"Q's" posts---

[Someone_else]

Oh, yeah. There is something about "conspiracy to commit a crime."

 

[ABC123]

 

[Unca Walt]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The above note from Donald Trump clearly states:

"THEY MUST BE SHOWN."



"...and they are being shown."

 

[Unca Walt]

Switch to Dune:

"And when we have enough, we will change the face of Arrakis."

 

[the_shootist]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The above note from Donald Trump clearly states:

"THEY MUST BE SHOWN."



"...and they are being shown."

There's nothing here he hasn't said before. Yeah, we're seeing more crap being laid down every day by the tyrants currently in power and the people can see it all if only they would free up their minds from the brainwashing of the media, the fake 'health organizations and the tyrannous government and start thinking for themselves.

It's always been up to the people to act...they have always had that power and still do. The trouble I'm having is the last time Americans picked up arms against tyranny was in the 1770s...nothing since. We don't have a very good track record of managing our public servants over the past couple of hundred years. I'm not sure if I have enough confidence that the American people will wake up from their 250 year slumber, grow a set and actually move against what has become a monster sent by Satan to destroy what's left of the USA and bring down the entire planet into a one world order.

 

[Unca Walt]

There's nothing here he hasn't said before. Yeah, we're seeing more crap being laid down every day by the tyrants currently in power and the people can see it all if only they would free up their minds from the brainwashing of the media, the fake 'health organizations and the tyrannous government and start thinking for themselves.

It's always been up to the people to act...they have always had that power and still do. The trouble I'm having is the last time Americans picked up arms against tyranny was in the 1770s...nothing since. We don't have a very good track record of managing our public servants over the past couple of hundred years. I'm not sure if I have enough confidence that the American people will wake up from their 250 year slumber, grow a set and actually move against what has become a monster sent by Satan to destroy what's left of the USA and bring down the entire planet into a one world order.

Not quite true. Men took up arms in that town in? Aw hell... Can't remember the name... and prevented crooked politicians from winning. In the 1940's or 50's.

 

[oldgaranddad]

Not quite true. Men took up arms in that town in? Aw hell... Can't remember the name... and prevented crooked politicians from winning. In the 1940's or 50's.

Athens, Tennessee (1946)

 

[Unca Walt]

Athens, Tennessee (1946)

Thank you, bro.

These heroes are all ex-sojers. THIS is the America I knew... where the Good Guys would chase out the Bad Guys to save the honesty of voting. I weep for that America.

And THIS is a photograph that PROVES it is essential for American citizen to be able to control their own government:

They fired on the cops and politicians until the cops and politicians surrendered and a new local government was formed -- all on the patriot's slate. God bless them.

 

[Uglytruth]

In a 1787 letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson used the phrase "tree of liberty":

I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.1 The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.2

 

[Alton]

Just one more H3RC - Suez photo from a satellite... upper left hand corner...

 

[Studiopaul]

Accidentally on purpose !!??!!??

 

[Goldhedge]

Accidentally on purpose !!??!!??

That does make one wonder....

 

[the_shootist]

Not quite true. Men took up arms in that town in? Aw hell... Can't remember the name... and prevented crooked politicians from winning. In the 1940's or 50's.

I stand corrected. There WAS one time since the 1770's Americans took up arms to fight tyranny on their own soil. Let's face it, other than those two times, we're haven't been known around the world as a people who hold their government very accountable. All this American justice and freedom bullshit has been a show to cover up the what was happening to the government and the country deep under the covers. We've been REALLY good at one thing tho... bombing brown people on the other side of the planet! Wanna go back further? We were told WWII was about freedom ...it wasn't! It was about the central banks keeping a firm hold on the world of debt they had been building while fattening the pockets of the MIC as a bonus.

The US is a paper tiger. One needs to look no further than the millions of obedient mask wearers everywhere!

The time has come to either stand and fight against tyranny or lose our freedom and our lives. Don't count on it happening any time soon though. Like I said, the American people have been neutered and wussified and I'll wager a clad quarter they'll continue to be obedient as long as they get their free stuff. Once their enemy has been defeated and the new world order is in place, the obedient sheep be rounded up and sent to the gulags or just be shot!

For the new world order.....is there a new US flag in our future?

(Don't pay any attention to my whining....I'm just fed up with being porked by the rulers and no one outside of this forum and a few internet yahoos seem to care.).

