• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

Swamp Draining Progress

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
9,034
Likes
9,964
Location
Instant Gratification Land

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201

Irons

Deep Sixed
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
29,139
Likes
52,199
View attachment 128741

This is in the comments section.....It spoke to me :)
I would not be one bit surprised to find Sessions is and has been on our side all along. If he is a hero of the left why isn't he on talk shows trashing our president like every single other loser?


.
 

Irons

Deep Sixed
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
29,139
Likes
52,199
What a stupid fecker. All he had to do was mind his own business and he'd still be chasing ambulances and shaking down widows.
But no, he had to attack our president...................

Creepy Porn Lawyer Indicted on 36 More Federal Charges of Tax Evasion, Bank Fraud, Perjury and Theft From Clients…
Posted on April 11, 2019by sundance



Wow, CPL is having a very bad day. [Details Here] The scale of the new grand jury indictments against Avenatti for his alleged criminal behavior is clear; if convicted on all counts he could spend 335 years in prison.
Attorney Michael Avenatti has been charged in a 36-count federal indictment alleging he stole millions of dollars from clients, did not pay his taxes, committed bank fraud and lied in bankruptcy proceedings.


.
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201
Attorney Michael Avenatti has been charged in a 36-count federal indictment alleging he stole millions of dollars from clients, did not pay his taxes, committed bank fraud and lied in bankruptcy proceedings.
Seems like a real prince!
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201

Irons

Deep Sixed
Sr Site Supporter
Mother Lode
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
29,139
Likes
52,199
.
Derek12 hours ago
“The President needs to open up the libel laws. I’m getting sick of this. Time to make moves against these people.”
It's starting to boil over. Feels good man.



Trump Jr. Slams Newsweek Over Deceptive Headline: ‘You Lying POS’
By KYLE MORRIS



Donald Trump Jr. put Newsweek on blast Thursday over a tweet which made it appear that he and Candace Owens defended Hitler.

“Donald Trump Jr. praises Candace Owens for her defense of Hitler comments,” Newsweek’s tweet read.

In his original tweet on Candace Owens’ performance throughout the hearing, Trump Jr. said, “Wow. Well done @RealCandaceO!!!” Trump Jr. tweeted. “Great to see someone call out the Dems on their purposeful manipulation of facts for their narrative. Since the media runs with anything they say and is the marketing wing of the DNC they aren’t used to getting called out for the repeated BS.”

Donald Trump Jr.’s praise of Owens had nothing to do with “her defense of Hitler comments,” but rather focused on her performance during the hearing when she held Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) accountable after he only played a portion of a clip in which Owens was discussing nationalism in regard to Hitler.

After the tweet was shared, Trump Jr. responded, “Hey guys, just here for the Ratio you lying POS!!!”

In addition to Trump Jr.’s comment to Newsweek, Owens also weighed in on the matter.

“The President needs to open up the libel laws. I’m getting sick of this. Time to make moves against these people,” Owens said in a reply to Trump Jr.


.
 

engineear

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
1,987
Likes
2,370
Location
North of the Wall
.
Derek12 hours ago
“The President needs to open up the libel laws. I’m getting sick of this. Time to make moves against these people.”
It's starting to boil over. Feels good man.



Trump Jr. Slams Newsweek Over Deceptive Headline: ‘You Lying POS’
By KYLE MORRIS



Donald Trump Jr. put Newsweek on blast Thursday over a tweet which made it appear that he and Candace Owens defended Hitler.

“Donald Trump Jr. praises Candace Owens for her defense of Hitler comments,” Newsweek’s tweet read.

In his original tweet on Candace Owens’ performance throughout the hearing, Trump Jr. said, “Wow. Well done @RealCandaceO!!!” Trump Jr. tweeted. “Great to see someone call out the Dems on their purposeful manipulation of facts for their narrative. Since the media runs with anything they say and is the marketing wing of the DNC they aren’t used to getting called out for the repeated BS.”

Donald Trump Jr.’s praise of Owens had nothing to do with “her defense of Hitler comments,” but rather focused on her performance during the hearing when she held Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) accountable after he only played a portion of a clip in which Owens was discussing nationalism in regard to Hitler.

After the tweet was shared, Trump Jr. responded, “Hey guys, just here for the Ratio you lying POS!!!”

In addition to Trump Jr.’s comment to Newsweek, Owens also weighed in on the matter.

“The President needs to open up the libel laws. I’m getting sick of this. Time to make moves against these people,” Owens said in a reply to Trump Jr.


.
She and me share the last name though she's a lot sharper, but I have American Indian dna and have relatives from the Hatfield clan...i know, big deal. Gotta like her though. She should run for office.
 

