• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

Roe v. Wade to be Overturned by SCOTUS!

the_shootist

Politically Gender Neutral
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
81,082
Reaction score
178,200
Kammy will deliver what???

1651619955381.png
 

edsl48

Midas Member
Midas Member
Survivor
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
4,381
Reaction score
9,535
Funny how there has never been a SC leak before but all of a sudden there is and the Democrats are using it as a rallying cry for stimulating voters for the midterm elections. I take particular note that the Democrats are throwing up assorted straw man arguments like the coat hanger thing yet they overlook there will be plenty of States where abortions would still be easily obtained legally. WHat is the big deal? To me this has electioneering written all over it by the Democrats who, once again, will stop at nothing to win elections and also how dumb the average voter is considering abortions will still be legal in many States.
 

Silvergun

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
2,409
Location
Commie-fornia
Government should completely stay out of the legalizing abortion business. Infantacide should be a personal decision; that person must bear the full responsibility for their decision and there should be no laws OR FUNDING of any kind to cover abortions.

That would be my solution

I agree.

The Government made this mess. As poeple mentioned this is one of the best topics for division. The reality is they should not be involved. Just like marriage. Why does the government have marriage licenses and then grants married people with special privledges? As soon as that happens another group of people come out and demand the same privilege's and now you have a fight over gay marriage when they shouldn't be marrying anyone to begin with.

I think just about every issue can be broken down to it being a problem becuause they have expanded their role in our lives. They need to go back to the very basics and limited government. Obviously that is a pipe dream at this point...
 

ZZZZZ

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
22,983
Location
Northern Arizona
Funny how there has never been a SC leak before but all of a sudden there is and the Democrats are using it as a rallying cry for stimulating voters for the midterm elections. I take particular note that the Democrats are throwing up assorted straw man arguments like the coat hanger thing yet they overlook there will be plenty of States where abortions would still be easily obtained legally. WHat is the big deal? To me this has electioneering written all over it by the Democrats who, once again, will stop at nothing to win elections and also how dumb the average voter is considering abortions will still be legal in many States.
Not only would abortion still be legal in at least 15 states, it would be legal right up until 9 months of pregnancy. And it would be "free!, FREE!, FREE!" (taxpayer funded) to lots of women. And since according to Lunatic Leftists, men can get pregnant too, so men would qualify for free abortions too.
.
.
 
Last edited:

Goldbrix

Mother Lode Found
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
22,536
Reaction score
36,029

Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows​

"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft circulated inside the court.
Pro-choice and anti-abortion demonstrators rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court.


By JOSH GERSTEIN and ALEXANDER WARD

05/02/2022 08:32 PM EDT

The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.

The immediate impact of the ruling as drafted in February would be to end a half-century guarantee of federal constitutional protection of abortion rights and allow each state to decide whether to restrict or ban abortion. It’s unclear if there have been subsequent changes to the draft.

No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending. The unprecedented revelation is bound to intensify the debate over what was already the most controversial case on the docket this term.

The draft opinion offers an extraordinary window into the justices’ deliberations in one of the most consequential cases before the court in the last five decades. Some court-watchers predicted that the conservative majority would slice away at abortion rights without flatly overturning a 49-year-old precedent. The draft shows that the court is looking to reject Roe’s logic and legal protections.


A person familiar with the court’s deliberations said that four of the other Republican-appointed justices – Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett – had voted with Alito in the conference held among the justices after hearing oral arguments in December, and that line-up remains unchanged as of this week.

The three Democratic-appointed justices – Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan – are working on one or more dissents, according to the person. How Chief Justice John Roberts will ultimately vote, and whether he will join an already written opinion or draft his own, is unclear.

The document, labeled as a first draft of the majority opinion, includes a notation that it was circulated among the justices on Feb. 10. If the Alito draft is adopted, it would rule in favor of Mississippi in the closely watched case over that state’s attempt to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

A Supreme Court spokesperson declined to comment or make another representative of the court available to answer questions about the draft document.