...and my shoulder hurts from working in the yard

 

[Buck]

at the end of the day, most here are actually in quite the superior position, if ignorance is your neighbor, you already know about it, if you're short on some supplies, you'll take care of it...it maybe tiring a bit, but considering the alternative (waiting for MLB allstar game)

we're so much further down the road than all the rest

relax,
it's good to leave one's guts on the table every now and again, it feels refreshing

and none of us will touch them till you come and take them back...we've got no clean up crew here

 

[the_shootist]

at the end of the day, most here are actually in quite the superior position, if ignorance is your neighbor, you already know about it, if you're short on some supplies, you'll take care of it...it maybe tiring a bit, but considering the alternative (waiting for MLB allstar game)

we're so much further down the road than all the rest

relax,
it's good to leave one's guts on the table every now and again, it feels refreshing

and none of us will touch them till you come and take them back...we've got no clean up crew here

I know buck, I'm just a whiny bitch a little more than usual today. Walt and you are 100% right (as usual). I'm over my moment !

 

[Buck]

i know i was beating my mule the other morning and someone told me, afterwards, i coulda been choking my chiken


what are you gonna do?

 

[the_shootist]

i know i was beating my mule the other morning and someone told me, afterwards, i coulda been choking my chiken


what are you gonna do?

I know what you mean. I was in the supermarket business for many years and our motto was "You can't beat our meat but you can whip our cream!"

 

[the_shootist]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1378097027289088006

 

[Studiopaul]

But wait Israel is our ally !

 

[ABC123]

And why was he texting Dilbert?

 

[Bubble Fat]

It was Wally all along! Always suspect quiet corner cube guy.

 

[Unca Walt]

I'm surprised they didn't end up dizzy!

I'll be honest -- While I am Instrument Rated, I could not make those perfect racetracks. I dunno if you can autopilot them, but if the guy is just steering, he is a fargin super pilot.

 

[Unca Walt]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1378097027289088006

WHAT THE ABSOLUTE FUCKING HELL!!

 

[Studiopaul]

the app when zoomed out looks smooth when zoomed in you can see more deviations. probably not the best accuracy..plus we are being allowed to see these flight paths...im sure there are a lot more that are happening that we can not see.
Watching Europe, middle east etc..was interesting watching flight paths around Hormos straight..the ship was secondary.

 

[oldgaranddad]

WHAT THE ABSOLUTE FUCKING HELL!!

Just like us maybe the Mossad have black hat and white hat factions? I guess the white hats won this battle?

 

[Thecrensh]

Honestly, I don't believe many/most conservative sites either...they're just as likely to spout lies as the lefty sites are. They just spout "righty" lies instead, so people fall for it. I wouldn't be surprised if Gaetz was diddling underage people...boys...to be honest.

 

[Voodoo]

Honestly, I don't believe many/most conservative sites either...they're just as likely to spout lies as the lefty sites are. They just spout "righty" lies instead, so people fall for it. I wouldn't be surprised if Gaetz was diddling underage people...boys...to be honest.

I don't know, he's been pretty good through all this and the fact that he apparently is having to fight this lends him some leeway. But that is the problem with all of this the corruption is so pervasive that you just never know.

 

[TRYNEIN]

 

[Goldhedge]

Digital warriors LOOK AT THE DATA; fools do not ... martingeddes.activehosted.com

