• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

"Q's" posts---

Thecrensh

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
9,930
Likes
15,095
General Flynn says everyone should see this movie....

Someone uploaded the movie to YouTube yesterday but it will probably be taken down at some point. Watch or download it now if you are interested.

THE PLOT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT - DOCUMENTARY. October 9th, 2020 (1:32:10)​
Published on Oct 25, 2020 by Steve WWG1WGA​

If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available to watch free on Prime.
EZRA COHEN WATNICK!
 

Aurumag

Ag mirror of truth Aurum purity of mind
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
12,075
Likes
17,051
Location
State of Jefferson
Why would he wait until after the election? If it's published in the Dailymail then these people mentioned undoubtedly KNOW they are on the "execution list". If these people are against him, and could sabotage Trump, then Shouldn't he fire these people right now?
This is standard procedure for ALL POTUS admins in preparation for the second term.

The only surprise is that anyone is actually surprised:

Trump personnel office weighs asking appointees to offer their resignations

The potential plan is angering officials who fear it will cause chaos in their personal lives as they plot their next moves.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/09/white-house-appointees-resignations-428412

The White House Presidential Personnel Office is considering asking nearly every political appointee in the Trump administration to write and tender provisional letters of resignation right before the election, according to two senior administration officials.

The personnel office would then decide which ones to accept and which to reject — giving President Donald Trump maximum flexibility in choosing his team in a possible second term.

...
 

Thecrensh

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
9,930
Likes
15,095
General Flynn says everyone should see this movie....

Someone uploaded the movie to YouTube yesterday but it will probably be taken down at some point. Watch or download it now if you are interested.

THE PLOT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT - DOCUMENTARY. October 9th, 2020 (1:32:10)​
Published on Oct 25, 2020 by Steve WWG1WGA​

If you have Amazon Prime, the movie is available to watch free on Prime.
Damn. That was the best 1.5 hour's I've spent in a while. This needs to be spread far and wide...and honestly, I see this a prep for the public for what's coming if Trump wins (and if he doesn't).

If Trump wins, there will be accountability for what happened.

If Trump loses, there will be more of what happened.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,701
Likes
105,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
The White House Presidential Personnel Office is considering asking nearly every political appointee in the Trump administration to write and tender provisional letters of resignation right before the election, according to two senior administration officials.
I thought they always did that from the git go...? That way they control the crew....
 

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,900
Likes
96,201
Location
Earth

ABC123

Midas Board Mmbr
Platinum Bling
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
7,600
Likes
15,830
Fifteen HUGE YouTube Creators File Federal Lawsuit Against YouTube for Violating First Amendment

October 27, 2020



Fifteen popular YouTube creators have filed a federal lawsuit against YouTube and Google for violating their first amendment rights.

According to the lawsuit, Google and YouTube breached the Terms of Service those creators had agreed to when they signed on and violated their First Amendment rights.

Petersantilli.com reports: According to the press release the Plaintiffs are these popular creators of YouTube channels, with collectively lay claim to over 800 million views: JustInformed Talk, SGT Report, X22 Report, SpaceShot 76, TruReporting, RedPill78, Edge of Wonder, Praying Medic, Amazing Polly, Woke Societies, Daniel Lee, Deception Byes, InTheMatrixxx, Destroying the Illusion, and Sarah Westall.

The Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys M. Cris Armenta and Credence Sol. Both are former federal law clerks; Ms. Armenta in the Central District of California, and Ms. Sol in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ms. Armenta has been named one of the top 100 female attorneys in California and is on the peer‐reviewed SuperLawyers list for civil litigation who fully expect YouTube and Google defend the case and claim that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides them immunity for the actions taken against conservative YouTube commentators and content creators.

The lawsuit also alleges that YouTube acted at the behest, was encouraged by and coerced by Congress, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff who published a complaint on Congressional letterhead that urged content be removed and replaced. The press release goes further to explain: The Plaintiffs allege that under Supreme Court precedent, if a private party acts when it is encouraged or coerced by the government or its agents, then the state action theory applies and the First Amendment rights should be protected, particularly from viewpoint discrimination. Since Adam Schiff, a sitting representative, personally and publicly in his official capacity asked for social media platforms to begin censoring conservative content providers and YouTube thereafter responded and complied to that request, the door was opened for this lawsuit.

