• "Spreading the ideas of freedom loving people on matters regarding metals, finance, politics, government and many other topics"

The vaccines have started :)

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

ICAN SUES CDC FOR COVID VACCINE DATA​

ICAN has filed another lawsuit against the CDC, this time for withholding data from the ‘V-Safe’ Covid-19 vaccine safety tracking system.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
15,695
Reaction score
31,827
Location
South Floriduh
Quebecers will soon have to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination to access Société des alcools du Québec (SAQ) and Société québécoise du cannabis (SQDC) stores.

"I hope this will be an additional incentive for some to go get their first dose," he said, noting the new measure will come into effect on Jan. 18. "The vaccination passport will be extended to certain non-essential commerces in the coming weeks and we'll come back with a list after we have talked to the industries."


Doing everything they can to get people jabbed short of a gun to the head.
Brio -- Take heart in this:

Got your vaxx card? Implant chip?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 13:16-18

[16] And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,

[17] and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.

[18] Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like them Froggies say, "plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose" <-- The more it changes, the more it is the same thing.

Lookit:

HE (hereinafter referred to as "the cabal") is forcing everyone to get the "mark" (a chip implant has already been proposed, hasn't it).

The cabal has made it so that no one can go into public places to do business without the mark (serial numbered card) (implant chip).

Know that the cabal is the beast.
 
Last edited:

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
Last edited:

Brio

Site Supporter
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,898
Reaction score
10,894
FIgpZp-UYAAGvQS
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2022-01-08 at 9.30.57 AM.png
 

Atocha

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
368
Reaction score
833
Brio -- Take heart in this:

Got your vaxx card? Implant chip?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revelation 13:16-18

[16] And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,

[17] and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.

[18] Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like them Froggies say, "plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose" <-- The more it changes, the more it is the same thing.

Lookit:

HE (hereinafter referred to as "the cabal") is forcing everyone to get the "mark" (a chip implant has already been proposed, hasn't it).

The cabal has made it so that no one can go into public places to do business without the mark (serial numbered card) (implant chip).

Know that the cabal is the beast.
First, must come the 2 witnesses.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
Last edited:

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
If they can claim its covid the hospital gets huge reimbursements. All it takes is a positive test, even without symptoms.
Hospitals have become enemies of the people along with the government and the media. The world is changing so fast now its hard to keep up with all the new threats
 

viking

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Survivor
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
2,702
Reaction score
5,099
View attachment 240162

"This is how you do it. Of course they have a woman CEO!" :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Amy Siskind (born December 16, 1965) is an American activist and writer. She is the author of The List: A Week-by-Week Reckoning of Trump’s First Year (2018) and organizer of the We the People March.

Siskind was born in Marblehead, Massachusetts, to Jewish parents.

Siskind lives in Westchester County, New York with her two children. She is openly lesbian.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains

DR. ZELENKO - [DS]/BIG PHARMA HID THE CURES FROM WE THE PEOPLE,CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE, COLLAPSE'​

Dr. Zelenko Board Certified Family Physician with over 20 years experience. Dr. Zelenko was nominated for the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Nobel Prize , Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. Dr. Zelenko developed his now famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved countless lives worldwide. Dr. Zelenko recommended that President Trump take hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Zelenko begins the conversation explaining that the vaccine was designed to bring us into the Great Reset. The vaccine is not a vaccine but a mechanism to depopulate, and to hook us up to their new CBDC. The cures have always been there, Big Phara/[DS] has been hiding the cures, the choice was given, inform or collapse, the [DS]/Big Pharma chose collapse.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
Screen Shot 2022-01-08 at 2.24.35 PM.png
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
NEWS RELEASE 7-JAN-2022

Vaccinated women pass COVID-19 antibodies to breastfeeding babies​

UMass Amherst research first to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in infant stool

Peer-Reviewed Publication
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST


Women vaccinated against COVID-19 transfer SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to their breastfed infants, potentially giving their babies passive immunity against the coronavirus, according to University of Massachusetts Amherst research.

The study, published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, measured the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in both breast milk and the stools of breastfed infants.

“This research is the first to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in stool samples from infants of vaccinated mothers,” says lead author Vignesh Narayanaswamy, a Ph.D. candidate in the breastmilk research lab of senior author Kathleen Arcaro, professor of environmental toxicology in the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. “This is really important because women want to know whether their babies have these antibodies, and our study shows that antibodies are being transferred via breast milk. Providing this compelling evidence is motivation for women to continue breastfeeding after they receive the vaccine.”

