• Same story, different day...........year ie more of the same fiat floods the world
  • There are no markets
  • "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

State Seizes Seven Children — Because Parents Had Legal Mineral Supplement

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
13,484
Likes
22,705
Location
ORYGUN
#1
The forfeiture laws allow the gov. to steal/seize, your belongings without a crime being committed & the CPS now seizes children at will.

This is KIDNAPPING UNDER THE COLOR OF AUTHORITY.

Monday, 19 January 2015

The treatment is called Miracle Mineral Solution, and one couple that bought it learned that a miracle is necessary today — to keep the government out of your life. Because that couple, Hal and Michelle Stanley, have just had their children seized for owning that product, even though it is reported to be a legal mineral supplement. Natural News has the story:

Yesterday, government thugs in Hot Springs, Arkansas raided and searched the home of a couple who were in possession of a simple mineral supplement called Miracle Mineral Solution.

Law enforcement officers of Garland County, Arkansas served a search warrant on the Stanley home — yes, possession of a legal, medicinal mineral supplement is now grounds for being searched by the government — where they took the family's seven children by force.

The scene that Monday, January 12, was a frightening one. “‘Policemen here, policemen here,’ Hal Stanley pointed, standing on his front porch. ‘Over here, on the side roads full of policemen,’” reported ArkansasMatters.com. The site continued, “Stanley opened his door Monday afternoon to find a warrant waiting for him and his home surrounded by State and Garland County agents. ‘It said we're here to search your house,’ Stanley explained. Hal and his wife Michelle were kept outside for hours while officers searched the home with their seven children inside.”

The Stanleys aren’t accustomed to police contact, either. Hal says they’ve never had problems with the law — that he has never had a speeding ticket. In fact, he states that even beer and liquor are off limits in his home.

The same cannot be said of government intrusion, however. During the search of the Stanley’s residence, an ambulance was brought to the scene, and each of their children was examined. They were found healthy, and their living conditions were judged excellent. As one of the agents on the scene put it, Michelle tells us, “Oh, this is nice and your kids are great.” This gave the couple hope that this would be the end of it.

It was not to be. At approximately 9:30 p.m. January 12, the state showed up again. Reports WND.com, quoting Michelle, “Eventually ‘6 intimidating brute looking males and 1 DHS [Department of Human Services] female all lined up in our den to tell us they would be taking our kids into their custody for 72 hours.’”

Yet the children are still in the state’s custody more than a week later. Not surprisingly, the DHS would not comment on the case except to confirm the children had been seized.

All of this, ostensibly, is over the Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS), which Hal says he readily would have admitted possessing and would have turned over to the authorities, if they’d only asked. Moreover, while the substance — which has been billed as having ameliorative effects in cases of multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s — has not been approved by the FDA for human consumption, Hal says only he has taken it and that they generally use it to purify water for their garden.

Whatever the case, the Stanley children’s robust health attests to the care they receive. And as for any notion that having a “dangerous chemical” in the home justifies the government’s actions, WND.com related a good point, writing:

At a website called Medical Kidnap one reader, Jacquie Trump, noted that government authorities, under the standard used against the family, should lose their own children, because “there are dangerous chemicals in their own homes.”

“Bleach, draino, toilet bowl cleaner, tylenol, stain, varnish, glues and the list goes on and on. It is criminal that this gestapo organization can break into your home and terrorize anyone at anytime over anyone reporting anything.”

This is yet another reason why many say the MMS angle was just a pretext, that the real reason for the children’s seizure was the Stanleys’ politically incorrect lifestyle. As Natural News also wrote:

This is also a war against home schooling because the couple's children are all being home schooled.

The Stanley family is not just into home schooling; they're also into preparedness, natural medicine, home gardening and all the other essential life skills that the tyrannical government in America is trying to crush or outlaw.

This suspicion that there was an ideological motive was only reinforced by a young deputy who, when asked by the Stanleys who made the judgment to seize the children, said that he did and that he was “proud of the decision.”

Yet there may be even more to the case. As The New American (TNA) reported in December:

Every time CPS [or DHS, in the Stanleys' case] seizes a child, it gets money from the federal government.

