One thing that all chartists need to understand is how it sows the seeds of it's own destruction.

Today it's "the wave seems to be going this way so hop on and hope for the best". At least that's my interpretation.

- Home
- Forums
- Metals and Survival Related.
- Gold Silver (All things Metal)
- PM Trading/Stocks/Technical Analysis

- Thread starter Zed
- Start date

One thing that all chartists need to understand is how it sows the seeds of it's own destruction.

Today it's "the wave seems to be going this way so hop on and hope for the best". At least that's my interpretation.

On the flip side the market may end up forcing the Chinese into a currency devaluation. I know that the Chinese have restrained BTC holding but if the rank and file wake up to this possibility in the Yuan the easy play might be BTC. The 20K+ BTC spike was made in China so watch that space.

++ for gold, now easier to buy than BTC for Chinese.

Feel free to expand that one if you want.

According to this source, (forgive me I know nothing about roulette), in American roulette the house "edge" is 5.26%. This means with a perfectly "fair" (not rigged) roulette table, over time the house will win 5.26% more than they lose. Their goal is to get you to play roulette more and faster so that they can exploit their mathematical edge.

https://www.rouletteonline.net/odds/

In Weekend Trend Trader, Nick Radge says a few words about expectancy:

Speaking of a "proven mathematical edge".... Since Nick's (and my) strategy is programmable it is possible to backtest using historical data to see what would have been the outcome in the past. Once a positive outcome is identified in the historical data, then if one assumes that in the long run the future will look more or less like the past then a positive expectancy can be exploited.

I ran my programmed strategy against every symbol in the S&P 400 one at a time by hand. I let the strategy work with all data from all symbols as far back as the TradingView platform had data. While there are some limitations in how I tested, including survivorship bias, and inability to test as a portfolio, the results should still mostly be valid. In any case, Nick did test and eliminated the problems I mentioned and shared the results in the Weekend Trend Trader book.

I tabulated the results from my strategy against the S&P400. The Actual results were that the strategy won (I won) 57% of the trades. I lost 42% of the trades. My average win was $2851. My average loss was -$752.21. My win/loss ration was 3.79. That means that for every dollar I lost, I won $3.79. Not bad. Be the casino.

However, some of the wins were so unusually large that I assume they will not come along every day. So I pulled out all wins that were in excess of $10,000 and looked at the results without these HUGE wins.

The results w/o the huge wins were: I won 56% of the trades. I lost 44% of the trades. My average win was $1818. My average loss remained at -$752. My win/loss ratio was 2.42. This means for every dollar I lost, I won $2.42.

If I agree to play flip the coin with you, and every time I win you give me $1. But every time you win I give you $2. How long will you play with me?

I tabulated the results from my strategy against the S&P400. The Actual results were that the strategy won (I won) 57% of the trades. I lost 42% of the trades. My average win was $2851. My average loss was -$752.21. My win/loss ration was 3.79. That means that for every dollar I lost, I won $3.79. Not bad. Be the casino.

However, some of the wins were so unusually large that I assume they will not come along every day. So I pulled out all wins that were in excess of $10,000 and looked at the results without these HUGE wins.

The results w/o the huge wins were: I won 56% of the trades. I lost 44% of the trades. My average win was $1818. My average loss remained at -$752. My win/loss ratio was 2.42. This means for every dollar I lost, I won $2.42.

If I agree to play flip the coin with you, and every time I win you give me $1. But every time you win I give you $2. How long will you play with me?

Last edited:

The histogram that I keep showing is a picture of the results of this exercise. The height of the bars on the graph (bins) represent the number of trades that fell into each bin. (I made this chart by hand from the results of my testing.)

The 3 bins (bars) on the left are the losing trades. All bins to the right of those 3 represent winning trades.

This is how a bell curve is built. This is a histogram of the outcomes of all the trades made.

But there is something funny about this bell curve. It is extremely biased to the right-hand side. That is called a fat tail.

To be clear, there is nothing magic about the buy signal that my strategy uses. It's an OK buy signal. But the magic happens because the strategy always sells the losers and lets the winners ride as long as possible. Winners are only sold when price moves against us. That is the secret sauce. That is what creates the*positive expectancy*.

The 3 bins (bars) on the left are the losing trades. All bins to the right of those 3 represent winning trades.

This is how a bell curve is built. This is a histogram of the outcomes of all the trades made.

But there is something funny about this bell curve. It is extremely biased to the right-hand side. That is called a fat tail.

To be clear, there is nothing magic about the buy signal that my strategy uses. It's an OK buy signal. But the magic happens because the strategy always sells the losers and lets the winners ride as long as possible. Winners are only sold when price moves against us. That is the secret sauce. That is what creates the

Last edited:

- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010

- Messages
- 8,068

- Likes
- 15,497

I ran my programmed strategy against every symbol in the S&P 400 one at a time by hand. I let the strategy work with all data from all symbols as far back as the TradingView platform had data. While there are some limitations in how I tested, including survivorship bias, and inability to test as a portfolio, the results should still mostly be valid. In any case, Nick did test and eliminated the problems I mentioned and shared the results in the Weekend Trend Trader book.

I tabulated the results from my strategy against the S&P400. The Actual results were that the strategy won (I won) 57% of the trades. I lost 42% of the trades. My average win was $2851. My average loss was -$752.21. My win/loss ration was 3.79. That means that for every dollar I lost, I won $3.79. Not bad. Be the casino.

However, some of the wins were so unusually large that I assume they will not come along every day. So I pulled out all wins that were in excess of $10,000 and looked at the results without these HUGE wins.

The results w/o the huge wins were: I won 56% of the trades. I lost 44% of the trades. My average win was $1818. My average loss remained at -$752. My win/loss ration was 2.42. This means for every dollar I lost, I won $2.42.

If I agree to play flip the coin with you, and every time I win you give me $1. But every time you win I give you $2. How long will you play with me?

View attachment 164889

I tabulated the results from my strategy against the S&P400. The Actual results were that the strategy won (I won) 57% of the trades. I lost 42% of the trades. My average win was $2851. My average loss was -$752.21. My win/loss ration was 3.79. That means that for every dollar I lost, I won $3.79. Not bad. Be the casino.

However, some of the wins were so unusually large that I assume they will not come along every day. So I pulled out all wins that were in excess of $10,000 and looked at the results without these HUGE wins.

The results w/o the huge wins were: I won 56% of the trades. I lost 44% of the trades. My average win was $1818. My average loss remained at -$752. My win/loss ration was 2.42. This means for every dollar I lost, I won $2.42.

If I agree to play flip the coin with you, and every time I win you give me $1. But every time you win I give you $2. How long will you play with me?

View attachment 164889

If so - could be used for intraday setups as well...

An interesting question (which may not be knowable due to data restraints) is whether that system could be scaled down into smaller timeframes with similar results...

If so - could be used for intraday setups as well...

If so - could be used for intraday setups as well...

Nick does run some day trading strategies. I will share this link with the understanding that I am not connected to Nick in any way and I have no stake in Nick's business financial or otherwise. You could also search YouTube for Nick Radge as there are many good interviews where he explains what he is doing.

https://linktr.ee/thechartist

Did you try to run this on the e mini SP futures contract?

Those initial BIG moves can take some digesting, it's not unusual to see the market step back to make sure it is real before proceeding.

- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010

- Messages
- 14,020

- Likes
- 18,875

Gold 7758 Contracts with 1968 Still Open. --> Impressive for an off delivery month almost matching the Feb delivery month total!

Silver 8701 Contracts with 513 Still Open. --> Over double last December THE king delivery month.

Physical demand is still off the charts, even @ the Comex.