Digital warriors
LOOK AT THE DATA;
fools do not

It feels like we are the cusp of profound changes in human society. We are watching the removal of a multi-generational and transnational "supermafia" who have covertly controlled much of our banking, media, religious, academic, industrial, medical, military and other institutions. This has been achieved through secret societies, extreme violence, psychopathic culture, occult practises, systematised paedophilia, and widespread blackmail. A two-tier society has placed an unseen few well above the law, and many into de facto enslavement well below it. The quintessential feature of such "dark power" is its ability to hide itself, often in plain view. My work over the last few years has been to play a small part in shining light into those shadowy places. It would be tempting to frame this essay as being about the arrival of "Q", my role in interpreting that information source, and the challenge that it poses to the power of the mass media. But that would be to put the focus in the wrong place, and perhaps belongs in books to be written once this corruption purge is completed. Instead, I would like to put this work into the context of what I was doing previously, so it can be understood as an ordinary act of empirical research and logical reasoning. My previous professional role was working at the leading edge of telecoms and computer science. I don’t need to boast about my pedigree in that space, it is well enough known and acknowledged. What was special about the work I was doing was that I helped to build bigger "conceptual universes" to understand what unarticulated "thinking limits" were preventing progress. ° ° ° Without delving into unnecessary technical detail, there are multiple fundamental errors in current internet architecture: that networks do "work" ("moving" packets rather than duplicating data); that layers matter more than scopes (it’s both); that emergence is preferable to engineering; that more quantity always causes better quality; that you can distinguish intentional from emergent effects; and that safety cases can be infinitely extrapolated. I may an intellectual pygmy, but I am a damned nimble one, and discovered these things by climbing onto the shoulders of many computer science giants. What this taught me was that there are people who have awards for the creation of the current Internet who don’t actually — deep down — fully understand how it works (or fails). Furthermore, many of the giants looking at these basic problems were previously unaware of each other. My contribution, as the most gymnastic pygmy, was to stand on their shoulders and point them at each other. Good things came to pass as a result of this effort. A community of "radicals" formed who saw the orthodoxy for the constraining folly it is. It was an exercise in uncovering all the naked emperors in distributed computing, and my goodness there are a lot of them. Perhaps my most cherished memory is speaking at a conference after a Stanford computer science professor. What I was presenting was so far ahead of what he was doing that he didn’t understand it, because it was unthinkable to him that he might have anything to learn from me. My speech wasn’t worthy of him listening to — and I watched him arrogantly sit on the front row wallowing in his unconscious ignorance. He was a very well credentialled fool. Because I had no books or awards in telecoms filled with false orthodoxy to recant, and no obsolete academic papers to defend, I had nothing to lose by being curious — and digging deeper and deeper into the rotten conceptual foundations. This made me unpopular in some circles, as you were not meant to challenge the venerated Internet pioneers and their sainthood. But the existence of real working technologies that were "impossible" in the conventional paradigm meant that there was no debate to be had. It wasn’t a "conspiracy theory" that the present Internet is just a crude prototype; there are multiple working real-world technologies out there the prove something vastly better is achievable. A whole industry as vast as telecommunications is founded on fundamental and basic category and conceptual errors. Simple branches of mathematics needed to model supply and demand are missing. The telecoms emperor is a cross between a streaker and a naturist. I had an existence proof of a complete industry founded upon technical insanity. ° ° ° I am telling you this story because what happened next is that I just repeated the same philosophical exercise, but relocated from telecoms to world affairs. A true scientist identifies the current subject matter giants to get the best view, examines all the data, including that which may contradict the hypothesis, and makes rational inferences. The "Q hypothesis", if we are to use scientific terms, is that the global mass media has a single point of control via a network of corrupt intelligence agencies. This enables them to get away with warmongering, drug running, profiteering, genocide, financial fraud, human trafficking and other crimes. The unconscious belief in telecoms was that there was some modest ceiling to how much value you could extract from a given data transmission resource, requiring networks to remain mostly idle. The reality of innovation proved this belief unfounded, and far more yield was possible, even running them in overload. Similarly, in world affairs there is an unconscious belief that there is some innate limit to the scale of crime that can be conceived and executed in a globalised world. An examination of the data, and the role of the mass media in facilitating such crime, quickly showed this to be fallacious — as any totalitarian society proves. But this is not an essay about Q or to justify that conclusion about the scalability of criminal cultures. It is about my own personal journey and experience. All I did was to LOOK AT THE DATA — thousands of Q drops, and hundreds of thousands of messages from the public analysing them and linking them to other hard empirical data. Just as I had no personal stake in the foundations of telecoms being robust or rotten, I likewise had no stake in the Q data being helpful or hopeless. I am just a curious creature who likes to get to the bottom of things. Yet what it did was to plunge me unexpectedly into one of the most contentious issues in modern history. If the "Q hypothesis" is true, then the power of a corrupt global "elite" (really just criminal psychopaths) depends on their control over the mass media not being recognised by the public — since it is key to keeping the masses in ignorance of their subjugation. The media endlessly suggests that "conspiracy theories" are delusional tales of rabid fantasists. This conveniently fits the preferred narrative of a transnational mafia keen to keep its crimes unspoken. The alternative is that very powerful people like to make business plans, and some of those collaborations are criminal and vast. Oddly enough, the same cybernetic theory that says how telecoms networks can scale better also explains how compartmentalisation of criminality can scale. At the end of the day it is all about the imposition of scopes of control over information, and how they form a hierarchy. ° ° ° I had become accustomed in the world of telecoms to seeing very senior people with very big accolades speaking beyond their real competence. So