• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding high finance, politics, constructionist Constitution, and mental masturbation of all types"

The State of the Union: These Are Dangerous Times, and the Government Is To Blame

Scorpio

Скорпион
Founding Member
Board Elder
Site Mgr
Midas Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
28,182
Likes
36,066
#1
The State of the Union: These Are Dangerous Times, and the Government Is To Blame
John W. Whitehead


“As I look at America today, I am not afraid to say that I am afraid.”—Bertram Gross, Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America

These are dangerous times.


Mind you, when I say that these are dangerous times, it is not because of violent crime, which remains at an all-time low, or because of terrorism, which is statistically rare, or because our borders are being invaded by armies, which data reports from the Department of Homeland Security refute.


No, the real danger that we face comes from none other than the U.S. government and the powers it has granted to its standing army to steal, cheat, harass, detain, brutalize, terrorize, torture and kill.


The danger “we the people” face comes from masked invaders on the government payroll who crash through our doors in the dark of night, shoot our dogs, and terrorize our families.


This danger comes from militarized henchmen on the government payroll who demand absolute obedience, instill abject fear, and shoot first and ask questions later.


This danger comes from power-hungry bureaucrats on the government payroll who have little to no understanding of their constitutional limits.


This danger comes from greedy politicians and corporations for whom profit trumps principle.


You want to know about the state of our union? It’s downright scary.


Consider for yourself.


Americans have no protection against police abuse. It is no longer unusual to hear about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions later, such as the 16-year-old teenager who skipped school only to be shot by police after they mistook him for a fleeing burglar. Then there was the unarmed black man in Texas “who was pursued and shot in the back of the neck by Austin Police… after failing to properly identify himself and leaving the scene of an unrelated incident.” And who could forget the 19-year-old Seattle woman who was accidentally shot in the leg by police after she refused to show her hands? What is increasingly common, however, is the news that the officers involved in these incidents get off with little more than a slap on the hands.


Americans are little more than pocketbooks to fund the police state. If there is any absolute maxim by which the federal government seems to operate, it is that the American taxpayer always gets ripped off. This is true, whether you’re talking about taxpayers being forced to fund high-priced weaponry that will be used against us, endless wars that do little for our safety or our freedoms, or bloated government agencies such as the National Security Agency with its secret budgets, covert agendas and clandestine activities. Rubbing salt in the wound, even monetary awards in lawsuits against government officials who are found guilty of wrongdoing are paid by the taxpayer.


Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty. We once operated under the assumption that you were innocent until proven guilty. Due in large part to rapid advances in technology and a heightened surveillance culture, the burden of proof has been shifted so that the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty has been usurped by a new norm in which all citizens are suspects. This is exemplified by police practices of stopping and frisking people who are merely walking down the street and where there is no evidence of wrongdoing. Likewise, by subjecting Americans to full-body scans and license-plate readers without their knowledge or compliance and then storing the scans for later use, the government—in cahoots with the corporate state—has erected the ultimate suspect society. In such an environment, we are all potentially guilty of some wrongdoing or other.


Americans no longer have a right to self-defense. In the wake of various shootings in recent years, “gun control” has become a resounding theme. Those advocating gun reform see the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms as applying only to government officials. As a result, even Americans who legally own firearms are being treated with suspicion and, in some cases, undue violence. In one case, a Texas man had his home subjected to a no-knock raid and was shot in his bed after police, attempting to deliver a routine search warrant, learned that he was in legal possession of a firearm. In another incident, a Florida man who was licensed to carry a concealed firearm found himself detained for two hours during a routine traffic stop in Maryland while the arresting officer searched his vehicle in vain for the man’s gun, which he had left at home. Incidentally, the Trump Administration has done more to crack down on Second Amendment rightsthan anything the Obama Administration ever managed.


Americans no longer have a right to private property. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise, if government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property.


Americans no longer have a say about what their children are exposed to in school. Incredibly, the government continues to insist that parents essentially forfeit their rights when they send their children to a public school. This growing tension over whether young people, especially those in the public schools, are essentially wards of the state, to do with as government officials deem appropriate, in defiance of the children's constitutional rights and those of their parents, is reflected in the debate over sex education programs that expose young people to all manner of sexual practices and terminology, zero tolerance policies that strip students of any due process rights, let alone parental involvement in school discipline, and Common Core programs that teach students to be test-takers rather than critical thinkers.


Americans are powerless in the face of militarized police. In early America, citizens were considered equals with law enforcement officials. Authorities were rarely permitted to enter one’s home without permission or in a deceitful manner. And it was not uncommon for police officers to be held personally liable for trespass when they wrongfully invaded a citizen’s home. Unlike today, early Americans could resist arrest when a police officer tried to restrain them without proper justification or a warrant—which the police had to allow citizens to read before arresting them. (Daring to dispute a warrant with a police official today who is armed with high-tech military weapons and tasers would be nothing short of suicidal.) As police forces across the country continue to be transformed into outposts of the military, with police agencies acquiring military-grade hardware in droves, Americans are finding their once-peaceful communities transformed into military outposts, complete with tanks, weaponry, and other equipment designed for the battlefield.


