SO IF THE SUPREMES DO NOT HEAR THE BALLOT FRAUD?

[wallew]

Let's say that the Supreme Court decides to not hear the request by Trumps team?

OR WORSE, heard the case and just threw it back to a lower court without ruling?

OR EVEN WORSE, heard the case and said their was no manipulation of the voting system?

THEY WILL ALL BE REMOVED ala ANTHONY SCALIA

That way, regardless of whether they actually rule on it or not, that will be THEIR LAST RULING, as the 'BIDEN ADMINISTRATION' will replace all of them after they are all dead (in their sleep, in their PJ's, on top of their bed covers) while they pack the court with all their buddies.

And their replacements will ALL BE MARXISTS and our country is done. And they will put 100 of them on the court....

just sayin

 

[Goldhedge]

They must rule. It's their last chance to restore the Republic.

 

[Fatrat]

Give the Socialiats a chance, the repukes and demonRats have had their shot at screwing up this country.

 

[917601]

From the spiritual angle, almighty God did allow Trump's three picks to be installed, that has much relevance and meaning....as a mere mortal I can only speculate what our maker is up to. My bet is those appointments, when called upon to act, will do so according to his will. That said, Gold bug Shelton's dismissal and trashing is a disappointment. No idea how it will play out. In my simple mind, her non appointment signals negativity to all things gold....setting up punitive action towards PMs IF Biden gets in.

 

[917601]

All that said, a Biden win will have extreme positive effects on PMs, ( and punitive action against PMs when it pops to never before seen highs), just research history in DEPTH ( timelines) as to what happened in Argentina and Venezuela- they to used rigged voting machines.... Argentina was the America of South America. I found it interesting Sydney mentioned Argentina and Venezuela in her briefing yesterday....a warning as to what will happen to the US if the socialists gain power. Timing will be everything to PM owners.

 

[Casey Jones]

I fully expect them to punt - to refuse to hear it.

Roberts is compromised. That should have been a top priority - take his background apart. Or, if he no likes...he should have been invited to resign.

But it is what it is and we are where we are. IMHO, the Republic is GONE. The process of voting, can no longer be depended on...with whole states, whole contract-companies, out to OVERCOME the preferences of voters.

Now the illegal power grab goes into Medical Tyranny - with endless Martial Law; with the coup government about to block any and all medicine out to fight this bio-weapon launched by the Dems' allies, the Communist Party of China.

ANY thing that smacks of ending the money-printing is blocked and mocked. Anything that challenges these OBVIOUS fraudulent election results, is mocked, and the speaker threatened.

And now, Face-Diaper Hysteria.

While REAL treatments for the virus are blocked...in the Dems' hopes that older voters....DIE.

Nothing is done.

Nothing will be done...until enough people pick up a carbine.

I'm not even certain, at this point, State Secession will be enough.

And I have neither skill nor knowledge nor, at my age, stamina, to launch a revolution against the coup. And I'm not hopeful of those I used to think of, as my fellow "Americans."

 

[917601]

I fully expect them to punt - to refuse to hear it.

Roberts is compromised. That should have been a top priority - take his background apart. Or, if he no likes...he should have been invited to resign.

But it is what it is and we are where we are. IMHO, the Republic is GONE. The process of voting, can no longer be depended on...with whole states, whole contract-companies, out to OVERCOME the preferences of voters.

Now the illegal power grab goes into Medical Tyranny - with endless Martial Law; with the coup government about to block any and all medicine out to fight this bio-weapon launched by the Dems' allies, the Communist Party of China.

ANY thing that smacks of ending the money-printing is blocked and mocked. Anything that challenges these OBVIOUS fraudulent election results, is mocked, and the speaker threatened.

And now, Face-Diaper Hysteria.

While REAL treatments for the virus are blocked...in the Dems' hopes that older voters....DIE.

Nothing is done.

Nothing will be done...until enough people pick up a carbine.

I'm not even certain, at this point, State Secession will be enough.

And I have neither skill nor knowledge nor, at my age, stamina, to launch a revolution against the coup. And I'm not hopeful of those I used to think of, as my fellow "Americans."