Aurumag

Ag mirror of truth Aurum purity of mind
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
9,401
Likes
11,461
Location
State of Jefferson

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201
She should run for office.
Women should not be in politics, men fuck it up enough, the last thing this country needs is a woman's touch
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
Hillary Clinton Superdelegate Pleads Guilty, Headed to Jail



https://thedcpatriot.com/hillary-clinton-superdelegate-pleads-guilty-headed-to-jail/
1555182488063.png
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
4,821
Likes
3,917

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
1555337201584.png


When Omar met Erdogan: The unearthed report from their 2017 meeting



About a year and a half ago, on Sept. 18, 2017, a relatively unknown Minnesota state representative flew to New York City to hold a closed-door meeting with the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who was in town for the 72nd U.N. General Assembly. This meeting of now-Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., with Mr. Erdogan, the despotic ruler of Turkey, went almost entirely unreported, as it was not open to the press and Omar was not a high-profile figure. Since then, photos of the meeting surfaced on social media, but it largely appeared that there was no report detailing what happened during the hour-long meeting.



But one local Minnesota paper that covers the Somali community did receive access to the Erdogan-Omar meeting. That publication is the relatively obscure Tusmo Times, a Somali paper that covers the Twin Cities metro area. Abdirahman Mukhtar, its founder and editor, wrote a story in the Somali language discussing the meeting. For reasons unknown, the piece has since been deleted by the Tusmo Times. However, a copy of the report was obtained from archive.org’s Wayback Machine and translated by One Hour Translate.



The story makes clear, through photos and text, that Omar led the Minnesota-based Somali delegation (which included her non-politician husband, who is seen next to her in photos) that met with Erdogan. This is quite remarkable, given that Omar was then a mere Minnesota state representative, meeting face to face with the leader of an 80-million-person nation with one of the most powerful militaries in the world.



Speaking to the Tusmo Times, Omar said, according to the translation, that she met with Erdogan for about an hour and that the two discussed issues involving Omar’s native Somalia and issues for Somalis in Minnesota. She thanked Erdogan for Turkey’s support for the Rohingya people in Myanmar. The two also discussed investment and trade between Turkey and Somalia. The meeting ended with Erdogan asking Omar to voice her support for Turkey. The report concludes by adding that Omar not only met with Erdogan, but also with the Turkish prime minister and other senior Turkish officials.



While it’s not particularly shocking that Omar remains invested in the success of her native country, the Minnesota representative has been consistently sowing doubt about whether U.S. Jews as a whole can fairly represent American interests. She has taken to using anti-Semitic tropes in maintaining that support for Israel in the Jewish community is an example of having dual loyalties.



Of course, support for Israel, the only liberal democratic country in the Middle East, is not remotely comparable to her continuing support for the rogue dictatorships in Turkey and Somalia.



The day the story was posted, Omar tweeted about her meeting with Erdogan, linking to the now-deleted Tusmo Times piece.



When news of the meeting surfaced, she immediately received fierce blowback on several social media platforms for propping up Erdogan.



“Did you ask Erdogan about the jailed journalists?” wrote one respondent on her Facebook page. “How about the 100 thousand innocent people he jailed in Turkey.”



“Did you discuss the atrocities of the Armenian Genocide and his refusal to recognize them?” said another individual.



“What the hell is wrong with you?? He’s a DICTATOR,” another replied.



https://www.conservativereview.com/news/omar-met-erdogan/
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
Outrage: Federal judge compares POTUS Trump to ‘KKK,’ George Wallace, because he wants to protect our country

President Donald Trump is not the only person in America to criticize the federal judiciary in recent years for its stunning overreach into areas of government our founders specifically tried to wall off.

Earlier this month, in fact, former federal prosecutor and GOP lawmaker Bob Barr noted that when it comes to the issue of immigration, especially, activist federal judges have routinely flouted established law and constitutional presidential authority to rule against the country and on behalf of people who have no legal right to be here.

He noted:

If you were to guess the most critical problem faced by President Trump in dealing with the flood of illegal immigration at our southern border, what would it be? Foreign government-sponsored migration caravans? Funding for the border wall? A shortage of border patrol agents? Indeed, these all are aspects of the serious problems Trump is encountering in addressing the ongoing crisis at out southern border; but they fail to get to the heart of the problem the president faces in taking steps to solve the crisis.

In a word, judges are the main obstacle standing between the president and his ability to seriously address the border crisis. Federal judges.

Interestingly, our founding fathers warned of this very problem more than two centuries ago. “At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government,” Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1823. “Experience however soon shewed in what way they were to become the most dangerous.”

Any serious observer of the evolving relationship between the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches over the past several decades would agree that the federal court system — not states, not Congress and certainly not the president — have become the final arbiter of rule in America.

So it’s outrageous for a federal judge to not only deny this is happening but to compare our current president to a Democratic evil from a bygone era.

