• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

The vaccines have started :)

viking

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Survivor
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
2,702
Reaction score
5,099

After reading this I ordered another case of 7.62x39. These kind of people seem like a serious threat to me and my family so one can never be too prepared for the future!
He has described his family as "Workmen's Circle, Zionist, and secular." He credits his background of Judaism with stimulating his interest in methods of inquiry and argument.

In 1989, he organized the Center for Bioethics Conference on Medical Ethics and the Holocaust, the first conference convened to discuss bioethics and the Holocaust. . He also wrote about bioethics in relation to the Holocaust. In 1992, he joined the Medical Advisory Council of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

During the covid-19 pandemic, despite not being an M.D. nor having medical training, he repeatedly stepped into controversy by universally criticizing those who weren't fully vaccinated.


Special to WorldTribune, December 10, 2021
Analysis by
Joe Schaeffer, 247 Real News

It’s always worth noting when the tyranny is presented front and center.

ArthurCaplan-300x154.jpg


Arthur Caplan: ‘I’m an ethics expert.’


On Dec. 8 Goliath media conglomerate The Hearst Corporation provided a multi-newspaper forum to a virulently strident proponent of coronavirus social coercion who proceeded to make the crudest of arguments in support of the creation of vaccine passports in Connecticut.

Apparently inspired by the despotism of neighboring New York City and its maniacal Mayor Bill de Blasio, the Nutmeg State is hot to roll out this particularly jarring form of “your papers, please” oppression. “All we would do is make it easier for them to do so and standardize it,” Democrat Gov. Ned Lamont says of the proposed move and how it would help businesses keep track of the vaccination status of customers. “Probably we’d do it with other states in the region because I think that makes it a lot more effective. I’m not sure we’re going to get to it this year, but we’re certainly looking at it.”

Adjoining New England state Massachusetts and its RINO governor, Charlie Baker, are also keen to barcode Bay State citizens. Systemic hardware is being put into place:
The discussion in Connecticut comes after Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker said his state will implement a QR code-based vaccine verification system.

“It’s a universal standard and we’ve been working with a bunch of other states, there’s probably 15 or 20 of them, to try to create a single QR code that can be used for all sorts of things where people may choose to require a vaccine,” Baker told GBH News.


All of which inspired Arthur Caplan, professor of bioethics and founding director of the Division of Medical Ethics at New York University, to voice his full-throated approval. Proving once again that the hubris of the technocratic class never fails to astound, the piece is draped with an arrogant headline and self-absorbed introductory paragraph:

Opinion: I’m an ethics expert. CT needs vaccine passports.
I have been working on vaccine issues, including COVID-19, for many years with the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Major League Baseball, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the NCAA and many other groups. You might have seen or heard me in the media as I am a regular guest on CNN, WGBH public radio in Boston and WOR in New York City.

Much in keeping with his conceited colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci, Arthur Caplan likes himself. A lot.
There’s nothing intellectually dizzying, however, about the “bioethicist’s” moral argument for vaccine passports. It is astoundingly basic and brutal: What’s wrong with more tyranny? You’re already being violated in so many different ways to begin with:

And if you think Connecticut can track you by having you carry proof of vaccination on your phone, realize that you are already being tracked by your driver’s license, bank, credit card company, Uber account, restaurant reservation app, Facebook, many other social media sites and even your health care provider. A proof-of-vaccination passport ought to be the least of your privacy worries.

It is crucial to emphasize that the coronavirus has furnished the excuse for technocrats to roll out a core functioning moral principle that they have diligently been nurturing for decades: a utilitarian view of human worth is to replace God-given individual rights. Also in keeping with Fauci, Caplan is a zealous advocate for this effort to redefine humanity as mere matter that is to be molded and shaped for the “common good.”

In 2008, while at The University of Pennsylvania, Caplan co-wrote a revealing paper contemplating the pros and cons of mandatory vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV). This was the hyped infection of the time. Merck’s Gardisil vaccine was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June, 2006.