Wisdom always calls for patience. Nothing wrong with righteous anger. Good to see many of us can see what is happening but nothing is even close to being decided till the Constitutional process is fulfilled ( Electoral votes counted). Stinking thinking always clouds one's judgement. As for me, Trump is President until he is not ( Jan 20th 2021 or 2025).

 

[Buck]

Stinking thinking always clouds one's judgement

and that is being provided, daily, by the MSM, false narratives, obfuscations, outright lies...

I do think of the sheep who can't think for themselves, they're being led to the slaughterhouse and there are a few, across the country, who are licking their chops at the thought of the final stick, being tossed into the last remaining wheel of justice


and we're so broken, from where I sit, ALL JUDGES are suspect, as to their allegience to the Oath they took to protect the Constitution

 

[wallew]

While I'm sure we all HOPE that letting this play out and then we will all find out the truth.

WHAT IF IT DOES NOT? What if they can't actually decide who won each state? Then it goes to congress and the Republicans are saying they would win that, but what if it was to come down to a tie? IE 25 D's and 25 R's vote and I don't know the law that explains how or if, that any other votes will be allowed to break that tie?

And the Supreme Court can choose to NOT RULE on this at all and just kick it back to what ever court, the ruling came from. I've actually read a couple of articles that do not bode well. For example the new justice? She ruled FOR a state governor saying they had the right to impose controls on the populace because of COVID (this year btw).

It seems we ARE bound for Civil War 2.

 

[mtnman]

While I'm sure we all HOPE that letting this play out and we all find the truth.

WHAT IF IT DOES NOT? What if they can't actually decide who won each state? Then it goes to congress and the Republicans are saying they would win that, but what if it was to come down to a tie? IE 25 D's and 25 R's vote and I don't know the law that explains how or if, that any other votes will be allowed to break that tie?

And the Supreme Court can choose to NOT RULE on this at all and just kick it back to what ever court, the ruling came from. I've actually read a couple of articles that do not bode well. For example the new justice? She ruled FOR a state governor saying they had the right do impose controls on the populace (this year btw).

It seems we ARE bound for Civil War 2.

Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)
PreambleArticle IArticle IIArticle IIIArticle IVArticle VArticle VIArticle VIIAmendment IAmendment IIAmendment IIIAmendment IVAmendment VAmendment VIAmendment VIIAmendment VIIIAmendment IXAmendment XAmendment XIAmendment XIIAmendment XIIIAmendment XIVAmendment XVAmendment XVIAmendment XVIIAmendment XVIIIAmendment XIXAmendment XXAmendment XXIAmendment XXIIAmendment XXIIIAmendment XXIVAmendment XXVAmendment XXVIAmendment XXVII
The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;-The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;-The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President-The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

 

[Cigarlover]

What if the courts are all corrupt?
What if the media is just a propaganda arm from the left?
What if elections are now rigged for the left forever?
What if politicians are all corrupt?
What if our next president is owned by China and he likes to diddle little girls?
What if his sons a drug addict that also likes to play with underage girls and sell out his country?
What if obama did fundamentally change America?
What if obama put key people into key positions in all government organizations to defend his takeover?

Game over. Check mate.

 

[cameo]

They must rule. It's their last chance to restore the Republic.

I think America is FINISHED as it is !! It appears it`s all downhill from here until it hits rock bottom ............ and thanks to the DEMONCRATS, LIBERALS .... and GEORGE SOROS , our lives as we once knew them , are FINISHED !!! There is only one solution at this point, but I`d very likely be put in PRISON for suggesting it, so I won`t !!!

 

[wallew]

mtnman,

You make my case for me...

a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President-The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President;

SO let's say that one of two scenarios unfold when no state can or will certify the results of their election, regardless the reason.

A) The president's fate will be decided by the congress, except all that means is each state gets ONE vote for the president. As it stands now, the R's have a lead of two or three votes, but lets go with the fact that given the dems have gone all in on their choice and are able to get the number of votes for BOTH candidates even - ie 25/25.

B) Which causes it to fall to the Vice President whose election choice fall the the Senate. Again, right now, the R's are ahead, but Georgia is going to elect two Senators in Jan? So once again, it could end up 50/50. and no Vice President is elected to pick the President.

