was also attended by former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, an associate of both Halper and dossier author Christopher Steele, who was working with the FBI at the time of Halper’s spying. Dearlove and Steele met in early fall of 2016, so Steele could get his advice on how to move forward with the information in his dossier.
Halper would also met with Sam Clovis, but only once. Halper would later pitch himself as an ambassador to China for the Trump team after his presidential victory. In other words, even after Trump’s victory, the FBI looked to keep a spy planted within the presidency.
Advertisement
For more on the unprecedented infiltration of the Trump campaign, pre-order our forthcoming book “Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump.”
by Matt Palumbo Posted: September 3, 2018
Authored by: Matt Palumbo
Just two months before the 2016 election, former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos received a random meeting request from Stefan Halper, a University of Cambridge professor and member of the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar (CIS), which was founded by officers from British intelligence agencies. Halper was involved in a CIA spying scandal in the 1980s to benefit Ronald Reagan’s campaign, and while his history is as a Republican, he publicly supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
So why was he speaking to Papadapoulos? Because Halper was the FBI’s inside source to infiltrate the Trump campaign.
Halper asked Papadopoulos to fly to London to discuss international relations and the possibility of Papadopoulos writing a policy paper on a gas field in the Mediterranean for $3,000. This was all cover so Halper could try to fish information out of Papadapous. Once they met, Halper was quick to turn to the subject of Russia, asking Papadopoulos, “You know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?” Papadopoulos didn’t offer up any information, and contact with Halper didn’t extend much past that trip. Papadapoulos would finish and submit his policy paper to Halper, but there’s no evidence it was ever used for anything.
Advertisement
So where did that comment about Hillary’s emails come from?Months prior, Papadapoulos had a serious of meetings with Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor who at one point claimed to have Hillary Clinton’s hacked emails (he didn’t), and Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos would (allegedly drunkenly) tell he (falsely) had possession of Hillary’s emails. Mifsud reportedly only became interested in Papadapoulos after learning of his role within the Trump campaign, while Downer requested his meeting with Papadapoulos. Both are of note because Mifsud is on record having donated to the Clinton Foundation, and Downer helped broker a $25 million donation from the Australian government to the Clinton Foundation. Neither were political allies of Papadapoulos, but had their sights on him.
Why? To help further a narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, which Halper was well aware of.
Downer would later go to the FBI to report Papadapoulos’ claim, which would later be the claimed justification for the FBI’s counterintelligence operation into the Trump campaign (though John Brennan claims it was actions he took which sparked the investigation). Regardless, the FBI now had a reasonable excuse to spy on the Trump campaign (regardless of their actual motive, to secure Hillary Clinton’s presidential victory).
Papadopoulos says Halper wasn’t the only suspicious person to approach him. There were two others. Papadopoulos’ wife, Simona Mangiante, told The Daily Caller that one of the contacts offered him $30,000 a month during his time with the Trump team to work as a consultant. According to Mangiante:
It looks to be one among a series of attempts to entrap George. The question today to me [is whether] these people are simply shady businessmen or are they part of a greater attempt to entrap George in illegal activity.
And speaking of entrapment, while Papadapoulos didn’t do anything legally wrong, he’d later be charged with lying to the FBI about his conversations. That’s the same charge that Michael Flynn faced, even though the FBI agents who interviewed him didn’t believe that he lied. Unsurprisingly, Halper also spread a bogus warning to American authorities that Flynn was at risk of being compromised by Russian intelligence because of his relationship with a female journalist named Svetlana Lokhova. Why? Because in 2014 Flynn sat next to her at a dinner hosted by CIS. Lokhova said she thought the allegations were a joke, adding “In Britain, I am now being accused of being a Russian spy. In Russia, some think I am a British spy. And I am neither.”In addition to Papadapoulos, Halper also made contact with Trump campaign co-chair Sam Clovis and Carter Page, who was surveilled by the FBI.
Halper and the Steele Dossier
Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson first hinted at the existence of Halper when he testified to Congress that the information in Christopher Steele’s dossier mirrored that of an FBI informant in the Trump campaign. Simpson told Congress, the FBI believed “Chris’ information might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human.”
Who else could that have been except Halper?
Page and Halper first met at a conference in London on July 11th and 12th, which was when Page was on his returning trip from Moscow (a detail included in Steele’s dossier). The two then remained in contact during the following months. That conference was also attended by former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, an associate of both Halper and dossier author Christopher Steele, who was working with the FBI at the time of Halper’s spying. Dearlove and Steele met in early fall of 2016, so Steele could get his advice on how to move forward with the information in his dossier.
Halper would also met with Sam Clovis, but only once. Halper would later pitch himself as an ambassador to China for the Trump team after his presidential victory. In other words, even after Trump’s victory, the FBI looked to keep a spy planted within the presidency.
Advertisement
Given the excess number of leaks from the Trump White House during the first two years of the presidency, I wouldn’t be surprised if there were others who did manage to make their way in.For more on the unprecedented infiltration of the Trump campaign, pre-order our forthcoming book “Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump.”
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,904
- Likes
- 11,069
NYT staffer inquiries as to how exactly the media was then planning major project to shift narrative to "racism" after Mule op flop
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/08/new-york-times-meeting-transcript.html?via=recirc_recent
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/08/new-york-times-meeting-transcript.html?via=recirc_recent
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,904
- Likes
- 11,069
The irony escaped you?
When anyone else posts info about progress that is being made, you are always quick to moan about how nobody has been swinging from a rope yet.
So when you posted a post showing progress that is being made, I replied with your standard reply (I thought it was only appropriate), "This is all very interesting. When is anything actually done about it? When???"
When anyone else posts info about progress that is being made, you are always quick to moan about how nobody has been swinging from a rope yet.
So when you posted a post showing progress that is being made, I replied with your standard reply (I thought it was only appropriate), "This is all very interesting. When is anything actually done about it? When???"
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,904
- Likes
- 11,069