The paper was published in Georgetown University’s Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal by The Johns Hopkins University Press. Inoculating everybody against HPV was the subject up for contemplation:
When stripped of its emotional charge, the debate can be framed as a contest between competing ethical values. This framework can be conceptualized graphically as a conflict between autonomy on the one hand, which militates against government intrusion, andbeneficence, utilitarianism, justice, and nonmaleficence on the other, which may lend support to intervention. When applied to the HPV vaccine, this framework would support a mandate based on utilitarianism, if certain conditions are met and if herd immunity is a realistic objective.

Think of this all as foreshadowing to what we see today. Caplan chillingly laid out the coercive social regimen he is now advocating for Connecticut via vaccine passports:

The application of beneficence to overrule autonomy in the case of particular individuals represents paternalism. This describes the attitude of a physician who provides or withholds a treatment in contravention of a patient’s wishes based on a perception of the patient’s underlying best interests. Paternalism reflects an external judgment of the best ultimate outcome for the patient.

Utilitarianism takes the external judgment one step further to consider the best ultimate outcome for society, as a whole. It implements an explicit balancing of relevant factors to determine the optimum result for the greatest number of people regardless of competing individual needs. Utilitarian concerns can be consistent with those of beneficence, but they can also conflict, as when the best interests of some individuals are at odds with those of the majority. Utilitarianism supports mandating a vaccine to prevent the harm to society that could be caused by the presence of unvaccinated individuals. This is the most prominent and longstanding justification put forth by mandate proponents.


Paving the path to tyranny:

In this situation, a small number of vaccine declinations can have a devastating impact on a community, so the greatest medical benefit for the greatest number of people is achieved by requiring that everyone receive the vaccine. This is true regardless of whether a mandate is in the best interests of every individual or whether it ignores the interest in autonomy. It is an example of government coercion in the service of a competing ethical consideration. It also reflects an implicit hierarchy of public goods in which health takes precedence over rights.

Caplan and co-author Robert Field thoroughly dehumanized mankind by constructing a handy graph to mathematically determine where personal autonomy is to end and utilitarian good demanding coercion is to kick in:

Public health ethics has just begun to struggle with the conflict between individual autonomy and vaccine mandates. The level of emotion involved may make the debate seem overwhelming, however a structured analytical model could make the clash of values more manageable. This is the contribution of a graphic framework that lays out significant competing concerns simultaneously.

Fast forward 13 years. And here is Caplan in September applying this soulless utilitarian morality to the COVID hype. What a fine Bolshevik commissar he would make (2:24 mark of video):

“If you don’t vaccinate… you lose your right to go where you want. Or, to put it quite simply, the critics of vaccination have it backwards. It’s not ‘their body, their choice.’ It’s their choice that leads to the loss of freedom for their body.”


Given what we are learning about the experimental nature of the so-called coronavirus “vaccines” today, it is beyond alarming to note that, while at Penn, Caplan was the subject of a 2000 lawsuitby the family of an 18-year-old who is believed to be the first person to have died from gene therapy experimentation. The experiment was morally greenlighted by Caplan in his “ethicist” role. Remember, prominent bioethicists today have stated that we all have an obligation to take part in such experiments in the name of the “common good” and that the notion of “informed consent” is up for debate:

The family of Tucson teenager Jesse Gelsinger, the first person to die from gene therapy, yesterday sued the research team involved in the deadly experiment and, in an unusual move, the ethicist who offered moral advice on the controversial project….

The ethicist, Arthur Caplan, is the director of bioethics at Penn and a well-known, often-quoted leader in his field… He became involved early in the planning stages for the experiment….
The decision to use relatively healthy adults was controversial because risky, unproven experiments generally use desperately ill people who have exhausted more traditional treatments, so have little to lose. In this case, the virus used to deliver the genes was known to cause liver damage, so some scientists were concerned it might trigger an ammonia crisis in the adults….
The lawsuit contends that the consent form given to Gelsinger underestimated the risk of the experiment, left out crucial information about liver damage suffered by earlier volunteers in the experiment and failed to mention the deaths of monkeys given a similar treatment during pre-clinical studies.


