The last we heard about Sidney Powell, conservatives were scratching their heads about a story concerning her defense in Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against her.
According to news reports, Powell’s attorneys were embarking on a surprising defense: that what she’d said about Dominion Voting Systems was so outrageous, so downright crazy, that “no reasonable person” would believe it. And if people don’t believe what she’s been saying, then how can Dominion be damaged in any significant way? (Good question; I can almost hear the gavel pounding and the judge saying, “Case dismissed!”)
But when Trump supporters who distrusted the outcome in states with electronic voting systems, particularly Dominion’s, heard about this defense strategy, many had a hard time with it. Pundits accused Powell of shooting holes through her own theory of election cheating in order to avoid Dominion’s retaliation. I didn’t think she was doing that at all, and said as much. Considering that Dominion itself had called her claims “outrageous,” etc., she appeared to be turning that around on them. Little did we know the media had gotten the story wrong.
Powell is Back
Powell is back, in an interview on Rumble with Dinesh D’Souza. Please keep in mind that most media platforms will not allow any examination of the 2020 election, let alone an interview with Sidney Powell that specifically discusses Dominion Voting Systems, so the difficulty in finding her has nothing to do with her believability, only with the realities of censorship and “cancel culture” in 2021.
In Part 1, D’Souza introduces Powell as the attorney for Michael Flynn; recall that she completely upended the non-defense that Flynn had been receiving and helped him change his plea from guilty to not guilty, and hijinks ensued. We all stood up and cheered that Flynn, after being so abused by the FBI and Obama White House, was finally getting the mother-bear defense he deserved.
Recall that even when the Justice Department finally withdrew the case against him, Judge Emmet Sullivan wouldn’t let it go and weirdly continued to act as prosecutor. It took a pardon from President Trump to stick a fork in this overbaked case. My point: Sidney Powell is one powerhouse attorney. As D’Souza points out, she’s been the lead attorney in over 500 federal appeals, 350 of these as assistant U.S. attorney, in addition to her many other credentials. She’s well known for her book Licensed to Lie.
She does not back down, and she is no crackpot. So when my team and I accepted the odd story about her defense, it was because we assumed there must be a method to her madness.
The Stuff We’re “Not Supposed to Talk About”
D’Souza begins the interview by saying, “We’re gonna talk about all the stuff we’re ‘not supposed to talk about’” because “the digital moguls have decided that we can’t.” And then they do.
He repeats the argument on the left, notably from CNN’s Jake Tapper, that Powell’s defense against Dominion is “a big win for his [Tapper’s] side” because it means that what she’d been saying about Dominion was opinion, not fact. He asks her flat-out if she’s backtracking from what she’d said in the beginning about Dominion.
And she says that no, she isn’t. She is taking back nothing in her original claims.
The Data Does Not Lie
She says that news reports referring to her DC Circuit case have misquoted a statement from the decision or have taken it out of context. In other words — who would believe it? — reporters got it wrong.
It’s not what I said at all, she tells D’Souza. No, I firmly believe everything I said was true. It was based on thousands of pages of affidavits, expert reports, mathematical analysis that cannot be challenged, statistical work that cannot be challenged. I mean, the data does not lie.
Let me make it clear, I’m simply passing along what Sidney Powell is saying about her personal belief that there was widespread fraud. It is a fact that she believes this, and what I say here is a correction to a previous widely-reported story that falsely suggested she doesn’t. I do not have hard evidence that widespread fraud changed the outcome of the election, but Sidney Powell claims it’s there, and I’m quoting her.
She accuses NBC of reporting “a bald-faced lie” when they said she doesn’t believe what she had said about Dominion.
It’s a complete mischaracterization of what we said in our pleading and what I believe and know to be the truth. I’m not backin’ up one inch.
Everything I said about Dominion, I had a factual basis for, she continues. Any reasonable person looking at the evidence I’ve seen would have to come to the same conclusion.
The interview is divided into four parts. Here’s Part 2, which includes her claims about voting machines “weighing” votes differently — she said this should have resulted in a federal criminal investigation — and also what she called orchestrated foreign interference.
In Part 3, they discuss why evidence of fraud hasn’t been examined. She says she’s “beyond disappointed in the Department of Justice” and that President Trump had “a failure of nerve.” Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic and Moral Issues of Our Day.
Finally, in Part 4, they discuss the heartbreak of what’s actually happening in America.