As reported by The Daily Caller:

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019/04/14/outrage-federal-judge-compares-potus-trump-to-kkk-george-wallace-because-he-wants-to-protect-our-country/
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
Senate IT Office Hit With ‘Housecleaning’ in Hassan Aide Scandal

WASHINGTON—Senate sergeant-at-arms officials have conducted a “general housecleaning” that resulted in “massive personnel changes” in the upper chamber’s information technology and cybersecurity systems staff, The Epoch Times has learned. “There’s been massive personnel changes over there,” said a Senate source with knowledge of the situation who requested anonymity. “The new people are a lot more strict and putting on a lot more rules and restrictions. They have just been tightening down a lot since then.”

Among those who have left is John Clayton Porter. He was branch manager for information assurance–cybersecurity from March 2017 until earlier this month, according to LegiStorm. He was paid $88,628 annually at the time of his departure, according to Senate records. The sergeant-at-arms (SAA) office declined to discuss Porter or personnel changes that have been implemented in his former office. A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also declined to comment. The staff and rules changes come in the wake of a guilty plea entered in federal court April 5 by Jackson Cosko, a former information technology aide to Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas). Mannal Haddad, press secretary for the House Administration Committee, which oversees the House computer networks, declined to comment when asked by The Epoch Times about Cosko and whether new cybersecurity measures were implemented as a result of the case.

Cosko admitted guilt in the pleading to two counts of making public restricted private information in October 2018 about McConnell, and other senators, including Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Cosko also admitted guilt to one count each of computer fraud, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice. Prior to agreeing to the plea, Cosko faced as many as 11 separate felony counts. The case was heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and was first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Luke Rosiak.

Cosko’s offenses commenced after he was terminated from Hassan’s staff in May 2018 for reasons the New Hampshire senator has refused to make public. He then obtained the position on the House side with Jackson-Lee, and during the following months, with the assistance of a second person, gained access to at least six computers in Hassan’s office. “Beginning no later than July 2018 and continuing until October 2018, the defendant engaged in an extensive computer fraud and data theft scheme that he carried out by repeatedly burglarizing Senator Hassan’s office,” prosecutors said in Cosko’s April 5 pleading. “The defendant engaged in an extraordinarily extensive data-theft scheme, copying entire network drives, sorting and organizing sensitive data, and exploring ways to use that data to his benefit.”

Cosko became angry at the Republican senators in October 2018, according to prosecutors, while watching the Senate Judiciary Committee’s confirmation hearing for Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Cosko used Wikipedia to make public the senators’ home addresses, credit card data, and health information. He was able to gain access to the Hassan office computers by placing an unobtrusive keystroke logging device on them. The Wikipedia entries by Cosko were investigated by the U.S Capitol Police, which tracked them to the former Hassan aide, according to the government’s Oct. 3, 2018, criminal complaint. When Cosko was observed in Hassan’s office by another aide after his termination, prosecutors said, he wrote the aide a threatening email, stating: “If you tell anyone, I will leak it all. Emails, signal conversations, gmails. Senators’ children’s health information and socials.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/senate-it-office-hit-with-housecleaning-in-hassan-aide-scandal_2878451.html
 

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201
No one with more than two brain cells pays any attention to rankings or polls or any other information which comes out from the anal cavity of the media. Everyone is trying to fool us so we have a responsibility to ourselves to be more objective of everything. The sheep will always be sheep!
 
Last edited:

the_shootist

Midas Member
Midas Member
Midas Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33,395
Likes
44,201
Senate IT Office Hit With ‘Housecleaning’ in Hassan Aide Scandal

WASHINGTON—Senate sergeant-at-arms officials have conducted a “general housecleaning” that resulted in “massive personnel changes” in the upper chamber’s information technology and cybersecurity systems staff, The Epoch Times has learned. “There’s been massive personnel changes over there,” said a Senate source with knowledge of the situation who requested anonymity. “The new people are a lot more strict and putting on a lot more rules and restrictions. They have just been tightening down a lot since then.”

Among those who have left is John Clayton Porter. He was branch manager for information assurance–cybersecurity from March 2017 until earlier this month, according to LegiStorm. He was paid $88,628 annually at the time of his departure, according to Senate records. The sergeant-at-arms (SAA) office declined to discuss Porter or personnel changes that have been implemented in his former office. A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also declined to comment. The staff and rules changes come in the wake of a guilty plea entered in federal court April 5 by Jackson Cosko, a former information technology aide to Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas). Mannal Haddad, press secretary for the House Administration Committee, which oversees the House computer networks, declined to comment when asked by The Epoch Times about Cosko and whether new cybersecurity measures were implemented as a result of the case.