POLITICO received a copy of the draft opinion from a person familiar with the court’s proceedings in the Mississippi case along with other details supporting the authenticity of the document. The draft opinion runs 98 pages, including a 31-page appendix of historical state abortion laws. The document is replete with citations to previous court decisions, books and other authorities, and includes 118 footnotes.
The appearances and timing of this draft are consistent with court practice.

The disclosure of Alito’s draft majority opinion – a rare breach of Supreme Court secrecy and tradition around its deliberations – comes as all sides in the abortion debate are girding for the ruling. Speculation about the looming decision has been intense since the December oral arguments indicated a majority was inclined to support the Mississippi law.

Under longstanding court procedures, justices hold preliminary votes on cases shortly after argument and assign a member of the majority to write a draft of the court’s opinion. The draft is often amended in consultation with other justices, and in some cases the justices change their votes altogether, creating the possibility that the current alignment on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization could change.

The chief justice typically assigns majority opinions when he is in the majority. When he is not, that decision is typically made by the most senior justice in the majority.

more
Important part " DRAFT OPINION" leaked to the LeftistStreamMedia.
 

Goldbrix

Mother Lode Found
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
22,536
Reaction score
36,029
Not only would abortion still be legal in at least 15 states, it would be legal right up until 9 months of pregnancy. And it would be "free, FREE, FREE" (taxpayer funded) to lots of women. And since according to Lunatic Leftists, men can get pregnant too, so men would qualify for free abortions too.
.
.
Hell, NY passed a law allow live birth babies born to be terminated / MURDERED upon delivery.
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
15,450
Location
On the top shelf.
My gut feeling is that one of the justices leaked the decision. No matter how rabid the clerks are they know if they get caught they will never practice law again. They’d be done. No second chance. Even the most stupid clerk knows that.

A justice is appointed for life. No justice has ever been impeached nor will the court allow the Senate to hold an impeachment of a justice. (It’s a law rivalry thing). If the Senate can impeach one justice they can impeach others. Just look at the last three presidential impeachments. They have become political potato chips, you can’t stop at one.

Also, everyone knows whoever investigates the leak the clerks will be the number one suspects. I would even bet the justice who leaked the decision probably has a clerk ready to become a patsy.

Remember, these people are sick. I would not put it past a justice to frame a clerk for the cause.
 

the_shootist

Politically Gender Neutral
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
81,082
Reaction score
178,200
1651624082180.png
 

the_shootist

Politically Gender Neutral
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
81,082
Reaction score
178,200
1651624189931.png
 

<SLV>

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
6,890
Reaction score
11,887
My gut feeling is that one of the justices leaked the decision. No matter how rabid the clerks are they know if they get caught they will never practice law again. They’d be done. No second chance. Even the most stupid clerk knows that.

A justice is appointed for life. No justice has ever been impeached nor will the court allow the Senate to hold an impeachment of a justice. (It’s a law rivalry thing). If the Senate can impeach one justice they can impeach others. Just look at the last three presidential impeachments. They have become political potato chips, you can’t stop at one.

Also, everyone knows whoever investigates the leak the clerks will be the number one suspects. I would even bet the justice who leaked the decision probably has a clerk ready to become a patsy.

Remember, these people are sick. I would not put it past a justice to frame a clerk for the cause.
An etreme liberal was just added to the court... Leak happens the evening after Bill Clinton has lunch with Biden... have we forgotten the tarmac and Scalia?
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
15,450
Location
On the top shelf.
Since the official SCOTUS decision hasn’t been released, I hope the justices amend the decision so that it prevents any federal legislation crafted by the left is rendered as moot or unconstitutional. That would be the court’s sweetest revenge.
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
20,590
Reaction score
50,438

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains

"YOU GOT THE MESSAGE, MOTHERF***ER": PRO-ABORTION PROTESTER SHOVES PRO-LIFER​

A pro-abortion protester wearing a bike helmet clashed with pro-life protesters on the steps of the United States Supreme Court Monday night.
 

ZZZZZ

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
9,870
Reaction score
22,983
Location
Northern Arizona
Nobody here, but If there ever was a doubt that Hairy Legs Joey is a walking talking demented buffoon, this should convince you.