 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
View attachment 240162

"This is how you do it. Of course they have a woman CEO!" :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
She's a quintessential phony and mattoid, terribly insecure and afraid of any bad publicity; has zero courage or ability to think for herself.

When Scotus says no dice on a federal mandate and it starts to dawn on people that the vaccines are doing squat except for producing a bumper crop of retards and cripples, maybe we will be able to recover.
 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
Safe and effective
3 mins
 

Brio

Site Supporter
Midas Member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
7,898
Reaction score
10,894
NEWS RELEASE 7-JAN-2022

Vaccinated women pass COVID-19 antibodies to breastfeeding babies​

UMass Amherst research first to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in infant stool

Peer-Reviewed Publication
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST


Women vaccinated against COVID-19 transfer SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to their breastfed infants, potentially giving their babies passive immunity against the coronavirus, according to University of Massachusetts Amherst research.

The study, published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, measured the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in both breast milk and the stools of breastfed infants.

“This research is the first to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in stool samples from infants of vaccinated mothers,” says lead author Vignesh Narayanaswamy, a Ph.D. candidate in the breastmilk research lab of senior author Kathleen Arcaro, professor of environmental toxicology in the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. “This is really important because women want to know whether their babies have these antibodies, and our study shows that antibodies are being transferred via breast milk. Providing this compelling evidence is motivation for women to continue breastfeeding after they receive the vaccine.”

Celeste McGovern of LifeSite News reported on one case where the breastfeeding baby died with blood clots, something rarely ever seen in infants, but a common side effect we are seeing with people who take the COVID shots, blood clots which the CDC states are “rare” in spite of the data in VAERS that shows over 10,000 cases of “thrombosis”, including 488 deaths.

VAERS report ID 1532154 was apparently filed by the mother, a 36-year-old woman from New Mexico:


 

Goldhedge

Retired
Midas Supporter ++
GIM Hall Of Fame
Survivor
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
65,054
Reaction score
141,734
Location
Rocky Mountains
first 2 mins is a rehash of the PTB telling us all the vaccine lies - worthy of a watch IMO
Long video, but he does cover a lot of ground

THE COVID NARRATIVE HAS OFFICIALLY COLLAPSED, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE AGENDA HAS BEEN STOPPED​

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours.
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
German scientists--seven arguments against the vaccinations: https://7argumente.de/

The 7 arguments​

Overcoming the split : seven scientific arguments
against compulsory vaccination and in favor of an open discourse​

The corona pandemic has demanded a high human toll and great efforts in all areas of social life over the past two years. In quick succession, new ordinances and laws were passed, which large parts of the population responsibly supported. In the past few months, the political path has been increasingly geared towards vaccination of the entire population, which is mostly viewed as no alternative. This is currently culminating in the discussion of introducing a statutory vaccination requirement - both general and group-specific. The existing sanctions against “unvaccinated people” (and therefore also those whose vaccination certificate has expired) are to be expanded even further.
It is premature to pass a resolution on a statutory vaccination requirement. Because fundamental questions about the new vaccines have not been adequately clarified and are controversial in research. This includes in particular the duration and strength of the vaccination protection as well as the type, frequency and severity of the side effects. No such law should be based on controversial research questions.
The undersigned therefore take the position that a general or group-specific mandatory vaccination against SARS-CoV2 is not justifiable in the current situation due to medical, legal, philosophical and also ethical and religious arguments. Therefore, a decision for or against the COVID19 vaccination must be made individually.
The rationale for our position is summarized in seven arguments. They are in line with the positions of thousands of scientists in Austria, Switzerland, Italy, France, Scandinavia, Great Britain and the United States.

1st argument: The pandemic with SARS-CoV2 will not be ended by vaccination​

One goal of the general compulsory vaccination is to create a population immunized against SARS-CoV2. We consider it questionable whether this goal can actually be achieved with the vaccines available, which are still conditionally approved in the EU.
1.) The immunization by the current vaccines is much weaker and shorter lasting than expected and promised. At most, there is self-protection against severe courses and that only for a few months.
2.) These vaccines do not produce 'sterile' immunity. Despite vaccination, infections and the transmission of viruses are possible at any time. The extent and duration of the external protection are unknown.
3.) New virus variants bypass vaccination protection more and more successfully. The development and vaccination of a vaccine adapted to new virus variants will, according to the current state of affairs, take longer than the average time interval between the appearance of more successful variants. Consequently, this reactive vaccine adaptation cannot produce a uniformly immunized population.
4.) The evolutionary logic of the virus mutation is that of the new variants, those who best bypass the protection of the existing vaccines will be most successful. Full vaccination of the population - with vaccination that does not produce sterile immunity - can increase selection pressure on the virus and therefore even be counterproductive.