Gee, does any of that sound familiar at all?

The case was settled out of court:
For Paul Gelsinger, Jesse’s father, the lawsuit brings closure to his discussions with Penn about the situation surrounding his son’s death. “I let Penn off the hook here,” Gelsinger said last night. “I could have refused to settle this case.” “It’s over with Penn as far as I’m concerned,” he added. “I don’t need to see them embarrassed anymore.”
[…]

Paul Gelsinger said he was disappointed that Penn never apologized to his family. “An apology from them would go a long way,” he said. “I don’t know if they have the heart to do so. That we never got an apology does not help this wound to heal.”
[…]

“If they don’t have the heart to even apologize, I don’t see how they can consider themselves a national leader in bioethics,” he said.
 
Last edited:

WillA2

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
3,693
Reaction score
9,842
You might have seen or heard me in the media as I am a regular guest on CNN, WGBH public radio in Boston and WOR in New York City.

Well, that tells you a great deal about the author.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

RED ALERT: 5G 'SIGNIFICANT FACTOR' IN HIGHER COVID DEATHS -- ATTORNEY TOM CALLENDER​

God bless you Bitchute friends. We have been given a very brief reprieve from the 5G rollout schedule for today, January 5th. But they still plan to unleash 5G hell all across America later this month. Attorney Tom Callender returns to SGT Report to discuss the extreme threat of the 5G network. We also discuss the Navy SEALS victory agains the Biden/DOD mandatory vaxx mandate, and much more. Thanks for tuning in.
 

uccholdings

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2022
Messages
12
Reaction score
31
This Patent is revealing their entire plan in detail, to use vaccines (many mRNA + DNA) to be injected into us (forever) and controlled by Devices to tag, track, trace and control you. If you are in contact with many people they classify you as a “superspreader,” which you will then be notified through your device to get vaccinated more and controlled more… This Patent outlines their entire depopulation plan.

United States Patent
March 18th 2021
Pub.No.: 2021/0082583 A1

Here is a link to a lady that will explain the Patent in a short video, please see:

 

Goldbrix

Mother Lode Found
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
20,905
Reaction score
33,121
As far as I know the NIH owns it in the creep's name along with the other patents, so the government likes these profits.
HERR FAUCI still gets the majority of the cut.
 
Last edited:

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
26,702
Location
North Carolina

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
HERR FAUCI still gets the majority of the cut.
Not into his personal bank account or portfolio though. He wields the power and is like Santa Claus to all the Pharma companies and the thousands of others who get a cut. When he gets out of federal job he will collect big time like Obama and the Clintons.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
He has described his family as "Workmen's Circle, Zionist, and secular." He credits his background of Judaism with stimulating his interest in methods of inquiry and argument.

In 1989, he organized the Center for Bioethics Conference on Medical Ethics and the Holocaust, the first conference convened to discuss bioethics and the Holocaust. . He also wrote about bioethics in relation to the Holocaust. In 1992, he joined the Medical Advisory Council of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

During the covid-19 pandemic, despite not being an M.D. nor having medical training, he repeatedly stepped into controversy by universally criticizing those who weren't fully vaccinated.


Special to WorldTribune, December 10, 2021
Analysis by
Joe Schaeffer, 247 Real News

It’s always worth noting when the tyranny is presented front and center.

ArthurCaplan-300x154.jpg


Arthur Caplan: ‘I’m an ethics expert.’


On Dec. 8 Goliath media conglomerate The Hearst Corporation provided a multi-newspaper forum to a virulently strident proponent of coronavirus social coercion who proceeded to make the crudest of arguments in support of the creation of vaccine passports in Connecticut.