SO that is when things will get ugly.

Someone, HELL ANY ONE, PLEASE point out what I've missed.

I cannot believe this is where our country has gotten to now. Where lying, cheating and stealing like you are a South American dictator? That means that those people consider the rest of us part of THEIR BANANA REPUBLIC.

And that does NOT address the part where one side of states or the other could bring all of this to a screeching halt by refusing to participate, thereby denying the other side a quorum, thereby HALTING the choosing process?

Then what? I suspect that if we have 25 states that are only willing to agree with the D's and the other 25 are only willing to agree with the R's then we are ALL screwed.


This all reminds me of how we get to 'The Turners Diary', more from a theory stand point, not because I know this is what will happen, nor am I saying I know WHAT will happen. Just scary sheet that does not make any sense to me.

 

[historyrepete]

What if the courts are all corrupt?
What if the media is just a propaganda arm from the left?
What if elections are now rigged for the left forever?
What if politicians are all corrupt?
What if our next president is owned by China and he likes to diddle little girls?
What if his sons a drug addict that also likes to play with underage girls and sell out his country?
What if obama did fundamentally change America?
What if obama put key people into key positions in all government organizations to defend his takeover?

Game over. Check mate.

If all this is true, we'll find ourselves right here. A once great country,a beacon of light to the world, had been corrupted and is being taking over. Frankly without a fight. And here we are

 

[917601]

While I'm sure we all HOPE that letting this play out and then we will all find out the truth.

WHAT IF IT DOES NOT? What if they can't actually decide who won each state? Then it goes to congress and the Republicans are saying they would win that, but what if it was to come down to a tie? IE 25 D's and 25 R's vote and I don't know the law that explains how or if, that any other votes will be allowed to break that tie?

And the Supreme Court can choose to NOT RULE on this at all and just kick it back to what ever court, the ruling came from. I've actually read a couple of articles that do not bode well. For example the new justice? She ruled FOR a state governor saying they had the right to impose controls on the populace because of COVID (this year btw).

It seems we ARE bound for Civil War 2.

As for the Supremes not hearing the case....two thoughts 1) we survived Nobamas 8 years 2) maybe we will have an opportunity to use everything gained in those times...

 

[Casey Jones]

I think America is FINISHED as it is !! It appears it`s all downhill from here until it hits rock bottom ............ and thanks to the DEMONCRATS, LIBERALS .... and GEORGE SOROS , our lives as we once knew them , are FINISHED !!! There is only one solution at this point, but I`d very likely be put in PRISON for suggesting it, so I won`t !!!

Not only put in prison...if you began it, you'd be slaughtered.

A successful reprisal takes resources that we don't have. Starting with, organization. Then, on to a home-turf.

No...although there's still a few minutes left on the clock...I think it's a safe prediction, it's Game Over.

For the nation. What of those of us who are thinking past that? The East Germans and Cubans, fled.

Where do we flee? How do we get there, and take at least some of our money/wealth?

 

[Casey Jones]

If all this is true, we'll find ourselves right here. A once great country,a beacon of light to the world, had been corrupted and is being taking over. Frankly without a fight. And here we are

Exactly where we're at.

Not unlike Wiemar Germany. Only a few street skirmishes, and suddenly, Corporal Hitler, ex-con, becomes Chancellor.

It's remarkably easy to conquer a nation - all you need is time, dedication, an ability to attract large numbers of members...the lure of Free Schitte is one way, especially if you wrap the plunder in a morally-validating Narrative. "Fair." "Reparations." "Past Injustice."

The Frankfurt School has been going at it for a hundred years; and now they've won. Their victory will be shorter than their campaign, though, as it all comes down in famine and chaos.

 

[D-FENZ]

Let's say that the Supreme Court decides to not hear the request by Trumps team?

OR WORSE, heard the case and just threw it back to a lower court without ruling?

OR EVEN WORSE, heard the case and said their was no manipulation of the voting system?

THEY WILL ALL BE REMOVED ala ANTHONY SCALIA

That way, regardless of whether they actually rule on it or not, that will be THEIR LAST RULING, as the 'BIDEN ADMINISTRATION' will replace all of them after they are all dead (in their sleep, in their PJ's, on top of their bed covers) while they pack the court with all their buddies.