The Plaintiffs expect that they will either receive or be denied an emergency injunction, or a restraining order upon Youtube, requiring that their accounts be reinstated. If the lawsuit proceeds as expected, it is anticipated that the legal issues raised in the complaint may finally settle the issues relating to Big Tech’s immunity from lawsuits under the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The implications are immense, and the public deserves to be well informed on the progress of this landmark case.

We will continue to provide updates as litigation proceeds.



https://newspunch.com/fifteen-huge-youtube-creators-file-federal-lawsuit-against-youtube-for-violating-first-amendment/
 

Alton

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
6,908
Likes
14,331
Location
Michiana
Yep! Might as well get their pound of flesh with a HUGE class action lawsuit against ALL before the DoJ tosses Zuck and crew in jail and congress limits social media to simply providing a platform. As far as Alphabet/Google, they need far more pain, impoverishment and control applied to them for playing footsie with Chin Li....and none of this "break-up of Ma Bell" sort of BS as courts have done to monopolies before.
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,497
Likes
21,580
OUT OF SHADOWS - UPDATE 07032020 (3 min 35 sec):


Published on Jul 3, 2020 by outofshadows​
The video is available on their own website now and downloadable.

https://www.outofshadows.org

3 videos:
  • Out of Shadows Documentary (01:17:58)
  • Covid-19 Strategy (00:09:04)
  • Censorship Campaign (00:00:17)
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,701
Likes
105,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
President Trump's War On Human Trafficking

President Trump's administration has made ending human trafficking a priority of his administration since day one of his presidency. Trump has done more to fight the war on sex trafficking than any president in history. This is the report you'll never see in the mainstream media.

Liz Crokin
 

chieftain

Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
2,348
Likes
3,367
Fifteen HUGE YouTube Creators File Federal Lawsuit Against YouTube for Violating First Amendment

October 27, 2020



Fifteen popular YouTube creators have filed a federal lawsuit against YouTube and Google for violating their first amendment rights.

According to the lawsuit, Google and YouTube breached the Terms of Service those creators had agreed to when they signed on and violated their First Amendment rights.

Petersantilli.com reports: According to the press release the Plaintiffs are these popular creators of YouTube channels, with collectively lay claim to over 800 million views: JustInformed Talk, SGT Report, X22 Report, SpaceShot 76, TruReporting, RedPill78, Edge of Wonder, Praying Medic, Amazing Polly, Woke Societies, Daniel Lee, Deception Byes, InTheMatrixxx, Destroying the Illusion, and Sarah Westall.

The Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys M. Cris Armenta and Credence Sol. Both are former federal law clerks; Ms. Armenta in the Central District of California, and Ms. Sol in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ms. Armenta has been named one of the top 100 female attorneys in California and is on the peer‐reviewed SuperLawyers list for civil litigation who fully expect YouTube and Google defend the case and claim that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides them immunity for the actions taken against conservative YouTube commentators and content creators.

The lawsuit also alleges that YouTube acted at the behest, was encouraged by and coerced by Congress, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff who published a complaint on Congressional letterhead that urged content be removed and replaced. The press release goes further to explain: The Plaintiffs allege that under Supreme Court precedent, if a private party acts when it is encouraged or coerced by the government or its agents, then the state action theory applies and the First Amendment rights should be protected, particularly from viewpoint discrimination. Since Adam Schiff, a sitting representative, personally and publicly in his official capacity asked for social media platforms to begin censoring conservative content providers and YouTube thereafter responded and complied to that request, the door was opened for this lawsuit.

The Plaintiffs expect that they will either receive or be denied an emergency injunction, or a restraining order upon Youtube, requiring that their accounts be reinstated. If the lawsuit proceeds as expected, it is anticipated that the legal issues raised in the complaint may finally settle the issues relating to Big Tech’s immunity from lawsuits under the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The implications are immense, and the public deserves to be well informed on the progress of this landmark case.