Apparently inspired by the despotism of neighboring New York City and its maniacal Mayor Bill de Blasio, the Nutmeg State is hot to roll out this particularly jarring form of “your papers, please” oppression. “All we would do is make it easier for them to do so and standardize it,” Democrat Gov. Ned Lamont says of the proposed move and how it would help businesses keep track of the vaccination status of customers. “Probably we’d do it with other states in the region because I think that makes it a lot more effective. I’m not sure we’re going to get to it this year, but we’re certainly looking at it.”

Adjoining New England state Massachusetts and its RINO governor, Charlie Baker, are also keen to barcode Bay State citizens. Systemic hardware is being put into place:
The discussion in Connecticut comes after Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker said his state will implement a QR code-based vaccine verification system.

“It’s a universal standard and we’ve been working with a bunch of other states, there’s probably 15 or 20 of them, to try to create a single QR code that can be used for all sorts of things where people may choose to require a vaccine,” Baker told GBH News.


All of which inspired Arthur Caplan, professor of bioethics and founding director of the Division of Medical Ethics at New York University, to voice his full-throated approval. Proving once again that the hubris of the technocratic class never fails to astound, the piece is draped with an arrogant headline and self-absorbed introductory paragraph:

Opinion: I’m an ethics expert. CT needs vaccine passports.
I have been working on vaccine issues, including COVID-19, for many years with the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Major League Baseball, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the NCAA and many other groups. You might have seen or heard me in the media as I am a regular guest on CNN, WGBH public radio in Boston and WOR in New York City.

Much in keeping with his conceited colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci, Arthur Caplan likes himself. A lot.
There’s nothing intellectually dizzying, however, about the “bioethicist’s” moral argument for vaccine passports. It is astoundingly basic and brutal: What’s wrong with more tyranny? You’re already being violated in so many different ways to begin with:

And if you think Connecticut can track you by having you carry proof of vaccination on your phone, realize that you are already being tracked by your driver’s license, bank, credit card company, Uber account, restaurant reservation app, Facebook, many other social media sites and even your health care provider. A proof-of-vaccination passport ought to be the least of your privacy worries.

It is crucial to emphasize that the coronavirus has furnished the excuse for technocrats to roll out a core functioning moral principle that they have diligently been nurturing for decades: a utilitarian view of human worth is to replace God-given individual rights. Also in keeping with Fauci, Caplan is a zealous advocate for this effort to redefine humanity as mere matter that is to be molded and shaped for the “common good.”

In 2008, while at The University of Pennsylvania, Caplan co-wrote a revealing paper contemplating the pros and cons of mandatory vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV). This was the hyped infection of the time. Merck’s Gardisil vaccine was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June, 2006.

The paper was published in Georgetown University’s Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal by The Johns Hopkins University Press. Inoculating everybody against HPV was the subject up for contemplation:
When stripped of its emotional charge, the debate can be framed as a contest between competing ethical values. This framework can be conceptualized graphically as a conflict between autonomy on the one hand, which militates against government intrusion, andbeneficence, utilitarianism, justice, and nonmaleficence on the other, which may lend support to intervention. When applied to the HPV vaccine, this framework would support a mandate based on utilitarianism, if certain conditions are met and if herd immunity is a realistic objective.

Think of this all as foreshadowing to what we see today. Caplan chillingly laid out the coercive social regimen he is now advocating for Connecticut via vaccine passports:

The application of beneficence to overrule autonomy in the case of particular individuals represents paternalism. This describes the attitude of a physician who provides or withholds a treatment in contravention of a patient’s wishes based on a perception of the patient’s underlying best interests. Paternalism reflects an external judgment of the best ultimate outcome for the patient.