Jonathan Turley
@JonathanTurley
President Biden made a surprising statement today in describing Roe as protecting the "right to abort a child." Pro-choice advocates often object to the reference to anything other than the "fetus" in debates.
 
Last edited:

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
1651626622833.png
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains

With 63 Potential Leakers, Calls Grow to ‘Figure Out Who Is Responsible’ for SCOTUS Leak​

By Mark Tapscott

May 3, 2022 Updated: May 3, 2022

Supreme Court justices should immediately issue their official opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson following the bombshell leak of a draft opinion in the case that would overturn Roe v. Wade, according to a key figure in recent major congressional judicial battles.

paywall
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
Here's the HUGE protest...

photo_2022-05-03_19-20-01.jpg
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
1651627336191.png
 

Joe King

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
13,467
Reaction score
17,630
Location
Instant Gratification Land
With all the talk of having Congress codify R. v W., I was wondering how that would even be possible. If you have a Court that is saying it is not a Constitutionally secured Right to abort a pregnancy, how could Congress legalize it with a simply majority? Wouldn't that law simply be struck down the first time it gets challenged in Court?

Just because Congress writes a new law, does not mean that law is written stone and cannot be ruled to be unconstitutional.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
GIM Hall Of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
69,514
Reaction score
153,755
Location
Rocky Mountains
interesting point of view

Screen Shot 2022-05-03 at 7.26.01 PM.png
 

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
17,150
Reaction score
98,935
Location
third cove on the right
80443dd3615b2733.jpeg
 

<SLV>

Platinum Bling
Sr Site Supporter
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
6,890
Reaction score
11,887

Tbonz

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
2,937
Reaction score
3,978
Location
Land of the Free
Isn't it interesting that "womens rights," INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS, come into play when it comes to abortion, but the COVID Bull Sh!t makes anyone that doesn't want to take the "vaccine" irresponsible.

People don't have freedom, until it becomes a leftist issue. It's a d@mn shame that all of these liberal @ssholes weren't aborted.

Abortion kills a beating heart, and I for one am grateful my mother knew this and chose LIFE over DEATH.

We are coming up on Mothers Day, THANK YOU MOM and thank you SCOTUS.
 

oldgaranddad

Platinum Bling
Sr Midas Sup +++
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
7,010
Reaction score
15,450
Location
On the top shelf.
What kind of people have the ability to drop everything, go to the Supreme Court and protest at a moment's notice? I don't.
Professional agitators.
 

Cigarlover

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Survivor
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
10,623
Reaction score
22,506
They don't want to swallow
they don't want the guy to pull out
They don't want to go on the pill
They don't want to use a condom or other contraceptive
They just want to kill the baby when they get knocked up.

Maybe they should see a shrink. Seems like they have no concept of personal responsibility
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
20,590
Reaction score
50,438
Nobody here, but If there ever was a doubt that Hairy Legs Joey is a walking talking demented buffoon, this shouldl convince you.

Jonathan Turley
@JonathanTurley
President Biden made a surprising statement today in describing Roe as protecting the "right to abort a child." Pro-choice advocates often object to the reference to anything other than the "fetus" in debates.
But they have been pushing for up to 10 months after birth.......:totally steamed:
 

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Sr Midas Sup +++
Survivor
Mother Lode
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
20,590
Reaction score
50,438
What kind of people have the ability to drop everything, go to the Supreme Court and protest at a moment's notice? I don't.
soros employees
 

Treasure Searcher

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
5,470
Reaction score
5,383
Reducing abortions will affect Planned Parenthood's bottom line. That would reduce the political contributions, it gives to Democrat politicians.
 

arminius

Argentate Bluster
Eagle
Platinum Bling
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
7,831
Reaction score
13,374

the_shootist

Politically Gender Neutral
Eagle
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
81,082
Reaction score
178,200
What a douchewaggle!

1651635884929.png
1651635985736.png
 

Silvergun

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
2,409
Location
Commie-fornia