Americans no longer have a right to bodily integrity. Court rulings undermining the Fourth Amendment and justifying invasive strip searches have left us powerless against police empowered to forcefully draw our blood, strip search us, and probe us intimately. Accounts are on the rise of individuals—men and women—being subjected to what is essentially government-sanctioned rape by police in the course of “routine” traffic stops. Remember the New Mexico man who was subjected to a 12-hour ordeal of anal probes, X-rays, enemas, and finally a colonoscopy—all because he allegedly rolled through a stop sign?


Americans no longer have a right to the expectation of privacy. Despite the staggering number of revelations about government spying on Americans’ phone calls, Facebook posts, Twitter tweets, Google searches, emails, bookstore and grocery purchases, bank statements, commuter toll records, etc., Congress, the president and the courts have done little to nothing to counteract these abuses. Instead, they seem determined to accustom us to life in this electronic concentration camp.


Americans no longer have a representative government. We have moved beyond the era of representative government and entered a new age, let’s call it the age of authoritarianism. History may show that from this point forward, we will have left behind any semblance of constitutional government and entered into a militaristic state where all citizens are suspects and security trumps freedom. Even with its constantly shifting terrain, this topsy-turvy travesty of law and government has become America’s new normal. It is not overstating matters to say that Congress, which has done its best to keep their unhappy constituents at a distance, may well be the most self-serving, semi-corrupt institution in America.


Americans can no longer rely on the courts to mete out justice. The U.S. Supreme Court was intended to be an institution established to intervene and protect the people against the government and its agents when they overstep their bounds. Yet through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency, the justices of the Supreme Court have become the architects of the American police state in which we now live, while the lower courts have appointed themselves courts of order, concerned primarily with advancing the government’s agenda, no matter how unjust or illegal.


I haven’t even touched on the corporate state, the military industrial complex, SWAT team raids, invasive surveillance technology, zero tolerance policies in the schools, overcriminalization, or privatized prisons, to name just a few, but what I have touched on should be enough to show that the landscape of our freedoms has already changed dramatically from what it once was and will no doubt continue to deteriorate unless Americans can find a way to wrest back control of their government and reclaim their freedoms.


There can be no denying that the world is indeed a dangerous place, but what you won’t hear in any State of the Union address—what the president and his cohorts fail to acknowledge—is that it’s the government that poses the gravest threat to our freedoms and way of life, and no amount of politicking, parsing or pandering will change that.


So what do we do about this dangerous state of our union?


How do we go about reclaiming our freedoms and reining in our runaway government?


Essentially, there are four camps of thought among the citizenry when it comes to holding the government accountable. Which camp you fall into says a lot about your view of government—or, at least, your view of whichever administration happens to be in power at the time.


In the first camp are those who trust the government to do the right thing, despite the government’s repeated failures in this department.


In the second camp are those who not only don’t trust the government but think the government is out to get them.


In the third camp are those who see government neither as an angel nor a devil, but merely as an entity that needs to be controlled, or as Thomas Jefferson phrased it, bound “down from mischief with the chains of the Constitution.”


Then there’s the fourth camp, comprised of individuals who pay little to no attention to the workings of government. Easily entertained, easily distracted, easily led, these are the ones who make the government’s job far easier than it should be.


It is easy to be diverted, distracted and amused by the antics of politicians, the pomp and circumstance of awards shows, athletic events, and entertainment news, and the feel-good evangelism that passes for religion today.


What is far more difficult to face up to is the reality of life in America, where unemployment, poverty, inequality, injustice and violence by government agents are increasingly norms.


As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the powers-that-be want us to remain divided, alienated from each other based on our politics, our bank accounts, our religion, our race and our value systems. Yet as George Orwell observed, “The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians.”




John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and spokesperson, in addition to writing a weekly commentary that is posted on The Rutherford Institute’s website (www.rutherford.org), as well being distributed to several hundred newspapers, and hosting a national public service radio campaign. Whitehead's aggressive, pioneering approach to civil liberties issues has earned him numerous accolades, including the Hungarian Medal of Freedom.
www.rutherford.org
 

Aurumag

Ag mirror of truth Aurum purity of mind
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
9,411
Likes
11,479
Location
State of Jefferson
#2
I am firmly entrenched in the 2nd camp.

Change my mind!
 

Bigfoot

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
3,182
Likes
3,503
#3
This is the most honest assessment of the state of the union I have heard/read.
 

Alton

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,729
Likes
8,853
Location
Michiana
#4
Of course it is an honest assessment of they way things stand with all existing laws and with the history of government legislation, government adjudication, government regulation and government policy that ALL non-elitist Americans have been subject to up to this point.

Then again, it does NOT allow for or factor in changes, however minor, made since Trump was elected. Neither does it speculate on Trump's proposed changes.

Yes. A wall CAN both keep invaders out AND keep current population IN as in the Berlin wall. Yet proponents of this argument fail to mention the abundant coast lines of the US. They fail to consider the long land and coastal border with Canada. This leaves well over 3/4 of total US border still open.