Utilitarianism takes the external judgment one step further to consider the best ultimate outcome for society, as a whole. It implements an explicit balancing of relevant factors to determine the optimum result for the greatest number of people regardless of competing individual needs. Utilitarian concerns can be consistent with those of beneficence, but they can also conflict, as when the best interests of some individuals are at odds with those of the majority. Utilitarianism supports mandating a vaccine to prevent the harm to society that could be caused by the presence of unvaccinated individuals. This is the most prominent and longstanding justification put forth by mandate proponents.


Paving the path to tyranny:

In this situation, a small number of vaccine declinations can have a devastating impact on a community, so the greatest medical benefit for the greatest number of people is achieved by requiring that everyone receive the vaccine. This is true regardless of whether a mandate is in the best interests of every individual or whether it ignores the interest in autonomy. It is an example of government coercion in the service of a competing ethical consideration. It also reflects an implicit hierarchy of public goods in which health takes precedence over rights.

Caplan and co-author Robert Field thoroughly dehumanized mankind by constructing a handy graph to mathematically determine where personal autonomy is to end and utilitarian good demanding coercion is to kick in:

Public health ethics has just begun to struggle with the conflict between individual autonomy and vaccine mandates. The level of emotion involved may make the debate seem overwhelming, however a structured analytical model could make the clash of values more manageable. This is the contribution of a graphic framework that lays out significant competing concerns simultaneously.

Fast forward 13 years. And here is Caplan in September applying this soulless utilitarian morality to the COVID hype. What a fine Bolshevik commissar he would make (2:24 mark of video):

“If you don’t vaccinate… you lose your right to go where you want. Or, to put it quite simply, the critics of vaccination have it backwards. It’s not ‘their body, their choice.’ It’s their choice that leads to the loss of freedom for their body.”


Given what we are learning about the experimental nature of the so-called coronavirus “vaccines” today, it is beyond alarming to note that, while at Penn, Caplan was the subject of a 2000 lawsuitby the family of an 18-year-old who is believed to be the first person to have died from gene therapy experimentation. The experiment was morally greenlighted by Caplan in his “ethicist” role. Remember, prominent bioethicists today have stated that we all have an obligation to take part in such experiments in the name of the “common good” and that the notion of “informed consent” is up for debate:

The family of Tucson teenager Jesse Gelsinger, the first person to die from gene therapy, yesterday sued the research team involved in the deadly experiment and, in an unusual move, the ethicist who offered moral advice on the controversial project….

The ethicist, Arthur Caplan, is the director of bioethics at Penn and a well-known, often-quoted leader in his field… He became involved early in the planning stages for the experiment….
The decision to use relatively healthy adults was controversial because risky, unproven experiments generally use desperately ill people who have exhausted more traditional treatments, so have little to lose. In this case, the virus used to deliver the genes was known to cause liver damage, so some scientists were concerned it might trigger an ammonia crisis in the adults….
The lawsuit contends that the consent form given to Gelsinger underestimated the risk of the experiment, left out crucial information about liver damage suffered by earlier volunteers in the experiment and failed to mention the deaths of monkeys given a similar treatment during pre-clinical studies.


Gee, does any of that sound familiar at all?

The case was settled out of court:
For Paul Gelsinger, Jesse’s father, the lawsuit brings closure to his discussions with Penn about the situation surrounding his son’s death. “I let Penn off the hook here,” Gelsinger said last night. “I could have refused to settle this case.” “It’s over with Penn as far as I’m concerned,” he added. “I don’t need to see them embarrassed anymore.”
[…]

Paul Gelsinger said he was disappointed that Penn never apologized to his family. “An apology from them would go a long way,” he said. “I don’t know if they have the heart to do so. That we never got an apology does not help this wound to heal.”
[…]

“If they don’t have the heart to even apologize, I don’t see how they can consider themselves a national leader in bioethics,” he said.
Very ugly, very belligerent; the service economy especially blacks and Hispanics have their stories of terrible side effects, they just don't trust this government. A good way to get a bumper crop of angry voters energized....
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991

Casey Jones

Train left the station...
Gold Chaser
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
8,246
Reaction score
13,417
Location
Down the road from the Kaczynski ranch
What next? A Kardashian making the mediuh rounds, as an expert on social ethics and morality?