Lots of money.

And critics have warned that this has a corruptive effect.

TNA then quoted New York Times best-selling author Dr. Joseph Mercola, who wrote in 2011:

Did you know that the money funneled to states and child protective services actually encourages them to accuse you of child abuse and even murder, and to take your children, even if you're not guilty, and even though they have absolutely no proof that you harmed your child?

Horrendous as it sounds, it's true: child abuse has become a business — an industry of sorts — that actually pays states to legally abduct your children and put them up for adoption!

Yet the story gets even worse. Quoting Michael Minkoff, a father who alleges his kids were unjustly taken by CPS, we also wrote, “Likening many American local governments to the Chinese regime — which has been accused of stealing children to profit from selling them for adoption — he levels a serious charge: CPS standards for seizing children aren’t just governed by whether they’re abused, but also whether they’re ‘marketable.’” Minkoff then related:

While we were in LA fighting to get our children back, a little black boy was beaten to death by his step-father. Neighbors had called CPS six times over the course of a few months. No one ever showed up.

Do you know how many calls it took for someone to show up and take our beautiful white baby twin girls? One call. And CPS took them on the basis of one person’s testimony. And we were assumed guilty from the start. Three months later, the case was dismissed and not a single claim was upheld, yet LA County got three months worth of Federal money out of our kids, and so far, they got it with impunity. In fact, if it hadn’t been for God’s grace and good lawyers, we might have been fighting for much longer to no avail.

And as with the children of Cleave and Erica May Rengo, whose case TNA also reported on last year, the Stanley kids fit the CPS/DHS profile of the “adoptable,” money-making child: They’re white, healthy, and some are quite young.

Whatever the state’s motivation, Michelle Stanley characterizes the government’s actions in no uncertain terms. In an e-mail released by Health Impact News she said, “The DHS has come and stolen our kids from us under the guise of ‘protecting our children.’”

Source: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...il&utm_term=0_8ca494f2d2-a3c5da8869-282942837
 

Bigjon

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
2,352
Likes
2,223
#3
http://www.broadmind.org/uploads/AMY_FINAL_CLAIM_-_AC_v_DFCS__1_.doc


IN THE CHIASSON COURT; a court of record
AT PAULDING COUNTY COURTHOUSE
STATE OF GEORGIA, U.S.A.
i; a woman claim; all herein be true;
my word is my bond;


[TABLE="width: 938"]
[TR]
[TD]i; aimee-laura: LeBoeuf [Chiasson]; a.k.a. ‘Aimee Chiasson’; a woman; aggrieved; wronged; harmed;

Claimant;
v;

Sharon Hill; a woman; and; SHARON HILL; A PERSON; DIRECTOR; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES (‘DFCS’); and; Keith Horton; a man; and; KEITH HORTON; A PERSON; COMMISSIONER; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES (‘DHS’); and; Tabitha Burrell; a woman; and; TABITHA BURRELL; A PERSON; CASE MANAGER; SUPERVISOR; DFCS AGENT; and; Joseph Justice; a man; and; JOSEPH JUSTICE; A PERSON; SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (‘SAAG’); DFCS AGENT; and; Jennifer Carreras; a woman; and; JENNIFER CARRERAS; A PERSON; GUARDIAN AD LITEM; DFCS AGENT; and; Deborah Bickers; a woman; and; DEBORAH BICKERS; A PERSON; ‘CASA’; DFCS AGENT; and; Angie Chandler Wilbanks; a woman; and; ANGIE CHANDLER WILBANKS; A PERSON; FOSTER CARE MANAGER SUPERVISOR; DFCS AGENT; and; Lindsey Collier; a woman; and; LINDSEY COLLIER; A PERSON; FOSTER CARE CASE MANAGER; DFCS AGENT; and; Tamra Bennett; a woman; and; TAMRA BENNETT; A PERSON; ‘SSCM’; DFCS AGENT; and; All Principals and/or Agents of DFCS; Lawfully served by way of Notice to Sharon Hill; and; All Principals and/or Agents of DHS Lawfully served by way of Notice to Keith Horton; and;