I was prepared for the same to happen in the domain of world affairs. I expected many other intelligent people to take a similar interest in this novel information source, and how it exposed the powerful as frauds. Is "Q" a military intelligence operation to expose a corrupt media industry, or is it not? Who is Q? And why is this identity question verboten in the mass media? It doesn’t take an Ivy League degree in formal logic to figure it out (although I got one anyway just in case). Surely lots of other professional people will also look at the source data and reason about it in this logical way? Yet it didn’t work out that way. Those who had NOT LOOKED AT THE DATA formed their worldview about Q from the very same media that was accused of being institutionally corrupt to the core. Their ignorant colleagues all agreed too with the media’s vehement assertion: those who paid attention to the data Q was offering were "right-wing, extremist, violent, cultist, delusional troublemakers". Nothing more needed to be said, since the coordinated propaganda offered a socially acceptable worldview. However, the Q data doesn’t stand in isolation; it links to a vast network of open source intelligence. So you can easily check for yourself that the financial filings of the Clinton Foundation cannot possibly be for a legitimate charity, and that the media is silent on the matter. The media accusation about Q and the anons (i.e. people like me) doesn’t withstand elementary scrutiny. The failure to seek out data that contradicted the hypothesis — of a trustworthy mass media — made the "mainstream" vulnerable to social engineering and collective delusion. ° ° ° My sin was to do actual political science: to look at source data and to follow it to its logical conclusion, and that conclusion showed the "consensus reality" to be absolute nonsense — just like in telecoms performance engineering. This, however, meant absolute ostracism in my professional world, since it implies that the political beliefs of the tech "liberal" intelligentsia were even more crazy than the architecture of today’s prototype Internet. My former industry associates are happy to denounce everything to do with "QAnon" — an arbitrary label invented by the (corrupt) media with its own semantics — rather than actually LOOK AT THE DATA about corruption. This was brought home to me recently when I pointed out that coerced vaccinations break the Nuremburg rules and are war crimes, only to have that casually dismissed as a "QAnon thing". Such is the power of the propaganda: to cause logical thinking and ethical behaviour to stop once a recognised "good label" or "bad label" is identified. The Q drops started in October 2017, and I first wrote about them in March 2018. It has been a brutal three years, since I refuse to lie by omission. I have merely applied the same ruthless rigour that I adopted in telecoms to this question of corruption in the mass media. I have sought out the fundamental principles and defining frameworks. I have put every idea out in public for challenge by anybody who so chooses, so I can identify any errors. As a result I have been reviled for speaking a simple truth about media corruption that makes many arrogant intellectuals look like fools. Those who declare the "Q hypothesis" to be untrue cannot account for the simplest questions about how the media coordinates and fabricates stories, and ignores many important events. None of them can tell you who Q is, or why the media avoids uncovering this obvious data point. As a consequence, everyone who has NOT LOOKED AT THE DATA (and I repeatedly emphasise for good reason) has now set themselves up for the most epic fall due to their unjustified pride. Scientists look at the data; political scientists add the extra dimension of corrupt power and rigged data. Fools consult with fellow sheep and crooked frauds to form their understanding. ° ° ° In retrospect we can now see the fuller role of the Q drops in the Second American Revolution. The most crucial function of a corrupt mass media is to help engineer the outcome of rigged elections. This maintains a veneer of legitimacy for the criminal ruling class. The 2020 Presidential election was a set-up and sting operation to draw out every corrupt actor involved in this crime — which has been going on for decades, and not just in the United States. Via the Q operation there has been several years of quiet alliance building between the military and a substantial part of the public. These "anons" are the community of radicals who see the nakedness of the orthodox media narrative and the true nature of the constitutional crisis. This tacit alliance now gives the military a necessary space of a few months to run "The Bidan Show" while the clean-up and arrest operation happens in secret, since this involves acts of war by foreign powers, and has global implications. Without the Q operation, the United States would already be in a civil war; "trusting the plan" is essential to keeping Patriots — temporarily denied their legitimate Presidential choice — from pulling out their firearms and rising up. Once the clean-up is over, the global military wakeup operation can begin… and it is going to be epic beyond imagination. Just by looking at the data and telling the truth of what I saw I have become one of the few prominent public analysts on this subject of Q — and the Great Awakening from mass brainwashing via corrupt media. The comprehensive failure of journalists, lawyers, historians, and more to get to grips with Q will be the subject of theses and movies for decades to come. I don’t seek vindication or recognition, just the truth to be in the open and acknowledged. ° ° ° My tiny part in this global corruption purge is as a "digital soldier". This is in the virtual, but I am very much a physical human being. Much of the last few years are best described as "nonstop agony". For instance, I have been libelled by mass media like the BBC, Financial Times, Times, Evening Standard and more. There are moments when I have worried about my personal safety. My health has had a number of knocks from the stress. I have lost friends, and family relationships have strained too. Yet I have refused to defer to the unearned authority of those who have NOT LOOKED AT THE DATA. Whatever pain I have endured for doing real political science is nothing compared to the excruciating horror facing those who mocked LOOKING AT THE DATA. For the assumption that the "media consensus" in world affairs is "sane" is as equally mistaken as the one that the current Internet is the "best possible" and beyond substantial improvement. All it took was to LOOK AT THE DATA and apply the scientific method. If you didn’t, then you may not enjoy the upcoming show as much as the rest of us. It was your choice. Now you get to own it. Yet despite these divisions I believe we will reconcile. It turns out that this wasn’t about me, you, Q, Trump, the Vatican, British Crown, Chinese Communists, or the criminal elite. It is about the trafficked and murdered children. Millions of them. The news is going to be nightmarish. We will all shed tears, as we are human. As the horrific truth comes out, we must find a way to overcome our differences, however hard it may be. Because as a society WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO LOOK AWAY FROM THE DATA for much longer.​