The GOP is part of the swamp, she says at one point. Neither the campaign nor the RNC were interested in challenging the results of the election. Everyone just wanted to pack it up and go home. It was the most horrible situation I’ve ever personally witnessed…in any sort of pursuit of truth or justice.
It lays out in more detail what she was telling D’Souza in their interview. The Dominion case, she says, has no merit because it’s going after her for her legal opinion, an opinion that she claims is based on evidence that she presented to four different courts. As such, her statements are “not subject to to challenge under defamation law.”
And she says she did not say that ‘no reasonable person’ would believe her claims.
The page also includes a statement from her attorney, Howard Kleinhendler, which accuses the media of “cutting and pasting” portions of their motion to dismiss the Dominion complaint. He concludes:
In short, the legal standard of a technical legal defense crafted by the court has been improperly manipulated by the media to tell a false narrative. Ms. Powell is not backing down or retracting her previous statements concerning Dominion. Dominion’s case lacks legal merit and should be dismissed in its entirety. Any suggestion, her attorney says, that ‘no reasonable person’ would believe Ms. Powell or her comments on the election is false.
News outlets are staying faaaaar away from Sidney Powell’s claims, so you won’t see her cropping up on most shows. (Fortunately, Rumble is one of those brave platforms that support free speech and won’t “cancel” a story about election fraud.) Perhaps the best way to stay updated on her litigation is to check periodically here.
And, of course, we’ll be on it.
Mike Huckabee is the former governor of Arkansas and longtime conservative commentator on issues in culture and current events. A New York Times best-selling author, he hosts the weekly talk show Huckabeeon TBN.
Originally published on MikeHuckabee.com. Reprinted with permission.
Today, Sidney and her amazing legal team filed a brief that will no doubt attract media coverage. We want you to know the truth and the reasons behind all of this so you can feel confident in Sidney and Team Kraken and also so that you can explain it to your friends and family who only have time to skim headlines.
There is a lot of behind-the-scenes legal work being done and more filings coming in the weeks ahead. We will always try to get you the facts so that you don't fall into the drain from the spin cycle.
As Sidney wrote recently: There is no way we can avoid horrid press. That's what they do. We stay calm and carry on.
Here is background and a statement on the filing, we will have more for you later tonight. Stay tuned!!
1- A Motion to Strike Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers' unpredicated, untimely and purely political attempt to get sanctions against Team Kraken was filed today.
Here is Sidney's statement on the Wisconsin motion:
Thursday, April 8, 2021
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SIDNEY POWELL'S STATEMENT ON DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC'S MOTION TO DISMISS GOVERNOR TONY EVER'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
We moved to strike Governor Evers' Motion for Sanctions against us because it was without predicate, it was filed over two months after the Seventh Circuit dismissed and ordered the opinion vacated as moot, and long after the district court entered its order vacating its decision. In short, Governor Evers sought sanctions as a publicity and political tactic and for harassment-not based on law.
To put his actions into perspective, this is the same governor who illegally tried to postpone Wisconsin's April 2020 primary election, only to be struck down by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The rules and law do not extend time for filing motions "to infinity and beyond" * to harass a plaintiff in what amounts to nothing more than political grandstanding.
A second motion was filed today by Sidney and her lawyers. This one has to do with a defamation claim and a conspiracy allegation that Smartmatic has filed against Sidney personally for more than $2 billion in New York.
Smartmatic is a multinational company that has long worked with and provided software and equipment to Dominion.
Sidney is asking the court to dismiss this complaint.
Here are four reasons why it should be dismissed.
Thursday, April 8, 2021
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SIDNEY POWELL’S STATEMENT ON HER
MOTION TO DISMISS SMARTMATIC’S COMPLAINT
Today, I responded to Smartmatic’s allegations of defamation against me in a 25-page motion to dismiss the case. I asked the court to throw out the case for the following reasons (amongst others).
1. To start, I cannot be sued in New York, because I do not have sufficient contacts with New York. My appearances on Fox News do not give the state of New York jurisdiction over me. I do not live in New York. I do not own property in New York. I do not conduct business in New York.
2. Even if I could be sued in New York, Smartmatic’s defamation claims against me fail. The information I shared about the Smartmatic machines is backed by sworn affidavits, expert reports, and other corroborated evidence. The First Amendment protects my statements about Smartmatic—they are political speech and were made in connection with active litigation.