Cosko admitted guilt in the pleading to two counts of making public restricted private information in October 2018 about McConnell, and other senators, including Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Cosko also admitted guilt to one count each of computer fraud, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice. Prior to agreeing to the plea, Cosko faced as many as 11 separate felony counts. The case was heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and was first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Luke Rosiak.

Cosko’s offenses commenced after he was terminated from Hassan’s staff in May 2018 for reasons the New Hampshire senator has refused to make public. He then obtained the position on the House side with Jackson-Lee, and during the following months, with the assistance of a second person, gained access to at least six computers in Hassan’s office. “Beginning no later than July 2018 and continuing until October 2018, the defendant engaged in an extensive computer fraud and data theft scheme that he carried out by repeatedly burglarizing Senator Hassan’s office,” prosecutors said in Cosko’s April 5 pleading. “The defendant engaged in an extraordinarily extensive data-theft scheme, copying entire network drives, sorting and organizing sensitive data, and exploring ways to use that data to his benefit.”

Cosko became angry at the Republican senators in October 2018, according to prosecutors, while watching the Senate Judiciary Committee’s confirmation hearing for Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Cosko used Wikipedia to make public the senators’ home addresses, credit card data, and health information. He was able to gain access to the Hassan office computers by placing an unobtrusive keystroke logging device on them. The Wikipedia entries by Cosko were investigated by the U.S Capitol Police, which tracked them to the former Hassan aide, according to the government’s Oct. 3, 2018, criminal complaint. When Cosko was observed in Hassan’s office by another aide after his termination, prosecutors said, he wrote the aide a threatening email, stating: “If you tell anyone, I will leak it all. Emails, signal conversations, gmails. Senators’ children’s health information and socials.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/senate-it-office-hit-with-housecleaning-in-hassan-aide-scandal_2878451.html
Hassan and Jackson should be publicly hanged for enabling treason against the US
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
POTUS_Schedule Retweeted
1555340523121.png

Matt Wolking

‏Verified account @MattWolking

50m50 minutes ago



“the sunlight of transparency soon will shine on the rancid corruption of the [DOJ, FBI & intelligence agencies under Obama]. Turning the tables on the conspirators is absolutely necessary to hold accountable those who tried to rig the election.”




As Trump soars higher, Dems reach their lowest point yet



By Michael Goodwin



April 13, 2019 | 10:51pm



https://nypost.com/2019/04/13/as-trump-soars-higher-dems-reach-their-lowest-point-yet/



Predicting what history will decide was significant is always dicey. But in the context of our fractured nation and the nonstop Washington tumult since 2016, events in the last three weeks have been nothing short of remarkable.



Against an enormous army of antagonists, political and cultural, academic and judicial, Donald Trump is enjoying some of the best days of his presidency. His power and popularity are expanding.



Meanwhile, Democrats and the left, including the media, have suffered one crushing blow after another. Their recent confidence that Trump was not long for the Oval Office is suddenly morphing into a panic that he could win a second term.



The worm began turning on the afternoon of Sunday, March 24, when Attorney General William Barr released his letter summarizing the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller. There was no collusion with Russia, Mueller found, and no obstruction of justice, Barr determined.



The momentous victory for Trump vindicated his claims of innocence. The fog of accusations that he was an illegitimate president was destroyed by a news flash that left no room for ambiguity.



To grasp the significance, imagine the consequences if the report found he was probably guilty of one or both charges.



The left would have erupted in orgasmic joy. We would be discussing articles of impeachment and Republicans would have fallen in line. There would have been worldwide implications as America turned inward to face its crisis.



Yet it is now apparent that Mueller’s report, as great as it was for Trump, was just the start of a dramatic turnaround in the fortunes of both the president and his tormentors. The bookend, at least so far, came last week with Barr’s stunning comment that “spying did occur” on Trump’s 2016 campaign and that Barr was obligated to review “the conduct of the investigation.”



“Spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” Barr said matter-of-factly.
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943

Obama Waging Psychological Warfare on Americans, Says Crazy Doctor


Dr. Keith Ablow lays out the case that President Obama is conducting psychological warfare on us.

JAMES JOYNER · TUESDAY, JUNE 4, 2013

Dr. Keith Ablow asks, “Is Obama waging psychological warfare on Americans?”



Having never considered this question, I was intrigued. Who better to answer this question than Dr. Keith Ablow?



I believe that the Obama administration is conducting psychological warfare on conservative Americans. Not only that but it is also waging this war on all Americans who previously viewed themselves, their country, their Constitution and their overwhelming belief in God as a force for good in the world.



Interesting. So, what is Dr. Keith Albow’s evidence for said beliefs?



The psychological warfare began with an apology tour in which President Obama publicly “confessed,” presuming to speak for all of us, for the shortcomings of America and our supposed contributions to tyranny and all manner of evils around the world.