 

[Goldhedge]

About me​

​

I am a British computer scientist based near London.

Martin Geddes On Q

Ten essays on #QAnon by Martin Geddes. Follow my learning journey over two years and make up your own mind.

www.onq.martingeddes.com

You can download a pdf of his writings here: Martin Geddes On Q Version 1.0

I'm finding them 'educational'....as he examines the Q phenomenon from a scientific perspective:

There are essentially two interpretations of the QAnon phenomenon:

• This is “white hat” military intelligence making the greatest drop of insider information to the public ever released, in order to prepare people for #TheStorm.​

​

• You must be out of your mind to pay the slightest attention to any of this. It’s a total fraud and only the gullible and naive would ever fall for it.​

 

[Goldhedge]

"If you want to get away with war-for-profit and mass murder, it is relatively easy if you (surreptitiously) control the mass media. While the media’s role is supposed to be to hold power to account, it has instead become a way for those in power to control the public narrative—in a coordinated fashion. The mass media now manufactures distractions and deceptions, being an agent of a vilely corrupt establishment."

"Q has given activists for justice a focus that they otherwise would have lacked. Q has offered an angry public hope — grounded in practical progress — of a peaceful outcome using the lawful system of civilian and military justice. For the real challenge is not arraigning the traitors, but doing so in a way that doesn't cause society to collapse."

Martin Geddes

 

[the_shootist]

Much too little, much too late. Special 'Trump rules' now being dismantled because he's gone!

 

[WillA2]

Much too little, much too late. Special 'Trump rules' now being dismantled because he's gone!

View attachment 206768

So, if it happens that Trump gets re-elected... then what?

 

[the_shootist]

So, if it happens that Trump gets re-elected... then what?

They won't allow that to happen. They'll bring down the entire system first to avoid seeing Trump back in power

 

[AUnut]

They won't allow that to happen. They'll bring down the entire system first to avoid seeing Trump back in power

So be it.
Hope they understand, once we cross the rubicon, there's no going back.

AUnut

 

[newmisty]

There's nothing here he hasn't said before. Yeah, we're seeing more crap being laid down every day by the tyrants currently in power and the people can see it all if only they would free up their minds from the brainwashing of the media, the fake 'health organizations and the tyrannous government and start thinking for themselves.

It's always been up to the people to act...they have always had that power and still do. The trouble I'm having is the last time Americans picked up arms against tyranny was in the 1770s...nothing since. We don't have a very good track record of managing our public servants over the past couple of hundred years. I'm not sure if I have enough confidence that the American people will wake up from their 250 year slumber, grow a set and actually move against what has become a monster sent by Satan to destroy what's left of the USA and bring down the entire planet into a one world order.

The blind are gaining their vision. It's matter of time(timing)

 

[Goldhedge]

Much too little, much too late. Special 'Trump rules' now being dismantled because he's gone!

Yet Twitter bans Trump and that is OK per the 1st Amendment....?

 

[the_shootist]

So be it.
Hope they understand, once we cross the rubicon, there's no going back.

AUnut

It took me 5 years and a few shekels to prepare but I'm totally ready now and eagerly await that day

 

[the_shootist]

Yet Twitter bans Trump and that is OK per the 1st Amendment....?

Rules for thee, not for me

 

[TRYNEIN]

Yet Twitter bans Trump and that is OK per the 1st Amendment....?

Justice Thomas argues that while private companies aren’t subject to the First Amendment, common carriers are unique to other private businesses in that they do not have the “right to exclude.” Thomas suggests that large tech platforms with substantial market power should be bound by the same restrictions. “If the analogy between common carriers and digital platforms is correct, then an answer may arise for dissatisfied platform users who would appreciate not being blocked: laws that restrict the platform’s right to exclude,” Thomas writes.

Such a restriction would substantially curb tech giants’ ability to moderate content, a proposal that both tech giants and those on the left who want to see more aggressive content moderation online would almost certainly reject.

https://www.protocol.com/bulletins/thomas-scotus-twitter-trump-ban



------------------