2nd argument: The risk potential of the vaccines is too high​

Since the start of the vaccination campaign, no systematic research - including the long-term - risk potential of the novel vaccines has taken place. For the gene-based COVID19 vaccines, it is particularly important that the vaccines and their modes of action are fundamentally new and have not been researched in long-term studies. Vaccine damage could occur in a different way than experience with conventional vaccines suggests.
1.) Even the suspected cases of side effects from COVID19 vaccination recorded by the Paul Ehrlich Institute are worrying in relation to reports on other vaccines. Systematic research into the side effects and risk factors of vaccinations is therefore urgently required.
2.) In addition, the current research shows warning signs of a considerable risk potential of these vaccines:
a) In 2021, and especially in the last few months, there was a significant increase in excess mortality, which has parallels to vaccination: if the number of vaccinations increases, excess mortality also increases; if the number of vaccinations decreases, excess mortality also decreases. This pattern can be found in various countries and could possibly be an indication of previously overlooked dramatic side effects (Appendix 1).
b) The unusually strong increase in cardiovascular and neurological diseases since the start of the vaccination campaign also shows parallels to the vaccination curves (Appendix 2).
c) There are indications that the indicators of the risk of infarction that can be detected in the blood increase significantly after vaccination.
d) The effect of the spike proteins on the human cell metabolism is largely not understood. There is serious evidence that it can be a cause of undesirable side effects.
e) Research results indicate that these side effects can be individual and deviate from the previously known patterns.
f) Current findings on the Omikron variant indicate that people vaccinated against an earlier variant are more susceptible to this new variant than non-vaccinated people.

3rd argument: The risk potential of multiple administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations has not been adequately researched​

The vaccination requirement will presumably provide for continued booster vaccinations, as vaccination protection decreases rapidly and new virus variants emerge. The multiple vaccination (more than two) is an ongoing experiment on the population to accumulate vaccination risks. Then:
1.) So far, no data has been collected in the manufacturer's approval studies.
2.) Also in connection with the currently running booster campaigns, hardly any comprehensive analyzes on the security of the procedure have been published.

4th argument: The general compulsory vaccination with the currently conditionally approved COVID19 vaccines violates constitutional law​

The guarantee of human dignity in Article 1 of the Basic Law is the basis of the Basic Law: As an end-to-end being, the human being is the foundation and goal of law. State measures must never treat it as a mere means to an end (be it for the common good). The dignity of the individual subject cannot be weighed against other fundamental rights; it is rather absolute. A vaccination obligation interfered with the protection of the right to self-determination with regard to medical interventions in the physical and mental integrity and in the physical integrity of the person concerned, which is guaranteed by the guarantee of human dignity. Furthermore, an impairment of the freedom of belief and conscience according to Art. 4 GG is possible.
1.) With regard to the encroachment on Article 2, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law, the constitutionality of an obligation to vaccinate is questionable because of the questionable purpose and lack of suitability , necessity and appropriateness .
a) In this respect, the choice of a legitimate purpose is unclear . The main considerations are: herd immunity, interruption of chains of infection, avoidance of deaths and severe courses (and the associated relief for the health system), end of the pandemic.
b) The suitability of a general vaccination requirement is clearly denied with regard to the first two purposes mentioned under a). With a view to avoiding severe courses, it should be pointed out that the conditionally approved vaccines lose their effect after a very short period of time (3 to 6 months) and, in any case, are not suitable for the long term. Furthermore, their effectiveness for new virus mutations cannot be assumed (cf. 1st argument under 3.). For the same reasons, a general compulsory vaccination is also unsuitable for ending the pandemic.
c) The necessity would only be answered in the affirmative if there were no more lenient means of achieving the goals that would be equally suitable. Since the suitability is questionable, considerations are at best hypothetical: Such considerations would, for example, concern the protection of vulnerable groups, the improvement of the health system or the (if possible) prompt adaptation of the vaccines. In the design of the general vaccination obligation, less drastic variants should also be considered: for example, a wide exemption for medical indications even in the case of existing medical uncertainties (autoimmune diseases, dispositions for vaccine damage - previous allergies or damage to vaccinations, known heart diseases, etc.), which an individual Enable doctor-patient weighing.
d) Appropriatenessin the narrower sense presupposes that when weighing up the impaired and the protected interests, there is a clear predominance of the protection of the general public intended by the mandatory vaccination. That is not the case here. Because the risk ratio between the risk of a severe course or death from COVID and the risk of severe or fatal side effects from the vaccination is to the disadvantage of the vaccination for large groups of people. According to serious scientists, the risk of younger adults is higher in the case of vaccination. In addition, there is a demonstrably considerable risk potential of the new and only conditionally approved vaccines, which is not yet sufficiently well known (cf. 2nd argument). That means,
2.) A mandatory vaccination subject to a fine collides with Art. 1 GG. This protectspeople from being reified - treated as a mere object. The compulsory vaccination would force him to tolerate an irreversible intervention in his body by means of a medical treatment that was previously only conditionally approved, i.e. a medical treatment complex that has not yet been adequately researched. This would also be done solely for the sake of the other members of society or for the purpose of fighting pandemics for society as a whole or - depending on the target - to maintain medical treatment resources. To what extent these purposes can actually be achieved through compulsory vaccination is unclear. What is constitutionally clear, however, is that the use of the individual is inadmissible even if if it can protect the well-being and even the lives of many others with a probability bordering on certainty. Unvaccinated people in their sheer existence would be made illegal by a general obligation to vaccinate and criminalized by the threat of sanctions.
3.) With regard to Article 4 of the Basic Law, it should be borne in mind that individuals are free to refuse medical interventions for ideological or religious reasons in the area of their freedom of belief and conscience.