I’m familiar with said apology tour—the name of which is controversial in some circles since Obama never technically apologized–but had never considered that it might be pyschological warfare. But, in hindsight, it was sneaky of our elected leader to claim to speak for the country.



This confession planted in the American mind the notion that our values and beliefs might not be in line with freedom and truth.



What evidence is there for that? Well, never mind.



It was reinforced by the first lady stating during the 2008 presidential campaign that she had never felt pride in our country.



If I recall my logical fallacies correctly, post hoc ergo propter hoc is among them. But pre hoc ergo propter hoc is not! So, QED, Dr. Keith Albow is probably right.



These statements were seemingly shrugged off by Americans who, collectively, seemed to be telling themselves that they were hearing discontent channeled from disenfranchised groups in our nation who, nonetheless, loved the country—and all of us, too.



But, deep inside the American psyche, something more malignant could have been planted—the seeds of self-hatred and self-doubt. And I no longer believe that those seeds were planted unintentionally by people as smart and capable as the president and first lady.



So, we go from two “seems” and a “could have” to something that definitely happened deliberately. Why not? And he mentions that these people are “smart and capable”—a confession against interest—so he’s probably not biased in any way.



Psychological warfare has been described as a set of techniques aimed at influencing a target audience’s value systems or beliefs and inducing confessions of wrongdoing or attitudes favorable to the group proffering the techniques.

Pretty much everything any politician says or does falls into that description. And Obama’s a politician. Indeed, a smart and capable one. So, yeah, he’s probably engaged in psychological warfare.



The techniques are often combined with black ops strategy, in which covert initiatives seek to dispirit, disempower and confuse adversaries….



https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/obama-waging-psychological-warfare-on-americans-says-crazy-doctor/
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
1555343672740.png

Pope’s possible successor says mass migration is in reality an INVASION and will lead to the extinction of Europe if not stopped!



Robert Sarah, an African cardinal who serves as the head of the Vatican’s liturgy office, is often named in traditionalist circles as their hope to one day succeed Pope Francis.

Those who seek to use the Bible to promote migration are pushing a “false” interpretation of the scriptures, Cardinal Sarah said in a new interview with French publication Valeurs Actuelles.

He also branded mass migration a “new form of slavery”.

The cardinal has frequently made waves with his more conservative stances on liturgical practices, Islam, migration and other issues.

Those positions were on full display in the French article, in which Sarah, from Guinea, blasted priests and bishops who “say fuzzy things, vague, imprecise, to escape criticism, and they marry the stupid evolution of the world”.

On Europe, Sarah said that the Church should not cooperate with the increasing acceptance by politicians of mass migration into the traditionally Christian continent.

“All migrants who arrive in Europe are penniless, without work, without dignity… This is what the Church wants?” he asked.

“The Church can not cooperate with this new form of slavery that has become mass migration. If the West continues in this fatal way, there is a great risk that, due to a lack of birth, it will disappear, invaded by foreigners, just as Rome has been invaded by barbarians.”

“My country is predominantly Muslim. I think I know what reality I’m talking about”, he added.

Sarah’s comments are in stark contrast to those from Pope Francis on the subject. Francis has repeatedly stressed the value of migration and has encouraged European countries, in particular, to open their border to flows of migrants coming from the third world.

Last week, he spoke in Morocco, the main destination for sub-Saharan African migrants seeking to reach Europe via Spain, and frequently mentioned migration.

“The issue of migration will never be resolved by raising barriers, fomenting fear of others or denying assistance to those who legitimately aspire to a better life for themselves and their families”, Francis said.

Sarah is much more skeptical of whether the Church should be open to immigration.

He cited the example of Poland, a Catholic country that has strict immigration policies, and said he had urged it not to sacrifice its Polish and Catholic identities “on the altar of a technocratic and stateless Europe”.

“She is free to tell Europe that everyone was created by God to be placed in a specific place, with its culture, traditions, and history”, he told the paper. “This current desire to globalize the world by suppressing nations, specificities, is pure madness.”

In the interview, he urged Europe to avoid embracing materialism and forgetting its Christian heritage, warning that it could lead to the extinction of Europe itself.

“If Europe disappears, and with it the invaluable values of the old continent, Islam will invade the world”, Sarah said. “And we will totally change culture, anthropology, and moral vision.”
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
1555350215908.png

Obama's Brennan problem about to explode?
Exclusive: Jack Cashill calls BHO's ties to ex-CIA chief his 'greatest point of vulnerability'
Published: 03/27/2019 at 6:50 PM
Barack Obama may not yet understand the effect the Mueller Report will have on his legacy. Caught up perhaps in the details of who said what to whom, he may overlook for the moment the report’s most significant consequence.
His Praetorian Guard has been disarmed. The media will no longer be willing and able to protect Obama as they have for the last 15 years.