3. Smartmatic’s desperate attempt to suggest I was a part of a civil conspiracy to harm the company is not only false, but also, still does not allow me to be sued in New York. Smartmatic fails to even remotely allege any way that I was a part of a conspiracy. And for the record, I was not.
4. Finally, my statements at issue all concerned the 2020 presidential election. They were made in court filings and on news shows. These statements would be understood by readers and listeners as expressions of opinion by me as a legal advocate, based on reliable, corroborated, sworn testimony.
I stand by my statements about Smartmatic today. I believe every allegation I have made about Smartmatic and the vulnerability of these machines is true. This case is meritless and should be thrown out entirely.
Mail-in ballots in their envelopes await processing at the Los Angeles County Registrar Recorders' mail-in ballot processing center in Pomona, Calif., on Oct. 28, 2020. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)MORE ELECTION INTEGRITY
Election Fraud Prosecution at an ‘All-Time High’: Texas Attorney General’s Office
An official in Texas’ Attorney General’s office testified during a state House hearing that the number of election fraud cases in Texas is at an “all-time high.”
The amount is “higher than our historical average by a long shot,” said Jonathan White, the head of the election fraud agency within the Texas Attorney General’s Special Prosecution Division, to the Texas House Elections Committee last week, reported The Texan.
When asked by a state lawmaker if there were trends in election fraud prosecutions, White said that “have 510 offenses pending against 43 defendants in court right now,” saying it’s “for several reasons probably.” He did not elaborate.
White said that about 80 percent of those pending cases involve alleged mail-in ballot fraud, and 60 percent of resolved cases involved mail-in voting.
The attorney general’s office prosecuted 534 election fraud-related cases committed by 155 people since 2005, according to the report.
“I think we could both agree that 99.9 percent of people are honest and forthright, they don’t cheat at elections. They don’t go around murdering people or committing aggravated robberies, either,” White said in the hearing.
Last week, the Republican-led Texas state Senate approved legislation that would ban mail-in ballot drop boxes and most drive-thru voting, a measure that Republicans say “ensures election integrity.” Democrats have said it’s voter suppression and makes it harder for people with disabilities and ethnic minorities to vote.
The measure, according to state Sen. Bryan Hughes, a Republican, is “designed to address areas through process where bad actors can take advantage because we want the people of Texas to be confident their elections are fair, honest, and open.” The legislation “standardizes and clarifies” voting rules so “every Texan has a fair and equal opportunity to vote, regardless of where they live in the state.”
It also will require voters who have disabilities to prove that they can’t access polls in person in order to qualify for a mail-in ballot, and would also require authorization from top state leaders to be alerted about any private funding of more than $1,000 that is given to election departments, according to KXAN.
Democrats said the bill will lead to voter suppression. https://m.theepochtimes.com/over-16...ested-in-march-by-texas-troopers_3759357.html
“Every eligible Texan deserves to have their voice heard at the ballot box—regardless of their race, ethnicity, disability, gender, age, income, or party. SB 7 makes it harder for every Texan to vote,” a statement from the state Democratic Party said. “We aggressively fought this bill because we know it will disenfranchise racial and ethnic minority voters and voters with disabilities, including veterans.”
Sydney Powell Mike lindel and Lin wood are doing lotta work behind the scenes. The corruption is everywhere, deep and wide.
I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. There's more to come with covid hoax too
Who should pay for elections? The correct answer is NOT Mark Zuckerberg.
This whole article is worth reading as it outlines the buckets of cash Mark dumped into cities in swing states for the purpose of bribing officials and paying thousands of poll workers. The Zuckerberg money was on top of the money that the states and cities had already budgeted. Millions of dollars were floating around to be used for one thing, steal the election. Why in the world have we allowed one private citizen this much power and control of our precious electoral process?
This is just one more aspect to the enormous ways the Left cheated.
By Natalia Mittelstadtand John Solomon 4-11-21 JUST THE NEWS
The Center for Tech and Civil Life (CTCL), a voter advocacy group funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, donated $7.4 million last year to Detroit to, among other things, "dramatically expand strategic voter education and outreach" in a blue city key to Joe Biden's 2020 election win, according to memos obtained by Just the News under an open records request.
Detroit received three grants in 2020 from CTCL for $200,000, $3,512,000, and $3,724,450, according to the records released under Michigan's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The amount augmented by more than half the city's $13 million election budget, and dwarfed it the $6.3 million in grants that CTCL gave five Wisconsin cities, a series of donations that has generated accusations that private money was wrongly used to influence state and local election judges and administrators.