5th argument: The overload of the hospitals by COVID19 sufferers is not clearly proven by the statistical data​

The general compulsory vaccination is justified, among other things, by relieving the burden on hospitals and in particular on intensive care units. There are also many unanswered questions in this context.
1.) Even after almost two years of pandemic, there are no reliable findings as to what proportion of the reported COVID19 patients are being treated in hospitals for a COVID19 disease and what proportion is in the hospital for another cause.
2.) Insufficient statistical information is available on the vaccination status, age distribution and the presence of previous illnesses of the actual COVID19 patients.
3.) Hospitals are subject to economic constraints and political incentives when providing treatment capacities for COVID-19. Ongoing debates about the decreasing number of beds registered as "operable" under changing framework conditions lead to the question: Can the burden on this system not be eased through appropriate and transparent administrative and financial support?

6th argument: Measures other than vaccination have not been exhausted​

The one-sided propagation of the compulsory vaccination continues the neglect of other effective measures against the pandemic that has already been practiced in the last two years, such as the failure to improve the working conditions of nurses and doctors, the maintenance or replenishment of the intensive care bed capacity as well as the development and use of therapies and Medication.

7th argument: The COVID19 vaccination obligation accelerates social conflicts​

The compulsory vaccination is based on the assumption that society can return to normal with it. The opposite is the case: society is being divided more deeply. Citizens who consciously decide against vaccination for medical, ideological, religious or other reasons are marginalized and possibly even prosecuted. Public discourse creates artificial worlds in which critical voices can hardly be heard. Language itself is also pushed into the role of a vicarious agent for controversial political goals. Simplifying definitions (“vaccinated” - “unvaccinated”) promote polarization in our society; Euphemistic abbreviations such as “2-G” disguise the fact that a (large) minority is systematically, publicly and rigidly excluded from social life.
As a result of the growing politicization, there is also an interdisciplinary ideological standardization in academic research as “science”. This represents a disregard of the plural, free discourse on the urgently needed gain in knowledge about the benefits and risks of vaccination.
The confidence of many citizens in the state could be fundamentally shaken by strengthening this course. The resulting conflicts affect the rule of law and democracy.
The seven arguments put forward are intended to raise questions, the clarification of which should be a prerequisite for a decision regarding compulsory vaccination against Covid-19.
The arguments are not directed against a specific content position. Rather, they are arguments in favor of the fact that in the current situation it is important to develop a common approach to questions in science that allows a currently non-existent solid basis to be found for health and mental distress with a view to all dimensions of the crisis to alleviate each other.
Out of this spirit of freedom of science and human dignity, we ask that joint efforts be made to overcome the current situation with its multiple suffering and the division of our society and to heal its scars permanently.
 

