A U.S. congressman from Georgia re-tweeted the tweet of the Nadler video. It would be nice if Nadler is prodded about this until he admits he has been lying and that he knows full well what is taking place in various cities. Lying scum need to be held accountable.
I don’t call that “curvy”. I know many curvy women. That is just “big”, “thick”, overweight, obese, and fat.
ETA: Her body type is a rectangle. Curvy implies an hourglass shape where bust and hips are about the same but the waist is proportionately smaller. Think Jennifer Lopez proportions. Plus models are usually more proportionate than this.
Yeah, they say pretty much what they can imagine, put it in print and the sheep drink it up. You can't really blame them. Many people are extremely stupid and believe everything they read. We share the planet with fucking idiots and someday we'll need to start purging them, or they'll purge us
BREAKING: Nick Sandmann’s Lawyer Releases Fiery Statement To Get CNN’s Brian Stelter Fired For ‘Breach Of Confidentiality’
‘Brian Stelter is a liar. I know how to deal with liars,’ Sandmann’s attorney Lin Wood warned the CNN host.
Covington Catholic student Nicholas Sandmann’s lawyer, Lin Wood, accused CNN’s Brian Stelter of breaching a confidentiality agreement Friday after the host retweeted speculation on the settlement. The accusation comes hours after Sandmann settled a $250M lawsuit with the Washington Post.
Stelter retweeted a comment from attorney Mark S. Zaid commenting on Sandmann’s defamation case Thursday.
“Those with zero legal experience (as far as I can tell) should not be conjecturing on lawsuits they know nothing about. What kind of journalism is that?” Zaid asked. “I’ve litigated defamation cases. [Sandmann] was undoubtedly paid nuisance value settlement & nothing more.”
CNN's @BrianStelter is being accused of breaching network's confidentiality agreement with @N1ckSandmann and it 'May cost him his job' according to @LLinWood
San Francisco police told to display Black Lives Matter banners in support of terrorists who want to eliminate cops
Despite calls from the domestic terrorist group to defund and disband the police, Black Lives Matter (BLM) will now have a presence at every police station in San Francisco, thanks to a recent vote by the San Francisco Police Commission (SFPC).
Moving forward, San Francisco police stations will now be required to display BLM posters inside their facilities, defying strong opposition from union members. To keep the BLM mob happy, each police station will have to find and put up a poster at least 32 by 24 inches in size, and they will have 30 days to do so before being in violation of the order.
“The poster must ‘prominently and exclusively’ feature the phrase ‘Black lives matter’ and it must be displayed in a place visible to station visitors,” reports indicate about the resolution, which was unanimously approved by the SFPC.
To placate those who expressed outrage that the department would vote to support a radical domestic terrorist group that is linked to violence against innocent people, the decision was made to allow the posters to say “Black lives matter,” without a capital “L” or “M” to sound more generic.
“This came directly from the community,” claims Commissioner Dion-Jay Brookter, who helped co-write the resolution. “We need to show unity and solidarity and say that black lives do matter. My life matters. My five-year-old niece’s life matters.”
San Francisco Police Officers Association expresses concerns, says pushing political agendas “establishes a new precedent”
Police Chief Bill Scott, who also has black skin, indicated his support for the resolution as well. In Scott’s view, stating publicly that black lives matter is a great way to show the world that San Francisco police officers are supportive of people with darker skin tones.
“As I have said before, people are talking to us and we have to listen. Yeah, we’re listening. Yes, we will support,” he is quoted as saying.
“Yes, we are fully committed to implementing this resolution, and as the person who is charged with speaking on behalf of the department – and I can speak for the command staff and members of this department – black lives do matter, and they matter to this police department.”
The San Francisco Police Officers Association, on the other hand, issued a letter of opposition to the proposal, warning that it “establishes a new precedent that raises concerns about introducing political agendas and wedge issues into the safe harbor of police stations.”
Rockne A. Lucia, a lawyer for this union, publicly emphasized that police stations are supposed to be places where citizens of all skin colors are free to seek help and assistance when they become victims of criminal activity. Police stations are not supposed to be “places for political endorsements or alignment with political organizations,” Lucia warned.
Police union president Tony Montoya agrees, having said in a statement that the San
Francisco Police Department needs to put away all “soapboxes” and stop its “political grandstanding.”
As it turns out, San Francisco saw a 31 percent increase in homicides last month compared to the same month last year. Car break-ins have also become “rampant,” Montoya warns, emphasizing the fact that police officers throughout the city need to be focused on stopping crime, not perpetuating political movements.
“It’s time for the commissioners to get beyond hashtags, posters, and politics because our community is depending on them and all of us to make San Francisco a safer place for everyone,” Montoya further stated.
I can only imagine their meeting before the hearing. All the D's are gathered in the lockerroom w/ the POS Speaker of the House giving them their pep talk/game plan - "If he has the gall to attempt to speak immeadiatley reclaim your time. Under nO circumstances are you to tet him make any comments that the right might like! Accuse him of disrespect, smear his integrity and deny any facts he presents. DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR????"