Each Unnamed Wrongdoer (1-99); and;
EACH UNNAMED WRONGDOER (1-99);

Wrongdoers;
[/TD]
[TD])
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)[/TD]
[TD]


Claimant Case No: 70131710000078579804
(Certified by way of USPS: UPU Treaty Applies)

Notice to Officers of the Court: Upon penalty for Trespass upon the Case’: this is a common law suit in a ‘Court of Record’: 1) the above case number must be the primary case number recorded upon all documents in this case; and all referenced cases hereafter; and pressed upon the record; regardless of any other numbers used by the Clerk of Court; or other; for internal department management; or other purposes; 2) the style in which this Claim is made may not be altered in any way and; at no time does ‘Claimant’ consent to be restyled as a ‘Plaintiff’; or other; or to have this ‘Claim’ be restyled as a ‘Complaint’; govern yourself accordingly... g0d save you;

Similar to a ‘Counterclaim’ upon Case No’s:
13JV10188;13JV10189;13JV10190;13JV10191


In Re: a Tort; in Original Jurisdiction of man;

Amount per Wrongdoer: (See Attached True Bill)


March 21, 2014; 9:00 AM EDT
Heard Before Magistrate: Sandra W. Miller; a Trustee of: the People; man;
Room 2106; Paulding County Courthouse

in this court of record; at common law; trial by jury; by right of man; guaranteed; all rights reserved; none waived;

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
CLAIMS: tORT; TRESPASS; and ORDER FOR default judgment to
RESTORE PROPERTY; AND COMPENSATION;
COMES NOW; i; Aimee; a woman; in this ‘Court of Record’; at common law; aggrieved; wronged; harmed; Claimant; and Order Clerk of Court to enter Default Judgment; for each Claim; signed by the attending Magistrate; upon Wrongdoers; each and all of them; Named or Unnamed; for the


following Claims; proved and seasoned by Wrongdoer(s)’ confession and acquiescence; for Wrongs upon i; a woman; and my property; such Wrongs caused by Wrongdoer(s) upon i; without verified claim or right or authority; with proper Compensation to i; as claimed within the True Bill attached to this my Claims:

i; a woman; Aimee; claim; conusance; propriety; of this; my case; and all other cases referred to herein; and;

i; a woman; Aimee; claim; i; and my property; do not exist by the creation of the legislature of the State of Georgia; or the pleasure of the State of Georgia; nor am subject to any statute of the State of Georgia; including but not limited to Chapter 11 of Title 15 of the Official Code of Georgia; or other; and;

i; a woman; Aimee; do not appear; before my ‘Court of Record’; as a ‘Person’; citizen; subject; or within any limitations or disabilities of statutes or codes; rather as man; by right; with all rights reserved; and;

i; a woman; Aimee; claim; i did offer you; Sharon Hill; and; Keith Horton; and; all other Wrongdoers; Noticed by way of Notice to each of you; at each of your Offices; all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; the opportunity to settle this matter privately with i; within twenty-one (21) days of my first Notice of Claim(s); and;
i; a woman; Aimee; claim; that you; Sharon Hill; and; Keith Horton; and; all other Wrongdoers; Noticed by way of Notice to each of you; at each of your Offices; all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; did acquiesce to each and all of my Claims; and associated Compensation; by tacit procuration; and;
i; a woman; Aimee; claim; you; a woman; Sharon Hill; and; you; a man; Keith Horton; together with all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; do continue to Trespass upon i; a woman; in naked possession of i; a woman's property; without right; without [verified] claim; without authority; and;
i; a woman; Aimee; require; demand; you; a woman; Sharon Hill; and; you; a man; Keith Horton; together with all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; restore to i; i; a woman's property; shown in exhibit A; and; exhibit B; and; exhibit C; and; exhibit D; now; immediate; and;
i; a woman; Aimee; require; demand; you; a woman; Sharon Hill; and; you; a man; Keith Horton; together with all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; deliver in person; i; a woman's property; at the location from which you caused said property to be removed; commonly known as: 1238 Highway 652; Raceland; Louisiana State; to i; a woman; c/o Wayne: LeBoeuf; a man; in the same condition as the day you took wrongful possession; and;
i; a woman; Aimee; require; compensation; from each of you; for the wrong; you; a woman; Sharon Hill; and; and; you; a man; Keith Horton; together with all Agents and/or Principals associated with you in your Official capacity as a Public Servant; do to i; a woman; in the amount of the ‘True Bill’; attached; and;
i; a woman; Aimee; claim; verify; all herein be true; and will verify same in open Court; if i require;

