• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

THE DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT HOAX

snoop4truth

Silver Miner
Joined
Mar 21, 2015
Messages
601
Reaction score
126
THIS POST IS A WORK IN PROGRESS.

SUMMARY:

1). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT FALSELY CLAIMS THAT RENOUNCING YOUR U.S. CITIZENSHIP USING HIS FORM "AFFIDAVIT" WILL EXEMPT YOU FROM THE APPLICATION OF ALL U.S. LAW AND EXEMPT YOU FROM ALL INCOME TAX LIABILITY. BUT, THIS IS NOT SO. UNKNOWN TO DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT, U.S. LAW (INCLUDING U.S. TAX LAW) APPLIES TO ALL HUMAN BEINGS WITHIN THE BORDERS OF ANY STATE OF THE U.S., WHETHER THEY ARE U.S. CITIZENS OR NOT AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEY CALL THEMSELVES.

2). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S CLAIMS ABOUT HIS BACKGROUND, HIS CREDENTIALS AND HIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS ARE FALSE.

3). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S CLAIMS THAT A "LAND PATENT" RENDERS YOUR REAL PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM MORTGAGE OBLIGATION, FORECLOSURE AND PROPERTY TAX LIABILITY ARE FALSE.

4). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S CLAIM THAT A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL IS "SOVEREIGN" AND THAT "WE THE PEOPLE", COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE ARE NOT "SOVEREIGN" IS FALSE.

5). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S CLAIMS THAT HE IS BECOMING A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" ARE FALSE. THIS TERM IS A COURT ROOM NICKNAME AND ACTUALLY MEANS AN ORDINARY CLIENT WHO IS REPRESENTED BY A REAL ATTORNEY IN A SINGLE CASE IN WHICH A STATUTE AUTHORIZES THAT REAL ATTORNEY TO BE PAID BY THE LOSING SIDE IF HE/SHE WINS THE CASE. THIS NICKNAME EXPIRES FOREVER AT THE END OF THE CASE. A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" HAS NO LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND NO LEGAL POWERS THAT ANY OTHER PERSON IN THE WORLD DOES NOT ALREADY HAVE (THE POWER TO HIRE A REAL ATTORNEY AND FILE A CIVIL SUIT).



I). NO FORM "AFFIDAVIT" CAN EFFECTIVELY RENOUNCE U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IT WOULD NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF IT COULD. THE LAW (INCLUDING TAX LAW) APPLIES TO NON-CITIZENS EXACTLY AS IT DOES TO CITIZENS.



ABOUT RENOUNCING U.S. CITIZENSHIP.

David Lester Straight seems sincere, well-meaning and acts as if he believes what he says about the law and government. But, he has a number of misconceptions about the law and government. So, he is unwittingly misleading his followers.

Straight recommends using his form "affidavit" to renounce U.S. citizenship which he claims will render a person exempt from the application of U.S. laws, U.S. tax obligations and U.S. financial obligations. Straight does not know that his affidavit alone will not work to renounce U.S. citizenship in the first place and would not operate to absolve a person of U.S. law, U.S. tax obligations and U.S. financial obligations even if it did work to renounce U.S. citizenship..

In "IN RE YUSKA, Bankr. Court, Iowa 2017", the court held, " [The affiant's] attempt to unilaterally declare himself free of citizenship and its responsibilities WAS ... INEFFECTIVE. HE CANNOT CONTINUE TO RESIDE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CONTINUE TO ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF CITIZENSHIP WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIMING HE IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN. 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (setting forth the ways a citizen may renounce citizenship). AN AFFIDAVIT PURPORTING TO RENOUNCE CITIZENSHIP IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNDER 8 U.S.C. § 1481, because, among other things, "A THRESHOLD REQUIREMENT UNDER THESE PROCEDURES IS THAT THE CITIZEN BE OUTSIDE THE BORDERS OF THE UNITED STATES in order for his renunciation to take effect." Duncan v. U.S. Dep't of State, No. 7:08-CV-00564, 2008 WL 4821323, at *1-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2008)." See the last 6 full paragraphs here. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_...t+continue+to+reside+here"&hl=en&as_sdt=40003