Famous for being famous.

It's easy to laugh at this...but there's a pattern here, and it's not-the-least-bit funny. They are working three-shifts-a-day, to not only divide us, but set us on each other's THROATS. Their lies, agitations, coverups for deaths and tyranny...now, the January-6 political prisoners...they claim, their mistreatment (including, not limited to, denial of a speedy trial and Habeas Corpus) is all one big conspiracy.

Those, they want locked up forever. Mass murderers are released on a thousand-dollars bond. Prison, they obviously think, is for those who have political opinions they don't like.

We need a Secession Revolution - and in the More Perfect Union, we need to rethink and redefine Freedom Of The Press. This, after we execute a million seditionist-journalists, or so.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
What next? A Kardashian making the mediuh rounds, as an expert on social ethics and morality?

Famous for being famous.

It's easy to laugh at this...but there's a pattern here, and it's not-the-least-bit funny. They are working three-shifts-a-day, to not only divide us, but set us on each other's THROATS. Their lies, agitations, coverups for deaths and tyranny...now, the January-6 political prisoners...they claim, their mistreatment (including, not limited to, denial of a speedy trial and Habeas Corpus) is all one big conspiracy.

Those, they want locked up forever. Mass murderers are released on a thousand-dollars bond. Prison, they obviously think, is for those who have political opinions they don't like.

We need a Secession Revolution - and in the More Perfect Union, we need to rethink and redefine Freedom Of The Press. This, after we execute a million seditionist-journalists, or so.

Unfortunately while the news by the mainstream media keeps pushing vaccinations hard they have not reported a single disability or death from them. They have done that with covid but not the vaccine.

The way this gets turned around is for people around well known people to come forward saying that certain athletes or celebrities were injured by a vaccine, whether it was a bad batch or not.
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
1641485909297.png
 

jimswift

Silver Miner
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
691
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SC swamps
So What?

By Brian Wilson
December 16, 2021


According to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989:7

“Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”


So what?


“Acts”, Laws, regulations, restrictions all come with penalties. But without enforcement mechanisms and the will/power/authority to use them, any “Act” is just an arrangement of words on paper to make politicians look righteous.

Consider: If the Government – and the Public – knew for undeniable, irrefutable Fact the dreaded ‘COVID virus’ was developed and released in Wu Han with the explicit intention of devastating the United States and the rest of the ‘Free World’, what precisely would any entity effectively *do* about it?

Bomb Bejing? Impose Severe Financial Sanctions? Condemn China On The World Stage With A Sternly Worded State Dept.
Press Release? Demand Reparations? Express “Outrage!”?


The political status of America indicates the answer is None of the Above.

Consider: According to the Act “Whoever knowingly develops…or knowingly assists…shall be fined or imprisoned for life…”.


So what?


Does any sentient being capable of walking upright believe China’s Chairman Xi Jinping would willingly surrender to such an indictment? That China would pay a fine of any amount? Or be forced to admit its guilt on the World stage for violating the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, being responsible for the death of millions’?

Only the recently lobotomized would check the “Yes” box.


In my last LRC scribbling, I posed two challenges:

Name the 2 things you come in contact with every day that are not taxed, regulated, embargoed, licensed, restricted, or prohibited by the Government;

Name the 2 issues impacting your life on a daily basis that have not originated from Government.

Answers: None and All

With such an unambiguous universal indictment of Government, how are we to understand – and accept – its continued existence?

What “Government Service” could not be more economically, more effectively performed by Private Citizens working in voluntary cooperation to their mutual benefit and, subsequently, the benefit of others?

Aside from ‘National Defense”, what human endeavors would be hobbled by the elimination of Government taxation, confiscation, regulation, economic restrictions, personal as well as commercial prohibitions, and the agencies that enforce them?