WHEREFORE; in consideration of the evidence and Wrongdoer’s confession; i; Aimee; a woman; at common law; aggrieved; wronged; harmed; Claimant; Order; this Court to enter Default Judgment; for each of my Claims; signed by the attending Magistrate; upon Wrongdoers; each and all of them; Named or Unnamed; for the aforesaid Claims; proved and seasoned by Wrongdoer(s)’ acquiescence; for Wrongs upon i; a woman; and my property; such Wrongs caused by Wrongdoer(s) upon i; without verified claim or right or authority; with proper Compensation to i; as claimed within the True Bill attached to this my Claims; with all rights reserved to i; Claimant;
Dated this 21[SUP]st[/SUP] day of March, 2014


By:_________________________________
i ; aimee-laura: LeBoeuf [Chiasson]; a.k.a. ‘Aimee Chiasson’;
a woman; aggrieved; wronged; harmed; Claimant;







VERIFIED / CERTIFIED PROCESS SERVICE

i verify/certify; under penalty of perjury; that a true and correct copy of this file; CLAIMS: TORT; TRESPASS; AND ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO RESTORE PROPERTY; AND COMPENSATION; and verified evidence; be delivered; by hand; to the Clerk of Court; and by hand; to Wrongdoers; SHARON HILL; DIRECTOR; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES (‘DFCS’) et. al.; and; KEITH HORTON; COMMISSIONER; GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES (‘DHS’);et. al.; by way of Wrongdoers’ Counsel; JOSEPH JUSTICE; SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (‘SAAG’); DHS AGENT; and; JENNIFER CARRERAS; GUARDIAN AD LITEM; DFCS AGENT; this 21[SUP]st[/SUP] day of March, 2014; at the address given below...

_________________________________
i ; aimee-laura: LeBoeuf [Chiasson]; a.k.a. ‘Aimee Chiasson’;
a woman; aggrieved; wronged; harmed; Claimant;


Attn: SHARON HILL; DIRECTOR;
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES;
DIVISION OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES (‘DFCS’); et. al.;
c/o JENNIFER CARRERAS; ESQUIRE
GUARDIAN AD LITEM; DFCS AGENT
PAULDING COUNTY COURTHOUSE
280 CONSTITUTION BLVD.; ROOM 2106
DALLAS, GEORGIA [30132]

Attn: KEITH HORTON; COMMISSIONER;
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES (‘DHS’);et. al.;
c/o JOSEPH JUSTICE; ESQUIRE
SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (‘SAAG’); DHS AGENT;
PAULDING COUNTY COURTHOUSE
280 CONSTITUTION BLVD.; ROOM 2106
DALLAS, GEORGIA [30132]

DAVID VANN; CLERK OF COURT
PAULDING COUNTY COURTHOUSE
280 CONSTITUTION BLVD.; ROOM 2106
DALLAS, GEORGIA [30132]


*************** *************** ***************

COMMERCIAL OATH AND VERIFICATION

Paulding county )
) Commercial Oath and Verification
Georgia state )

i, aimee chiasson; under my unlimited liability and Commercial Oath; proceeding in good faith; being of sound mind; verify that the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete and not misleading; to the best of my knowledge; and; belief; under Penalty; of Perjury; and International Commercial Law.