Further, the law applies exactly the same to citizens as non-citizens, state citizens or non-state citizens, U.S. citizens or non-U.S. citizens, legal aliens and illegal aliens. Status changes nothing whatsoever. Travel.state.gov puts it this way, "Persons who wish to renounce U.S. citizenship should be aware of the fact that RENUNCIATION OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP MAY HAVE NO EFFECT ON THEIR U.S. TAX OR MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS (contact the Internal Revenue Service or U.S. Selective Service for more information). In addition, THE ACT OF RENOUNCING U.S. CITIZENSHIP DOES NOT ALLOW PERSONS TO AVOID POSSIBLE PROSECUTION FOR CRIMES WHICH THEY MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR MAY COMMIT IN THE FUTURE WHICH VIOLATE U.S. LAW, or escape the repayment of financial obligations, including child support payments, previously incurred in the United States or incurred as United States citizens abroad. "https://travel.state.gov/content/tr...nship/Renunciation-US-Nationality-Abroad.html.

So, there is no advantage in attempting to renounce U.S. citizenship whatsoever.
https://goldismoney2.com/threads/th...on-of-the-sixteenth-amendment-in-1913.440958/.


2). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S BACKGROUND, CREDENTIALS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS ARE FALSE.

More importantly, Straight has fabricated at least part, if not all of his his background, credentials (former special forces, former secret service, former deputy sheriff, member of presidential task force, gets people out prison, etc.) and all of his legal alleged victories (personally recovered 250 children wrongfully kidnapped by the CPS and responsible for drafting the paperwork that resulted in 800 court victories, referring to his worthless affidavit).

Click here for David Lester Straight's alleged credentials and qualifications. http://austinmeetinggroup.com/david-straight/

So, not only do we have a competence problem, we also have a character and integrity problem. Straight has a lot in common with other amateur legal theorists who make similar claims below.

I am an attorney with access to information which others do not have. Straight's history of all-out war against our federal, state and local governments goes back for decades and is a matter of record. I have copies of that record. There is no mention in that entire record that Straight was ever a Navy Seal, secret service agent, a deputy sheriff, a member of a Presidential Task Force, etc. If more be necessary, Straight's anti-government conduct as reflected in his record disqualifies him for governmental employment IN ANY CAPACITY, much less in a law enforcement capacity whereby he would be issued a firearm.

Moreover, Straight claims to have authored the "paperwork" which has resulted in 800 legal victories in court (a reference to his ineffective "affidavit" renouncing U.S. citizenship). As an attorney, I can assure you that is claim is false. Straight mistakenly believes that his "affidavit" is effective to renounce U.S. citizenship (something not true when the person renouncing citizenship is standing on U.S. soil). Further, Straight mistakenly believes that renouncing U.S. citizenship makes a person exempt from U.S. law, U.S. taxes and U.S. debts. But, none of this is so. Non-citizens are treated exactly the same as citizens under the law. That means Straight's premise is so fatally flawed, his "paperwork" could not possibly result in legal victories of any type. Suffice it to say, Straight NEVER authored any "paperwork" which resulted in 800 legal victories in court.

Finally, Straight claims to have recovered 250 children from Child Protective Services. (Straight lost his own children to CPS early in his adult life which explains the genesis of his hatred for government). Straight claims he achieves this miraculous success by threatening to report CPS officials for imaginary crimes that he mistakenly believes they commit in the performance of their duties protecting children. But, CPS officials do not commit the crimes that Straight believes they commit. As an attorney, I can assure you that this release of 250 children NEVER occurred. Only a judge can release a child from CPS (not CPS officials threatened with extortion) and Straight is forbidden to even speak to a judge in a CPS case (unless the children in question are his own and Straight does not have 250 children). Suffice it to say that Straight NEVER caused 250 children to be released from CPS. NEVER.