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
10,079
Reaction score
15,827

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269

dacrunch

Midas Member
Midas Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
10,079
Reaction score
15,827

WillA2

Silver Member
Silver Miner
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Messages
3,693
Reaction score
9,842
A federal judge has rejected a request by the FDA to produce just 500 pages per month of the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine - and has ordered them to produce 55,000 pages per month. Assuming there are roughly 450,000 pages, that means it will take just over eight months for the world to see what's under the hood.

Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents the plaintiff in the case, has provided this stunning update via his blog, Injecting Freedom:

On behalf of a client, my firm requested that the FDA produce all the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA asked the Court for permission to only be required to produce at a rate of 500 pages per month, which would have taken over 75 years to produce all the documents.

I am pleased to report that a federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request and ordered the FDA to produce all the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month!

This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

How many more will be poisoned while the "pages" are released and the truth is buried?
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
How many more will be poisoned while the "pages" are released and the truth is buried?
The tide will turn when the nurses and doctors get upset enough to go public with all the fully vaccinated people in the hospitals, etc. who they are seeing sick from the shots.
 

the_shootist

Mother Lode Found
Sr Midas Sup +++
Mother Lode
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
73,483
Reaction score
157,110
The tide will turn when the nurses and doctors get upset enough to go public with all the fully vaccinated people in the hospitals, etc. who they are seeing sick from the shots.
Well, they have but they're being censored. The tide will turn when enough people realize this won't stop unless we the people pick up the right tools and stop it!
 

Krag

Planet earth
Platinum Bling
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
4,991
"Conspiracy Theorists" are really on a roll...

It's much worse than that; every woman who gets these shots gets the mRNA material right into her ovaries where it does weird things. Some women bleed uncontrollably. We really don't know how bad the long term effects are. This is killing real natural sex for those getting these shots.
 

Unca Walt

Midas Member
Midas Member
Site Supporter ++
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
15,695
Reaction score
31,827
Location
South Floriduh

Uglytruth

Super Moderator
Mother Lode
Midas Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
18,914
Reaction score
45,269

The Needle Lies ~ Queensryche with lyrics​

 

EO 11110

UNBANNED
Mother Lode
Site Supporter ++
Survivor
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
20,145
Reaction score
21,153
Location
clown world

The antiviral effectiveness of allicin (L-cysteine) has been shown by numerous studies in both levels of clinical and animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of allicin (L-cysteine) on clinical presentation and prognosis. In the current study, 66 patients with COVID-19 based on clinical, radiological presentations and RT-PCR results, were enrolled in two groups of placebo and allicin. In the both allicin (L-cysteine) and placebo groups (n=33 in each group), the capsules were prescribed two times a day for two weeks. Clinical signs and symptoms, blood parameters and chest CT scan were evaluated before and two weeks after treatment. The results showed that allicin (L-cysteine) could significantly impact on improvement of signs and symptoms of COVID-19 after two weeks of treatment in comparison to placebo. Allicin (L-cysteine) not only improve the clinical signs, but also ameliorate the lab and radiological data, which suggest a therapeutic effect for this agent in COVID-19. Our data suggest the therapeutic effect of allicin (L-cysteine) on COVID-19 through improvement of clinical symptoms and acceleration of the healing process.
 

uccholdings

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2022
Messages
12
Reaction score
31
.
 

Attachments

  • 36AB7B3D-D5B9-497A-B820-3EFDF83E2461.jpeg
    36AB7B3D-D5B9-497A-B820-3EFDF83E2461.jpeg
    366 KB · Views: 13
  • 4C8FF73D-489C-4248-B3D1-684944BB13D1.jpeg
    4C8FF73D-489C-4248-B3D1-684944BB13D1.jpeg
    353.4 KB · Views: 13
  • 7B509C55-EA5D-47D5-AC77-E3CCB0E13E1F.jpeg
    7B509C55-EA5D-47D5-AC77-E3CCB0E13E1F.jpeg
    349.7 KB · Views: 10
  • 3399547F-AD9B-4444-BE66-D582C4507DA3.jpeg
    3399547F-AD9B-4444-BE66-D582C4507DA3.jpeg
    439.7 KB · Views: 13
  • 42AF8423-AA24-468A-949B-D1C7717E814E.jpeg
    42AF8423-AA24-468A-949B-D1C7717E814E.jpeg
    442.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 5308C19D-D493-4399-BB43-714018C00A5C.jpeg
    5308C19D-D493-4399-BB43-714018C00A5C.jpeg
    319 KB · Views: 10