Yes. Trump has NOT YET freed America and Americans from the fed/IRS/CIA/NSA/FBI and the thousands and thousands of laws and regulations making life in America something between a bad joke and a living hell police state. Rome wasn't built in a day. Rome did not die in a day. It took 200+ years to make the US the hellhole it is today. I have every reason to think it's going to take a few more years to get a good start on unwinding a lot of the accumulated US government stupidity. Acting like a bull in china shop just ain't going to get it done. Why? Because no one learns a damned thing and all the ugliness destroyed will come back and in a worse form than what it is now. Sure, the bulls get their immediate gratification, crooks are hung or killed in the street, property is destroyed, lives are ruined and the non-participating portion of the population are left in fear, shock and horror of what was just witnessed...and they WILL have their revenge on the bull that wrecked the china shop. Look at how many people have walked away from the democratic party already! Think their numbers would have been so high were they left with the status quo? Think they would have walked away if the party, laws and policies that their senators and representatives had put together over the decades were just suddenly and brutally smashed along with their reps and sens beheaded and jailed? Sooner or later it must be realized that loyalties to stupidity, ignorance, deceit, corruption and lies MUST be broken by exposing all the aforementioned weaknesses and evils.

Yes! I will be the first to wholeheartedly agree that killing the corrupt bastards of government and wiping out ALL of their laws, regulations and policies would feel just so damned good that I would probably achieve some level of Nirvana. Yet in the wake of all that destruction I would be looked upon as monster that just went psycho.

Meanwhile those who witnessed the Wrath of Alton would NOT have changed their ways. Would NOT have changed their thinking. They would remain passive, passionless sheep willing to readily accept a return to what they have known. The status quo would live on. Those who conjured this plan to destroy America would simply restore and rebuild what I destroyed. Though all that death and destruction that I visited on their world made me feel real damned good, it did very little for America and nothing to thwart the plans of the evil ones. In the end. NOTHING would have been gained. America would become a slave nation and the evil ones would continue and consummate their rule and domination.

Believe it or not, Trump IS making changes. Trump IS beating back the deep state. Trump IS hurting them bad and wrecking their plans and their party. Certainly NOT in a way I would do it...which is probably why he is POTUS and I am not. My "kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out" scorch the earth ideas just would not bring about the desired results. I kill the beasts and Trump destroys the entire bloodline. He thinks much longer term than me. I get immediate but short-lived results. He gets long -term results over the course of a few years. I concede, his way IS much better.

As to the article by John Whitehead, he is quite right, at least as measured by the way things were. i, too, have posted several of his well thought out articles on these pages. He is a very sharp man in these matters and I do like his ideas. However, as the Dylan song goes, times, they are a changin'. Mr. Whitehead apparently didn't get that memo. I hope he does. He is someone we could use on our side.
 

anywoundedduck

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,572
Likes
4,878
Location
Kentucky
#5
Believe it or not, Trump IS making changes. Trump IS beating back the deep state. Trump IS hurting them bad and wrecking their plans and their party. Certainly NOT in a way I would do it...which is probably why he is POTUS and I am not. My "kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out" scorch the earth ideas just would not bring about the desired results. I kill the beasts and Trump destroys the entire bloodline. He thinks much longer term than me. I get immediate but short-lived results. He gets long -term results over the course of a few years. I concede, his way IS much better.
Yes, it is exactly how I feel about it. Going to take time to right this ship. Trump has the bilge pumps running full blast, and is draining the swamp, carefully removing those main opposition parties, one by one, replacing them with patriots. Latest example is Whitaker. Great job he did yesterday.
At the conclusion of Mueller's investigation, I am expecting all documents to become unredacted and unclassified. Panic will ensue.
 

historyrepete

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
1,898
Likes
2,620
Location
driving thru flyover
#6
or because our borders are being invaded by armies, which data reports from the Department of Homeland Security refute

Am I to take this to say no one is crossing the border illegally? Or they are not yet an army? Or by what deflections and minutia are they refuting the fact that we are being imaging on our southern border
 

Joe King

Gold Member
Gold Chaser
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
9,046
Likes
9,978
Location
Instant Gratification Land
#7
Yes. A wall CAN both keep invaders out AND keep current population IN as in the Berlin wall. Yet proponents of this argument fail to mention the abundant coast lines of the US. They fail to consider the long land and coastal border with Canada. This leaves well over 3/4 of total US border still open.
Not to mention the fact that a percentage of Americans have access to heavy equipment.
....and that's if there isn't gaps in it, and they aren't planning on building a complete wall, so yes there will be gaps in it.

When time comes that we all must flee to Mexico*, when you get to the gaps in the wall with guards, just bribe them with your Au and you'll get through. Those only bearing fake PM's (Ie: Ag) will be thrown in the gulags.


* Just think for a moment just how f'ed up it would have to be here in order to make the common man/woman seek refuge in a violent gang-run nation like Mexico, to the point the gov would need a wall to keep you from going there. If it's that bad here, Mexico will have already gotten way worse. Half the money that Mexico runs on comes from the US. If things are f'ed up here, all that will get cut off.