And their replacements will ALL BE MARXISTS and our country is done. And they will put 100 of them on the court....

just sayin

Listen to you...

You don't even bother to vote, but then fret about how it will all turn out... Even start a thread about it. WTF is wrong with you?

And now you're worried about how they are counting ours? Seriously?

Yeah we're fucked.

 

[hammerhead]

What if the courts are all corrupt?
What if the media is just a propaganda arm from the left?
What if elections are now rigged for the left forever?
What if politicians are all corrupt?
What if our next president is owned by China and he likes to diddle little girls?
What if his sons a drug addict that also likes to play with underage girls and sell out his country?
What if obama did fundamentally change America?
What if obama put key people into key positions in all government organizations to defend his takeover?

Game over. Check mate.

What do you mean, what if. You nailed it.

 

[Casey Jones]

This all reminds me of how we get to 'The Turners Diary', more from a theory stand point, not because I know this is what will happen, nor am I saying I know WHAT will happen. Just scary sheet that does not make any sense to me.

The Turner Diaries was eerily insightful - probably one more reason why the Leftist mediuh were so quick, so universal, as to dismiss it as trash. Yes, there's aspects of racism, or at least of dismissal of some groups by race - but that's backed up by IQ score averages by race. And the scenario presented, is what we are seeing NOW - as some are promoted, put above us, by either racial identity or their loud advocacy of racialism.

The writer's idyllic presentation of an all-white Homeland (my term) comes across as fantasy - until you consider the difference, say, between Copenhagen and Mogadishu. Between Amsterdam and Cape Town. Between Bern and Chicago's South Side.

It doesn't matter. We won't be allowed to make such lands - too many whites suffer Stockholm Syndrome, and the racialists control most of the government now. We go down, into the Dark Ages of tribal warfare and starvation; and which tribe/race emerges, in 200 years, is really just a flip of the coin. Just chance, and unconnected circumstances.

 

[wallew]

D-Fenz,
As I've told any one who asks why I don't vote.
BECAUSE IT NEVER MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE.

Are you saying that voting MADE a difference this year? I DO NOT. It's been this way since AT LEAST 2008, probably MUCH EARLIER THAN THAT.

Again, please tell me I'm wrong.
PLEASE.

But we both know I'm not.
As a country we've been going down this rat hole for a long time.

I used to try to bring this to peoples attention until I went to gunsmithing school. After that, it became crystal clear that NO ONE gives a rat shit about what ANY OF US THINK.

They pretended to play the game as long as THEY WON. And A LOT OF FOLKS went along with that even when their side lost. OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

Tell me what the definition of insanity is:
Doing the same thing over and over again, EXPECTING A DIFFERENT RESULT.
Please tell me why people do that. I stopped DOING EXACTLY THAT.

We have been given one of two choices. I don't give a crap if you are an R or a D, it does not matter. You can vote and then one side or the other is disappointed with the results. NOT THIS YEAR.

THESE DAYS, only one side is willing to pull out all the stops and do everything in their power to grab and keep power. And it ain't the R's.

Go ahead, tell me I'm wrong.

Because THIS YEAR, THE RULES OF THE GAME CHANGED. I was not given a vote in that change.

WERE YOU?

 

[gnome]

Which of the 24+ lawsuits do you think might make it to SCOTUS?

 

[wallew]

I wish I knew.

A couple of articles I've read in the past few days, and I'm paraphrasing the crap out of it, but basically they said that as of now, the Supreme Court justices do not want a case that will cause them to pick the winner of the election.

Understandable, but I felt that was the justices job? I could be wrong.

And think about it.

Regardless of which side they would chose, the other side will go ballistic, even suicidal, which in some respects, the left has already proven they ARE WILLING to burn you and your family to the ground. The right, not so much. They won't even stand for US PROTECTING OURSELVES (uh, right of self defense IS a constitutional protection for now).

If the supreme court justices take ANY of these cases, I will be surprised, because they don't want the 'blood of the nation' on their hands BECAUSE of any decision they make.

Hope that clears it up a little. Or not.