The 535 ‘elected officials” – and thousands of unelected bureaucrats – in Washington, in addition to the several thousand who comprise the elected, appointed, and assumed State ‘leaders’ total a tiny fraction of the 330 million people whose lives they presume to run without authority or mutual agreement; the ‘social contract’ is a dirty joke.


Which begs the question: Why?


With such an overwhelming number of acts, laws, orders, regulations negatively impacting the lives of literally every person, why is Government even permitted to exist?

Anyone can write a Declaration, a Constitution, an Act or Law, and with enough guns, command compliance.


That’s not Freedom; that’s not Liberty.


By any logic, reason, or objective analysis, Government is a criminal operation of intimidation, the immoral imposition of Force yielding Tyranny camouflaged by the fiction of Tradition, the designed ineptitude of ‘public education’ and the principled failure of the Press acting as the citizen’s “Watchdog at the Gate”, guarding against the overreach of Government intrusion.

Consider: what was the last act of Government that advanced Freedom, protected Liberty; that ‘secured’ your unalienable rights?

When did you give your ‘consent’ to be governed by sociopaths, psychopaths, narcissists, pedophiles, liars, thieves, and incompetents?

Where is your signed copy of the “social contract”?



So what?


Until a cure for the true ‘pandemic’ of Aggressive Ignorance and its ‘variants’: Contagious Apathy, Instant Gratification, and Technologically Induced Narcissism, the continued erosion of the remainder of Freedom and Liberty will continue, leaving “So What?” unanswered.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
Some tough questions, but there are much bigger issues such as the terrible risks of the "vaccines" which he hardly mentioned, actually Sen Paul recommended the effect of "vaccines" so we didn't need to wear masks:
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
I wish that Rand Paul had addressed all the corrupt trials and bad anti viral drugs like Remdesivir instead of the esoteric though significant issue of "gain of function" research.
All politicians....please allow me to repeat that....ALL politicians are lying, talking heads who strive to appear useful to the people but have no idea how to get anything positive done for the people. They talk a lot but only pass laws that seem to remove more and more freedoms from the people every day. The Democrat vs Republican farce is evidence that politicians, no matter what they call themselves or the color tie they wear, are lying traitors and power hungry tyrants
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

Reports of COVID Vaccine Injuries Pass 1 Million Mark, FDA Signs Off on Pfizer Booster for Kids 12 and Up​

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,000,229 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 21,002 deaths and 162,506 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Dec. 31, 2021, released new data showing a total of 1,000,229 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 21,002 reports of deaths and 162,506 reports of serious injuries. Excluding "foreign reports" to VAERS, 709,084 adverse events, including 9,623 deaths and 62,069 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product's labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 9,623 U.S. deaths reported as of Dec. 24, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 25% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 499.7 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Dec. 23. This includes 291 million doses of Pfizer, 190 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

More:
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991

Reports of COVID Vaccine Injuries Pass 1 Million Mark, FDA Signs Off on Pfizer Booster for Kids 12 and Up​

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,000,229 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 21,002 deaths and 162,506 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Dec. 31, 2021, released new data showing a total of 1,000,229 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 21,002 reports of deaths and 162,506 reports of serious injuries. Excluding "foreign reports" to VAERS, 709,084 adverse events, including 9,623 deaths and 62,069 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 24, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product's labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 9,623 U.S. deaths reported as of Dec. 24, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 25% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 61% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 499.7 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Dec. 23. This includes 291 million doses of Pfizer, 190 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

More:
And since it is very hard to file these reports on VAERS so that they will accept them, the underreporting could easily be by a factor of 50! So the reality is probably tens of millions of these very serious events!!
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
All politicians....please allow me to repeat that....ALL politicians are lying, talking heads who strive to appear useful to the people but have no idea how to get anything positive done for the people. They talk a lot but only pass laws that seem to remove more and more freedoms from the people every day. The Democrat vs Republican farce is evidence that politicians, no matter what they call themselves or the color tie they wear, are lying traitors and power hungry tyrants
The Pauls are intellectually a lot better than most Senators and Congressmen, but Rand Paul looks to me as a good time Charley towel snapping frat boy. An eye doctor, I'm sure very good at that like his Ob-gyn doctor father. But every specialty is a steep learning curve.