Obama’s greatest point of vulnerability is his relationship with former CIA chief and collusion conspirator John Brennan.

For the last two years, the media have lauded Brennan as a fearless truth teller. Just two weeks before the report was released, in his role as national security analyst for NBC and MSNBC, Brennan was promising “more indictments.”

Brennan expected Trump family members to be the ones indicted, specifically for colluding with Russia. Two days after the report was released, a seemingly contrite Brennan was claiming he may have received “bad information.”

To rebuild their reputation, journalists will not turn on Obama, at least not immediately, but they will turn on Brennan for embarrassing them.

In doing so, they may eventually reveal the hold Brennan has had on Obama for the last eight years. It involves one very real incident that was appallingly under-reported when it happened. Few in the media are today even aware of it.

In the way of background, there are some interesting parallels between Brennan and Obama. Both flirted openly with Marxism as young men. Brennan voted for Communist Party USA boss Gus Hall, by 1976 a Soviet puppet for nearly five decades.
Both also flirted with Islam. Brennan was reportedly the target of a successful Saudi intelligence operation to convert him to Islam during Brennan’s stint, circa 1996, as CIA station chief in Riyadh.
Curiously too, the summer after his freshman year, Brennan traveled to Indonesia allegedly to “research the politics of oil.” After Obama’s sophomore year, Obama traveled to Pakistan, and the reporting on this trip is where his and Brennan’s path first publicly intersect.


Obama did not mention the Pakistan visit in either of his books, the 1995 “Dreams from My Father” or the 2006 “Audacity of Hope.”Nor did he mention it on the campaign trail until April 2008.

“I traveled to Pakistan when I was in college,” said Obama to prove his foreign policy chops at a San Francisco fundraiser. “I knew what Sunni and Shia was before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.”

This declaration took ABC reporter Jake Tapper by surprise. He thought it odd that he had not heard of this trip, especially “given all the talk of Pakistan during this campaign.”

Indeed, Obama had introduced the general subject of Pakistan as early as Aug. 1, 2007. As Tapper observed at the time, Obama talked about U.S. Pakistan policy as a way of challenging Hillary’s perceived strength on foreign affairs.

Yet despite the strategic edge his personal Pakistan experience might have given him, Obama failed to mention his Pakistan adventure in that August 2007 speech or for the next eight months.

In fact, Obama spent at least three weeks in Pakistan, maybe as long as a semester. Had the media been a little bit curious they might have blown open one of the great, under-reported stories of the 2008 campaign, a story that broke quietly just two weeks prior to Obama’s Pakistani epiphany.

This story involved the breach of the presidential candidates’ passport records a few weeks earlier. On March 22, 2008, the Washington Post reported in the 13th paragraph of a minor article that one of the three contract employees caught breaching the files worked for the Analysis Corporation, the CEO of which was a certain John Brennan.

Analysis Corp. had fewer than 100 employees, and its one culpable employee escaped discipline. The Post article reported only that this unnamed person’s employment status was “under review.” Nor was Brennan a “casual donor” to the Obama campaign as reported.

In her book, “Red Thread,” Diana West asks,

“Were these hackers, as we were told, simply indulging their curiosity, or were they changing anything in the passport records?”

As West observes, “No answers are to be seen, literally, in the ensuing IG report, which is so heavily redacted, including 29 pages blacked-out without interruption.”

The media refuse to ask whether Brennan’s man was just reviewing the files of the three viable candidates – McCain, Clinton and Obama – or, more likely, doctoring Obama’s file to account for the Pakistan trip.

The second answer is the more likely one. If Brennan ever talks, he will have a lot to tell.
https://www.wnd.com/
 

ABC123

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,943
Obama Adviser’s Book Is Ranked 1,030 On Amazon. How Did It Make NYT’s Best Seller List?

Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s book is number 1,030 on Amazon with only three reviews, but is on the NYT Best Seller list. An industry insider said that was “inconceivable” and that Jarrett likely paid a company that helps authors buy their way onto the list.
One such company buys 10,000 copies of an author’s book and tries to prevent bestseller lists from realizing the sales aren’t organic, in which case the book may be moved down or taken off the list.
There were 12,600 reported sales of Jarrett’s book, enough to rank it highly on the Publishers Weekly chart, but Publishers Weekly did not put it on its list at all.


Valerie Jarrett, a top adviser to former President Barack Obama, published a book that ranks dismally on Amazon and at Barnes and Noble, but was placed on The New York Times Best Seller list. Anomalies around the book’s sales figures in industry databases have some in the book business questioning whether Jarrett, who’s rumored to have received a million-dollar-plus advance, paid a company to game the numbers. Her book, which was published April 2, is number 1,030 on Amazon’s list of top sellers and has only three reviews on the site. It similarly ranks 1,244 on Barnes and Noble where signed copies are being sold for less than the suggested retail for unsigned copies.