 

[ToBeSelfEvident]

The Supreme Court just made Circuit Court reassignments:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx

note:
MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh
WI - Amy Coney Barrett
PA - Samuel A. Alito
GA - Clarence Thomas

 

[Ensoniq]

Unlike the “lock Hillary up” or the invisible Durham report, or the any number of wait for Qs plan to be revealed

We are on a clock

Just a few more weeks and we’ll see. I can wait that long

 

[nickndfl]

Stock up on preps now.

 

[wallew]

we already did all that for the past two months ago...

stacked it deep and wide on several fronts

 

[Alton]

we already did all that for the past two months ago...

stacked it deep and wide on several fronts

Yep.

 

[Casey Jones]

I wish I knew.

A couple of articles I've read in the past few days, and I'm paraphrasing the crap out of it, but basically they said that as of now, the Supreme Court justices do not want a case that will cause them to pick the winner of the election.

Understandable, but I felt that was the justices job? I could be wrong.

And think about it.

Regardless of which side they would chose, the other side will go ballistic, even suicidal, which in some respects, the left has already proven they ARE WILLING to burn you and your family to the ground. The right, not so much. They won't even stand for US PROTECTING OURSELVES (uh, right of self defense IS a constitutional protection for now).

If the supreme court justices take ANY of these cases, I will be surprised, because they don't want the 'blood of the nation' on their hands BECAUSE of any decision they make.

Hope that clears it up a little. Or not.

They're not there to pick a winner. They're to challenge the legal validity of various states' slates of Electors.

Once they disqualify Electors in states with fraud-filled elections, it will pass to each State. States choose Electors, and aside from State laws, they, the Legislatures, can choose Electors as they see fit. They can recertify, by fiat...that will again be challenged, but probably not go anywhere.

They can have NO electors certified. I would have to read up on whether there's a quorum count required in the EC; but if there is no quorum, or if the EC is deadlocked for whatever reason, the election goes into the House of Representatives.

Which Botox Nan may be trying to engineer anyway.

But the Stuporemes would be "picking the winner" only in the mouths of propagandists and in the dim, dank braincases of Circle-D voters.

 

[wallew]

YES you need a quorum. I believe it's 2/3rd of the House if it is for electoral college votes being counted.

After that, the will still need a quorum (again 2/3rds of each states single representative?) so that each state will get ONE vote and the House will vote a second time (total of 50 votes cast).

What could POSSIBLY go wrong with any of that?

UH, one set of states (D o R) don't show and NO QUORUM is possible, then it goes to the Senate.

Pretty much the same rules.

Need a 2/3 quorum and you have to have 51 votes for your candidate before they can declare a winner.

Which is to say, they will have a very hard time getting there. If they can get there at all.

CWII starts about here.

 

[Casey Jones]

My question was over the EC composition itself. If, say, 46 states seat Electors, and four do not...is a vote by the body on the date specified, valid?

 

[SongSungAU]

YES you need a quorum. I believe it's 2/3rd of the House if it is for electoral college votes being counted.

After that, the will still need a quorum (again 2/3rds of each states single representative?) so that each state will get ONE vote and the House will vote a second time (total of 50 votes cast).

What could POSSIBLY go wrong with any of that?

UH, one set of states (D o R) don't show and NO QUORUM is possible, then it goes to the Senate.

Pretty much the same rules.

Need a 2/3 quorum and you have to have 51 votes for your candidate before they can declare a winner.

Which is to say, they will have a very hard time getting there. If they can get there at all.

CWII starts about here.

If a quorum fails to vote, the Senate can, by motion, direct its sergeant at arms to compel the
attendance of absent Senators or even to arrest absentees in order to establish a quorum. The
Senate rarely finds it necessary to take this step.

https://www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/577d2a5e-2b47-4045-95fa-a76398e41461.pdf

 

[wallew]

Yeah, but if they are NOT in the state or even in the country?

One does not know the lengths these people will go to when they want to overturn everything this country stands for.

 

[oldgaranddad]

No State court or election official is going to "be the one" that took the win away from Biden so Trump will "lose" every time in the States. I don’t like that any more than most of you do.