I am an attorney who investigates fake legal gurus, like those below. In my experience, I have concluded that EVERY FAKE LEGAL EXPERT ASSUMES QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE AND CREDENTIALS THEY DO NOT ACTUALLY HAVE to dupe their followers into believing them.

DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT IS NO DIFFERENT FROM ALL THE REST OF THEM!


Examples:

Rodney DALE Class pretended to be "Judge DALE (retired)" when writing FAKE legal books which revealed FAKE legal information about a FAKE legal system which does not exist. Class currently claims to be a "private attorney general" (which, unknown to Class, actually means the "civil rights" client of an attorney in federal court) and a "14th amendment, section 4 bounty hunter" (which, unknown to Class, actually means a Civil War soldier who enlisted in the Union Army to collect an enlistment bonus, then called a "bounty") . Class even wears a fraudulently-marked costume and drives a fraudulently-marked vehicle fraudulently indicating such. In reality, Class is a multi-convicted, weapons-related felon who is on the U.S. terrorist watch list who has a long history of mental illness for which he has been repeatedly and involuntarily incarcerated in mental institutions. Class has lost every single case in which he has ever purported to represent himself or others, all 77 consecutive cases in a row. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes

Anthony Troy Williams claims to be a "private attorney general (which, unknown to Williams, actually means the "civil rights" client of an attorney in federal court) and a "sovereign peace officer" (something which does not exist). Williams actually carries a fake badge, a fake ID and wears a fake lanyard indicating such (effectively a law enforcement "costume"). In reality, Williams is a career criminal and multi-convicted felon who has lost 90 plus cases in a row and who will spend the rest of his life behind bars for charging customers thousands of dollars each for a FAKE foreclosure defense scheme which did not actually work. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...x-(Anthony-Troy-Williams)&p=231850#post231850

Debra Jones claims to be a "former policewoman", "former attorney", a medical "doctor" and even claimed that she was "groomed" by the Police Benevolent Association to be "PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES". In reality, Jones was never any of these things. She has NEVER has a professional license of any type. So, she could not possibly be a former attorney. Jones made a small fortune marketing seminars wherein she pretended to be a "legal insider" who confessed to diabolical (and imaginary) corruption inside the legal system, all while pretending to be a former police officer and a former attorney. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...uot&highlight=Debra+Jones&p=230352#post230352;

Judge Anna Von Reitz (real name Anna Maria Reizinger) claims to be a "judge". But this is not so. She is an anti-government protester who creates all-new, imaginary reasons for hating the government, all of which are utterly delusional. Von Reitz still creates and issues imaginary court decrees and imaginary court orders in her imaginary capacity as a pretend "judge". https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/12/15/interview-sovereign-judge-anna’s-world

Eddie Craig claims to be a "former deputy sheriff". But this is not so. The closest that Eddie Craig ever came to being a "former sheriff deputy" was for a period of two weeks in 1992 when he was a "PART TIME" "JAILER" in Nacogdoches County, Texas at which time, he was unceremoniously FIRED, "NOT ELIGIBLE FOR RE-HIRE". Eddie Craig has lost every case in which he has ever been involved, including all five of his own cases, one of which was his own criminal misdemeanor speeding case. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99564-Eddie-Craig-the-former-deputy-sheriff-hoax

Carl Miller (real name "Richard Champion") claims to be a "Constitutional Scholar" with a "92% winning record in court". But, this is not so. Miller is actually a multi-convicted, weapons-related career felon who has lost every single case in which he ever represented himself in court, 26 consecutive losses in a row. Miller was deemed unfit for military service and discharged from the military and has been institutionalized TWICE in mental hospitals in Michigan, once as a 14 year old child and once as an adult. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?131638-Carl-Miller-Richard-Champion