The reach of Zuckerburg's money has created a backlash in some GOP states like Georgia and Arizona, where lawmakers have moved since November to ban private money from being donated to election administrators.
Phill Kline, head of the nonprofit Amistad Project, which has contested private financing of election administration in several states, said the Detroit memos show another instance in which Zuckerberg money was allowed to influence a key battleground during the 2020 election.
2- When journalism becomes propaganda.
We are sending you just a part of this article because we want you to actually see what propaganda journalism looks like.
This is NOT a straight news story about the results of a media poll. This is undisguised manipulation of the results by the writer and editors. By writing with descriptive negative words, they are painting people who have legitimate questions as stupid and insignificant; and people who should be ignored if they even attempt to fix voting laws in the states.
This may really have been written for CNN’s Harry Enten by the DNC. Or the Chinese.
Have your eyes and ears alert to this prejudicial writing, designed to intimidate and silence you.
(CNN) Harry Enten April 11 2021 — Poll of the week: A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds that 55% of Republicans falsely believe Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election was the result of illegal voting or rigging. Additionally, 60% of Republicans incorrectly agree that the election was stolen from Republican Donald Trump.
These polls are the latest to indicate that Republicans mistakenly think that the 2020 election wasn't legitimate, when it clearly was.
What's the point: Republicans have been pushing legislation at the state level to make voting at least somewhat more difficult than it was for the 2020 election. This has come in the wake of polls showing many Republicans doubt the election result. It is unclear what effect this legislation will ultimately have on future election outcomes.
What is perfectly clear, however, is that Republicans' lack of faith in our current election infrastructure is a direct result of Trump's historic efforts to undermine the legitimacy of the 2020 results.
What would actually help people have more faith in our electoral process is that if Trump and other Republicans stopped lying to their voters and admitted the truth: Biden won the election legitimately.
3- In North Carolina they passed a Voter ID law three years ago, but it is STILL not law. The law has been held up in court and lawsuits brought by the Democrat’s ever since.This week there is a trial going on over the issue.
We thought we would share with you some of the jaw dropping testimony from the Democrat’s “EXPERT” witness.
-Testimony reveals the anti-voter ID case is based on nothing but fiery rhetoric and baseless smears
-Witness charges that any "judge who votes to uphold a voter ID law is exhibiting white rage"
-But the witness admitted she didn't even read the bill before writing her "expert report”
Raleigh, N.C. – North Carolina's 2018 voter ID law is on trial this week.
The expert witness called to testify against the voter ID law admitted she hadn't read the bill before writing her report, didn't know the primary sponsor was an African American Democrat, and didn't know that the bill included seven Democratic-sponsored amendments.
Lawyers for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a left-wing legal organization, called their expert witness, Professor Carol Anderson, to testify to the law's purportedly racist intent.
But during questioning, Prof. Anderson admitted she didn't even read the bill before writing a report on it:
· Lawyer: "In preparing your report, you did not even review the text of Senate Bill 824, did you?"
· Prof. Anderson: "Not the text." [Professor Anderson did say that she listened to audio recordings of the legislative debate.]
Prof. Anderson also confirmed an admission she'd made previously, which was that she didn't know African American Democrat Joel Ford sponsored the legislation she was called upon to testify about as an expert. Her deposition reads as follows:
· Lawyer: "Do you know who Senator Joel Ford is?"
· Prof. Anderson: "No."
· Lawyer: "Do you know what it means to be a primary sponsor of a piece of legislation?"
· Prof. Anderson: "No."
· Lawyer: "Are you aware that Sen. Ford was the primary sponsor of Senate Bill 824?"
· Prof. Anderson :"No."
· Lawyer: "Are you aware that Sen. Ford is African-American?"
· Prof. Anderson: "No."
· Lawyer: "Is it your opinion that his support for Senate Bill 824 was an act of white rage?"
· Prof. Anderson: "African-Americans can have white rage."
Prof. Anderson also made the startling admission that she didn't know that Democrats offered seven amendments that were added to the final bill:
· Lawyer: "Are you aware that the N.C. General Assembly adopted seven amendments sponsored by the Democrats on Senate Bill 824?"
· Prof. Anderson: "No, I did not know that."
This "expert" testimony reveals the anti-voter ID case is based on nothing but fiery rhetoric and baseless smears. The person called upon to testify about the bill as an expert witness didn't even bother to read it before concluding that it's surely "racist."