It's in the Supreme Court where this situation gets settled. Either the results stand, or the Supreme Court tosses them out. If the evidence is what it is purported to be then I would say there is a good chance how this plays out. Just my wild ass guess.

1. "Who won?" Case goes to the Supreme Court.

2. The Supreme Court dumps the problem on the House of Representatives. SCOTUS is famous for punting even with certain jurists on the court with reason to give Biden a taste of Karma.

3. One state, one vote for President; Trump has 30 States, Biden has 20.

4. Trump wins! But not so fast.

5. If those 20 states refuse to vote, then we still don't have a winner (see the 12th Amendment for details).

6. Vote now goes to the Senate where one of the VP candidates is elected President until the House votes.

7. President Mike Pence

This will be a mess way after January 20th unless this Kraken evidence is what it is cracked up to be. Then it will be the Gitmo show.

 

[Casey Jones]

With Bidet flushing us down...with Magic Money Theory, and Stoodint Lones abolished with stroke of the pen...and Reparations for Awl...Americans, or not even, who were never slaves, get "reparations" from whites who didn't own slaves, many whose families were not even IN this country...

Do that a few times, and people are going to get the idea: Work is for suckers. PLUNDER is the way to live. Those who would be fleeced, will quit or slow down. Those who get the booty, will just walk off jobs.

Then, as the ghettos explode with drugs, bling, and idiocy...the real slaughter starts.

Those do not bode well for an economy that depends on production and work.

 

[Casey Jones]

Once people get REALLY hungry...Bidet and HerAss will discover the foolhardiness of stealing an election.

They'll learn what I learned long ago...the mistake of Salvador Allende in Chile.

A plurality, even if legally a win, is not a majority. A stolen election only makes hard feelings for the future.

And the people can rise; and so can the military. As Augusto Pinochet demonstrated.

 

[chieftain]

No State court or election official is going to "be the one" that took the win away from Biden so Trump will "lose" every time in the States. I don’t like that any more than most of you do.

It's in the Supreme Court where this situation gets settled. Either the results stand, or the Supreme Court tosses them out. If the evidence is what it is purported to be then I would say there is a good chance how this plays out. Just my wild ass guess.

1. "Who won?" Case goes to the Supreme Court.

2. The Supreme Court dumps the problem on the House of Representatives. SCOTUS is famous for punting even with certain jurists on the court with reason to give Biden a taste of Karma.

3. One state, one vote for President; Trump has 30 States, Biden has 20.

4. Trump wins! But not so fast.

5. If those 20 states refuse to vote, then we still don't have a winner (see the 12th Amendment for details).

6. Vote now goes to the Senate where one of the VP candidates is elected President until the House votes.

7. President Mike Pence

This will be a mess way after January 20th unless this Kraken evidence is what it is cracked up to be. Then it will be the Gitmo show.

As it stands, this is the most probable course for this circus to run.

 

[Casey Jones]

As it stands, this is the most probable course for this circus to run.

I am not sure of the Constitutionality of a "temporary" President. Pence has a term, same as Trump; and that term is over on January 20.

Failing the EC's ability to vote, the House of Representatives MUST vote on a President from among the choices, and in the order set out in the Constitution. Now Botox Nan, being an old, silly, stupid bitch, may think she can be Interim President. She cannot and if she tries, she will need arrest and prosecution.

The House votes. They fail, they have failed their duty, and no one is President. Which would be better than how the partisan House will vote.

 

[nickndfl]

If SCOTUS does not clean up the mess then it's game over. It's probably been out of the people's control for awhile, but we were not aware of it until Trump exposed the treasonous hipocracy.

 

[SongSungAU]

I am not sure of the Constitutionality of a "temporary" President. Pence has a term, same as Trump; and that term is over on January 20.

Failing the EC's ability to vote, the House of Representatives MUST vote on a President from among the choices, and in the order set out in the Constitution. Now Botox Nan, being an old, silly, stupid bitch, may think she can be Interim President. She cannot and if she tries, she will need arrest and prosecution.

The House votes. They fail, they have failed their duty, and no one is President. Which would be better than how the partisan House will vote.

Excerpt from AMENDMENT XII:

And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President-The person having the greatest number of votes as VicePresident, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States_of_America_1992