Ron Gibson claims to be a book author, "counselor at law" who is becoming a "private attorney general" (which, unknown to Gibson, actually means the "civil rights" CLIENT of an attorney in federal court), an expert in land patents and allodial title and falsely claims to have studied "Constitutional Law" in college. (Constitutional Law is only taught in Law School and not in college.). None of the forgoing is true except that Gibson has organized and written some legally erroneous material on land patents and allodial title which he refers to as his "book". Click here and scroll down to the bottom of the page. https://josephfarleyshow.com/2019/02/21/what-you-need-to-know-about-land-patents-ron-gibson/

DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT IS NO DIFFERENT FROM ALL THE REST OF THEM!

All of these posers create FAKE qualifications, FAKE credentials and FAKE expertise, so that their followers will take them seriously and believe their claims. But, their qualifications and credentials are as FAKE as is their claims about the law and the legal system itself.


These posers simply tell a pack of lies to support a pack of lies.

It is an absolute disgrace.


3). A "LAND PATENT" DOES NOT EXEMPT REAL PROPERTY FROM MORTGAGE PAYMENT OBLIGATION, FORECLOSURE OR PROPERTY TAX LIABILITY.

David Lester Straight also recommends that you create and file a "land patent" which he claims will make your real property exempt from foreclosure and absolve you of the obligations to pay property taxes and fines from code violations. But, none of this is so.

A "land patent" is a document reflecting the VERY FIRST transfer of real property from a sovereign government to a private person or entity. No subsequent transfer of that real property involves a land patent. All subsequent transfers of that real property involve a deed. The maximum amount of land patents for a parcel of real property is ONE. No land patent or deed transfers real property free from the risk of eminent domain (governmental purchasing of that real property for a public purpose in exchange for "just compensation").

Likewise, no land patent or deed transfers real property free of the obligation to pay real property taxes to pay for government services which benefit the real property owner (building roads, road maintenance, drainage, fire protection, police protection, public schools, etc.). Finally, no land patent or deed makes it impossible for the owner to voluntarily encumber his/her real property with a mortgage transferred to a lender as security for a loan made to the owner. So, no land patent or deed protects real property from the risk of imminent domain or property taxes and does not render real property foreclosure CONCLUSION: Land patents are completely useless and irrelevant as defenses to imminent domain, taxes and foreclosure. Land patents are only relevant to the very first party in the chain of title. SEE ACTUAL PROOF HERE!!! https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...tle-via-your-land-patent.295546/#post-1985267 [show less]


RON GIBSON AND THE ALLODIAL TITLE HOAX. https://www.goldismoney2.com/thread...tle-via-your-land-patent.295546/#post-1985267


4). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT'S CLAIMS ABOUT INDIVIDUAL "SOVEREIGNTY" ARE A HOAX

The purpose of this hoax was to make Americans think that ONLY AN "INDIVIDUAL" IS "SOVEREIGN" and that "WE the PEOPLE", COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE ARE NOT "SOVEREIGN" (exactly backwards to the truth). According to this hoax, the INDIVIDUAL (the pretend "sovereign") is not bound by laws made by representatives that "We the People" (the REAL "sovereign") ELECT to make them. But, none of this is so.

In nations ruled by a King or Queen, the word "SOVEREIGN" means the King or Queen. But, in nations ruled by THE PEOPLE, the word "SOVEREIGN" means ALL OF THE PEOPLE, COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, not the single "INDIVIDUAL" AS A TINY PART OF THE WHOLE.

This means that here in the United States, "We the People", COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE legally stand in the shoes of the Kings and Queens of yesteryear and we COLLECTIVELY rule ourselves, But here in the United States, no single INDIVIDUAL among us is "SOVEREIGN" and no single INDIVIDUAL among us stands in the shoes of the Kings or Queens of yesteryear and no single INDIVIDUAL can rule anything. FOR PROOF, SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN TO POST #108 HERE. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...PONIZED-WEATHER-FIRES-and-DEPOPULATION)/page4

The mistaken belief that the "INDIVIDUAL" is "SOVEREIGN" is the result of amateur legal theorists being unable to read. They are unable to distinguish between SINGULAR and PLURAL terms. When they read the phrase, "We the People" (both of which are PLURAL terms), they mistakenly interpret it as the phrase, "I the Person" (both of which are SINGULAR terms). But, this is not so.