Aimee Chiasson; Claimant;


By:_________________________________ , [UCC 3-402 (b)(1)]
i ; aimee-laura: LeBoeuf [Chiasson]; a.k.a. ‘Aimee Chiasson’;
a woman; aggrieved; wronged; harmed; Claimant;


We still have common law as our basic law form. We don't use it, but it is there to be used if we demand it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I_7zQrSMcI


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaXRSEBgbaE


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwyBESRGpm1vZRErvtSmNGg/feed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

glockngold

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,109
Likes
3,611
#4
Being skeptical of miracles, ... I had to look.

Miracle Mineral Supplement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Miracle Mineral Supplement, often referred to as Miracle Mineral Solution, Master Mineral Solution, or MMS, is a toxic solution of 28%[1] sodium chlorite in distilled water. The product contains essentially the same ingredient as industrial-strength bleach before "activation" with a food-grade acid. The name was coined by Jim Humble in his 2006 self-published book, The Miracle Mineral Solution of the 21st Century.[2] A more dilute version is marketed as Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS).[3]

MMS is falsely promoted as a cure for HIV, malaria, hepatitis viruses, the H1N1 flu virus, common colds, autism, acne, cancer, and much more. There have been no clinical trials to test these claims, which come only from anecdotal reports and Humble's book.[4][5] In January 2010, The Sydney Morning Herald reported that one vendor admitted that they do not repeat any of Humble's claims in writing to circumvent regulations against using it as a medicine.[6] Sellers sometimes describe MMS as a water purifier so as to circumvent medical regulations.[7] The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies rejected "in the strongest terms" reports by promoters of MMS that they had used the product to fight malaria.[8]

Sodium chlorite, the main constituent of MMS, is a toxic chemical[9][10] that can cause acute renal failure[11] if ingested. Small amounts of about 1 gram can be expected to cause nausea, vomiting and even life-threatening hemolysis in persons who are deficient in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. When citric acid or other food acid is used to "activate" MMS as described in its instructions,[12] the mixture produces an aqueous solution containing chlorine dioxide, a toxin and a potent oxidizing agent used in the treatment of water and in bleaching.[1] The United States Environmental Protection Agency has set a maximum level of 0.8 mg/L for chlorine dioxide in drinking water.[13] Naren Gunja, director of the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre, has stated that using the product is "a bit like drinking concentrated bleach" and that users have displayed symptoms consistent with corrosive injuries, such as vomiting, stomach pains, and diarrhea.[14]

Contents

1 Safety and legal issues
2 Judgments
3 See also
4 References

Safety and legal issues

The Guardian has described MMS as "extremely nasty stuff, and the medical advice given is that anyone who has this product should stop using it immediately and throw it away. In Canada it was banned after causing a life-threatening reaction."[15] In August 2009, a Mexican woman travelling with her American husband on their yacht in Vanuatu took MMS as a preventative for malaria. Within 15 minutes she was ill, and within twelve hours she was dead. The island nation's public prosecutor, Kayleen Tavoa, did not press any charges as there were no specific laws banning the importation of MMS, but advised, "While every case is assessed on its own merits, I advise that any person who misuses MMS in Vanuatu in the future would be likely to face prosecution for potentially serious criminal offences. No person should ever give MMS to another person to drink without advising them of what it is they are drinking and of the serious risks to health that may arise if they decide to drink the mixture."[16][17]

In 2008, a 60-year-old Canadian man was hospitalized after a life-threatening response to MMS.[18] Following a May 2010 advisory which indicated that MMS exceeds tolerable levels of sodium chlorite by a factor of 200,[19] a Calgary based supplier briefly stopped distribution. A February 2012 warning, which resulted in one website shutting down, advised: "There are no therapeutic products containing sodium chlorite authorized for oral consumption by humans in Canada."[20][21] In the UK, the Food Standards Agency also has released a warning, following the initial warning from Health Canada and a similar warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in which they stated that "MMS is a 28% sodium chlorite solution which is equivalent to industrial-strength bleach. When taken as directed it could cause severe nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, potentially leading to dehydration and reduced blood pressure. If the solution is diluted less than instructed, it could cause damage to the gut and red blood cells, potentially resulting in respiratory failure."[22][23] More dilute versions have potential to do harm, although it is less likely. The Food Standards Agency has since reiterated their warning on MMS and extended it to include CDS.[3][24]

