• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Sheriffs, States and the Supreme Court

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
11,788
Likes
18,891
Location
ORYGUN
#1
Here is a bit of good news !

In the case below that makes the gun sale a state issue Supreme court Judge Scalia Stated:


"We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the State's officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States' officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed. It is so ordered."

Read more at the source:

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/03/sheriffs-states-and-the-supreme-court/
 

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
2,211
Likes
5,397
Location
third cove on the right
#2
Here is a bit of good news !

In the case below that makes the gun sale a state issue Supreme court Judge Scalia Stated:


"We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the State's officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States' officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed. It is so ordered."

Read more at the source:

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/03/sheriffs-states-and-the-supreme-court/


Very key admission right there


US Supreme Court in Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 421:
"There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States .... In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld."





The federal government is not the sovereign for ones who are not United States citizens. The government is the sovereign to corporations or persons it creates. One who is in a position of being the servant cannot question the demands of the master.The government possesses what is called "sovereign immunity" in relation to those it creates.
Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363, 371 (1943)
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
11,788
Likes
18,891
Location
ORYGUN
#3
Another powerful case/decision;

Marbury vs. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
11,788
Likes
18,891
Location
ORYGUN
#5

TRYNEIN

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
2,211
Likes
5,397
Location
third cove on the right
#6
Hmmm, maybe these folks have a chance.....

http://michiganfreedejurestate.us/info/about/

Or not.

Hopefully they are smart enough ( and looks like they might be) to record that 'On The Public Record' at their local county courthouse. Also, record your Remedy for a trespass against your rights.

Then, if anyone tries to violate your rights, you can serve them with proper notice.
 

Usury

Platinum Bling
Platinum Bling
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,102
Likes
3,247
#7
Does anyone really believe TPTB care about 100-200 year old decisions if they are willing to ignore the Constitution and Bill of Rights?