The phrase, "We the People" refers to ALL OF US, COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, SPEAKING WITH A SINGLE VOICE THROUGH OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, not the single INDIVIDUAL speaking individually as a tiny part of the whole.

Likewise, when amateur legal theorists read the phrase, "consent of the governed", they mistakenly think that it refers to a single INDIVIDUAL person (AS IF ONLY ONE INDIVIDUAL IN THE ENTIRE NATION IS "GOVERNED" BY THE GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE"). This is why they mistakenly think that every single INDIVIDUAL in the nation must INDIVIDUALLY "CONSENT" to the law, to the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies and to the jurisdiction of the courts in order for them to govern that INDIVIDUAL. But, this is not so.

"We the People" (both of which are PLURAL terms) "CONSENT" to our government COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, not INDIVIDUALLY outside the election process.

Indeed, Thomas Jefferson himself said, "IT IS BY THEIR (a plural term) VOTES (a plural term) THAT THE PEOPLE (a plural term) exercise THEIR (also a plural term) SOVEREIGNTY.

"DEFINITION OF "SOVEREIGN":
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDiction...nate person,obedience to any human superior."

DEFINITION OF "SOVEREIGNTY" http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDiction...ty Definition:,the reach of international law.

DEFINITION OF "THE GOVERNED" (as in "consent of the governed"). Note that the term "the governed' (below) IS ALSO A PLURAL TERM (not an INDIVIDUAL term). https://www.dictionary.com/browse/c...ent of the governed,democracy, and John Locke.)

5). DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT WILL NEVER BE A "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" AND IT WOULD NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF HE DID.

FAKE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" VIDEOS
https://wsvn.com/news/investigation...hat-feds-call-mortgage-debt-reduction-scheme/
FAKE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL" NEWS ARTICLES
https://wsvn.com/news/sovereign-peace-officer-arrested-after-refusing-to-remove-hat/
https://wsvn.com/news/sovereign-citizen-busted-for-practicing-law-without-a-license/
https://wsvn.com/news/sovereign-citizens-use-delays-and-distractions-to-clog-south-florida-courts/
https://www.justice.gov/usao-hi/pr/...connection-fraudulent-mortgage-debt-reduction http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/Arti...Mortgage-Scam-from-Restaurant-Row-Office.aspx

BEWARE OF THESE OTHER FAKE LEGAL EXPERTS (all of whom have a 100% failure rate in court when representing themselves and when pretending to represent others)

For the hoaxes of ROD CLASS (who has LOST 77 consecutive cases in a row), click here.http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes

For the hoaxes of EDDIE CRAIG (who has LOST every case in which he has ever been involved), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99564-Eddie-Craig-the-former-deputy-sheriff-hoax

For the hoaxes of ANTHONY WILLIAMS (who has LOST 90+ consecutive cases in a row), click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...x-(Anthony-Troy-Williams)&p=231850#post231850

For the hoaxes of CARL MILLER (who has LOST 28 consecutive cases in a row), click here.https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?131638-Carl-Miller-Richard-Champion

For the hoaxes of DEBRA JONES (who have never won or lost a single case), click here.https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...uot&highlight=Debra+Jones&p=230352#post230352;\

For the hoaxes of DEBORAH TAVARES (who has never won or lost a single case), click here.https://www.waccobb.net/forums/show...ather-fires-depopulation)&p=226016#post226016
 

Bigjon

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Midas Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,777
Reaction score
4,783
blablabla

Slavery is illegal. Period, end of story, especially your lying crap.