Sellers attribute the vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea to the product working, but it is simply the product's toxicity.[25]

In December 2009, an alert was issued by the Belgian Poison Control Centre to the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. In response, an evaluation was performed by the French "Comité de coordination de toxicovigilance" in March 2010, warning about a dose dependent irritation and possible toxic effects. They also warned that patients affected by serious diseases could be tempted to stop their treatments in favour of this alternative treatment.[26] A similar notice was released in July 2010 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warning that the instructions for preparing the solution by mixing it with an acidic solution, or even orange juice, would produce chlorine dioxide, "a potent bleach used for stripping textiles and industrial water treatment." Because of reports including nausea, vomiting, and dangerously low blood pressure as a result of dehydration following instructed use, the FDA has advised consumers to dispose of the product immediately.[1]

MMS is not approved for the treatment of any disease and according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, chronic exposure to small doses of chlorine dioxide could cause reproductive and neurodevelopmental damage.[27] A short term study found no effects in hematological or urine chemistry or in physical symptoms in human volunteers over a period of 84 days.[28] While studies of chlorine dioxide effects in humans are rare, studies on animal subjects are more common; chlorine dioxide has been shown to impair thyroid function and reduce CD4+ helper T cell count in grivet monkeys after 6 months.[29] Another study in rats resulted in reduced red blood cells count when exposed to 100 mg/L of chlorine dioxide concentration in their drinking water, after 3 months.[30] The United States Department of Labor restricts occupational exposure through inhalation of chlorine dioxide to 0.1 ppm since concentrations at 10 ppm resulted in deaths in rats, after 10 days while a case where a worker was accidentally exposed to 19 ppm resulted in death.[31] According to the same organisation, "chlorine dioxide is a severe respiratory and eye irritant in humans".[31]
 

TAEZZAR

LADY JUSTICE ISNT BLIND, SHES JUST AFRAID TO WATCH
Midas Member
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
13,484
Likes
22,705
Location
ORYGUN
#5
Being skeptical of miracles, ... I had to look.
Thanks, glockngold, but the taking of the children was for POSSESSION of the MMS, so is it justified to kidnap children because bleach is in the home,
or ammonia, or a gun ?

I feel the article was more about abuse of power & the money earned for kidnapping innocent children from innocent families, under the color of law.

Every time CPS [or DHS, in the Stanleys' case] seizes a child, it gets money from the federal government.

Lots of money.
At a website called Medical Kidnap one reader, Jacquie Trump, noted that government authorities, under the standard used against the family, should lose their own children, because “there are dangerous chemicals in their own homes.”

“Bleach, draino, toilet bowl cleaner, tylenol, stain, varnish, glues and the list goes on and on. It is criminal that this gestapo organization can break into your home and terrorize anyone at anytime over anyone reporting anything.”

This is yet another reason why many say the MMS angle was just a pretext, that the real reason for the children’s seizure was the Stanleys’ politically incorrect lifestyle. As Natural News also wrote:

This is also a war against home schooling because the couple's children are all being home schooled.

The Stanley family is not just into home schooling; they're also into preparedness, natural medicine, home gardening and all the other essential life skills that the tyrannical government in America is trying to crush or outlaw.
 
Last edited:

glockngold

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,109
Likes
3,611
#6
Thanks, glockngold, but the taken of the children was for POSSESSION of the MMS, so is it justified to kidnap children because bleach is in the home,
or ammonia, or a gun ?
I feel the article was more about abuse of power & the money earned for kidnapping innocent children from innocent families, under the color of law.
Of course it is not justified.
.gov has little to do anymore that makes sense.
It's just for me that as a former homeschool house, I squirm when a homeschool house makes a decision I feel is unwise.
But it is their house.
 

Zed

Size doesn't count!
Midas Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
12,036
Likes
9,575
Location
Springfield
#7
MMS when mixed or 'activated' creates CLO2 or chlorine dioxide, a substance that has been used to render drinking water safe for around 60 years. It is very effective against pathogens, people swear by this stuff... in the right dose of course.

Anyway, when the authorities use it then its certified 'safe'!?!!!!