Line up all the politicians against the wall and gun them down in a revolution but we may have much worse take over.

Next time we may have a French Revolution as Russia and Cuba went through.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
And since it is very hard to file these reports on VAERS so that they will accept them, the underreporting could easily be by a factor of 50! So the reality is probably tens of millions of these very serious events!!
And how would we really know?

Seriously. Think about it. How many actually died FROM covid?

Now that they've tainted the data we'll never know.

What we can look at is the health insurance records (there's a recent post about this topic).

After a person dies, or 500K people die, where does that info get stored? Do they ever 'store' it accurately? I don't know.

What I do know is, as Cuomo said about the nursing home deaths "People die every day!", as if it really didn't matter, i.e., 'So what?'

Looking at the national death count already showed that on average, there were no more deaths than in years prior. One could surmise from that number that the covid planndemic was a statistically manipulated fear campaign by big pharma (who had the most to gain - always follow the money).


Once you are dead nobody talks with you anymore. You fade from history................ life is for the living.
 

Silvergun

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
1,975
Location
Commie-fornia

jimswift

Silver Miner
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
691
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SC swamps
When Fauci lied to the Senate and then later when proven that he did, and Rand reminded him that he lied.....why wasn't he arrested?

Isn't there a Sergeant at Arms of the Senate? Would that fall under their duties?

What's the procedure for lying to the Senate in a hearing?
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
You can get away with that kind of stuff when you have NO liability! It's a great gig if you can get it!!! Profitable like you wouldn't believe too!
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
When the "vaccines" first came out

View attachment 239898

TodayView attachment 239899
Maybe it was just an exercise is thinking you were protected....the science of the shots seems to be skewed away from benefit and just a risky Russian roulette for many people. Now the governments are using it to exercise vicious power and attack the non compliant in belligerent ways.
 

Ensoniq

Midas Member
Midas Member
Sr Midas Sup +++
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
11,784
Reaction score
26,702
Location
North Carolina
If CVS or other pharmacy refuses to fill a prescription to Ivermectin, you may need to do like this doctor, getting his lawyer to send them a letter: https://www.skirsch.com/covid/TysonIvermectin.pdf

Awesome letter, could have ended “and the horse you rode in on”
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

EVIDENCE OF SELF ASSEMBLING NANO CIRCUITRY IN THE PFIZER VACCINE​

Electron microscopy confirms what official documents and patents have already told us about the trans-humanist agenda.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
2 hrs but interesting - just leave it running in background while you surf...

MASK OMICRON COVER, IMPLANTABLES "WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT" & "UP-TO-DATE" REPLACING "FULLY VAXED"​

The Last American Vagabond
Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
And how would we really know?

Seriously. Think about it. How many actually died FROM covid?

Now that they've tainted the data we'll never know.

What we can look at is the health insurance records (there's a recent post about this topic).

After a person dies, or 500K people die, where does that info get stored? Do they ever 'store' it accurately? I don't know.

What I do know is, as Cuomo said about the nursing home deaths "People die every day!", as if it really didn't matter, i.e., 'So what?'

Looking at the national death count already showed that on average, there were no more deaths than in years prior. One could surmise from that number that the covid planndemic was a statistically manipulated fear campaign by big pharma (who had the most to gain - always follow the money).


Once you are dead nobody talks with you anymore. You fade from history................ life is for the living.
The CDC just admitted that the underreporting is at least by 6.5X: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/icymi-cdc-just-published-a-paper
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

The MOST POWERFUL Antioxidant is Melatonin, NOT Glutathione​

This information is brand new, and it’s one of the most important videos I’ll ever do regarding your health.