We will continue to provide updates as litigation proceeds.



https://newspunch.com/fifteen-huge-youtube-creators-file-federal-lawsuit-against-youtube-for-violating-first-amendment/
There is a massive problem with this. The plaintiffs will need to reveal their identities as their jewtube names won't wash. If their material presented over the years had any substance and weight to it, they would have contracts out on them as soon as the days proceedings are filed because the various hit teams would know everything about them. Their survival would speak volumes.

They will also have a very hard time convincing any judge to get a temporary injunction or restraining order, let alone getting it to go to a full hearing. Google will front a legal team loaded with switch hitters who smash .950 all day every day. They will truck so much paper in, it will bog down proceedings for at least a decade. The judge will almost certainly get to the point of saying the legal equivalent of "fuck this shit, get the hell outta here"

How they pitch the case will also determine how things proceed initially. The plaintiffs will need to pitch this as one of censorship and their presence on youtube was for the public interest. The other side will counter with those channels being monetized and thus for profit enterprises, and that's when the IRS starts salivating.
 

Someone_else

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,232
Likes
4,705
You made some good points.
The plaintiffs will need to reveal their identities as their jewtube names won't wash.
Can't their identities be sealed by the court?
The judge will almost certainly get to the point of saying the legal equivalent of "fuck this shit, get the hell outta here"
That may be. Or might the judge order that the Google lawyers only provide the pertinent evidence and any chaff would be contempt of court, with suitable punishments? I'll bet that the lawyers, being "officers of the court", need to follow a judge's orders.
 

Buck

Come On, Man!
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
15,231
Likes
17,343
there should be enough plaintiffs who're ready to expose themselves, if only for the 'notoriety' at the end of the day

people stick their necks out for a chance at the pot of gold, get the suit started and 'they will come'
 

chieftain

Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
2,348
Likes
3,367
Can't their identities be sealed by the court?
In a criminal trial, identities can be suppressed or sealed, in this being a civil matter... I'm not aware of any precedent and Google will want to out these guys.

That may be. Or might the judge order that the Google lawyers only provide the pertinent evidence and any chaff would be contempt of court, with suitable punishments? I'll bet that the lawyers, being "officers of the court", need to follow a judge's orders.
The problem with that is that many lawsuits have occured in the past with supertankers worth of chaff as you put it. I'm not sure a judge could rule in such a manner, as the spin doctors within team Google would be able to conjure up some sort of link, however tenuous, to the case and justify the paper.

there should be enough plaintiffs who're ready to expose themselves, if only for the 'notoriety' at the end of the day

people stick their necks out for a chance at the pot of gold, get the suit started and 'they will come'
The Google team would be counting on the plaintiffs being painted as "gold seekers".
 

Buck

Come On, Man!
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
15,231
Likes
17,343
The Google team would be counting on the plaintiffs being painted as "gold seekers".
of course they would, deplorables the entire lot, but, life isn't just conservatives who've eaten shit over the last few years...lots of liberals don't agree with much of what's going on either

point is, there will be opportunists, some might even play a guitar in their bathing suit in NY, just to chase along with the lawyers, that pot of gold

techies can't hurt us all, some of us can't be hurt...some of us know this, some of us don't care

it's for a pot of gold, even when it isn't

this is 'Merica, everything gets sued...


all right then:
what really concerns me will be any 'out of court settlements' because that will leave our judicial system with no 'case law' to rely upon, in the future, to help prevent any of this non-sense from occurring again
 

chieftain

Gold Chaser
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
2,348
Likes
3,367
what really concerns me will be any 'out of court settlements' because that will leave our judicial system with no 'case law' to rely upon, in the future, to help prevent any of this non-sense from occurring again
That's the $64 trillion question Buck. Should they settle out of court, it immediately destroys any credibility the plaintiffs (and their youtube content) had. It could well be the win-win Google wants.
 

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,701
Likes
105,755
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,701
Likes
105,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
The X22 Report is "one man's opinion". Anything that is said on the report is either opinion, criticism, information or commentary, If making any type of investment or legal decision it would be wise to contact or consult a professional before making that decision.

Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence before making any significant investing decisions.

Episode 2313a - Trump Just Signaled The Economic Trump Card, Right On Schedule

https://rumble.com/vauzj1-episode-2...he-economic-trump-card-right-on-schedule.html

Episode 2313b - Recording Released Of [HB], [BO] Panics, DOJ To Sullivan Dismiss Flynn’s Case

https://rumble.com/vauzo1-episode-2...-hb-bo-panics-doj-to-sullivan-dismiss-fl.html
 
Last edited:

newmisty

Transcending the 5 Elements
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
33,788
Likes
53,373
Location
Qmerica

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,989
Likes
71,761
Location
third cove on the right

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,900
Likes
96,201
Location
Earth
Vote for the vagina, girls!
 

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,989
Likes
71,761
Location
third cove on the right
Yikes! https://t.co/3GLAFDuOXV— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 28, 2020
"I didn't request to meet with Joe. They requested that I meet with Joe. They were putting their entire family legacy on the line. They knew exactly what they were doing."

Tony Bobulinski lays out his meetings with Joe Biden and others in reference to overseas dealings. pic.twitter.com/FyNAJ0e0TM— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) October 28, 2020




----------------------------------------

Not only is Bobulinski destroying the Bidens, he's destroying the media, DOJ, and FBI.— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) October 28, 2020

---------------------------------------
What I’m hearing from #Bobulinski is that Joe Biden poses a grave national security threat. If what this source says is true, he should be serving 20 years in prison, not four in the Oval Office #BidenCrimeFamily— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) October 28, 2020
-----------------------------------
The evidence of corruption against Joe Biden is 100,000 times stronger than anything they fabricated on me and my family and we went through three years of lies and hell because of it.

It’s time to show there’s equal justice under the law and investigate.— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 28, 2020
 

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,989
Likes
71,761
Location
third cove on the right

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
12,989
Likes
71,761
Location
third cove on the right
Hunter Biden's ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski: "I remember looking at Jim Biden and saying how are you guys getting away with this? Aren't you concerned? He looked at me, and he laughed a little bit, and said 'PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.'" pic.twitter.com/IxbND1IbWV— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 28, 2020

-------------


Bobulinski: As a result of my disclosures about the Biden family’s corruption, I’ve gotten death threats. I now have to have a team of former Navy SEALS guarding my family. I can’t go home. But I had to do this because the American people need to know the facts.— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 28, 2020


----------------



Tucker Carlson: “Never in American history have more power centers in this country aligned to kill a legitimate news story in the days before an election. That’s what is happening right now. If you’re looking for a real threat to our democracy, you’re watching it unfold.”— The Columbia Bugle (@ColumbiaBugle) October 28, 2020

.
 

Buck

Come On, Man!
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
15,231
Likes
17,343
BREAKING:
A Federal Prosecutor Ate Dinner Tonight, Will Turn In Early...Film At 11:00
 

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,497
Likes
21,580
It all started 3 years ago tomorrow (which arrives in a little over one hour, Eastern Time).

Post #0001

Q0001.jpg
 

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,900
Likes
96,201
Location
Earth
 

the_shootist

Old Pasty White Guy
Midas Member
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
52,900
Likes
96,201
Location
Earth

Goldhedge

Moderator
Site Mgr
Sr Site Supporter
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
54,701
Likes
105,755
Location
Rocky Mountains

dacrunch

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
6,064
Likes
6,511

SongSungAU

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
10,497
Likes
21,580
Did Bobski say he has Q clearance?
He had it in the past. It didn't sound like he was saying he currently holds Q clearance.

"... I was a naval officer myself and because I held a Q clearance which is the equivalent of a top secret clearance ..."​


Lots of people have top secret clearance. Here's an excerpt from an article USA Today did in 2017:

The government trusted about 4.3 million people with various levels of security clearance as of October 2015, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. These included nearly 2.9 million people at the “confidential” or “secret” level and nearly 1.4 million at the “top secret” level.