Yet the book was also 14th on the NYT bestseller list. “Given the organic sales of that book and the fact that during the entire week of rollout it barely cracked the top 100 on Amazon, there’s no way the book should have a place on the NYT Best Seller list. Inconceivable,” one prominent book industry insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “There’s likely an effort to game the system, it’s the only explanation.“

Jarrett’s book outsold all but the top four books on the NYT list, according to BookScan, which tracks sales figures. But instead of putting it at number five, the Times placed it lower, including behind one book billed as “a behind-the-scenes look at the daytime talk show ‘The View,'” which is seventh. “It should have been number five, except they excluded a big chunk of her sales for being sketchy. They’ve declared shenanigans,” one longtime book editor told TheDCNF also on the condition of anonymity. According to BookScan data, Jarrett’s book “Finding My Voice: My Journey to the West Wing and the Path Forward,” sold 12,600 copies in its first week, more than twice as many as the book ranked immediately above it on NYT’s list. The books in NYT’s fifth through 13th slots sold between 4,300 and 9,000 copies. NYT creates its own estimate of book sales from sampling book stores and also adjusts placements higher or lower for various reasons. NYT did not return a request for comment.

Even more baffling to book world insiders, the Publishers Weekly bestsellers list, which is based on BookScan data, omitted Jarrett’s book from their list of top 25 titles, even though it seemingly should have been seventh. “This is the first time that I’ve seen a book that doesn’t show up on the PW list but when you drill into BookScan, you see that it had sales that should have been there,” president of the conservative book publisher Regnery, Marji. The book editor that requested anonymity told TheDCNF: “We all know that when Bookscan excludes a book, then it’s been left off because of something sketchy, a bunch of bulk sales or an unusual geographic spread.” Ross, said. The first industry expert added, “There are some industry sources who don’t think she should be on the list because of fraudulent reporting.” NPD, the company that compiles the BookScan data, did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Publishers Weekly. Publicists with Jarrett’s book publisher, Viking, who normally are proactively engaged with the media around a book launch, did not return request for comment on behalf of itself and Jarrett.

https://www.dailycaller.com/2019/04/14/valerie-jarrett-book-manipulation/
 

hammerhead

Morphing
Gold Chaser
Sr Site Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
7,406
Likes
8,607
Location
On a speck of dust
Obama Adviser’s Book Is Ranked 1,030 On Amazon. How Did It Make NYT’s Best Seller List?

Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s book is number 1,030 on Amazon with only three reviews, but is on the NYT Best Seller list. An industry insider said that was “inconceivable” and that Jarrett likely paid a company that helps authors buy their way onto the list.
One such company buys 10,000 copies of an author’s book and tries to prevent bestseller lists from realizing the sales aren’t organic, in which case the book may be moved down or taken off the list.
There were 12,600 reported sales of Jarrett’s book, enough to rank it highly on the Publishers Weekly chart, but Publishers Weekly did not put it on its list at all.


Valerie Jarrett, a top adviser to former President Barack Obama, published a book that ranks dismally on Amazon and at Barnes and Noble, but was placed on The New York Times Best Seller list. Anomalies around the book’s sales figures in industry databases have some in the book business questioning whether Jarrett, who’s rumored to have received a million-dollar-plus advance, paid a company to game the numbers. Her book, which was published April 2, is number 1,030 on Amazon’s list of top sellers and has only three reviews on the site. It similarly ranks 1,244 on Barnes and Noble where signed copies are being sold for less than the suggested retail for unsigned copies.

Yet the book was also 14th on the NYT bestseller list. “Given the organic sales of that book and the fact that during the entire week of rollout it barely cracked the top 100 on Amazon, there’s no way the book should have a place on the NYT Best Seller list. Inconceivable,” one prominent book industry insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “There’s likely an effort to game the system, it’s the only explanation.“

Jarrett’s book outsold all but the top four books on the NYT list, according to BookScan, which tracks sales figures. But instead of putting it at number five, the Times placed it lower, including behind one book billed as “a behind-the-scenes look at the daytime talk show ‘The View,'” which is seventh. “It should have been number five, except they excluded a big chunk of her sales for being sketchy. They’ve declared shenanigans,” one longtime book editor told TheDCNF also on the condition of anonymity. According to BookScan data, Jarrett’s book “Finding My Voice: My Journey to the West Wing and the Path Forward,” sold 12,600 copies in its first week, more than twice as many as the book ranked immediately above it on NYT’s list. The books in NYT’s fifth through 13th slots sold between 4,300 and 9,000 copies. NYT creates its own estimate of book sales from sampling book stores and also adjusts placements higher or lower for various reasons. NYT did not return a request for comment.

Even more baffling to book world insiders, the Publishers Weekly bestsellers list, which is based on BookScan data, omitted Jarrett’s book from their list of top 25 titles, even though it seemingly should have been seventh. “This is the first time that I’ve seen a book that doesn’t show up on the PW list but when you drill into BookScan, you see that it had sales that should have been there,” president of the conservative book publisher Regnery, Marji. The book editor that requested anonymity told TheDCNF: “We all know that when Bookscan excludes a book, then it’s been left off because of something sketchy, a bunch of bulk sales or an unusual geographic spread.” Ross, said. The first industry expert added, “There are some industry sources who don’t think she should be on the list because of fraudulent reporting.” NPD, the company that compiles the BookScan data, did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Publishers Weekly. Publicists with Jarrett’s book publisher, Viking, who normally are proactively engaged with the media around a book launch, did not return request for comment on behalf of itself and Jarrett.

https://www.dailycaller.com/2019/04/14/valerie-jarrett-book-manipulation/
KIMG0828.JPG

Marked down at Barnes and Noble a month after initial publication but claimed to be #1.
 

Attachments

Thecrensh

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
6,590
Likes
8,749
Obama Adviser’s Book Is Ranked 1,030 On Amazon. How Did It Make NYT’s Best Seller List?

Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s book is number 1,030 on Amazon with only three reviews, but is on the NYT Best Seller list. An industry insider said that was “inconceivable” and that Jarrett likely paid a company that helps authors buy their way onto the list.
One such company buys 10,000 copies of an author’s book and tries to prevent bestseller lists from realizing the sales aren’t organic, in which case the book may be moved down or taken off the list.
There were 12,600 reported sales of Jarrett’s book, enough to rank it highly on the Publishers Weekly chart, but Publishers Weekly did not put it on its list at all.


Valerie Jarrett, a top adviser to former President Barack Obama, published a book that ranks dismally on Amazon and at Barnes and Noble, but was placed on The New York Times Best Seller list. Anomalies around the book’s sales figures in industry databases have some in the book business questioning whether Jarrett, who’s rumored to have received a million-dollar-plus advance, paid a company to game the numbers. Her book, which was published April 2, is number 1,030 on Amazon’s list of top sellers and has only three reviews on the site. It similarly ranks 1,244 on Barnes and Noble where signed copies are being sold for less than the suggested retail for unsigned copies.

Yet the book was also 14th on the NYT bestseller list. “Given the organic sales of that book and the fact that during the entire week of rollout it barely cracked the top 100 on Amazon, there’s no way the book should have a place on the NYT Best Seller list. Inconceivable,” one prominent book industry insider, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “There’s likely an effort to game the system, it’s the only explanation.“

Jarrett’s book outsold all but the top four books on the NYT list, according to BookScan, which tracks sales figures. But instead of putting it at number five, the Times placed it lower, including behind one book billed as “a behind-the-scenes look at the daytime talk show ‘The View,'” which is seventh. “It should have been number five, except they excluded a big chunk of her sales for being sketchy. They’ve declared shenanigans,” one longtime book editor told TheDCNF also on the condition of anonymity. According to BookScan data, Jarrett’s book “Finding My Voice: My Journey to the West Wing and the Path Forward,” sold 12,600 copies in its first week, more than twice as many as the book ranked immediately above it on NYT’s list. The books in NYT’s fifth through 13th slots sold between 4,300 and 9,000 copies. NYT creates its own estimate of book sales from sampling book stores and also adjusts placements higher or lower for various reasons. NYT did not return a request for comment.

Even more baffling to book world insiders, the Publishers Weekly bestsellers list, which is based on BookScan data, omitted Jarrett’s book from their list of top 25 titles, even though it seemingly should have been seventh. “This is the first time that I’ve seen a book that doesn’t show up on the PW list but when you drill into BookScan, you see that it had sales that should have been there,” president of the conservative book publisher Regnery, Marji. The book editor that requested anonymity told TheDCNF: “We all know that when Bookscan excludes a book, then it’s been left off because of something sketchy, a bunch of bulk sales or an unusual geographic spread.” Ross, said. The first industry expert added, “There are some industry sources who don’t think she should be on the list because of fraudulent reporting.” NPD, the company that compiles the BookScan data, did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Publishers Weekly. Publicists with Jarrett’s book publisher, Viking, who normally are proactively engaged with the media around a book launch, did not return request for comment on behalf of itself and Jarrett.

https://www.dailycaller.com/2019/04/14/valerie-jarrett-book-manipulation/
Saw that...major BS right there. Just goes to show corruption is in EVERYTHING. We may literally have to burn the system down and start over.